Demand for LLMs: Descriptive Evidence on Substitution, Market Expansion, and Multihoming
Open accessAbstract
This paper documents three stylized facts about the demand for Large Language Models (LLMs) using data from OpenRouter, a prominent LLM marketplace. First, new models experience rapid initial adoption that stabilizes within weeks. Second, model releases differ substantially in whether they primarily attract new users or substitute demand from competing models. Third, multihoming, using multiple models simultaneously, is common among apps. These findings suggest significant horizontal and vertical differentiation in the LLM market, implying opportunities for providers to maintain demand and pricing power despite rapid technological advances.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
If vertical integration proves essential, concentration among agent providers is likely to mirror the concentration already present in the foundation model industry.
“If vertical integration proves essential, concentration among agent providers is likely to mirror the concentration already present in the foundation model industry (Fradkin 2025).”
From The Coasean Singularity? Demand, Supply, and Market Design with AI Agents (2025) · cites this paper as Fradkin 2025
The Introduction and §3.2 discuss LLM demand, multi-homing, and the possibility that integration with a coding tool affects model choice. They do not address whether vertical integration is essential for agent providers or predict that concentration among those providers will mirror concentration in the foundation-model industry (searched: vertical integration, agent providers, market concentration). (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Brynjolfsson, Erik, Danielle Li, and Lindsey Raymond. 2025. "Generative AI at work." The Quar- terly Journal of Economics: qjae044.
- Conlon, Christopher, and Julie Holland Mortimer. 2021. "Empirical properties of diversion ratios." The RAND Journal of Economics 52 (4): 693-726.
- Dube, Jean-Pierre. 2019. "Microeconometric models of consumer demand." In Handbook of the Economics of Marketing, edited by Jean-Pierre Dube and Peter E Rossi, vol. 1, chap. 1, 1-68.
- Eloundou, Tyna, Sam Manning, Pamela Mishkin, and Daniel Rock. 2024. "GPTs are GPTs: Labor market impact potential of LLMs." Science 384 (6702): 1306-1308.
- Handa, Kunal, Tyna Eloundou, Anand Thakkar, Richard Mansfield, and Daniel Rock. 2025. "Which Economic Tasks are Performed with AI? Evidence from Millions of Claude Conver- sations." arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.04761. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Coasean Singularity? Demand, Supply, and Market Design with AI Agents
Shahidi, P., Rusak, G., Manning, B., Fradkin, A., & Horton, J. (2025) · doi:10.3386/w34468 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Fradkin, A.
- Corresponding author
- Fradkin, Andrey
- ORCID
- Fradkin, Andrey
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2025
- arXiv
- 2504.15440
- OpenAlex
- W4414631693
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Merger and Competition Analysis
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
- Keywords
- large language models, multihoming, market expansion, LLM adoption, horizontal differentiation, vertical differentiation, pricing power, OpenRouter
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
