The DOI matches its DataCite record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Get Experience from Practice: LLM Agents with Record & Replay
Abstract
AI agents, empowered by Large Language Models (LLMs) and communication protocols such as MCP and A2A, have rapidly evolved from simple chatbots to autonomous entities capable of executing complex, multi-step tasks, demonstrating great potential. However, the LLMs' inherent uncertainty and heavy computational resource requirements pose four significant challenges to the development of safe and efficient agents: reliability, privacy, cost and performance. Existing approaches, like model alignment, workflow constraints and on-device model deployment, can partially alleviate some issues but often with limitations, failing to fundamentally resolve these challenges. This paper proposes a new paradigm called AgentRR (Agent Record & Replay), which introduces the classical record-and-replay mechanism into AI agent frameworks. The core idea is to: 1. Record an agent's interaction trace with its environment and internal decision process during task execution, 2. Summarize this trace into a structured "experience" encapsulating the workflow and constraints, and 3. Replay these experiences in subsequent similar tasks to guide the agent's behavior. We detail a multi-level experience abstraction method and a check function mechanism in AgentRR: the former balances experience specificity and generality, while the latter serves as a trust anchor to ensure completeness and safety during replay. In addition, we explore multiple application modes of AgentRR, including user-recorded task demonstration, large-small model collaboration and privacy-aware agent execution, and envision an experience repository for sharing and reusing knowledge to further reduce deployment cost.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Some approaches focus on success-based distillation, where systems such as AgentRR (Feng et al., 2025) and AWM (Wang et al., 2024m) summarize overall task plans from successful cases.”
From Memory in the Age of AI Agents (2025) · cites this paper as Feng et al., 2025
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models
Yao, S., Zhao, J., Yu, D., Du, N., Shafran, I., Narasimhan, K., & Cao, Y. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.03629 · Cited by 608
Stop Overthinking: A Survey on Efficient Reasoning for Large Language Models
Sui, Y., Chuang, Y.-N., Wang, G., Zhang, J., Zhang, T., Yuan, J., Liu, H., Wen, A., Zhong, S., Zou, N., et al. (2025) · arXiv · Cited by 517 · cited 2×
“Complex tasks that require an agent to reason or plan over multiple steps are often bottlenecked by the LLM’s inference speed and the overhead of iterative prompt exchanges[49, 70].”
Self-citationAgentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Survey on Agentic RAG
Singh, A., Ehtesham, A., Kumar, S., Khoei, T. T., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.09136 · Cited by 36
Cerebras-GPT: Open Compute-Optimal Language Models Trained on the Cerebras Wafer-Scale Cluster
Dey, N., Gosal, G., Zhiming, Chen, Khachane, H., Marshall, W., Pathria, R., Tom, M., & Hestness, J. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2304.03208 · Cited by 23
Agents: An Open-source Framework for Autonomous Language Agents
Zhou, W., Jiang, Y. E., Li, L., Wu, J., Wang, T., Qiu, S., Zhang, J., Chen, J., Wu, R., Wang, S., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.07870 · Cited by 21
Self-citationAbsolute Zero: Reinforced Self-play Reasoning with Zero Data
Zhao, A., Wu, Y., Yue, Y., Wu, T., Xu, Q., Yue, Y., Lin, M., Wang, S., Wu, Q., Zheng, Z., et al. (2025) · arXiv · Cited by 13 · cited 1×
“Other approaches attempt to enable the model to self-correct[80, 89], but this process lacks any formal safety guarantees.”
$R^2$-Guard: Robust Reasoning Enabled LLM Guardrail via Knowledge-Enhanced Logical Reasoning
Kang, M., & Li, B. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.05557 · Cited by 1
Cited by
Memory in the Age of AI Agents
Hu, Y., Liu, S., Yue, Y., Zhang, G., Liu, B., Zhu, F., Lin, J., Guo, H., Dou, S., Xi, Z., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.13564 · Cited by 389
Self-citationA Survey of Context Engineering for Large Language Models
Mei, L., Yao, J., Ge, Y., Wang, Y., Bi, B., Cai, Y., Liu, J., Li, M., Li, Z.-Z., Zhang, D., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.13334 · Cited by 281
Memp: Exploring Agent Procedural Memory
Fang, R., Liang, Y., Wang, X., Wu, J., Qiao, S., Xie, P., Huang, F., Chen, H., & Zhang, N. (2026) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2026 · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.findings-acl.866 · Cited by 174
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Feng, E., Zhou, W., Liu, Z., Chen, L., Dong, Y., Zhang, C., Zhao, Y., Du, D., Hua, Z., Xia, Y., & Chen, H.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2025
- arXiv
- 2505.17716
- References
- 7
- Type
- Preprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Get Experience from Practice: LLM Agents with Record & Replay. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.2505.17716
- The paper
- Feng, E., Zhou, W., Liu, Z., Chen, L., Dong, Y., Zhang, C., Zhao, Y., Du, D., Hua, Z., Xia, Y., & Chen, H. (2025). Get Experience from Practice: LLM Agents with Record & Replay. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2505.17716
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.