PreprintCited by 3Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisTopic Modeling

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Symbolic Representation for Any-to-Any Generative Tasks

Open access

Abstract

We propose a symbolic generative task description language and a corresponding inference engine capable of representing arbitrary multimodal tasks as structured symbolic flows. Unlike conventional generative models that rely on large-scale training and implicit neural representations to learn cross-modal mappings, often at high computational cost and with limited flexibility, our framework introduces an explicit symbolic representation comprising three core primitives: functions, parameters, and topological logic. Leveraging a pre-trained language model, our inference engine maps natural language instructions directly to symbolic workflows in a training-free manner. Our framework successfully performs over 12 diverse multimodal generative tasks, demonstrating strong performance and flexibility without the need for task-specific tuning. Experiments show that our method not only matches or outperforms existing state-of-the-art unified models in content quality, but also offers greater efficiency, editability, and interruptibility. We believe that symbolic task representations provide a cost-effective and extensible foundation for advancing the capabilities of generative AI.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2504.17261

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These advancements enable applications previously impossible with text-only models, such as image captioning and sophisticated multimodal reasoning.

    “These advancements enable applications previously impossible with text-only models, such as image captioning and sophisticated multimodal reasoning [1182, 683, 139].”

    From A Survey of Context Engineering for Large Language Models (2025) · cites this paper as [139]

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Chen, J., Zhu, X., Wang, Y., Liu, T., Chen, X., Chen, Y., Leong, C. T., Ke, Y., Liu, J., Yuan, Y., McAuley, J., & Li, L.-J.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • South China University of Technology (CN)
  • Cornell University (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
  • Wuhan University (CN)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2025
Pages
27816-27826
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4413144711
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
1.51
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
Keywords
symbolic representation, inference engine, training-free inference, cross-modal mapping, topological logic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review