PreprintCited by 1Web Data Mining and AnalysisInformation Retrieval and Search BehaviorTopic Modeling

WANDR: A Benchmark for Wide and Deep Research

Open access
Polshkov, Vitaliy, Pitera, Marcin, Yang, Jeremy, Priemko, Kirill, Gaiduk, Maksim, Nikolenko, Aleksandr, Bykov, Denis, Southern, Clare +2 more·2026·arXiv

Abstract

WANDR (Wide ANd Deep Research) is a benchmark of 500 realistic, challenging data-collection tasks for research agents. Each task requires a system to discover a large set of entities that satisfy specified criteria (breadth), investigate each entity through multiple coordinated web searches (depth), and return independently verifiable records with supporting sources and excerpts. Tasks are represented as qualification key hierarchies that specify the entities, relationships, evidence, and required count at each level; a hierarchy with n companies, m employees per company, and k sources per employee requires n x m x k records. This structure supports diverse workflows such as market mapping, due diligence, literature review, product comparison, and talent sourcing, with targets ranging from dozens to thousands of records. WANDR replaces static gold answer sets with task-specific judges that refetch cited pages and verify each record against its evidence, allowing evaluation of current and changing facts. Record verdicts are aggregated into soft and hard precision, recall, and F1 scores that distinguish factual quality, coverage, and hierarchical completeness. The tasks are derived from de-identified product-usage logs and produced through a semi-automated pipeline with automated checks, empirical audits, and human review where needed. We evaluate six production research systems and find that the benchmark is far from saturated: at high effort, the strongest system reaches only 0.363 soft F1 and 0.133 hard F1. Performance degrades as target volume and hierarchy depth increase, with incomplete discovery, missing enrichment, and incomplete evidence construction remaining major bottlenecks. The benchmark and evaluation harness are available at https://github.com/perplexityai/wandr.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

WANDR is a 500-task benchmark for wide-and-deep agentic data collection, requiring systems to discover large sets of entities and verify per-entity facts against cited web pages. The strongest evaluated system reaches only 0.363 soft F1 and 0.133 hard F1, leaving the benchmark far from saturated.

Key findings

  • The benchmark is unsaturated: Perplexity Search as Code leads at 0.363 soft F1 and 0.133 hard F1; Anthropic follows at 0.249 soft F1 and 0.072 hard F1, while the remaining systems reach at most 0.121 soft F1 and 0.035 hard F1.
  • Required scale is high: medians are 100 members, 3.00 records per member, and 245 records per task; 4.4% of tasks require at least 1,000 records, and the full set totals 170,495 records across 13 vertical labels (mean 1.50 labels per task).
  • Failures compound: soft recall is below soft precision for every system, hard scores fall far below soft scores, and 33.6%–68.3% of records cite a page that does not satisfy every substantive task requirement.
  • Evidence rendering is a bottleneck: after conditioning on a page that satisfies all requirements and on faithful excerpts, complete support for all requirements is only 55.6%–80.4% across systems.

Methods

  • Tasks are produced by a semi-automated four-stage pipeline: seeding from de-identified product-usage logs, author-critic authoring, admission with feasibility and judge audits plus optional human review, and curation into 500 self-contained packages.
  • Each task is represented as a qualification key hierarchy such as company(n) → employee(m) → url(k), ending in URLs; a record is the atomic graded unit {item, url, excerpts, answer}, and counts apply recursively beneath each parent.
  • Six production systems (Perplexity, Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, Parallel, Exa) are evaluated on all 500 tasks and on a 45-task effort sweep; a task-specific judge re-fetches cited pages, emits full and retrieval-only verdicts, and aggregates soft and hard precision, recall, and F1 as unweighted per-task means.

Limitations

  • The paper states that the 500 tasks are not a random sample of all research work; admission favors high-volume, feasible, discriminative tasks with independently verifiable web evidence, so the score distribution should not be read as deployment difficulty.
  • The paper states that the main evaluation uses one production run per system, so run-to-run variance is not estimated, and systems differ simultaneously in model, search infrastructure, agent harness, tool interface, and provider-side implementation, making the ranking observational.
  • The paper states that reference-free grading introduces judge and retrieval uncertainty, including page drift, extraction omissions, and canonicalization/deduplication boundary decisions; the grading fetch backend is shared with the Perplexity solver, which may confer some alignment advantage, though ablations show scores decrease for every system while ranking remains mostly stable.
  • Evident from the text: the failure analysis is observational and does not isolate causal mechanisms, and target volume, hierarchy levels, content, and difficulty co-vary, so scale sensitivity is descriptive rather than controlled.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2608.14747

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

16 of 20 cited sources checked · 8 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Findingcitation

    Premature stopping occurs in production agent runs, characterized by giving up after an initial search yields insufficient information.

    “premature stopping (giving up after an initial search yields insufficient information) [Wong et al., 2025]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wong et al., 2025 source

      Section 5.1 (p. 14) reports that agents tend to abandon a search after an initial attempt returns no results or insufficient information. This supports the description of premature stopping, but the passage concerns agents analyzed in WideSearch; it does not establish that the behavior occurs in production agent runs. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingcitation

    Context overflow occurs in production agent runs, characterized by long search trajectories exhausting the available context.

    “context overflow (long search trajectories exhausting the available context) [Lan et al., 2025]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lan et al., 2025 source

      The Error Analysis (p. 10) identifies context overflow in DeepWideSearch agent evaluations: multi-step reasoning and numerous search calls expand context beyond current agents’ management capabilities. It does not establish that this occurred in production runs; the Efficiency Analysis (p. 9) instead discusses real-world deployment as a future scalability challenge. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingnone given

    WANDR tasks are derived from de-identified product-usage logs.

    “Tasks are derived from de-identified product-usage logs”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The de-identified product-usage logs are a representative and valid source for deriving benchmark tasks that reflect professional knowledge work.
  • Findingnone given

    WANDR is a benchmark of 500 realistic and challenging agentic data-collection tasks for knowledge work.

    “WANDR (Wide ANd Deep Research) is a benchmark of 500 realistic and challenging agentic data-collection tasks for knowledge work.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingnone given

    Required record counts in WANDR range from dozens to thousands.

    “Required record counts range from dozens to thousands”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 180
  • May combine two claims. 142
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingcitation

    Snippet reliance occurs in production agent runs, characterized by using a search-result snippet without validating that its source supports the submitted claim.

    “snippet reliance (using a search-result snippet without validating that its source supports the submitted claim) [Wong et al., 2025]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wong et al., 2025 source

      Section 5.1 (p. 14) identifies failure to validate a retrieved source’s context and relevance as an agent error. Appendix E (p. 25) gives an example in which an agent used a search-result snippet about the University of Houston to answer a question about Harvard. The example comes from benchmark agent trajectories, however, not production runs. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Volume collapse occurs in production agent runs, characterized by incomplete query decomposition and insufficient retrieval at scale, sometimes followed by hallucinated values.

    “volume collapse (incomplete query decomposition and insufficient retrieval at scale, sometimes followed by hallucinated values) [Lan et al., 2025, Wong et al., 2025]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Lan et al., 2025 source

      The Error Analysis (p. 10) reports insufficient retrieval and agents filling tables from internal knowledge instead of web queries, producing outdated or inaccurate information. It does not identify a failure mode called “volume collapse” or establish incomplete query decomposition, and its evidence comes from benchmark tasks rather than production agent runs. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Wong et al., 2025 source

      Section 5.1 (pp. 13–14) identifies incomplete query decomposition and inadequate recall in large-scale searches, and reports that failed retrieval can be followed by fabricated or incorrect facts. The paper establishes these patterns in benchmarked agent runs, not production runs; it does not establish the claim's production setting. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    This is roughly one sixth of WideSearch's reported 2.33-hour average for one human completion; that study additionally used two independent annotators per task [Wong et al., 2025].

    “This is roughly one sixth of WideSearch's reported 2.33-hour average for one human completion; that study additionally used two independent annotators per task [Wong et al., 2025].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wong et al., 2025 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    WANDR is the breadth-oriented counterpart to DRACO.

    “WANDR is the breadth-oriented counterpart to DRACO.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zhong et al., 2026 source

      The Abstract (p. 1) describes DRACO, and Related Work (p. 2) compares it with other deep-research benchmarks, but neither identifies WANDR as its breadth-oriented counterpart. A search of our copy for “WANDR” found no passage addressing that relationship. (LLM, conf=0.72)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    DeepSearchQA includes both single-and set-valued answers, graded against gold answer sets.

    “DeepSearchQA [Gupta et al., 2026] includes both single-and set-valued answers, graded against gold answer sets.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gupta et al., 2026 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Closed-ended browsing and question-answering benchmarks stress depth or end-to-end task completion, but their compact, gold-answer-based outputs do not test repeated depth across a large collection of discovered entities.

    “These benchmarks stress depth or end-to-end task completion, but their compact, gold-answer-based outputs do not test repeated depth across a large collection of discovered entities.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Wei et al., 2025 source

      Section 2.4 says BrowseComp requires persistence and depth of browsing but sidesteps generating long answers. The Abstract and Section 2 describe short answers checked against reference answers. The paper does not specifically assess repeated depth across a large collection of discovered entities or characterize other benchmarks as testing end-to-end task completion. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Yoran et al., 2024 source
    • cites Liu et al., 2025 source

      The Introduction (p. 1) says many existing benchmarks seek a single fact and check only whether the final answer matches ground truth; §2.1 (p. 3) also describes multi-hop benchmarks and outcome-only verification. Those passages support the contrast with compact, gold-answer-based outputs, but they do not specifically say that prior benchmarks fail to test repeated depth across a large collection of discovered entities. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    WideSeekBench uses a multi-stage generation and quality-control pipeline to produce table-completion tasks with varied target volumes and logical constraints.

    “WideSeekBench [Huang et al., 2026] uses a multi-stage generation and quality-control pipeline to produce table-completion tasks with varied target volumes and logical constraints.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Huang et al., 2026 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    WideSearch also sources tasks from real user queries and grades populated tables cell by cell, but primarily tests broad collection with comparatively shallow per-item fields.

    “WideSearch [Wong et al., 2025] also sources tasks from real user queries and grades populated tables cell by cell, but primarily tests broad collection with comparatively shallow per-item fields.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wong et al., 2025 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    GISA spans item-, set-, list-, and table-valued answers and maintains a live subset through periodically updated answers.

    “GISA [Zhu et al., 2026] spans item-, set-, list-, and table-valued answers and maintains a live subset through periodically updated answers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zhu et al., 2026 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    DeepWideSearch explicitly combines depth and width, converting 220 tasks from existing deep-and wide-search datasets and grading against human-verified ground-truth tables.

    “Most similar to WANDR, DeepWideSearch [Lan et al., 2025] explicitly combines depth and width, converting 220 tasks from existing deep-and wide-search datasets and grading against human-verified ground-truth tables.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lan et al., 2025 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    Seed mining follows the de-identification methodology of the DRACO benchmark: requests are sampled from a de-identified pool and reworded to remove identifying details.

    “First, seed mining follows the de-identification methodology of the DRACO benchmark[Zhong et al., 2026]: requests are sampled from a de-identified pool and reworded to remove identifying details.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zhong et al., 2026 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    WANDR tasks are produced by a semi-automated pipeline.

    “produced by a semi-automated pipeline.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Each WANDR task asks a system to discover a large collection of members satisfying specified criteria (the wide axis) and establish specific facts about each member through orchestrated web searches (the deep axis).

    “Each task asks a system to discover a large collection of members satisfying specified criteria (the wide axis) and establish specific facts about each member through orchestrated web searches (the deep axis).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingown data

    Research agents are increasingly asked to produce structured collections of facts, each requiring in-depth search to establish.

    “Research agents are increasingly asked to produce not only a single answer or free-form report, but also a structured collection of facts, each requiring in-depth search to establish.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingnone given

    WANDR tasks require dozens to thousands of records.

    “WANDR tasks require dozens to thousands of such records.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    WANDR originated as an internal benchmark designed to distinguish systems by how well they avoid the recurring failure modes.

    “WANDR originated as an internal benchmark designed to distinguish systems by how well they avoid these failure modes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingnone given

    On the deep axis, the agent must enrich each entity through multiple orchestrated web searches.

    “On the deep axis, it must enrich each entity through multiple orchestrated web searches.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    A flat list and a fixed-schema table are both special cases of the qualification key hierarchy.

    “A flat list and a fixed-schema table are both special cases of the qualification key hierarchy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    On the wide axis, the agent usually must discover a large set of entities not supplied in advance; some tasks instead specify a closed roster and require complete coverage.

    “On the wide axis, the agent usually must discover a large set of entities not supplied in advance; some tasks instead specify a closed roster and require complete coverage.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    Seeding identifies requests with a wide-research shape in de-identified product-usage logs.

    “Seeding identifies requests with a wide-research shape in de-identified product-usage logs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The de-identified product-usage logs are a representative and valid source for deriving benchmark tasks that reflect professional knowledge work.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    The WANDR pipeline can also create sibling variants by holding most of the hierarchy fixed while changing one controlled choice: a volume, time window, eligibility rule, or evidence bar.

    “The pipeline can also create sibling variants by holding most of the hierarchy fixed while changing one controlled choice: a volume, time window, eligibility rule, or evidence bar.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    WANDR makes width-depth composition the scored object: every member must be discovered, enriched, and independently evidenced.

    “WANDR instead makes that width-depth composition the scored object: every member must be discovered, enriched, and independently evidenced.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning

    Because the pipeline deliberately overproduces, passing every check does not guarantee inclusion.

    “Because the pipeline deliberately overproduces, passing every check does not guarantee inclusion.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    WANDR tasks are produced by a semi-automated pipeline with four stages: seeding, iterative authoring, admission into a candidate pool, and curation into the released set.

    “Tasks are produced by a semi-automated pipeline with four stages: seeding, iterative authoring, admission into a candidate pool, and curation into the released set (Figure 3).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    Each released WANDR task ships as a self-contained package with its solver-facing task, verifier, fixtures, and labels.

    “Each released task ships as a self-contained package with its solver-facing task, verifier, fixtures, and labels.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The mean is 1.50 labels per task.

    “The mean is 1.50 labels per task.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingnone given

    WANDR represents the repeated wide-and-deep structure flexibly as a tree.

    “WANDR represents this repeated structure flexibly as a tree.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    A single WANDR hierarchy can combine nesting, fan-out, fixed dispatch labels, and multiple-source requirements, while subtasks add further branches at any shared key.

    “A single hierarchy can combine nesting, fan-out, fixed dispatch labels, and multiple-source requirements, while subtasks add further branches at any shared key.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Each task has one to four labels: 294 tasks (58.8%) have one label, and 206 (41.2%) span multiple verticals.

    “Each task has one to four labels: 294 tasks (58.8%) have one label, and 206 (41.2%) span multiple verticals.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Relative to existing collection benchmarks, WANDR adds evidence-backed records, reference-free verification, and a compositional task structure: qualification key hierarchies in which discovery and per-entity enrichment form flexible trees rather than a single flat table.

    “Relative to existing collection benchmarks, WANDR adds evidence-backed records, reference-free verification, and a compositional task structure: qualification key hierarchies in which discovery and per-entity enrichment form flexible trees rather than a single flat table.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    A fourth pattern is multi-condition research, in which every candidate must satisfy several conditions, often supported by different pages or source types.

    “A fourth pattern is multi-condition research, in which every candidate must satisfy several conditions, often supported by different pages or source types.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    WANDR differs from DeepWideSearch in task shape and grading: its requests require wide-then-deep search to be repeated within one hierarchy, rather than combining separately sourced deep and wide task patterns; its grading verifies claims against submitted sources rather than relying on a gold solution.

    “WANDR differs in task shape and grading: its requests require wide-then-deep search to be repeated within one hierarchy, rather than combining separately sourced deep and wide task patterns; its grading verifies claims against submitted sources rather than relying on a gold solution.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The release spans 13 vertical labels (Table 2).

    “The release spans 13 vertical labels (Table 2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The medians are 100 members, 3.00 records per member, and 245 records per task, respectively.

    “The medians are 100 members, 3.00 records per member, and 245 records per task, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    The output of the WANDR pipeline is 500 public task packages; system grading is a separate process.

    “The output is 500 public task packages; system grading is a separate process (Section 5).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The number of hierarchy levels counts distinct non-member, non-URL keys across the root and all subtasks: 12.8% of tasks have none, 45.0% have one, 31.6% have two, and 10.6% have three or more.

    “The number of hierarchy levels counts distinct non-member, non-URL keys across the root and all subtasks: 12.8% of tasks have none, 45.0% have one, 31.6% have two, and 10.6% have three or more.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Required volume is below 100 records for 10.8% of tasks, 100-299 for 44.4%, 300-999 for 40.4%, and at least 1,000 for 4.4%; across all tasks, the total is 170,495 records.

    “Required volume is below 100 records for 10.8% of tasks, 100-299 for 44.4%, 300-999 for 40.4%, and at least 1,000 for 4.4%; across all tasks, the total is 170,495 records.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The number of hierarchy levels is not interchangeable with records per member: tasks with one, two, or at least three hierarchy levels all have a median of 3.00 records per member, while flat tasks have a median of 1.00.

    “The number of hierarchy levels is not interchangeable with records per member: tasks with one, two, or at least three hierarchy levels all have a median of 3.00 records per member, while flat tasks have a median of 1.00.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Across admission and curation, optional human work is budgeted at about 20 minutes per released task-approximately 15 minutes for rubric sign-off and 5 minutes for labeling-plus a roughly five-minute feasibility review for tasks that cannot be settled from merged rollouts.

    “Across admission and curation, optional human work is budgeted at about 20 minutes per released task-approximately 15 minutes for rubric sign-off and 5 minutes for labeling-plus a roughly five-minute feasibility review for tasks that cannot be settled from merged rollouts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingreasoning

    The structural variations in WANDR are building blocks, not mutually exclusive task classes.

    “These variations are building blocks, not mutually exclusive task classes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Perplexity has duplicate identities on only 4.8% of tasks, below Gemini, Exa, OpenAI, and Parallel, but it has both the largest collapsed-value share (0.426%) and the largest conditional soft-recall loss (4.52 points).

    “Perplexity has duplicate identities on only 4.8% of tasks, below Gemini, Exa, OpenAI, and Parallel, but it has both the largest collapsed-value share (0.426%) and the largest conditional soft-recall loss (4.52 points).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Gemini is usually faithful but has the weakest complete support once faithful.

    “Gemini is usually faithful but has the weakest complete support once faithful”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Once an excerpt is faithful, it supports at least one requirement on 96.9%-99.4% of records, but supports every requirement on only 55.6%-80.4%.

    “Once an excerpt is faithful, it supports something on 96.9%-99.4% of records, but supports every requirement on only 55.6%-80.4%.”
    • Also stated in: § 7.1 Summary · plain
      “Within evidence rendering, the dominant signature is partial proof: faithful excerpts usually support at least one requirement but often not all of them.”
    • Also stated in: § 7.1 Summary · plain
      “even for Perplexity only 80.4% of faithful excerpts completely support the claim after conditioning on a page that does.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Identity disambiguation has little aggregate effect but can cost several full soft-recall points on affected submissions.

    “Identity disambiguation has little aggregate effect but can cost several full soft-recall points on affected submissions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Gemini has high faithfulness (79.1%) but the weakest complete support (55.6%).

    “Gemini has high faithfulness (79.1%) but the weakest complete support (55.6%; Table 9).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    The mean full soft-recall effect is therefore small, 0.017-0.127 percentage points, but rises to 0.77-4.52 points when collapse changes a task's score.

    “The mean full soft-recall effect is therefore small, 0.017-0.127percentage points, but rises to 0.77-4.52 points when collapse changes a task's score.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Perplexity, Gemini, and Exa improve monotonically in soft and hard F1 across their available settings; Perplexity xhigh reaches 0.447 soft F1 and 0.224 hard F1.

    “Perplexity, Gemini, and Exa improve monotonically in soft and hard F1 across their available settings; Perplexity xhigh reaches 0.447 soft F1 and 0.224 hard F1.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Parallel has the highest identity-affected task share, although its diagnostic coverage is limited to 350 tasks.

    “Parallel has the highest identity-affected task share, although its diagnostic coverage is limited to 350 tasks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    OpenAI illustrates the converse: it retains 83.9% through discovery, then loses 68.2% of the remainder during enrichment, making enrichment 64.7% of its total loss (Figure 9).

    “OpenAI illustrates the converse: it retains 83.9% through discovery, then loses 68.2% of the remainder during enrichment, making enrichment 64.7% of its total loss (Figure 9).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    SaC leads every hard metric, but coordinated identity, qualification, and rendering failures still prevent full-member completion (Table 4).

    “SaC leads every hard metric, but coordinated identity, qualification, and rendering failures still prevent full-member completion (Table 4).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Unlike target volume, additional levels reduce both precision and recall conversion for every system, by 33.7 and 35.3 percentage points on average from the shallowest to deepest bin.

    “Unlike target volume, additional levels reduce both precision and recall conversion for every system, by 33.7 and 35.3 percentage points on average from the shallowest to deepest bin.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Manual inspection matches the pattern: failures omit a date from a ranking page, air-burden language from a permit, or an individual review from a long review surface even when the selected text is faithful and partly relevant.

    “Manual inspection matches the pattern: failures omit a date from a ranking page, air-burden language from a permit, or an individual review from a long review surface even when the selected text is faithful and partly relevant.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The stage decomposition localizes the largest share of soft-recall loss to enrichment for Perplexity, Anthropic, and OpenAI, but to discovery for Gemini, Parallel, and Exa.

    “The stage decomposition localizes the largest share of soft-recall loss to enrichment for Perplexity, Anthropic, and OpenAI, but to discovery for Gemini, Parallel, and Exa.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    OpenAI and Exa cost about $0.50 per task, and Exa is fastest at a 5.3-minute median, but the remaining systems reach at most 0.121 soft F1 and 0.035 hard F1.

    “OpenAI and Exa cost about $0.50 per task, and Exa is fastest at a 5.3-minute median, but the remaining systems reach at most 0.121 soft F1 and 0.035 hard F1.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    OpenAI has low faithfulness (57.1%) but relatively strong completion once faithful (75.7%).

    “OpenAI has low faithfulness (57.1%) but relatively strong completion once faithful (75.7%)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Perplexity combines the strongest breadth retention with the highest conditional evidence completion.

    “Perplexity combines the strongest breadth retention with the highest conditional evidence completion”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The benchmark remains unsaturated: the highest mean task-level hard precision and recall are only 0.150 and 0.134, corresponding to complete credit for roughly one in seven submitted members and one in seven required members, respectively, under the benchmark's task-level averaging.

    “The benchmark remains unsaturated: the highest mean task-level hard precision and recall are only 0.150 and 0.134, corresponding to complete credit for roughly one in seven submitted members and one in seven required members, respectively, under the benchmark's task-level averaging.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Across systems, only 2.4%-8.0% of tasks contain a duplicate entity identity, and only 0.018%-0.426% of submitted entity values collapse.

    “Across systems, only 2.4%-8.0% of tasks contain a duplicate entity identity, and only 0.018%-0.426% of submitted entity values collapse.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Perplexity falls from 0.363 soft F1 to 0.133 hard F1, Anthropic from 0.249 to 0.072, and the remaining systems from 0.055-0.121 to 0.009-0.035.

    “Perplexity falls from 0.363 soft F1 to 0.133 hard F1, Anthropic from 0.249 to 0.072, and the remaining systems from 0.055-0.121to 0.009-0.035.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    The loss also appears in precision-0.389 to 0.150 for Perplexity and 0.354 to 0.137 for Anthropic-so many submitted members are only partially complete.

    “The loss also appears in precision-0.389to 0.150 for Perplexity and 0.354 to 0.137 for Anthropic-so many submitted members are only partially complete.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Resource use does not explain a common scaling response: Anthropic's latency, cost, and token use rise sharply, but Perplexity's token use falls from 4.87M to 2.95M and OpenAI's remains near 0.17M (Figure 10, top block).

    “Resource use does not explain a common scaling response: Anthropic's latency, cost, and token use rise sharply, but Perplexity's token use falls from 4.87M to 2.95M and OpenAI's remains near 0.17M (Figure 10, top block).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Perplexity leads at 0.363 soft F1 and 0.133 hard F1 with midrange cost ($5.20 per task, 14.9-minute median latency, and 3.82M total reported tokens per task).

    “Perplexity leads at 0.363 soft F1 and 0.133 hard F1 with midrange cost ($5.20 per task, 14.9-minute median latency, and 3.82M total reported tokens per task).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Full-to-retrieval conversion weakens less consistently: the first-to-last decline averages 10.4 percentage points for precision and 13.7 for recall across systems, while Gemini's precision conversion rises.

    “Full-to-retrieval conversion weakens less consistently: the first-to-last decline averages 10.4 percentage points for precision and 13.7 for recall across systems, while Gemini's precision conversion rises.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Perplexity retains 0.357 recall from 0.389 precision, the smallest gap; Anthropic falls from 0.354 to 0.222, the largest.

    “Perplexity retains 0.357 recall from 0.389 precision, the smallest gap; Anthropic falls from 0.354 to 0.222, the largest.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Late extraction cliffs do not dominate total loss Extraction removes 30.9%-72.9% of the score that reaches it, yet contributes only 7.0%-25.3% of total loss and is the smallest component for five systems.

    “Late extraction cliffs do not dominate total loss Extraction removes 30.9%-72.9% of the score that reaches it, yet contributes only 7.0%-25.3% of total loss and is the smallest component for five systems.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Exa and Parallel do not expose token counts.

    “Exa and Parallel do not expose token counts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    From zero to three or more hierarchy levels, Perplexity's retrieval-only hard precision falls from 0.578 to 0.105 and hard recall from 0.523 to 0.072; Anthropic falls from 0.551 to 0.141 and from 0.407 to 0.074; and OpenAI falls from 0.263 to 0.059 and from 0.215 to 0.051.

    “From zero to three or more hierarchy levels, Perplexity's retrieval-only hard precision falls from 0.578 to 0.105 and hard recall from 0.523 to 0.072; Anthropic falls from 0.551 to 0.141 and from 0.407 to 0.074; and OpenAI falls from 0.263 to 0.059 and from 0.215 to 0.051.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Anthropic ranks second (0.249, 0.072) but has the highest cost, latency, and token use.

    “Anthropic ranks second (0.249, 0.072) but has the highest cost, latency, and token use.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    From the smallest to largest required-volume bin, retrieval-only hard recall falls from 0.376 to 0.172 for Perplexity, 0.267 to 0.117 for Anthropic, and 0.191 to 0.056 for OpenAI.

    “From the smallest to largest required-volume bin, retrieval-only hard recall falls from 0.376 to 0.172 for Perplexity, 0.267 to 0.117 for Anthropic, and 0.191 to 0.056 for OpenAI.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingown data

    We evaluate six production systems with different search and orchestration interfaces (Table 3).

    “We evaluate six production systems with different search and orchestration interfaces (Table 3).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    OpenAI peaks at high, while Parallel's soft F1 rises through ultra8x but its hard F1 dips slightly between ultra2x and ultra4x.

    “OpenAI peaks at high, while Parallel's soft F1 rises through ultra8x but its hard F1 dips slightly between ultra2x and ultra4x.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    The released task packages include the production implementation.

    “The released task packages include the production implementation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    Complete package files, prompts, fixtures, and verifier code live in the public repository.

    “Complete package files, prompts, fixtures, and verifier code live in the public repository.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The page-length analysis covers 7,193 of 7,339 page-satisfied records with joined content.

    “The page-length analysis covers 7,193 of 7,339 page-satisfied records with joined content.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Detached marginal strips retain the exact-zero cases: 24 tasks for discovery, one for enrichment, and none for both.

    “Detached marginal strips retain the exact-zero cases: 24 tasks for discovery, one for enrichment, and none for both.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The task-ontology view measures where structured completion becomes difficult; the individual-citation view measures source reuse and diversity; and the trajectory view measures exploration and effort.

    “The task-ontology view measures where structured completion becomes difficult; the individual-citation view measures source reuse and diversity; and the trajectory view measures exploration and effort.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The submission covers the three countries at deliberately varied levels of completeness and obtains soft F1 0.57 and hard F1 0.33.

    “The submission covers the three countries at deliberately varied levels of completeness and obtains soft F1 0.57 and hard F1 0.33”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The Turkey subtree isolates the two identity effects summarized in Table 8: duplicate collapse reduces the distinct count, and take-worst can lower the retained cluster score before canonical identities match main-task and subtask evidence branches.

    “The Turkey subtree isolates the two identity effects summarized in Table 8: duplicate collapse reduces the distinct count, and take-worst can lower the retained cluster score before canonical identities match main-task and subtask evidence branches.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Historical rollouts accreted as tasks were authored, validated, and hardened: authors used them to test feasibility, critics inspected them for shortcuts and ambiguous obligations, and reviewers used them to decide whether a task needed another revision.

    “Historical rollouts accreted as tasks were authored, validated, and hardened: authors used them to test feasibility, critics inspected them for shortcuts and ambiguous obligations, and reviewers used them to decide whether a task needed another revision.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Domain dispersion varies largely independently of scale: its median is 53.4%, while the 5th and 95th percentiles are 5.0% and 86.9%.

    “Domain dispersion varies largely independently of scale: its median is 53.4%, while the 5th and 95th percentiles are 5.0% and 86.9%.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning

    The worldwide-sporting-event subtask fails because its evidence concerns a continental final, so multiplicative composition sets the country score to zero.

    “The worldwide-sporting-event subtask also fails because its evidence concerns a continental final, so multiplicative composition sets the country score to zero.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The median is 1.97 effective records per member, with the central 90% of tasks spanning 0.73-5.92.

    “The median is 1.97 effective records per member, with the central 90% of tasks spanning 0.73-5.92.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The initial condition is observed on 494, 499, 489, 476, 341, and 473 tasks in displayed order; the conditional columns have 488, 497, 464, 470, 336, and 457 tasks with at least one faithful record.

    “The initial condition is observed on 494, 499, 489, 476, 341, and 473 tasks in displayed order; the conditional columns have 488, 497, 464, 470, 336, and 457 tasks with at least one faithful record.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    An earlier, separately configured evaluation reported the same qualitative ordering, but it also used one run per system and therefore does not estimate run-to-run variance.

    “An earlier, separately configured evaluation reported the same qualitative ordering [Perplexity, 2026], but it also used one run per system and therefore does not estimate run-to-run variance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [Perplexity, 2026]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    France is complete, India receives partial credit, and Turkey fails a required subtask in the toy composite task.

    “France is complete, India receives partial credit, and Turkey fails a required subtask, yielding soft F1 0.57 and hard F1 0.33.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In internal grading ablations that disable the agentic fetch backend and use only the browser, scores decrease for every system while the ranking remains mostly stable.

    “In internal grading ablations that disable the agentic fetch backend and use only the browser, scores decrease for every system while the ranking remains mostly stable.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    We aggregate the historical rollout archive to characterize WANDR empirically at three resolutions: task-ontology, individual-citation, and trajectory views.

    “We aggregate that archive to characterize WANDR empirically at three resolutions.The task-ontology view measures where structured completion becomes difficult; the individual-citation view measures source reuse and diversity; and the trajectory view measures exploration and effort.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    A small endpoint-level correction (0.01%-0.31%) reconciles the reconstructed product with reported full soft recall; restoring the identity effect in Table 8 then reproduces the reported score exactly.

    “A small endpoint-level correction (0.01%-0.31%) reconciles the reconstructed product with reported full soft recall; restoring the identity effect in Table8then reproduces the reported score exactly.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The toy composite task yields soft F1 0.57 and hard F1 0.33.

    “France is complete, India receives partial credit, and Turkey fails a required subtask, yielding soft F1 0.57 and hard F1 0.33.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    Each released WANDR task is a self-contained package.

    “Each released WANDR task is a self-contained package.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Delhi supplies one of two required heritage sites, so zero-padding leaves soft recall at 0.5 while soft precision remains 1.

    “Delhi supplies one of two required heritage sites, so zero-padding leaves soft recall at 0.5 while soft precision remains 1.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The median retained trajectory surfaces 496 unique URLs, while the median task mean cost is $4.00.

    “The median retained trajectory surfaces 496 unique URLs, while the median task mean cost is $4.00.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The pipeline can produce new tasks and controlled siblings across domains, hierarchy shapes, evidence requirements, traps, and breadth/depth settings, while curation steers the resulting distribution.

    “It can produce new tasks and controlled siblings across domains, hierarchy shapes, evidence requirements, traps, and breadth/depth settings, while curation steers the resulting distribution (Section 4).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingnone given

    WANDR is released primarily as an evaluation benchmark.

    “WANDR is released primarily as an evaluation benchmark.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Three cities are supplied for a required count of two; Bangalore's empty heritage subtask gives it a zero composed score, so it is excluded when recall retains the two highest-scoring cities.

    “Three cities are supplied for a required count of two; Bangalore's empty heritage subtask gives it a zero composed score, so it is excluded when recall retains the two highest-scoring cities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Output-token runs have lower soft F1 than file-delivery runs for Perplexity (0.397 versus 0.238), Anthropic (0.262 versus 0.202), and OpenAI (0.153 versus 0.122).

    “Output-token runs have lower soft F1 than file-delivery runs for Perplexity (0.397 versus 0.238), Anthropic (0.262 versus 0.202), and OpenAI (0.153 versus 0.122); hard F1 shows the same ordering (0.156 versus 0.121, 0.099 versus 0.080, and 0.073 versus 0.068).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Fetches are batched, and queue nodes use both in-memory request coalescing and persistent caches keyed to the smallest reusable unit.

    “Fetches are batched, and queue nodes use both in-memory request coalescing and persistent caches keyed to the smallest reusable unit.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    The output ablation compares solutions delivered through sandbox files, a file-sharing tool, or output tokens.

    “The output ablation compares solutions delivered through sandbox files, a file-sharing tool, or output tokens.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning

    At runtime, expensive grading remains record-local until canonicalization, deduplication, and score rollup.

    “At runtime, expensive grading remains record-local until canonicalization, deduplication, and score rollup.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Records citing the same URL can share one fetch result; identical triage, canonicalization, and judgment work can also be reused when task semantics and inputs match.

    “Records citing the same URL can share one fetch result; identical triage, canonicalization, and judgment work can also be reused when task semantics and inputs match.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    Reference-free verification avoids constructing and maintaining exhaustive gold collections.

    “Reference-free verification avoids constructing and maintaining exhaustive gold collections.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Each submitted record receives verdict_retrieval and verdict_full, and the score tree aggregates those verdicts by entity and hierarchy level into soft and hard precision, recall, and F1.

    “Each submitted record receives verdict_retrieval and verdict_full, and the score tree aggregates those verdicts by entity and hierarchy level into soft and hard precision, recall, and F1.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    France is fully complete: both qualifying cities have two heritage sites, and both country-level subtasks pass. All displayed precision and recall values equal one.

    “France is fully complete: both qualifying cities have two heritage sites, and both country-level subtasks pass.All displayed precision and recall values equal one.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The released grader accepts multiple task roots, flattens their records into one streaming queue graph, and executes fetch, triage, canonicalization, deduplication, and judgment with stage-specific concurrency.

    “The released grader accepts multiple task roots, flattens their records into one streaming queue graph, and executes fetch, triage, canonicalization, deduplication, and judgment with stage-specific concurrency.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    For RL-scale task supply, authoring and admission can run fully automatically, including feasibility and judge-quality gates; periodic human audits can monitor distribution drift without sitting on the generation path.

    “For RL-scale task supply, authoring and admission can run fully automatically, including feasibility and judge-quality gates; periodic human audits can monitor distribution drift without sitting on the generation path.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    Workload is explicit in each task's key hierarchy: every level declares a required count.

    “Workload is explicit in each task's key hierarchy: every level declares a required count.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Hard F1 shows the same ordering for Perplexity (0.156 versus 0.121), Anthropic (0.099 versus 0.080), and OpenAI (0.073 versus 0.068).

    “Output-token runs have lower soft F1 than file-delivery runs for Perplexity (0.397 versus 0.238), Anthropic (0.262 versus 0.202), and OpenAI (0.153 versus 0.122); hard F1 shows the same ordering (0.156 versus 0.121, 0.099 versus 0.080, and 0.073 versus 0.068).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingreasoning

    Holding the task's semantic criteria fixed while lowering one or more counts produces a smaller instance.

    “Holding the task's semantic criteria fixed while lowering one or more counts produces a smaller instance-for example, requiring 5 qualifying entities rather than 20, or one corroborating source rather than three-and the counts can be increased across epochs toward the full task.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Operational differences vary by system: output-token runs are slightly more expensive for Perplexity and OpenAI and less expensive per scheduled task for Anthropic, whose output-token run also produces fewer metric-bearing trials (42/45 versus 45/45).

    “Operational differences vary by system: output-token runs are slightly more expensive for Perplexity and OpenAI and less expensive per scheduled task for Anthropic, whose output-token run also produces fewer metric-bearing trials (42/45 versus 45/45).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Automated checks and empirical audits screen WANDR tasks, with human review where needed.

    “Automated checks and empirical audits screen them, with human review where needed”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    A task-specific judge re-fetches the cited pages and verifies each record's claims against the cited evidence.

    “a task-specific judge re-fetches the cited pages and verifies each record's claims against the cited evidence”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The central challenge of WANDR is to achieve the requested volume through broad search while keeping every record factually correct.

    “shifting the central challenge from finding a single correct answer or writing a polished report to open-ended discovery at high volume without sacrificing per-record factual correctness”
    • Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · plain
      “The central challenge is to achieve the requested volume through broad search while keeping every record factually correct.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Automated authoring checks, an empirical feasibility audit, and a judge audit establish the conditions needed for a functional WANDR task.

    “Automated authoring checks, an empirical feasibility audit, and a judge audit establish the conditions needed for a functional task.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Every WANDR record is a citation-backed claim (URL plus verbatim excerpts).

    “Every record is a citation-backed claim (URL plus verbatim excerpts).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    The final WANDR set is curated to stress-test recurring failure modes of frontier agentic search systems.

    “the final set is curated to stress-test recurring failure modes of frontier agentic search systems.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Failures can be localized across the WANDR tree: a system may fail to discover core task entities or members, enrich intermediate entities or keys, identify relevant pages, extract adequate evidence from those pages, or disambiguate identities when keys collide.

    “Failures can be localized across the tree: a system may fail to discover core task entities or members, enrich intermediate entities or keys, identify relevant pages, extract adequate evidence from those pages, or disambiguate identities when keys collide (Section 3).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Every admitted WANDR task must meet three top-level criteria: substantial volume (usually hundreds of records and sometimes thousands); feasibility (the requested volume is attainable); and difficulty and discrimination (simple internal baselines score low while stronger systems score meaningfully higher).

    “Every admitted task must meet three top-level criteria: substantial volume (usually hundreds of records and sometimes thousands); feasibility (the requested volume is attainable); and difficulty and discrimination (simple internal baselines score low while stronger systems score meaningfully higher).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    A task-specific judge re-fetches the cited page.

    “A task-specific judge re-fetches the cited page.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Optional human review improves WANDR task quality but is not required for the task package to run and grade submissions.

    “Optional human review improves task quality but is not required for the task package to run and grade submissions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Authoring uses an interleaved author-critic loop for design, task, and fixture drafts, plus a mechanical linter.

    “Authoring uses an interleaved author-critic loop for design, task, and fixture drafts, plus a mechanical linter.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Grading evaluates every submission against its own cited pages rather than against the witness.

    “It establishes that the requested volume is attainable, while grading still evaluates every submission against its own cited pages rather than against the witness.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The authoring stage claims seeds in batches under two controls: deduplication against previously used seeds and tasks, and coverage steering toward the target distributions, which favors diverse, economically useful domains and caps overrepresented or low-value ones.

    “The authoring stage claims seeds in batches under two controls: deduplication against previously used seeds and tasks, and coverage steering toward the target distributions, which favors diverse, economically useful domains and caps overrepresented or low-value ones.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    WANDR brings source verification to collection scale: every record must carry its own citation (URL plus verbatim excerpts), and a task-specific judge re-fetches the cited page and verifies the claim against it.

    “WANDR brings source verification to collection scale: every record must carry its own citation (URL plus verbatim excerpts), and a task-specific judge re-fetches the cited page and verifies the claim against it.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Admission applies a feasibility audit based on merged rollouts and a judge audit, followed by optional human sign-off against the four-axis rubric; automated runnability, cleanliness, difficulty, and discrimination gates are enforced during authoring.

    “Admission applies a feasibility audit based on merged rollouts and a judge audit, followed by optional human sign-off against the four-axis rubric; automated runnability, cleanliness, difficulty, and discrimination gates are enforced during authoring.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    During WANDR construction, outputs from the authoring rollouts are merged into a best-known solution that serves as an internal feasibility witness, not an answer key; grading never compares a submission against it.

    “During construction, outputs from the authoring rollouts are merged into a best-known solution that serves as an internal feasibility witness, not an answer key; grading never compares a submission against it.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Admission checks that the requested volume is attainable, audits the judge, and optionally adds human sign-off.

    “Admission checks that the requested volume is attainable, audits the judge, and optionally adds human sign-off.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    WANDR verdicts are aggregated into precision, recall, and F1, each in soft (partial credit) and hard (binary pass/fail) forms.

    “These verdicts are then aggregated into precision (accuracy among submitted members), recall (quality-adjusted completion relative to the required member count), and F1, each in soft (partial credit) and hard (binary pass/fail) forms (Section 5, Appendix A).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    A classifier then ranks candidates by whether their entities and sources are stable enough to build on, their answers can be checked, and discovery is genuinely difficult.

    “A classifier then ranks candidates by whether their entities and sources are stable enough to build on, their answers can be checked, and discovery is genuinely difficult.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    WANDR task shapes originate in real professional usage, and tasks are admitted only if they are high-volume, feasible, and discriminative against internal baselines.

    “Its task shapes originate in real professional usage, and tasks are admitted only if they are high-volume, feasible, and discriminative against internal baselines.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Sibling variants expose practical tradeoffs, such as admitting a larger target pool while increasing the required volume.

    “Sibling variants expose practical tradeoffs, such as admitting a larger target pool while increasing the required volume.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Throughout the authoring loop, four automated bars require that the package runs, its solver-facing description, judge specification, and schema remain aligned, primitive internal baselines do not already solve it, and stronger internal rollouts meaningfully outperform weaker ones.

    “Throughout the loop, four automated bars require that the package runs, its solver-facing description, judge specification, and schema remain aligned, primitive internal baselines do not already solve it, and stronger internal rollouts meaningfully outperform weaker ones.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The resulting challenge for WANDR is to sustain both breadth and per-record accuracy across a large, structured collection-precisely the regime in which current agents struggle.

    “The resulting challenge is to sustain both breadth and per-record accuracy across a large, structured collection-precisely the regime in which current agents struggle.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The canonical WANDR hierarchy is intentionally small, but changing what a level represents, how many children it requires, or where a new branch attaches covers a broad range of research workflows.

    “The canonical hierarchy is intentionally small, but changing what a level represents, how many children it requires, or where a new branch attaches covers a broad range of research workflows.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The author-critic loop automates much of the review; the human rubric provides a final checklist when sign-off is used.

    “The author-critic loop automates much of the review; the human rubric provides a final checklist when sign-off is used.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The reference-free verification approach makes tasks about current and changing facts admissible and allows task production to scale through a semi-automated pipeline rather than exhaustive expert annotation.

    “This makes tasks about current and changing facts admissible and allows task production to scale through a semi-automated pipeline rather than exhaustive expert annotation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    Per-record verdicts and hierarchical metrics in WANDR provide dense partial-progress rewards.

    “per-record verdicts and hierarchical metrics provide dense partial-progress rewards”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The pipeline merges everything found across 10-12 authoring rollouts into a single best-known solution, which must recover a near-full requested volume.

    “The pipeline merges everything found across 10-12 authoring rollouts into a single best-known solution, which must recover a near-full requested volume.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Every branch in a WANDR hierarchy ends in one or more URLs, so each claim remains tied to the page that supports it.

    “Every branch ends in one or more URLs, so each claim remains tied to the page that supports it.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    A reviewer samples graded records and regrades each one blindly, forming an independent verdict before seeing the automated judgment.

    “A reviewer samples graded records and regrades each one blindly, forming an independent verdict before seeing the automated judgment.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The full verdict evaluates both the page and submitted excerpts, while the retrieval-only verdict asks only whether the page satisfies every substantive task requirement.

    “The full verdict evaluates both the page and submitted excerpts, while the retrieval-only verdict asks only whether the page satisfies every substantive task requirement.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    These collection benchmarks expand the width axis, but generally do not require the same multi-stage enrichment and corroboration process to be repeated for every discovered member.

    “These benchmarks expand the width axis, but generally do not require the same multi-stage enrichment and corroboration process to be repeated for every discovered member.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Each admitted task receives distribution labels, and selection matches the target distributions; a strong task may remain unused when its bucket is already full.

    “Each admitted task receives distribution labels, and selection matches the target distributions; a strong task may remain unused when its bucket is already full.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Per-level required counts in WANDR provide an explicit difficulty gradient for curriculum learning.

    “per-level required counts provide an explicit difficulty gradient for curriculum learning”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    A first filter retains requests shaped like wide research-asking to compile a list, table, or directory-and favors sessions with heavy tool use.

    “A first filter retains requests shaped like wide research-asking to compile a list, table, or directory-and favors sessions with heavy tool use.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Closed or predictable axes are canonicalized, while open-ended axes are semantically deduplicated; this prevents cosmetic variants from satisfying a volume floor more than once and makes coverage well-defined across parent tasks and subtasks.

    “Closed or predictable axes are canonicalized, while open-ended axes are semantically deduplicated; this prevents cosmetic variants from satisfying a volume floor more than once and makes coverage well-defined across parent tasks and subtasks.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The benchmark reports the simple unweighted mean of each per-task metric. Every task therefore contributes equally to the headline score, regardless of its required record count.

    “The benchmark reports the simple unweighted mean of each per-task metric.Every task therefore contributes equally to the headline score, regardless of its required record count.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    WANDR's structure makes it a plausible RL substrate.

    “the same structure makes it a plausible RL substrate”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The association between requirement count and complete support is descriptive because requirement count also varies with task content and structure.

    “This association is descriptive because requirement count also varies with task content and structure”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    It lets a model compose retrieval, ranking, filtering, fan-out, and rendering primitives through generated Python, while the sandbox executes batching, retries, joins, aggregation, and deduplication without a separate model turn for every web operation.

    “It lets a model compose retrieval, ranking, filtering, fan-out, and rendering primitives through generated Python, while the sandbox executes batching, retries, joins, aggregation, and deduplication without a separate model turn for every web operation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Perplexity, 2026

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The judge also reports confidence. A leaf signal is used only at confidence 2 or 3; lower-confidence leaves are treated as missing, so they do not enter precision but can reduce recall when their omission leaves fewer than the required number of members.

    “The judge also reports confidence.A leaf signal is used only at confidence 2 or 3; lower-confidence leaves are treated as missing, so they do not enter precision but can reduce recall when their omission leaves fewer than the required number of members.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The drop from precision to recall is primarily a breadth signal: recall zero-pads unmet quotas and collapses duplicate identities, whereas precision averages the submitted children.

    “The drop from precision to recall is primarily a breadth signal: recall zero-pads unmet quotas and collapses duplicate identities, whereas precision averages the submitted children.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    The gap between scores under verdict_retrieval and verdict_full measures how much additional credit is lost when grading the complete submitted record rather than page-level task satisfaction alone.

    “The gap between scores under verdict_retrieval and verdict_full measures how much additional credit is lost when grading the complete submitted record rather than page-level task satisfaction alone.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Trials ending in terminal errors after repeated retries have no metric-bearing verifier result and are zero-filled in the aggregate.

    “Trials ending in terminal errors after repeated retries have no metric-bearing verifier result and are zero-filled in the aggregate.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The four-layer framework measures failures at aggregate or task-local resolution.

    “The four-layer framework measures failures at aggregate or task-local resolution.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Resource use again has no shared monotonic response, so these observational curves localize the loss but do not isolate hierarchy as its cause (Figure 10, bottom block).

    “Resource use again has no shared monotonic response, so these observational curves localize the loss but do not isolate hierarchy as its cause (Figure 10, bottom block).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    The layered verifier makes these components inspectable at structural, task, and record resolution.

    “The layered verifier makes these components inspectable at structural, task, and record resolution.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Identity is not a major aggregate explanation of endpoint differences, but it can materially damage an affected task (Table 8; Appendix H).

    “Identity is not a major aggregate explanation of endpoint differences, but it can materially damage an affected task (Table 8; Appendix H).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    All systems use the same pinned GPT-5.4 evaluation configuration: low effort for triage and canonicalization, medium for judging, and high for deduplication.

    “All systems use the same pinned GPT-5.4 evaluation configuration: low effort for triage and canonicalization, medium for judging, and high for deduplication.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Reference-free grading accommodates changing facts without maintaining an exhaustive gold answer table.

    “Reference-free grading accommodates changing facts without maintaining an exhaustive gold answer table”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Every leaf record receives an independent binary verdict, and the verdicts are then aggregated to the task level.

    “Every leaf record receives an independent binary verdict, and the verdicts are then aggregated to the task level.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    SaC's advantage is broad but not uniform.

    “SaC's advantage is broad but not uniform”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    Precision measures the quality of submitted members, so low precision is consistent with a depth failure such as incorrect facts, unfaithful excerpts, or missing corroboration.

    “Precision measures the quality of submitted members, so low precision is consistent with a depth failure such as incorrect facts, unfaithful excerpts, or missing corroboration.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The page-length analysis is exploratory because page length co-varies with source type and record complexity.

    “This analysis is exploratory because page length co-varies with source type and record complexity”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Search as Code (SaC) is well matched to this repeated horizontal structure.

    “Search as Code (SaC) is well matched to this repeated horizontal structure.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Poor identity management can inflate raw submitted-member counts, but canonicalization and deduplication collapse aliases before recall is computed.

    “Poor identity management can inflate raw submitted-member counts, but canonicalization and deduplication collapse aliases before recall is computed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    SaC's distinctive signature is stronger breadth retention and evidence construction, not uniformly better performance at every layer.

    “SaC's distinctive signature is therefore stronger breadth retention and evidence construction, not uniformly better performance at every layer”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Triage routes these cases through a heavier JavaScript-rendering browser before judgment, reducing crawler-induced failures.

    “Triage routes these cases through a heavier JavaScript-rendering browser before judgment, reducing crawler-induced failures.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    These external systems are evaluated only after the task set is frozen and are not used for admission or rejection.

    “These external systems are evaluated only after the task set is frozen and are not used for admission or rejection.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Each submitted record carries the page and excerpt needed for verification.

    “each submitted record instead carries the page and excerpt needed for verification”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    Solving a WANDR task amounts to executing a retrieval program over a required entity space: discover enough members, enrich every required branch, qualify the resulting pages, and render source-backed records.

    “Solving a WANDR task amounts to executing a retrieval program over a required entity space: discover enough members, enrich every required branch, qualify the resulting pages, and render source-backed records.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Because grading re-fetches cited pages, solving and grading should occur close together: a URL that changes after submission can cause an otherwise correct record to fail.

    “Because grading re-fetches cited pages, solving and grading should occur close together: a URL that changes after submission can cause an otherwise correct record to fail.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Solve converts every system's output into a common record format, ensuring identical downstream grading.

    “Solve converts every system's output into a common record format, ensuring identical downstream grading.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    The soft-hard gap is a completeness signal: hard scores remove partial credit from submitted members whose required subtrees are incomplete.

    “The soft-hard gap is a completeness signal: hard scores remove partial credit from submitted members whose required subtrees are incomplete.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Structure alone does not capture source accessibility, semantic ambiguity, or the practical effort required to complete each branch.

    “Structure alone does not capture source accessibility, semantic ambiguity, or the practical effort required to complete each branch.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Weak internal baselines score low while stronger internal rollouts score meaningfully higher on discriminative tasks.

    “Weak internal baselines score low while stronger internal rollouts score meaningfully higher.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Once identity is resolved on each axis, required volumes, coverage, and score rollups are well defined.

    “Once identity is resolved on each axis, required volumes, coverage, and score rollups are well defined.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    If a record is so invalid that substantive judgment would be meaningless, the judge short-circuits the remaining fields to false; otherwise, it still reports the requirement-level signals for diagnosis.

    “If a record is so invalid that substantive judgment would be meaningless, the judge short-circuits the remaining fields to false; otherwise, it still reports the requirement-level signals for diagnosis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Per-level required counts support curriculum learning.

    “per-level required counts support curriculum learning”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Record-level verdicts and hierarchy-level scores provide denser outcome rewards than a single exact match.

    “record-level verdicts and hierarchy-level scores provide denser outcome rewards than a single exact match”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    An excerpt may quote the page exactly but omit the sentence that establishes the date, role, or source authority; it then passes excerpts_faithful but fails the relevant _supported field.

    “An excerpt may quote the page exactly but omit the sentence that establishes the date, role, or source authority; it then passes excerpts_faithful but fails the relevant _supported field.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    A single-field key is sufficient when its values are already unambiguous within the task.

    “A single-field key is sufficient when its values are already unambiguous within the task.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Scattered extraction: the required evidence appears in different parts of a page, such as a title, date, and substantive comment.

    “Scattered extraction -the required evidence appears in different parts of a page, such as a title, date, and substantive comment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Each key must contain enough information to identify its values without relying on an implicit parent.

    “Each key must contain enough information to identify its values without relying on an implicit parent.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    WANDR provides a basis for improving comprehensive search systems and testing whether those gains hold at scale.

    “It provides a basis for improving comprehensive search systems and testing whether those gains hold at scale.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Open-ended entities such as people and companies usually require semantic comparison.

    “Open-ended entities such as people and companies usually require semantic comparison.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Heavy source: the evidence may live in a long report, registry, filing, or PDF.

    “Heavy source -the evidence may live in a long report, registry, filing, or PDF.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The page may drift after solving.

    “the page may drift after solving”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The authoring pipeline supplies a broader set of vetted guidance tasks to the author, critic, and linter.

    “The authoring pipeline supplies a broader set of vetted guidance tasks to the author, critic, and linter.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The separation between faithfulness and completeness is especially important when a solver relies on search snippets, which can omit qualifiers or join nearby text out of context.

    “This separation is especially important when a solver relies on search snippets, which can omit qualifiers or join nearby text out of context.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Curation follows admission and selects from the admitted pool to match release-level distributions.

    “Curation follows admission and selects from the admitted pool to match release-level distributions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The complete-record verdict, verdict_full, additionally requires validity, a usable page, a clear answer, faithful excerpts, and complete excerpt support.

    “The complete-record verdict, verdict_full, additionally requires validity, a usable page, a clear answer, faithful excerpts, and complete excerpt support.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Long-tail source: the qualifying evidence may sit outside the highest-ranked results.

    “Long-tail source -the qualifying evidence may sit outside the highest-ranked results.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    WANDR is useful as a stress test, but the resulting score distribution should not be interpreted as the difficulty of research requests in deployment.

    “This makes WANDR useful as a stress test, but the resulting score distribution should not be interpreted as the difficulty of research requests in deployment.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Figure 10 identifies descriptive scale sensitivity in the current fixed-configuration runs, but target volume, intermediate-level count, content, and difficulty co-vary.

    “Figure 10 identifies descriptive scale sensitivity in the current fixed-configuration runs, but target volume, intermediate-level count, content, and difficulty co-vary.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given

    A merged solution over 10-12 authoring rollouts recovers a near-full requested volume floor.

    “A merged solution over 10-12 authoring rollouts recovers a near-full requested volume floor.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Fixtures are unit tests for the task's judge; they ship with the task but never grade the systems under test.

    “Fixtures are unit tests for the task's judge; they ship with the task but never grade the systems under test.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Canonicalization and deduplication introduce additional boundary decisions when identities are ambiguous.

    “Canonicalization and deduplication introduce additional boundary decisions when identities are ambiguous.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    When a fixture the author trusts disagrees with the judge, the disagreement is triaged-usually the fixture is wrong and gets fixed, but a genuine judge defect sends the task back for repair.

    “When a fixture the author trusts disagrees with the judge, the disagreement is triaged-usually the fixture is wrong and gets fixed, but a genuine judge defect sends the task back for repair.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The solver-facing description, judge specification, and schema state the same requirements in the same order; mechanical lints pass.

    “The solver-facing description, judge specification, and schema state the same requirements in the same order; mechanical lints pass.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Every substantive requirement is evaluated twice: a _satisfied field asks whether the full page supports the requirement regardless of excerpts, and a paired _supported field asks whether the submitted excerpts alone are sufficient for a careful reader to verify the same requirement.

    “Every substantive requirement is evaluated twice.A field ending in _satisfied asks whether the full page supports the requirement, regardless of which excerpts the solver selected.Its paired _supported field asks whether the submitted excerpts alone are sufficient for a careful reader to verify the same requirement.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Exact matching is sufficient after deterministic normalization for fields such as URLs or fixed labels.

    “Exact matching is sufficient after deterministic normalization for fields such as URLs or fixed labels.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    A released task reflects a recurring form of professional work, not the content of any individual query or private record.

    “A released task therefore reflects a recurring form of professional work, not the content of any individual query or private record.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given

    A task must be runnable, convention-clean, sufficiently difficult, discriminative, empirically feasible, and judgeable before it can enter the released set.

    “A task must be runnable, convention-clean, sufficiently difficult, discriminative, empirically feasible, and judgeable before it can enter the released set.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Evidence verification avoids a manual and static gold table but introduces judge and retrieval uncertainty.

    “Evidence verification avoids a manual and static gold table but introduces judge and retrieval uncertainty.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Structured extraction: exact values sit in tables, filings, or specification sheets.

    “Structured extraction -exact values sit in tables, filings, or specification sheets.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Folding franchise locations and subsidiaries into one identity creates a brand-level task; keeping them separate creates an outlet- or company-level task.

    “Folding franchise locations and subsidiaries into one identity creates a brand-level task; keeping them separate creates an outlet-or company-level task.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Identity policy is part of the task definition, not merely cleanup.

    “Identity policy is part of the task definition, not merely cleanup.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    verdict_retrieval asks whether the fetched page satisfies every substantive task requirement, independently of the submitted excerpts.

    “verdict_retrieval asks whether the fetched page satisfies every substantive task requirement, independently of the submitted excerpts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The grader uses LLM judge calls and re-fetches each cited page.

    “The grader uses LLM judge calls and re-fetches each cited page”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    WANDR limits the cross-record identity step to one sameness policy per key axis.

    “WANDR limits this cross-record step to one sameness policy per key axis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Text stitched from separate passages may mention every needed fact but fail faithfulness because the page never states the combined claim.

    “Conversely, text stitched from separate passages may mention every needed fact but fail faithfulness because the page never states the combined claim.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The cross-system ranking is observational and does not isolate any individual component.

    “The cross-system ranking is therefore observational and does not isolate any individual component.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The five profiled tasks provide orientation, not templates.

    “They provide orientation, not templates”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The grading fetch path affects absolute scores and may confer some alignment advantage, even though the comparative ordering appears less sensitive.

    “The grading fetch path therefore affects absolute scores and may confer some alignment advantage, even though the comparative ordering appears less sensitive.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Faithfulness and completeness are separate.

    “Faithfulness and completeness are separate.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Turkey illustrates identity collapse and subtask gating.

    “Turkey illustrates identity collapse and subtask gating.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Reviewers inspect the rollouts and trajectories accumulated during authoring, which exposes degenerate solution strategies and shortcuts that may not be apparent from the package or aggregate scores alone, and lets reviewers return the task for hardening before admission.

    “Reviewers also inspect the rollouts and trajectories accumulated during authoring.This exposes degenerate solution strategies and shortcuts that may not be apparent from the package or aggregate scores alone, and lets reviewers return the task for hardening before admission.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The mechanical linter runs between steps when only mechanical work remains and patches convention violations without changing the entity class, evidence bar, volume, or judge policy.

    “The mechanical linter runs between steps when only mechanical work remains.It patches convention violations without changing the entity class, evidence bar, volume, or judge policy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Extraction can omit dynamic, tabular, or JavaScript-rendered content.

    “extraction can omit dynamic, tabular, or JavaScript-rendered content”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    The structural statistics in Section 4.5 describe what a task requires, but not how that requirement behaves in practice.

    “The structural statistics in Section 4.5 describe what a task requires, but not how that requirement behaves in practice.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The 500 released tasks are designed to represent recurring patterns in de-identified production requests, but they are not a random sample of all research work.

    “The 500 released tasks are designed to represent recurring patterns in de-identified production requests, but they are not a random sample of all research work.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The package loads and executes under the public harness with its fixtures.

    “The package loads and executes under the public harness with its fixtures.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The streaming grader can amortize overlapping work across batched rollouts.

    “the streaming grader can amortize overlapping work across batched rollouts”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Broad extraction: the claim itself may require many pieces of evidence.

    “Broad extraction -the claim itself may require many pieces of evidence.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The exact requirements vary by task, but several evidence patterns recur across the benchmark.

    “The exact requirements vary by task, but several evidence patterns recur across the benchmark”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The five tasks profiled here are a deliberately varied subset that makes their design rationale explicit.

    “The five tasks profiled here are a deliberately varied subset that makes their design rationale explicit.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Authoring retains only the seed's reusable pattern and re-grounds the task in entities with a public web presence.

    “Second, authoring retains only the seed's reusable pattern and re-grounds the task in entities with a public web presence.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Changing what counts as the same entity changes the set the task asks the solver to cover.

    “Changing what counts as the same entity changes the set the task asks the solver to cover.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The grader first re-fetches cited pages through an agentic fetch backend that is also available to the Perplexity solver; unsuccessful fetches are routed to a browser.

    “The grader first re-fetches cited pages through an agentic fetch backend that is also available to the Perplexity solver; unsuccessful fetches are routed to a browser.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The task pipeline can generate held-out training packages.

    “The task pipeline can generate held-out training packages”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Without identity rules, cosmetic variants could satisfy a volume floor more than once.

    “Without them, cosmetic variants could satisfy a volume floor more than once”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    All six rows use the same 45 tasks and the same score and operational columns as the full sweep.

    “All six rows use the same 45 tasks and the same score and operational columns as the full sweep.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Soft metrics reward correct partial progress when the requested collection is incomplete; hard metrics preserve pressure to complete whole members; and the gap between the two verdicts separates page-level task satisfaction from complete record construction.

    “Soft metrics reward correct partial progress when the requested collection is incomplete; hard metrics preserve pressure to complete whole members; and the gap between the two verdicts separates page-level task satisfaction from complete record construction.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    This structure aligns with RL batches, where multiple tasks and rollouts may revisit the same pages and entities.

    “This structure aligns with RL batches, where multiple tasks and rollouts may revisit the same pages and entities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    This three-system association is descriptive rather than causal, but it suggests that output-only systems may be somewhat disadvantaged while also making it unlikely that delivery alone explains the much larger gaps in the main ranking.

    “This three-system association is descriptive rather than causal, but it suggests that output-only systems may be somewhat disadvantaged while also making it unlikely that delivery alone explains the much larger gaps in the main ranking.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    These are independent rollouts rather than paired deterministic executions, so the differences are descriptive associations with both the delivery configuration and the particular rollout.

    “These are independent rollouts rather than paired deterministic executions, so the differences are descriptive associations with both the delivery configuration and the particular rollout.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Overlap among rollout records can therefore amortize grading work, while persistent caches limit resumed runs to missing work.

    “Overlap among rollout records can therefore amortize grading work, while persistent caches limit resumed runs to missing work.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The same mechanism can stage breadth and depth separately, allowing a curriculum to move from reliable single-record evidence construction to sustained collection building.

    “The same mechanism can stage breadth and depth separately, allowing a curriculum to move from reliable single-record evidence construction to sustained collection building.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Count reduction controls workload rather than guaranteeing monotonic semantic difficulty, and each generated variant should still pass the normal feasibility and judge checks.

    “Count reduction controls workload rather than guaranteeing monotonic semantic difficulty, and each generated variant should still pass the normal feasibility and judge checks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This supervision is denser than a single exact-match reward, though moving from outcome-level to process supervision would require nontrivial trajectory backtracking and heuristics for assigning credit from individually graded final records to the actions responsible for them.

    “This supervision is denser than a single exact-match reward, though moving from outcome-level to process supervision would require nontrivial trajectory backtracking and heuristics for assigning credit from individually graded final records to the actions responsible for them.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    A trainer can assign outcome rewards at record and branch granularity or use universal and task-specific sub-verdicts as auxiliary signals while retaining task-level F1 as the objective.

    “A trainer can therefore assign outcome rewards at record and branch granularity or use universal and task-specific sub-verdicts as auxiliary signals while retaining task-level F1 as the objective.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    WANDR's structure offers several properties relevant to future training splits and harnesses.

    “Its structure nevertheless offers several properties relevant to future training splits and harnesses.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Using the released benchmark split for RL would compromise evaluation validity.

    “To preserve evaluation validity, RL should use newly generated or separately held-out task packages, not the released benchmark split.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
243 of 243
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The de-identified product-usage logs are a representative and valid source for deriving benchmark tasks that reflect professional knowledge work.

    “Tasks are derived from de-identified product-usage logs”
    “Each task begins with a seed: a real request mined from de-identified product-usage logs.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A form of research common in professional work is poorly represented by single-answer and report-writing benchmarks.

    “WANDR evaluates a form of research common in professional work but poorly represented by single-answer and report-writing benchmarks: constructing a large structured collection while independently verifying every member.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The historical rollouts accumulated during authoring are representative of WANDR task behavior.

    “We aggregate that archive to characterize WANDR empirically at three resolutions.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The 500 released tasks are a representative evaluation benchmark split.

    “WANDR is released primarily as an evaluation benchmark.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The de-identification methodology of DRACO is sufficient to remove identifying details from seed requests.

    “First, seed mining follows the de-identification methodology of the DRACO benchmark[Zhong et al., 2026]: requests are sampled from a de-identified pool and reworded to remove identifying details.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Public web presence of entities is sufficient to re-ground tasks without private content.

    “Second, authoring retains only the seed's reusable pattern and re-grounds the task in entities with a public web presence.”
6 of 6

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Polshkov, V., Pitera, M., Yang, J., Priemko, K., Gaiduk, M., Nikolenko, A., Bykov, D., Southern, C., Yarats, D., & Ma, J.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2026
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7203679213
Cited by
0
References
26
Type
posted content
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web Data Mining and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
Keywords
research agents, benchmark, entity discovery, web search, information retrieval evaluation, evidence verification, market mapping, due diligence, talent sourcing, product comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-23.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-23.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review