Agent Skills: A Data-Driven Analysis of Claude Skills for Extending Large Language Model Functionality
Open accessAbstract
Agent skills extend large language model (LLM) agents with reusable, program-like modules that define triggering conditions, procedural logic, and tool interactions. As these skills proliferate in public marketplaces, it is unclear what types are available, how users adopt them, and what risks they pose. To answer these questions, we conduct a large-scale, data-driven analysis of 40,285 publicly listed skills from a major marketplace. Our results show that skill publication tends to occur in short bursts that track shifts in community attention. We also find that skill content is highly concentrated in software engineering workflows, while information retrieval and content creation account for a substantial share of adoption. Beyond content trends, we uncover a pronounced supply-demand imbalance across categories, and we show that most skills remain within typical prompt budgets despite a heavy-tailed length distribution. Finally, we observe strong ecosystem homogeneity, with widespread intent-level redundancy, and we identify non-trivial safety risks, including skills that enable state-changing or system-level actions. Overall, our findings provide a quantitative snapshot of agent skills as an emerging infrastructure layer for agents and inform future work on skill reuse, standardization, and safety-aware design.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Authored skill documentation serves as a practical interface through which operational experience is gradually turned into reusable behavioral structure.
“In this way, authored skill documentation is not merely descriptive. It also serves as a practical interface through which operational experience is gradually turned into reusable behavioral structure [Ling et al., 2026].”
From Externalization in LLM Agents: A Unified Review of Memory, Skills, Protocols and Harness Engineering (2026) · cites this paper as Ling et al., 2026
The Introduction (p. 2) says skills package task knowledge, procedural logic, and tool-use patterns into reusable units, and Appendix A.1 (p. 10) says SKILL.md encodes instructions the agent follows. This supports documentation as a practical interface for reusable behavior, but the paper does not establish that operational experience is gradually converted into that structure. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredShared skills turn procedural expertise into public capability units that can be reused, forked, and maintained across agents.
“Shared skills turn procedural expertise into public capability units that can be reused, forked, and maintained across agents [Ling et al., 2026].”
From Externalization in LLM Agents: A Unified Review of Memory, Skills, Protocols and Harness Engineering (2026) · cites this paper as Ling et al., 2026
The Introduction (pp. 1–2) describes skills as shareable, versioned modules that package procedural knowledge for reuse, and says shared libraries support refinement across applications. The Data Collection section (p. 2) documents a public marketplace and installations across platforms. The copy does not establish that skills can be forked or maintained across agents specifically. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredSkill specifications turn procedural expertise from an opaque internal state into an explicit object that can be inspected, discussed, revised, and governed.
“Its value lies in turning procedural expertise from an opaque internal state into an explicit object that can be inspected, discussed, revised, and governed [Ling et al., 2026].”
From Externalization in LLM Agents: A Unified Review of Memory, Skills, Protocols and Harness Engineering (2026) · cites this paper as Ling et al., 2026
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Still being checked.
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- Mert Cemri, Melissa Z Pan, Shuyi Yang, Lakshya A Agrawal, Bhavya Chopra, Rishabh Tiwari, Kurt Keutzer, Aditya Parameswaran, Dan Klein, Kannan Ramchandran, and 1 others. 2025. Why do multi-agent llm systems fail? arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.13657 . · arXiv
- Jianlv Chen, Shitao Xiao, Peitian Zhang, Kun Luo, Defu Lian, and Zheng Liu. 2024. Bge m3-embedding: Multi-lingual, multi-functionality, multi-granularity text embeddings through self-knowledge distillation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.03216 , 4(5). · arXiv
- Haibo Jin, Kuang Peng, Ye Yu, Xiaopeng Yuan, and Haohan Wang. 2026. Agent primitives: Reusable latent building blocks for multi-agent systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.03695 . · arXiv
- Daniel Liu, Krishna Upadhyay, Vinaik Chhetri, AB Siddique, and Umar Farooq. 2026a. A large-scale study on the development and issues of multi-agent ai systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.07136 . · arXiv
- Yi Liu, Weizhe Wang, Ruitao Feng, Yao Zhang, Guangquan Xu, Gelei Deng, Yuekang Li, and Leo Zhang. 2026b. Agent skills in the wild: An empirical study of security vulnerabilities at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.10338 . · arXiv
- Yimeng Liu, Misha Sra, Jeevana Priya Inala, and Chenglong Wang. 2025. Reuseit: Synthesizing reusable ai agent workflows for web automation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.14308 . · arXiv
- Qwen, :, An Yang, Baosong Yang, Beichen Zhang, Binyuan Hui, Bo Zheng, Bowen Yu, Chengyuan Li, Dayiheng Liu, Fei Huang, Haoran Wei, Huan Lin, Jian Yang, Jianhong Tu, Jianwei Zhang, Jianxin Yang, Jiaxi Yang, Jingren Zhou, and 25 others. 2025. Qwen2.5 technical report. Preprint , arXiv:2412.15115. · arXiv
- Tayiba Raheem and Gahangir Hossain. 2025. Agentic ai systems: Opportunities, challenges, and trustworthiness. In 2025 IEEE International Conference on Electro Information Technology (eIT) , pages 618624. IEEE.
- Ranjan Sapkota, Konstantinos I Roumeliotis, and Manoj Karkee. 2025. Ai agents vs. agentic ai: A conceptual taxonomy, applications and challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.10468 . · arXiv
- David Schmotz, Sahar Abdelnabi, and Maksym Andriushchenko. 2025. Agent skills enable a new class of realistic and trivially simple prompt injections. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.26328 . · arXiv
- Noah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik Narasimhan, and Shunyu Yao. 2023. Reflexion: Language agents with verbal reinforcement learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 36:8634-8652.
- Guanzhi Wang, Yuqi Xie, Yunfan Jiang, Ajay Mandlekar, Chaowei Xiao, Yuke Zhu, Linxi Fan, and Anima Anandkumar. 2023. Voyager: An open-ended embodied agent with large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.16291 . · arXiv
- Lei Wang, Chen Ma, Xueyang Feng, Zeyu Zhang, Hao Yang, Jingsen Zhang, Zhiyuan Chen, Jiakai Tang, Xu Chen, Yankai Lin, and 1 others. 2024. A survey on large language model based autonomous agents. Frontiers of Computer Science , 18(6):186345.
- Yujiang Wu, Shanshan Zhong, Yubin Kim, and Chenyan Xiong. 2025. What generative search engines like and how to optimize web content cooperatively. Preprint , arXiv:2510.11438. · arXiv
- Shunyu Yao, Jeffrey Zhao, Dian Yu, Nan Du, Izhak Shafran, Karthik R Narasimhan, and Yuan Cao. 2022. React: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models. In The eleventh international conference on learning representations .
- Boyuan Zheng, Michael Y Fatemi, Xiaolong Jin, Zora Zhiruo Wang, Apurva Gandhi, Yueqi Song, Yu Gu, Jayanth Srinivasa, Gaowen Liu, Graham Neubig, and 1 others. 2025. Skillweaver: Web agents can self-improve by discovering and honing skills. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.07079 . · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Externalization in LLM Agents: A Unified Review of Memory, Skills, Protocols and Harness Engineering
Zhou, C., Chai, H., Chen, W., Guo, Z., Shan, R., Song, Y., Xu, T., Yang, Y., Yu, A., Zhang, W., et al. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.08224 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ling, G., Zhong, S., & Huang, R.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2026
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2602.08004
- OpenAlex
- W7128498598
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Keywords
- LLM agents, agent skills, Claude, supply and demand imbalance, skill reuse, information retrieval, content creation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
