PreprintCited by 3Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsTopic ModelingDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Words That Make Language Models Perceive

Open access
Wang, Sophie L., Isola, Phillip, Cheung, Brian·2025·arXiv

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) trained purely on text ostensibly lack any direct perceptual experience, yet their internal representations are implicitly shaped by multimodal regularities encoded in language. We test the hypothesis that explicit sensory prompting can surface this latent structure, bringing a text-only LLM into closer representational alignment with specialist vision and audio encoders. When a sensory prompt tells the model to 'see' or 'hear', it cues the model to resolve its next-token predictions as if they were conditioned on latent visual or auditory evidence that is never actually supplied. Our findings reveal that lightweight prompt engineering can reliably activate modality-appropriate representations in purely text-trained LLMs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2510.02425

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Support for the genuine understanding view comes from mechanistic investigation: LLM can dynamically construct perceptually grounded representations of text-only inputs, as if seeing or hearing.

    “Support for the ‘genuine understanding’ view comes from mechanistic investigation. LLM can dynamically construct perceptually grounded representations of text-only inputs, as if they are ‘seeing’ or ‘hearing’ the information67.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

  • The Llama 3 Herd of Models

    Grattafiori, A., Dubey, A., Jauhri, A., Pandey, A., Kadian, A., Al-Dahle, A., Letman, A., Mathur, A., Schelten, A., Vaughan, A., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.21783 · Cited by 505 · cited 1× · see citing works

    “Figure 30 shows projections under “describe” prompting, which we compare to “imagine” prompting from Figure 8 0.”
    Self-citation

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Marah Abdin, Jyoti Aneja, Harkirat Behl, Sébastien Bubeck, Ronen Eldan, Suriya Gunasekar, Michael Harrison, Russell J. Hewett, Mojan Javaheripi, Piero Kauffmann, James R. Lee, Yin Tat Lee, Yuanzhi Li, Weishung Liu, Caio C. T. Mendes, Anh Nguyen, Eric Price, Gustavo de Rosa, Olli Saarikivi, Adil Salim, Shital Shah, Xin Wang, Rachel Ward, Yue Wu, Dingli Yu, Cyril Zhang, and Yi Zhang. Phi-4 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.08905 , 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.08905 . · arXiv
  2. Mostafa Abdou, Artur Kulmizev, Daniel Hershcovich, Stella Frank, Ellie Pavlick, and Anders Søgaard. Can language models encode perceptual structure without grounding? a case study in color. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.06129 , 2021. · arXiv
  3. Kumar Ashutosh, Yossi Gandelsman, Xinlei Chen, Ishan Misra, and Rohit Girdhar. Llms can see and hear without any training. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.18096 , 2025. · arXiv
  4. Mahmoud Assran, Ishan Misra, Piotr Bojanowski, Nicolas Ballas, Michael Rabbat, Yann LeCun, and Armand Joulin. Masked siamese networks for label-efficient learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , 2023.
  5. Wenhao Chai, Enxin Song, Yilun Du, Chenlin Meng, Vashisht Madhavan, Omer Bar-Tal, Jenq-Neng Hwang, Saining Xie, and Christopher D Manning. Auroracap: Efficient, performant video detailed captioning and a new benchmark. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.03051 , 2024. · arXiv
  6. Caroline Chan, Hyojin Bahng, Fredo Durand, and Phillip Isola. On the cycle consistency of image-text mappings, 2025. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=1Qn1pMLYas .
  7. Konstantinos Drossos, Samuel Lipping, and Tuomas Virtanen. Clotho: An audio captioning dataset. In ICASSP 2020-2020 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) , pp. 736-740. IEEE, 2020.
  8. Benjamin Elizalde, Soham Deshmukh, Mahmoud Al Ismail, and Huaming Wang. Clap learning audio concepts from natural language supervision. In ICASSP 2023-2023 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) , pp. 1-5. IEEE, 2023.
  9. Chaoyou Fu, Peixian Chen, Yunhang Shen, Yulei Qin, Mengdan Zhang, Xu Lin, Jinrui Yang, Xiawu Zheng, Ke Li, Xing Sun, et al. Mme: A comprehensive evaluation benchmark for multimodal large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.13394 , 2023a. · arXiv
  10. Stephanie Fu, Netanel Tamir, Shobhita Sundaram, Lucy Chai, Richard Zhang, Tali Dekel, and Phillip Isola. Dreamsim: Learning new dimensions of human visual similarity using synthetic data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.09344 , 2023b. · arXiv
  11. Yuan Gong, Yu-An Chung, Wei-Ning Hsu, Kushal Lakhotia, and James Glass. Eat: Efficient audio transformers with self-supervised learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) , 2023.
  12. Sophia Gu, Christopher Clark, and Aniruddha Kembhavi. I can't believe there's no images! learning visual tasks using only language supervision. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision , pp. 2672-2683, 2023.
  13. Stevan Harnad. The symbol grounding problem. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena , 42(1-3):335-346, 1990.
  14. Kaiming He, Xinlei Chen, Saining Xie, Yanghao Li, Piotr Dollár, and Ross Girshick. Masked autoencoders are scalable vision learners. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , 2022.
  15. Qiushi Huang, Yuan Gong, Yu-An Chung, and James Glass. Masked autoencoders that listen. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) , 2022.
  16. Minyoung Huh, Brian Cheung, Tongzhou Wang, and Phillip Isola. The platonic representation hypothesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.07987 , 2024. · arXiv
  17. Chris Dongjoo Kim, Byeongchang Kim, Hyunmin Lee, and Gunhee Kim. Audiocaps: Generating captions for audios in the wild. In NAACL-HLT , 2019.
  18. Ranjay Krishna, Yuke Zhu, Oliver Groth, Justin Johnson, Kenji Hata, Joshua Kravitz, Stephanie Chen, Yannis Kalantidis, Li-Jia Li, David A Shamma, et al. Visual genome: Connecting language and vision using crowdsourced dense image annotations. International journal of computer vision , 123(1):32-73, 2017.
  19. Maxime Oquab, Timothée Darcet, Théo Moutakanni, Huy Vo, Marc Szafraniec, Vasil Khalidov, Pierre Fernandez, Daniel Haziza, Francisco Massa, Alaaeldin El-Nouby, et al. Dinov2: Learning robust visual features without supervision. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.07193 , 2023. · arXiv
  20. Roma Patel and Ellie Pavlick. Mapping language models to grounded conceptual spaces. In International conference on learning representations , 2022.
  21. Ellie Pavlick. Symbols and grounding in large language models. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A , 381(2251):20220041, 2023.
  22. Dustin Podell, Zion English, Kyle Lacey, Andreas Blattmann, Tim Dockhorn, Jonas Müller, Joe Penna, and Robin Rombach. SDXL: Improving latent diffusion models for high-resolution image synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.01952 , 2023. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2307.01952 . URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.01952 . · DOI · Paper page
  23. Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agarwal, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark, et al. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In International conference on machine learning , pp. 8748-8763. PmLR, 2021.
  24. Krishna Srinivasan, Karthik Raman, Jiecao Chen, Michael Bendersky, and Marc Najork. Wit: Wikipedia-based image text dataset for multimodal multilingual machine learning. In Proceedings of the 44th international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval , pp. 2443-2449, 2021.
  25. Jack Urbanek, Florian Bordes, Pietro Astolfi, Mary Williamson, Vasu Sharma, and Adriana Romero-Soriano. A picture is worth more than 77 text tokens: Evaluating clip-style models on dense captions. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pp. 26700-26709, June 2024.
  26. Ludwig Wittgenstein. Philosophical Investigations . Blackwell, Oxford, UK, 1953. Translated by G. E. M. Anscombe, §§43-44.
  27. Qihui Xu, Yingying Peng, Samuel A Nastase, Martin Chodorow, Minghua Wu, and Ping Li. Large language models without grounding recover non-sensorimotor but not sensorimotor features of human concepts. Nature human behaviour , pp. 1-16, 2025.
  28. An Yang, Anfeng Li, Baosong Yang, Beichen Zhang, Binyuan Hui, Bo Zheng, Bowen Yu, Chang Gao, Chengen Huang, Chenxu Lv, et al. Qwen3 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.09388 , 2025. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, S. L., Isola, P., & Cheung, B.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2025
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4416368229
Cited by
0
References
1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
large language models, modality-specific representations, visual and auditory perception, prompt engineering, next-token prediction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review