PreprintCited by 8Topic ModelingArtificial Intelligence ApplicationsNatural Language Processing Techniques

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

LLMs4All: A Review of Large Language Models Across Academic Disciplines

Open access
Ye, Yanfang, Zhang, Zheyuan, Ma, Tianyi, Wang, Zehong, Li, Yiyang, Hou, Shifu, Sun, Weixiang, Shi, Kaiwen, Ma, Yijun, Song, Wei, Abbasi, Ahmed, Cheng, Ying, Cleland-Huang, Jane, Corcelli, Steven, Goulding, Robert, Hu, Ming, Hua, Ting, Lalor, John, Liu, Fang, Luo, Tengfei, Maginn, Edward, Moniz, Nuno, Rohr, Jason, Savoie, Brett, Slate, Daniel, Webber, Matthew, Wiest, Olaf, Zhang, Johnny, Chawla, Nitesh V.·2025·arXiv

Abstract

Cutting-edge Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques keep reshaping our view of the world. For example, Large Language Models (LLMs) based applications such as ChatGPT have shown the capability of generating human-like conversation on extensive topics. Due to the impressive performance on a variety of language-related tasks (e.g., open-domain question answering, translation, and document summarization), one can envision the far-reaching impacts that can be brought by the LLMs with broader real-world applications (e.g., customer service, education and accessibility, and scientific discovery). Inspired by their success, this paper will offer an overview of state-of-the-art LLMs and their integration into a wide range of academic disciplines, including: (1) arts, letters, and law (e.g., history, philosophy, political science, arts and architecture, law), (2) economics and business (e.g., finance, economics, accounting, marketing), and (3) science and engineering (e.g., mathematics, physics and mechanical engineering, chemistry and chemical engineering, life sciences and bioengineering, earth sciences and civil engineering, computer science and electrical engineering). Integrating humanity and technology, in this paper, we will explore how LLMs are shaping research and practice in these fields, while also discussing key limitations, open challenges, and future directions in the era of generative AI. The review of how LLMs are engaged across disciplines-along with key observations and insights-can help researchers and practitioners interested in exploiting LLMs to advance their works in diverse real-world applications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2509.19580

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The rapid adoption of LLMs and other generative systems has introduced a qualitatively new risk: the automatic creation of bibliographic entries that have no counterpart in the scholarly record.

    “However, the rapid adoption of large language models (LLMs) [28] and other generative systems [29] has introduced a qualitatively new risk: the automatic creation of bibliographic entries that have no counterpart in the scholarly record.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ye, Y., Zhang, Z., Ma, T., Wang, Z., Li, Y., Hou, S., Sun, W., Shi, K., Ma, Y., Song, W., Abbasi, A., Cheng, Y., Cleland-Huang, J., Corcelli, S., Goulding, R., Hu, M., Hua, T., Lalor, J., Liu, F., Luo, T., Maginn, E., Moniz, N., Rohr, J., Savoie, B., Slate, D., Webber, M., Wiest, O., Zhang, J., & Chawla, N. V.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2025
OpenAlex
W4415343716
Cited by
8
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Preprints.org (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
Keywords
large language models, generative AI, interdisciplinary applications, humanities and social sciences, economics and business, science and engineering, ChatGPT, open-domain question answering, document summarization, translation, scientific discovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review