CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 1Information Retrieval and Search BehaviorWeb Data Mining and AnalysisRecommender Systems and Techniques

WideSeek: Advancing Wide Research via Multi-Agent Scaling

Open access
Huang, Ziyang, Ren, Haolin, Yuan, Xiaowei, Wang, Jiawei, Jiang, Zhongtao, Xu, Kun, He, Shizhu, Zhao, Jun +1 more·2026·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2602.02636arXiv 2602.02636
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Search intelligence is evolving from Deep Research to Wide Research, a paradigm essential for retrieving and synthesizing comprehensive information under complex constraints in parallel. However, progress in this field is impeded by the lack of dedicated benchmarks and optimization methodologies for search breadth. To address these challenges, we take a deep dive into Wide Research from two perspectives: Data Pipeline and Agent Optimization. First, we produce WideSeekBench, a General Broad Information Seeking (GBIS) benchmark constructed via a rigorous multi-phase data pipeline to ensure diversity across the target information volume, logical constraints, and domains. Second, we introduce WideSeek, a dynamic hierarchical multi-agent architecture that can autonomously fork parallel sub-agents based on task requirements. Furthermore, we design a unified training framework that linearizes multi-agent trajectories and optimizes the system using end-to-end RL. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of WideSeek and multi-agent RL, highlighting that scaling the number of agents is a promising direction for advancing the Wide Research paradigm.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2602.02636

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • WideSeekBench uses a multi-stage generation and quality-control pipeline to produce table-completion tasks with varied target volumes and logical constraints.

    “WideSeekBench [Huang et al., 2026] uses a multi-stage generation and quality-control pipeline to produce table-completion tasks with varied target volumes and logical constraints.”

    From WANDR: A Benchmark for Wide and Deep Research (2026) · cites this paper as Huang et al., 2026

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Abou Ali, M., Dornaika, F., and Charafeddine, J. Agentic ai: a comprehensive survey of architectures, applications, and future directions. Artificial Intelligence Review , 59 (1), November 2025. ISSN 1573-7462. doi: 10.1007/ s10462-025-11422-4. URL http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s10462-025-11422-4 . · DOI
  2. Bast, H. and Buchhold, B. Qlever: A query engine for efficient sparql+text search. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management , CIKM '17, pp. 647-656, New York, NY, USA, 2017. Association for Computing Machinery. ISBN 9781450349185. doi: 10.1145/ 3132847.3132921. URL https://doi.org/10. 1145/3132847.3132921 .
  3. Chen, Z., Ma, X., Zhuang, S., Nie, P., Zou, K., Liu, A., Green, J., Patel, K., Meng, R., Su, M., Sharifymoghaddam, S., Li, Y., Hong, H., Shi, X., Liu, X., Thakur, N., Zhang, C., Gao, L., Chen, W., and Lin, J. Browsecomp-plus: A more fair and transparent evaluation benchmark of deep-research agent, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.06600 . · arXiv
  4. Hong, H., Yin, J., Wang, Y., Liu, J., Chen, Z., Yu, A., Li, J., Ye, Z., Xiao, H., Chen, Y., Zhou, H., Yue, Y., Yang, M., Guo, C., Liu, J., Wei, P., and Gu, J. Multi-agent deep research: Training multi-agent systems with m-grpo, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.13288 . · arXiv
  5. Hong, S., Zhuge, M., Chen, J., Zheng, X., Cheng, Y., Wang, J., Zhang, C., Wang, Z., Yau, S. K. S., Lin, Z., et al. Metagpt: Meta programming for a multi-agent collaborative framework. In The twelfth international conference on learning representations , 2023.
  6. Hu, M., Zhou, Y., Fan, W., Nie, Y., Xia, B., Sun, T., Ye, Z., Jin, Z., Li, Y ., Chen, Q., et al. Owl: Optimized workforce learning for general multi-agent assistance in real-world task automation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.23885 , 2025. · arXiv
  7. Jimenez, C. E., Yang, J., Wettig, A., Yao, S., Pei, K., Press, O., and Narasimhan, K. R. SWE-bench: Can language models resolve real-world github issues? In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations , 2024. URL https://openreview.net/forum? id=VTF8yNQM66 .
  8. Lan, T., Zhu, B., Jia, Q., Ren, J., Li, H., Wang, L., Xu, Z., Luo, W., and Zhang, K. Deepwidesearch: Benchmarking depth and width in agentic information seeking, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.20168 . · arXiv
  9. Lei, F., Meng, J., Huang, Y., Zhao, J., Zhang, Y., Luo, J., Zou, X., Yang, R., Shi, W., Gao, Y., He, S., Wang, Z., Liu, Q., Wang, Y., Wang, K., Zhao, J., and Liu, K. Dacomp: Benchmarking data agents across the full data intelligence lifecycle, 2025. URL https://arxiv. org/abs/2512.04324 .
  10. Li, K., Zhang, Z., Yin, H., Zhang, L., Ou, L., Wu, J., Yin, W., Li, B., Tao, Z., Wang, X., Shen, W., Zhang, J., Zhang, D., Wu, X., Jiang, Y., Yan, M., Xie, P., Huang, F., and Zhou, J. Websailor: Navigating super-human reasoning for web agent, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/ abs/2507.02592 . · arXiv
  11. Liu, S., Chen, T., Liang, Z., Lyu, X., and Amato, C. Llm collaboration with multi-agent reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.04652 , 2025. · arXiv
  12. Lu, R., Hou, Z., Wang, Z., Zhang, H., Liu, X., Li, Y., Feng, S., Tang, J., and Dong, Y. Deepdive: Advancing deep search agents with knowledge graphs and multi-turn rl, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2509. 10446 .
  13. Luo, X., Zhang, Y., He, Z., Wang, Z., Zhao, S., Li, D., Qiu, L. K., and Yang, Y. Agent lightning: Train any ai agents with reinforcement learning, 2025. URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/2508.03680 .
  14. Qian, C., Liu, W., Liu, H., Chen, N., Dang, Y., Li, J., Yang, C., Chen, W., Su, Y., Cong, X., et al. Chatdev: Communicative agents for software development. In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) , pp. 15174-15186, 2024.
  15. Ren, Z., Shao, Z., Song, J., Xin, H., Wang, H., Zhao, W., Zhang, L., Fu, Z., Zhu, Q., Yang, D., et al. Deepseekprover-v2: Advancing formal mathematical reasoning via reinforcement learning for subgoal decomposition. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.21801 , 2025. · arXiv
  16. Schmelzeisen, L., Dima, C., and Staab, S. Wikidated 1.0: An evolving knowledge graph dataset of wikidata's revision history, 2021. URL https://arxiv.org/ abs/2112.05003 . · arXiv
  17. Shao, Z., Wang, P., Zhu, Q., Xu, R., Song, J., Bi, X., Zhang, H., Zhang, M., Li, Y. K., Wu, Y., and Guo, D. Deepseekmath: Pushing the limits of mathematical reasoning in open language models, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.03300 . · arXiv
  18. Sheng, G., Zhang, C., Ye, Z., Wu, X., Zhang, W., Zhang, R., Peng, Y., Lin, H., and Wu, C. Hybridflow: A flexible and efficient rlhf framework. In Proceedings of the Twentieth European Conference on Computer Systems , EuroSys '25, pp. 1279-1297. ACM, March 2025. doi: 10.1145/ 3689031.3696075. URL http://dx.doi.org/10. 1145/3689031.3696075 .
  19. Shi, Z., Chen, Y., Li, H., Sun, W., Ni, S., Lyu, Y ., Fan, R.-Z., Jin, B., Weng, Y., Zhu, M., Xie, Q., Guo, X., Yang, Q., Wu, J., Zhao, J., Tang, X., Ma, X., Wang, C., Mao, J., Ai, Q., Huang, J.-T., Wang, W., Zhang, Y., Yang, Y., Tu, Z., and Ren, Z. Deep research: A systematic survey, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.02038 . · arXiv
  20. Sun, W., Lu, M., Ling, Z., Liu, K., Yao, X., Yang, Y., and Chen, J. Scaling long-horizon llm agent via contextfolding, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2510.11967 .
  21. Tao, Z., Wu, J., Yin, W., Zhang, J., Li, B., Shen, H., Li, K., Zhang, L., Wang, X., Jiang, Y., Xie, P., Huang, F., and Zhou, J. Webshaper: Agentically data synthesizing via information-seeking formalization, 2025. URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/2507.15061 .
  22. Team, T. D., Li, B., Zhang, B., Zhang, D., Huang, F., Li, G., Chen, G., Yin, H., Wu, J., Zhou, J., et al. Tongyi deepresearch technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.24701 , 2025. · arXiv
  23. Wei, J., Sun, Z., Papay, S., McKinney, S., Han, J., Fulford, I., Chung, H. W., Passos, A. T., Fedus, W., and Glaese, A. Browsecomp: A simple yet challenging benchmark for browsing agents, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/ abs/2504.12516 . · arXiv
  24. Wong, R., Wang, J., Zhao, J., Chen, L., Gao, Y., Zhang, L., Zhou, X., Wang, Z., Xiang, K., Zhang, G., Huang, W., Wang, Y., and Wang, K. Widesearch: Benchmarking agentic broad info-seeking, 2025. URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/2508.07999 .
  25. Wu, J., Li, B., Fang, R., Yin, W., Zhang, L., Tao, Z., Zhang, D., Xi, Z., Fu, G., Jiang, Y ., et al. Webdancer: Towards autonomous information seeking agency. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.22648 , 2025a. · arXiv
  26. Wu, J., Yin, W., Jiang, Y., Wang, Z., Xi, Z., Fang, R., Zhang, L., He, Y., Zhou, D., Xie, P., et al. Webwalker: Benchmarking llms in web traversal. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.07572 , 2025b. · arXiv
  27. Xia, T., Ding, L., Wan, G., Zhan, Y., Du, B., and Tao, D. Improving complex reasoning over knowledge graph with logic-aware curriculum tuning. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume 39, pp. 12881-12889, 2025.
  28. Datasets and Benchmarks Track , 2024. URL https: //openreview.net/forum?id=tN61DTr4Ed . https://openreview.net/forum?id=tN61DTr4Ed
  29. Xin, H., Guo, D., Shao, Z., Ren, Z., Zhu, Q., Liu, B., Ruan, C., Li, W., and Liang, X. Deepseek-prover: Advancing theorem proving in llms through large-scale synthetic data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.14333 , 2024. · arXiv
  30. Yang, A., Li, A., Yang, B., Zhang, B., Hui, B., Zheng, B., Yu, B., Gao, C., Huang, C., Lv, C., Zheng, C., Liu, D., Zhou, F., Huang, F., Hu, F., Ge, H., Wei, H., Lin, H., Tang, J., Yang, J., Tu, J., Zhang, J., Yang, J., Yang, J., Zhou, J., Zhou, J., Lin, J., Dang, K., Bao, K., Yang, K., Yu, L., Deng, L., Li, M., Xue, M., Li, M., Zhang, P., Wang, P., Zhu, Q., Men, R., Gao, R., Liu, S., Luo, S., Li, T., Tang, T., Yin, W., Ren, X., Wang, X., Zhang, X., Ren, X., Fan, Y., Su, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., Wan, Y., Liu, Y., Wang, Z., Cui, Z., Zhang, Z., Zhou, Z., and Qiu, Z. Qwen3 technical report, 2025. URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/2505.09388 .

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • WANDR: A Benchmark for Wide and Deep Research

    Polshkov, V., Pitera, M., Yang, J., Priemko, K., Gaiduk, M., Nikolenko, A., Bykov, D., Southern, C., Yarats, D., & Ma, J. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.14747

    “WideSeekBench [Huang et al., 2026] uses a multi-stage generation and quality-control pipeline to produce table-completion tasks with varied target volumes and logical constraints.”

Authors
Huang, Z., Ren, H., Yuan, X., Wang, J., Jiang, Z., Xu, K., He, S., Zhao, J., & Liu, K.
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2026
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2602.02636
arXiv
2602.02636
OpenAlex
W7127706655
Cited by
0
References
0
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web Data Mining and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
Keywords
multi-agent systems, search breadth, information seeking, benchmark design, end-to-end reinforcement learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review