PreprintCited by 3Parallel Computing and Optimization TechniquesEmbedded Systems Design TechniquesAdvanced Neural Network Applications

TileLang: A Composable Tiled Programming Model for AI Systems

Open access
Wang, Lei, Cheng, Yu, Shi, Yining, Tang, Zhengju, Mo, Zhiwen, Xie, Wenhao, Ma, Lingxiao, Xia, Yuqing +3 more·2025·arXiv

Abstract

Modern AI workloads rely heavily on optimized computing kernels for both training and inference. These AI kernels follow well-defined data-flow patterns, such as moving tiles between DRAM and SRAM and performing a sequence of computations on those tiles. However, writing high-performance kernels remains complex despite the clarity of these patterns. Achieving peak performance requires careful, hardware-centric optimizations to fully leverage modern accelerators. While domain-specific compilers attempt to reduce the burden of writing high-performance kernels, they often struggle with usability and expressiveness gaps. In this paper, we present TileLang, a generalized tiled programming model for more efficient AI Kernel programming. TileLang decouples scheduling space (thread binding, layout, tensorize and pipeline) from dataflow, and encapsulated them as a set of customization annotations and primitives. This approach allows users to focus on the kernel's data-flow itself, while leaving most other optimizations to compilers. We conduct comprehensive experiments on commonly-used devices, across numerous experiments, our evaluation shows that TileLang can achieve state-of-the-art performance in key kernels, demonstrating that its unified block-and-thread paradigm and transparent scheduling capabilities deliver both the power and flexibility demanded by modern AI system development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2504.17577

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many deep learning systems leverage low-level GPU programming libraries and languages such as CUDA, Triton, TileLang, and CUTLASS to implement their most performance-sensitive kernels.

    “To mitigate the performance bottlenecks in dynamic graph execution, many deep learning systems leverage lowlevel GPU programming libraries and languages (e.g., CUDA [162], Triton [163], TileLang [164], and CUTLASS [165]) to implement their most performance-sensitive kernels.”

    From A Survey of Large Language Models (2026) · cites this paper as [164]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Tianqi Chen, Thierry Moreau, Ziheng Jiang, Lianmin Zheng, Eddie Yan, Haichen Shen, Meghan Cowan, Leyuan Wang, Yuwei Hu, Luis Ceze, et al. {TVM}: An automated {End-to-End} optimizing compiler for deep learning. In 13th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI 18), pages 578-594, 2018.
  2. Tianqi Chen, Thierry Moreau, Ziheng Jiang, Lianmin Zheng, Eddie Yan, Haichen Shen, Meghan Cowan, Leyuan Wang, Yuwei Hu, Luis Ceze, Carlos Guestrin, and Arvind Krishnamurthy. TVM: An automated end-to-end optimizing compiler for deep learning. In 13th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI 18), pages 578-594, Carlsbad, CA, 2018. USENIX Association.
  3. Tri Dao, Dan Fu, Stefano Ermon, Atri Rudra, and Christopher Ré. Flashattention: Fast and memory-efficient exact attention with io-awareness. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:16344-16359, 2022.
  4. Bastian Hagedorn, Bin Fan, Hanfeng Chen, Cris Cecka, Michael Garland, and Vinod Grover. Graphene: An ir for optimized tensor computations on gpus. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, Volume 3, pages 302-313, 2023.
  5. Young Jin Kim, Rawn Henry, Raffy Fahim, and Hany Hassan Awadalla. Who says elephants can't run: Bringing large scale moe models into cloud scale production. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.10017, 2022. · arXiv
  6. Phitchaya Mangpo Phothilimthana, Archibald Samuel Elliott, An Wang, Abhinav Jangda, Bastian Hagedorn, Henrik Barthels, Samuel J Kaufman, Vinod Grover, Emina Torlak, and Rastislav Bodik. Swizzle inventor: data movement synthesis for gpu kernels. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, pages 65-78, 2019.
  7. Jay Shah, Ganesh Bikshandi, Ying Zhang, Vijay Thakkar, Pradeep Ramani, and Tri Dao. Flashattention-3: Fast and accurate attention with asynchrony and low-precision. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.08608, 2024. · arXiv
  8. Lei Wang, Lingxiao Ma, Shijie Cao, Quanlu Zhang, Jilong Xue, Yining Shi, Ningxin Zheng, Ziming Miao, Fan Yang, Ting Cao, et al. Ladder: Enabling efficient {Low-Precision} deep learning computing through hardware-aware tensor transformation. In 18th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI 24), pages 307-323, 2024.
  9. Thomas Wolf, Lysandre Debut, Victor Sanh, Julien Chaumond, Clement Delangue, Anthony Moi, Pierric Cistac, Tim Rault, Rémi Louf, Morgan Funtowicz, et al. Huggingface's transformers: State-of-the-art natural language processing. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.03771, 2019. · arXiv
  10. Ling Yang, Zhilong Zhang, Yang Song, Shenda Hong, Runsheng Xu, Yue Zhao, Wentao Zhang, Bin Cui, and Ming-Hsuan Yang. Diffusion models: A comprehensive survey of methods and applications. ACM Computing Surveys, 56(4):1-39, 2023.
  11. Lianmin Zheng, Chengfan Jia, Minmin Sun, Zhao Wu, Cody Hao Yu, Ameer Haj-Ali, Yida Wang, Jun Yang, Danyang Zhuo, Koushik Sen, Joseph E. Gonzalez, and Ion Stoica. Ansor: Generating high-performance tensor programs for deep learning. In 14th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI 20), pages 863-879. USENIX Association, November 2020. , Vol. 1, No. 1, Article . Publication date: April 2025.
  12. Hongyu Zhu, Ruofan Wu, Yijia Diao, Shanbin Ke, Haoyu Li, Chen Zhang, Jilong Xue, Lingxiao Ma, Yuqing Xia, Wei Cui, Fan Yang, Mao Yang, Lidong Zhou, Asaf Cidon, and Gennady Pekhimenko. ROLLER: Fast and efficient tensor compilation for deep learning. In 16th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI 22), pages 233-248, Carlsbad, CA, July 2022. USENIX Association.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, L., Cheng, Y., Shi, Y., Tang, Z., Mo, Z., Xie, W., Ma, L., Xia, Y., Xue, J., Yang, F., & Yang, Z.
Affiliations
Peking University (CN)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2025
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4415307680
Cited by
0
References
0
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Embedded Systems Design Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
domain-specific compiler, dataflow programming, thread scheduling, tensorization, hardware acceleration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review