PreprintCited by 21Multi-Agent Systems and NegotiationEthics and Social Impacts of AIArtificial Intelligence Applications

Magentic Marketplace: An Open-Source Environment for Studying Agentic Markets

Open access
Bansal, Gagan, Hua, Wenyue, Huang, Zezhou, Fourney, Adam, Swearngin, Amanda, Epperson, Will, Payne, Tyler, Hofman, Jake M. +16 more·2025·arXiv

Abstract

As LLM agents advance, they are increasingly mediating economic decisions, ranging from product discovery to transactions, on behalf of users. Such applications promise benefits but also raise many questions about agent accountability and value for users. Addressing these questions requires understanding how agents behave in realistic market conditions. However, previous research has largely evaluated agents in constrained settings, such as single-task marketplaces (e.g., negotiation) or structured two-agent interactions. Real-world markets are fundamentally different: they require agents to handle diverse economic activities and coordinate within large, dynamic ecosystems where multiple agents with opaque behaviors may engage in open-ended dialogues. To bridge this gap, we investigate two-sided agentic marketplaces where Assistant agents represent consumers and Service agents represent competing businesses. To study these interactions safely, we develop Magentic-Marketplace -- a simulated environment where Assistants and Services can operate. This environment enables us to study key market dynamics: the utility agents achieve, behavioral biases, vulnerability to manipulation, and how search mechanisms shape market outcomes. Our experiments show that frontier models can approach optimal welfare -- but only under ideal search conditions. Performance degrades sharply with scale, and all models exhibit severe first-proposal bias, creating 10-30x advantages for response speed over quality. These findings reveal how behaviors emerge across market conditions, informing the design of fair and efficient agentic marketplaces.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

Magentic Marketplace is an open-source simulated two-sided agentic marketplace where Assistant agents represent consumers and Service agents represent businesses, supporting search, communication, negotiation, and transactions. Experiments with frontier and open-source LLMs show near-optimal welfare under perfect search but sharp degradation with larger consideration sets and severe first-proposal bias, plus model-dependent manipulation vulnerabilities.

Key findings

  • Under perfect search, GPT-4.1 and Gemini-2.5-Flash come very close to optimal consumer welfare and surpass the baseline of randomly selecting among businesses matching all menu items and amenities; under realistic lexical search, proprietary models still outperform random and cheapest-without-amenities baselines.
  • Larger consideration sets reduce welfare: GPT-4o declines by 4.3% when given 100 versus 3 search results (Mexican 100–300), while Sonnet-4 declines 65.4% and GPT-5 declines 44% on Mexican 100–300 (GPT-5 with minimal reasoning).
  • First-proposal bias is severe across models: first proposals achieve selection rates of 60–100% versus near-zero for third proposals, a 10–30x advantage for response speed over quality; GPT-4.1 in the contractor scenario still selected first proposals at 60% versus 13.3% for third proposals (4.5x advantage).
  • Manipulation resistance varies: frontier models GPT-4.1, Sonnet-4.5, and Gemini-2.5-Flash kept mean payments to manipulated businesses typically under 1.0 out of 3.0, with Sonnet-4.5 strongest; Gemini-2.5-Flash showed vulnerability to strong prompt injection in the Mexican scenario with mean payment dropping to 1.6, while GPT-4o, GPT-OSS-20B, and Qwen3-4B-2507 were significantly vulnerable.

Methods

  • The environment uses an HTTP/REST client-server architecture with three endpoints (`/register`, `/protocol`, `/action`) and five actions: search, send text messages, send order proposals, send payments, and receive messages; Assistant agents initiate discovery and payments, Service agents respond with text and order proposals.
  • Experiments use fully synthetic data in restaurant and contractor domains, with two market scales: small (33 customers, 99 businesses) and medium (100 customers, 300 businesses); consumers issue natural-language requests specifying 1–3 desired items/services, 1–2 amenity requirements, and target prices.
  • Satisfaction is all-or-nothing; consumer utility is value minus price, with value set to α times the average price of desired items and α = 2. Experiments compare welfare across baselines (random with items only, cheapest with items and prices, random with items and amenities, optimal) and agentic conditions (lexical search, perfect search), with 5 independent runs reporting mean and standard deviation.

Limitations

  • Stated: experiments focused on static markets where neither agents nor the environment were required to learn or adapt to the history of requests and outcomes; dynamic effects, repeated interactions, and learning are left as future extensions.
  • Stated: the current study uses fully synthetic data (e.g., Mexican restaurants and contractors) for experimental control, reproducibility, and safe exploration, though the environment is extensible to other synthetic domains and public/open datasets.
  • Stated: Qwen3-14b’s poor performance may partly stem from prompt-model misalignment, but manual analysis of seven trials revealed more fundamental failure modes; consideration-set experiments used GPT-5 with minimal reasoning. Evident: only two synthetic domains and no human participants limit external validity to real-world, mixed human-AI, and dynamic markets.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2510.25779

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

2 of 4 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation
    § Magentic Marketplace Environment · p. 2

    Current research on agentic systems has focused mainly on individual agent performance and structured interactions between agents for isolated economic tasks.

    “Current research on agentic systems has focused mainly on individual agent performance and structured interactions between agents for isolated economic tasks (Wang et al., 2024; Buscemi et al., 2025; Mao et al., 2025; Abdelnabi et al., 2024).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Wang et al., 2024 source

      The survey discusses individual GUI-agent performance, including task-completion success rates (2 GUI Agent Data Resources, page unavailable), and describes a multi-agent architecture (Learning-based, page unavailable). It does not establish that agentic-systems research has focused mainly on structured interactions between agents for isolated economic tasks; its examples also span social forums, software development, and mobile applications. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Buscemi et al., 2025 source

      The Introduction (p. 2) describes structured interactions among three LLM agents in a game-theoretic regulatory setting, so the paper supports that part of the sentence. It does not establish that current agentic-systems research focuses mainly on individual agent performance or isolated economic tasks; its own task models a regulatory ecosystem. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Mao et al., 2025

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Findingown data
    § ABSTRACT · p. 1

    All models exhibit severe first-proposal bias.

    “all models exhibit severe first-proposal bias”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingreasoning
    § ABSTRACT · p. 1

    First-proposal bias creates 10-30x advantages for response speed over quality.

    “creating 10-30x advantages for response speed over quality”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § ABSTRACT · p. 1

    Performance degrades sharply with scale.

    “Performance degrades sharply with scale”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingreasoning
    § 3.2 Implementation Overview · p. 5

    Platform extensibility is supported through the protocol discovery mechanism.

    “The second objective, platform extensibility , is supported through the protocol discovery mechanism”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 26
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 21
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § ABSTRACT · p. 1

    Frontier models can approach optimal welfare, but only under ideal search conditions.

    “Our experiments show that frontier models can approach optimal welfare-but only under ideal search conditions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 5.3 Manipulation Resistance · p. 13

    GPT-OSS-20B and Qwen3-4B-2507 proved particularly vulnerable, with authority appeals and social proof tactics successfully increasing payments to manipulated businesses.

    “GPT-OSS-20B and Qwen3-4B-2507 proved particularly vulnerable, with authority appeals and social proof tactics successfully increasing payments to manipulated businesses.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 5.3 Manipulation Resistance · p. 12

    GPT-4.1, Sonnet-4.5, and Gemini-2.5-Flash maintained relatively stable performance across most manipulation conditions, with mean payments to manipulated businesses remaining low, typically under 1.0 out of 3.0 possible.

    “GPT-4.1, Sonnet-4.5, and Gemini-2.5-Flash maintained relatively stable performance across most manipulation conditions , with mean payments to manipulated businesses remaining low, typically under 1.0 out of 3.0 possible.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § 3.2 Implementation Overview · p. 5

    The architecture achieves both design objectives effectively.

    “This architecture achieves both design objectives effectively.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingnone given
    § Magentic Marketplace Environment · p. 2

    The environment supports the full transaction lifecycle: from search and matching to negotiation and transaction.

    “The environment supports the full transaction lifecycle: from search and matching to negotiation and transaction”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 5.3 Manipulation Resistance · p. 12

    GPT-4.1 and Gemini-2.5-Flash showed similar resilience, though Gemini-2.5-Flash displayed some vulnerability to strong prompt injection attacks in the Mexican restaurant scenario with mean payment dropping to 1.6.

    “GPT-4.1 and Gemini-2.5-Flash showed similar resilience, though Gemini-2.5-Flash displayed some vulnerability to strong prompt injection attacks in the Mexican restaurant scenario with mean payment dropping to 1.6.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § Magentic Marketplace Environment · p. 2

    The environment is extensible: it supports additional synthetic domains and public/open datasets.

    “But the environment is extensible: it supports additional synthetic domains and public/open datasets”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 5.3 Manipulation Resistance · p. 13

    GPT-4o, GPT-OSS-20B, and Qwen3-4B-2507 fell victim to prompt injection attacks which often redirect all payments to manipulative agents.

    “These models not only fell victim to prompt injection attacks which often redirect all payments to manipulative agents, but also showed increased payments to malicious actors under traditional psychological manipulation conditions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 6 Discussion · p. 15

    Our experiments reveal significant behavioral variations across agent models, including differential abilities to process noisy search results and varying susceptibility to manipulation tactics, with performance gaps widening as market complexity increases.

    “Our experiments reveal significant behavioral variations across agent models, including differential abilities to process noisy search results and varying susceptibility to manipulation tactics, with performance gaps widening as market complexity increases.”
    • Also stated in: § 7 Conclusion · p. 16 · plain
      “Our experiments reveal significant behavioral variations across agent models, including differential abilities to process noisy search results and varying susceptibility to manipulation tactics, with performance gaps widening as market complexity increases.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 5.4 Agent Behavior Biases · p. 13

    Qwen3-4B exhibited severe position bias, selecting the third-listed business 57.1% of the time in Mexican restaurant searches and 66.7% in contractor searches-more than double the expected rate under random selection.

    “However, Qwen3-4B exhibited severe position bias, selecting the third-listed business 57.1% of the time in Mexican restaurant searches and 66.7% in contractor searches-more than double the expected rate under random selection.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingreasoning
    § 3.1 Environment Design Goals · p. 4

    Agents discover matches through conversational exchanges.

    “agents discover matches through conversational exchanges”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § These comparisons allow us to pinpoint whether performance bottlenecks arise from search quality, incomplete information, or the complexity of agent decision-making. · p. 10

    Both GPT-OSS-20b and Qwen3-4b-2507 perform competitively under perfect search, approaching proprietary model performance.

    “Both GPT-OSS-20b and Qwen3-4b-2507 perform competitively under perfect search, approaching proprietary model performance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given
    § 3.2 Implementation Overview · p. 6

    These actions create asymmetric capabilities reflecting current marketplace dynamics.

    “These actions create asymmetric capabilities reflecting current marketplace dynamics.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § 3.1 Environment Design Goals · p. 4

    Assistant Agents don't initially know which businesses can fulfill requests or at what price, while Service Agents don't know customers' budgets or preferences.

    “Assistant Agents don't initially know which businesses can fulfill requests or at what price, while Service Agents don't know customers' budgets or preferences”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 5.4 Agent Behavior Biases · p. 13

    GPT4o and Sonnet-4.5 showed the most extreme behavior in certain conditions, achieving 100% first-proposal selection rates.

    “GPT4o and Sonnet-4.5 showed the most extreme behavior in certain conditions, achieving 100% first-proposal selection rates-meaning these agents never waited to compare alternatives once receiving an initial offer.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § These comparisons allow us to pinpoint whether performance bottlenecks arise from search quality, incomplete information, or the complexity of agent decision-making. · p. 10

    GPT-OSS-20b outperforms GPT-4o in both lexical search and perfect search in the Mexican dataset.

    “Notice that GPT-OSS-20b outperforms GPT-4o in both lexical search and perfect search in Mexican dataset; and Qwen3-4b-2507 performed close to GPT-4o as well in Contractors dataset.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 5.4 Agent Behavior Biases · p. 13

    The experiment results reveal extreme first-mover advantages across all models, with first proposals achieving selection rates between 60-100% compared to near-zero selection for third proposals.

    “The experiment results reveal extreme first-mover advantages across all models, with first proposals achieving selection rates between 60-100% compared to near-zero selection for third proposals.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § These comparisons allow us to pinpoint whether performance bottlenecks arise from search quality, incomplete information, or the complexity of agent decision-making. · p. 9

    Under Agentic: Perfect search, GPT-4.1 and Gemini-2.5-Flash come very close to the optimal outcome and even surpass the baseline of randomly selecting among businesses that match all menu items and amenities.

    “In this setting, GPT-4.1 and Gemini-2.5.-Flash come very close to the optimal outcome (the dashed line in Figure 4) and even surpass the baseline of randomly selecting among businesses that match all menu items and amenities.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § 7 Conclusion · p. 16

    We developed Magentic Marketplace an open-source, extensible platform for studying agentic economies through controlled experimentation, addressing the critical need for robust testing before real-world deployment.

    “We developed Magentic Marketplace an open-source, extensible platform for studying agentic economies through controlled experimentation, addressing the critical need for robust testing before real-world deployment.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 5.4 Agent Behavior Biases · p. 14

    This behavior pattern potentially lead to suboptimal matches between consumers and service providers while creating an arms race for response speed at the expense of other valuable market attributes.

    “This behavior pattern potentially lead to suboptimal matches between consumers and service providers while creating an arms race for response speed at the expense of other valuable market attributes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 6 Discussion · p. 15

    These results suggest benefits to human-in-the-loop designs where agents assist rather than replace human decision-making, particularly for high-stakes transactions.

    “These results suggest benefits to human-in-the-loop designs where agents assist rather than replace human decision-making, particularly for high-stakes transactions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given
    § 4.2 Evaluation · p. 8

    All experiments were conducted with 5 independent runs, with mean and standard deviation reported.

    “All experiments were conducted with 5 independent runs, with mean and standard deviation reported.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given
    § 6 Discussion · p. 14

    Our experiments focused on static markets in which neither the agents nor the environment were required to learn or adapt to the history of requests and outcomes.

    “We note that our experiments focused on static markets in which neither the agents nor the environment were required to learn or adapt to the history of requests and outcomes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisereasoning
    § Magentic Marketplace Environment · p. 2

    Agent-to-agent interaction can overcome information asymmetry by inexpensively engaging in conversation to explore the full range of possible options, generating value for both consumers and businesses.

    “Agent-to-agent interaction, however, can overcome such an asymmetry by inexpensively engaging in conversation to explore the full range of possible options, generating value for both consumers and businesses.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Humans cannot discover bespoke configurations without costly communication.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § 6 Discussion · p. 15

    The utility model used to evaluate each agent's performance is fully flexible, so agents of different types can be associated with simulated users with different preferences, goals, and constraints.

    “Crucially, the utility model used to evaluate each agent's performance is fully flexible, so agents of different types can be associated with simulated users with different preferences, goals, and constraints.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data
    § 5.4 Agent Behavior Biases · p. 13

    The consistency of this pattern across both proprietary frontier models and open-source alternatives indicates this is not merely a training artifact but potentially a deeper limitation in how current language models handle temporal decision sequences.

    “The consistency of this pattern across both proprietary frontier models and open-source alternatives indicates this is not merely a training artifact but potentially a deeper limitation in how current language models handle temporal decision sequences.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning
    § 6 Discussion · p. 15

    Magentic Marketplace can be extended to settings where human users can choose whether to participate directly in the market or delegate to an agentic proxy.

    “But Magentic Marketplace can be extended to settings where human users can choose whether to participate directly in the market or delegate to an agentic proxy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning
    § 6 Discussion · p. 15

    The Magentic Marketplace is also extensible beyond two-sided agentic markets that match consumers with businesses.

    “The Magentic Marketplace is also extensible beyond two-sided agentic markets that match consumers with businesses.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning
    § 6 Discussion · p. 15

    This flexibility makes it possible to explore many different market contexts using the Magentic Marketplace environment and infrastructure.

    “This flexibility makes it possible to explore many different market contexts using the Magentic Marketplace environment and infrastructure.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning
    § 6 Discussion · p. 15

    The Magentic Marketplace architecture supports such collaborative patterns, allowing humans to retain control of critical actions while gradually increasing agent autonomy as trustworthiness improves.

    “The Magentic Marketplace architecture supports such collaborative patterns, allowing humans to retain control of critical actions while gradually increasing agent autonomy as trustworthiness improves.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given
    § Menu features: · p. 8

    The pipeline is fully configurable for reproducibility, and can be extended to other domains or real-world datasets by mapping to the same schema.

    “The pipeline is fully configurable for reproducibility, and can be extended to other domains ( e.g. , travel, retail) or real-world datasets by mapping to the same schema.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § 6 Discussion · p. 15

    Our environment distinguishes between human users and their AI agents, creating principal-agent relationships where welfare loss stems from agents' mistakes rather than misaligned incentives.

    “Our environment distinguishes between human users and their AI agents, creating principal-agent relationships where welfare loss stems from agents' mistakes rather than misaligned incentives.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § 6 Discussion · p. 15

    The same protocol - search, negotiate, pay - would work regardless of whether the 'agent' is AI or a human user.

    “The same protocol - search, negotiate, pay - would work regardless of whether the 'agent' is AI or a human user.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning
    § 6 Discussion · p. 15

    This also makes it possible to simulate a two-sided market where AI agents appear only on one side of the market, such as human consumers navigating conversations and transactions with LLM-powered service agents.

    “This also makes it possible to simulate a two-sided market where AI agents appear only on one side of the market, such as human consumers navigating conversations and transactions with LLM-powered service agents.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Magentic Marketplace Environment · p. 2

    Two-sided agentic markets promise to generate added value by reducing communication costs and information asymmetries.

    “Two-sided agentic markets promise to generate added value by reducing communication costs and information asymmetries”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rothschild et al., 2025 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 6 Discussion · p. 14

    When agents show first-proposal bias, search ordering becomes critical; when vulnerable to manipulation, trust systems become essential.

    “When agents show first-proposal bias, search ordering becomes critical; when vulnerable to manipulation, trust systems become essential.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 5.4 Agent Behavior Biases · p. 14

    Businesses gain more from investing in faster response systems than improving their offerings, as even superior late-arriving proposals are effectively excluded from consideration.

    “Businesses gain more from investing in faster response systems than improving their offerings, as even superior late-arriving proposals are effectively excluded from consideration.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data
    § 5.4 Agent Behavior Biases · p. 13

    Proposal bias represents a universal and severe market distortion.

    “Proposal bias represents a universal and severe market distortion.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Interpretationown data
    § 5.4 Agent Behavior Biases · p. 13

    GPT4o and Sonnet-4.5 never waited to compare alternatives once receiving an initial offer.

    “GPT4o and Sonnet-4.5 showed the most extreme behavior in certain conditions, achieving 100% first-proposal selection rates-meaning these agents never waited to compare alternatives once receiving an initial offer.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § 3.1 Environment Design Goals · p. 4

    When multiple businesses offer similar services, competition on price and quality benefits consumers, and vice-versa.

    “when multiple businesses offer similar services, competition on price and quality benefits consumers, and vice-versa”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
40 of 40
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Real-world markets require agents to handle diverse economic activities and coordinate within large, dynamic ecosystems where multiple agents with opaque behaviors may engage in open-ended dialogues.

    “Real-world markets are fundamentally different: they require agents to handle diverse economic activities and coordinate within large, dynamic ecosystems where multiple agents with opaque behaviors may engage in open-ended dialogues.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Humans cannot discover bespoke configurations without costly communication.

    “Humans cannot discover bespoke configurations without costly communication ( e.g. , phone calls).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Agents based on frontier models could improve market efficiency.

    “Agents based on frontier models could improve market efficiency”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The fact that frontier models are trained on human digital footprints raises concerns about inherited biases and vulnerabilities.

    “the fact that they are trained on human digital footprints raises concerns about inherited biases and vulnerabilities”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Such models introduce new potential vulnerabilities, such as susceptibility to prompt injection attacks and other forms of manipulation.

    “such models introduce new potential vulnerabilities-such as susceptibility to prompt injection attacks and other forms of manipulation”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The synthetic restaurant and contractor marketplace scenarios adequately represent real-world two-sided markets for drawing conclusions about agentic markets.

    “In this work, we use fully synthetic data to ensure experimental control, reproducibility, and safe exploration of agent behaviors.”
    “To ground our experiments, we focus two domains: restaurants and contractors - though the schema is easily adapted to other retail scenarios.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The LLM agents' behavior in the simulated marketplace is representative of autonomous agents in real two-sided markets.

    “We evaluate both proprietary and open-source models to demonstrate early findings under Magentic Marketplace .”
    “Our results, with baseline ReACT-style agents, indicate that when autonomous agents are equipped with capabilities for discovery, communication, and transaction execution empowered by sufficiently advanced language models, they can effectively mediate between consumers and service providers.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The Magentic Marketplace simulation environment accurately reflects the dynamics of real-world agentic markets.

    “As LLM agents increasingly mediate economic transactions, end-to-end simulation environments like Magentic Marketplace become essential tools for understanding emergent behaviors and designing safe, efficient agentic marketplaces.”
8 of 8

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Claimed 10-30-fold first-proposal advantage conflicts with a reported 4.5-fold case

    Minor

    The paper describes the first-proposal advantage as 10-30-fold across models, but reports a 4.5-fold advantage for GPT-4.1 in the contractor scenario. That example falls outside the stated range.

1 of 1

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Seth Karten, Wenzhe Li, Zihan Ding, Samuel Kleiner, Yu Bai, and Chi Jin. Llm economist: Large population models and mechanism design in multi-agent generative simulacra, 2025a. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2507. 15815 .
  2. Annie Liang. Artificial intelligence clones. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation , pp. 387-388, 2025.
  3. Shaoguang Mao, Yuzhe Cai, Yan Xia, Wenshan Wu, Xun Wang, Fengyi Wang, Qiang Guan, Tao Ge, and Furu Wei. Alympics: Llm agents meet game theory. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Computational Linguistics , pp. 2845-2866, 2025.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bansal, G., Hua, W., Huang, Z., Fourney, A., Swearngin, A., Epperson, W., Payne, T., Hofman, J. M., Lucier, B., Singh, C., Mobius, M., Nambi, A., Yadav, A., Gao, K., Rothschild, D. M., Slivkins, A., Goldstein, D. G., Mozannar, H., Immorlica, N., Murad, M., Vogel, M., Kambhampati, S., Horvitz, E., & Amershi, S.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2025
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7103174989
Cited by
0
References
0
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
Keywords
LLM agents, two-sided markets, consumer agents, service agents, search mechanisms, behavioral biases, welfare, open-source simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-29.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-29.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review