AutoMLGen: Navigating Fine-Grained Optimization for Coding Agents
Open accessAbstract
Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive performance in general programming tasks. However, in Machine Learning Engineering (MLE) scenarios such as AutoML and Kaggle competitions, achieving high performance depends heavily on expert intervention and repeated adjustments rather than simply generating correct code. When applied directly to these tasks, LLMs often lack fine-grained domain priors, and existing MLE approaches that use linear or tree-structured searches limit knowledge transfer to adjacent hierarchical links. As a result, they cannot leverage past full trajectories or share information across branches, limiting self-evolving ability and search space diversity. To address these limitations, we introduce AutoMLGen, an LLM-based coding agent that integrates a domain knowledge base for high-quality prior guidance and Monte Carlo Graph Search (MCGS) for efficient exploration. MCGS retains the tree-guided exploration of MCTS while embedding a graph structure into the expansion stage to enable dynamic path reorganization, historical trajectory reuse, and multi-solution fusion to support both self-evolution and collaborative learning. Combined with fine-grained operator sets, this design improves stability and accelerates convergence. Evaluation on the MLE-Bench shows that AutoMLGen achieves state-of-the-art performance in numerous dimensions, such as the average medal rate and the valid submission rate, under a 12-hour budget (half the standard runtime). The code is available at https://github.com/Alpha-Innovator/InternAgent.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most existing methods couple planning and code implementation into one-shot generation, lacking hierarchical control.
“Third, most existing methods couple planning and code implementation into one-shot generation, lacking hierarchical control .”
From MLEvolve: A Self-Evolving Framework for Automated Machine Learning Algorithm Discovery (2026) · cites this paper as [20]
The Introduction describes existing MLE agents as iteratively optimizing code and identifies tree search and iterative refinement in prior methods. Section 2.2 calls tree search a dominant paradigm. The paper criticizes isolated search paths and limited reuse of solutions, not a predominance of one-shot generation or a lack of hierarchical control. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Still being checked.
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- Aaron Hurst et al. "Gpt-4o system card". In: arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.21276 (2024). · arXiv
- Daya Guo et al. "Deepseek-r1: Incentivizing reasoning capability in llms via reinforcement learning". In: arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.12948 (2025). · arXiv
- Chen Qian et al. "ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software Development". In: Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024, pp. 15174-15186.
- Sirui Hong et al. "MetaGPT: Meta programming for a multi-agent collaborative framework". In: International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR. 2024.
- Saleema Amershi et al. "Software engineering for machine learning: A case study". In: 2019 IEEE/ACM 41st International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice (ICSE-SEIP). IEEE. 2019, pp. 291-300.
- Jun Shern Chan et al. "MLE-bench: Evaluating Machine Learning Agents on Machine Learning Engineering". In: The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2025, Singapore, April 24-28, 2025. 2025.
- Matthias Feurer et al. "Auto-sklearn 2.0: Hands-free automl via meta-learning". In: Journal of Machine Learning Research 23.261 (2022), pp. 1-61.
- Xingyao Wang et al. "Openhands: An open platform for ai software developers as generalist agents". In: The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations. 2024.
- Qian Huang et al. "Mlagentbench: Evaluating language agents on machine learning experi- mentation, 2024". In: arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.3302 (2023).
- Siyuan Guo et al. "DS-agent: automated data science by empowering large language models with case-based reasoning". In: Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning. 2024, pp. 16813-16848.
- Zhengyao Jiang et al. "Aide: Ai-driven exploration in the space of code". In: arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.13138 (2025). · arXiv
- Xu Yang et al. "R&d-agent: Automating data-driven ai solution building through llm-powered automated research, development, and evolution". In: arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.14738 (2025). · arXiv
- Zexi Liu et al. "ML-Master: Towards AI-for-AI via Integration of Exploration and Reasoning". In: arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.16499 (2025). · arXiv
- Huacan Wang et al. "RepoMaster: Autonomous Exploration and Understanding of GitHub Repositories for Complex Task Solving". In: arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.21577 (2025). · arXiv
- John Yang et al. "SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineer- ing". In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Ed. by A. Globerson et al. Vol. 37.
- Jaehyun Nam et al. "MLE-STAR: Machine Learning Engineering Agent via Search and Targeted Refinement". In: arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.15692 (2025). · arXiv
- Haoyang Fang et al. "Mlzero: A multi-agent system for end-to-end machine learning automa- tion". In: arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.13941 (2025). · arXiv
- Ziming Li et al. "Autokaggle: A multi-agent framework for autonomous data science competi- tions". In: arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.20424 (2024). · arXiv
- Yixin Ou et al. "AutoMind: Adaptive Knowledgeable Agent for Automated Data Science". In: arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.10974 (2025). · arXiv
- NovelSeek Team et al. "NovelSeek: When Agent Becomes the Scientist-Building Closed-Loop System from Hypothesis to Verification". In: arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.16938 (2025). · arXiv
- Edan Toledo et al. "AI Research Agents for Machine Learning: Search, Exploration, and Generalization in MLE-bench". In: arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.02554 (2025). · arXiv
- Stepan Kulibaba et al. "KompeteAI: Accelerated Autonomous Multi-Agent System for End-to- End Pipeline Generation for Machine Learning Problems". In: arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.10177 (2025). · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Survey on the Optimization of Large Language Model-based Agents
Du, S., Zhao, J., Shi, J., Xie, Z., Jiang, X., Bai, Y., & He, L. (2026) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3789261 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Self-citationMLEvolve: A Self-Evolving Framework for Automated Machine Learning Algorithm Discovery
Du, S., Yan, X., Shi, J., Cao, Z., Feng, S., Liang, Z., Sun, B., Peng, T., Zhou, Y., Li, X., et al. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.06473
Self-citationPACE: Unleashing the Power of Code Embeddings to Boost AutoML Agents
Zhao, G., Liang, H., Tang, H., Ma, Y., Liu, J., Du, Z., Zheng, Y., Xiao, C., & Hao, J. (2026) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3770855.3817742
EEMA: Experience-Evolving Meta Agents for AutoML
Tian, K., Wang, W., Zhao, K., Jiang, C., Yang, J., Yuan, Z., Zhong, J., Jia, G., Wang, Y., Long, X., et al. (2026) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/2026.emnlp-main.873
RewardCode: Training Generalist Code Reward Model via Pairwise Reinforcement Learning
Huang, S., Feng, S., He, X., Yan, X., Zhang, B., & Bai, L. (2026) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/2026.findings-emnlp.448
Self-citation
- Authors
- Du, S., Yan, X., Jiang, D., Yuan, J., Hu, Y., Li, X., He, L., Zhang, B., & Bai, L.
- Affiliations
- Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CN)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2025
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2510.08511
- OpenAlex
- W4416385763
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications
- Keywords
- automated machine learning, coding agents, large language models, domain knowledge base, search space exploration, cooperative learning, self-evolution, Kaggle competition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review