PreprintCited by 1Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningLow-power high-performance VLSI design

Precision Neural Network Quantization via Learnable Adaptive Modules

Open access
Zhou, Wenqiang, Yu, Zhendong, Liu, Xinyu, Yang, Jiaming, Xiao, Rong, Wang, Tao, Tang, Chenwei, Lv, Jiancheng·2025·arXiv

Abstract

Quantization Aware Training (QAT) is a neural network quantization technique that compresses model size and improves operational efficiency while effectively maintaining model performance. The paradigm of QAT is to introduce fake quantization operators during the training process, allowing the model to autonomously compensate for information loss caused by quantization. Making quantization parameters trainable can significantly improve the performance of QAT, but at the cost of compromising the flexibility during inference, especially when dealing with activation values with substantially different distributions. In this paper, we propose an effective learnable adaptive neural network quantization method, called Adaptive Step Size Quantization (ASQ), to resolve this conflict. Specifically, the proposed ASQ method first dynamically adjusts quantization scaling factors through a trained module capable of accommodating different activations. Then, to address the rigid resolution issue inherent in Power of Two (POT) quantization, we propose an efficient non-uniform quantization scheme. We utilize the Power Of Square root of Two (POST) as the basis for exponential quantization, effectively handling the bell-shaped distribution of neural network weights across various bit-widths while maintaining computational efficiency through a Look-Up Table method (LUT). Extensive experimental results demonstrate that the proposed ASQ method is superior to the state-of-the-art QAT approaches. Notably that the ASQ is even competitive compared to full precision baselines, with its 4-bit quantized ResNet34 model improving accuracy by 1.2\% on ImageNet.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2504.17263

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Contemporary edge computing studies continue to employ established low-bit quantization methods like DoReFa-Net and PACT as benchmark standards, with these approaches remaining prevalent in actual edge deployments.

    “contemporary edge computing studies continue to employ established low-bit quantization methods like DoReFa-Net and PACT as benchmark standards [63-66], with these approaches remaining prevalent in actual edge deployments.”

    From HADQ-Net: A Power-Efficient and Hardware-Adaptive Deep Convolutional Neural Network Translator Based on Quantization-Aware Training for Hardware Accelerators (2025) · cites this paper as [66]

    Section 2.1 describes DoReFa-Net and PACT as low-bit quantization methods, and Section 4.2 includes PACT in an ImageNet benchmark comparison. DoReFa-Net is not listed in that comparison, and the paper does not establish that either method remains prevalent in actual edge deployments. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. A. Vaswani, Attention is all you need, arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.03762 (2017). · arXiv
  2. R. D. Peacocke, D. H. Graf, An introduction to speech and speaker recognition, in: Readings in human-computer interaction, Elsevier, 1995, pp. 546-553.
  3. J. Choi, Z. Wang, S. Venkataramani, P. I. Chuang, V. Srinivasan, K. Gopalakrishnan, PACT: parameterized clipping activation for quan- tized neural networks, CoRR abs/1805.06085 (2018). arXiv:1805. 06085. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1805.06085 · arXiv
  4. S. K. Esser, J. L. McKinstry, D. Bablani, R. Appuswamy, D. S. Modha, Learned step size quantization, CoRR abs/1902.08153 (2019). arXiv: 1902.08153. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1902.08153 · arXiv
  5. T. Gale, E. Elsen, S. Hooker, The state of sparsity in deep neural net- works, CoRR abs/1902.09574 (2019). arXiv:1902.09574. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1902.09574 · arXiv
  6. D. Blalock, J. J. Gonzalez Ortiz, J. Frankle, J. Guttag, What is the state of neural network pruning?, in: I. Dhillon, D. Papailiopoulos, V. Sze (Eds.), Proceedings of Machine Learning and Systems, Vol. 2, 2020, pp. 129-146.
  7. S. Ahn, S. X. Hu, A. Damianou, N. D. Lawrence, Z. Dai, Variational information distillation for knowledge transfer, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2019.
  8. H. Yin, P. Molchanov, J. M. Alvarez, Z. Li, A. Mallya, D. Hoiem, N. K. Jha, J. Kautz, Dreaming to distill: Data-free knowledge transfer via deepinversion, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2020.
  9. T. Elsken, J. H. Metzen, F. Hutter, Neural architecture search: A sur- vey, Journal of Machine Learning Research 20 (55) (2019) 1-21. URL http://jmlr.org/papers/v20/18-598.html
  10. A. Howard, M. Sandler, G. Chu, L.-C. Chen, B. Chen, M. Tan, W. Wang, Y. Zhu, R. Pang, V. Vasudevan, Q. V. Le, H. Adam, Search- ing for mobilenetv3, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2019.
  11. A. Gholami, S. Kim, Z. Dong, Z. Yao, M. W. Mahoney, K. Keutzer, A survey of quantization methods for efficient neural network inference, in: Low-Power Computer Vision, Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2022, pp. 291-326.
  12. Y. Bhalgat, J. Lee, M. Nagel, T. Blankevoort, N. Kwak, Lsq+: Improv- ing low-bit quantization through learnable offsets and better initializa- tion, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) Workshops, 2020.
  13. Y. Bengio, N. Léonard, A. C. Courville, Estimating or propagating gra- dients through stochastic neurons for conditional computation, CoRR abs/1308.3432 (2013). arXiv:1308.3432. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1308.3432 · arXiv
  14. S. K. Esser, P. A. Merolla, J. V. Arthur, A. S. Cassidy, R. Appuswamy, A. Andreopoulos, D. J. Berg, J. L. McKinstry, T. Melano, D. R. Barch, et al., From the cover: Convolutional networks for fast, energy-efficient neuromorphic computing, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci- ences of the United States of America 113 (41) (2016) 11441.
  15. J. L. McKinstry, S. K. Esser, R. Appuswamy, D. Bablani, J. V. Arthur, I. B. Yildiz, D. S. Modha, Discovering low-precision networks close to full-precision networks for efficient embedded inference, CoRR abs/1809.04191 (2018). arXiv:1809.04191. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1809.04191 · arXiv
  16. S. Jung, C. Son, S. Lee, J. Son, J.-J. Han, Y. Kwak, S. J. Hwang, C. Choi, Learning to quantize deep networks by optimizing quantization intervals with task loss, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2019.
  17. D. Zhang, J. Yang, D. Ye, G. Hua, Lq-nets: Learned quantization for highly accurate and compact deep neural networks, in: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 2018.
  18. D. Miyashita, E. H. Lee, B. Murmann, Convolutional neural networks using logarithmic data representation, CoRR abs/1603.01025 (2016). arXiv:1603.01025. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1603.01025 · arXiv
  19. Y. Li, X. Dong, W. Wang, Additive powers-of-two quantization: An efficient non-uniform discretization for neural networks, arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.13144 (2019). · arXiv
  20. Y. Chen, X. Dai, M. Liu, D. Chen, L. Yuan, Z. Liu, Dynamic con- volution: Attention over convolution kernels, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2020.
  21. S. Zhou, Z. Ni, X. Zhou, H. Wen, Y. Wu, Y. Zou, Dorefa-net: Training low bitwidth convolutional neural networks with low bitwidth gradients, CoRR abs/1606.06160 (2016). arXiv:1606.06160. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1606.06160 · arXiv
  22. R. Gong, X. Liu, S. Jiang, T. Li, P. Hu, J. Lin, F. Yu, J. Yan, Dif- ferentiable soft quantization: Bridging full-precision and low-bit neural networks, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2019.
  23. A. Zhou, A. Yao, Y. Guo, L. Xu, Y. Chen, Incremental network quantization: Towards lossless cnns with low-precision weights, CoRR abs/1702.03044 (2017). arXiv:1702.03044. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1702.03044 · arXiv
  24. K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, J. Sun, Deep residual learning for image recog- nition, in: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2016.
  25. M. Sandler, A. Howard, M. Zhu, A. Zhmoginov, L.-C. Chen, Mo- bilenetv2: Inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks, in: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2018.
  26. I. Loshchilov, F. Hutter, Sgdr: Stochastic gradient descent with warm restarts, arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.03983 (2016). · arXiv
  27. D. Kim, J. Lee, B. Ham, Distance-aware quantization, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2021, pp. 5271-5280.
  28. C. Tang, K. Ouyang, Z. Wang, Y. Zhu, W. Ji, Y. Wang, W. Zhu, Mixed- precision neural network quantization via learned layer-wise importance, in: S. Avidan, G. Brostow, M. Cissé, G. M. Farinella, T. Hassner (Eds.), Computer Vision -ECCV 2022, Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 2022, pp. 259-275.
  29. C. Tang, Y. Meng, J. Jiang, S. Xie, R. Lu, X. Ma, Z. Wang, W. Zhu, Retraining-free model quantization via one-shot weight-coupling learn- ing, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2024, pp. 15855-15865.
  30. J. Shin, J. So, S. Park, S. Kang, S. Yoo, E. Park, Nipq: Noise proxy-based integrated pseudo-quantization, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2023, pp. 3852-3861.

Authors
Zhou, W., Yu, Z., Liu, X., Yang, J., Xiao, R., Wang, T., Tang, C., & Lv, J.
Affiliations
Sichuan University (CN)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2025
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4415307021
Cited by
0
References
0
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Low-power high-performance VLSI design
Keywords
neural network quantization, quantization-aware training, non-uniform quantization, look-up table, activation distribution, model compression, 4-bit quantization, ResNet34

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review