CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 4Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsVideo Analysis and SummarizationHuman Pose and Action Recognition

EventMemAgent: Hierarchical Event-Centric Memory for Online Video Understanding with Adaptive Tool Use

Open access
Wen, Siwei, Wang, Zhangcheng, Zhang, Xingjian, Huang, Lei, Wu, Wenjun·2026·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2602.15329arXiv 2602.15329
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Online video understanding requires models to perform continuous perception and long-range reasoning within potentially infinite visual streams. Its fundamental challenge lies in the conflict between the unbounded nature of streaming media input and the limited context window of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs). Current methods primarily rely on passive processing, which often face a trade-off between maintaining long-range context and capturing the fine-grained details necessary for complex tasks. To address this, we introduce EventMemAgent, an active online video agent framework based on a hierarchical memory module. Our framework employs a dual-layer strategy for online videos: short-term memory detects event boundaries and utilizes event-granular reservoir sampling to process streaming video frames within a fixed-length buffer dynamically; long-term memory structuredly archives past observations on an event-by-event basis. Furthermore, we integrate a multi-granular perception toolkit for active, iterative evidence capture and employ Agentic Reinforcement Learning (Agentic RL) to end-to-end internalize reasoning and tool-use strategies into the agent's intrinsic capabilities. Experiments show that EventMemAgent achieves competitive results on online video benchmarks. The code will be released here: https://github.com/lingcco/EventMemAgent.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

EventMemAgent is an active online video agent that combines hierarchical event-centric memory, a multi-granular perception toolkit, and Agentic RL to handle infinite video streams within a fixed context window. It achieves 60.75% average on OVO-Bench and 77.00% on StreamingBench using no more than 32 input frames.

Key findings

  • On OVO-Bench, EventMemAgent reaches 60.75% average accuracy with ≤32 frames, surpassing GPT-4o (59.54%) and outperforming open-source methods by 4.27% in Real-Time Visual Perception, 1.08% in Backward Tracing, and 1.1% in Forward Active Responding.
  • On StreamingBench, it achieves 77.00% average; the paper notes that success there depends heavily on precise perception of current content rather than complex long-term history integration.
  • Ablations: hierarchical memory beats fixed-length segmentation on OVO-Bench (60.75 vs. 60.16, ↓0.59) and StreamingBench (77.00 vs. 76.80, ↓0.20). Removing Object Detection lowers OVO-Bench overall to 56.87 (↓3.88); removing OCR lowers it to 57.88 (↓2.87).
  • Agentic RL changes tool-use behavior: before training, over 96% of cases either made no tool calls or repeatedly called tools until the maximum turn limit; after training, the agent uses Search Memory for past-event questions and OCR/Detect Objects more often for real-time perception. Training shows rising average reward and response length.

Methods

  • The framework uses a short-term memory buffer (capacity K=32, 1 FPS) with online event segmentation via normalized grayscale histogram Pearson correlation, triggering a boundary when ρ < δ (δ=0.2), plus event-granular reservoir sampling. Long-term memory archives event tuples containing a first-frame visual anchor, MLLM-generated caption, semantic embedding, and change log.
  • The multi-granular toolkit includes memory search (temporal and semantic; top-3 events with similarity >0.3), OCR, and object detection. Backbone is Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct, with Grounding DINO for detection and Deepseek-OCR for OCR; LTM captions use Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct and embeddings use Qwen3-Embedding-0.6B.
  • Agentic RL uses GRPO (group size 8, KL coefficient 0, learning rate 1e-6, global batch size 64, 1 epoch) on 10K MovieChat samples labeled by VideoMarathon, with reward based solely on terminal answer correctness. Evaluation is on OVO-Bench and StreamingBench under the online video format, using eight 80G A100 GPUs.

Limitations

  • The paper does not state a limitations section.
  • Evident from the text: evaluation is limited to OVO-Bench and StreamingBench, and training uses 10K MovieChat samples labeled by VideoMarathon.
  • Evident from the text: the system relies on fixed settings such as 1 FPS, STM capacity 32, δ=0.2, and a minimum event duration of 8 frames; event segmentation depends on grayscale histogram correlation.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2602.15329

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 25 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    Removing the OCR tool reduces overall OVO-Bench performance by 2.87.

    “w/o OCR | 76.51 72.48 72.41 55.62 67.33 68.48 | 68.80 | 58.92 66.22 39.25 | 54.80 | 34.81 70.27 45.00 | 50.03 | 57.88”
    • Also stated in: § TimeRange: [start time -end time] · plain
      “(↓ 2.87)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The untrained agent fails to use tools flexibly.

    “While sharing the same architecture, the untrained agent fails to use tools flexibly.”
    • Also stated in: § TimeRange: [start time -end time] · plain
      “(Left) The untrained agent fails to use tools flexibly.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Response Length significantly increases.

    “we observe a significant increase in the Response Length (right)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Removing the detect objects tool reduces overall OVO-Bench performance by 3.88.

    “w/o Detect | 75.17 68.81 67.24 56.18 67.33 67.93 | 67.11 | 59.93 65.54 39.25 | 54.91 | 33.24 70.91 41.67 | 48.60 | 56.87”
    • Also stated in: § TimeRange: [start time -end time] · plain
      “(↓ 3.88)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Removing tools such as OCR or Object Detection results in a performance decrease on OVO-Bench.

    “As shown in Table 4, removing tools such as OCR or Object Detection results in a performance decrease on OVO-Bench.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 23
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 2
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 18

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Average Reward and Response Length steadily increase throughout the training process.

    “The steady increase in both reward and response length”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Hierarchical memory achieves 77.00 average on StreamingBench compared to 76.80 for fixed-length memory, a 0.20 improvement.

    “Ours (Hierarchical) | 60.75 | 77.00”
    • Also stated in: § TimeRange: [start time -end time] · plain
      “Fixed-length | 60.16 | 76.80”
    • Also stated in: § TimeRange: [start time -end time] · plain
      “(↓ 0.20)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    EventMemAgent outperforms current open-source methods by 4.27% in Real-Time Visual Perception, 1.08% in Backward Tracing, and 1.1% in Forward Active Responding on OVO-Bench.

    “Specifically, our model outperforms current open-source methods by 4.27% in Real-Time Visual Perception, 1.08% in Backward Tracing, and 1.1% in Forward Active Responding.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    EventMemAgent achieves competitive performance with low hardware costs on OVO-Bench and StreamingBench.

    “Experiments on OVO-Bench and StreamingBench show that EventMemAgent achieves competitive performance with low hardware costs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Hierarchical memory achieves 60.75 average on OVO-Bench compared to 60.16 for fixed-length memory, a 0.59 improvement.

    “Ours (Hierarchical) | 60.75 | 77.00”
    • Also stated in: § TimeRange: [start time -end time] · plain
      “Fixed-length | 60.16 | 76.80”
    • Also stated in: § TimeRange: [start time -end time] · plain
      “(↓ 0.59)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    EventMemAgent achieves an average accuracy of 60.75% on OVO-Bench with input frames limited to 32, surpassing all existing open-source models and GPT-4o (59.54%).

    “With input frames limited to 32, EventMemAgent achieves an average accuracy of 60.75%, surpassing all existing opensource models and even the proprietary model GPT-4o (59.54%).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    This effectively bridges the gap between the infinite video stream and the limited context window.

    “This effectively bridges the gap between the infinite video stream and the limited context window.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Our work addresses these limitations by introducing a hierarchical memory module and a multi-granular toolkit, leveraging reinforcement learning to optimize the agent's planning and execution within dynamic streaming environments.

    “Our work addresses these limitations by introducing a hierarchical memory module and a multi-granular toolkit, leveraging reinforcement learning to optimize the agent's planning and execution within dynamic streaming environments.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Passive perceiving methods often struggle to achieve precise comprehension of fine-grained details when processing a vast number of visual tokens in a single pass.

    “More importantly, passive perceiving methods often struggle to achieve precise comprehension of fine-grained details when processing a vast number of visual tokens in a single pass.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    External memory methods impose substantial overhead and lack semantic interpretability required for complex reasoning.

    “However, such storage imposes substantial overhead and lacks the semantic interpretability required for complex reasoning.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 5 sources checked
    • cites [5]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [8]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [34]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [39]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [43]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    This combination ensures high-fidelity perception and precise reasoning within a limited context, leading to superior stability and accuracy across diverse online video scenarios.

    “This combination ensures high-fidelity perception and precise reasoning within a limited context, leading to superior stability and accuracy across diverse online video scenarios.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    In OVO-Bench and StreamingBench, models can only use video content before the question's timestamp to answer.

    “In these benchmarks, models must follow the online video format, which means they can only use the video content before the question's timestamp to answer.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [23]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [15]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Fixed-length memory frequently suffers from semantic fragmentation and information redundancy due to rigid temporal boundaries that bisect continuous actions.

    “Fixed-length Memory (top) frequently suffers from semantic fragmentation and information redundancy due to rigid temporal boundaries that bisect continuous actions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Agentic RL end-to-end internalizes reasoning and tool-use strategies into the agent's intrinsic capabilities.

    “employ Agentic Reinforcement Learning (Agentic RL) to end-to-end internalize reasoning and tool-use strategies into the agent's intrinsic capabilities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The reservoir sampling mechanism guarantees that the inclusion probability for each frame remains uniform, ensuring that E_m consistently serves as an unbiased representative summary of an event stream with an indeterminate duration.

    “This mechanism guarantees that the inclusion probability for each frame remains uniform, ensuring that E m consistently serves as an unbiased representative summary of an event stream with an indeterminate duration.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Current online video agent systems rely heavily on manual prompt engineering, failing to internalize reasoning and tool-invocation strategies into the agent's intrinsic capabilities through end-to-end training.

    “Furthermore, these systems rely heavily on manual prompt engineering [34], failing to internalize reasoning and tool-invocation strategies into the agent's intrinsic capabilities through end-to-end training.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [34]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    EventMemAgent can handle infinite video streams efficiently while staying within fixed hardware constraints.

    “This demonstrates that our framework can handle infinite video streams efficiently while staying within fixed hardware constraints.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The multi-granular perception toolkit enables active, iterative evidence capture.

    “we integrate a multi-granular perception toolkit for active, iterative evidence capture”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    The agent can autonomously choose to apply OCR and Object Detection to visual anchors in LTM or specific frames in STM.

    “The agent can autonomously choose to apply these operations either to visual anchors associated with events in the LTM or to specific frames within the STM.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The framework can handle infinite video streams efficiently while staying within fixed hardware constraints.

    “This demonstrates that our framework can handle infinite video streams efficiently while staying within fixed hardware constraints.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Current methods primarily rely on passive processing, which often face a trade-off between maintaining long-range context and capturing fine-grained details necessary for complex tasks.

    “Current methods primarily rely on passive processing, which often face a trade-off between maintaining long-range context and capturing the fine-grained details necessary for complex tasks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The event-centric design maximizes the utility of the limited short-term memory, enhancing narrative continuity and informational compactness while avoiding semantic fragmentation and redundancy common in fixed-length partitioning.

    “Furthermore, as illustrated in Fig. 2, our event-centric design maximizes the utility of the limited short-term memory, enhancing narrative continuity and informational compactness while avoiding semantic fragmentation and redundancy common in fixed-length partitioning.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The combination of online event segmentation and event-granular reservoir sampling improves semantic integrity, helping the model better understand information in the video stream.

    “This indicates that the combination of online event segmentation and event-granular reservoir sampling improves semantic integrity, helping the model better understand information in the video stream.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The short-term memory detects event boundaries and utilizes event-granular reservoir sampling to process streaming video frames within a fixed-length buffer dynamically.

    “short-term memory detects event boundaries and utilizes event-granular reservoir sampling to process streaming video frames within a fixed-length buffer dynamically”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Current online video agents are often restricted to limited toolsets and simplistically designed memory modules, which constrains their effectiveness in online video understanding tasks.

    “Current online video agents are often restricted to limited toolsets and simplistically designed memory modules [21], which constrains their effectiveness in online video understanding tasks.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [21]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    StreamAgent relies heavily on manual prompt engineering to guide its decision-making, lacking exploration into utilizing Agentic RL to internalize reasoning and tool-invocation strategies.

    “Meanwhile, StreamAgent [34] relies heavily on manual prompt engineering to guide its decision-making, lacking exploration into utilizing Agentic RL to internalize reasoning and tool-invocation strategies as intrinsic capabilities.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [34]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    GRPO optimizes the agent's policy using group-based relative advantages instead of a separate critic.

    “GRPO optimizes the following objective by utilizing group-based relative advantages instead of a separate critic:”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [10]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    OVO-Bench divides online video tasks into three scenarios: Real-Time Visual Perception, Backward Tracing, and Forward Active Responding.

    “OVO-Bench divides online video tasks into three scenarios: (1) Real-Time Visual Perception, (2) Backward Tracing, and (3) Forward Active Responding, to fully test model performance in different online video settings.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [23]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The multi-granular perception toolkit enables the agent to actively and iteratively capture evidence across different levels of information granularity.

    “Furthermore, we integrate a multi-granular toolkit, such as memory search and object detection, enabling the agent to actively and iteratively capture evidence across different levels of information granularity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Passive visual token management methods inevitably suffer from decay and loss of historical information as the video stream progresses and remain structurally limited by the maximum context window.

    “While these methods can mitigate the issue, they inevitably suffer from the decay and loss of historical information as the video stream progresses, and they remain structurally limited by the maximum context window.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 5 sources checked
    • cites [24]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [33]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [40]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [42]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [48]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    EventMemAgent successfully internalizes complex reasoning and tool-use strategies, allowing it to adaptively retrieve information from long-term memory and use tools for more precise observations to provide accurate answers.

    “(Right) EventMemAgent successfully internalizes complex reasoning and tool-use strategies, allowing it to adaptively retrieve information from long-term memory and use tools for more precise observations to provide accurate answers.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The reservoir sampling approach effectively maximizes the temporal horizon covered within the fixed context window while mitigating short-term memory overflow.

    “Consequently, this approach effectively maximizes the temporal horizon covered within the fixed context window while mitigating short-term memory overflow.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    An active agentic framework can decompose complex video understanding tasks into multiple sub-tasks and actively, iteratively retrieve or perceive task-relevant information.

    “Instead of merely storing and recalling information passively, an agent can decompose complex video understanding tasks into multiple sub-tasks and actively, iteratively retrieve or perceive task-relevant information [13,22,30,35,49].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 5 sources checked
    • cites [13]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [22]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [30]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [35]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [49]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The training metrics collectively demonstrate the stability and effectiveness of the training framework.

    “These metrics collectively demonstrate the stability and effectiveness of our training framework.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    StreamingBench includes 12 tasks.

    “StreamingBench includes 12 tasks to”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [15]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    The long-term memory structuredly archives past observations on an event-by-event basis.

    “long-term memory structuredly archives past observations on an event-by-event basis.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Event-centric hierarchical memory preserves semantic continuity and information compactness.

    “In contrast, our eventcentric hierarchical memory (bottom) preserves semantic continuity and information compactness.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    The agent follows a multi-turn reasoning trajectory adhering to the ReAct paradigm.

    “The agent follows a multi-turn reasoning trajectory adhering to the ReAct paradigm [37]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [37]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    M3-Agent is restricted to rudimentary memory retrieval tools and its simple text-only memory module relies on fixed-length segmentation, which is suboptimal for capturing long-term temporal dynamics.

    “For instance, M3-Agent [21] is restricted to rudimentary memory retrieval tools during inference, failing to leverage a diverse toolset to unlock the potential of the agentic paradigm; moreover, its simple text-only memory module, which relies on fixed-length segmentation, remains suboptimal for capturing long-term temporal dynamics.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [21]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    The long-term memory archives both captions and visual anchors to preserve more fine-grained details.

    “Additionally, our long-term memory archives both captions and visual anchors to preserve more fine-grained details.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
40 of 40

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Online video understanding requires models to perform continuous perception and long-range reasoning within potentially infinite visual streams.

    “Online video understanding requires models to perform continuous perception and long-range reasoning within potentially infinite visual streams.”

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The fundamental challenge in online video understanding lies in the conflict between the unbounded nature of streaming media input and the limited context window of MLLMs.

    “Its fundamental challenge lies in the conflict between the unbounded nature of streaming media input and the limited context window of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs).”

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The potential of agentic intelligence in online video scenarios remains underexplored.

    “However, the potential of such agentic intelligence in online video scenarios remains underexplored.”

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The base MLLM possesses general visual reasoning capabilities.

    “while the base MLLM possesses general visual reasoning capabilities”

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The reward assigned solely based on terminal correctness is sufficient for learning tool-use strategies.

    “In our framework, the reward is assigned solely based on the terminal correctness of the final answer”

  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct has basic tool-use capabilities.

    “Since Qwen3-VL already has basic tool-use capabilities”
6 of 6

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent work constructs dense representations of the original modalities, stored in juxtaposition with text summaries, to mitigate the loss of visual information introduced through textualization.

    “recent work has begun to construct dense representations of the original modalities, which are subsequently stored in juxtaposition with their corresponding summaries in text (Wen et al., 2026; Bo et al., 2025).”

    From From Storage to Experience: A Survey on the Evolution of LLM Agent Memory Mechanisms (2026) · cites this paper as Wen et al., 2026

    Section 3.2.2 (page unavailable) says EventMemAgent stores a visual anchor—the event’s first frame—alongside a text caption to preserve finer-grained details. It does not say it constructs dense representations of the original visual modality: the high-dimensional embedding described there is derived from the caption, not the frame. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Table 2 is said to cover 12 tasks but lists 10

    Minor

    The description says Table 2 covers 12 real-time understanding tasks, but its header names ten task columns, from OP through CT; ALL is an aggregate.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Shunyu Yao, Jeffrey Zhao, Dian Yu, Nan Du, Izhak Shafran, Karthik R Narasimhan, and Yuan Cao. React: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models. In The eleventh international conference on learning representations, 2022. 4

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Wen, S., Wang, Z., Zhang, X., Huang, L., & Wu, W.
Affiliations
Beihang University (CN)
Corresponding author
Huang, Lei
ORCID
Wu, Wenjun
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2026
Pages
318-334
ISSN
0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2602.15329
arXiv
2602.15329
OpenAlex
W7130331408
Cited by
0
References
23
FWCI
0.00
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Analysis and Summarization
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
Keywords
hierarchical memory, multimodal large language models, reservoir sampling, event boundary detection, long-range context, agentic reinforcement learning, tool use

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-11-07.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-11-07.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review