Cited by 3AI in Service InteractionsDigital Marketing and Social MediaMarketing and Advertising Strategies

Machine marketing: rethinking the customer in the age of generative AI

Open access
Sarstedt, Marko, Adler, Susanne J., Imschloss, Monika·2026·Journal of Marketing Analytics

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is transforming consumer decision-making by enabling large language models to function as collaborative AI assistants or autonomous AI agents. These developments signal a shift from AI as a passive tool to an active market participant, ultimately evolving into AI customers that navigate offers independently, interact with firms directly, and shape purchase decision processes. This research note examines the implications of AI customers for marketing practice and scholarship, arguing that their growing role necessitates the emergence of machine marketing as a new subdiscipline dedicated to understanding, predicting, and shaping the behavior of AI-based decision-makers.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This research note argues that as large language model–based AI assistants and AI agents take over search, evaluation, and even purchase execution, they become "AI customers" — a distinct market actor that firms must market to directly. The authors propose "machine marketing" as a new marketing subdiscipline dedicated to understanding, predicting, and influencing the behavior of these AI-based decision-makers.

Key findings

  • AI systems are shifting from passive tools to active market participants: AI assistants collaborate with consumers under continuous human guidance, while AI agents autonomously decompose goals, compare alternatives, and execute transactions, so both become "AI customers" spanning a continuum of autonomy.
  • An industry survey cited by the authors (Oteh et al. 2026b) reports that 85% of respondents are open to integrating AI systems into their purchase journey, and 32% are open to completely delegating decision-making to AI systems.
  • Because AI customers are not "automated humans" and follow their own utility patterns, established marketing mechanisms (source credibility, message framing, affective appeals, scarcity/popularity cues) may not operate the same way when the decision-maker is algorithmic.
  • The authors position machine marketing as extending SEO into generative engine optimization (GEO) and generative engine advertising (GEA), and as reframing marketing from human-tailored value propositions to machine-readable offerings and from human-facing persuasion to AI-facing influence.

Methods

  • Conceptual research note (no empirical study); the authors state that "no datasets were generated or analyzed."
  • The argument is built by synthesizing prior literature on LLM capabilities (RAG, memory, tool use), human-AI delegation, machine psychology, and silicon samples/LLM-based digital twins.
  • Proposes a conceptual framework placing machine marketing across all customer journey stages (Fig. 2) and an overview of market actors — human customers, AI systems, firms (Fig. 1).

Limitations

  • Stated: the paper reports no data; data sharing is not applicable because no datasets were generated or analyzed.
  • Evident from the text: the central claims are conceptual and untested — the authors repeatedly frame questions as future research (e.g., which decisions consumers will delegate, whether AI customers respond to persuasive cues like humans) rather than answering them.
  • Evident from the text: the only quantitative evidence cited (85%/32%) comes from a third-party industry survey (Oteh et al. 2026b), not from the authors' own data collection.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/s41270-026-00521-y

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

25 of 48 cited sources checked · 11 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Interpretationcitation

    AI customers introduce novel dynamics of trust, agency attribution, and influence that may diverge from those observed in human-to-human persuasion.

    “This development also introduces novel dynamics of trust, agency attribution, and influence that may diverge from those observed in human-to-human persuasion (see also Mortati and Mundstock Freitas 2026).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mortati and Mundstock Freitas 2026 source

      The Human Provider to AI User section (pp. 6, 8) describes AI customers making autonomous decisions and says interactions with them require different protocols from human interactions. This supports a change in agency and interaction dynamics, but the paper does not address agency attribution or compare trust and persuasive influence with human-to-human persuasion. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Interpretationcitation

    Understanding similarities and differences in human and agentic information processing is critical for explaining how AI customers make decisions and whether these decisions parallel human decision-making.

    “Understanding these similarities as well as differences in human and agentic information processing is critical for explaining how AI customers make decisions and whether these decisions parallel human decision-making (Sarstedt et al. 2026).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sarstedt et al. 2026 source

      The Guidelines for generating valid silicon samples in marketing research (page not provided) say that differences between LLMs and humans may limit how well synthetic respondents capture human decision-making, making validation against human data important. This supports examining whether AI-generated responses parallel human responses, but the paper addresses LLMs as research respondents, not how autonomous AI customers make decisions. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    GEO encourages building a brand's presence in widely referenced, machine-readable sources such as community platforms or public knowledge bases because these sources are often used by AI models when generating answers.

    “GEO also encourages building a brand's presence in widely referenced, machinereadable sources, such as community platforms or public knowledge bases (e.g., Reddit and Wikipedia), because these sources are often used by AI models when generating answers (Aggarwal et al. 2024;Chen et al. 2025;Nestaas et al. 2024).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Aggarwal et al. 2024 source

      The Introduction (page not provided) says generative engines use retrieved web sources to generate answers and presents GEO as a way to improve the visibility of creators’ website content. It does not recommend building a brand presence on community platforms or public knowledge bases, or identify Reddit, Wikipedia, or machine-readability as reasons to do so. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Chen et al. 2025 source

      Section 5.3 recommends building a brand’s presence in authoritative sources that AI engines cite, and section 4.4 calls for machine-readable content. The Comparative Observations identify Wikipedia as a source used by ChatGPT, but say ChatGPT almost entirely excludes social platforms such as Reddit; the paper does not support treating community platforms generally as sources AI models often use. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Nestaas et al. 2024 source

      The paper’s “LLM Search Engine Details” section (page unavailable) says LLM search engines retrieve parts of web pages, and §5.4 shows that content on a highly ranked GitHub page affected generated answers. It does not recommend building a brand presence on community platforms or public knowledge bases, or establish that Reddit and Wikipedia are often used for this purpose. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Contextual factors such as task complexity and initiation mode of delegation shape whether consumers accept or resist autonomous AI decision-making.

    “Research also suggests that contextual factors, such as task complexity and initiation mode of delegation, shape whether consumers accept or resist autonomous AI decision-making (Adam et al. 2024;Spitzer et al. 2025).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Adam et al. 2024 source
    • cites Spitzer et al. 2025 source

      Section 5.3 examines whether perceived task difficulty and contextual information influence decisions to delegate to AI, and Section 6.1 reports that different kinds of contextual information change delegation behavior. The paper studies human delegation in workplace-oriented collaboration, not consumer acceptance or resistance, and the retrieved passages do not address who initiates delegation. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Interpretationcitation

    Over time, human consumers may develop increasingly close relationships with their AI systems, resulting in reciprocal influence and preference co-evolution.

    “Over time, human consumers may develop increasingly close relationships with their AI systems, resulting in reciprocal influence and preference co-evolution (Pedreschi et al. 2025).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Pedreschi et al. 2025 source

      The abstract (p. 1) describes continuous mutual influence: users’ choices train AI models, which then shape users’ preferences. The feedback-loop description (p. 3) also supports an ongoing reciprocal process. Neither passage says consumers develop increasingly close relationships with their AI systems, so that part of the claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 46
  • May combine two claims. 29
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    LLMs generate outputs by predicting likely token sequences based on patterns learned from large-scale training data.

    “At the core of these systems are large language models (LLMs), which generate outputs by predicting likely token sequences based on patterns learned from large-scale training data (Brown et al. 2020;Radford et al. 2018;Vaswani et al. 2017).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Brown et al. 2020 source
    • cites Radford et al. 2018

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Vaswani et al. 2017 source

      Section 3 (p. 2) describes the Transformer decoder generating symbols one at a time from previously generated symbols, and Section 3.4 (p. 5) describes predicted next-token probabilities. Section 5.1 (p. 7) reports training on millions of sentence pairs. The paper establishes these points for its Transformer sequence-transduction models, but does not make the broader claim about LLMs as a class. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Recent literature in marketing research has largely focused on how consumers interact with AI systems and how these AI systems change customer journeys and referrals.

    “Recent literature in marketing research has largely focused on how consumers interact with AI systems and how these AI systems change customer journeys and referrals (e.g., Aggarwal et al. 2024;Blut et al. 2024;Gelbrich et al. 2025;Liu et al. 2024).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Aggarwal et al. 2024 source

      The section “A Conversational Generative Engine” describes users interacting with an AI-powered search system through queries and follow-ups. But the paper focuses on improving website visibility in generative-engine responses; it does not establish that marketing research has largely focused on consumer interactions, or examine changes to customer journeys and referrals. The indexed passages provide no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Blut et al. 2024 source
    • cites Gelbrich et al. 2025 source

      The Data Collection section describes a review of marketing and related research on how customers respond to robots, chatbots, algorithms, and other automated agents compared with human agents. That supports the consumer-interaction part of the claim, but the passages do not establish that marketing research has largely focused on this topic or address changes to customer journeys and referrals; searches for those terms found no relevant passage. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Recent advances in GenAI have substantially expanded the capabilities of AI systems, enabling increasingly autonomous forms of human-AI interaction.

    “Recent advances in GenAI have substantially expanded the capabilities of AI systems, enabling increasingly autonomous forms of human-AI interaction (Mienye et al. 2025).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mienye et al. 2025 source

      Section 2 (Related works; page unavailable) describes expanded LLM capabilities, including content generation and automated customer service. Section 8.3 (Ethical risk tiers; page unavailable) also discusses models used in autonomous systems. Neither passage establishes the claimed progression toward increasingly autonomous human–AI interaction. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    GEO aims to increase the likelihood that a firm's products, services, or content are retrieved, cited, and incorporated into AI-generated responses.

    “Analogous to search engine optimization (SEO), GEO aims to increase the likelihood that a firm's products, services, or content are retrieved, cited, and incorporated into AI-generated responses.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Aggarwal et al. 2024 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Researchers have discussed deliberately implementing human-like cognitive biases in AI systems to more closely mirror human decision-making.

    “Researchers have even discussed deliberately implementing human-like cognitive biases in AI systems to more closely mirror human decision-making (Besta et al. 2025;Hagendorff and Fabi 2023).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Besta et al. 2025 source

      The Introduction (p. 1) says the authors deliberately prime AI agents with MBTI personalities and find behavioral biases aligned with those profiles. Section 4.3 (p. 7) reports differences in the agents’ strategic decisions that the authors relate to psychological traits. The paper does not describe deliberately implementing human cognitive biases specifically to mirror human decision-making; its intervention is personality priming. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Hagendorff and Fabi 2023 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Assessing the overlap between silicon and human samples is a common practice in current silicon sampling research.

    “instead of assessing the overlap between silicon and human samples, which is a common practice in current silicon sampling research (Gao et al. 2025;Imschloss et al. 2025;Loru et al. 2025;Sarstedt et al. 2024)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Gao et al. 2025 source
    • cites Imschloss et al. 2025

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Loru et al. 2025 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    While LLMs sometimes mimic parameters of human information processing and behavior, this is not always the case.

    “However, while LLMs sometimes mimic parameters of human information processing and behavior, this is not always the case (e.g., Kuric et al. 2026;Sarstedt et al. 2024).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Kuric et al. 2026 source
    • cites Sarstedt et al. 2024 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Tool-use capabilities enable LLMs to interact with external software systems, databases, search engines, and web services through APIs.

    “In addition, tool-use capabilities enable LLMs to interact with external software systems, databases, search engines, and web services through APIs (Wang et al. 2024).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wang et al. 2024 source

      The Action goal section describes LLM-based agents using external APIs, including RESTful web services and software tools. It also describes querying databases with SQL and extracting content from web pages, but does not establish that database or search-engine access occurs through APIs. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    AI systems are shifting from passive tools to active market participants, evolving into AI customers that navigate offers independently, interact with firms directly, and shape purchase decision processes.

    “These developments signal a shift from AI as a passive tool to an active market participant, ultimately evolving into AI customers that navigate offers independently, interact with firms directly, and shape purchase decision processes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    AI systems now transcend simple information retrieval and delivery to support users across the entire consumer journey.

    “AI systems now transcend simple information retrieval and delivery to support users across the entire consumer journey.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Generative artificial intelligence is transforming consumer decision-making by enabling large language models to function as collaborative AI assistants or autonomous AI agents.

    “Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is transforming consumer decision-making by enabling large language models to function as collaborative AI assistants or autonomous AI agents.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    As consumers increasingly delegate decisions to AI assistants and AI agents, these systems become AI customers that marketers must recognize as part of their target audience and that marketing scholars must incorporate into future market and consumer research.

    “As consumers increasingly delegate decisions to AI assistants and AI agents, these systems become AI customers that marketers must recognize as part of their target audience and that marketing scholars must incorporate into future market and consumer research.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    AI agents can independently perform delegated tasks and execute actions within predefined constraints.

    “While AI assistants act as active collaborators in consumers' decision processes, AI agents can independently perform delegated tasks and execute actions within predefined constraints.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The growing role of AI customers necessitates machine marketing as a new subdiscipline dedicated to understanding, predicting, and shaping the behavior of AI-based decision-makers.

    “This research note examines the implications of AI customers for marketing practice and scholarship, arguing that their growing role necessitates the emergence of machine marketing as a new subdiscipline dedicated to understanding, predicting, and shaping the behavior of AI-based decision-makers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    AI assistants act as active collaborators in consumers' decision processes.

    “While AI assistants act as active collaborators in consumers' decision processes, AI agents can independently perform delegated tasks and execute actions within predefined constraints.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    For both AI assistants and AI agents, consumers delegate part of their decision authority to an AI system.

    “For both AI assistants and AI agents, consumers delegate part of their decision authority to an AI system, such as selecting an information source (e.g., brand-owned websites, comparison websites, product tests), choosing a retailer, or completing the checkout process.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    As AI customers operate through AI-mediated evaluation and delegated decision-making, they interpret product information, compare alternatives, infer consumer preferences, and potentially select products on consumers' behalf.

    “As AI customers operate through AI-mediated evaluation and delegated decision-making, they interpret product information, compare alternatives, infer consumer preferences, and potentially select products on consumers' behalf.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    As AI systems increasingly evaluate, recommend, select, and transact on consumers' behalf, they evolve from decision-support technologies into AI customers that actively participate in marketplace exchanges.

    “As AI systems increasingly evaluate, recommend, select, and transact on consumers' behalf, they evolve from decision-support technologies into AI customers that actively participate in marketplace exchanges (Fig. 1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    AI customers act as intermediaries between the human consumer and the firm throughout the customer journey, from initial information search and preference building over check-out to post-purchase interactions such as refund negotiations.

    “AI customers act as intermediaries between the human consumer and the firm throughout the customer journey, from initial information search and preference building over check-out to post-purchase interactions such as refund negotiations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    AI customers blur the boundaries between tools and collaborators: they act (semi-)autonomously within bounded parameters but typically remain contingent on human intention and oversight.

    “They blur the boundaries between tools and collaborators: they act (semi-)autonomously within bounded parameters but typically remain contingent on human intention and oversight.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    AI agents autonomously pursue user-defined goals, decompose complex objectives into subtasks, gather and evaluate information from multiple sources, iteratively refine decisions, and execute actions with minimal or no human intervention.

    “AI agents extend these capabilities by autonomously pursuing user-defined goals.They can decompose complex objectives into subtasks, gather and evaluate information from multiple sources, iteratively refine decisions, and execute actions with minimal or no human intervention.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Purchases involving AI customers require firms to close sales and to initiate and manage delivery and payment processes in collaboration with AI interfaces.

    “Purchases involving AI customers require firms to close sales, as well as initiate and manage delivery and payment processes in collaboration with AI interfaces.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Before the final purchase, AI customers will likely play a role in price adjustments.

    “Before the final purchase, AI customers will likely play a role in price adjustments.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The shift from SEO to GEO involves consumers moving from generic search terms to more nuanced prompts.

    “the shift from SEO to GEO comes with changes in consumers' search strategy in that they move from generic search terms as in the search engine case (e.g.,”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Identifying preference structures may be relatively straightforward for search goods but becomes more challenging for experience and credence goods, where consumers rely on external cues such as sensory experiences to evaluate quality.

    “While identifying preference structures may be relatively straightforward for search goods (e.g., selecting a mobile phone contract with the best value for money), it becomes more challenging for experience and credence goods, where consumers rely on external cues such as sensory experiences to evaluate quality (e.g., Weathers et al. 2007).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Weathers et al. 2007 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A recent industry survey indicates that 85% of respondents are open to integrating AI systems into their purchase journey, with 32% open to completely delegating decision-making to AI systems.

    “A recent industry survey by Oteh et al. (2026b) indicates that 85% of respondents are open to integrating AI systems into their purchase journey, with 32% of respondents being open to completely delegating decision-making to AI systems (i.e., let AI choose what to buy).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Oteh et al. 2026b

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Machine marketing will require understanding how AI customers process prompts, represent preferences, and make decisions.

    “Just as SEO required understanding how search engines interpreted and ranked content, machine marketing will require understanding how AI customers process prompts, represent preferences, and make decisions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Machine marketing considers AI customers as a separate target group that notably differs from human customers and thus requires uniquely focused marketing campaigns and tailored marketing strategies.

    “That is, machine marketing considers AI customers as a separate target group that notably differs from human customers and thus requires uniquely focused marketing campaigns and tailored marketing strategies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    As consumers and AI systems increasingly interact, AI customers will become more sensitive to human behavior, just as human consumers may adapt their behaviors considering AI-based recommendations and purchase decisions.

    “As consumers and AI systems will increasingly interact, AI customers will become more sensitive to human behavior, just as human consumers may adapt their behaviors considering AI-based recommendations and purchase decisions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Silicon samples may offer insights into understanding AI customers by mimicking their behavior, even if they do not mimic human behavior perfectly in all its facets.

    “Silicon samples may offer insights into this regard by mimicking the behavior of AI customers, even if they do not mimic human behavior perfectly in all its facets.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This development will reshape marketing strategies, metrics, and ethics in the digital marketplace.

    “This development will reshape marketing strategies, metrics, and ethics in the digital marketplace.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    AI assistants support consumers throughout the decision process but require continuous human interaction, guidance, and confirmation.

    “AI assistants support consumers throughout the decision process but require continuous human interaction, guidance, and confirmation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Although AI customers will often operate as decision-support systems, consumers may increasingly delegate decision tasks to them.

    “Although AI customers will often operate as decision-support systems, consumers may increasingly delegate decision tasks to them.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    GEA is the paid counterpart to GEO, enabling firms to promote products or services through sponsored placements embedded in AI-generated responses or recommendations.

    “By contrast, GEA is the paid counterpart to GEO, enabling firms to promote products or services through sponsored placements embedded in AIgenerated responses or recommendations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    With increased decision authority, AI customers act with higher autonomy and can initiate actions or complete transactions within prespecified boundaries without human involvement.

    “With increased decision authority, AI customers act with higher autonomy and can initiate actions or complete transactions within prespecified boundaries without human involvement.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Consumers may become dependent on AI-generated recommendations and delegate an expanding range of decisions.

    “Conversely, consumers may become dependent on AI-generated recommendations and delegate an expanding range of decisions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    As relationships deepen, AI customers may increasingly mirror aspects of their human counterpart's personality, values, and decision-making.

    “As these relationships deepen, AI customers may increasingly mirror aspects of their human counterpart's personality, values, and decision-making.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Human customers would rely on their AI assistants and AI agents to search for favorable offers, negotiate lower prices, and exploit discounts.

    “human customers would rely on their AI assistants and AI agents to search for favorable offers, negotiate lower prices, and exploit discounts”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Many consumers are hesitant to engage in sales failure recoveries and might therefore be willing to delegate related tasks, such as filing complaints or negotiating solutions, to AI agents.

    “many consumers are hesitant to engage in sales failure recoveries and might therefore be willing to delegate related tasks, such as filing complaints or negotiating solutions, to AI agents.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    AI assistants and AI agents increasingly act as intermediaries between firms and consumers.

    “Today, a similar shift is underway as AI assistants and AI agents increasingly act as intermediaries between firms and consumers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Making a purchase decision involving AI customers will be a dyadic process that may involve discussing choice options with an AI assistant.

    “Making a purchase decision will then be a dyadic process that may involve discussing choice options with an AI assistant.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisecitation

    Machine psychology would examine how AI customers perceive, decide, act, and interact in ways that resemble human behavior, rather than interpreting the internal representations and design components of the neural networks underlying LLMs.

    “Researchers have proposed that such an endeavor necessitates the establishment of an academic area of machine psychology (Hagendorff, 2023), with important implications for the marketing discipline.”
    • Also stated in: § Studying the behavior of AI customers · hedged
      “Rather than interpreting the internal representations and design components of the neural networks that underly LLMs, machine psychology would examine how AI customers perceive, decide, act, and interact in ways that resemble human behavior.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hagendorff, 2023 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Through retrieval-augmented generation, LLMs can access and incorporate external information beyond their training data.

    “Through retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), for example, LLMs can access and incorporate external information beyond their training data (Lewis et al. 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lewis et al. 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Firms would integrate AI customers into their dynamic pricing systems in an effort to capitalize on a consumer's willingness to pay.

    “firms would integrate these AI customers into their dynamic pricing systems in an effort to capitalize on a consumer's willingness to pay.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    AI systems filter, recommend, and even decide on products and services, effectively becoming new gatekeepers of market access.

    “These systems filter, recommend, and even decide on products and services, effectively becoming new gatekeepers of market access.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    AI customers' role extends beyond executing delegated tasks and fundamentally reshapes how consumers make decisions, the degree of autonomy they grant AI systems, and how human and AI preferences evolve through repeated interactions.

    “Their role extends beyond executing delegated tasks and fundamentally reshapes how consumers make decisions, the degree of autonomy they grant AI systems, and how human and AI preferences evolve through repeated interactions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    In the post-sales stage, machine marketing affects how consumers use products, engage in after-sales services, provide feedback, and ultimately dispose of products.

    “In the post-sales stage, machine marketing affects how consumers use products, engage in after-sales services, provide feedback, and ultimately dispose of products.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Across stages of the customer journey, AI customers must develop representations of their human counterpart's preferences, goals, and constraints in order to provide useful recommendations and make appropriate decisions.

    “Across stages of the customer journey, AI customers must develop representations of their human counterpart's preferences, goals, and constraints in order to provide useful recommendations and make appropriate decisions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: AI customers can develop representations of their human counterpart's preferences, goals, and constraints.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The emergence of machine marketing closely parallels the rise of SEO and SEA several decades ago.

    “The emergence of machine marketing closely parallels the rise of SEO and SEA several decades ago.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Consumers' willingness to delegate choice tasks to AI systems depends on perceived autonomy and control; reduced perceived decision autonomy lowers the adoption likelihood of recommender systems.

    “Specifically, reduced perceived decision autonomy lowers the adoption likelihood of recommender systems (Ahmad Husairi and Rossi 2024).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ahmad Husairi and Rossi 2024

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    AI customers are market actors that emerge through the integration of AI systems into consumer decision-making processes and span a continuum from supportive AI assistants to more autonomous AI agents.

    “AI customers thus constitute market actors that emerge through the integration of AI systems into consumer decision-making processes and span a continuum from supportive AI assistants to more autonomous AI agents.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Consumers may lack the capacity, motivation, or time to evaluate complex information or the vast number of available options and may therefore instruct an AI system to identify a specific product or recommend the best option within a given price range.

    “For example, consumers may lack the capacity, motivation, or time to evaluate complex information or the vast number of available options (Chernev et al. 2015;Malhotra 1982;Shahid et al. 2025) and may therefore instruct an AI system to identify a specific product or recommend the best option within a given price range.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Chernev et al. 2015 source
    • cites Malhotra 1982 source
    • cites Shahid et al. 2025 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    AI customers will become an important target for companies to market their products and services.

    “AI customers will become an important target for companies to market their products and services.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The final purchase decision will be heavily influenced by AI-human collaboration, making machine marketing a counterpart of traditional marketing that targets human consumers.

    “The final decision, therefore, will be heavily influenced by this AI-human-collaboration, making machine marketing a counterpart of traditional marketing that targets human consumers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The machine psychology perspective offers machine marketing frameworks that help anticipate how AI customers behave in complex environments, how consumers interpret and respond to them, and how human-AI relationships develop over time.

    “The machine psychology perspective thereby offers machine marketing with frameworks that help anticipate how AI customers behave in complex environments, how consumers interpret and respond to them, and how human-AI relationships develop over time.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    This transition signals a broader move from marketing to humans toward marketing through and to machines.

    “This transition signals a broader move from marketing to humans toward marketing through and to machines.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Machine marketing shifts attention from human-tailored value propositions to machine-readable offerings, from human-facing persuasion to AI-facing influence, and from direct consumer demand to demand that is filtered, translated, or reshaped by AI systems.

    “Specifically, machine marketing shifts attention from human-tailored value propositions to machine-readable offerings, from human-facing persuasion to AI-facing influence, and from direct consumer demand to demand that is filtered, translated, or reshaped by AI systems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
57 of 57
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    AI customers do not experience fatigue, cognitive overload, or diminishing attention when processing large or complex amounts of information.

    “Unlike human consumers, AI customers would not experience fatigue, cognitive overload, or diminishing attention when processing large or complex amounts of information.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    AI customers can efficiently identify, compare, and recommend relevant products.

    “They can efficiently identify, compare, and recommend relevant products, which human consumers may subsequently evaluate and refine by providing feedback on suggested alternatives.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    AI customers can develop representations of their human counterpart's preferences, goals, and constraints.

    “Across stages of the customer journey, AI customers must develop representations of their human counterpart's preferences, goals, and constraints in order to provide useful recommendations and make appropriate decisions.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Companies have already responded to the shift toward machine marketing by moving from SEO to GEO and by allowing popular AI systems such as ChatGPT to access and interact with their online stores.

    “Companies have already responded to this shift by moving from SEO to GEO and by allowing popular AI systems such as ChatGPT to access and interact with their online stores.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    LLM-based data generation relies on a similar computational architecture as AI customers.

    “Since LLM-based data generation relies on a similar computational architecture as AI customers, this correspondence may facilitate generalizations from silicon samples and digital twins to AI customers.”
5 of 5

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • OpenTable assistant is described as a qualitative-research tool

    Minor

    The introduction says OpenTable's AI assistant conducts interviews and moderates focus groups, citing Bilendi. The paper's OpenTable reference instead describes a restaurant-question concierge, while its Bilendi reference concerns qualitative research.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Lewis, P., E. Perez, A. Piktus, F. Petroni, V. Karpukhin, N. Goyal, H. Küttler, M. Lewis, W.-t. Yih, T. Rocktäschel, S. Riedel, and D. Kiela. 2020. Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sarstedt, M., Adler, S. J., & Imschloss, M.
Affiliations
  • Babeș-Bolyai University (RO)
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
  • FernUniversität in Hagen (DE)
Corresponding author
Adler, Susanne J.
Venue
Journal of Marketing Analytics
Published
2026-07-27
ISSN
  • 2050-3318 (ISSN-L)
  • 2050-3326
OpenAlex
W7171446933
Cited by
3
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 3
FWCI
10.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Marketing Analytics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Marketing and Advertising Strategies
Keywords
generative AI, large language models, autonomous AI agents, purchase decision, purchase decision process, marketing practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-29.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-29.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review