CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 16Software Engineering ResearchTopic ModelingArtificial Intelligence Applications

GLM-5: from Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineering

Open access
GLM-5-Team, :, Zeng, Aohan, Lv, Xin, Hou, Zhenyu, Du, Zhengxiao, Zheng, Qinkai, Chen, Bin +179 more·2026·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2602.15763arXiv 2602.15763
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

We present GLM-5, a next-generation foundation model designed to transition the paradigm of vibe coding to agentic engineering. Building upon the agentic, reasoning, and coding (ARC) capabilities of its predecessor, GLM-5 adopts DSA to significantly reduce training and inference costs while maintaining long-context fidelity. To advance model alignment and autonomy, we implement a new asynchronous reinforcement learning infrastructure that drastically improves post-training efficiency by decoupling generation from training. Furthermore, we propose novel asynchronous agent RL algorithms that further improve RL quality, enabling the model to learn from complex, long-horizon interactions more effectively. Through these innovations, GLM-5 achieves state-of-the-art performance on major open benchmarks. Most critically, GLM-5 demonstrates unprecedented capability in real-world coding tasks, surpassing previous baselines in handling end-to-end software engineering challenges. Code, models, and more information are available at https://github.com/zai-org/GLM-5.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2602.15763

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Keep-recent-K reduction is segment-decomposable: each turn can be treated as a segment, and retention depends only on relative position within the window.

    “Thekeep-recent𝐾 example also fits into the segment-decomposable abstraction.”

    From SmoothAgent: Efficient Long-Horizon LLM-Based Agent Serving with Lookahead Context Engineering (2026) · cites this paper as [19]

  • Inserting RMSNorm between expert aggregation and up-projection reduces sensitivity of the routed branch to scale variation and consistently improves validation loss and downstream benchmarks.

    “Kimi K3 instead inserts RMSNorm [146] between expert aggregation and the up-projection.This normalization reduces the sensitivity of the routed branch to scale variation before it is combined with the full-width shared branch.Beyond stabilizing training, the additional RMSNorm consistently improves validation loss and downstream benchmarks.”

    From Kimi K3: Open Frontier Intelligence (2026) · cites this paper as [146]

    The Architecture section (p. unavailable) discusses Muon Split and attention projection weights, not RMSNorm between expert aggregation and up-projection. Searches for RMSNorm, Kimi K3, scale variation, and validation-loss improvements found no passage in our copy addressing the claimed normalization or its effects. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • WorkBuddy-Bench covers office-style deliverables in three domains (Code, Web, Office).

    “WorkBuddy-Bench (Team et al., 2026) covers office-style deliverables in three domains (Code, Web, Office).”

    From Harness^2: Recursive Agent Harnessing for an Open World (2026) · cites this paper as Team et al., 2026

    Our copy does not mention WorkBuddy-Bench or describe its domains. The benchmark discussion in §6.2 concerns CC-Bench-V2 and frontend, backend, and long-horizon engineering tasks; searches for “WorkBuddy-Bench” and “office-style deliverables Code Web Office” found no passage addressing the claimed three-domain coverage. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. A. Backlund and L. Petersson. Vending-bench: A benchmark for long-term coherence of autonomous agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.15840, 2025. · arXiv
  2. I. Badertdinov, A. Golubev, M. Nekrashevich, A. Shevtsov, S. Karasik, A. Andriushchenko, M. Trofimova, D. Litvintseva, and B. Yangel. Swe-rebench: An automated pipeline for task collection and decontaminated evaluation of software engineering agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.20411, 2025. · arXiv
  3. Y. Bai, S. Tu, J. Zhang, H. Peng, X. Wang, X. Lv, S. Cao, J. Xu, L. Hou, Y. Dong, J. Tang, and J. Li. LongBench v2: Towards deeper understanding and reasoning on realistic long-context multitasks. In ACL'25, pages 3639-3664, 2025.
  4. C. Bandi, B. Hertzberg, G. Boo, T. Polakam, J. Da, S. Hassaan, M. Sharma, A. Park, E. Hernan- dez, D. Rambado, et al. Mcp-atlas: A large-scale benchmark for tool-use competency with real mcp servers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.00933, 2026. · arXiv
  5. V. Barres, H. Dong, S. Ray, X. Si, and K. Narasimhan. τ 2 -bench: Evaluating conversational agents in a dual-control environment. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.07982, 2025. · arXiv
  6. W. Du, S. Toshniwal, B. Kisacanin, S. Mahdavi, I. Moshkov, G. Armstrong, S. Ge, E. Minasyan, F. Chen, and I. Gitman. Nemotron-math: Efficient long-context distillation of mathematical reasoning from multi-mode supervision. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.15489, 2025. · arXiv
  7. H. Ge, J. Feng, Q. Huang, F. Fu, X. Nie, L. Zuo, H. Lin, B. Cui, and X. Liu. Bytescale: Efficient scaling of llm training with a 2048k context length on more than 12,000 gpus. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.21231, 2025. · arXiv
  8. F. Gloeckle, B. Y. Idrissi, B. Rozière, D. Lopez-Paz, and G. Synnaeve. Better & faster large language models via multi-token prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.19737, 2024. · arXiv
  9. Y. Gu, L. Dong, F. Wei, and M. Huang. Minillm: Knowledge distillation of large language models. In ICLR'23, 2025.
  10. Y. Gu, Q. Hu, S. Yang, H. Xi, J. Chen, S. Han, and H. Cai. Jet-nemotron: Efficient language model with post neural architecture search. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.15884, 2025. · arXiv
  11. C. E. Jimenez, J. Yang, A. Wettig, S. Yao, K. Pei, O. Press, and K. Narasimhan. Swe-bench: Can language models resolve real-world github issues? arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.06770, 2023. · arXiv
  12. Y. Leviathan, M. Kalman, and Y. Matias. Fast inference from transformers via speculative decoding. In ICML'23, pages 19274-19286, 2023.
  13. J. Li, W. Zhao, J. Zhao, W. Zeng, H. Wu, X. Wang, R. Ge, Y. Cao, Y. Huang, W. Liu, et al. The tool decathlon: Benchmarking language agents for diverse, realistic, and long-horizon task execution. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.25726, 2025. · arXiv
  14. R. Li, J. Fu, B.-W. Zhang, T. Huang, Z. Sun, C. Lyu, G. Liu, Z. Jin, and G. Li. Taco: Topics in algorithmic code generation dataset. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.14852, 2023. · arXiv
  15. A. Liu, B. Feng, B. Wang, B. Wang, B. Liu, C. Zhao, C. Dengr, C. Ruan, D. Dai, D. Guo, et al. Deepseek-v2: A strong, economical, and efficient mixture-of-experts language model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.04434, 2024. · arXiv
  16. A. Liu, B. Feng, B. Xue, B. Wang, B. Wu, C. Lu, C. Zhao, C. Deng, C. Zhang, C. Ruan, et al. Deepseek-v3 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.19437, 2024. · arXiv
  17. A. Liu, A. Mei, B. Lin, B. Xue, B. Wang, B. Xu, B. Wu, B. Zhang, C. Lin, C. Dong, et al. Deepseek-v3. 2: Pushing the frontier of open large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.02556, 2025. · arXiv
  18. J. Liu, J. Le Tian, V. Daita, Y. Wei, Y. Ding, Y. K. Wang, J. Yang, and L. ZHANG. Repoqa: Evaluating long context code understanding. In First Workshop on Long-Context Foundation Models@ ICML 2024.
  19. M.-T. Luong, D. Hwang, H. H. Nguyen, G. Ghiasi, Y. Chervonyi, I. Seo, J. Kim, G. Bingham, J. Lee, S. Mishra, et al. Towards robust mathematical reasoning. In EMNLP'25, pages 35406- 35430, 2025.
  20. I. Moshkov, D. Hanley, I. Sorokin, S. Toshniwal, C. Henkel, B. Schifferer, W. Du, and I. Git- man. Aimo-2 winning solution: Building state-of-the-art mathematical reasoning models with openmathreasoning dataset. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.16891, 2025. · arXiv
  21. T. Patwardhan, R. Dias, E. Proehl, G. Kim, M. Wang, O. Watkins, S. P. Fishman, M. Aljubeh, P. Thacker, L. Fauconnet, et al. Gdpval: Evaluating ai model performance on real-world economically valuable tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.04374, 2025. · arXiv
  22. L. Phan, A. Gatti, Z. Han, N. Li, J. Hu, H. Zhang, C. B. C. Zhang, M. Shaaban, J. Ling, S. Shi, et al. Humanity's last exam. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.14249, 2025. · arXiv
  23. P. Qi, X. Wan, G. Huang, and M. Lin. Zero bubble pipeline parallelism. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.10241, 2023. · arXiv
  24. Z. Shao, P. Wang, Q. Zhu, R. Xu, J. Song, X. Bi, H. Zhang, M. Zhang, Y. Li, Y. Wu, et al. Deepseekmath: Pushing the limits of mathematical reasoning in open language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.03300, 2024. · arXiv
  25. K. Team, T. Bai, Y. Bai, Y. Bao, S. Cai, Y. Cao, Y. Charles, H. Che, C. Chen, G. Chen, et al. Kimi k2. 5: Visual agentic intelligence. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.02276, 2026. · arXiv
  26. L. Team, A. Shen, B. Li, B. Hu, B. Jing, C. Chen, C. Huang, C. Zhang, C. Yang, C. Lin, et al. Every step evolves: Scaling reinforcement learning for trillion-scale thinking model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.18855, 2025. · arXiv
  27. Y. Wang, S. Wang, S. Zhu, F. Fu, X. Liu, X. Xiao, H. Li, J. Li, F. Wu, and B. Cui. Flexsp: Accelerating large language model training via flexible sequence parallelism. In ASPLOS'25, pages 421-436, 2025.
  28. Z. Wang, T. Shi, J. He, M. Cai, J. Zhang, and D. Song. Cybergym: Evaluating ai agents' cyber- security capabilities with real-world vulnerabilities at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.02548, 2025. · arXiv
  29. J. Wei, Z. Sun, S. Papay, S. McKinney, J. Han, I. Fulford, H. W. Chung, A. T. Passos, W. Fedus, and A. Glaese. Browsecomp: A simple yet challenging benchmark for browsing agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.12516, 2025. · arXiv
  30. A. Yang, A. Li, B. Yang, B. Zhang, and et al. Qwen3 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.09388, 2025. · arXiv
  31. J. Yang, K. Lieret, C. E. Jimenez, A. Wettig, K. Khandpur, Y. Zhang, B. Hui, O. Press, L. Schmidt, and D. Yang. Swe-smith: Scaling data for software engineering agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.21798, 2025. · arXiv
  32. S. Yang, J. Kautz, and A. Hatamizadeh. Gated delta networks: Improving mamba2 with delta rule. In ICLR'24, 2024.
  33. S. Yao, N. Shinn, P. Razavi, and K. Narasimhan. tau-bench: A benchmark for tool-agent-user interaction in real-world domains. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.12045, 2024. · arXiv
  34. Q. Yu, Z. Zhang, R. Zhu, Y. Yuan, X. Zuo, Y. Yue, W. Dai, T. Fan, G. Liu, L. Liu, et al. Dapo: An open-source llm reinforcement learning system at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.14476, 2025. · arXiv
  35. T. Yuan, Y. Liu, X. Ye, S. Zhang, J. Tan, B. Chen, C. Song, and D. Zhang. Accelerating the training of large language models using efficient activation rematerialization and optimal hybrid parallelism. In USENIX ATC'24, pages 545-561, 2024.
  36. L. Zhang, S. He, C. Zhang, Y. Kang, B. Li, C. Xie, J. Wang, M. Wang, Y. Huang, S. Fu, E. Nallipogu, Q. Lin, Y. Dang, S. Rajmohan, and D. Zhang. Swe-bench goes live! arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.23419, 2025. · arXiv
  37. C. Zhao, C. Deng, C. Ruan, D. Dai, H. Gao, J. Li, L. Zhang, P. Huang, S. Zhou, S. Ma, et al. Insights into deepseek-v3: Scaling challenges and reflections on hardware for ai architectures. In ISCA'25, pages 1731-1745, 2025.
  38. C. Zheng, S. Liu, M. Li, X.-H. Chen, B. Yu, C. Gao, K. Dang, Y. Liu, R. Men, A. Yang, et al. Group sequence policy optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.18071, 2025. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
GLM-5-Team, :, Zeng, A., Lv, X., Hou, Z., Du, Z., Zheng, Q., Chen, B., Yin, D., Ge, C., Huang, C., Xie, C., Zhu, C., Yin, C., Wang, C., Pan, G., Zeng, H., Zhang, H., Wang, H., Chen, H., Zhang, J., Jiao, J., Guo, J., Wang, J., Du, J., Wu, J., Wang, K., Li, L., Fan, L., Zhong, L., Liu, M., Zhao, M., Du, P., Dong, Q., Lu, R., Shuang-Li, Cao, S., Liu, S., Jiang, T., Chen, X., Zhang, X., Huang, X., Dong, X., Xu, Y., Wei, Y., An, Y., Niu, Y., Zhu, Y., Wen, Y., Cen, Y., Bai, Y., Qiao, Z., Wang, Z., Wang, Z., Zhu, Z., Liu, Z., Li, Z., Wang, B., Wen, B., Huang, C., Cai, C., Yu, C., Li, C., Hu, C., Zhang, C., Zhang, D., Lin, D., Yang, D., Wang, D., Ai, D., Zhu, E., Yi, F., Chen, F., Wen, G., Sun, H., Zhao, H., Hu, H., Zhang, H., Liu, H., Zhang, H., Peng, H., Tai, H., Zhang, H., Liu, H., Wang, H., Yan, H., Ge, H., Liu, H., Chu, H., Zhao, J., Wang, J., Zhao, J., Ren, J., Wang, J., Zhang, J., Gui, J., Zhao, J., Li, J., An, J., Li, J., Yuan, J., Du, J., Liu, J., Zhi, J., Duan, J., Zhou, K., Wei, K., Wang, K., Luo, K., Zhang, L., Sha, L., Xu, L., Wu, L., Ding, L., Chen, L., Li, M., Lin, N., Ta, P., Zou, Q., Song, R., Yang, R., Tu, S., Yang, S., Wu, S., Zhang, S., Li, S., Li, S., Fan, S., Qin, W., Tian, W., Zhang, W., Yu, W., Liang, W., Kuang, X., Cheng, X., Li, X., Yan, X., Hu, X., Ling, X., Fan, X., Xia, X., Zhang, X., Zhang, X., Pan, X., Zou, X., Zhang, X., Liu, Y., Wu, Y., Li, Y., Wang, Y., Zhu, Y., Tan, Y., Zhou, Y., Pan, Y., Zhang, Y., Su, Y., Geng, Y., Yan, Y., Tan, Y., Bi, Y., Shen, Y., Yang, Y., Li, Y., Liu, Y., Wang, Y., Li, Y., Wu, Y., Zhang, Y., Duan, Y., Zhang, Y., Liu, Z., Jiang, Z., Yan, Z., Zhang, Z., Wei, Z., Chen, Z., Feng, Z., Yao, Z., Chai, Z., Wang, Z., Zhang, Z., Xu, B., Huang, M., Wang, H., Li, J., Dong, Y., & Tang, J.
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2026
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2602.15763
arXiv
2602.15763
OpenAlex
W7130402983
Cited by
6
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 6
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
Baidu
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
Keywords
foundation models, vibe coding, asynchronous reinforcement learning, long-context understanding, model alignment, autonomous agents, software engineering tasks, code generation, training cost reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review