The Agentic Economy
Open accessAbstract
Generative AI has transformed human-computer interaction by enabling natural language interfaces and the emergence of autonomous agents capable of acting on users' behalf. While early applications have improved individual productivity, these gains have largely been confined to predefined tasks within existing workflows. We argue that the more profound economic impact lies in reducing communication frictions between consumers and businesses. This shift could reorganize markets, redistribute power, and catalyze the creation of new products and services. We explore the implications of an agentic economy, where assistant agents act on behalf of consumers and service agents represent businesses, interacting programmatically to facilitate transactions. A key distinction we draw is between unscripted interactions -- enabled by technical advances in natural language and protocol design -- and unrestricted interactions, which depend on market structures and governance. We examine the current limitations of siloed and end-to-end agents, and explore future scenarios shaped by technical standards and market dynamics. These include the potential tension between agentic walled gardens and an open web of agents, implications for advertising and discovery, the evolution of micro-transactions, and the unbundling and rebundling of digital goods. Ultimately, we argue that the architecture of agentic communication will determine the extent to which generative AI democratizes access to economic opportunity.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Platforms might restrict direct access to their services, requiring users to go through their preferred agent intermediaries.
“Ultimately, platforms might even restrict direct access to their services, requiring users to go through their preferred agent intermediaries (Rothschild et al. 2025).”
From The Coasean Singularity? Demand, Supply, and Market Design with AI Agents (2025) · cites this paper as Rothschild et al. 2025
Section 3.2 (page unavailable) says firms might restrict which agents can communicate and describes Meta service agents accessible only on Meta’s platforms. That supports the possibility of platform-controlled access, but it does not say platforms might block users’ direct access to their services or require users to use preferred agent intermediaries. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredTwo-sided agentic markets promise to generate added value by reducing communication costs and information asymmetries.
“Two-sided agentic markets promise to generate added value by reducing communication costs and information asymmetries”
From Magentic Marketplace: An Open-Source Environment for Studying Agentic Markets (2025) · cites this paper as Rothschild et al., 2025
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Gary S. Becker and Kevin M. Murphy. 1992. The Division of Labor, Coordination Costs, and Knowledge*. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 107, 4 (11 1992), 1137-1160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118383 arXiv:https://academic.oup.com/qje/article-pdf/107/4/1137/5225485/107-4-1137.pdf · DOI
- Timothy F. Bresnahan and M. Trajtenberg. 1995. General purpose technologies 'Engines of growth'? Journal of Econometrics 65, 1 (1995), 83-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01598-T · DOI · Paper page
- Erik Brynjolfsson, Danielle Li, and Lindsey Raymond. 2025. Generative AI at work. The Quarterly Journal of Economics (2025), qjae044.
- Zheyuan Kevin Cui, Mert Demirer, Sonia Jaffe, Leon Musolff, Sida Peng, and Tobias Salz. 2024. The effects of generative ai on high skilled work: Evidence from three field experiments with software developers. Available at SSRN 4945566 (2024).
- Paul Klemperer. 1995. Competition when consumers have switching costs: An overview with applications to industrial organization, macroeconomics, and international trade. The review of economic studies 62, 4 (1995), 515-539.
- Marc Rysman. 2009. The economics of two-sided markets. Journal of economic perspectives 23, 3 (2009), 125-143.
- Aidan Toner-Rodgers. 2024. Artificial intelligence, scientific discovery, and product innovation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.17866 (2024). · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Coasean Singularity? Demand, Supply, and Market Design with AI Agents
Shahidi, P., Rusak, G., Manning, B., Fradkin, A., & Horton, J. (2025) · doi:10.3386/w34468 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Magentic Marketplace: An Open-Source Environment for Studying Agentic Markets
Bansal, G., Hua, W., Huang, Z., Fourney, A., Swearngin, A., Epperson, W., Payne, T., Hofman, J. M., Lucier, B., Singh, C., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.25779
Self-citation
- Authors
- Rothschild, D. M., Mobius, M., Hofman, J. M., Dillon, E. W., Goldstein, D. G., Immorlica, N., Jaffe, S., Lucier, B., Slivkins, A., & Vogel, M.
- Affiliations
- Microsoft Research New York City (United States) (US)
- Microsoft (United States) (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2025
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 39-42
- ISSN
- 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2505.15799
- OpenAlex
- W7125957219
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 81.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Communications of the ACM (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology's Impact on Media
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Keywords
- generative AI, AI agents, economic opportunities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review