The DOI matches its DataCite record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 50 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Reasoning RAG via System 1 or System 2: A Survey on Reasoning Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Industry Challenges
Open accessAbstract
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as a powerful framework to overcome the knowledge limitations of Large Language Models (LLMs) by integrating external retrieval with language generation. While early RAG systems based on static pipelines have shown effectiveness in well-structured tasks, they struggle in real-world scenarios requiring complex reasoning, dynamic retrieval, and multi-modal integration. To address these challenges, the field has shifted toward Reasoning Agentic RAG, a paradigm that embeds decision-making and adaptive tool use directly into the retrieval process. In this paper, we present a comprehensive review of Reasoning Agentic RAG methods, categorizing them into two primary systems: predefined reasoning, which follows fixed modular pipelines to boost reasoning, and agentic reasoning, where the model autonomously orchestrates tool interaction during inference. We analyze representative techniques under both paradigms, covering architectural design, reasoning strategies, and tool coordination. Finally, we discuss key research challenges and propose future directions to advance the flexibility, robustness, and applicability of reasoning agentic RAG systems. Our collection of the relevant research has been organized into a https://github.com/ByebyeMonica/Reasoning-Agentic-RAG.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This survey reviews Reasoning Agentic RAG, categorizing methods into predefined reasoning (System 1-like fixed pipelines) and agentic reasoning (System 2-like autonomous tool use). It analyzes representative techniques and outlines future directions for flexibility, robustness, and applicability.
Key findings
- Proposes a taxonomy of Reasoning Agentic RAG into two paradigms: predefined reasoning, with route-based, loop-based, tree-based, and hybrid-modular workflows; and agentic reasoning, with prompt-based and training-based approaches.
- Aligns predefined reasoning with System 1 thinking (fast, structured, efficient) and agentic reasoning with System 2 thinking (slow, deliberative, adaptive).
- Reviews representative methods including RAGate, Self-RAG, CRAG, RAPTOR, MCTS-RAG, Adaptive-RAG, and Modular-RAG for predefined reasoning; ReAct, Self-Ask, function calling, and Search-o1 for prompt-based agentic reasoning; and DeepRetrieval, Search-R1, R1-Searcher, ReZero, and DeepResearcher for training-based agentic reasoning.
- Identifies future research directions: advanced tool configuration, finer-grained process-oriented reward functions, improving retrieval efficiency, and enhancing generalization and robustness in dynamic environments. No quantitative performance numbers are reported.
Methods
- Design: a survey/review of Reasoning Agentic RAG methods, organizing the field into predefined reasoning and agentic reasoning paradigms.
- Data: prior research literature on RAG, Agentic RAG, and reasoning agentic RAG, with representative techniques listed and summarized in tables.
- Analysis: qualitative categorization of architectural designs, reasoning strategies, and tool coordination, plus discussion of research challenges and future directions.
Limitations
- The paper does not state explicit limitations of the survey itself.
- Evident from the text: it is a qualitative review with no empirical experiments, datasets, or quantitative comparisons reported.
- Evident from the text: no systematic search or inclusion protocol is described, and coverage is organized around selected representative techniques and tables.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 50 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Premisecitation
Prompt-based methods leverage in-context reasoning and instruction-following capabilities of pretrained LLMs.
“The first is prompt-based methods, which leverages the in-context reasoning and instructionfollowing capabilities of pretrained LLMs [Yao et al., 2023;Press et al., 2023;Li et al., 2025a].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Yao et al., 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Press et al., 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Li et al., 2025a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
DeepRetrieval focuses on improving the quality of search queries generated by the LLM agent.
“DeepRe-trieval [Jiang et al., 2025] focuses specifically on improving the quality of the search queries generated by the LLM agent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jiang et al., 2025
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) are designed to excel at complex, multi-step reasoning tasks.
“These models, sometimes developed through techniques like large-scale reinforcement learning (e.g., models analogous to OpenAI's o1 [Ope-nAI et al., 2024], DeepSeek-R1 [DeepSeek-AI et al., 2025]), are designed to excel at complex, multi-step reasoning tasks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites OpenAI et al., 2024
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites DeepSeek-AI et al., 2025
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Early RAG systems based on static pipelines struggle in real-world scenarios requiring complex reasoning, dynamic retrieval, and multi-modal integration.
“While early RAG systems based on static pipelines have shown effectiveness in well-structured tasks, they struggle in real-world scenarios requiring complex reasoning, dynamic retrieval, and multi-modal integration.”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · plain
“Despite the effectiveness of basic RAG methods, they often struggle when applied to real-world, industrial-scale applications involving complex and heterogeneous data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Wang et al., 2025 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- cites Wang et al., 2024b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Ma et al., 2024
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Rests on an assumption: Traditional RAG methods have demonstrated strong performance when queries are well-formed and the necessary information is readily available in the retrieved context.
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · plain
- Premisecitation
Search-o1 integrates an Agentic RAG Mechanism where the LRM dynamically triggers search queries based on self-assessed knowledge gaps.
“It integrates two core components: an Agentic RAG Mechanism where the LRM dynamically triggers search queries based on self-assessed knowledge gaps, and a Reason-in-Documents Module that processes retrieved content to dist ill relevant information into a refined format, thereby minimizing noise and maintaining the LRM's reasoning integrity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Li et al., 2025a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
DeepResearcher performs end-to-end RL training directly within real-world web environments, moving beyond controlled environments or static corpora.
“DeepResearcher [Zheng et al., 2025] pushes the boundaries of training-based Agentic RAG by moving beyond controlled environments or static corpora to perform end-to-end RL training directly within real-world web environments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zheng et al., 2025
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Search-R1 has shown significant performance improvements over various RAG baselines on question-answering datasets.
“Search-R1 has shown significant performance improvements over various RAG baselines on question-answering datasets.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jin et al., 2025
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
DeepRetrieval frames query generation or rewriting as an RL problem, training the LLM to transform an initial user query into a more effective query for downstream retrieval systems.
“It frames the task of query generation or rewriting as an RL problem, training the LLM to transform an initial user query into a more effective query for downstream retrieval systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jiang et al., 2025
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Search-o1 is specifically designed to enhance LRMs by tackling knowledge insufficiency during long, step-by-step reasoning chains.
“The Search-o1 framework [Li et al., 2025a] is specifically designed to enhance LRMs by tackling knowledge insufficiency during long, step-by-step reasoning chains.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Li et al., 2025a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
End-to-end training in realistic web environments is crucial for developing robust and capable research agents.
“The results strongly suggest that end-to-end training in realistic web environments is crucial for developing robust and capable research agents, moving closer to the capabilities hinted at by proprietary systems like OpenAI's Deep Research [OpenAI, 2025] or Grok's DeeperSearch.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites OpenAI, 2025
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Route-based methods selectively trigger retrieval based on context or model uncertainty.
“route-based methods selectively trigger retrieval based on context or model uncertainty, such as low confidence scores or ambiguous intermediate outputs [Wang et al., 2024a]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wang et al., 2024a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
In ReZero, the reward for retrying is conditional upon the agent successfully completing the task, indicated by generating a final answer enclosed in <answer> tags.
“Crucially, this reward for retrying is conditional upon the agent successfully completing the task, indicated by generating a final answer enclosed in <answer> tags.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dao and Le, 2025
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Search-o1 integrates a Reason-in-Documents Module that processes retrieved content to distill relevant information into a refined format, minimizing noise and maintaining the LRM's reasoning integrity.
“It integrates two core components: an Agentic RAG Mechanism where the LRM dynamically triggers search queries based on self-assessed knowledge gaps, and a Reason-in-Documents Module that processes retrieved content to dist ill relevant information into a refined format, thereby minimizing noise and maintaining the LRM's reasoning integrity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Li et al., 2025a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Search-R1 extends RL-based reasoning frameworks by integrating search engine interaction directly into the learning loop.
“It extends RL-based reasoning frameworks (like DeepSeek-R1) by integrating search engine interaction directly into the learning loop.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jin et al., 2025
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
DeepRetrieval bypasses the need for expensive and potentially suboptimal supervised query datasets by directly optimizing for retrieval performance.
“By directly optimizing for the end goal (retrieval performance), it bypasses the need for expensive and potentially suboptimal supervised query datasets.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jiang et al., 2025
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
DeepRetrieval uses metrics such as recall@k, NDCG, or Hits@N obtained from executing the generated query against a restricted real search engine or document collection to provide feedback to the LLM.
“Metrics such as recall@k, Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain (NDCG), or evidence-seeking retrieval accuracy (Hits@N) obtained from executing the generated query against a restricted real search engine (like PubMed) or document collection are used to provide feedback to the LLM.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jiang et al., 2025
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
ReZero addresses the scenario where an initial search query fails to retrieve necessary information, potentially causing the LLM agent to halt prematurely or generate a suboptimal response.
“It addresses the common scenario where an initial search query might fail to retrieve the necessary information, potentially causing the LLM agent to halt prematurely or generate a suboptimal response.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dao and Le, 2025
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Search-R1 trains the LLM to autonomously decide when to search and what to search for during a multi-step reasoning process.
“Search-R1 [Jin et al., 2025] tackles a different aspect of agentic search: training the LLM to autonomously decide when to search and what to search for during a multi-step reasoning process.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jin et al., 2025
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisenone given
Agentic reasoning has two primary methods: prompt-based and training-based.
“There are two primary methods for implementing agentic reasoning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
The field has shifted toward Reasoning Agentic RAG, a paradigm that embeds decision-making and adaptive tool use directly into the retrieval process.
“To address these challenges, the field has shifted toward Reasoning Agentic RAG, a paradigm that embeds decision-making and adaptive tool use directly into the retrieval process.”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · plain
“To address these limitations of basic RAG in handling complex, real-world tasks, recent research has turned to Agentic RAG [Ravuru et al., 2024], a paradigm that tightly integrates retrieval with reasoning and decision-making.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ravuru et al., 2024 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · plain
- Interpretationreasoning
In ReZero, the conditionality of the retry reward upon task completion prevents the agent from accumulating rewards simply by retrying indefinitely without making progress.
“This conditionality prevents the agent from accumulating rewards simply by retrying indefinitely without making progress.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
R1-Searcher proposes a two-stage, outcome-based RL approach for enhancing search capabilities.
“The related R1-Searcher [Song et al., 2025] framework also proposes a similar two-stage, outcome-based RL approach for enhancing search capabilities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Song et al., 2025
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
DeepResearcher demonstrated substantial performance improvements over prompt-engineering baselines and RAG-based RL agents trained on static corpora, particularly on open-domain research tasks.
“Deep-Researcher demonstrated substantial performance improvements over prompt-engineering baselines and RAG-based RL agents trained on static corpora, particularly on open-domain research tasks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zheng et al., 2025
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) overcomes the knowledge limitations of Large Language Models (LLMs) by integrating external retrieval with language generation.
“Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) [Chen et al., 2024;Lewis et al., 2020;Gao et al., 2023] has attracted significant attention as a promising approach to overcome the knowledge limitations of LLMs resulting from static pretraining.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Chen et al., 2024
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Lewis et al., 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Gao et al., 2023 source
- Interpretationreasoning
The progression of training-based methods from Search-R1 to ReZero to DeepRetrieval to DeepResearcher reflects the growing sophistication of RL in agentic search.
“The progression for the training-based methods, from optimizing the decision process of when and what to query (Search-R1), to fostering persistence (ReZero), optimizing query formulation (DeepRetrieval), and managing real-world research workflows (DeepResearcher) reflects the growing sophistication of RL in agentic search.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
ReZero encourages the LLM to explore alternative queries or search strategies if the first attempt proves insufficient by directly rewarding the act of persistence when productive.
“By directly rewarding the act of persistence (when productive), ReZero encourages the LLM to explore alternative queries or search strategies if the first attempt proves insufficient.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dao and Le, 2025
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
DeepResearcher addresses a key limitation of many existing agents, whether prompt-engineered or trained in simulated/static RAG settings, which often struggle with the complexities of real-world web interaction.
“This addresses a key limitation of many existing agents, whether prompt-engineered or trained in simulated/static RAG settings, which often struggle with the complexities of real-world web interaction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zheng et al., 2025
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
DeepRetrieval's primary focus is on optimizing the content and formulation of the search query itself, compared to other RL methods.
“Compared to other RL methods, DeepRetrieval's primary focus is on optimizing the content and formulation of the search query itself.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jiang et al., 2025
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Training-based methods optimize models through reinforcement learning to determine when and how to invoke external tools.
“The second paradigm is trainingbased methods, where models are explicitly optimized through reinforcement learning, to determine when and how to invoke external tools [Jiang et al., 2025;Jin et al., 2025;Zheng et al., 2025].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Jiang et al., 2025
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Jin et al., 2025
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Zheng et al., 2025
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
ReZero introduces a dimension to RL-based agentic search by focusing on incentivizing persistence.
“ReZero (Retry-Zero) [Dao and Le, 2025] introduces another dimension to RL-based agentic search by specifically focusing on incentivizing persistence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dao and Le, 2025
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 16
- It may state two separate claims as one. 5
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationnone givenReasoning Agentic RAG methods can be categorized into two primary systems: predefined reasoning, which follow fixed modular pipelines to boost reasoning, and agentic reasoning, where the model autonomously orchestrates tool interaction during inference.
“In this paper, we present a comprehensive review of Reasoning Agentic RAG methods, categorizing them into two primary systems: predefined reasoning, which follow fixed modular pipelines to boost reasoning, and agentic reasoning, where the model autonomously orchestrates tool interaction during inference.”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · plain
“Within this paradigm, as shown in Figure 1, two major types of reasoning agentic systems have emerged based on how control and decision-making are handled: predefined reasoning, which follow structured, rule-based plans with fixed pipelines to boost reasoning for retrieval and generation; and agentic reasoning, where the model actively monitors its reasoning process and determines when and how to”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The categorization into predefined and agentic reasoning is exhaustive and mutually exclusive.
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · plain
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisereasoningPredefined reasoning follows fixed modular pipelines to boost reasoning.
“Predefined reasoning adopts structured and modular RAG pipelines where the retrieval and reasoning steps are explicitly designed, following fixed control pipeline.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
InterpretationreasoningPredefined reasoning resembles System 1 thinking: fast, structured, and efficient.
“Predefined reasoning resembles System 1 thinking: fast, structured, and efficient, relying on predefined heuristics and modular workflows that mirror habitual or rule-based cognition.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The dual-system theory from cognitive science is a valid framework for analyzing RAG paradigms.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
Premisenone givenBasic RAG workflows are limited by static control logic and lack the ability to reflect, adapt, or assess the sufficiency of retrieved information.
“Despite their effectiveness, basic RAG workflows are limited by static control logic and lack the ability to reflect, adapt, or assess the sufficiency of retrieved information.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Traditional RAG methods have demonstrated strong performance when queries are well-formed and the necessary information is readily available in the retrieved context.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationHybrid-modular frameworks compose specialized modules into a flexible but still rule-driven workflow.
“hybrid-modular frameworks compose specialized modules into a flexible but still rule-driven workflow [Jeong et al., 2024;Gao et al., 2024]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Jeong et al., 2024
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Gao et al., 2024
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationLoop-based methods enable limited iteration through retrieval-feedback cycles, supporting multiple rounds of refinement.
“loop-based methods enable limited iteration through retrieval-feedback cycles, supporting multiple rounds of refinement [Asai et al., 2023;Yang et al., 2024b]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Asai et al., 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Yang et al., 2024b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningEffective information seeking by an agent involves a confluence of factors: query quality, strategic timing, resilience to failure, and adeptness in navigating realistic information environments.
“It reflects a growing appreciation that effective information seeking by an agent involves a confluence of factors: query quality, strategic timing, resilience to failure, and adeptness in navigating realistic information environments and so on.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone givenAgentic reasoning involves the model autonomously orchestrating tool interaction during inference.
“Agentic reasoning repositions the LLM as an active decision maker, that autonomously orchestrates retrieval and tool use throughout the reasoning process.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationTree-based methods organize information hierarchically to support structured exploration.
“tree-based methods organize information hierarchically to support structured exploration [Sarthi et al., 2024;Hu et al., 2025]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Sarthi et al., 2024
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Hu et al., 2025
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationThe Search-R1 framework utilizes a simple outcome-based reward function based on the correctness of the final answer compared to a ground truth.
“The framework utilizes a simple outcome-based reward function, typically based on the correctness of the final answer generated by the LLM (within <answer> tags) compared to a ground truth, avoiding the complexity of designing intermediate process rewards.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jin et al., 2025
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationReZero positions itself as complementary to DeepRetrieval, with DeepRetrieval focusing on optimizing a single refined query and ReZero emphasizing multiple retrieval attempts when needed.
“ReZero positions itself as complementary to frameworks like DeepRetrieval; while DeepRetrieval focuses on optimizing a single refined query, ReZero emphasizes the value of making multiple retrieval attempts when needed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Dao and Le, 2025
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Jiang et al., 2025
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Premisenone givenAgentic reasoning empowers the LLM to act as an autonomous agent, dynamically deciding how to interact with external tools based on its current reasoning state.
“Agentic reasoning empowers the LLM to act as an autonomous agent, dynamically deciding how to interact with external tools based on its current reasoning state.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationPredefined reasoning spans four architectural variants: route-based, loop-based, tree-based, and hybrid-modular.
“In general, predefined reasoning spans several architectural variants: route-based methods selectively trigger retrieval based on context or model uncertainty, such as low confidence scores or ambiguous intermediate outputs [Wang et al., 2024a]; loop-based methods enable limited iteration through retrieval-feedback cycles, supporting multiple rounds of refinement [Asai et al., 2023;Yang et al., 2”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Wang et al., 2024a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Asai et al., 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Sarthi et al., 2024
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim.
PremisereasoningAgentic RAG embeds reasoning and decision-making into the retrieval process.
“Thus, Agentic RAG has proposed to embed reasoning and decision-making into the retrieval process.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
InterpretationreasoningAgentic reasoning aligns with System 2 thinking: slow, deliberative, and adaptive.
“In contrast, agentic reasoning aligns more closely with System 2 thinking: slow, deliberative, and adaptive.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The dual-system theory from cognitive science is a valid framework for analyzing RAG paradigms.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Premisenone givenPredefined reasoning depends on structured, rule-based pipelines where the retrieval and reasoning stages are modularized and fixed in advance.
“Predefined reasoning depends on structured, rule-based pipelines where the retrieval and reasoning stages are modularized and fixed in advance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationDeepResearcher employs RL (specifically GRPO with an F1 score-based reward for answer accuracy) to train agents that interact with live web search APIs and browse actual webpages.
“The framework employs RL (specifically GRPO with an F1 score-based reward for answer accuracy ) to train agents that interact with live web search APIs and browse actual webpages.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zheng et al., 2025
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationIn the Search-R1 framework, the search engine is modeled as part of the RL environment.
“In the Search-R1 framework, the search engine is modeled as part of the RL environment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jin et al., 2025
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
The paper relies on this without support.
Traditional RAG methods have demonstrated strong performance when queries are well-formed and the necessary information is readily available in the retrieved context.
“Traditional RAG methods have demonstrated strong performance when queries are well-formed and the necessary information is readily available in the retrieved context.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Agentic reasoning has shown strong performance in open-domain QA, scientific reasoning, and multi-stage decision-making scenarios.
“Owing to its autonomy and adaptability, agentic reasoning has shown strong performance in open-domain QA, scientific reasoning, and multi-stage decision-making scenarios.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The dual-system theory from cognitive science is a valid framework for analyzing RAG paradigms.
“By framing these paradigms through the lens of cognitive systems, we highlight the trade-off between efficiency and adaptability, and the growing capacity of agentic RAG to emulate more sophisticated, human-like problem solving.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The categorization into predefined and agentic reasoning is exhaustive and mutually exclusive.
“Within this paradigm, as shown in Figure 1, two major types of reasoning agentic systems have emerged based on how control and decision-making are handled: predefined reasoning, which follow structured, rule-based plans with fixed pipelines to boost reasoning for retrieval and generation; and agentic reasoning, where the model actively monitors its reasoning process and determines when and how to”
The authors state this as an assumption.
An LLM with superior intrinsic reasoning abilities will be better equipped to manage the complexities of an Agentic RAG workflow.
“The underlying premise is that an LLM with superior intrinsic reasoning abilities will be better equipped to manage the complexities of an Agentic RAG workflow, including decomposing challenging queries, planning information-gathering steps, assessing the relevance and utility of retrieved information, and synthesizing knowledge effectively.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Retrieved documents often contain verbose, noisy or contradictory content that can disrupt the coherence of the LLM's reasoning process.
“Furthermore, retrieved documents, whether in long-context models or standard RAG, often contain verbose, noisy or contradictory content that can disrupt the coherence of the LLM's reasoning process.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Prompt-based methods' performance in complex tool-use scenarios can be inconsistent.
“While prompt-based methods leverage the inherent capabilities of LLMs, their performance in complex tool-use scenarios can be inconsistent.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Training-based approaches, particularly those utilizing Reinforcement Learning (RL), enable the LLM agent to learn sophisticated strategies through trial and error, directly optimizing its actions towards specific goals such as maximizing retrieval effectiveness or overall task success.
“Training-based approaches, particularly those utilizing Reinforcement Learning (RL), enable the LLM agent to learn sophisticated strategies through trial and error, directly optimizing its actions towards specific goals such as maximizing retrieval effectiveness or overall task success.”
The paper relies on this without support.
RL enables agents to develop more robust and strategic interaction patterns than prompting alone.
“RL enables agents to develop more robust and strategic interaction patterns than prompting alone.”
Citations
Cites
A Survey of Large Language Models
Zhao, W. X., Zhou, K., Li, J., Tang, T., Dong, Z., Hou, Y., Zhang, B., Min, Y., Zhang, J., Liu, P., et al. (2026) · Frontiers of Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s11704-026-60308-3 · Cited by 2,093
Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey
Gao, Y., Xiong, Y., Gao, X., Jia, K., Pan, J., Bi, Y., Dai, Y., Sun, J., Wang, M., & Wang, H. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.10997 · Cited by 876
Retrieval-Augmented Generation for AI-Generated Content: A Survey
Zhao, P., Zhang, H., Yu, Q., Wang, Z., Geng, Y., Fu, F., Yang, L., Zhang, W., Jiang, J., & Cui, B. (2026) · Data Science and Engineering · doi:10.1007/s41019-025-00335-5 · Cited by 871
Siren's Song in the AI Ocean: A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models
Zhang, Y., Li, Y., Cui, L., Cai, D., Liu, L., Fu, T., Huang, X., Zhao, E., Zhang, Y., Chen, Y., et al. (2025) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli.a.16 · Cited by 534
From System 1 to System 2: A Survey of Reasoning Large Language Models
Zhang, D., Li, Z., Zhang, M.-L., Zhang, J., Liu, Z., Yao, Y., Xu, H., Zheng, J., Chen, X., Zhang, Y., et al. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2025.3637037 · Cited by 509
Self-citationVisRAG: Vision-based Retrieval-augmented Generation on Multi-modality DocumentsPreprint
Shi, Y., Tang, C., Xu, B., Cui, J., Ran, J., Yan, Y., Liu, Z., Wang, S., Han, X., Liu, Z., et al. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.10594 · Cited by 229
Li, J., Yuan, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.10446 · Cited by 168
Ma, Z.-A., Lan, T., Tu, R.-C., Hu, Y., Zhu, Y.-S., Zhang, T., Huang, H., Wu, Z., & Mao, X.-L. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.16365 · Cited by 32
Yu, Q., Xiao, Z., Li, B., Wang, Z., Chen, C., & Zhang, W. (2025) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/3726302.3730288 · Cited by 29
Are Large Language Models Good Statisticians?
Zhu, Y., Du, S., Li, B., Luo, Y., & Tang, N. (2024) · neural information processing systems · doi:10.52202/079017-2005 · Cited by 22
LLM2: Let Large Language Models Harness System 2 Reasoning
Yang, C., Shi, C., Li, S., Shui, B., Yang, Y., & Lam, W. P. (2025) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.naacl-short.15 · Cited by 10
Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Time Series Analysis
Ravuru, C., Sakhinana, S. S., & Runkana, V. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2408.14484
Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Conflicting Evidence
Wang, H., Prasad, A., Stengel-Eskin, E., & Bansal, M. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.13079
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- Jiawei Chen, Hongyu Lin, et al. Bench- marking large language models in retrieval-augmented gen- eration. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artifi- cial Intelligence, volume 38, pages 17754-17762, 2024.
- Lei Huang, Weijiang Yu, et al. A survey on hallucination in large language models: Principles, tax- onomy, challenges, and open questions. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 43(2):1-55, 2025.
- Kong et al., 2024] Yilun Kong, Jingqing Ruan, et al. Tptu- v2: Boosting task planning and tool usage of large language model-based agents in real-world industry systems. In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: Industry Track, pages 371-385, 2024.
- Patrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, et al. Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive nlp tasks. Advances in neural information processing sys- tems, 33:9459-9474, 2020.
- Lin et al., 2023a] Weizhe Lin, Jinghong Chen, et al. Fine- grained late-interaction multi-modal retrieval for retrieval augmented visual question answering. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:22820-22840, 2023.
- Lin et al., 2023b] Xi Victoria Lin, Xilun Chen, et al. Ra- dit: Retrieval-augmented dual instruction tuning. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representa- tions, 2023.
- Ma et al., 2023] Xinbei Ma, Yeyun Gong, et al. Query rewrit- ing in retrieval-augmented large language models. In Pro- ceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 5303-5315, 2023.
- Press et al., 2023]
- Ofir Press, Muru Zhang, et al. Measuring and narrowing the compositionality gap in language models, 2023.
- Rawte et al., 2023] Vipula Rawte, Swagata Chakraborty, et al. The troubling emergence of hallucination in large lan- guage models-an extensive definition, quantification, and prescriptive remediations. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2023.
- Stephen Robertson, Hugo Zaragoza, et al. The probabilistic relevance framework: Bm25 and beyond. Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval, 3(4):333-389, 2009.
- Ruan et al., 2023] Jingqing Ruan, Yihong Chen, et al. Tptu: Task planning and tool usage of large language model- based ai agents. In NeurIPS 2023 Foundation Models for Decision Making Workshop, 2023.
- Aditi Singh. Exploring language models: A comprehensive survey and analysis. In 2023 International Conference on Research Methodologies in Knowledge Man- agement, Artificial Intelligence and Telecommunication En- gineering (RMKMATE), pages 1-4. IEEE, 2023.
- Wang et al., 2024b] Yu Wang, Nedim Lipka, et al. Knowl- edge graph prompting for multi-document question answer- ing. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 38, pages 19206-19214, 2024.
- Yang et al., 2024b] Xiao Yang, Kai Sun, et al. Crag- comprehensive rag benchmark. Advances in Neural In- formation Processing Systems, 37:10470-10490, 2024.
- Zhang et al., ] Bin Zhang, Hangyu Mao, et al. Controlling large language model-based agents for large-scale decision- making: An actor-critic approach. In ICLR 2024 Workshop on Large Language Model (LLM) Agents.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Survey of LLM-based Deep Search Agents: Paradigm, Optimization, Evaluation, and ChallengesPreprint
Xi, Y., Lin, J., Xiao, Y., Zhou, Z., Shan, R., Gao, T., Zhu, J., Liu, W., Yu, Y. H., & Zhang, W. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.05668 · Cited by 81
A Survey of Model Architectures in Information RetrievalPreprint
Xu, Z., Mo, F., Huang, Z., Zhang, C., Yu, P., Wang, B., Lin, J., & Srikumar, V. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.14822 · Cited by 41
(2025) · doi:10.1007/s11432-025-4665-8 · Cited by 34
Lin, M., Wu, Z., Xu, Z., Liu, H., Tang, X., He, Q., Aggarwal, C. C., Liu, H., Zhang, X., & Wang, S. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.16724 · Cited by 34
A Survey of Context Engineering for Large Language Models
Mei, L., Yao, J., Ge, Y., Wang, Y., Bi, B., Cai, Y., Liu, J., Li, M., Li, Z.-Z., Zhang, D., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.13334 · Cited by 281
Self-citationBeyond Correctness: Rewarding Faithful Reasoning in Retrieval-Augmented GenerationPreprint
Xu, Z., Wu, Z., Zhou, Y., Feng, A., Zhou, K., Woo, S., Ramnath, K., Tian, Y., Xuan, Q., Qiu, W., et al. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.13272 · Cited by 13
Wampler, D., Nielson, D., & Seddighi, A. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.05264 · Cited by 11
X R : Cross-Modal Agents for Composed Image Retrieval
Yang, Z., Pang, W., & Yuan, Y. (2026) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3774904.3792276 · Cited by 7
Liu, Y., Jia, Z., Gao, X., Xu, K., & Xiong, Y. (2026) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3774904.3792700 · Cited by 5
From reviews to real-time: dynamic evidence in dentistry
Gavrilova, A. V., & Galli, C. (2026) · Evidence-Based Dentistry · doi:10.1038/s41432-026-01206-2 · Cited by 4
AgenticRAGTracer: A Hop-Aware Benchmark for Diagnosing Multi-Step Retrieval Reasoning in Agentic RAG
You, Q., Yu, W., Liang, H., Wong, Z. H., & Zhang, W. (2026) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.findings-acl.66 · Cited by 4
Facilitating Long Context Understanding via Supervised Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
Lin, J., Wong, A., Tian, X., He, S., Wei, H., Han, M., & Luo, J. (2025) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-main.615 · Cited by 4
Lin, H., Liang, J., Wu, Y., Zhao, R., Zeng, Z., & Li, Z. (2026) · IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE) · doi:10.1109/case69030.2026.11704302 · Cited by 3
Self-citationData-Centric Perspectives on Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Survey
Deng, J., Huang, J., Wong, Z. H., Liang, H., Xu, Q., Cui, B., & Zhang, W. (2026) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.findings-acl.78 · Cited by 2
BPMN DMN decision table generation based on agentic AI for critical applications
Meddeb, S., Batti, S., & Fathallah, H. (2026) · Business Process Management Journal · doi:10.1108/bpmj-08-2025-1254 · Cited by 2
Wu, H., Wang, C., Sun, C., Lu, C., Chen, Y.-H., Zhang, Z., & Feng, X. (2026) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.findings-acl.648 · Cited by 2
A Survey of Large Language Model-Based Search Agents
Xi, Y., Lin, J., Xiao, Y., Zhou, Z., Shan, R., Gao, T., Zhu, J., Liu, W., Yu, Y. H., & Zhang, W. (2026) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.acl-long.374 · Cited by 2
Aljohani, B., & Aljuhani, A. (2026) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.3642 · Cited by 1
Du, G., Hu, Y., Wang, W., Yang, Y., & Gao, J. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.09723 · Cited by 1
Yuan, Y., Wang, X., & Lei, S. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.05952 · Cited by 1
An Integrative Approach to LLM Literature with the Combination of QLoRa, SFT and Agentic RAG
Güngör, A., Emir, B. N., Yılmaz, S., Akdağ, M., & Berkol, A. (2025) · International Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies and Innovative Technologies · doi:10.36287/ijmsit.9.2.10
A Silent Multi-Agent Recommendation Engine with Graph-Augmented Memory for Immersive B2B E-Commerce
Eleuterio, D. S., Oliveira, P. F., & Matos, P. J. (2026) · DROPS (Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Center for Informatics) · doi:10.4230/oasics.slate.2026.15
Training a Knowledge Base: Supervised Structure Learning for Agent-Curated Document StoresPreprint
Pan, Y., & Yu, H. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.21829
Metadata
- Authors
- Liang, J., Su, G., Lin, H., Wu, Y., Zhao, R., & Li, Z.
- Affiliations
- Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN)
- University of Georgia (US)
- South China University of Technology (CN)
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
- University of Cologne (DE)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2025
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2506.10408
- OpenAlex
- W4417351617
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 9
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Keywords
- agentic reasoning, large language models, dynamic retrieval, multimodal retrieval
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review