Magentic Marketplace: An Open-Source Environment for Studying Agentic Markets
Open accessAbstract
As LLM agents advance, they are increasingly mediating economic decisions, ranging from product discovery to transactions, on behalf of users. Such applications promise benefits but also raise many questions about agent accountability and value for users. Addressing these questions requires understanding how agents behave in realistic market conditions. However, previous research has largely evaluated agents in constrained settings, such as single-task marketplaces (e.g., negotiation) or structured two-agent interactions. Real-world markets are fundamentally different: they require agents to handle diverse economic activities and coordinate within large, dynamic ecosystems where multiple agents with opaque behaviors may engage in open-ended dialogues. To bridge this gap, we investigate two-sided agentic marketplaces where Assistant agents represent consumers and Service agents represent competing businesses. To study these interactions safely, we develop Magentic-Marketplace -- a simulated environment where Assistants and Services can operate. This environment enables us to study key market dynamics: the utility agents achieve, behavioral biases, vulnerability to manipulation, and how search mechanisms shape market outcomes. Our experiments show that frontier models can approach optimal welfare -- but only under ideal search conditions. Performance degrades sharply with scale, and all models exhibit severe first-proposal bias, creating 10-30x advantages for response speed over quality. These findings reveal how behaviors emerge across market conditions, informing the design of fair and efficient agentic marketplaces.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Magentic Marketplace is an open-source simulated two-sided agentic marketplace where Assistant agents represent consumers and Service agents represent businesses, supporting search, communication, negotiation, and transactions. Experiments with frontier and open-source LLMs show near-optimal welfare under perfect search but sharp degradation with larger consideration sets and severe first-proposal bias, plus model-dependent manipulation vulnerabilities.
Key findings
- Under perfect search, GPT-4.1 and Gemini-2.5-Flash come very close to optimal consumer welfare and surpass the baseline of randomly selecting among businesses matching all menu items and amenities; under realistic lexical search, proprietary models still outperform random and cheapest-without-amenities baselines.
- Larger consideration sets reduce welfare: GPT-4o declines by 4.3% when given 100 versus 3 search results (Mexican 100–300), while Sonnet-4 declines 65.4% and GPT-5 declines 44% on Mexican 100–300 (GPT-5 with minimal reasoning).
- First-proposal bias is severe across models: first proposals achieve selection rates of 60–100% versus near-zero for third proposals, a 10–30x advantage for response speed over quality; GPT-4.1 in the contractor scenario still selected first proposals at 60% versus 13.3% for third proposals (4.5x advantage).
- Manipulation resistance varies: frontier models GPT-4.1, Sonnet-4.5, and Gemini-2.5-Flash kept mean payments to manipulated businesses typically under 1.0 out of 3.0, with Sonnet-4.5 strongest; Gemini-2.5-Flash showed vulnerability to strong prompt injection in the Mexican scenario with mean payment dropping to 1.6, while GPT-4o, GPT-OSS-20B, and Qwen3-4B-2507 were significantly vulnerable.
Methods
- The environment uses an HTTP/REST client-server architecture with three endpoints (`/register`, `/protocol`, `/action`) and five actions: search, send text messages, send order proposals, send payments, and receive messages; Assistant agents initiate discovery and payments, Service agents respond with text and order proposals.
- Experiments use fully synthetic data in restaurant and contractor domains, with two market scales: small (33 customers, 99 businesses) and medium (100 customers, 300 businesses); consumers issue natural-language requests specifying 1–3 desired items/services, 1–2 amenity requirements, and target prices.
- Satisfaction is all-or-nothing; consumer utility is value minus price, with value set to α times the average price of desired items and α = 2. Experiments compare welfare across baselines (random with items only, cheapest with items and prices, random with items and amenities, optimal) and agentic conditions (lexical search, perfect search), with 5 independent runs reporting mean and standard deviation.
Limitations
- Stated: experiments focused on static markets where neither agents nor the environment were required to learn or adapt to the history of requests and outcomes; dynamic effects, repeated interactions, and learning are left as future extensions.
- Stated: the current study uses fully synthetic data (e.g., Mexican restaurants and contractors) for experimental control, reproducibility, and safe exploration, though the environment is extensible to other synthetic domains and public/open datasets.
- Stated: Qwen3-14b’s poor performance may partly stem from prompt-model misalignment, but manual analysis of seven trials revealed more fundamental failure modes; consideration-set experiments used GPT-5 with minimal reasoning. Evident: only two synthetic domains and no human participants limit external validity to real-world, mixed human-AI, and dynamic markets.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
2 of 4 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation§ Magentic Marketplace Environment · p. 2
Current research on agentic systems has focused mainly on individual agent performance and structured interactions between agents for isolated economic tasks.
“Current research on agentic systems has focused mainly on individual agent performance and structured interactions between agents for isolated economic tasks (Wang et al., 2024; Buscemi et al., 2025; Mao et al., 2025; Abdelnabi et al., 2024).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites Wang et al., 2024 source
The survey discusses individual GUI-agent performance, including task-completion success rates (2 GUI Agent Data Resources, page unavailable), and describes a multi-agent architecture (Learning-based, page unavailable). It does not establish that agentic-systems research has focused mainly on structured interactions between agents for isolated economic tasks; its examples also span social forums, software development, and mobile applications. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Buscemi et al., 2025 source
The Introduction (p. 2) describes structured interactions among three LLM agents in a game-theoretic regulatory setting, so the paper supports that part of the sentence. It does not establish that current agentic-systems research focuses mainly on individual agent performance or isolated economic tasks; its own task models a regulatory ecosystem. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Mao et al., 2025
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingown data§ ABSTRACT · p. 1
All models exhibit severe first-proposal bias.
“all models exhibit severe first-proposal bias”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ ABSTRACT · p. 1
First-proposal bias creates 10-30x advantages for response speed over quality.
“creating 10-30x advantages for response speed over quality”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ ABSTRACT · p. 1
Performance degrades sharply with scale.
“Performance degrades sharply with scale”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 3.2 Implementation Overview · p. 5
Platform extensibility is supported through the protocol discovery mechanism.
“The second objective, platform extensibility , is supported through the protocol discovery mechanism”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data§ These comparisons allow us to pinpoint whether performance bottlenecks arise from search quality, incomplete information, or the complexity of agent decision-making. · p. 10
Manual analysis of seven trials revealed more fundamental issues beyond prompt-model misalignment.
“While some degradation may stem from prompt-model misalignment, manual analysis of seven trials revealed more fundamental issues.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 6 Discussion · p. 14
Small changes in protocols lead to meaningful outcome differences.
“The Magentic Marketplace environment enables experimental exploration of these trade-offs, revealing that small changes in protocols lead to meaningful outcome differences.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 5.4 Agent Behavior Biases · p. 13
This represents a 10-30 fold advantage for businesses that respond first, dwarfing any other competitive factor we measured.
“This represents a 10-30 fold advantage for businesses that respond first, dwarfing any other competitive factor we measured.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 5.4 Agent Behavior Biases · p. 14
Near-zero selection rates for second and third proposals (often 0-7%) were observed.
“The near-zero selection rates for second and third proposals (often 0-7%) suggest agents are not genuinely comparing options but rather satisficing with the first acceptable offer.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ These comparisons allow us to pinpoint whether performance bottlenecks arise from search quality, incomplete information, or the complexity of agent decision-making. · p. 10
Manual evaluation of Qwen3-14b revealed significant performance limitations.
“Our manual evaluation of Qwen3-14b revealed significant performance limitations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 5.2 Consideration Set Size · p. 11
Giving agents more results to consider does not necessarily mean they will contact more businesses.
“Giving agents more results to consider does not necessarily mean they will contact more businesses (Figure 6a, Figure 6b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ 3.2 Implementation Overview · p. 5
Agent heterogeneity is supported because the protocol defines only the communication interface, not implementation requirements.
“Agent heterogeneity is supported because the protocol defines only the communication interface, not implementation requirements.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 5.2 Consideration Set Size · p. 11
For GPT-4o, consumer welfare declines by 4.3% when providing one hundred search results versus three search results in the initial consideration set (Mexican 100-300).
“For GPT-4o, which shows the least decline across search results, consumer welfare declines by 4.3% when providing one hundred search results versus three search results in the initial consideration set (Mexican 100-300).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ These comparisons allow us to pinpoint whether performance bottlenecks arise from search quality, incomplete information, or the complexity of agent decision-making. · p. 11
Experiments with consideration set size revealed a paradox of choice effect where increased options from search results reduced welfare.
“Experiments with consideration set size revealed a paradox of choice effect where surprisingly increased options (from search results) reduced welfare.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ These comparisons allow us to pinpoint whether performance bottlenecks arise from search quality, incomplete information, or the complexity of agent decision-making. · p. 10
Open-source models show an overall notable drop under lexical search.
“However, there is an overall notable drop under lexical search , suggesting difficulty in identifying optimal transactions when the consideration set is noisy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 5.2 Consideration Set Size · p. 11
For other models, consumer welfare declines more drastically as consideration set size increases (Sonnet-4 - 65.4%, GPT-5 - 44% on Mexican 100-300).
“For other models, consumer welfare declines more drastically as the consideration set size increases (Sonnet-4 - 65.4%, GPT-5 - 44% on Mexican 100-300), though we emphasize that in these experiments we use GPT-5 with minimal reasoning.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ These comparisons allow us to pinpoint whether performance bottlenecks arise from search quality, incomplete information, or the complexity of agent decision-making. · p. 10
Qwen3-14b exhibited role confusion where it critiqued its own wrong actions while simultaneously executing them.
“The model exhibited three primary failure modes including premature termination without completing payment, role confusion where it critiqued its own wrong actions while simultaneously executing them, and excessive purchasing without selection criteria, all pointing to fundamental challenges beyond prompt optimization of Qwen3-14b.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ These comparisons allow us to pinpoint whether performance bottlenecks arise from search quality, incomplete information, or the complexity of agent decision-making. · p. 10
Qwen3-14b performs poorly across both conditions.
“Qwen3-14b performs poorly across both conditions, mainly stemming from limited reasoning ability inherently.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 5.2 Consideration Set Size · p. 11
Only Gemini-2.5-Flash's outreach increases proportionally with the size of the consideration set.
“Only Gemini-2.5-Flash's outreach increases proportionally with the size of the consideration set, suggesting true exploratory capacity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 5.4 Agent Behavior Biases · p. 13
Frontier models (GPT-4.1, Sonnet-4.5, Gemini-2.5-Flash) showed near-uniform selection rates across all three positions in search results.
“Results in Figure 8 show that frontier models (GPT-4.1, Sonnet-4.5, Gemini-2.5-Flash) showed near-uniform selection rates across all three positions, suggesting they can effectively process search results in parallel rather than sequentially.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 5.2 Consideration Set Size · p. 11
There is a negative relationship between the consideration set size available to consumer agents and welfare outcomes.
“Our experiments revealed a negative relationship between the consideration set size available to consumer agents and welfare outcomes (Figure 5a, Figure 5b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Magentic Marketplace Environment · p. 2
Our results reveal systematic behavioral biases and vulnerabilities across models.
“Our results reveal systematic behavioral biases and vulnerabilities across models”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 5.4 Agent Behavior Biases · p. 13
Every model tested exhibited severe anchoring on the first proposal received, though with varying degrees.
“Every model tested exhibited severe anchoring on the first proposal received, though with varying degrees.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 5.3 Manipulation Resistance · p. 13
GPT-4o, GPT-OSS-20B, and Qwen3-4B-2507 showed increased payments to malicious actors under traditional psychological manipulation conditions.
“These models not only fell victim to prompt injection attacks which often redirect all payments to manipulative agents, but also showed increased payments to malicious actors under traditional psychological manipulation conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ These comparisons allow us to pinpoint whether performance bottlenecks arise from search quality, incomplete information, or the complexity of agent decision-making. · p. 10
Qwen3-4b-2507 performed close to GPT-4o in the Contractors dataset.
“Notice that GPT-OSS-20b outperforms GPT-4o in both lexical search and perfect search in Mexican dataset; and Qwen3-4b-2507 performed close to GPT-4o as well in Contractors dataset.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ These comparisons allow us to pinpoint whether performance bottlenecks arise from search quality, incomplete information, or the complexity of agent decision-making. · p. 10
Qwen3-14b exhibited premature termination without completing payment.
“The model exhibited three primary failure modes including premature termination without completing payment, role confusion where it critiqued its own wrong actions while simultaneously executing them, and excessive purchasing without selection criteria, all pointing to fundamental challenges beyond prompt optimization of Qwen3-14b.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ These comparisons allow us to pinpoint whether performance bottlenecks arise from search quality, incomplete information, or the complexity of agent decision-making. · p. 9
Under Agentic: Lexical search, proprietary models such as Sonnet-4, Sonnet4.5, GPT-5, GPT-4.1, GPT-4o, and Gemini-2.5-Flash outperform two of the three baseline conditions: random selection among businesses with matching menu items, and cheapest selection based on price without amenity information.
“Even under these imperfect search conditions, proprietary models such as Sonnet-4, Sonnet4.5, GPT-5, GPT-4.1, GPT-4o, and Gemini-2.5-Flash outperform two of the three baseline conditions: random selection among businesses with matching menu items, and cheapest selection based on price without amenity information.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 5.2 Consideration Set Size · p. 11
The majority of models exhibit limited exploration, contacting only a small fraction of available businesses regardless of how many options were presented.
“The majority of models exhibit limited exploration, contacting only a small fraction of available businesses regardless of how many options were presented.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ These comparisons allow us to pinpoint whether performance bottlenecks arise from search quality, incomplete information, or the complexity of agent decision-making. · p. 11
Consideration set size experiments revealed that the majority of models contact only a small subset of businesses, even when provided with more options.
“Consideration set size experiments (Section 5.2) also revealed that the majority of models contact only a small subset of businesses, even when provided with more options.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ These comparisons allow us to pinpoint whether performance bottlenecks arise from search quality, incomplete information, or the complexity of agent decision-making. · p. 10
Qwen3-14b exhibited excessive purchasing without selection criteria.
“The model exhibited three primary failure modes including premature termination without completing payment, role confusion where it critiqued its own wrong actions while simultaneously executing them, and excessive purchasing without selection criteria, all pointing to fundamental challenges beyond prompt optimization of Qwen3-14b.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ These comparisons allow us to pinpoint whether performance bottlenecks arise from search quality, incomplete information, or the complexity of agent decision-making. · p. 11
Gemini-2.5-Flash consistently sent messages to all businesses provided for consideration.
“Gemini-2.5-Flash consistently sent messages to all businesses provided for consideration.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given§ Magentic Marketplace Environment · p. 2
Magentic Marketplace is a simulated multiagentic marketplace environment for controlled experimentation in agentic markets.
“we introduce Magentic Marketplace , a simulated m ultiagentic marketplace environment for controlled experimentation in agentic markets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 5.4 Agent Behavior Biases · p. 13
Even the 'best performing' model in terms of proposal diversity (GPT-4.1 in the contractor scenario) still selected first proposals at 60% compared to 13.3% for third proposals, a 4.5x advantage.
“Even the 'best performing' model in terms of proposal diversity (GPT-4.1 in the contractor scenario) still selected first proposals at 60% compared to 13.3% for third proposals, a 4.5x advantage.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 5.3 Manipulation Resistance · p. 13
GPT-4o, GPT-OSS-20B, and Qwen3-4B-2507 demonstrated significant vulnerability across multiple attack vectors.
“In stark contrast, GPT-4o, GPT-OSS-20B, and Qwen3-4B-2507 demonstrated significant vulnerability across multiple attack vectors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 5.3 Manipulation Resistance · p. 12
Frontier models demonstrate robust manipulation resistance.
“Frontier models demonstrate robust manipulation resistance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 5.3 Manipulation Resistance · p. 12
Sonnet-4.5 exhibited the strongest resistance, showing virtually no susceptibility to any manipulation strategy tested.
“Sonnet-4.5 exhibited the strongest resistance, showing virtually no susceptibility to any manipulation strategy tested.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 5.3 Manipulation Resistance · p. 12
Results in Figure 7 reveal a clear divide in manipulation resistance across model sizes and capabilities.
“Results in Figure 7 reveal a clear divide in manipulation resistance across model sizes and capabilities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ These comparisons allow us to pinpoint whether performance bottlenecks arise from search quality, incomplete information, or the complexity of agent decision-making. · p. 9
Figure 4 reveals a clear hierarchy in performance under different conditions and models.
“Figure 4 reveals a clear hierarchy in performance under different conditions and models.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 5.2 Consideration Set Size · p. 11
Increased exploration does not correlate with improved performance.
“However, increased exploration does not correlate with improved performance either.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ 6 Discussion · p. 14
Even when individual components appear to work well in isolation, emergent outcomes and dynamic interactions can lead to unintended consequences, vulnerabilities, and inefficiencies that are apparent only at scale.
“Even when individual components appear to work well in isolation, emergent outcomes and dynamic interactions can lead to unintended consequences, vulnerabilities, and inefficiencies that are apparent only at scale.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ These comparisons allow us to pinpoint whether performance bottlenecks arise from search quality, incomplete information, or the complexity of agent decision-making. · p. 10
Two-sided agentic markets can achieve reasonable welfare outcomes by reducing information asymmetries through agent-mediated communication.
“These findings collectively demonstrate that two-sided agentic markets can achieve reasonable welfare outcomes by reducing information asymmetries through agent-mediated communication.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The synthetic restaurant and contractor marketplace scenarios adequately represent real-world two-sided markets for drawing conclusions about agentic markets.
- Rests on an assumption: The LLM agents' behavior in the simulated marketplace is representative of autonomous agents in real two-sided markets.
- Interpretationown data§ These comparisons allow us to pinpoint whether performance bottlenecks arise from search quality, incomplete information, or the complexity of agent decision-making. · p. 10
These failure modes point to fundamental challenges beyond prompt optimization of Qwen3-14b.
“The model exhibited three primary failure modes including premature termination without completing payment, role confusion where it critiqued its own wrong actions while simultaneously executing them, and excessive purchasing without selection criteria, all pointing to fundamental challenges beyond prompt optimization of Qwen3-14b.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ 5.2 Consideration Set Size · p. 11
Gemini-2.5-Flash's proportional outreach suggests true exploratory capacity.
“Only Gemini-2.5-Flash's outreach increases proportionally with the size of the consideration set, suggesting true exploratory capacity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ 5.4 Agent Behavior Biases · p. 13
Proposal bias emerged as a dominant behavioral pattern that fundamentally distorts marketplace dynamics.
“Unlike the relatively modest position effects observed in search results, proposal bias emerged as a dominant behavioral pattern that fundamentally distorts marketplace dynamics.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 5.4 Agent Behavior Biases · p. 14
In a marketplace where agents exhibit such extreme proposal bias, competitive dynamics can shift entirely from product quality or pricing to response latency.
“In a marketplace where agents exhibit such extreme proposal bias, competitive dynamics can shift entirely from product quality or pricing to response latency.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ 5.4 Agent Behavior Biases · p. 14
Agents are not genuinely comparing options but rather satisficing with the first acceptable offer.
“The near-zero selection rates for second and third proposals (often 0-7%) suggest agents are not genuinely comparing options but rather satisficing with the first acceptable offer.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning§ 4.1 Data Generation · p. 7
The authors use fully synthetic data to ensure experimental control, reproducibility, and safe exploration of agent behaviors.
“In this work, we use fully synthetic data to ensure experimental control, reproducibility, and safe exploration of agent behaviors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ 5.2 Consideration Set Size · p. 11
These results illustrate a strikingly consistent paradox of choice whereby presenting more options to an assistant agent ultimately leads to lower-quality selections.
“These results illustrate a strikingly consistent paradox of choice whereby presenting more options to an assistant agent ultimately leads to lower-quality selections.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The synthetic restaurant and contractor marketplace scenarios adequately represent real-world two-sided markets for drawing conclusions about agentic markets.
- Rests on an assumption: The LLM agents' behavior in the simulated marketplace is representative of autonomous agents in real two-sided markets.
- Study design and conductnone given§ 6 Discussion · p. 15
Our experimental study focused on two-sided agentic markets populated entirely by AI agents.
“Our experimental study focused on two-sided agentic markets populated entirely by AI agents.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ These comparisons allow us to pinpoint whether performance bottlenecks arise from search quality, incomplete information, or the complexity of agent decision-making. · p. 10
The drop under lexical search suggests difficulty in identifying optimal transactions when the consideration set is noisy.
“However, there is an overall notable drop under lexical search , suggesting difficulty in identifying optimal transactions when the consideration set is noisy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 5.4 Agent Behavior Biases · p. 14
This bias can create market distortions that undermine quality and price competition.
“This bias can create market distortions that undermine quality and price competition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ 5.4 Agent Behavior Biases · p. 13
Frontier models can effectively process search results in parallel rather than sequentially.
“Results in Figure 8 show that frontier models (GPT-4.1, Sonnet-4.5, Gemini-2.5-Flash) showed near-uniform selection rates across all three positions, suggesting they can effectively process search results in parallel rather than sequentially.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ These comparisons allow us to pinpoint whether performance bottlenecks arise from search quality, incomplete information, or the complexity of agent decision-making. · p. 10
When autonomous agents are equipped with capabilities for discovery, communication, and transaction execution empowered by sufficiently advanced language models, they can effectively mediate between consumers and service providers.
“Our results, with baseline ReACT-style agents, indicate that when autonomous agents are equipped with capabilities for discovery, communication, and transaction execution empowered by sufficiently advanced language models, they can effectively mediate between consumers and service providers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The synthetic restaurant and contractor marketplace scenarios adequately represent real-world two-sided markets for drawing conclusions about agentic markets.
- Rests on an assumption: The LLM agents' behavior in the simulated marketplace is representative of autonomous agents in real two-sided markets.
- Interpretationown data§ These comparisons allow us to pinpoint whether performance bottlenecks arise from search quality, incomplete information, or the complexity of agent decision-making. · p. 9
Coordinated agentic interactions can approximate optimal welfare outcomes when discovery is accurate and communication is effective.
“These results demonstrate the potential of coordinated agentic interactions to approximate optimal welfare outcomes when discovery is accurate and communication is effective.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The LLM agents' behavior in the simulated marketplace is representative of autonomous agents in real two-sided markets.
- Interpretationown data§ These comparisons allow us to pinpoint whether performance bottlenecks arise from search quality, incomplete information, or the complexity of agent decision-making. · p. 9
Agents can effectively communicate and reason to navigate noise in the discovery layer and still make high-quality decisions.
“These results suggest that agents can effectively communicate and reason to navigate noise in the discovery layer and still make high-quality decisions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The LLM agents' behavior in the simulated marketplace is representative of autonomous agents in real two-sided markets.
- Interpretationown data§ These comparisons allow us to pinpoint whether performance bottlenecks arise from search quality, incomplete information, or the complexity of agent decision-making. · p. 10
Qwen3-14b's poor performance mainly stems from limited reasoning ability inherently.
“Qwen3-14b performs poorly across both conditions, mainly stemming from limited reasoning ability inherently.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- May combine two claims. 26
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 21
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ ABSTRACT · p. 1Frontier models can approach optimal welfare, but only under ideal search conditions.
“Our experiments show that frontier models can approach optimal welfare-but only under ideal search conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 5.3 Manipulation Resistance · p. 13GPT-OSS-20B and Qwen3-4B-2507 proved particularly vulnerable, with authority appeals and social proof tactics successfully increasing payments to manipulated businesses.
“GPT-OSS-20B and Qwen3-4B-2507 proved particularly vulnerable, with authority appeals and social proof tactics successfully increasing payments to manipulated businesses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 5.3 Manipulation Resistance · p. 12GPT-4.1, Sonnet-4.5, and Gemini-2.5-Flash maintained relatively stable performance across most manipulation conditions, with mean payments to manipulated businesses remaining low, typically under 1.0 out of 3.0 possible.
“GPT-4.1, Sonnet-4.5, and Gemini-2.5-Flash maintained relatively stable performance across most manipulation conditions , with mean payments to manipulated businesses remaining low, typically under 1.0 out of 3.0 possible.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 3.2 Implementation Overview · p. 5The architecture achieves both design objectives effectively.
“This architecture achieves both design objectives effectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Findingnone given§ Magentic Marketplace Environment · p. 2The environment supports the full transaction lifecycle: from search and matching to negotiation and transaction.
“The environment supports the full transaction lifecycle: from search and matching to negotiation and transaction”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 5.3 Manipulation Resistance · p. 12GPT-4.1 and Gemini-2.5-Flash showed similar resilience, though Gemini-2.5-Flash displayed some vulnerability to strong prompt injection attacks in the Mexican restaurant scenario with mean payment dropping to 1.6.
“GPT-4.1 and Gemini-2.5-Flash showed similar resilience, though Gemini-2.5-Flash displayed some vulnerability to strong prompt injection attacks in the Mexican restaurant scenario with mean payment dropping to 1.6.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ Magentic Marketplace Environment · p. 2The environment is extensible: it supports additional synthetic domains and public/open datasets.
“But the environment is extensible: it supports additional synthetic domains and public/open datasets”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 5.3 Manipulation Resistance · p. 13GPT-4o, GPT-OSS-20B, and Qwen3-4B-2507 fell victim to prompt injection attacks which often redirect all payments to manipulative agents.
“These models not only fell victim to prompt injection attacks which often redirect all payments to manipulative agents, but also showed increased payments to malicious actors under traditional psychological manipulation conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 6 Discussion · p. 15Our experiments reveal significant behavioral variations across agent models, including differential abilities to process noisy search results and varying susceptibility to manipulation tactics, with performance gaps widening as market complexity increases.
“Our experiments reveal significant behavioral variations across agent models, including differential abilities to process noisy search results and varying susceptibility to manipulation tactics, with performance gaps widening as market complexity increases.”
- Also stated in: § 7 Conclusion · p. 16 · plain
“Our experiments reveal significant behavioral variations across agent models, including differential abilities to process noisy search results and varying susceptibility to manipulation tactics, with performance gaps widening as market complexity increases.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § 7 Conclusion · p. 16 · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 5.4 Agent Behavior Biases · p. 13Qwen3-4B exhibited severe position bias, selecting the third-listed business 57.1% of the time in Mexican restaurant searches and 66.7% in contractor searches-more than double the expected rate under random selection.
“However, Qwen3-4B exhibited severe position bias, selecting the third-listed business 57.1% of the time in Mexican restaurant searches and 66.7% in contractor searches-more than double the expected rate under random selection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Findingreasoning§ 3.1 Environment Design Goals · p. 4Agents discover matches through conversational exchanges.
“agents discover matches through conversational exchanges”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ These comparisons allow us to pinpoint whether performance bottlenecks arise from search quality, incomplete information, or the complexity of agent decision-making. · p. 10Both GPT-OSS-20b and Qwen3-4b-2507 perform competitively under perfect search, approaching proprietary model performance.
“Both GPT-OSS-20b and Qwen3-4b-2507 perform competitively under perfect search, approaching proprietary model performance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone given§ 3.2 Implementation Overview · p. 6These actions create asymmetric capabilities reflecting current marketplace dynamics.
“These actions create asymmetric capabilities reflecting current marketplace dynamics.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ 3.1 Environment Design Goals · p. 4Assistant Agents don't initially know which businesses can fulfill requests or at what price, while Service Agents don't know customers' budgets or preferences.
“Assistant Agents don't initially know which businesses can fulfill requests or at what price, while Service Agents don't know customers' budgets or preferences”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 5.4 Agent Behavior Biases · p. 13GPT4o and Sonnet-4.5 showed the most extreme behavior in certain conditions, achieving 100% first-proposal selection rates.
“GPT4o and Sonnet-4.5 showed the most extreme behavior in certain conditions, achieving 100% first-proposal selection rates-meaning these agents never waited to compare alternatives once receiving an initial offer.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ These comparisons allow us to pinpoint whether performance bottlenecks arise from search quality, incomplete information, or the complexity of agent decision-making. · p. 10GPT-OSS-20b outperforms GPT-4o in both lexical search and perfect search in the Mexican dataset.
“Notice that GPT-OSS-20b outperforms GPT-4o in both lexical search and perfect search in Mexican dataset; and Qwen3-4b-2507 performed close to GPT-4o as well in Contractors dataset.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 5.4 Agent Behavior Biases · p. 13The experiment results reveal extreme first-mover advantages across all models, with first proposals achieving selection rates between 60-100% compared to near-zero selection for third proposals.
“The experiment results reveal extreme first-mover advantages across all models, with first proposals achieving selection rates between 60-100% compared to near-zero selection for third proposals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ These comparisons allow us to pinpoint whether performance bottlenecks arise from search quality, incomplete information, or the complexity of agent decision-making. · p. 9Under Agentic: Perfect search, GPT-4.1 and Gemini-2.5-Flash come very close to the optimal outcome and even surpass the baseline of randomly selecting among businesses that match all menu items and amenities.
“In this setting, GPT-4.1 and Gemini-2.5.-Flash come very close to the optimal outcome (the dashed line in Figure 4) and even surpass the baseline of randomly selecting among businesses that match all menu items and amenities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ 7 Conclusion · p. 16We developed Magentic Marketplace an open-source, extensible platform for studying agentic economies through controlled experimentation, addressing the critical need for robust testing before real-world deployment.
“We developed Magentic Marketplace an open-source, extensible platform for studying agentic economies through controlled experimentation, addressing the critical need for robust testing before real-world deployment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 5.4 Agent Behavior Biases · p. 14This behavior pattern potentially lead to suboptimal matches between consumers and service providers while creating an arms race for response speed at the expense of other valuable market attributes.
“This behavior pattern potentially lead to suboptimal matches between consumers and service providers while creating an arms race for response speed at the expense of other valuable market attributes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationreasoning§ 6 Discussion · p. 15These results suggest benefits to human-in-the-loop designs where agents assist rather than replace human decision-making, particularly for high-stakes transactions.
“These results suggest benefits to human-in-the-loop designs where agents assist rather than replace human decision-making, particularly for high-stakes transactions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone given§ 4.2 Evaluation · p. 8All experiments were conducted with 5 independent runs, with mean and standard deviation reported.
“All experiments were conducted with 5 independent runs, with mean and standard deviation reported.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone given§ 6 Discussion · p. 14Our experiments focused on static markets in which neither the agents nor the environment were required to learn or adapt to the history of requests and outcomes.
“We note that our experiments focused on static markets in which neither the agents nor the environment were required to learn or adapt to the history of requests and outcomes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisereasoning§ Magentic Marketplace Environment · p. 2Agent-to-agent interaction can overcome information asymmetry by inexpensively engaging in conversation to explore the full range of possible options, generating value for both consumers and businesses.
“Agent-to-agent interaction, however, can overcome such an asymmetry by inexpensively engaging in conversation to explore the full range of possible options, generating value for both consumers and businesses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Humans cannot discover bespoke configurations without costly communication.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 6 Discussion · p. 15The utility model used to evaluate each agent's performance is fully flexible, so agents of different types can be associated with simulated users with different preferences, goals, and constraints.
“Crucially, the utility model used to evaluate each agent's performance is fully flexible, so agents of different types can be associated with simulated users with different preferences, goals, and constraints.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ 5.4 Agent Behavior Biases · p. 13The consistency of this pattern across both proprietary frontier models and open-source alternatives indicates this is not merely a training artifact but potentially a deeper limitation in how current language models handle temporal decision sequences.
“The consistency of this pattern across both proprietary frontier models and open-source alternatives indicates this is not merely a training artifact but potentially a deeper limitation in how current language models handle temporal decision sequences.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisereasoning§ 6 Discussion · p. 15Magentic Marketplace can be extended to settings where human users can choose whether to participate directly in the market or delegate to an agentic proxy.
“But Magentic Marketplace can be extended to settings where human users can choose whether to participate directly in the market or delegate to an agentic proxy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisereasoning§ 6 Discussion · p. 15The Magentic Marketplace is also extensible beyond two-sided agentic markets that match consumers with businesses.
“The Magentic Marketplace is also extensible beyond two-sided agentic markets that match consumers with businesses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisereasoning§ 6 Discussion · p. 15This flexibility makes it possible to explore many different market contexts using the Magentic Marketplace environment and infrastructure.
“This flexibility makes it possible to explore many different market contexts using the Magentic Marketplace environment and infrastructure.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisereasoning§ 6 Discussion · p. 15The Magentic Marketplace architecture supports such collaborative patterns, allowing humans to retain control of critical actions while gradually increasing agent autonomy as trustworthiness improves.
“The Magentic Marketplace architecture supports such collaborative patterns, allowing humans to retain control of critical actions while gradually increasing agent autonomy as trustworthiness improves.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone given§ Menu features: · p. 8The pipeline is fully configurable for reproducibility, and can be extended to other domains or real-world datasets by mapping to the same schema.
“The pipeline is fully configurable for reproducibility, and can be extended to other domains ( e.g. , travel, retail) or real-world datasets by mapping to the same schema.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ 6 Discussion · p. 15Our environment distinguishes between human users and their AI agents, creating principal-agent relationships where welfare loss stems from agents' mistakes rather than misaligned incentives.
“Our environment distinguishes between human users and their AI agents, creating principal-agent relationships where welfare loss stems from agents' mistakes rather than misaligned incentives.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 6 Discussion · p. 15The same protocol - search, negotiate, pay - would work regardless of whether the 'agent' is AI or a human user.
“The same protocol - search, negotiate, pay - would work regardless of whether the 'agent' is AI or a human user.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisereasoning§ 6 Discussion · p. 15This also makes it possible to simulate a two-sided market where AI agents appear only on one side of the market, such as human consumers navigating conversations and transactions with LLM-powered service agents.
“This also makes it possible to simulate a two-sided market where AI agents appear only on one side of the market, such as human consumers navigating conversations and transactions with LLM-powered service agents.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ Magentic Marketplace Environment · p. 2Two-sided agentic markets promise to generate added value by reducing communication costs and information asymmetries.
“Two-sided agentic markets promise to generate added value by reducing communication costs and information asymmetries”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rothschild et al., 2025 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 6 Discussion · p. 14When agents show first-proposal bias, search ordering becomes critical; when vulnerable to manipulation, trust systems become essential.
“When agents show first-proposal bias, search ordering becomes critical; when vulnerable to manipulation, trust systems become essential.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 5.4 Agent Behavior Biases · p. 14Businesses gain more from investing in faster response systems than improving their offerings, as even superior late-arriving proposals are effectively excluded from consideration.
“Businesses gain more from investing in faster response systems than improving their offerings, as even superior late-arriving proposals are effectively excluded from consideration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ 5.4 Agent Behavior Biases · p. 13Proposal bias represents a universal and severe market distortion.
“Proposal bias represents a universal and severe market distortion.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Interpretationown data§ 5.4 Agent Behavior Biases · p. 13GPT4o and Sonnet-4.5 never waited to compare alternatives once receiving an initial offer.
“GPT4o and Sonnet-4.5 showed the most extreme behavior in certain conditions, achieving 100% first-proposal selection rates-meaning these agents never waited to compare alternatives once receiving an initial offer.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ 3.1 Environment Design Goals · p. 4When multiple businesses offer similar services, competition on price and quality benefits consumers, and vice-versa.
“when multiple businesses offer similar services, competition on price and quality benefits consumers, and vice-versa”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Real-world markets require agents to handle diverse economic activities and coordinate within large, dynamic ecosystems where multiple agents with opaque behaviors may engage in open-ended dialogues.
“Real-world markets are fundamentally different: they require agents to handle diverse economic activities and coordinate within large, dynamic ecosystems where multiple agents with opaque behaviors may engage in open-ended dialogues.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Humans cannot discover bespoke configurations without costly communication.
“Humans cannot discover bespoke configurations without costly communication ( e.g. , phone calls).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Agents based on frontier models could improve market efficiency.
“Agents based on frontier models could improve market efficiency”
The paper relies on this without support.
The fact that frontier models are trained on human digital footprints raises concerns about inherited biases and vulnerabilities.
“the fact that they are trained on human digital footprints raises concerns about inherited biases and vulnerabilities”
The paper relies on this without support.
Such models introduce new potential vulnerabilities, such as susceptibility to prompt injection attacks and other forms of manipulation.
“such models introduce new potential vulnerabilities-such as susceptibility to prompt injection attacks and other forms of manipulation”
The paper relies on this without support.
The synthetic restaurant and contractor marketplace scenarios adequately represent real-world two-sided markets for drawing conclusions about agentic markets.
“In this work, we use fully synthetic data to ensure experimental control, reproducibility, and safe exploration of agent behaviors.”
“To ground our experiments, we focus two domains: restaurants and contractors - though the schema is easily adapted to other retail scenarios.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The LLM agents' behavior in the simulated marketplace is representative of autonomous agents in real two-sided markets.
“We evaluate both proprietary and open-source models to demonstrate early findings under Magentic Marketplace .”
“Our results, with baseline ReACT-style agents, indicate that when autonomous agents are equipped with capabilities for discovery, communication, and transaction execution empowered by sufficiently advanced language models, they can effectively mediate between consumers and service providers.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The Magentic Marketplace simulation environment accurately reflects the dynamics of real-world agentic markets.
“As LLM agents increasingly mediate economic transactions, end-to-end simulation environments like Magentic Marketplace become essential tools for understanding emergent behaviors and designing safe, efficient agentic marketplaces.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Claimed 10-30-fold first-proposal advantage conflicts with a reported 4.5-fold case
MinorThe paper describes the first-proposal advantage as 10-30-fold across models, but reports a 4.5-fold advantage for GPT-4.1 in the contractor scenario. That example falls outside the stated range.
“This represents a 10-30 fold advantage for businesses that respond first, dwarfing any other competitive factor we measured.”
“Even the 'best performing' model in terms of proposal diversity (GPT-4.1 in the contractor scenario) still selected first proposals at 60% compared to 13.3% for third proposals, a 4.5x advantage.”
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Seth Karten, Wenzhe Li, Zihan Ding, Samuel Kleiner, Yu Bai, and Chi Jin. Llm economist: Large population models and mechanism design in multi-agent generative simulacra, 2025a. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2507. 15815 .
- Annie Liang. Artificial intelligence clones. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation , pp. 387-388, 2025.
- Shaoguang Mao, Yuzhe Cai, Yan Xia, Wenshan Wu, Xun Wang, Fengyi Wang, Qiang Guan, Tao Ge, and Furu Wei. Alympics: Llm agents meet game theory. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Computational Linguistics , pp. 2845-2866, 2025.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dhanorkar, S., Passi, S., & Vorvoreanu, M. (2026) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3805689.3812402 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“2 Literature Review”
Auditing Preferences for Brands and Cultures in LLMsPreprint
Rienecker, J., Mpofu, K., Goel, N., et al. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.18300 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“In commercial settings, even when autonomous agents evaluate available options without explicit preferences, bias in AI-driven information discovery, including AI recommendations and rankings, may systematically skew automated purchasing decisions (Bansal et al., 2025).”
Markets, Not Planners: Decentralized Orchestration of LLM Agents with Private Information
Liu, X., Li, H.-Y., Li, S., et al. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.23867 · Cited by 3
Emergent Misaligned Communication in Long-Horizon Multi-Agent LLM Commerce
Li, Z., Petersson, L., Acquisti, A., et al. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.14825 · Cited by 3
“Across these streams, the closest concurrent precedent is Magentic Marketplace [Bansal et al., 2025], which studies LLM-to-LLM interaction in a two-sided agentic marketplace and scores transaction-level outcomes (welfare, manipulation, search efficiency, bias) across the search-to-transaction…”
Agentic Commerce World: An Auditable and Verifiable Environment for Vibe Commerce
Fan, S.-C., Yang, M.-D., Wang, D., et al. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.02441 · Cited by 3
“…(2025); Barres et al. (2026); Trivedi et al. (2024); Xie et al. (2024), while shopping and market benchmarks test product choice or strategic behavior Yao et al. (2022); Wang et al. (2026); Savadikar et al. (2026); Allouah et al. (2026); Fan et al. (2026b); Liu et al. (2026); Bansal et al. (2025).”
What Makes a Sale? Simulating End-to-End Seller--Buyer Retail Dynamics with LLM Agents
Choi, J., Hwang, J., Sun, G., et al. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.04468 · Cited by 3
“…level, with limited consideration of how seller–buyer interactions connect across the full process or whether their aggregate outcomes reflect real-world economic regularities (Yao et al., 2025; Wang et al., 2025b; Zhu et al., 2025; Wang et al., 2025c; Bansal et al., 2025; Zhou et al., 2026).”
When Guardrails Look Effective: Construct Validity Failures in LLM Agent Commerce Evaluation
Zhu, P.-K., & Chang, S.-D. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.01519 · Cited by 2
“Recent environments make it possible to study such systems before deployment [1, 14].”
Paying for Honesty Without Knowing the Truth: Reputation-Penalty Design for LLM Marketplace Agents
Yang, M.-D., Fan, S.-C., Yu, K., et al. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.28330 · Cited by 2
Liu, D. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.02814 · Cited by 2
“(5) We provide an artifact-gate protocol for prompt-leakage scans, metric recomputation, and anonymous release.”
CAVEAT: Towards Robust Computer-Use Agents in Incentive-Misaligned Environments
Li, Y., Epperson, W., Deng, W., et al. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.27273 · Cited by 1
Self-citationLiu, D. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.05363 · Cited by 1
“We use SovScore as a reporting index rather than a universal user-utility function: all component metrics are reported separately, paired comparisons are computed on the same scenario-model units, and the appendix checks that conclusions are stable under task-heavy, privacy-heavy, and burden-heavy…”
When Agents Shop for You: Role Coherence in AI-Mediated Markets
Alavi, S., & Nozari, S. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.26220 · Cited by 1
“Frameworks for agent-mediated payments, protocols for agent-to-agent communication, and consumer-facing shopping agents from the major model providers have all recently emerged (Staufer et al., 2026; Bansal et al., 2025).”
IEMAS: An Incentive-Efficiency Routing Framework for Open Agentic Web Ecosystems
Liu, H., Guo, C., Li, Y., et al. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.17302 · Cited by 1
“Recent works on AI marketplaces (Bansal et al., 2025; Yang et al., 2025d) and truthful capability revelation (Liu et al., 2025) address strategic risks but often decouple the mechanism from sys-tem performance, treating compute as a generic commodity.”
Pricing Information in Search with Nonobligatory Inspection
Zhang, S., Liu, B.-Y., & Wang, Z.-H. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.34369
“By gathering and comparing information on the user’s behalf, agents can evaluate many more alternatives without requiring users to browse each one [6, 30, 33, 34, 36].”
Toolflation: Seller Agents Distort Tool Markets Through Spontaneous Generative Engine Optimization
Tang, Z.-W., Bai, D., Liu, J.-T., et al. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.28454
“Shopping agents, likewise, choose among products on behalf of their users (Allouah et al., 2025; Bansal et al., 2025).”
Yousuf, M., & Habib, A. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.20144
“It adapted Magentic Marketplace, an open environment in which some agents represent buyers and others sellers [5].”
Get In, Decide, Prove: A Merchant-Side Readiness Benchmark for Agentic Commerce
de Valois-Franklin, A., Bogdan, A., Ibrahim, A., et al. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.17378
“…design: ShoppingBench [9] and WebMall [11] vary the agent against a fixed catalog, DeepShop [10] and ShoppingComp [12] test it on live shops and open-world products, and market simulations such as ACES [13] and Magentic Marketplace [29] study what agents choose and how markets of agents behave.”
Do Small Language Models Learn to Negotiate? A Controlled Scaling Study of RL-Trained Sellers
Tabacof, P., & Joglekar, S. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.06204
“Agreements between prompted LLM negotiators track the opening anchor [11], and LLM buyers favour the first proposal they receive [5].”
Can We Trust Autonomous Agents? A Formal Framework for Verifiable Agent Economies
Karim, M. M., & Qu, Q. (2026) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi18100532
“Negotiation benchmarks [2], agent-market environments [29], platform theory [30], and controlled studies [31–36] provide complementary accounts of agents as market participants and of the markets in which they interact.”
TourMart: A Parametric Audit Instrument for Commission Steering in LLM Travel Agents
Liu, Y. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.10440
“…steering in adjacent commercial settings: Salvi et al. [14], in two preregistered ebook-recommendation experiments ( N =2 , 012 ), demonstrate substantial sponsored-product preference under binary disclosure manipulation; Bansal et al. [15] release an open-source agentic-market simulator.”
- Authors
- Bansal, G., Hua, W., Huang, Z., Fourney, A., Swearngin, A., Epperson, W., Payne, T., Hofman, J. M., Lucier, B., Singh, C., Mobius, M., Nambi, A., Yadav, A., Gao, K., Rothschild, D. M., Slivkins, A., Goldstein, D. G., Mozannar, H., Immorlica, N., Murad, M., Vogel, M., Kambhampati, S., Horvitz, E., & Amershi, S.
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2025
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2510.25779
- OpenAlex
- W7103174989
- Semantic Scholar
- 4bf7057098925c7f36ce0d78c5024ca15e0667b1
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Keywords
- LLM agents, two-sided markets, consumer agents, service agents, search mechanisms, behavioral biases, welfare, open-source simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-29.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-29.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review