The Energy Cost of Reasoning: Analyzing Energy Usage in LLMs with Test-time Compute
Open accessAbstract
Scaling large language models (LLMs) has driven significant advancements, yet it faces diminishing returns and escalating energy demands. This work explores how test-time compute (TTC) can serve as an energy-efficient complement to conventional scaling strategies by allocating additional computational resources at inference time rather than during training. Specifically, we investigate whether employing TTC can achieve superior accuracy-energy trade-offs compared to simply increasing model size. Our empirical analysis reveals that TTC surpasses traditional model scaling in accuracy/energy efficiency, with notable gains in tasks demanding complex reasoning rather than mere factual recall. Further, we identify a critical interaction between TTC performance and output sequence length, demonstrating that strategically adjusting compute resources at inference time according to query complexity can substantially enhance efficiency. Our findings advocate for TTC as a promising direction, enabling more sustainable, accurate, and adaptable deployment of future language models.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Jin et al. (2025) showed that scaling test-time compute can be more energy-efficient than scaling model parameters.
“Jin et al. (2025) showed that scaling test-time compute can be more energy-efficient than scaling model parameters.”
From Multi-Agent Reasoning Improves Compute Efficiency: Pareto-Optimal Test-Time Scaling (2026) · cites this paper as Jin et al., 2025
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Research works printed but not linked: 31
- Josh Achiam, Steven Adler, Sandhini Agarwal, Lama Ahmad, Ilge Akkaya, Florencia Leoni Aleman, Diogo Almeida, Janko Altenschmidt, Sam Altman, Shyamal Anadkat, et al. Gpt-4 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774 , 2023. · arXiv
- Jacob Austin, Augustus Odena, Maxwell Nye, Maarten Bosma, Henryk Michalewski, David Dohan, Ellen Jiang, Carrie Cai, Michael Terry, Quoc Le, and Charles Sutton. Program Synthesis with Large Language Models. arXiv e-prints , art. arXiv:2108.07732, August 2021. doi: 10.48550/arXiv. 2108.07732. · DOI
- Yanxi Chen, Xuchen Pan, Yaliang Li, Bolin Ding, and Jingren Zhou. Ee-llm: Large-scale training and inference of early-exit large language models with 3d parallelism. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.04916 , 2023. · arXiv
- Luciano Del Corro, Allie Del Giorno, Sahaj Agarwal, Bin Yu, Ahmed Awadallah, and Subhabrata Mukherjee. Skipdecode: Autoregressive skip decoding with batching and caching for efficient llm inference. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.02628 , 2023. · arXiv
- Andreea Dutulescu, Stefan Ruseti, Mihai Dascalu, and Danielle Mcnamara. How hard can this question be? an exploratory analysis of features assessing question difficulty using llms. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Educational Data Mining , pages 802-808, 2024.
- Jared Fernandez, Clara Na, Vashisth Tiwari, Yonatan Bisk, Sasha Luccioni, and Emma Strubell. Energy considerations of large language model inference and efficiency optimizations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.17674 , 2025. · arXiv
- Dan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou, Mantas Mazeika, Dawn Song, and Jacob Steinhardt. Measuring massive multitask language understanding. Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , 2021a.
- Dan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Saurav Kadavath, Akul Arora, Steven Basart, Eric Tang, Dawn Song, and Jacob Steinhardt. Measuring mathematical problem solving with the math dataset. In J. Vanschoren and S. Yeung, editors, Proceedings of the Neural Information Processing Systems Track on Datasets and Benchmarks , volume 1, 2021b. URL https://datasets-benchmarks-proceedings.neurips.cc/paper\_files/paper/ 2021/file/be83ab3ecd0db773eb2dc1b0a17836a1-Paper-round2.pdf .
- Robert Irvine, Douglas Boubert, Vyas Raina, Adian Liusie, Ziyi Zhu, Vineet Mudupalli, Aliaksei Korshuk, Zongyi Liu, Fritz Cremer, Valentin Assassi, Christie-Carol Beauchamp, Xiaoding Lu, Thomas Rialan, and William Beauchamp. Rewarding Chatbots for Real-World Engagement with Millions of Users. arXiv e-prints , art. arXiv:2303.06135, March 2023. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2303. 06135. · DOI
- Ryo Kamoi, Yusen Zhang, Nan Zhang, Jiawei Han, and Rui Zhang. When Can LLMs Actually Correct Their Own Mistakes? A Critical Survey of Self-Correction of LLMs. arXiv e-prints , art. arXiv:2406.01297, June 2024. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2406.01297. · DOI · Paper page
- Yaniv Leviathan, Matan Kalman, and Yossi Matias. Fast inference from transformers via speculative decoding. In Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning , ICML'23. JMLR.org, 2023.
- Dancheng Liu, Amir Nassereldine, Ziming Yang, Chenhui Xu, Yuting Hu, Jiajie Li, Utkarsh Kumar, Changjae Lee, Ruiyang Qin, Yiyu Shi, and Jinjun Xiong. Large Language Models have Intrinsic Self-Correction Ability. arXiv e-prints , art. arXiv:2406.15673, June 2024. doi: 10.48550/arXiv. 2406.15673. · DOI
- Sasha Luccioni, Yacine Jernite, and Emma Strubell. Power hungry processing: Watts driving the cost of ai deployment? In Proceedings of the 2024 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency , pages 85-99, 2024.
- Jae-Woo Park, Seong-Jin Park, Hyun-Sik Won, and Kang-Min Kim. Large language models are students at various levels: Zero-shot question difficulty estimation. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024 , pages 8157-8177, 2024.
- Pratyush Patel, Esha Choukse, Chaojie Zhang, Íñigo Goiri, Brijesh Warrier, Nithish Mahalingam, and Ricardo Bianchini. Characterizing power management opportunities for llms in the cloud. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, Volume 3 , pages 207-222, 2024.
- David Patterson, Joseph Gonzalez, Urs Hölzle, Quoc Le, Chen Liang, Lluis-Miquel Munguia, Daniel Rothchild, David R So, Maud Texier, and Jeff Dean. The carbon footprint of machine learning training will plateau, then shrink. Computer , 55(7):18-28, 2022.
- David Rein, Betty Li Hou, Asa Cooper Stickland, Jackson Petty, Richard Yuanzhe Pang, Julien Dirani, Julian Michael, and Samuel R Bowman. Gpqa: A graduate-level google-proof q&a benchmark. In First Conference on Language Modeling , 2024.
- Andreas Säuberli and Simon Clematide. Automatic Generation and Evaluation of Reading Comprehension Test Items with Large Language Models. arXiv e-prints , art. arXiv:2404.07720, April 2024. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2404.07720. · DOI
- Avi Singh, John D Co-Reyes, Rishabh Agarwal, Ankesh Anand, Piyush Patil, Xavier Garcia, Peter J Liu, James Harrison, Jaehoon Lee, Kelvin Xu, et al. Beyond human data: Scaling self-training for problem-solving with language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.06585 , 2023. · arXiv
- Jovan Stojkovic, Esha Choukse, Chaojie Zhang, Inigo Goiri, and Josep Torrellas. Towards greener llms: Bringing energy-efficiency to the forefront of llm inference. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.20306 , 2024. · arXiv
- Emma Strubell, Ananya Ganesh, and Andrew McCallum. Energy and policy considerations for modern deep learning research. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence , volume 34, pages 13693-13696, 2020.
- Gemini Team, Rohan Anil, Sebastian Borgeaud, Jean-Baptiste Alayrac, Jiahui Yu, Radu Soricut, Johan Schalkwyk, Andrew M Dai, Anja Hauth, Katie Millican, et al. Gemini: a family of highly capable multimodal models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.11805 , 2023. · arXiv
- Surat Teerapittayanon, Bradley McDanel, and Hsiang-Tsung Kung. Branchynet: Fast inference via early exiting from deep neural networks. In 2016 23rd international conference on pattern recognition (ICPR) , pages 2464-2469. IEEE, 2016.
- Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems , 30, 2017.
- Carole-Jean Wu, Ramya Raghavendra, Udit Gupta, Bilge Acun, Newsha Ardalani, Kiwan Maeng, Gloria Chang, Fiona Aga, Jinshi Huang, Charles Bai, et al. Sustainable ai: Environmental implications, challenges and opportunities. Proceedings of Machine Learning and Systems , 4: 795-813, 2022.
- Yanran Wu, Inez Hua, and Yi Ding. Unveiling environmental impacts of large language model serving: A functional unit view. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.11256 , 2025. · arXiv
- Mayi Xu, Yongqi Li, Ke Sun, and Tieyun Qian. Adaption-of-thought: Learning question difficulty improves large language models for reasoning. In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , pages 5468-5495, 2024.
- Eric Zelikman, Yuhuai Wu, Jesse Mu, and Noah D Goodman. Star: Bootstrapping reasoning with reasoning, 2022. URL https://arxiv. org/abs/2203.14465 , 2203, 2022.
- Lianmin Zheng, Liangsheng Yin, Zhiqiang Xie, Chuyue Sun, Jeff Huang, Cody Hao Yu, Shiyi Cao, Christos Kozyrakis, Ion Stoica, Joseph E. Gonzalez, Clark Barrett, and Ying Sheng. Sglang: Efficient execution of structured language model programs. In A. Globerson, L. Mackey, D. Belgrave, A. Fan, U. Paquet, J. Tomczak, and C. Zhang, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume 37, pages 62557-62583. Curran Associates, Inc., 2024. URL https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper\_files/paper/2024/file/ 724be4472168f31ba1c9ac630f15dec8-Paper-Conference.pdf .
- Yinmin Zhong, Shengyu Liu, Junda Chen, Jianbo Hu, Yibo Zhu, Xuanzhe Liu, Xin Jin, and Hao Zhang. DistServe: Disaggregating Prefill and Decoding for Goodput-optimized Large Language Model Serving. arXiv e-prints , art. arXiv:2401.09670, January 2024. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2401. 09670. · DOI
- Wangchunshu Zhou, Canwen Xu, Tao Ge, Julian McAuley, Ke Xu, and Furu Wei. Bert loses patience: Fast and robust inference with early exit. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 33: 18330-18341, 2020.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Multi-Agent Reasoning Improves Compute Efficiency: Pareto-Optimal Test-Time Scaling
Wunderlich, F. V., Kaesberg, L. B., Wahle, J. P., Ruas, T., & Gipp, B. (2026) · Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 4: Student Research Workshop) · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.acl-srw.1
“In contrast, prior work has reported that smaller models enhanced with test-time compute techniques, such as majority vote, can outperform substantially larger models relying solely on scale (Jin et al., 2025).”
Influential
- Authors
- Jin, Y., Wei, G.-Y., & Brooks, D.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2025
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2505.14733
- OpenAlex
- W4415320257
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Green IT and Sustainability
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Energy Efficiency in Computing
- Keywords
- large language models, test-time compute, energy efficiency, inference latency, energy-accuracy trade-off, model scaling, reasoning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
