PreprintCited by 3Speech and dialogue systemsIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningRecommender Systems and Techniques

Enabling Personalized Long-term Interactions in LLM-based Agents through Persistent Memory and User Profiles

Open access
Westhäußer, Rebecca, Minker, Wolfgang, Zepf, Sebatian·2025·arXiv

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) increasingly serve as the central control unit of AI agents, yet current approaches remain limited in their ability to deliver personalized interactions. While Retrieval Augmented Generation enhances LLM capabilities by improving context-awareness, it lacks mechanisms to combine contextual information with user-specific data. Although personalization has been studied in fields such as human-computer interaction or cognitive science, existing perspectives largely remain conceptual, with limited focus on technical implementation. To address these gaps, we build on a unified definition of personalization as a conceptual foundation to derive technical requirements for adaptive, user-centered LLM-based agents. Combined with established agentic AI patterns such as multi-agent collaboration or multi-source retrieval, we present a framework that integrates persistent memory, dynamic coordination, self-validation, and evolving user profiles to enable personalized long-term interactions. We evaluate our approach on three public datasets using metrics such as retrieval accuracy, response correctness, or BertScore. We complement these results with a five-day pilot user study providing initial insights into user feedback on perceived personalization. The study provides early indications that guide future work and highlights the potential of integrating persistent memory and user profiles to improve the adaptivity and perceived personalization of LLM-based agents.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2510.07925

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Memory modules internalize interactions into persistent traits of the persona to ensure uniformity in behavior.

    “finally, they internalize interactions into persistent traits of the persona to ensure uniformity in behavior (Park et al., 2023; Westhäußer et al., 2025; Liang et al., 2025).”

    From From Storage to Experience: A Survey on the Evolution of LLM Agent Memory Mechanisms (2026) · cites this paper as Westhäußer et al., 2025

    Section 3.3.4 says the user profile integrates past interactions into a stable representation of user traits, and section 3.3.3 says memory enables consistent interactions across sessions. The paper describes a profile of the user, however, not persistent traits of the agent’s persona or uniformity in its behavior. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. Rishabh Agrawal, Murtaza Asrani, Hadi Youssef, and Apurva Narayan. 2025. SCMRAG: Self-Corrective Multihop Retrieval Augmented Generation System for LLM Agents. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. 50-58.
  2. Shweta Bajpai, Ram Bajpai, and Himanshu Chaturvedi. 2015. Evaluation of inter- rater agreement and inter-rater reliability for observational data: an overview of concepts and methods. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology 41, 3 (2015), 20-27.
  3. Tahsin Tariq Banna, Sejuti Rahman, and Mohammad Tareq. 2025. Beyond Words: Integrating Personality Traits and Context-Driven Gestures in Human-Robot Interactions. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. 242-251.
  4. Michael Beetz, Martin Buss, and Dirk Wollherr. 2007. Cognitive technical sys- tems-what is the role of artificial intelligence?. In Annual Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Springer, 19-42.
  5. Jan Blom. 2000. Personalization: a taxonomy. In CHI'00 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. 313-314.
  6. Min Chen and Kai Hwang. 2017. Big-Data analytics for cloud, IoT and cognitive learning. Wiley.
  7. Brendan Conway-Smith and Robert L West. 2024. Toward autonomy: Metacogni- tive learning for enhanced AI performance. In Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series, Vol. 3. 545-546.
  8. Emre Erdogan, Rineke Verbrugge, and Pınar Yolum. 2024. Computational Theory of Mind with Abstractions for Effective Human-Agent Collaboration. In 23rd International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2024. ACM Press Digital Library, 2249-2251.
  9. Haiyan Fan and Marshall Scott Poole. 2006. What is personalization? Perspectives on the design and implementation of personalization in information systems. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce 16, 3-4 (2006), 179-202.
  10. Mohamed Amine Ferrag, Norbert Tihanyi, and Merouane Debbah. 2025. From llm reasoning to autonomous ai agents: A comprehensive review. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.19678 (2025). · arXiv
  11. Natasa Gisev, J Simon Bell, and Timothy F Chen. 2013. Interrater agreement and interrater reliability: key concepts, approaches, and applications. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy 9, 3 (2013), 330-338.
  12. Taicheng Guo, Xiuying Chen, Yaqi Wang, Ruidi Chang, Shichao Pei, Nitesh V Chawla, Olaf Wiest, and Xiangliang Zhang. 2024. Large language model based multi-agents: A survey of progress and challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.01680 (2024). · arXiv
  13. Zihong He, Weizhe Lin, Hao Zheng, Fan Zhang, Matt W Jones, Laurence Aitchi- son, Xuhai Xu, Miao Liu, Per Ola Kristensson, and Junxiao Shen. 2024. Human- inspired Perspectives: A Survey on AI Long-term Memory. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.00489 (2024). · arXiv
  14. Xinyi Hou, Yanjie Zhao, Shenao Wang, and Haoyu Wang. 2025. Model context protocol (mcp): Landscape, security threats, and future research directions. URL https://arxiv. org/abs/2503.23278 (2025).
  15. Patrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni, Vladimir Karpukhin, Naman Goyal, Heinrich Küttler, Mike Lewis, Wen-tau Yih, Tim Rocktäschel, et al. 2020. Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive nlp tasks. Advances in neural information processing systems 33 (2020), 9459-9474.
  16. Hang Li, Tianlong Xu, Ethan Chang, and Qingsong Wen. 2025. Knowledge tagging with large language model based multi-agent system. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 39. 28775-28782.
  17. Xiaopeng Li, Pengyue Jia, Derong Xu, Yi Wen, Yingyi Zhang, Wenlin Zhang, Wanyu Wang, Yichao Wang, Zhaocheng Du, Xiangyang Li, et al. 2025. A survey of personalization: From rag to agent. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.10147 (2025). · arXiv
  18. Lei Liu, Xiaoyan Yang, Yue Shen, Binbin Hu, Zhiqiang Zhang, Jinjie Gu, and Guannan Zhang. 2023. Think-in-memory: Recalling and post-thinking enable llms with long-term memory. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.08719 (2023). · arXiv
  19. Adyasha Maharana, Dong-Ho Lee, Sergey Tulyakov, Mohit Bansal, Francesco Bar- bieri, and Yuwei Fang. 2024. Evaluating very long-term conversational memory of llm agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.17753 (2024). · arXiv
  20. Lewis Newsham and Daniel Prince. 2025. Personality-Driven Decision Making in LLM-Based Autonomous Agents. In Proceedings of the 24th International Confer- ence on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (Detroit, MI, USA) (AAMAS '25). International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland, SC, 1538-1547.
  21. Nardine Osman and Mark d'Inverno. 2024. A Computational Framework of Human Values. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (Auckland, New Zealand) (AAMAS '24). Interna- tional Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland, SC, 1531-1539.
  22. Zhuoshi Pan, Qianhui Wu, Huiqiang Jiang, Xufang Luo, Hao Cheng, Dongsheng Li, Yuqing Yang, Chin-Yew Lin, H Vicky Zhao, Lili Qiu, et al. 2025. On memory construction and retrieval for personalized conversational agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.05589 (2025). · arXiv
  23. Yingzhe Peng, Xiaoting Qin, Zhiyang Zhang, Jue Zhang, Qingwei Lin, Xu Yang, Dongmei Zhang, Saravan Rajmohan, and Qi Zhang. 2025. Navigating the Un- known: A Chat-Based Collaborative Interface for Personalized Exploratory Tasks. In Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. 1048-1063.
  24. Ivens Da Silva Portugal, Paulo Alencar, and Donald Cowan. 2024. An agen- tic AI-based multi-agent framework for recommender systems. In 2024 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData). IEEE, 5375-5382.
  25. R Sapkota, KI Roumeliotis, and M Karkee. 2025. AI Agents vs. Agentic AI: A Con- ceptual Taxonomy, Applications and Challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.10468 (2025). · arXiv
  26. Seongbum Seo, Sangbong Yoo, and Yun Jang. 2025. A Prompt Chaining Frame- work for Long-Term Recall in LLM-Powered Intelligent Assistant. In Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. 89-105.
  27. Lianlei Shan, Shixian Luo, Zezhou Zhu, Yu Yuan, and Yong Wu. 2025. Cognitive memory in large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.02441 (2025). · arXiv
  28. Michael Shumanov and Lester Johnson. 2021. Making conversations with chat- bots more personalized. Computers in human behavior 117 (2021), 106627.
  29. Aditi Singh, Abul Ehtesham, Saket Kumar, and Tala Talaei Khoei. 2025. Agen- tic retrieval-augmented generation: A survey on agentic rag. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.09136 (2025). · arXiv
  30. Yinxu Tang, Stylianos Loukas Vasileiou, and William Yeoh. 2025. Does your AI agent get you? A personalizable framework for approximating human models from argumentation-based dialogue traces. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 39. 14405-14413.
  31. Juha Tiihonen and Alexander Felfernig. 2017. An introduction to personalization and mass customization. Journal of intelligent information systems 49, 1 (2017), 1-7.
  32. Jason Toy, Josh MacAdam, and Phil Tabor. 2024. Metacognition is all you need? using introspection in generative agents to improve goal-directed behavior. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.10910 (2024). · arXiv
  33. Yufei Wang, Wanjun Zhong, Liangyou Li, Fei Mi, Xingshan Zeng, Wenyong Huang, Lifeng Shang, Xin Jiang, and Qun Liu. 2023. Aligning large language models with human: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.12966 (2023). · arXiv
  34. Rebecca Westhäußer, Frederik Berenz, Wolfgang Minker, and Sebastian Zepf. 2025. CAIM: Development and Evaluation of a Cognitive AI Memory Framework for Long-Term Interaction with Intelligent Agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.13044 (2025). · arXiv
  35. Di Wu, Hongwei Wang, Wenhao Yu, Yuwei Zhang, Kai-Wei Chang, and Dong Yu. 2024. Longmemeval: Benchmarking chat assistants on long-term interactive memory. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.10813 (2024). · arXiv
  36. Shangyu Wu, Ying Xiong, Yufei Cui, Haolun Wu, Can Chen, Ye Yuan, Lianming Huang, Xue Liu, Tei-Wei Kuo, Nan Guan, et al. 2024. Retrieval-augmented gener- ation for natural language processing: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.13193 (2024). · arXiv
  37. Wujiang Xu, Kai Mei, Hang Gao, Juntao Tan, Zujie Liang, and Yongfeng Zhang. 2025. A-mem: Agentic memory for llm agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.12110 (2025). · arXiv
  38. Ruifeng Yuan, Shichao Sun, Yongqi Li, Zili Wang, Ziqiang Cao, and Wenjie Li. 2023. Personalized large language model assistant with evolving conditional memory. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.17257 (2023). · arXiv
  39. Ruichen Zhang, Shunpu Tang, Yinqiu Liu, Dusit Niyato, Zehui Xiong, Sumei Sun, Shiwen Mao, and Zhu Han. 2025. Toward agentic ai: generative information retrieval inspired intelligent communications and networking. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.16866 (2025). · arXiv
  40. Tianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q Weinberger, and Yoav Artzi. 2019. Bertscore: Evaluating text generation with bert. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.09675 (2019). · arXiv
  41. Zhehao Zhang, Ryan A Rossi, Branislav Kveton, Yijia Shao, Diyi Yang, Hamed Zamani, Franck Dernoncourt, Joe Barrow, Tong Yu, Sungchul Kim, et al. 2024. Per- sonalization of large language models: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.00027 (2024). · arXiv
  42. Wanjun Zhong, Lianghong Guo, Qiqi Gao, He Ye, and Yanlin Wang. 2024. Memo- rybank: Enhancing large language models with long-term memory. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 38. 19724-19731.
  43. Yujia Zhou, Zheng Liu, Jiajie Jin, Jian-Yun Nie, and Zhicheng Dou. 2024. Metacog- nitive retrieval-augmented large language models. In Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2024. 1453-1463.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Westhäußer, R., Minker, W., & Zepf, S.
Affiliations
Universität Ulm (DE)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2025
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4416400872
Cited by
0
References
0
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
Keywords
LLM agents, persistent memory, user profiles, personalization, retrieval-augmented generation, agent cooperation, self-validation, dynamic coordination, user study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review