The DOI matches its DataCite record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Embodied Agents Meet Personalization: Investigating Challenges and Solutions Through the Lens of Memory Utilization
Abstract
LLM-powered embodied agents have shown success on conventional object-rearrangement tasks, but providing personalized assistance that leverages user-specific knowledge from past interactions presents new challenges. We investigate these challenges through the lens of agents' memory utilization along two critical dimensions: object semantics (identifying objects based on personal meaning) and user patterns (recalling sequences from behavioral routines). To assess these capabilities, we construct MEMENTO, an end-to-end two-stage evaluation framework comprising single-memory and joint-memory tasks. Our experiments reveal that current agents can recall simple object semantics but struggle to apply sequential user patterns to planning. Through in-depth analysis, we identify two critical bottlenecks: information overload and coordination failures when handling multiple memories. Based on these findings, we explore memory architectural approaches to address these challenges. Given our observation that episodic memory provides both personalized knowledge and in-context learning benefits, we design a hierarchical knowledge graph-based user-profile memory module that separately manages personalized knowledge, achieving substantial improvements on both single and joint-memory tasks. Project website: https://connoriginal.github.io/MEMENTO
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Systems such as M3-Agent (Long et al., 2025) and MEMENTO (Kwon et al., 2025) persist data on household members, object locations, and routines, reusing this information to minimize redundant exploration and repeated instructions.”
From Memory in the Age of AI Agents (2025) · cites this paper as Kwon et al., 2025
In the citing paper
“Systems such as M3-Agent (Long et al., 2025) and MEMENTO (Kwon et al., 2025) persist data on household members, object locations, and routines, reusing this information to minimize redundant exploration and repeated instructions.”
From Memory in the Age of AI Agents (2025) · cites this paper as Kwon et al., 2025
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ProgPrompt: Generating Situated Robot Task Plans using Large Language Models
Singh, I., Blukis, V., Mousavian, A., Goyal, A., Xu, D., Tremblay, J., Fox, D., Thomason, J., & Garg, A. (2023) · 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra48891.2023.10161317 · Cited by 613
MemGPT: Towards LLMs as Operating Systems
Packer, C., Wooders, S., Lin, K., Fang, V., Patil, S. G., Stoica, I., & Gonzalez, J. E. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.08560 · Cited by 64
Building Cooperative Embodied Agents Modularly with Large Language Models
Zhang, H., Du, W., Shan, J., Zhou, Q., Du, Y., Tenenbaum, J. B., Shu, T., & Gan, C. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.02485 · Cited by 52
A-Mem: Agentic Memory for LLM Agents
Xu, W., Liang, Z., Mei, K., Gao, H., Tan, J., & Zhang, Y. (2025) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 38 · doi:10.52202/085713-0593 · Cited by 51
Yang, R., Chen, H., Zhang, J., Zhao, M., Qian, C., Wang, K., Wang, Q., Koripella, T. V., Movahedi, M., Li, M., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.09560 · Cited by 29
Cited by
Memory in the Age of AI Agents
Hu, Y., Liu, S., Yue, Y., Zhang, G., Liu, B., Zhu, F., Lin, J., Guo, H., Dou, S., Xi, Z., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.13564 · Cited by 389
A Survey of Context Engineering for Large Language Models
Mei, L., Yao, J., Ge, Y., Wang, Y., Bi, B., Cai, Y., Liu, J., Li, M., Li, Z.-Z., Zhang, D., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.13334 · Cited by 281
Anatomy of Agentic Memory: Taxonomy and Empirical Analysis of Evaluation and System Limitations
Jiang, D., Li, Y., Wei, S., Yang, J., Kishore, A., Zhao, A., Kang, D., Hu, X., Chen, F., Li, Q., et al. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.19320
“…Memory: Personalized memory maintains persistent user profiles that integrate short-and long-term preferences to support adaptive, identity-consistent behavior across sessions (Zhong et al., 2024; Li et al., 2025a; Kwon et al., 2025; Liu et al., 2025a; Mao et al., 2026; Su et al., 2026).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Kwon, T., Choi, D., Kim, H., Kim, S., Moon, S., Kwak, B.-W., Huang, K.-H., & Yeo, J.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2025
- arXiv
- 2505.16348
- References
- 5
- Type
- Preprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Embodied Agents Meet Personalization: Investigating Challenges and Solutions Through the Lens of Memory Utilization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.2505.16348
- The paper
- Kwon, T., Choi, D., Kim, H., Kim, S., Moon, S., Kwak, B.-W., Huang, K.-H., & Yeo, J. (2025). Embodied Agents Meet Personalization: Investigating Challenges and Solutions Through the Lens of Memory Utilization. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2505.16348
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
