PreprintCited by 0

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

DreamDojo: A Generalist Robot World Model from Large-Scale Human Videos

Gao, Shenyuan, Liang, William, Zheng, Kaiyuan, Malik, Ayaan, Ye, Seonghyeon, Yu, Sihyun, Tseng, Wei-Cheng, Dong, Yuzhu, Mo, Kaichun, Lin, Chen-Hsuan, Ma, Qianli, Nah, Seungjun, Magne, Loic, Xiang, Jiannan, Xie, Yuqi, Zheng, Ruijie, Niu, Dantong, Tan, You Liang, Zentner, K. R., Kurian, George, Indupuru, Suneel, Jannaty, Pooya, Gu, Jinwei, Zhang, Jun, Malik, Jitendra, Abbeel, Pieter, Liu, Ming-Yu, Zhu, Yuke, Jang, Joel, Fan, Linxi "Jim·2026·arXiv

Abstract

Being able to simulate the outcomes of actions in varied environments will revolutionize the development of generalist agents at scale. However, modeling these world dynamics, especially for dexterous robotics tasks, poses significant challenges due to limited data coverage and scarce action labels. As an endeavor towards this end, we introduce DreamDojo, a foundation world model that learns diverse interactions and dexterous controls from 44k hours of egocentric human videos. Our data mixture represents the largest video dataset to date for world model pretraining, spanning a wide range of daily scenarios with diverse objects and skills. To address the scarcity of action labels, we introduce continuous latent actions as unified proxy actions, enhancing interaction knowledge transfer from unlabeled videos. After post-training on small-scale target robot data, DreamDojo demonstrates a strong understanding of physics and precise action controllability. We also devise a distillation pipeline that accelerates DreamDojo to a real-time speed of 10.81 FPS and further improves context consistency. Our work enables several important applications based on generative world models, including live teleoperation, policy evaluation, and model-based planning. Systematic evaluation on multiple challenging out-of-distribution (OOD) benchmarks verifies the significance of our method for simulating open-world, contact-rich tasks, paving the way for general-purpose robot world models.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2602.06949

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gao, S., Liang, W., Zheng, K., Malik, A., Ye, S., Yu, S., Tseng, W.-C., Dong, Y., Mo, K., Lin, C.-H., Ma, Q., Nah, S., Magne, L., Xiang, J., Xie, Y., Zheng, R., Niu, D., Tan, Y. L., Zentner, K. R., Kurian, G., Indupuru, S., Jannaty, P., Gu, J., Zhang, J., Malik, J., Abbeel, P., Liu, M.-Y., Zhu, Y., Jang, J., & Fan, L. ".
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2026
References
3
Type
Preprint

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review