PreprintCited by 23Ethics and Social Impacts of AITechnology's Impact on MediaArtificial Intelligence Applications

The Agentic Economy

Open access
Rothschild, David M., Mobius, Markus, Hofman, Jake M., Dillon, Eleanor W., Goldstein, Daniel G., Immorlica, Nicole, Jaffe, Sonia, Lucier, Brendan +2 more·2025·arXiv

Abstract

Generative AI has transformed human-computer interaction by enabling natural language interfaces and the emergence of autonomous agents capable of acting on users' behalf. While early applications have improved individual productivity, these gains have largely been confined to predefined tasks within existing workflows. We argue that the more profound economic impact lies in reducing communication frictions between consumers and businesses. This shift could reorganize markets, redistribute power, and catalyze the creation of new products and services. We explore the implications of an agentic economy, where assistant agents act on behalf of consumers and service agents represent businesses, interacting programmatically to facilitate transactions. A key distinction we draw is between unscripted interactions -- enabled by technical advances in natural language and protocol design -- and unrestricted interactions, which depend on market structures and governance. We examine the current limitations of siloed and end-to-end agents, and explore future scenarios shaped by technical standards and market dynamics. These include the potential tension between agentic walled gardens and an open web of agents, implications for advertising and discovery, the evolution of micro-transactions, and the unbundling and rebundling of digital goods. Ultimately, we argue that the architecture of agentic communication will determine the extent to which generative AI democratizes access to economic opportunity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2505.15799

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Platforms might restrict direct access to their services, requiring users to go through their preferred agent intermediaries.

    “Ultimately, platforms might even restrict direct access to their services, requiring users to go through their preferred agent intermediaries (Rothschild et al. 2025).”

    From The Coasean Singularity? Demand, Supply, and Market Design with AI Agents (2025) · cites this paper as Rothschild et al. 2025

    Section 3.2 (page unavailable) says firms might restrict which agents can communicate and describes Meta service agents accessible only on Meta’s platforms. That supports the possibility of platform-controlled access, but it does not say platforms might block users’ direct access to their services or require users to use preferred agent intermediaries. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Two-sided agentic markets promise to generate added value by reducing communication costs and information asymmetries.

    “Two-sided agentic markets promise to generate added value by reducing communication costs and information asymmetries”

    From Magentic Marketplace: An Open-Source Environment for Studying Agentic Markets (2025) · cites this paper as Rothschild et al., 2025

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Gary S. Becker and Kevin M. Murphy. 1992. The Division of Labor, Coordination Costs, and Knowledge*. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 107, 4 (11 1992), 1137-1160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118383 arXiv:https://academic.oup.com/qje/article-pdf/107/4/1137/5225485/107-4-1137.pdf · DOI
  2. Timothy F. Bresnahan and M. Trajtenberg. 1995. General purpose technologies 'Engines of growth'? Journal of Econometrics 65, 1 (1995), 83-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01598-T · DOI · Paper page
  3. Erik Brynjolfsson, Danielle Li, and Lindsey Raymond. 2025. Generative AI at work. The Quarterly Journal of Economics (2025), qjae044.
  4. Zheyuan Kevin Cui, Mert Demirer, Sonia Jaffe, Leon Musolff, Sida Peng, and Tobias Salz. 2024. The effects of generative ai on high skilled work: Evidence from three field experiments with software developers. Available at SSRN 4945566 (2024).
  5. Paul Klemperer. 1995. Competition when consumers have switching costs: An overview with applications to industrial organization, macroeconomics, and international trade. The review of economic studies 62, 4 (1995), 515-539.
  6. Marc Rysman. 2009. The economics of two-sided markets. Journal of economic perspectives 23, 3 (2009), 125-143.
  7. Aidan Toner-Rodgers. 2024. Artificial intelligence, scientific discovery, and product innovation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.17866 (2024). · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rothschild, D. M., Mobius, M., Hofman, J. M., Dillon, E. W., Goldstein, D. G., Immorlica, N., Jaffe, S., Lucier, B., Slivkins, A., & Vogel, M.
Affiliations
  • Microsoft Research New York City (United States) (US)
  • Microsoft (United States) (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2025
Volume
69
Issue
2
Pages
39-42
ISSN
0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7125957219
Cited by
23
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 2
FWCI
81.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Communications of the ACM (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology's Impact on Media
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
Keywords
generative AI, AI agents, economic opportunities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review