Scaling Computer-Use Grounding via User Interface Decomposition and Synthesis
Open accessAbstract
Graphical user interface (GUI) grounding, the ability to map natural language instructions to specific actions on graphical user interfaces, remains a critical bottleneck in computer use agent development. Current benchmarks oversimplify grounding tasks as short referring expressions, failing to capture the complexity of real-world interactions that require software commonsense, layout understanding, and fine-grained manipulation capabilities. To address these limitations, we introduce OSWorld-G, a comprehensive benchmark comprising 564 finely annotated samples across diverse task types including text matching, element recognition, layout understanding, and precise manipulation. Additionally, we synthesize and release the largest computer use grounding dataset Jedi, which contains 4 million examples through multi-perspective decoupling of tasks. Our multi-scale models trained on Jedi demonstrate its effectiveness by outperforming existing approaches on ScreenSpot-v2, ScreenSpot-Pro, and our OSWorld-G. Furthermore, we demonstrate that improved grounding with Jedi directly enhances agentic capabilities of general foundation models on complex computer tasks, improving from 5% to 27% on OSWorld. Through detailed ablation studies, we identify key factors contributing to grounding performance and verify that combining specialized data for different interface elements enables compositional generalization to novel interfaces. All benchmark, data, checkpoints, and code are open-sourced and available at https://osworld-grounding.github.io.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Mobile-Env: Building Qualified Evaluation Benchmarks for LLM-GUI Interaction
Zhang, D., Shen, Z., Xie, R., Zhang, S., Xie, T., Zhao, Z., Chen, S., Chen, L., Xu, H., Cao, R., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.08144 · Cited by 1 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Existing digital agent research focuses on establishing environments for mobile and web interaction [34, 24, 28, 40, 50, 56, 33, 53, 19, 13, 41], with subsequent works extending to real-world computer interaction scenarios [46, 7].”
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bai, S., Cai, Y., Chen, R., Chen, K., Chen, X., Cheng, Z., Deng, L., Ding, W., Gao, C., Ge, C., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.21631 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
“We evaluate UI perception with GUI-grounding tasks (ScreenSpot (Cheng et al., 2024), ScreenSpot Pro (Li et al., 2025b), OSWorldG(Xie et al., 2025a)) and assess decision-making abilities through online environment evaluations (AndroidWorld (Rawles et al., 2024), OSWorld (Xie et al., 2025c;b)).”
Self-citationOS-Themis: A Scalable Critic Framework for Generalist GUI Rewards
Li, Z., Wu, Z., Zhao, Y., Yang, B., Xie, J., Liu, Z., Liu, Z., Jin, K., Liang, J., Li, Z., et al. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.19191
“Majority Voting predicts a positive outcome when more than half of the models vote positive, All Voting requires all models to vote positive, and Any Voting predicts positive as long as at least one model votes positive.”
InfluentialSelf-citationPerceptionBench: Evaluating Atomic Visual Perception in Multimodal Large Language Models
Lin, Z., Xie, Y., Qu, B., Wang, H., Li, J., Wu, H., Dong, Y., Yang, Z., Zhu, J., Lu, H., et al. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.24957
Self-citationOS-Symphony: A Holistic Framework for Robust and Generalist Computer-Using Agent
Yang, B., Jin, K., Wu, Z., Liu, Z., Sun, Q., Li, Z., Xie, J., Liu, Z., Xu, F., Cheng, K., et al. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.07779
“5-72B , Holo2-30B-A3B (Company, 2025), GTA1-32B (Yang et al., 2025a) and GroundNext-7B (Feizi et al., 2025).”
InfluentialSelf-citation
- Authors
- Xie, T., Deng, J., Li, X., Yang, J., Wu, H., Chen, J., Hu, W., Wang, X., Xu, Y., Wang, Z., Xu, Y., Wang, J., Sahoo, D., Yu, T., & Xiong, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Nanjing University (CN)
- Salesforce (United States) (US)
- Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
- Alibaba Group (China) (CN)
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2025
- Pages
- 27405-27462
- ISSN
- 1049-5258 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2505.13227
- OpenAlex
- W4417287263
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7
- FWCI
- 5.29
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- neural information processing systems (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Keywords
- computer-use agents, multiscale modeling, compositional generalization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review