CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 1Psychiatry, Mental Health, NeuroscienceSpeech and dialogue systemsEthics and Social Impacts of AI

Psychologically Enhanced AI Agents

Open access
Besta, Maciej, Chandran, Shriram, Gerstenberger, Robert, Lindner, Mathis, Chrapek, Marcin, Martschat, Sebastian Hermann, Ghandi, Taraneh, Iff, Patrick +4 more·2025·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2509.04343arXiv 2509.04343
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

We introduce MBTI-in-Thoughts, a framework for enhancing the effectiveness of Large Language Model (LLM) agents through psychologically grounded personality conditioning. Drawing on the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI), our method primes agents with distinct personality archetypes via prompt engineering, enabling control over behavior along two foundational axes of human psychology, cognition and affect. We show that such personality priming yields consistent, interpretable behavioral biases across diverse tasks: emotionally expressive agents excel in narrative generation, while analytically primed agents adopt more stable strategies in game-theoretic settings. Our framework supports experimenting with structured multi-agent communication protocols and reveals that self-reflection prior to interaction improves cooperation and reasoning quality. To ensure trait persistence, we integrate the official 16Personalities test for automated verification. While our focus is on MBTI, we show that our approach generalizes seamlessly to other psychological frameworks such as Big Five, HEXACO, or Enneagram. By bridging psychological theory and LLM behavior design, we establish a foundation for psychologically enhanced AI agents without any fine-tuning.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2509.04343

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Researchers have discussed deliberately implementing human-like cognitive biases in AI systems to more closely mirror human decision-making.

    “Researchers have even discussed deliberately implementing human-like cognitive biases in AI systems to more closely mirror human decision-making (Besta et al. 2025;Hagendorff and Fabi 2023).”

    From Machine marketing: rethinking the customer in the age of generative AI (2026) · cites this paper as Besta et al. 2025

    The Introduction (p. 1) says the authors deliberately prime AI agents with MBTI personalities and find behavioral biases aligned with those profiles. Section 4.3 (p. 7) reports differences in the agents’ strategic decisions that the authors relate to psychological traits. The paper does not describe deliberately implementing human cognitive biases specifically to mirror human decision-making; its intervention is personality priming. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 82

  1. Abdulhai, M.; Crepy, C.; Valter, D.; Canny, J.; and Jaques, N. 2023. Moral Foundations of Large Language Models. In Proceedings of the AAAI 2023 Workshop on Representation Learning for Responsible Human-Centric AI , R 2 HCAI '23. Washington, DC, USA: Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence.
  2. Abramski, K.; Citraro, S.; Lombardi, L.; Rossetti, G.; and Stella, M. 2023. Cognitive Network Science Reveals Bias in GPT-3, GPT-3.5 Turbo, and GPT-4 Mirroring Math Anxiety in High-School Students. Big Data and Cognitive Computing , 7(3): 124:1-124:24.
  3. Arora, S.; Narayan, A.; Chen, M. F.; Orr, L.; Guha, N.; Bhatia, K.; Chami, I.; Sala, F.; and Re, C. 2023. Ask Me Anything: A Simple Strategy for Prompting Language Models. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations , ICLR '23. Kigali, Rwanda: OpenReview.
  4. Barrick, M. R.; and Mount, M. K. 1991. The Big Five Personality Dimensions and Job Performance: A MetaAnalysis. Personnel Psychology , 44(1): 1-26.
  5. Besta, M.; Barth, J.; Schreiber, E.; Kubicek, A.; Catarino, A.; Gerstenberger, R.; Nyczyk, P.; Iff, P.; Li, Y .; Houliston, S.; Sternal, M., Tomasz Copik; Kwa´ sniewski, G.; M¨ uller, J.; Flis, L.; Eberhard, H.; Chen, Z.; Niewiadomski, H.; and Hoefler, T. 2025a. Reasoning Language Models: A Blueprint. arXiv:2501.11223. · arXiv
  6. Besta, M.; Blach, N.; Kubicek, A.; Gerstenberger, R.; Podstawski, M.; Gianinazzi, L.; Gajda, J.; Lehmann, T.; Niewiadomski, H.; Nyczyk, P.; and Hoefler, T. 2024. Graph of Thoughts: Solving Elaborate Problems with Large Language Models. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , 38(16): 17682-17690.
  7. Besta, M.; Gerstenberger, R.; Fischer, M.; Podstawski, M.; Blach, N.; Egeli, B.; Mitenkov, G.; Chlapek, W.; Michalewicz, M.; Niewiadomski, H.; Mueller, J.; and Hoefler, T. 2023. The Graph Database Interface: Scaling Online Transactional and Analytical Graph Workloads to Hundreds of Thousands of Cores. In Proceedings of the International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis , SC '23, 22:1-22:18. Denver, CO, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. ISBN 9798400701092.
  8. Besta, M.; Iff, P.; Scheidl, F.; Osawa, K.; Dryden, N.; Podstawski, M.; Chen, T.; and Hoefler, T. 2022. Neural Graph Databases. In Rieck, B.; and Pascanu, R., eds., Proceedings of the First Learning on Graphs Conference (LoG '22) , volume 198 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research , 31:1-31:38. Virtual Event: PMLR.
  9. Besta, M.; Memedi, F.; Zhang, Z.; Gerstenberger, R.; Piao, G.; Blach, N.; Nyczyk, P.; Copik, M.; Kwa´ sniewski, G.; M¨ uller, J.; Gianinazzi, L.; Kubicek, A.; Niewiadomski, H.; O'Mahony, A.; Mutlu, O.; and Hoefler, T. 2025c. Demystifying Chains, Trees, and Graphs of Thoughts. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence .
  10. Besta, M.; Paleari, L.; Copik, M.; Gerstenberger, R.; Kubicek, A.; Nyczyk, P.; Iff, P.; Schreiber, E.; Srindran, T.; Lehmann, T.; Niewiadomski, H.; and Hoefler, T. 2025d. CheckEmbed: Effective Verification of LLM Solutions to Open-Ended Tasks. arXiv:2406.02524. · arXiv
  11. Besta, M.; Paleari, L.; Jiang, J. H. A.; Gerstenberger, R.; Wu, Y.; Hannesson, J. G.; Iff, P.; Kubicek, A.; Nyczyk, P.; Khimey, D.; Blach, N.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, T.; Ma, P.; Kwa´ sniewski, G.; Copik, M.; Niewiadomski, H.; and Hoefler, T. 2025e. Affordable AI Assistants with Knowledge Graph of Thoughts. arXiv:2504.02670. · arXiv
  12. Bonnefon, J.-F.; Rahwan, I.; and Shariff, A. 2024. The Moral Psychology of Artificial Intelligence. Annual Review of Psychology , 75: 653-675.
  13. Caron, G.; and Srivastava, S. 2023. Manipulating the Perceived Personality Traits of Language Models. In Bouamor, H.; Pino, J.; and Bali, K., eds., Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023 , 2370-2386. Singapore: Association for Computational Linguistics.
  14. Chen, J.; Liu, Z.; Huang, X.; Wu, C.; Liu, Q.; Jiang, G.; Pu, Y.; Lei, Y.; Chen, X.; Wang, X.; Zheng, K.; Lian, D.; and Chen, E. 2024. When Large Language Models Meet Personalization: Perspectives of Challenges and Opportunities. World Wide Web , 27(4): 42:1-42:45.
  15. Clarke, P. 2004. Encyclopedia of New Religious Movements . Routledge. ISBN 9780203484333.
  16. Coda-Forno, J.; Witte, K.; Jagadish, A. K.; Binz, M.; Akata, Z.; and Schulz, E. 2024. Inducing Anxiety in Large Language Models Increases Exploration and Bias. arXiv:2304.11111. · arXiv
  17. Cui, J.; Lv, L.; Wen, J.; Wang, R.; Tang, J.; Tian, Y.; and Yuan, L. 2024. Machine Mindset: An MBTI Exploration of Large Language Models. arXiv:2312.12999. · arXiv
  18. Dorner, F.; S¨ uhr, T.; Samadi, S.; and Kelava, A. 2023. Do Personality Tests Generalize to Large Language Models? In Proceedings of the Workshop on Socially Responsible Language Modelling Research at ICML '23 , SoLaR '23. New Orleans, LA, USA: OpenReview.
  19. Duan, S.; Yi, X.; Zhang, P.; Lu, T.; Xie, X.; and Gu, N. 2024. Denevil: Towards Deciphering and Navigating the Ethical Values of Large Language Models via Instruction Learning. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations , ICLR '24. Vienna, Austria: OpenReview.
  20. Fan, A.; Lewis, M.; and Dauphin, Y. 2018. Hierarchical Neural Story Generation. In Gurevych, I.; and Miyao, Y., eds., Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) , ACL '18, 889-898. Melbourne, Australia: Association for Computational Linguistics.
  21. Graves, M. 2023. Embodied Experience in Socially Participatory Artificial Intelligence. Zygon® , 58(4): 928-951.
  22. Guo, J.; Yang, B.; Yoo, P.; Lin, B. Y .; Iwasawa, Y .; and Matsuo, Y. 2024. Suspicion Agent: Playing Imperfect Information Games with Theory of Mind Aware GPT-4. In Proceedings of the First Conference on Language Modeling , COLM '24. Philadelphia, PA, USA: OpenReview.
  23. Gupta, A.; Song, X.; and Anumanchipalli, G. 2024. SelfAssessment Tests Are Unreliable Measures of LLM Personality. In Belinkov, Y.; Kim, N.; Jumelet, J.; Mohebbi, H.; Mueller, A.; and Chen, H., eds., Proceedings of the 7th BlackboxNLP Workshop: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP , BlackboxNLP '24, 301-314. Miami, FL, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
  24. Hagendorff, T. 2024. Deception Abilities Emerged in Large Language Models. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 121(24): e2317967121:1-e2317967121:8.
  25. Hagendorff, T.; Dasgupta, I.; Binz, M. B.; Chan, S. C.; Lampinen, A.; Wang, J. X.; Akata, Z.; and Schulz, E. 2024. Machine Psychology. arXiv:2303.13988. · arXiv
  26. Hu, J.; Dong, T.; Gang, L.; Ma, H.; Zou, P.; Sun, X.; Guo, D.; Yang, X.; and Wang, M. 2025. PsycoLLM: Enhancing LLM for Psychological Understanding and Evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems , 12(2): 539-551.
  27. Huang, J.-t.; Jiao, W.; Lam, M. H.; Li, E. J.; Wang, W.; and Lyu, M. 2024a. On the Reliability of Psychological Scales on Large Language Models. In Al-Onaizan, Y.; Bansal, M.; and Chen, Y.-N., eds., Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , EMNLP '24, 6152-6173. Miami, FL, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
  28. Huang, J.-t.; Lam, M. H.; Li, E. J.; Ren, S.; Wang, W.; Jiao, W.; Tu, Z.; and Lyu, M. R. 2024b. Apathetic or Empathetic? Evaluating LLMs' Emotional Alignments with Humans. In Globerson, A.; Mackey, L.; Belgrave, D.; Fan, A.; Paquet, U.; Tomczak, J.; and Zhang, C., eds., Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS '24) , volume 37 of Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 9705397087. Vancouver, Canada: Curran Associates.
  29. Huang, J.-t.; Wang, W.; Li, E. J.; Lam, M. H.; Ren, S.; Yuan, Y.; Jiao, W.; Tu, Z.; and Lyu, M. R. 2024c. On the Humanity of Conversational AI: Evaluating the Psychological Portrayal of LLMs. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations , ICLR '24. Vienna, Austria: OpenReview.
  30. Huang, X. Y.; Vishnubhotla, K.; and Rudzicz, F. 2024. The GPT-WritingPrompts Dataset: A Comparative Analysis of Character Portrayal in Short Stories. arXiv:2406.16767. · arXiv
  31. Jiang, G.; Xu, M.; Zhu, S.-C.; Han, W.; Zhang, C.; and Zhu, Y. 2023. Evaluating and Inducing Personality in Pre-Trained Language Models. In Oh, A.; Naumann, T.; Globerson, A.; Saenko, K.; Hardt, M.; and Levine, S., eds., Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS '23) , volume 36 of Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 1062210643. New Orleans, LA, USA: Curran Associates.
  32. Jiang, H.; Zhang, X.; Cao, X.; Breazeal, C.; Roy, D.; and Kabbara, J. 2024. PersonaLLM: Investigating the Ability of Large Language Models to Express Personality Traits. In Duh, K.; Gomez, H.; and Bethard, S., eds., Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2024 , 3605-3627. Mexico City, Mexico: Association for Computational Linguistics.
  33. Jin, C.; Zhang, S.; Shu, T.; and Cui, Z. 2023. The Cultural Psychology of Large Language Models: Is ChatGPT a Holistic or Analytic Thinker? arXiv:2308.14242. · arXiv
  34. Kaddour, J.; Harris, J.; Mozes, M.; Bradley, H.; Raileanu, R.; and McHardy, R. 2023. Challenges and Applications of Large Language Models. arXiv:2307.10169. · arXiv
  35. Lee, K.; and Ashton, M. C. 2004. Psychometric Properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research , 39(2): 329-358.
  36. Li, C.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, K.; Hou, W.; Lian, J.; Luo, F.; Yang, Q.; and Xie, X. 2023. Large Language Models Understand and Can Be Enhanced by Emotional Stimuli. arXiv:2307.11760. · arXiv
  37. Liu, P.; Yuan, W.; Fu, J.; Jiang, Z.; Hayashi, H.; and Neubig, G. 2023. Pre-Train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processing. ACM Comput. Surv. , 55(9): 195:1-195:35.
  38. Liu, X.; Yu, H.; Zhang, H.; Xu, Y.; Lei, X.; Lai, H.; Gu, Y.; Ding, H.; Men, K.; Yang, K.; et al. 2024a. AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agents. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations , ICLR '24. Vienna, Austria: OpenReview.
  39. Liu, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Li, P.; Liu, Y.; and Yang, D. 2024b. A Dynamic LLM-Powered Agent Network for Task-Oriented Agent Collaboration. In Proceedings of the First Conference on Language Modeling , COLM '24. Philadelphia, PA, USA: OpenReview.
  40. Lor` e, N.; and Heydari, B. 2024. Strategic Behavior of Large Language Models and the Role of Game Structure Versus Contextual Framing. Scientific Reports , 14(1): 18490:118490:11.
  41. Mao, S.; Wang, X.; Wang, M.; Jiang, Y.; Xie, P.; Huang, F.; and Zhang, N. 2024. Editing Personality for Large Language Models. In Proceedings of the 13th National CCF Conference on Natural Language Processing and Chinese Computing: Proceedings, Part II , NLPCC '24, 241-254. Hangzhou, China: Springer. ISBN 978-981-97-9433-1.
  42. Miotto, M.; Rossberg, N.; and Kleinberg, B. 2022. Who is GPT-3? An Exploration of Personality, Values and Demographics. In Bamman, D.; Hovy, D.; Jurgens, D.; Keith, K.; O'Connor, B.; and Volkova, S., eds., Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Natural Language Processing and Computational Social Science , NLP+CSS '22, 218-227. Abu Dhabi, UAE: Association for Computational Linguistics.
  43. Noever, D.; and Hyams, S. 2023. AI Text-to-Behavior: A Study in Steerability. arXiv:2308.07326. · arXiv
  44. Ou, J.; Lu, J.; Liu, C.; Tang, Y.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, D.; and Gai, K. 2024. DialogBench: Evaluating LLMs as HumanLike Dialogue Systems. In Duh, K.; Gomez, H.; and Bethard, S., eds., Proceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers) , NAACL '24, 6137-6170. Mexico City, Mexico: Association for Computational Linguistics.
  45. Pan, K.; and Zeng, Y. 2023. Do LLMs Possess a Personality? Making the MBTI Test an Amazing Evaluation for Large Language Models. arXiv:2307.16180. · arXiv
  46. Patel, S. C.; and Fan, J. 2023. Identification and Description of Emotions by Current Large Language Models. bioRxiv:2023.07.17.549421.
  47. Pellert, M.; Lechner, C. M.; Wagner, C.; Rammstedt, B.; and Strohmaier, M. 2024. AI Psychometrics: Assessing the Psychological Profiles of Large Language Models through Psychometric Inventories. Perspectives on Psychological Science , 19(5): 808-826.
  48. Qian, C.; Liu, W.; Liu, H.; Chen, N.; Dang, Y.; Li, J.; Yang, C.; Chen, W.; Su, Y.; Cong, X.; Xu, J.; Li, D.; Liu, Z.; and Sun, M. 2024. ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software Development. In Ku, L.-W.; Martins, A.; and Srikumar, V., eds., Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) , ACL '24, 15174-15186. Bangkok, Thailand: Association for Computational Linguistics.
  49. Qiao, S.; Ou, Y.; Zhang, N.; Chen, X.; Yao, Y.; Deng, S.; Tan, C.; Huang, F.; and Chen, H. 2023. Reasoning with Language Model Prompting: A Survey. In Rogers, A.; BoydGraber, J.; and Okazaki, N., eds., Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) , ACL '23, 5368-5393. Toronto, Canada: Association for Computational Linguistics.
  50. Randall, K.; Isaacson, M.; and Ciro, C. 2017. Validity and Reliability of the Myers-Briggs Personality Type Indicator: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Best Practices in Health Professions Diversity , 10(1): 1-27.
  51. Reynolds, L.; and McDonell, K. 2021. Prompt Programming for Large Language Models: Beyond the Few-Shot Paradigm. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , CHI EA '21, 314:1-314:7. Yokohama, Japan: Association for Computing Machinery. ISBN 9781450380959.
  52. Scherrer, N.; Shi, C.; Feder, A.; and Blei, D. M. 2023. Evaluating the Moral Beliefs Encoded in LLMs. In Oh, A.; Naumann, T.; Globerson, A.; Saenko, K.; Hardt, M.; and Levine, S., eds., Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS '23) , volume 36 of Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 51778-51809. New Orleans, LA, USA: Curran Associates.
  53. Schweiger, D. M. 1985. Measuring Managerial Cognitive Styles: On the Logical Validity of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Journal of Business Research , 13(4): 315-328.
  54. Seo, W.; Yang, C.; and Kim, Y.-H. 2024. ChaCha: Leveraging Large Language Models to Prompt Children to Share Their Emotions About Personal Events. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , CHI '24, 903:1-903:20. Honolulu, HI, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. ISBN 9798400703300.
  55. Serapio-Garc´ ıa, G.; Safdari, M.; Crepy, C.; Sun, L.; Fitz, S.; Romero, P.; Abdulhai, M.; Faust, A.; and Matari´ c, M. 2025. Personality Traits in Large Language Models. arXiv:2307.00184. · arXiv
  56. Srivastava, A.; Rastogi, A.; Rao, A.; Shoeb, A. A. M.; Abid, A.; Fisch, A.; Brown, A. R.; Santoro, A.; Gupta, A.; GarrigaAlonso, A.; et al. 2023. Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and Extrapolating the Capabilities of Language Models. Transactions on Machine Learning Research . Featured Certification.
  57. Stein, R.; and Swan, A. B. 2019. Evaluating the Validity of Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Theory: A Teaching Tool and Window into Intuitive Psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass , 13(2): e12434.
  58. Subramonyam, H.; Pea, R.; Pondoc, C.; Agrawala, M.; and Seifert, C. 2024. Bridging the Gulf of Envisioning: Cognitive Challenges in Prompt Based Interactions with LLMs. In Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , CHI '24, 1039:1-1039:19. Honolulu, HI, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. ISBN 9798400703300.
  59. Sumers, T.; Yao, S.; Narasimhan, K.; and Griffiths, T. 2024. Cognitive Architectures for Language Agents. Transactions on Machine Learning Research . Survey Certification.
  60. Tu, Q.; Chen, C.; Li, J.; Li, Y.; Shang, S.; Zhao, D.; Wang, R.; and Yan, R. 2023. CharacterChat: Learning towards Conversational AI with Personalized Social Support. arXiv:2308.10278. · arXiv
  61. V. Ganesan, A.; Lal, Y. K.; Nilsson, A.; and Schwartz, H. 2023. Systematic Evaluation of GPT-3 for Zero-Shot Personality Estimation. In Barnes, J.; De Clercq, O.; and Klinger, R., eds., Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment, & Social Media Analysis , WASSA '23, 390-400. Toronto, Canada: Association for Computational Linguistics.
  62. Verma, M.; Bhambri, S.; and Kambhampati, S. 2023. Preference Proxies: Evaluating Large Language Models in Capturing Human Preferences in Human-AI Tasks. In Proceedings of the Many Facets of Preference-Based Learning Workshop at ICML '23 . Honolulu, HI, USA: OpenReview.
  63. Wang, D.; Yang, K.; Zhu, H.; Yang, X.; Cohen, A.; Li, L.; and Tian, Y. 2024a. Learning Personalized Alignment for Evaluating Open-Ended Text Generation. In Al-Onaizan, Y.; Bansal, M.; and Chen, Y.-N., eds., Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , EMNLP '24, 13274-13292. Miami, FL, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
  64. Wang, L.; Ma, C.; Feng, X.; Zhang, Z.; Yang, H.; Zhang, J.; Chen, Z.; Tang, J.; Chen, X.; Lin, Y.; Zhao, W. X.; Wei, Z.; and Wen, J. 2024b. A Survey on Large Language Model Based Autonomous Agents. Frontiers of Computer Science , 18(6): 186345:1-186345:16.
  65. Wang, X.; Li, X.; Yin, Z.; Wu, Y.; and Jia, L. 2023a. Emotional Intelligence of Large Language Models. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology , 17.
  66. Wang, X.; Wei, J.; Schuurmans, D.; Le, Q. V.; Chi, E. H.; Narang, S.; Chowdhery, A.; and Zhou, D. 2023b. SelfConsistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations , ICLR '23. Kigali, Rwanda: OpenReview.
  67. Wang, Z.; Mao, S.; Wu, W.; Ge, T.; Wei, F.; and Ji, H. 2024c. Unleashing the Emergent Cognitive Synergy in Large Language Models: A Task-Solving Agent through Multi-Persona Self-Collaboration. In Duh, K.; Gomez, H.; and Bethard, S., eds., Proceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers) , NAACL '24, 257-279. Mexico City, Mexico: Association for Computational Linguistics.
  68. Warriner, A. B.; Kuperman, V.; and Brysbaert, M. 2013. Norms of Valence, Arousal, and Dominance for 13,915 English Lemmas. Behavior Research Methods , 45(4): 11911207.
  69. Wei, J.; Wang, X.; Schuurmans, D.; Bosma, M.; Ichter, B.; Xia, F.; Chi, E.; Le, Q. V.; and Zhou, D. 2022. Chain-ofThought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models. In Koyejo, S.; Mohamed, S.; Agarwal, A.; Belgrave, D.; Cho, K.; and Oh, A., eds., Proceedings of the Thirty-Sixth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS '22) , volume 35 of Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 24824-24837. New Orleans, LA, USA: Curran Associates.
  70. Wu, Q.; Bansal, G.; Zhang, J.; Wu, Y.; Li, B.; Zhu, E.; Jiang, L.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, S.; Liu, J.; Awadallah, A. H.; White, R. W.; Burger, D.; and Wang, C. 2024. AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversation. In Proceedings of the First Conference on Language Modeling , COLM '24. Philadelphia, PA, USA: OpenReview.
  71. Wu, T.; Jiang, E.; Donsbach, A.; Gray, J.; Molina, A.; Terry, M.; and Cai, C. J. 2022. PromptChainer: Chaining Large Language Model Prompts through Visual Programming. In Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , CHI EA '22, 359:1-359:10. New Orleans, LA, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. ISBN 9781450391566.
  72. Xi, Z.; Chen, W.; Guo, X.; He, W.; Ding, Y.; Hong, B.; Zhang, M.; Wang, J.; Jin, S.; Zhou, E.; Zheng, R.; Fan, X.; Wang, X.; Xiong, L.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, W.; Jiang, C.; Zou, Y.; Liu, X.; Yin, Z.; Dou, S.; Weng, R.; Qin, W.; Yongyan Zheng, Y.; Qiu, X.; Huang, X.; Zhang, Q.; and Gui, T. 2025. The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Survey. Science China Information Sciences , 68(2): 121101.
  73. Xie, Q.; Wang, Z.; Feng, Y.; and Xia, R. 2024. Ask Again, Then Fail: Large Language Models' Vacillations in Judgment. In Ku, L.-W.; Martins, A.; and Srikumar, V., eds., Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) , ACL '24, 10709-10745. Bangkok, Thailand: Association for Computational Linguistics.
  74. Xu, Z.; Sanghi, U.; and Kankanhalli, M. 2025. Bullying the Machine: How Personas Increase LLM Vulnerability. arXiv:2505.12692. · arXiv
  75. Yang, A.; Li, A.; Yang, B.; Zhang, B.; Hui, B.; Zheng, B.; Yu, B.; Gao, C.; Huang, C.; Lv, C.; et al. 2025. Qwen3 Technical Report. arXiv:2505.09388. · arXiv
  76. Yang, A.; Yang, B.; Hui, B.; Zheng, B.; Yu, B.; Zhou, C.; Li, C.; Li, C.; Liu, D.; Huang, F.; et al. 2024. Qwen2 Technical Report. arXiv:2407.10671. · arXiv
  77. Yao, S.; Zhao, J.; Yu, D.; Du, N.; Shafran, I.; Narasimhan, K.; and Cao, Y. 2023. ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations , ICLR '23. Kigali, Rwanda: OpenReview.
  78. Zamfirescu-Pereira, J.; Wong, R. Y.; Hartmann, B.; and Yang, Q. 2023. Why Johnny Can't Prompt: How Non-AI Experts Try (and Fail) to Design LLM Prompts. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , CHI '23, 437:1-437:21. Hamburg, Germany: Association for Computing Machinery. ISBN 9781450394215.
  79. Zhang, Z.; Bai, F.; Gao, J.; and Yang, Y. 2024. ValueDCG: Measuring Comprehensive Human Value Understanding Ability of Language Models. arXiv:2310.00378. · arXiv
  80. Zhao, Q.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Jin, Y.; Zhu, K.; Chen, H.; and Xie, X. 2024. CompeteAI: Understanding the Competition Dynamics of Large Language Model-Based Agents. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Agentic Markets , 2526:12526:16. Vienna, Austria: JMLR.org.
  81. Zhou, E.; Zheng, R.; Xi, Z.; Gao, S.; Fan, X.; Fei, Z.; Ye, J.; Gui, T.; Zhang, Q.; and Huang, X. 2023. RealBehavior: A Framework for Faithfully Characterizing Foundation Models' Human-Like Behavior Mechanisms. In Bouamor, H.; Pino, J.; and Bali, K., eds., Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023 , 1026210274. Singapore: Association for Computational Linguistics.
  82. Zhuge, M.; Liu, H.; Faccio, F.; Ashley, D. R.; Csord´ as, R.; Gopalakrishnan, A.; Hamdi, A.; Hammoud, H. A. A. K.; Herrmann, V.; Irie, K.; et al. 2025. Mindstorms in Natural Language-Based Societies of Mind. Computational Visual Media , 11(1): 29-81.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Besta, M., Chandran, S., Gerstenberger, R., Lindner, M., Chrapek, M., Martschat, S. H., Ghandi, T., Iff, P., Niewiadomski, H., Nyczyk, P., Müller, J., & Hoefler, T.
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2025
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2509.04343
arXiv
2509.04343
OpenAlex
W7080125581
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Psychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Keywords
LLM agents, Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, prompt engineering, behavioral biases, emotional expressiveness, analytical thinking, multi-agent communication, self-reflection, cooperation, Big Five personality traits, HEXACO, Enneagram, narrative generation, game-theoretic reasoning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review