Machine marketing: rethinking the customer in the age of generative AI
Open accessAbstract
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is transforming consumer decision-making by enabling large language models to function as collaborative AI assistants or autonomous AI agents. These developments signal a shift from AI as a passive tool to an active market participant, ultimately evolving into AI customers that navigate offers independently, interact with firms directly, and shape purchase decision processes. This research note examines the implications of AI customers for marketing practice and scholarship, arguing that their growing role necessitates the emergence of machine marketing as a new subdiscipline dedicated to understanding, predicting, and shaping the behavior of AI-based decision-makers.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This research note argues that as large language model–based AI assistants and AI agents take over search, evaluation, and even purchase execution, they become "AI customers" — a distinct market actor that firms must market to directly. The authors propose "machine marketing" as a new marketing subdiscipline dedicated to understanding, predicting, and influencing the behavior of these AI-based decision-makers.
Key findings
- AI systems are shifting from passive tools to active market participants: AI assistants collaborate with consumers under continuous human guidance, while AI agents autonomously decompose goals, compare alternatives, and execute transactions, so both become "AI customers" spanning a continuum of autonomy.
- An industry survey cited by the authors (Oteh et al. 2026b) reports that 85% of respondents are open to integrating AI systems into their purchase journey, and 32% are open to completely delegating decision-making to AI systems.
- Because AI customers are not "automated humans" and follow their own utility patterns, established marketing mechanisms (source credibility, message framing, affective appeals, scarcity/popularity cues) may not operate the same way when the decision-maker is algorithmic.
- The authors position machine marketing as extending SEO into generative engine optimization (GEO) and generative engine advertising (GEA), and as reframing marketing from human-tailored value propositions to machine-readable offerings and from human-facing persuasion to AI-facing influence.
Methods
- Conceptual research note (no empirical study); the authors state that "no datasets were generated or analyzed."
- The argument is built by synthesizing prior literature on LLM capabilities (RAG, memory, tool use), human-AI delegation, machine psychology, and silicon samples/LLM-based digital twins.
- Proposes a conceptual framework placing machine marketing across all customer journey stages (Fig. 2) and an overview of market actors — human customers, AI systems, firms (Fig. 1).
Limitations
- Stated: the paper reports no data; data sharing is not applicable because no datasets were generated or analyzed.
- Evident from the text: the central claims are conceptual and untested — the authors repeatedly frame questions as future research (e.g., which decisions consumers will delegate, whether AI customers respond to persuasive cues like humans) rather than answering them.
- Evident from the text: the only quantitative evidence cited (85%/32%) comes from a third-party industry survey (Oteh et al. 2026b), not from the authors' own data collection.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
25 of 48 cited sources checked · 11 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationcitation
AI customers introduce novel dynamics of trust, agency attribution, and influence that may diverge from those observed in human-to-human persuasion.
“This development also introduces novel dynamics of trust, agency attribution, and influence that may diverge from those observed in human-to-human persuasion (see also Mortati and Mundstock Freitas 2026).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Mortati and Mundstock Freitas 2026 source
The Human Provider to AI User section (pp. 6, 8) describes AI customers making autonomous decisions and says interactions with them require different protocols from human interactions. This supports a change in agency and interaction dynamics, but the paper does not address agency attribution or compare trust and persuasive influence with human-to-human persuasion. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationcitation
Understanding similarities and differences in human and agentic information processing is critical for explaining how AI customers make decisions and whether these decisions parallel human decision-making.
“Understanding these similarities as well as differences in human and agentic information processing is critical for explaining how AI customers make decisions and whether these decisions parallel human decision-making (Sarstedt et al. 2026).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Sarstedt et al. 2026 source
The Guidelines for generating valid silicon samples in marketing research (page not provided) say that differences between LLMs and humans may limit how well synthetic respondents capture human decision-making, making validation against human data important. This supports examining whether AI-generated responses parallel human responses, but the paper addresses LLMs as research respondents, not how autonomous AI customers make decisions. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
GEO encourages building a brand's presence in widely referenced, machine-readable sources such as community platforms or public knowledge bases because these sources are often used by AI models when generating answers.
“GEO also encourages building a brand's presence in widely referenced, machinereadable sources, such as community platforms or public knowledge bases (e.g., Reddit and Wikipedia), because these sources are often used by AI models when generating answers (Aggarwal et al. 2024;Chen et al. 2025;Nestaas et al. 2024).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites Aggarwal et al. 2024 source
The Introduction (page not provided) says generative engines use retrieved web sources to generate answers and presents GEO as a way to improve the visibility of creators’ website content. It does not recommend building a brand presence on community platforms or public knowledge bases, or identify Reddit, Wikipedia, or machine-readability as reasons to do so. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Chen et al. 2025 source
Section 5.3 recommends building a brand’s presence in authoritative sources that AI engines cite, and section 4.4 calls for machine-readable content. The Comparative Observations identify Wikipedia as a source used by ChatGPT, but say ChatGPT almost entirely excludes social platforms such as Reddit; the paper does not support treating community platforms generally as sources AI models often use. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Nestaas et al. 2024 source
The paper’s “LLM Search Engine Details” section (page unavailable) says LLM search engines retrieve parts of web pages, and §5.4 shows that content on a highly ranked GitHub page affected generated answers. It does not recommend building a brand presence on community platforms or public knowledge bases, or establish that Reddit and Wikipedia are often used for this purpose. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Contextual factors such as task complexity and initiation mode of delegation shape whether consumers accept or resist autonomous AI decision-making.
“Research also suggests that contextual factors, such as task complexity and initiation mode of delegation, shape whether consumers accept or resist autonomous AI decision-making (Adam et al. 2024;Spitzer et al. 2025).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Adam et al. 2024 source
- cites Spitzer et al. 2025 source
Section 5.3 examines whether perceived task difficulty and contextual information influence decisions to delegate to AI, and Section 6.1 reports that different kinds of contextual information change delegation behavior. The paper studies human delegation in workplace-oriented collaboration, not consumer acceptance or resistance, and the retrieved passages do not address who initiates delegation. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationcitation
Over time, human consumers may develop increasingly close relationships with their AI systems, resulting in reciprocal influence and preference co-evolution.
“Over time, human consumers may develop increasingly close relationships with their AI systems, resulting in reciprocal influence and preference co-evolution (Pedreschi et al. 2025).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Pedreschi et al. 2025 source
The abstract (p. 1) describes continuous mutual influence: users’ choices train AI models, which then shape users’ preferences. The feedback-loop description (p. 3) also supports an ongoing reciprocal process. Neither passage says consumers develop increasingly close relationships with their AI systems, so that part of the claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Consumers may adjust their preferences and behaviors in response to the alternatives and information provided by AI systems, a phenomenon already observed in interactions with recommender systems.
“In turn, consumers may adjust their preferences and behaviors in response to the alternatives and information provided by AI systems-a phenomenon already observed in interactions with recommender systems (Dean and Morgenstern 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Dean and Morgenstern 2022 source
- Interpretationcitation
Machine marketing will be particularly prominent in the early stages of the customer journey through generative engine optimization and generative engine advertising.
“Machine marketing will be particularly prominent in the early stages of the customer journey through generative engine optimization (GEO, Aggarwal et al. 2024) and the emerging practice of generative engine advertising (GEA).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Aggarwal et al. 2024 source
- Interpretationcitation
AI systems increasingly move beyond supporting consumer decisions to actively participating in marketplace exchanges on behalf of consumers.
“As a result, AI systems increasingly move beyond supporting consumer decisions to actively participating in marketplace exchanges on behalf of consumers (Sapkota et al. 2026).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Sapkota et al. 2026 source
Section 4.0.1 (page unavailable) describes AI agents recommending products and taking customer-service actions such as order tracking and return initiation. That supports a move beyond decision support in commerce, but the examples are retailer-operated; the copy does not establish agents participating in marketplace exchanges on behalf of consumers. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
LLMs are susceptible to various types of biases regarding judgment, information processing, response behavior, and decision-making heuristics.
“Emerging evidence suggests that LLMs are susceptible to various types of biases regarding judgment (e.g., probability weighting; Hintze et al. 2025), information processing (e.g., framing effects; Binz and Schulz 2023), and response behavior (e.g., social desirability bias; Salecha et al. 2024), as well as decision-making heuristics (e.g., confirmation bias; Macmillan-Scott and Musolesi 2024).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Research in machine psychology suggests that human and AI decision-making can differ considerably.
“At the same time, research in machine psychology, a nascent foundational interdisciplinary field that seeks to explain how AI systems process information and make decisions, suggests that human and AI decision-making can differ considerably (Hagendorff 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hagendorff 2023 source
- Interpretationnone given
AI customers continuously learn from user feedback and interaction histories, enabling them to refine recommendations and adapt their decision-making processes.
“AI customers continuously learn from user feedback and interaction histories, enabling them to refine recommendations and adapt their decision-making processes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Explaining, predicting, and influencing the behavior of AI customers will become a major competitive advantage for companies.
“These figures underscore that explaining, predicting, and influencing the behavior of AI customers will become a major competitive advantage for companies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
GEO directly influences which products and services reach consumers' attention and enter their consideration set.
“GEO directly influences which products and services reach consumers' attention and enter their consideration set.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Even when humans retain the final decision authority, discovery-related activities can substantially shape the formation of demand and purchase outcomes.
“Even when humans retain the final decision authority, these discovery-related activities can substantially shape the formation of demand and purchase outcomes (Oteh et al. 2026a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Oteh et al. 2026a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
Machine marketing will emerge as a new field dedicated to understanding, predicting, and influencing the behavior of AI customers.
“Machine marketing will emerge as a new field dedicated to understanding, predicting, and influencing the behavior of AI customers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
In the future, companies will need to market not only to humans but also to AI customers.
“In the future, companies will not only need to market to humans, but also to AI customers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Initial research has started to examine how AI agent decision-making is influenced by persuasive marketing cues, such as scarcity appeals, top row positioning, or strike-through pricing.
“Initial research touching upon this domain has started to examine how AI agent decision-making is influenced by persuasive marketing cues, such as scarcity appeals, top row positioning, or strike-through pricing (Allouah et al. 2025;Sabbah and Acar 2026).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
AI assistants and AI agents combine LLM-based reasoning with planning, memory, and action capabilities.
“Two prominent examples are AI assistants and AI agents, which combine LLM-based reasoning with planning, memory, and action capabilities (Xi et al. 2025).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Xi et al. 2025
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The correspondence between LLM-based data generation and AI customers may facilitate generalizations from silicon samples and digital twins to AI customers.
“Since LLM-based data generation relies on a similar computational architecture as AI customers, this correspondence may facilitate generalizations from silicon samples and digital twins to AI customers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: LLM-based data generation relies on a similar computational architecture as AI customers.
- Interpretationreasoning
AI systems may increasingly function as intermediaries between firms and consumers.
“For marketers, a key implication of these latest developments is that AI systems may increasingly function as intermediaries between firms and consumers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
AI customers may struggle to balance consumers' immediate preferences with their long-term goals, creating new challenges for system design and marketing practice.
“Similarly, AI customers may struggle to balance consumers' immediate preferences with their long-term goals, creating new challenges for both system design and marketing practice (Li et al. 2025).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Li et al. 2025
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
AI customers are equally likely to emerge in post-purchase stages, where they may initiate and manage service interactions, submit feedback, or handle repayment and return requests.
“At the same time, AI customers are equally likely to emerge in post-purchase stages, where they may initiate and manage service interactions, submit feedback, or handle repayment and return requests (e.g., Fürst et al. 2025).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fürst et al. 2025 source
- Interpretationreasoning
AI customers are not replacements for human cognition or labor, but extensions of it.
“This hybrid mode of operation underscores the role of AI customers not as replacements for human cognition or labor, but as extensions of it.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
AI customers' actions can be analyzed through psychological concepts such as motivation, learning, social interaction, and persuasion.
“As AI customers learn from feedback, adapt to user preferences, and coordinate with humans and other machines, their actions can be analyzed through psychological concepts such as motivation, learning, social interaction, and persuasion (Hutson 2024).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hutson 2024 source
- Interpretationcitation
AI customers may emerge especially during pre-purchase stages, where they can search for information, screen alternatives, and narrow consumers' consideration sets.
“This implies that AI customers may emerge especially during pre-purchase stages, where they can search for information, screen alternatives, and narrow consumers' consideration sets (Hosanagar 2026).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hosanagar 2026
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Rests on an assumption: AI customers do not experience fatigue, cognitive overload, or diminishing attention when processing large or complex amounts of information.
- Rests on an assumption: AI customers can efficiently identify, compare, and recommend relevant products.
- Premisecitation
Individuals may form emotionally meaningful relationships with AI systems, as illustrated by the popularity of applications such as Replika.
“In some cases, individuals may even form emotionally meaningful relationships with AI systems, as illustrated by the popularity of applications such as Replika (Possati 2022).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Possati 2022 source
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 46
- May combine two claims. 29
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLLMs generate outputs by predicting likely token sequences based on patterns learned from large-scale training data.
“At the core of these systems are large language models (LLMs), which generate outputs by predicting likely token sequences based on patterns learned from large-scale training data (Brown et al. 2020;Radford et al. 2018;Vaswani et al. 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites Brown et al. 2020 source
- cites Radford et al. 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Vaswani et al. 2017 source
Section 3 (p. 2) describes the Transformer decoder generating symbols one at a time from previously generated symbols, and Section 3.4 (p. 5) describes predicted next-token probabilities. Section 5.1 (p. 7) reports training on millions of sentence pairs. The paper establishes these points for its Transformer sequence-transduction models, but does not make the broader claim about LLMs as a class. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRecent literature in marketing research has largely focused on how consumers interact with AI systems and how these AI systems change customer journeys and referrals.
“Recent literature in marketing research has largely focused on how consumers interact with AI systems and how these AI systems change customer journeys and referrals (e.g., Aggarwal et al. 2024;Blut et al. 2024;Gelbrich et al. 2025;Liu et al. 2024).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites Aggarwal et al. 2024 source
The section “A Conversational Generative Engine” describes users interacting with an AI-powered search system through queries and follow-ups. But the paper focuses on improving website visibility in generative-engine responses; it does not establish that marketing research has largely focused on consumer interactions, or examine changes to customer journeys and referrals. The indexed passages provide no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Blut et al. 2024 source
- cites Gelbrich et al. 2025 source
The Data Collection section describes a review of marketing and related research on how customers respond to robots, chatbots, algorithms, and other automated agents compared with human agents. That supports the consumer-interaction part of the claim, but the passages do not establish that marketing research has largely focused on this topic or address changes to customer journeys and referrals; searches for those terms found no relevant passage. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRecent advances in GenAI have substantially expanded the capabilities of AI systems, enabling increasingly autonomous forms of human-AI interaction.
“Recent advances in GenAI have substantially expanded the capabilities of AI systems, enabling increasingly autonomous forms of human-AI interaction (Mienye et al. 2025).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Mienye et al. 2025 source
Section 2 (Related works; page unavailable) describes expanded LLM capabilities, including content generation and automated customer service. Section 8.3 (Ethical risk tiers; page unavailable) also discusses models used in autonomous systems. Neither passage establishes the claimed progression toward increasingly autonomous human–AI interaction. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationGEO aims to increase the likelihood that a firm's products, services, or content are retrieved, cited, and incorporated into AI-generated responses.
“Analogous to search engine optimization (SEO), GEO aims to increase the likelihood that a firm's products, services, or content are retrieved, cited, and incorporated into AI-generated responses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Aggarwal et al. 2024 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationResearchers have discussed deliberately implementing human-like cognitive biases in AI systems to more closely mirror human decision-making.
“Researchers have even discussed deliberately implementing human-like cognitive biases in AI systems to more closely mirror human decision-making (Besta et al. 2025;Hagendorff and Fabi 2023).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Besta et al. 2025 source
The Introduction (p. 1) says the authors deliberately prime AI agents with MBTI personalities and find behavioral biases aligned with those profiles. Section 4.3 (p. 7) reports differences in the agents’ strategic decisions that the authors relate to psychological traits. The paper does not describe deliberately implementing human cognitive biases specifically to mirror human decision-making; its intervention is personality priming. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Hagendorff and Fabi 2023 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAssessing the overlap between silicon and human samples is a common practice in current silicon sampling research.
“instead of assessing the overlap between silicon and human samples, which is a common practice in current silicon sampling research (Gao et al. 2025;Imschloss et al. 2025;Loru et al. 2025;Sarstedt et al. 2024)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationWhile LLMs sometimes mimic parameters of human information processing and behavior, this is not always the case.
“However, while LLMs sometimes mimic parameters of human information processing and behavior, this is not always the case (e.g., Kuric et al. 2026;Sarstedt et al. 2024).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTool-use capabilities enable LLMs to interact with external software systems, databases, search engines, and web services through APIs.
“In addition, tool-use capabilities enable LLMs to interact with external software systems, databases, search engines, and web services through APIs (Wang et al. 2024).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Wang et al. 2024 source
The Action goal section describes LLM-based agents using external APIs, including RESTful web services and software tools. It also describes querying databases with SQL and extracting content from web pages, but does not establish that database or search-engine access occurs through APIs. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAI systems are shifting from passive tools to active market participants, evolving into AI customers that navigate offers independently, interact with firms directly, and shape purchase decision processes.
“These developments signal a shift from AI as a passive tool to an active market participant, ultimately evolving into AI customers that navigate offers independently, interact with firms directly, and shape purchase decision processes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenAI systems now transcend simple information retrieval and delivery to support users across the entire consumer journey.
“AI systems now transcend simple information retrieval and delivery to support users across the entire consumer journey.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenGenerative artificial intelligence is transforming consumer decision-making by enabling large language models to function as collaborative AI assistants or autonomous AI agents.
“Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is transforming consumer decision-making by enabling large language models to function as collaborative AI assistants or autonomous AI agents.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAs consumers increasingly delegate decisions to AI assistants and AI agents, these systems become AI customers that marketers must recognize as part of their target audience and that marketing scholars must incorporate into future market and consumer research.
“As consumers increasingly delegate decisions to AI assistants and AI agents, these systems become AI customers that marketers must recognize as part of their target audience and that marketing scholars must incorporate into future market and consumer research.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenAI agents can independently perform delegated tasks and execute actions within predefined constraints.
“While AI assistants act as active collaborators in consumers' decision processes, AI agents can independently perform delegated tasks and execute actions within predefined constraints.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThe growing role of AI customers necessitates machine marketing as a new subdiscipline dedicated to understanding, predicting, and shaping the behavior of AI-based decision-makers.
“This research note examines the implications of AI customers for marketing practice and scholarship, arguing that their growing role necessitates the emergence of machine marketing as a new subdiscipline dedicated to understanding, predicting, and shaping the behavior of AI-based decision-makers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenAI assistants act as active collaborators in consumers' decision processes.
“While AI assistants act as active collaborators in consumers' decision processes, AI agents can independently perform delegated tasks and execute actions within predefined constraints.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenFor both AI assistants and AI agents, consumers delegate part of their decision authority to an AI system.
“For both AI assistants and AI agents, consumers delegate part of their decision authority to an AI system, such as selecting an information source (e.g., brand-owned websites, comparison websites, product tests), choosing a retailer, or completing the checkout process.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenAs AI customers operate through AI-mediated evaluation and delegated decision-making, they interpret product information, compare alternatives, infer consumer preferences, and potentially select products on consumers' behalf.
“As AI customers operate through AI-mediated evaluation and delegated decision-making, they interpret product information, compare alternatives, infer consumer preferences, and potentially select products on consumers' behalf.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningAs AI systems increasingly evaluate, recommend, select, and transact on consumers' behalf, they evolve from decision-support technologies into AI customers that actively participate in marketplace exchanges.
“As AI systems increasingly evaluate, recommend, select, and transact on consumers' behalf, they evolve from decision-support technologies into AI customers that actively participate in marketplace exchanges (Fig. 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenAI customers act as intermediaries between the human consumer and the firm throughout the customer journey, from initial information search and preference building over check-out to post-purchase interactions such as refund negotiations.
“AI customers act as intermediaries between the human consumer and the firm throughout the customer journey, from initial information search and preference building over check-out to post-purchase interactions such as refund negotiations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenAI customers blur the boundaries between tools and collaborators: they act (semi-)autonomously within bounded parameters but typically remain contingent on human intention and oversight.
“They blur the boundaries between tools and collaborators: they act (semi-)autonomously within bounded parameters but typically remain contingent on human intention and oversight.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningAI agents autonomously pursue user-defined goals, decompose complex objectives into subtasks, gather and evaluate information from multiple sources, iteratively refine decisions, and execute actions with minimal or no human intervention.
“AI agents extend these capabilities by autonomously pursuing user-defined goals.They can decompose complex objectives into subtasks, gather and evaluate information from multiple sources, iteratively refine decisions, and execute actions with minimal or no human intervention.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenPurchases involving AI customers require firms to close sales and to initiate and manage delivery and payment processes in collaboration with AI interfaces.
“Purchases involving AI customers require firms to close sales, as well as initiate and manage delivery and payment processes in collaboration with AI interfaces.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningBefore the final purchase, AI customers will likely play a role in price adjustments.
“Before the final purchase, AI customers will likely play a role in price adjustments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThe shift from SEO to GEO involves consumers moving from generic search terms to more nuanced prompts.
“the shift from SEO to GEO comes with changes in consumers' search strategy in that they move from generic search terms as in the search engine case (e.g.,”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIdentifying preference structures may be relatively straightforward for search goods but becomes more challenging for experience and credence goods, where consumers rely on external cues such as sensory experiences to evaluate quality.
“While identifying preference structures may be relatively straightforward for search goods (e.g., selecting a mobile phone contract with the best value for money), it becomes more challenging for experience and credence goods, where consumers rely on external cues such as sensory experiences to evaluate quality (e.g., Weathers et al. 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Weathers et al. 2007 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA recent industry survey indicates that 85% of respondents are open to integrating AI systems into their purchase journey, with 32% open to completely delegating decision-making to AI systems.
“A recent industry survey by Oteh et al. (2026b) indicates that 85% of respondents are open to integrating AI systems into their purchase journey, with 32% of respondents being open to completely delegating decision-making to AI systems (i.e., let AI choose what to buy).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Oteh et al. 2026b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningMachine marketing will require understanding how AI customers process prompts, represent preferences, and make decisions.
“Just as SEO required understanding how search engines interpreted and ranked content, machine marketing will require understanding how AI customers process prompts, represent preferences, and make decisions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningMachine marketing considers AI customers as a separate target group that notably differs from human customers and thus requires uniquely focused marketing campaigns and tailored marketing strategies.
“That is, machine marketing considers AI customers as a separate target group that notably differs from human customers and thus requires uniquely focused marketing campaigns and tailored marketing strategies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenAs consumers and AI systems increasingly interact, AI customers will become more sensitive to human behavior, just as human consumers may adapt their behaviors considering AI-based recommendations and purchase decisions.
“As consumers and AI systems will increasingly interact, AI customers will become more sensitive to human behavior, just as human consumers may adapt their behaviors considering AI-based recommendations and purchase decisions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenSilicon samples may offer insights into understanding AI customers by mimicking their behavior, even if they do not mimic human behavior perfectly in all its facets.
“Silicon samples may offer insights into this regard by mimicking the behavior of AI customers, even if they do not mimic human behavior perfectly in all its facets.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThis development will reshape marketing strategies, metrics, and ethics in the digital marketplace.
“This development will reshape marketing strategies, metrics, and ethics in the digital marketplace.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenAI assistants support consumers throughout the decision process but require continuous human interaction, guidance, and confirmation.
“AI assistants support consumers throughout the decision process but require continuous human interaction, guidance, and confirmation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenAlthough AI customers will often operate as decision-support systems, consumers may increasingly delegate decision tasks to them.
“Although AI customers will often operate as decision-support systems, consumers may increasingly delegate decision tasks to them.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenGEA is the paid counterpart to GEO, enabling firms to promote products or services through sponsored placements embedded in AI-generated responses or recommendations.
“By contrast, GEA is the paid counterpart to GEO, enabling firms to promote products or services through sponsored placements embedded in AIgenerated responses or recommendations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenWith increased decision authority, AI customers act with higher autonomy and can initiate actions or complete transactions within prespecified boundaries without human involvement.
“With increased decision authority, AI customers act with higher autonomy and can initiate actions or complete transactions within prespecified boundaries without human involvement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenConsumers may become dependent on AI-generated recommendations and delegate an expanding range of decisions.
“Conversely, consumers may become dependent on AI-generated recommendations and delegate an expanding range of decisions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenAs relationships deepen, AI customers may increasingly mirror aspects of their human counterpart's personality, values, and decision-making.
“As these relationships deepen, AI customers may increasingly mirror aspects of their human counterpart's personality, values, and decision-making.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenHuman customers would rely on their AI assistants and AI agents to search for favorable offers, negotiate lower prices, and exploit discounts.
“human customers would rely on their AI assistants and AI agents to search for favorable offers, negotiate lower prices, and exploit discounts”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenMany consumers are hesitant to engage in sales failure recoveries and might therefore be willing to delegate related tasks, such as filing complaints or negotiating solutions, to AI agents.
“many consumers are hesitant to engage in sales failure recoveries and might therefore be willing to delegate related tasks, such as filing complaints or negotiating solutions, to AI agents.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenAI assistants and AI agents increasingly act as intermediaries between firms and consumers.
“Today, a similar shift is underway as AI assistants and AI agents increasingly act as intermediaries between firms and consumers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenMaking a purchase decision involving AI customers will be a dyadic process that may involve discussing choice options with an AI assistant.
“Making a purchase decision will then be a dyadic process that may involve discussing choice options with an AI assistant.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
PremisecitationMachine psychology would examine how AI customers perceive, decide, act, and interact in ways that resemble human behavior, rather than interpreting the internal representations and design components of the neural networks underlying LLMs.
“Researchers have proposed that such an endeavor necessitates the establishment of an academic area of machine psychology (Hagendorff, 2023), with important implications for the marketing discipline.”
- Also stated in: § Studying the behavior of AI customers · hedged
“Rather than interpreting the internal representations and design components of the neural networks that underly LLMs, machine psychology would examine how AI customers perceive, decide, act, and interact in ways that resemble human behavior.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hagendorff, 2023 source
- Also stated in: § Studying the behavior of AI customers · hedged
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThrough retrieval-augmented generation, LLMs can access and incorporate external information beyond their training data.
“Through retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), for example, LLMs can access and incorporate external information beyond their training data (Lewis et al. 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lewis et al. 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenFirms would integrate AI customers into their dynamic pricing systems in an effort to capitalize on a consumer's willingness to pay.
“firms would integrate these AI customers into their dynamic pricing systems in an effort to capitalize on a consumer's willingness to pay.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAI systems filter, recommend, and even decide on products and services, effectively becoming new gatekeepers of market access.
“These systems filter, recommend, and even decide on products and services, effectively becoming new gatekeepers of market access.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenAI customers' role extends beyond executing delegated tasks and fundamentally reshapes how consumers make decisions, the degree of autonomy they grant AI systems, and how human and AI preferences evolve through repeated interactions.
“Their role extends beyond executing delegated tasks and fundamentally reshapes how consumers make decisions, the degree of autonomy they grant AI systems, and how human and AI preferences evolve through repeated interactions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenIn the post-sales stage, machine marketing affects how consumers use products, engage in after-sales services, provide feedback, and ultimately dispose of products.
“In the post-sales stage, machine marketing affects how consumers use products, engage in after-sales services, provide feedback, and ultimately dispose of products.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenAcross stages of the customer journey, AI customers must develop representations of their human counterpart's preferences, goals, and constraints in order to provide useful recommendations and make appropriate decisions.
“Across stages of the customer journey, AI customers must develop representations of their human counterpart's preferences, goals, and constraints in order to provide useful recommendations and make appropriate decisions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: AI customers can develop representations of their human counterpart's preferences, goals, and constraints.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe emergence of machine marketing closely parallels the rise of SEO and SEA several decades ago.
“The emergence of machine marketing closely parallels the rise of SEO and SEA several decades ago.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationConsumers' willingness to delegate choice tasks to AI systems depends on perceived autonomy and control; reduced perceived decision autonomy lowers the adoption likelihood of recommender systems.
“Specifically, reduced perceived decision autonomy lowers the adoption likelihood of recommender systems (Ahmad Husairi and Rossi 2024).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ahmad Husairi and Rossi 2024
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningAI customers are market actors that emerge through the integration of AI systems into consumer decision-making processes and span a continuum from supportive AI assistants to more autonomous AI agents.
“AI customers thus constitute market actors that emerge through the integration of AI systems into consumer decision-making processes and span a continuum from supportive AI assistants to more autonomous AI agents.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationConsumers may lack the capacity, motivation, or time to evaluate complex information or the vast number of available options and may therefore instruct an AI system to identify a specific product or recommend the best option within a given price range.
“For example, consumers may lack the capacity, motivation, or time to evaluate complex information or the vast number of available options (Chernev et al. 2015;Malhotra 1982;Shahid et al. 2025) and may therefore instruct an AI system to identify a specific product or recommend the best option within a given price range.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningAI customers will become an important target for companies to market their products and services.
“AI customers will become an important target for companies to market their products and services.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe final purchase decision will be heavily influenced by AI-human collaboration, making machine marketing a counterpart of traditional marketing that targets human consumers.
“The final decision, therefore, will be heavily influenced by this AI-human-collaboration, making machine marketing a counterpart of traditional marketing that targets human consumers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe machine psychology perspective offers machine marketing frameworks that help anticipate how AI customers behave in complex environments, how consumers interpret and respond to them, and how human-AI relationships develop over time.
“The machine psychology perspective thereby offers machine marketing with frameworks that help anticipate how AI customers behave in complex environments, how consumers interpret and respond to them, and how human-AI relationships develop over time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThis transition signals a broader move from marketing to humans toward marketing through and to machines.
“This transition signals a broader move from marketing to humans toward marketing through and to machines.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenMachine marketing shifts attention from human-tailored value propositions to machine-readable offerings, from human-facing persuasion to AI-facing influence, and from direct consumer demand to demand that is filtered, translated, or reshaped by AI systems.
“Specifically, machine marketing shifts attention from human-tailored value propositions to machine-readable offerings, from human-facing persuasion to AI-facing influence, and from direct consumer demand to demand that is filtered, translated, or reshaped by AI systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
AI customers do not experience fatigue, cognitive overload, or diminishing attention when processing large or complex amounts of information.
“Unlike human consumers, AI customers would not experience fatigue, cognitive overload, or diminishing attention when processing large or complex amounts of information.”
The paper relies on this without support.
AI customers can efficiently identify, compare, and recommend relevant products.
“They can efficiently identify, compare, and recommend relevant products, which human consumers may subsequently evaluate and refine by providing feedback on suggested alternatives.”
The paper relies on this without support.
AI customers can develop representations of their human counterpart's preferences, goals, and constraints.
“Across stages of the customer journey, AI customers must develop representations of their human counterpart's preferences, goals, and constraints in order to provide useful recommendations and make appropriate decisions.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Companies have already responded to the shift toward machine marketing by moving from SEO to GEO and by allowing popular AI systems such as ChatGPT to access and interact with their online stores.
“Companies have already responded to this shift by moving from SEO to GEO and by allowing popular AI systems such as ChatGPT to access and interact with their online stores.”
The paper relies on this without support.
LLM-based data generation relies on a similar computational architecture as AI customers.
“Since LLM-based data generation relies on a similar computational architecture as AI customers, this correspondence may facilitate generalizations from silicon samples and digital twins to AI customers.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
OpenTable assistant is described as a qualitative-research tool
MinorThe introduction says OpenTable's AI assistant conducts interviews and moderates focus groups, citing Bilendi. The paper's OpenTable reference instead describes a restaurant-question concierge, while its Bilendi reference concerns qualitative research.
“Similarly, OpenTable's AI assistant, autonomously conducts personal interviews and moderates focus group discussions (Bilendi, 2025).”
“Weiß, E.-M. 2025. OpenTable: New concierge answers questions about restaurants.”
Cites
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404 · see citing works
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.14165 · Cited by 23,372 · see citing works
Understanding customer experience throughout the customer journey
Lemon, K. N., & Verhoef, P. C. (2016) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jm.15.0420 · Cited by 5,765 · see citing works
A survey on large language model based autonomous agents
Wang, L., Ma, C., Feng, X., Zhang, Z., Yang, H., Zhang, J., Chen, Z., Tang, J., Chen, X., Lin, Y., et al. (2024) · Frontiers of Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s11704-024-40231-1 · Cited by 1,941 · see citing works
Levin, I. P., & Gaeth, G. J. (1988) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209174 · Cited by 1,172 · see citing works
The rise and potential of large language model based agents: a survey
Xi, Z., Chen, W., Guo, X., He, W., Ding, Y., Hong, B., Zhang, M., Wang, J., Jin, S., Zhou, E., et al. (2025) · Science China Information Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11432-024-4222-0 · Cited by 970 · see citing works
Choice overload: A conceptual review and meta-analysis
Chernev, A., Böckenholt, U., & Goodman, J. (2015) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2014.08.002 · Cited by 858 · see citing works
Information Load and Consumer Decision Making
Malhotra, N. K. (1982) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208882 · Cited by 778 · see citing works
Using cognitive psychology to understand GPT-3
Binz, M., & Schulz, E. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2218523120 · Cited by 559 · see citing works
The Persuasive Effect of Source Credibility: Tests of Cognitive Response
Sternthal, B., Dholakia, R. R., & Leavitt, C. (1978) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208704 · Cited by 528 · see citing works
The effect of characteristics of source credibility on consumer behaviour: A meta-analysis
Ismagilova, E., Slade, E., Rana, N. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2020) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.01.005 · Cited by 504 · see citing works
Weathers, D., Sharma, S., & Wood, S. L. (2007) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2007.03.009 · Cited by 439 · see citing works
AI Agents vs. Agentic AI: A Conceptual taxonomy, applications and challenges
Sapkota, R., Roumeliotis, K. I., & Karkee, M. (2026) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2025.103599 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
Recommendation Systems with Purchase Data
Bodapati, A. V. (2008) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.45.1.77 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Rise of the machines: Delegating decisions to autonomous AI
Candrian, C., & Scherer, A. (2022) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107308 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Wu, L., & Lee, C. T. (2016) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2016.08.001 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Sarstedt, M., Adler, S. J., Rau, L., & Schmitt, B. (2024) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21982 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Self-citationPedreschi, D., Pappalardo, L., Ferragina, E., Baeza-Yates, R., Barabási, A.-L., Dignum, F., Dignum, V., Eliassi-Rad, T., Giannotti, F., Kertész, J., et al. (2025) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2024.104244 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
AI concierge in the customer journey: what is it and how can it add value to the customer?
Liu, S. Q., Vakeel, K. A., Smith, N. A., Alavipour, R. S., Wei, C., & Wirtz, J. (2024) · Journal of service management · doi:10.1108/josm-12-2023-0523 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Facilitating retail customers’ use of AI-based virtual assistants: A meta-analysis
Blut, M., Wünderlich, N. V., & Brock, C. (2024) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2024.04.001 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Trust models and theories in human–computer interaction: A systematic literature review
Gulati, S., McDonagh, J., Sousa, S., & Lamas, D. (2024) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100495 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Hagendorff, T., Dasgupta, I., Binz, M., Chan, S. C. Y., Lampinen, A., Wang, J. X., Akata, Z., & Schulz, E. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.13988 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Delegation of purchasing tasks to AI: The role of perceived choice and decision autonomy
Husairi, M. A., & Rossi, P. (2023) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2023.114166 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Psychoanalyzing artificial intelligence: the case of Replika
Possati, L. M. (2023) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-021-01379-7 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
GEO: Generative Engine Optimization
Aggarwal, P., Murahari, V., Rajpurohit, T., Kalyan, A., Narasimhan, K., & Deshpande, A. (2024) · Proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3637528.3671900 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Adam, M., Diebel, C., Goutier, M., & Benlian, A. (2024) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2024.114193 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
The simulation of judgment in LLMs
Loru, E., Nudo, J., Di Marco, N., Santirocchi, A., Atzeni, R., Cinelli, M., Cestari, V., Rossi-Arnaud, C., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2518443122 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
AI agents, agentic AI, and the future of sales
Gonzalez, G. R., Habel, J., & Hunter, G. K. (2025) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115799 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
(Ir)rationality and cognitive biases in large language models
Macmillan-Scott, O., & Musolesi, M. (2024) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.240255 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Large language models display human-like social desirability biases in Big Five personality surveys
Salecha, A., Ireland, M. E., Subrahmanya, S., Sedoc, J., Ungar, L. H., & Eichstaedt, J. C. (2024) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae533 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Take caution in using LLMs as human surrogates
Gao, Y., Lee, D., Burtch, G., & Fazelpour, S. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2501660122 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Large language models: an overview of foundational architectures, recent trends, and a new taxonomy
Mienye, I. D., Jere, N., Obaido, G., Ogunruku, O. O., Esenogho, E., & Modisane, C. (2025) · Discover Applied Sciences · doi:10.1007/s42452-025-07668-w · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Service recovery by AI or human agents: Do failure and strategy context matter?
Fürst, A., Trißler, L., Friedrich, R., & Wirtz, J. (2025) · Journal of Service Management · doi:10.1108/josm-04-2024-0190 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Toubia, O., Gui, G., Peng, T., Merlau, D. J., Li, A., & Chen, H. (2025) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.2025.0262 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Gelbrich, K., Roschk, H., Miederer, S., & Kerath, A. (2026) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/00222429251344139 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Competing for attention on digital platforms: The case of news outlets
Meyer, T., Kerkhof, A., Cennamo, C., & Kretschmer, T. (2024) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3600 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
AI in Service Design: A New Framework for Hybrid Human–AI Service Encounters
Mortati, M., & Viana Mundstock Freitas, G. (2026) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/10946705251344387 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
How does ChatGPT ‘think’? Psychology and neuroscience crack open AI large language models
Hutson, M. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-024-01314-y · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Preference Dynamics Under Personalized Recommendations
Dean, S., & Morgenstern, J. (2022) · Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation · doi:10.1145/3490486.3538346 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Why we need biased AI: How including cognitive biases can enhance AI systems
Hagendorff, T., & Fabi, S. (2024) · Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1080/0952813x.2023.2178517 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Human Delegation Behavior in Human-AI Collaboration: The Effect of Contextual Information
Spitzer, P., Holstein, J., Hemmer, P., Vössing, M., Kühl, N., Martin, D., & Satzger, G. (2025) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3710999 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Consumer confusion: A meta-analytic review
Shahid, S., Maseeh, H. I., Jebarajakirthy, C., Kumar Sharma, B., Saha, R., & Gupta, S. (2025) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115294 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Time is shrinking in the eye of AI: AI agents influence intertemporal choice
Li, Y. J., Lin, S., Gong, H., Xiang, W., & Janiszewski, C. A. (2025) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcpy.1455 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Using LLMs in sensory service research: initial insights and perspectives
Imschloß, M., Sarstedt, M., Adler, S. J., & Cheah, J. (2025) · Service Industries Journal · doi:10.1080/02642069.2025.2479723 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Self-citationAllouah, A., Besbes, O., Figueroa, J., Kanoria, Y., & Kumar, A. (2025) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5381574 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Generative Engine Optimization: How to Dominate AI Search
Chen, M., Wang, X., Chen, K., & Koudas, N. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.08919 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Synthetic Participants Generated by Large Language Models: A Systematic Literature Review
Kuric, E., Demcak, P., & Krajcovic, M. (2026) · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-9057643/v1 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Your Next Respondent Might Be an LLM: Guidelines for Using Silicon Samples in Marketing Research
Sarstedt, M., Adler, S. J., Rau, L., & Schmitt, B. (2026) · NIM Marketing Intelligence Review · doi:10.2478/nimmir-2026-0004 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationAdversarial Search Engine Optimization for Large Language Models
Nestaas, F., Debenedetti, E., & Tramèr, F. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.18382 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Nonlinear transformation of probabilities by large language models
Hintze, A., Bisht, C., Schossau, J., & Hertwig, R. (2025) · Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans · doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100227 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Psychologically Enhanced AI Agents
Besta, M., Chandran, S., Gerstenberger, R., Lindner, M., Chrapek, M., Martschat, S. H., Ghandi, T., Iff, P., Niewiadomski, H., Nyczyk, P., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.04343 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Marketing to Machines: How AI Shopping Agents Respond to Promotional Cues
Sabbah, J., & Acar, O. A. (2026) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6406639 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Human Delegation Behavior in Human-AI Collaboration: The Effect of Contextual Information
Spitzer, P., Holstein, J., Hemmer, P., Vössing, M., Kühl, N., Martin, D., & Satzger, G. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.04729
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Lewis, P., E. Perez, A. Piktus, F. Petroni, V. Karpukhin, N. Goyal, H. Küttler, M. Lewis, W.-t. Yih, T. Rocktäschel, S. Riedel, and D. Kiela. 2020. Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rach, M. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-9589-0.ch002
Yapay Zekâ Aracılı Alışverişte Pazarlamanın Dönüşümü: Tüketici Karar Sürecinden Marka Stratejilerine
Akdeniz, M. (2026) · Özgür Yayınları eBooks · doi:10.58830/ozgur.pub1494.c5967
Schöley, T., & Mergner, N. (2026) · Journal of Marketing Analytics · doi:10.1057/s41270-026-00556-1
- Authors
- Sarstedt, M., Adler, S. J., & Imschloss, M.
- Affiliations
- Babeș-Bolyai University (RO)
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
- FernUniversität in Hagen (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Adler, Susanne J.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing Analytics
- Published
- 2026-07-27
- ISSN
- 2050-3318 (ISSN-L)
- 2050-3326
- OpenAlex
- W7171446933
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3
- FWCI
- 10.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Marketing Analytics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Marketing and Advertising Strategies
- Keywords
- generative AI, large language models, autonomous AI agents, purchase decision, purchase decision process, marketing practice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-29.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-29.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review