An Empirical Study of Harness Design for Coding Agents
Open accessAbstract
Coding harnesses shape how autonomous coding agents translate model capabilities into long-horizon software-engineering performance, yet existing work typically evaluates harnesses as monolithic systems, leaving the effectiveness of individual components unclear. To enable component-level comparisons, we study this question with a lightweight coding harness whose execution loop is fixed while three components are varied: planning, action space, and context management. Across four models evaluated on SWE-Bench Verified and Terminal-Bench 2.1, we evaluate 176 matched settings spanning five context-management strategies, four context-window budgets, and targeted ablations of planning and action space. We find that: (1) Context management becomes increasingly valuable as the context-window budget tightens, with most of its benefit coming from preventing context-overflow failures. (2) Staging rule-based elision before LLM-based summarization provides the strongest overall efficiency among the context-management strategies, whereas making elided content recoverable adds machinery that models rarely use and yields no accuracy gain. (3) Planning shifts from an accuracy scaffold for weaker models to a cost saver for stronger models, with little change in accuracy. (4) Predefined tools improve performance for models with weaker bash proficiency, whereas bash-capable models can operate effectively with a bash-only interface and achieve substantially lower cost, especially on command-line-centric tasks. Trajectory-level analysis explains these effects: context management extends execution trajectories without substantially altering agent behavior, planning changes where trajectories stop, and the action space changes the granularity at which code is written. These findings inform model- and budget-aware harness design and provide a modular framework for evaluating future harness components.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This paper builds a lightweight coding harness with a fixed ReAct loop and varies planning, action space, and context management across four models and two long-horizon coding benchmarks, evaluating 176 matched settings. It finds that context management matters most under tight context budgets, T4 (staged elision before summarization) gives the best cost profile, planning shifts from accuracy scaffold to cost saver as capability rises, and predefined tools help bash-weak models while bash-only benefits bash-capable models.
Key findings
- Context management’s value shrinks as the context-window budget expands: the model-averaged managed-vs-T0 success gap falls from 35.7 to 15.9, 5.5, and 2.7 percentage points on SWE-Bench and from 9.5 to 7.5, 4.8, and 2.8 on Terminal-Bench across 32k, 64k, 96k, and 128k. T0 overflow rates fall from 78.7% to 8.7% on SWE-Bench and from 61.0% to 12.1% on Terminal-Bench, while all managed tiers have zero overflow failures.
- T4 achieves success rates comparable to T1–T3 with the lowest cost in seven of eight model-benchmark panels and the lowest mean cost per task at every window budget averaged across the eight pairs. Recall (M2) is rarely used: among 64 T2 and T4 settings, 36 (56.3%) never call `recall_event`, the median invocation rate is zero, and the equal-weight mean falls from 0.540 calls per task at 32k to 0.069, 0.011, and 0.007 at 64k, 96k, and 128k; T2 vs. T1 has an equal-weight mean difference of −0.36 percentage points.
- Planning increases success for Nemotron-3 30B by 11.6 percentage points on SWE-Bench and 4.5 points on Terminal-Bench at higher cost, but for Nemotron-3 550B and Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B it reduces SWE-Bench cost by approximately 30% and 32% with success decreases of 2.0 and 0.4 percentage points. Without planning, 68.6% of Nemotron-3 30B SWE-Bench runs terminate without an edit and 58.4% stall at localization, versus 27.8% and 10.4% with planning.
- Predefined tools raise Nemotron-3 30B success by 15.0% on SWE-Bench and 10.1% on Terminal-Bench, while bash-only improves Nemotron-3 550B success by 3.6% on SWE-Bench and 5.6% on Terminal-Bench and reduces cost by 53% and 30%, respectively. Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B shows a task-dependent reversal: the full tool set improves SWE-Bench success by 23.2%, but bash-only adds 6.7% on Terminal-Bench.
Methods
- The authors build a modular coding harness following a ReAct loop, holding the execution loop and supporting components fixed while varying planning, action space, and context management. Models are three Nemotron-3 sizes (30B, 120B, 550B) and Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B; benchmarks are SWE-Bench Verified (500 issues) and Terminal-Bench 2.1 (89 tasks).
- Context management compares five tiers (T0–T4) under 32k, 64k, 96k, and 128k budgets, yielding 20 settings per model-benchmark pair; planning-off and bash-only ablations at T4/128k add two more, for 176 total settings. Analysis uses success rate, mean cost per task, two-sided exact McNemar tests on task-paired outcomes, and Benjamini-Hochberg FDR control at 0.05.
- Trajectory-level analysis uses LLM-judge annotations (GPT-5.5, high reasoning effort, temperature 0.6) validated against three human annotators over 15,610 labeled units, with approximately 94.2% raw agreement and a weighted mean Cohen’s κ of 0.929.
Limitations
- Stated: results estimate conditional effects of the specific harness components and implementations studied, not a universally optimal harness. Planning uses one prompt and update mechanism; context management uses one threshold-based policy with fixed compaction settings; the action-space intervention is a bundled interface change that jointly varies tool availability, interface-specific prompts, file-state tracking, and automatic post-edit diagnostics, so it does not isolate tool count or action granularity.
- Stated: coverage and statistical power are limited. Planning and action space are ablated only under the default T4/128k configuration due to limited computing resources, and a full factorial study would be needed to test other combinations; each setting is run once per task, and Terminal-Bench has only 89 tasks, so many Terminal-Bench contrasts do not reach significance under the paired McNemar test.
- Stated: external validity is bounded by the models and tasks evaluated—three Nemotron-3 sizes and Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B on two long-horizon coding benchmarks, with SWE-Bench Verified being Python-only; model size is an imperfect proxy for capability, and crossover points should be validated before transfer. Evident from the text: trajectory-level conclusions rely on LLM-judge annotations, though the paper reports validation against human labels.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
4 of 23 cited sources checked · 2 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation§ AnEmpirical Study of Harness Design for Coding Agents · p. 1
Many existing studies evaluate coding harnesses as complete systems, leaving the effectiveness of individual components unclear.
“yet existing work typically evaluates harnesses as monolithic systems, leaving the effectiveness of individual components unclear.”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
“Despite the empirical success of coding harnesses, many existing studies evaluate them as complete systems (Wang et al., 2025; Wong et al., 2025; Xia et al., 2024; Arora et al., 2024).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites Wang et al., 2025 source
The Introduction describes prior prompt-engineering approaches, and §4.1 tests the effects of removing particular features from selected approaches. Neither passage says that existing studies typically evaluate coding harnesses as monolithic systems or leave individual components’ effectiveness unclear. Searches for harnesses, monolithic evaluation, and prior component-level analysis found no passage making that claim. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Wong et al., 2025 source
- cites Xia et al., 2024 source
The Experimental Setup (p. 9) compares 26 agent-based approaches as baselines and says most closed-source baselines provide only final patches, so their steps cannot be verified. Section 5.2 (p. 12) examines the contributions of AGENTLESS’s individual components. These passages support a concern about limited visibility into some systems, but do not establish that existing work typically evaluates harnesses only as monolithic systems or leaves component effectiveness unclear across the field. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
- Premisecitation§ 1 Introduction · p. 2
Changing the harness while holding the model fixed can substantially change model performance.
“These choices are not incidental implementation details: changing the harness while holding the model fixed can substantially change model performance (Yang et al., 2024; Wang et al., 2024; Lewis, 2026).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked - Findingreasoning§ 1 Introduction · p. 3
For weaker models, planning raises success at additional cost.
“For weaker models, planning keeps the trajectory alive long enough to attempt an edit, raising success at additional cost;”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ AnEmpirical Study of Harness Design for Coding Agents · p. 1
Planning changes where trajectories stop.
“planning changes where trajectories stop”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ AnEmpirical Study of Harness Design for Coding Agents · p. 1
Staging rule-based elision before LLM-based summarization (T4) provides the strongest overall efficiency among the context-management strategies.
“Staging rule-based elision before LLM-based summarization provides the strongest overall efficiency among the context-management strategies, whereas making elided content recoverable adds machinery that models rarely use and yields no accuracy gain.”
- Also stated in: § 3.2 Main Results · p. 7 · plain
“T4 offers the best accuracy-cost trade-off among context-management strategies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 3.2 Main Results · p. 7 · plain
- Findingreasoning§ 1 Introduction · p. 3
Predefined tools improve performance for models with weaker bash proficiency.
“Predefined tools improve performance for bash-weak models, while bash-only interfaces reduce cost for bash-capable models.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ AnEmpirical Study of Harness Design for Coding Agents · p. 1
Context management becomes increasingly valuable as the context-window budget tightens.
“Context management becomes increasingly valuable as the context-window budget tightens, with most of its benefit coming from preventing context-overflow failures.”
- Also stated in: § 3.2 Main Results · p. 7 · plain
“The value of context management grows as the context-window budget shrinks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 3.2 Main Results · p. 7 · plain
- Findingown data§ 3.2 Main Results · p. 7
The value of context management, defined as the success-rate gap between managed tiers (T1-T4) and no management (T0), shrinks as the context-window budget increases.
“The value of context management grows as the context-window budget shrinks.”
- Also stated in: § 3.2 Main Results · p. 7 · plain
“Averaged across the models, the managed-T0 gap shrinks steadily across 32k, 64k, 96k, and 128k windows: from 35 . 7 to 15 . 9 , 5 . 5 , and 2 . 7 percentage points on SWE-Bench, and from 9 . 5 to 7 . 5 , 4 . 8 , and 2 . 8 on Terminal-Bench (Tables 3 and 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 3.2 Main Results · p. 7 · plain
- Findingown data§ AnEmpirical Study of Harness Design for Coding Agents · p. 1
Context management extends execution trajectories without substantially altering agent behavior.
“context management extends execution trajectories without substantially altering agent behavior”
- Also stated in: § 4 Analysis · p. 13 · plain
“Context management extends execution trajectories without substantially altering agent behavior.”
- Also stated in: § 4 Analysis · p. 13 · hedged
“These results indicate that context management primarily extends execution trajectories without substantially altering agent behavior.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 4 Analysis · p. 13 · plain
- Findingown data§ 3.2 Main Results · p. 7
All managed tiers have zero overflow failures throughout.
“while all managed tiers have zero overflow failures throughout.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ AnEmpirical Study of Harness Design for Coding Agents · p. 1
The action space changes the granularity at which code is written.
“the action space changes the granularity at which code is written”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 4 Analysis · p. 13
At 32k, the tiers differ primarily in trajectory length.
“At 32k, the tiers differ primarily in trajectory length.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 4 Analysis · p. 13
Disabling planning reduces the median SWE-Bench trajectory length from 40 to 5 turns for Nemotron-3 30B.
“Disabling planning reduces the median SWE-Bench trajectory length from 40 to 5 turns.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 4 Analysis · p. 13
At 128k, differences across tiers largely diminish.
“At 128k, differences across tiers largely diminish.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 4 Analysis · p. 14
The phase composition attributes most of this reduction to verification rather than localization or fixing.
“The phase composition attributes most of this reduction to verification rather than localization or fixing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.2 Main Results · p. 8
With comparable accuracy across context-management strategies, T4 achieves the best overall cost profile by using cheap early elision to reduce reliance on LLM summarization.
“Takeaway: With comparable accuracy across context-management strategies, T4 achieves the best overall cost profile by using cheap early elision to reduce reliance on LLM summarization.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion · p. 15 · plain
“Context management matters most under tight context-window budgets, and among its policies T4 achieves the lowest aggregate cost at broadly similar success rates by applying rule-based elision before selective LLM summarization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion · p. 15 · plain
- Findingown data§ 3.2 Main Results · p. 7
T4 has the lowest average peak-context ratio at all four window budgets across model-benchmark pairs.
“Across model-benchmark pairs, T4 has the lowest average peak-context ratio at all four window budgets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.2 Main Results · p. 7
T4 invokes M3 less often than T3 on average at every budget.
“it also invokes M3 less often than T3 on average at every budget.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.2 Main Results · p. 7
T4 has the lowest mean cost per task at every window budget, averaged across the eight model-benchmark pairs.
“Averaged across the eight model-benchmark pairs, T4 has the lowest mean cost per task at every window budget (Figure 5(c)).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.2 Main Results · p. 10
The predefined tool set benefits the weaker Nemotron-3 models most.
“Figure 7 shows that the predefined tool set benefits the weaker Nemotron-3 models most (Tables 3 and 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tables 3 and 4
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingown data§ 3.2 Main Results · p. 7
T4 invokes M1 less often than T1 and T2 at 32k and 64k and at comparably low rates at larger windows.
“T4 invokes M1 less often than T1 and T2 at 32k and 64k and at comparably low rates at larger windows;”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 4 Analysis · p. 14
Nemotron-3 30B shows the opposite pattern: by preventing premature termination, planning increases cost by 75%.
“Nemotron-3 30B shows the opposite pattern: by preventing premature termination, planning increases cost by 75%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 3.2 Main Results · p. 9
Every managed tier overflows on exactly zero tasks at every context-window budget.
“Every managed tier overflows on exactly zero tasks at every budget, so a single overflow curve suffices.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ C.3.1 Failure-Stage Results · p. 29
For Nemotron-3 30B, more than half of unresolved runs fail at file localization.
“for Nemotron-3 30B, more than half of unresolved runs fail at file localization”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ C.5 Trajectory-Level Statistics at 128k · p. 32
For Nemotron-3 550B, the SWE-Bench median trajectory length stays between 70 and 74 turns across T0-T4.
“and for Nemotron-3 550B between 70 and 74 turns”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ C.5 Trajectory-Level Statistics at 128k · p. 32
Under bash-only, the median largest edit grows from 18 to 54 lines for Nemotron-3 550B.
“the median largest edit grows from 18 to 54 lines for Nemotron-3 550B”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ C.5 Trajectory-Level Statistics at 128k · p. 32
Context-management tiers leave the trajectory shape almost unchanged at 128k.
“Context-management tiers leave the trajectory shape almost unchanged at 128k.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ C.5 Trajectory-Level Statistics at 128k · p. 32
On Terminal-Bench, the create-or-replace share of file-writing actions rises under bash-only for every model.
“On Terminal-Bench, the create-or-replace share of file-writing actions rises under bash-only for every model”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ C.2 Judge Setup and Human Validation · p. 29
Overall judge-human agreement is high across annotators.
“Overall judge-human agreement is high across annotators.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ C.3.1 Failure-Stage Results · p. 29
Removing the predefined tools from Nemotron-3 30B pushes the file-localization share to 76.6%.
“removing planning or the predefined tools from Nemotron-3 30B pushes the file-localization share from 56.3% to 73.8% and 76.6%, respectively”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ C.3.1 Failure-Stage Results · p. 29
In the Mistral bash-only setting, file-localization failures rise from 16.0% to 41.4%.
“the Mistral bash-only setting is the only strong-model configuration in which file-localization failures rise sharply, from 16.0% to 41.4%”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ C.5 Trajectory-Level Statistics at 128k · p. 32
Bash-only reduces re-patching for all four models.
“Bash-only reduces re-patching for all four models”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ C.5 Trajectory-Level Statistics at 128k · p. 32
Under bash-only, the median largest edit decreases from 87 to 68 lines for Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B.
“and decreases from 87 to 68 lines for Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B, whose edits are already large under the predefined tools.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 4 Analysis · p. 14
On Terminal-Bench, bash-only shifts file-writing toward coarser create-or-replace actions, increasing their share from 28% to 64% for 30B, 39% to 76% for 120B, 51% to 76% for 550B, and 28% to 57% for Mistral.
“On Terminal-Bench, bash-only also shifts file-writing toward coarser create-or-replace actions, increasing their share from 28% to 64% for 30B, 39% to 76% for 120B, 51% to 76% for 550B, and 28% to 57% for Mistral.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ C.3.1 Failure-Stage Results · p. 29
Across the context-management tiers, the stage distribution changes little.
“Across the context-management tiers, the stage distribution changes little”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ C.3.1 Failure-Stage Results · p. 29
For Nemotron-3 550B and Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B, the majority of unresolved runs reach the correct file and lines but fail at patch implementation.
“whereas for Nemotron-3 550B and MistralMedium-3.5-128B, the majority reach the correct file and lines but fail at patch implementation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ C.5 Trajectory-Level Statistics at 128k · p. 32
The Nemotron-3 30B bash-only setting has the highest without-code termination rate of any configuration (22.5%).
“the Nemotron-3 30B bash-only setting has the highest without-code termination rate of any configuration (22.5%)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ C.5 Trajectory-Level Statistics at 128k · p. 32
The effect of bash-only on edit size is model-dependent.
“but its effect on edit size is model-dependent”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ C.3.1 Failure-Stage Results · p. 29
Removing planning from Nemotron-3 30B pushes the file-localization share from 56.3% to 73.8%.
“removing planning or the predefined tools from Nemotron-3 30B pushes the file-localization share from 56.3% to 73.8% and 76.6%, respectively”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ C.5 Trajectory-Level Statistics at 128k · p. 32
Removing planning collapses the Nemotron-3 30B SWE-Bench trajectory to a median of 5 turns.
“Removing planning collapses the Nemotron-3 30B SWE-Bench trajectory to a median of 5 turns”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ C.5 Trajectory-Level Statistics at 128k · p. 32
For Nemotron-3 30B, the SWE-Bench median trajectory length stays between 39 and 42 turns across T0-T4.
“for Nemotron-3 30B the SWE-Bench median stays between 39 and 42 turns”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ C.5 Trajectory-Level Statistics at 128k · p. 32
Under bash-only, the median largest edit is essentially unchanged for Nemotron-3 120B.
“is essentially unchanged for Nemotron-3 120B”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ C.5 Trajectory-Level Statistics at 128k · p. 32
Removing planning pushes the Nemotron-3 30B without-edit termination rate from 27.8% to 68.6%.
“and pushes the without-edit termination rate from 27.8% to 68.6%”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ C.5 Trajectory-Level Statistics at 128k · p. 32
Under bash-only, the median largest edit shrinks from 26 to 13 lines for Nemotron-3 30B.
“shrinks from 26 to 13 lines for Nemotron-3 30B”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ C.3.1 Failure-Stage Results · p. 29
The Mistral bash-only setting is the only strong-model configuration in which file-localization failures rise sharply.
“the Mistral bash-only setting is the only strong-model configuration in which file-localization failures rise sharply, from 16.0% to 41.4%”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data§ 3.2 Main Results · p. 7
Context management reduces the sensitivity of task success to context-window capacity, enabling effective execution under tighter context budgets.
“Context management reduces the sensitivity of task success to context-window capacity, enabling effective execution under tighter context budgets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ AnEmpirical Study of Harness Design for Coding Agents · p. 1
Most of context management's benefit comes from preventing context-overflow failures.
“Context management becomes increasingly valuable as the context-window budget tightens, with most of its benefit coming from preventing context-overflow failures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ 3.2 Main Results · p. 7
Context management is valuable largely because it prevents premature truncation when the window binds.
“Thus, context management is valuable largely because it prevents premature truncation when the window binds;”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ 4 Analysis · p. 14
Planning's cost effect on Terminal-Bench depends on how it reshapes the trajectory-length distribution.
“Planning's cost effect on Terminal-Bench depends on how it reshapes the trajectory-length distribution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 3.2 Main Results · p. 11
The predefined tool set scaffolds Nemotron-3 30B by exposing an action vocabulary it can invoke reliably.
“The predefined tool set scaffolds Nemotron-3 30B by exposing an action vocabulary it can invoke reliably.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ 4 Analysis · p. 14
Planning primarily improves stopping behavior by reducing redundant post-edit verification, rather than accelerating localization or repair.
“These results suggest that planning primarily improves stopping behavior by reducing redundant post-edit verification, rather than accelerating localization or repair.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ 3.2 Main Results · p. 11
For Nemotron-3 550B, the predefined tool set appears to add action-selection and interaction overhead rather than useful scaffolding.
“For this model, the predefined tool set appears to add action-selection and interaction overhead rather than useful scaffolding.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ 1 Introduction · p. 2
The findings provide transferable diagnostics for future models facing the same context, action space, and planning tradeoffs.
“Our findings therefore provide transferable diagnostics for future models facing the same context, action space, and planning tradeoffs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 4 Analysis · p. 14
The balance between these effects determines the model-specific cost changes in Figure 6(b).
“The balance between these effects determines the model-specific cost changes in Figure 6(b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Figure 6(b)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data§ 4 Analysis · p. 14
Planning shortens SWE-Bench trajectories for stronger models by reducing post-edit verification.
“Planning shortens SWE-Bench trajectories for stronger models by reducing post-edit verification.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning§ 1 Introduction · p. 2
Existing evidence does not explain which components account for differences across harnesses or when those components transfer.
“As a result, existing evidence does not explain which components account for differences across harnesses or when those components transfer.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ 3.2 Main Results · p. 11
This is consistent with the model using denser, more composite shell commands rather than distributing work across predefined actions.
“This is consistent with the model using denser, more composite shell commands rather than distributing work across predefined actions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ 4 Analysis · p. 13
Planning sustains the weakest model's trajectory long enough to attempt an edit.
“Planning sustains the weakest model's trajectory long enough to attempt an edit.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 3.2 Main Results · p. 11
Because the bash-only registry lacks these tools, the harness cannot resolve emitted calls into executable actions.
“Because the bash-only registry lacks these tools, the harness cannot resolve emitted calls into executable actions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 3.2 Main Results · p. 11
Without predefined tools, the model falls back on tool-call patterns acquired during training rather than translating intended operations into bash.
“Without predefined tools, the model falls back on tool-call patterns acquired during training rather than translating intended operations into bash .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Limitations · p. 16
The external validity of the conclusions is bounded by the models and tasks evaluated.
“Last, the external validity of our conclusions is bounded by the models and tasks evaluated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 6 Conclusion · p. 15
Harness design is a conditional systems problem in which each component should be selected for the target model, task type, and resource budget rather than adopted as a default.
“Harness design is thus a conditional systems problem in which each component should be selected for the target model, task type, and resource budget rather than adopted as a default.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data§ C.2 Judge Setup and Human Validation · p. 29
The LLM judge is closely aligned with independent human annotations across both benchmark-specific action taxonomies and failure-stage labels.
“These results indicate that the LLM judge is closely aligned with independent human annotations across both benchmark-specific action taxonomies and failure-stage labels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The 200-trajectory sample used for human validation is representative of the full set of experimental trajectories.
- Interpretationown data§ C.2 Judge Setup and Human Validation · p. 29
The judge-human agreement results support the use of judge-produced trajectory annotations for scaling the behavioral analysis in §4 to the full set of experimental trajectories.
“They support the use of judge-produced trajectory annotations for scaling the behavioral analysis in §4 to the full set of experimental trajectories.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The 200-trajectory sample used for human validation is representative of the full set of experimental trajectories.
- Interpretationown data§ C.3.1 Failure-Stage Results · p. 29
The tier comparison at 128k reflects small differences in how many runs fail rather than where they fail.
“so the tier comparison at 128k reflects small differences in how many runs fail rather than where they fail.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Limitations · p. 16
The results estimate the conditional effects of the specific harness components and implementations studied here rather than identifying a universally optimal harness.
“First, our results estimate the conditional effects of the specific harness components and implementations studied here rather than identifying a universally optimal harness.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ C.3.1 Failure-Stage Results · p. 29
The 23.2-point drop under bash-only for Mistral originates mainly before the repair step.
“which indicates that its 23.2-point drop under bash-only originates mainly before the repair step.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning§ Limitations · p. 16
The action-space intervention is a bundled interface change that jointly varies tool availability, interface-specific prompts, file-state tracking, and automatic post-edit diagnostics, so it does not isolate the effect of tool count or action granularity from the other properties of the interface.
“The action-space intervention is a bundled interface change that jointly varies tool availability, interface-specific prompts, file-state tracking, and automatic post-edit diagnostics, so it does not isolate the effect of tool count or action granularity from the other properties of the interface.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ C.5 Trajectory-Level Statistics at 128k · p. 32
The high without-code termination rate of Nemotron-3 30B bash-only is consistent with the out-of-interface tool emissions described in §3.2.
“consistent with the out-of-interface tool emissions described in §3.2.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data§ Limitations · p. 16
Model size is only an imperfect proxy for capability, since differences in training, prior exposure to tool interfaces, and native shell proficiency may also contribute to the observed trends.
“Model size is only an imperfect proxy for capability, since differences in training, prior exposure to tool interfaces, and native shell proficiency may also contribute to the observed trends, as Mistral's benchmark-dependent interface preference shows.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ C.5 Trajectory-Level Statistics at 128k · p. 32
The stability of trajectory shape and termination behavior across context-management tiers is why §4 extends execution trajectories without substantially altering agent behavior at 128k.
“This stability is why §4 extends execution trajectories without substantially altering agent behavior at 128k”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ C.5 Trajectory-Level Statistics at 128k · p. 32
The tier-dependent differences appear only when the window binds, as in the 32k profiles.
“the tier-dependent differences appear only when the window binds, as in the 32k profiles (Figures 32 and 36).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ C.3.1 Failure-Stage Results · p. 29
The increase in file-localization share when removing planning or predefined tools from Nemotron-3 30B is consistent with the premature-termination behavior described in §4.
“consistent with the premature-termination behavior described in §4.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data§ C.2 Judge Setup and Human Validation · p. 29
The LLM-judge annotations were validated with three human annotators.
“We validate the LLM-judge annotations with three human annotators.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 20
- May combine two claims. 75
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ 5.2 Coding Harness · p. 15The harness, not the model alone, governs performance.
“Research on their design has shown that the harness, not the model alone, governs performance (Yang et al., 2024).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Yang et al., 2024 source
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ AnEmpirical Study of Harness Design for Coding Agents · p. 1Making elided content recoverable adds machinery that models rarely use and yields no accuracy gain.
“whereas making elided content recoverable adds machinery that models rarely use and yields no accuracy gain.”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 3 · plain
“In contrast, the recall mechanism that makes elision reversible is rarely invoked and does not improve accuracy over elision alone.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 3 · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3.2 Main Results · p. 7T4 achieves success rates comparable to T1-T3, with the lowest cost in seven of eight model-benchmark panels.
“Figure 4 shows that T4 achieves success rates comparable to T1-T3, with the lowest cost in seven of eight model-benchmark panels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 1 Introduction · p. 3For stronger models, planning mainly removes redundant post-edit verification, lowering cost with only small changes in accuracy.
“for the stronger models, it mainly removes redundant post-edit verification, lowering cost with only small changes in accuracy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ AnEmpirical Study of Harness Design for Coding Agents · p. 1Bash-capable models can operate effectively with a bash-only interface and achieve substantially lower cost, especially on command-line-centric tasks.
“whereas bash-capable models can operate effectively with a bash-only interface and achieve substantially lower cost, especially on command-line-centric tasks.”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 3 · plain
“Predefined tools reduce reliance on shell commands, whereas bash-capable models can combine multiple operations per call.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 3 · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3.2 Main Results · p. 7At 32k, T1 and T2 trajectories still reach approximately the full window, whereas T3 and T4 keep peak context substantially below it.
“Figure 5(a) shows that at 32k, T1 and T2 trajectories still reach approximately the full window, whereas T3 and T4 keep peak context substantially below it.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3.2 Main Results · p. 7The model-averaged T0 overflow rate falls from 78.7% to 8.7% on SWE-Bench and from 61.0% to 12.1% on Terminal-Bench across 32k to 128k budgets.
“Across these budgets, the model-averaged T0 overflow rate falls from 78 . 7% to 8 . 7% on SWE-Bench and from 61 . 0% to 12 . 1% on Terminal-Bench, while all managed tiers have zero overflow failures throughout.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3.2 Main Results · p. 11Unlike 30B, 120B does not benefit from longer trajectories: the predefined tool set shortens average runs from 101 to 77 turns on SWE-Bench and 96 to 70 on Terminal-Bench without increasing cost.
“Unlike 30B, 120B does not benefit from longer trajectories: the predefined tool set shortens average runs from 101 to 77 turns on SWE-Bench and 96 to 70 on Terminal-Bench without increasing cost.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3.2 Main Results · p. 9Planning improves success rate for the weaker model and saves cost for the stronger models.
“Planning improves success rate for the weaker model and saves cost for the stronger models.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion · p. 15 · plain
“Planning improves success at additional cost for weaker models but mainly reduces cost, with small decreases in success rate, for stronger models.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion · p. 15 · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 4 Analysis · p. 13For Nemotron-3 120B, trajectory-length distributions nearly overlap, consistent with the absence of an accuracy gain.
“For Nemotron-3 120B, trajectory-length distributions nearly overlap, consistent with the absence of an accuracy gain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3.2 Main Results · p. 9For Nemotron-3 30B, planning increases success rate by 11.6 percentage points on SWE-Bench and 4.5 points on Terminal-Bench, at higher cost on both benchmarks.
“For Nemotron-3 30B, planning increases success rate by 11 . 6 percentage points on SWE-Bench and 4 . 5 points on Terminal-Bench, at higher cost on both benchmarks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3.2 Main Results · p. 1132.8% of Mistral's bash-only SWE-Bench runs end without editing a file, versus 1.2% with the full tool set.
“Additional bash-only failures arise before repair: 32.8% of Mistral's bash-only SWE-Bench runs end without editing a file, versus 1.2% with the full tool set (Table 12), and among unresolved runs, the share never reaching the correct file rises from 16.0”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Table 12
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 4 Analysis · p. 13Without planning, 68.6% of Nemotron-3 30B runs terminate without an edit and 58.4% terminate during Localize, compared with 27.8% and 10.4%, respectively, with planning.
“Without planning, 68.6% of runs terminate without an edit and 58.4% terminate during Localize, compared with 27.8% and 10.4%, respectively, with planning (Table 6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Table 6
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3.2 Main Results · p. 9On SWE-Bench, Nemotron-3 550B and Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B costs fall by approximately 30% and 32%, respectively, while success rates decrease by 2.0 and 0.4 percentage points.
“On SWE-Bench, their costs fall by approximately 30% and 32% , respectively, while success rates decrease by 2 . 0 and 0 . 4 percentage points (Tables 3 and 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tables 3 and 4
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3.2 Main Results · p. 8Recall (M2) is rarely used and does not improve accuracy over elision alone.
“Recall (M2) is rarely used and does not improve accuracy over elision alone.”
- Also stated in: § 3.2 Main Results · p. 8 · hedged
“These results suggest that lossless storage adds machinery most models seldom use, and retrieving elided observations does not consistently translate into completed tasks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § 3.2 Main Results · p. 8 · hedged
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 4 Analysis · p. 13Without context management, the proportion of active SWE-Bench runs declines sharply, with median lengths of 20-30 turns across the four models.
“Without context management, the proportion of active SWE-Bench runs declines sharply, with median lengths of 20-30 turns across the four models.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 4 Analysis · p. 14The effect is smaller for Nemotron-3 550B (3.6%), whose exploratory tail is less compressed, but larger for Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B (about 40%), where both medium- and long-running trajectories shorten.
“The effect is smaller for Nemotron-3 550B (3.6%), whose exploratory tail is less compressed, but larger for Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B (about 40%), where both medium- and long-running trajectories shorten.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3.2 Main Results · p. 11The full tool set improves Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B success by 23.2% on SWE-Bench, but bash-only adds 6.7% on Terminal-Bench.
“The full tool set improves success by 23 . 2% on SWE-Bench, but bash-only adds 6 . 7% on Terminal-Bench.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3.2 Main Results · p. 11With all tools, Mistral issues 71.9% of Terminal-Bench workspace actions via bash versus 40.4% on SWE-Bench, while predefined-tool use falls from 31.4 to 13.1 calls per task.
“Figure 7(c) explains the reversal: with all tools, Mistral issues 71 . 9% of Terminal-Bench workspace actions via bash versus 40 . 4% on SWE-Bench, while predefined-tool use falls from 31 . 4 to 13 . 1 calls per task.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 4 Analysis · p. 13Most runs terminate during the Localize phase, and few reach Verify.
“Most runs terminate during the Localize phase, and few reach Verify (Figure 32).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Figure 32
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 3.2 Main Results · p. 11Bash-only trajectories issue 32% fewer calls on SWE-Bench and 24% fewer on Terminal-Bench.
“Bash-only trajectories issue 32% fewer calls on SWE-Bench and 24% fewer on Terminal-Bench.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3.2 Main Results · p. 10The predefined tool set scaffolds weaker models, while bash-only can benefit stronger ones.
“The predefined tool set scaffolds weaker models, while bash-only can benefit stronger ones.”
- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion · p. 15 · boosted
“Predefined tools raise success rates for models with weak bash control, whereas bash-only yields higher success at lower cost for bash-capable models, most clearly on shell-centric task types.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § 6 Conclusion · p. 15 · boosted
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 4 Analysis · p. 14For Nemotron-3 550B on Terminal-Bench, switching from the full tool set to bash-only shortens the median trajectory from 47 to 31 actions while raising the share of Write-code actions from 16% to 27%.
“Figure 9 shows this most clearly for Nemotron-3 550B on Terminal-Bench: switching from the full tool set to bash-only shortens the median trajectory from 47 to 31 actions while raising the share of Write-code actions from 16% to 27%, so a larger fraction of a shorter trajectory is spent producing code.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 4 Analysis · p. 14Planning reduces the median trajectory length from 108 to 74 turns for Nemotron-3 550B and from 68 to 53 turns for Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B.
“Figure 8 shows that planning reduces the median trajectory length from 108 to 74 turns for Nemotron-3 550B and from 68 to 53 turns for Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3.2 Main Results · p. 9For Nemotron-3 550B and Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B, planning reduces cost on both benchmarks, accompanied by small decreases in success rate.
“For Nemotron-3 550B and Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B, planning reduces cost on both benchmarks, accompanied by small decreases in success rate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3.2 Main Results · p. 11For Nemotron-3 120B, accuracy gains shrink to 1.6% on SWE-Bench and 4.5% on Terminal-Bench but accompany more efficient execution.
“For Nemotron-3 120B, accuracy gains shrink to 1 . 6% on SWE-Bench and 4 . 5% on Terminal-Bench but accompany more efficient execution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 4 Analysis · p. 13Median trajectory lengths range from 39-42 turns for Nemotron-3 30B and 70-74 turns for Nemotron-3 550B.
“Median trajectory lengths range from 39-42 turns for Nemotron-3 30B and 70-74 turns for Nemotron-3 550B.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3.2 Main Results · p. 10For Nemotron-3 30B, the predefined tool set raises success by 15.0% on SWE-Bench and 10.1% on Terminal-Bench.
“For Nemotron-3 30B, the predefined tool set raises success by 15.0% on SWE-Bench and 10.1% on Terminal-Bench.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3.2 Main Results · p. 11For Nemotron-3 550B, bash-only improves success rate by 3.6% on SWE-Bench and 5.6% on Terminal-Bench while reducing cost by 53% and 30%, respectively.
“For Nemotron-3 550B, bash-only improves success rate by 3 . 6% on SWE-Bench and 5 . 6% on Terminal-Bench while reducing cost by 53% and 30% , respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3.2 Main Results · p. 9Planning increases turns, tool calls, and average input tokens per call for Nemotron-3 30B on both benchmarks.
“Planning increases turns, tool calls, and average input tokens per call for Nemotron-3 30B on both benchmarks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 4 Analysis · p. 14Planning has two opposing effects: it extends trajectories that would otherwise terminate prematurely, while truncating the tail of excessively long runs.
“Figure 9 shows that planning has two opposing effects: it extends trajectories that would otherwise terminate prematurely, while truncating the tail of excessively long runs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3.2 Main Results · p. 8Even the heaviest-use configuration, Nemotron-3 30B on Terminal-Bench at 32k under T2, averages 4.326 calls per task and scores 3.37% below T1.
“Even the heaviest-use configuration, Nemotron-3 30B on Terminal-Bench at 32k under T2, averages 4 . 326 calls per task and scores 3 . 37% below T1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 4 Analysis · p. 13All managed tiers extend execution while largely preserving phase ordering and proportions at comparable turns.
“All managed tiers extend execution while largely preserving phase ordering and proportions at comparable turns.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 4 Analysis · p. 14For Nemotron-3 120B, planning truncates the long-running tail and reduces cost by roughly 26%.
“For Nemotron-3 120B, planning truncates the long-running tail and reduces cost by roughly 26%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 4 Analysis · p. 13Median lengths increase to approximately 50-180 turns, depending on the model and tier, allowing runs to progress to verification.
“Median lengths increase to approximately 50-180 turns, depending on the model and tier, allowing runs to progress to verification.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 4 Analysis · p. 14Planning produces little change in the fraction of runs terminating without an edit or failing at file localization, while substantially reducing turns and tool calls.
“Consistently, planning produces little change in the fraction of runs terminating without an edit or failing at file localization (see Tables 12 and 10), while substantially reducing turns and tool calls (see Table 11).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Tables 12 and 10
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Table 11
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3.2 Main Results · p. 9For Nemotron-3 120B, planning yields no consistent success-rate gain; it increases cost on SWE-Bench but reduces it on Terminal-Bench.
“For Nemotron-3 120B, planning yields no consistent success-rate gain; it increases cost on SWE-Bench but reduces it on Terminal-Bench.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 4 Analysis · p. 13Re-patch counts differ by fewer than two per task, while the proportion of runs terminating without an edit varies by less than four percentage points for three of the four models.
“Re-patch counts differ by fewer than two per task, while the proportion of runs terminating without an edit varies by less than four percentage points for three of the four models (Figures 35 and 39; Tables 11 and 12).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Figures 35 and 39
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Tables 11 and 12
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3.2 Main Results · p. 9All three measures decrease for Mistral on both benchmarks and for Nemotron-3 550B on SWE-Bench; the changes for Nemotron-3 550B on Terminal-Bench are smaller.
“All three measures decrease for Mistral on both benchmarks and for Nemotron-3 550B on SWE-Bench; the changes for Nemotron-3 550B on Terminal-Bench are smaller.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 3.2 Main Results · p. 11On Terminal-Bench, 66% of bash-only trajectories terminate after such out-of-interface emissions, shortening the average trajectory from 71 to 15 turns.
“On Terminal-Bench, 66% of bash-only trajectories terminate after such out-of-interface emissions, shortening the average trajectory from 71 to 15 turns.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 3.2 Main Results · p. 8Across 32 model-benchmark-window comparisons, T2 outperforms T1 in 15 settings, underperforms in 14, and ties in three; the equal-weight mean difference is -0.36 percentage points (+0.40 on SWE-Bench, -1.12 on Terminal-Bench).
“Across 32 modelbenchmark-window comparisons, T2 outperforms T1 in 15 settings, underperforms in 14, and ties in three; the equal-weight mean difference is -0 . 36 percentage points ( +0 . 40 on SWE-Bench, -1 . 12 on Terminal-Bench).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ C.2 Judge Setup and Human Validation · p. 29For Terminal-Bench action labels, raw agreement ranges from 79.8% to 97.3% and κ ranges from 0.758 to 0.965.
“Terminal-Bench action labels also show substantial agreement, with raw agreement ranging from 79.8% to 97.3% and κ ranging from 0.758 to 0.965.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ C.2 Judge Setup and Human Validation · p. 29For SWE-Bench action labels, raw agreement ranges from 92.7% to 99.0% and κ ranges from 0.881 to 0.984.
“Agreement is especially strong for SWE-Bench action labels, where raw agreement ranges from 92.7% to 99.0% and κ ranges from 0.881 to 0.984.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ C.5 Trajectory-Level Statistics at 128k · p. 32Across T0-T4, re-patch counts vary by less than two per task and median edit sizes by a few lines.
“while re-patch counts vary by less than two per task and median edit sizes by a few lines.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ C.5 Trajectory-Level Statistics at 128k · p. 32Across T0-T4, the median trajectory length and the mean number of tool calls vary only within a narrow band for every model.
“Across T0-T4, the median trajectory length and the mean number of tool calls vary only within a narrow band for every model (Table 11)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ C.2 Judge Setup and Human Validation · p. 29The validation covers 15,610 labeled units in total, including 5,306 Terminal-Bench action labels, 10,254 SWE-Bench action labels, and 50 SWE-Bench failure-stage diagnoses.
“The validation covers 15,610 labeled units in total, including 5,306 Terminal-Bench action labels, 10,254 SWE-Bench action labels, and 50 SWE-Bench failure-stage diagnoses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ C.2 Judge Setup and Human Validation · p. 29Aggregating across the three splits gives approximately 94.2% raw agreement and a weighted mean Cohen's κ of 0.929.
“Aggregating across the three splits gives approximately 94.2% raw agreement and a weighted mean Cohen's κ of 0.929.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ 4 Analysis · p. 14Across all four models, bash-only reduces repeated patching of already edited files, from 3.3 to 0.4 re-patches for Nemotron-3 30B, 2.8 to 2.2 for 120B, 4.6 to 1.5 for 550B, and 3.0 to 1.3 for Mistral.
“Across all four models, bash-only reduces repeated patching of already edited files, from 3.3 to 0.4 re-patches for Nemotron-3 30B, 2.8 to 2.2 for 120B, 4.6 to 1.5 for 550B, and 3.0 to 1.3 for Mistral.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ C.5 Trajectory-Level Statistics at 128k · p. 32For Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B, removing planning lengthens the trajectory from 53 to 68 median turns while leaving the without-edit rate below 3%.
“whereas for Nemotron-3 550B and Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B it lengthens the trajectory (from 74 to 108 and from 53 to 68 median turns) while leaving the without-edit rate below 3%”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ C.5 Trajectory-Level Statistics at 128k · p. 32Termination behavior is similarly stable: the fraction of SWE-Bench runs that terminate without an edit varies across tiers by less than four points for three of the four models and by about eight points for Nemotron-3 120B.
“Termination behavior is similarly stable (Table 12): the fraction of SWE-Bench runs that terminate without an edit varies across tiers by less than four points for three of the four models and by about eight points for Nemotron-3 120B.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ C.2 Judge Setup and Human Validation · p. 29The per-split overall agreement ranges from 88.7% to 98.4%, with Cohen's κ ranging from 0.858 to 0.980.
“The per-split overall agreement ranges from 88.7% to 98.4%, with Cohen's κ ranging from 0.858 to 0.980.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ C.5 Trajectory-Level Statistics at 128k · p. 32For Nemotron-3 550B, removing planning lengthens the trajectory from 74 to 108 median turns while leaving the without-edit rate below 3%.
“whereas for Nemotron-3 550B and Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B it lengthens the trajectory (from 74 to 108 and from 53 to 68 median turns) while leaving the without-edit rate below 3%”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ C.2 Judge Setup and Human Validation · p. 29For failure-stage diagnosis, agreement ranges from 87.5% to 100.0%, with κ ranging from 0.813 to 1.000.
“For failure-stage diagnosis, agreement remains high, ranging from 87.5% to 100.0%, with κ ranging from 0.813 to 1.000.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 3.2 Main Results · p. 7As more unmanaged trajectories fit within the window, context management's marginal accuracy benefit shrinks and becomes more model-dependent.
“as more unmanaged trajectories fit within the window, its marginal accuracy benefit shrinks and becomes more model-dependent.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisereasoning§ 1 Introduction · p. 2Comparisons between complete harnesses conflate multiple mechanisms, so a performance difference between two agents does not reveal whether the gain comes from planning, tool design, context management, or their interaction with the underlying model.
“However, comparisons between complete harnesses conflate multiple mechanisms, so a performance difference between two agents does not reveal whether the gain comes from planning, tool design, context management, or their interaction with the underlying model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoning§ 2.2 Action space · p. 3The comparison between predefined tools and bash-only should be interpreted as the effect of the complete action interface, including tool availability, interface instructions, state tracking, and validation support, rather than as the isolated effect of tool count or action granularity.
“The comparison should therefore be interpreted as the effect of the complete action interface, including tool availability, interface instructions, state tracking, and validation support, rather than as the isolated effect of tool count or action granularity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ 3.2 Main Results · p. 12The predefined tool set scaffolds weaker models that cannot reliably express intent through bash alone, but can add overhead for stronger models capable of composing complex, multi-step shell commands; the crossover also depends on how shell-centric the task types is.
“Takeaway: The predefined tool set scaffolds weaker models that cannot reliably express intent through bash alone, but can add overhead for stronger models capable of composing complex, multi-step shell commands. The crossover also depends on how shell-centric the task types is.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ 4 Analysis · p. 13Planning helps the least capable model sustain execution through an initial edit attempt, with the additional turns contributing to higher cost.
“These results suggest that planning helps the least capable model sustain execution through an initial edit attempt, with the additional turns contributing to higher cost.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ 3.2 Main Results · p. 11The Mistral result is an accuracy-cost trade-off rather than uniform dominance, showing that the preferred action space depends on both capability and task types.
“The Mistral result is therefore an accuracy-cost trade-off rather than uniform dominance, showing that the preferred action space depends on both capability and task types.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ 4 Analysis · p. 14Bash-only enables larger code-writing actions and fewer interactions.
“Bash-only enables larger code-writing actions and fewer interactions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ 3.2 Main Results · p. 9Planning trades additional computation for accuracy on the weaker model, but primarily reduces cost on the stronger models; its value at intermediate capability remains task-type-dependent.
“Takeaway: Planning trades additional computation for accuracy on the weaker model, but primarily reduces cost on the stronger models; its value at intermediate capability remains task-type-dependent.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ 3.2 Main Results · p. 7T4's early elision handles many cases before summarization is needed, reducing costly LLM summarization calls and helping explain its lower cost.
“These results suggest that T4's early elision handles many cases before summarization is needed, reducing costly LLM summarization calls and helping explain its lower cost.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoning§ 2 Harness Design · p. 3Other supporting components (workspace access controls, post-edit diagnostics, stuck detection) remain fixed across ablations to isolate each intervention's effect.
“Other supporting components like, workspace access controls, post-edit diagnostics, and stuck detection remain fixed across ablations to isolate each intervention's effect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ 1 Introduction · p. 2Harness preferences can vary across models.
“suggesting that harness preferences can vary across models.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cao et al., 2026 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown data§ Implementation Details · p. 6Success rates were compared using two-sided exact McNemar tests on task-paired outcomes, with Benjamini-Hochberg procedure to control the false discovery rate at 0.05.
“Within each family, we compare success rates using two-sided exact McNemar tests on task-paired outcomes and apply the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure to control the false discovery rate at 0.05.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisereasoning§ 2.3 Context management · p. 5Elision reclaims tokens cheaply but discards detail, recall recovers that detail when needed, and summarization compresses history too old to keep verbatim.
“Elision reclaims tokens cheaply but discards detail, recall recovers that detail when needed, and summarization compresses history too old to keep verbatim.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ 3.2 Main Results · p. 9Planning extends Nemotron-3 30B runs that would otherwise terminate before an edit, while the removed turns for Nemotron-3 550B and Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B are largely post-edit verification.
“Section 4 traces these changes to individual trajectories: planning extends Nemotron-3 30B runs that would otherwise terminate before an edit, while the removed turns for Nemotron-3 550B and Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B are largely post-edit verification.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ 4 Analysis · p. 14The shell lets capable models bundle several low-level operations into one command or script, whereas the structured interface spreads the same work across many smaller interactions.
“This pattern suggests that the shell lets capable models bundle several low-level operations into one command or script, whereas the structured interface spreads the same work across many smaller interactions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ 3.2 Main Results · p. 8Recall use is concentrated under the greatest context pressure and almost entirely in Nemotron-3 30B; Nemotron-3 550B and Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B rarely invoke it.
“Recall use is therefore concentrated under the greatest context pressure and almost entirely in Nemotron-3 30B; Nemotron-3 550B and Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B rarely invoke it.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ 3.2 Main Results · p. 11Terminal-Bench is more shell-centric, so removing competing workspace tools better matches the model's preferred actions; on SWE-Bench, predefined read, search, and edit actions remain important.
“Terminal-Bench is therefore more shell-centric, so removing competing workspace tools better matches the model's preferred actions; on SWE-Bench, predefined read, search, and edit actions remain important.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone given§ 2 Harness Design · p. 3The harness's modular design allows components to be independently configured and composed, enabling controlled component-level analysis.
“Our modular design allows components to be independently configured and composed, enabling controlled component-level analysis.”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
“This modular design allows us to hold the model, task, execution loop, and unablated components fixed while estimating the conditional effect of each implemented intervention.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · p. 2 · plain
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitation§ 2.2 Action space · p. 3Web search was excluded because SWE-Bench tasks originate from public GitHub issues, and search could expose the corresponding pull request and ground-truth patch.
“We exclude web search because SWE-Bench tasks originate from public GitHub issues, and search could expose the corresponding pull request and ground-truth patch (Cao et al., 2026).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cao et al., 2026 source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ C.5 Trajectory-Level Statistics at 128k · p. 32Planning and the action space are the interventions that change the trajectory.
“Planning and the action space are the interventions that change the trajectory.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ 4 Analysis · p. 14Predefined tools lower the complexity of each individual action, but they often do so by increasing the number of interactions and incremental repair cycles needed to express the same operation.
“Thus, predefined tools lower the complexity of each individual action, but they often do so by increasing the number of interactions and incremental repair cycles needed to express the same operation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoning§ Limitations · p. 16Each setting is run once per task, and Terminal-Bench contains only 89 tasks, so many Terminal-Bench contrasts do not reach significance under the paired McNemar test.
“Each setting is run once per task, and Terminal-Bench contains only 89 tasks, so many Terminal-Bench contrasts do not reach significance under the paired McNemar test; our conclusions there rest on consistent directions across models and budgets rather than on individually significant cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ 5.2 Coding Harness · p. 15Behavioral differences between coding-agent frameworks change across model generations.
“AgentArch (Bogavelli et al., 2025) reports model-specific architecture preferences, while a large trajectory study finds that behavioral differences between coding-agent frameworks change across model generations (Mehtiyev and Assunção, 2026).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoning§ B.4 Planning and context recall · p. 26When enabled, the update_plan and recall_event tools remain available under either action-space condition.
“When enabled, both tools remain available under either action-space condition.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ C.1.2 SWE-BenchBehavior Encoding · p. 28The SWE-Bench behavior encoding builds on the trajectory-analysis framework of Mehtiyev and Assunção (2026).
“Building on the trajectory-analysis framework of Mehtiyev and Assunção (2026), we assign every turn to one of five phases: localization, reproduction, fixing, verification, and other auxiliary behavior.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mehtiyev and Assunção (2026) source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ 5.2 Coding Harness · p. 15Individual interventions can become less useful or even harmful for stronger models, as observed for prompt-engineering strategies in software engineering.
“Individual interventions can likewise become less useful or even harmful for stronger models, as observed for prompt-engineering strategies in software engineering (Wang et al., 2026).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wang et al., 2026 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ 5.2 Coding Harness · p. 15The preferred design depends on the model.
“Finer-grained studies further indicate that the preferred design depends on the model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoning§ Limitations · p. 16Planning and the action space are ablated only under the default T4/128k configuration due to limited computing resources.
“Planning and the action space are ablated only under the default T4/128k configuration due to limited computing resources, and a full factorial study would be required to determine whether their effects persist under other combinations of components and context budgets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoning§ A.1 System prompts · p. 19The action-space intervention (ablation) changes both the active tool registry / tool availability and the interface-specific system instructions through which the tools are presented to the model, so the ablation is not isolated to tool availability alone.
“The action-space intervention changes both the active tool registry and the interface-specific system instructions.”
- Also stated in: § A.1 System prompts · p. 19 · plain
“Consequently, the action-space ablation changes both tool availability and the instructions through which those tools are presented to the model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § A.1 System prompts · p. 19 · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone given§ C.1.1 SWE-BenchFailure-Stage Attribution · p. 27Using the earliest-failure convention for assigning failure stages to unresolved SWE-Bench trajectories ensures that downstream symptoms, such as failed tests, do not obscure earlier localization or implementation errors.
“Using the earliest-failure convention ensures that downstream symptoms, such as failed tests, do not obscure earlier localization or implementation errors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone given§ A.4 Stuck-detection prompts · p. 21Permission denials do not count as failures for the purpose of stuck detection.
“Permission denials do not count as failures for this purpose.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone given§ C.2 Judge Setup and Human Validation · p. 29For each split and unit type, annotators independently assign labels using the same inventories provided to the LLM judge.
“For each split and unit type, annotators independently assign labels using the same inventories provided to the LLM judge.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone given§ Limitations · p. 16Planning is instantiated through one prompt and update mechanism, and context management follows one threshold-based policy with fixed compaction settings.
“Planning is instantiated through one prompt and update mechanism, and context management follows one threshold-based policy with fixed compaction settings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ 5.3 Context Management · p. 15The value of managing context cannot be separated from how much window there is to manage against, nor from whether the model is strong enough to be helped rather than starved by compaction.
“The value of managing context cannot be separated from how much window there is to manage against, nor from whether the model is strong enough to be helped rather than starved by compaction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown data§ C.2 Judge Setup and Human Validation · p. 29The validation sample consisted of 200 trajectories divided evenly into three non-overlapping splits, one per annotator, with one annotator labeling one more trajectory than the other two.
“A sample of 200 trajectories is divided evenly into three non-overlapping splits, one per annotator, with one annotator labeling one more trajectory than the other two; each annotator labels every unit in their split.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoning§ A.4 Stuck-detection prompts · p. 21Stuck detection is enabled identically in every experimental condition and therefore belongs to the fixed execution substrate.
“Stuck detection is enabled identically in every experimental condition and therefore belongs to the fixed execution substrate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The 200-trajectory sample used for human validation is representative of the full set of experimental trajectories.
“A sample of 200 trajectories is divided evenly into three non-overlapping splits, one per annotator, with one annotator labeling one more trajectory than the other two; each annotator labels every unit in their split.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Read-only tool is said both to leave harness state unchanged and to update it
MinorThe table's definition of read-only tools says they do not modify harness state, but the read-only read_file tool records a read in session file state.
“Read-only tools do not modify the workspace or harness state and may execute concurrently within a model turn.”
“Side effects: records the read in the session's file state.”
The stated three-way split cannot contain 200 trajectories
MinorIf two annotators receive the same number of trajectories and the third receives one more, the three split sizes must total one more than a multiple of three. They cannot total 200.
“A sample of 200 trajectories is divided evenly into three non-overlapping splits, one per annotator”
“with one annotator labeling one more trajectory than the other two; each annotator labels every unit in their split.”
Cites
Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior
Park, J. S., O'Brien, J., Cai, C. J., Morris, M. R., Liang, P., & Bernstein, M. S. (2023) · Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology · doi:10.1145/3586183.3606763 · Cited by 2,187 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…methods apply fixed, hand-designed strategies, such as eliding or truncating stale content (Xiao et al., 2024; Jiang et al., 2023), retrieving earlier content on demand from an external store (Packer et al., 2023; Park et al., 2023), and summarizing history into a compact state (Wu et al., 2021).”
ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models
Yao, S., Zhao, J., Yu, D., Du, N., Shafran, I., Narasimhan, K., & Cao, Y. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.03629 · Cited by 608 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The harness follows a ReAct loop (Yao et al., 2022), with each turn comprising a reasoning step, an action, and an observation (Figure 2).”
SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineering
Yang, J., Jimenez, C., Wettig, A., Lieret, K., Yao, S., Narasimhan, K., & Press, O. (2024) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 37 · doi:10.52202/079017-1601 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
AutoCodeRover: Autonomous Program Improvement
Zhang, Y., Ruan, H., Fan, Z., & Roychoudhury, A. (2024) · Proceedings of the 33rd ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis · doi:10.1145/3650212.3680384 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
LLMLingua: Compressing Prompts for Accelerated Inference of Large Language Models
Jiang, H., Wu, Q., Lin, C.-Y., Yang, Y., & Qiu, L. (2023) · arXiv · Cited by 168 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Lossy methods such as elision and summarization reduce context but may remove information that becomes useful later (Xiao et al., 2024; Jiang et al., 2023; Wu et al., 2021), whereas lossless methods preserve recoverability through external storage and retrieval but require additional machinery and…”
LLMLingua: Compressing Prompts for Accelerated Inference of Large Language Models
Jiang, H., Wu, Q., Lin, C.-Y., Yang, Y., & Qiu, L. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.825 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
CodePlan: Repository-Level Coding using LLMs and Planning
Bairi, R., Sonwane, A., Kanade, A., C., V. D., Iyer, A., Parthasarathy, S., Rajamani, S., Ashok, B., & Shet, S. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/3643757 · Cited by 92 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…components because prior systems identify them as complementary requirements of long-horizon coding agents, with planning maintaining task progress (Bairi et al., 2024), the action space translating model intentions into executable workspace operations (Yang et al., 2024; Wang et al., 2024), and…”
Recursively Summarizing Books with Human Feedback
Wu, J., Ouyang, L., Ziegler, D. M., Stiennon, N., Lowe, R., Leike, J., & Christiano, P. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.10862 · Cited by 76 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…such as elision and summarization reduce context but may remove information that becomes useful later (Xiao et al., 2024; Jiang et al., 2023; Wu et al., 2021), whereas lossless methods preserve recoverability through external storage and retrieval but require additional machinery and rely…”
SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?
Jimenez, C. E., Yang, J., Wettig, A., Yao, S., Pei, K., Press, O., & Narasimhan, K. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.06770 · Cited by 72 · cited 8× · see citing works
“Research on their design has shown that the harness, not the model alone, governs performance (Yang et al., 2024).”
InfluentialMemGPT: Towards LLMs as Operating Systems
Packer, C., Wooders, S., Lin, K., Fang, V., Patil, S. G., Stoica, I., & Gonzalez, J. E. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.08560 · Cited by 64 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…with planning maintaining task progress (Bairi et al., 2024), the action space translating model intentions into executable workspace operations (Yang et al., 2024; Wang et al., 2024), and context management preserving useful information as trajectories grow (Packer et al., 2023; Wu et al., 2025).”
Memory as Action: Autonomous Context Curation for Long-Horizon Agentic Tasks
Zhang, Y., Shu, J., Ma, Y., et al. (2025) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.12635 · Cited by 61
Efficient Streaming Language Models with Attention Sinks
Xiao, G., Tian, Y., Chen, B., Han, S., & Lewis, M. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.17453 · Cited by 55 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Lossy methods such as elision and summarization reduce context but may remove information that becomes useful later (Xiao et al., 2024; Jiang et al., 2023; Wu et al., 2021), whereas lossless methods preserve recoverability through external storage and retrieval but require additional machinery and…”
SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineering
Yang, J., Jimenez, C. E., Wettig, A., Lieret, K., Yao, S., Narasimhan, K., & Press, O. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.15793 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Do Advanced Language Models Eliminate the Need for Prompt Engineering in Software Engineering?
Wang, G., Sun, Z., Ye, S., Gong, Z., Chen, Y., Zhao, Y., Liang, Q., & Hao, D. (2026) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3771933 · Cited by 26 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Individual interventions can likewise become less useful or even harmful for stronger models, as observed for prompt-engineering strategies in software engineering (Wang et al., 2026).”
OpenHands: An Open Platform for AI Software Developers as Generalist Agents
Wang, X., Li, B., Song, Y., Xu, F. F., Tang, X., Zhuge, M., Pan, J., Song, Y., Li, B., Singh, J., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.16741 · Cited by 24 · cited 4× · see citing works
“5 performs best with OpenHands among the evaluated harnesses, whereas Claude-Sonnet-4.”
InfluentialSelf-citationAgentless: Demystifying LLM-based Software Engineering Agents
Xia, C. S., Deng, Y., Dunn, S., & Zhang, L. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.01489 · Cited by 24 · cited 2× · see citing works
“At the system level, constrained localize, repair, and validate pipelines such as Agentless (Xia et al., 2024) and AutoCodeRover (Zhang et al., 2024) show that strong performance can be achieved without highly elaborate agent architectures.”
Executable Code Actions Elicit Better LLM Agents
Wang, X., Chen, Y., Yuan, L., Zhang, Y., Li, Y., Peng, H., & Ji, H. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.01030 · Cited by 23 · cited 3× · see citing works
“These choices are not incidental implementation details: changing the harness while holding the model fixed can substantially change model performance (Yang et al., 2024; Wang et al., 2024; Lewis, 2026).”
Self-citationSculptor: Empowering LLMs with Cognitive Agency via Active Context Management
Li, M., Xu, L.-H., Tan, Q.-T., et al. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.04664 · Cited by 20 · cited 2×
“Second, dynamic methods train the model, often via reinforcement learning, to manage its own context (Wu et al., 2025; Kang et al., 2025; Li et al., 2026; Zhang et al., 2026).”
CodeR: Issue Resolving with Multi-Agent and Task Graphs
Chen, D., Lin, S., Zeng, M., Zan, D., Wang, J.-G., Cheshkov, A., Sun, J., Yu, H., Dong, G., Aliev, A., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.01304 · Cited by 8 · cited 1×
“Later systems add long-term memory for the harness (Wong et al., 2025) or add task graphs and modular sub-agents (Chen et al., 2024; Arora et al., 2024), and recent surveys catalogue the design space (Rombaut, 2026).”
GLM-5: from Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineering
GLM-5-Team, :, Zeng, A., Lv, X., Hou, Z., Du, Z., Zheng, Q., Chen, B., Yin, D., Ge, C., et al. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.15763 · Cited by 6 · cited 1× · see citing works
“6 (Team et al., 2026; Kimi Team, 2026), GLM-5 (Zeng et al., 2026), and Mistral Medium 3.5 (Mistral AI, 2026), are designed or evaluated for code generation and agentic use.”
InfluentialSelf-citationLCM: Lossless Context Management
Ehrlich, C., & Blackman, T. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.04050 · Cited by 4 · cited 1×
“…et al., 2023; Wu et al., 2021), whereas lossless methods preserve recoverability through external storage and retrieval but require additional machinery and rely on the model to retrieve the right information (Packer et al., 2023; Park et al., 2023; Ehrlich and Blackman, 2026; Xu et al., 2026).”
Kimi K2.5: Visual Agentic Intelligence
Kimi Team, Bai, T., Bai, Y., Bao, Y., Cai, S. H., Cao, Y., Chai, Z., Charles, Y., Che, H. S., Chen, C., et al. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.02276 · Cited by 2 · cited 1× · see citing works
“6 (Team et al., 2026; Kimi Team, 2026), GLM-5 (Zeng et al., 2026), and Mistral Medium 3.5 (Mistral AI, 2026), are designed or evaluated for code generation and agentic use.”
InfluentialSelf-citationQwen3-Coder-Next Technical Report
Cao, R., Chen, M., Chen, J., Cui, Z., Feng, Y., Hui, B., Jing, Y., Li, K., Li, M., Lin, J., et al. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.00729 · Cited by 2 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Recent frontier models, including Qwen3-Coder (Cao et al., 2026), Kimi K2.”
InfluentialSelf-citationMASAI: Modular Architecture for Software-engineering AI Agents
Arora, D., Sonwane, A., Wadhwa, N., Mehrotra, A., Utpala, S., Bairi, R., Kanade, A., & Natarajan, N. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.11638 · Cited by 2 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Later systems add long-term memory for the harness (Wong et al., 2025) or add task graphs and modular sub-agents (Chen et al., 2024; Arora et al., 2024), and recent surveys catalogue the design space (Rombaut, 2026).”
Memory as Action: Autonomous Context Curation for Long-Horizon Agentic Tasks
Zhang, Y., Shu, J., Ma, Y., Lin, X., Wu, S., & Sang, J. (2026) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.findings-acl.956 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
ACON: Optimizing Context Compression for Long-horizon LLM Agents
Kang, M., Chen, W.-N., Han, D., Inan, H. A., Wutschitz, L., Chen, Y., Sim, R., & Rajmohan, S. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.00615 · Cited by 1 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Second, dynamic methods train the model, often via reinforcement learning, to manage its own context (Wu et al., 2025; Kang et al., 2025; Li et al., 2026; Zhang et al., 2026).”
NVIDIA Nemotron 3: Efficient and Open IntelligencePreprint
NVIDIA, :, Blakeman, A., Grattafiori, A., Basant, A., Gupta, A., Khattar, A., Renduchintala, A., Vavre, A., Shukla, A., et al. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.20856 · Cited by 1 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Using this harness, we evaluate three sizes of Nemotron-3 (Blakeman et al., 2025), including 30B, 120B, and 550B, as a within-family capability axis, with Mistral-Medium-3.”
Beyond Resolution Rates: Behavioral Drivers of Coding Agent Success and Failure
Mehtiyev, T., & Assunção, W. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.02547 · Cited by 1 · cited 2×
“Prior work has examined component interactions and architectural choices across models (Liu, 2026; Bogavelli et al., 2025; Mehtiyev and Assunção, 2026; Rombaut, 2026), but has not jointly characterized implementation-level planning, workspace action interfaces, and context-management policies on…”
Terminal-Bench: Benchmarking Agents on Hard, Realistic Tasks in Command Line Interfaces
Merrill, M. A., Shaw, A. G., Carlini, N., Li, B., Raj, H., Bercovich, I., Shi, L., Shin, J. Y., Walshe, T., Buchanan, E. K., et al. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.11868 · cited 4×
“We evaluate every model on two complementary long-horizon coding benchmarks: SWE-Bench Verified (Jimenez et al., 2024), which tests repository-level issue resolution, and Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Merrill et al., 2026), which tests end-to-end terminal task completion.”
InfluentialReSum: Unlocking Long-Horizon Search Intelligence via Context SummarizationPreprint
Wu, X., Li, K., Zhao, Y., Zhang, L., Ou, L., Yin, H., Zhang, Z., Yu, X., Zhang, D., Jiang, Y., et al. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.13313 · cited 2×
“…with planning maintaining task progress (Bairi et al., 2024), the action space translating model intentions into executable workspace operations (Yang et al., 2024; Wang et al., 2024), and context management preserving useful information as trajectories grow (Packer et al., 2023; Wu et al., 2025).”
Self-citationInside the Scaffold: A Source-Code Taxonomy of Coding Agent Architectures
Rombaut, B. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.03515 · cited 3×
“Later systems add long-term memory for the harness (Wong et al., 2025) or add task graphs and modular sub-agents (Chen et al., 2024; Arora et al., 2024), and recent surveys catalogue the design space (Rombaut, 2026).”
Confucius Code Agent: Scalable Agent Scaffolding for Real-World Codebases
Wong, S., Qi, Z., Wang, Z., Hu, N., Lin, S., Ge, J., Gao, E., Chen, W., Du, Y., Yu, M., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.10398 · cited 2×
“Later systems add long-term memory for the harness (Wong et al., 2025) or add task graphs and modular sub-agents (Chen et al., 2024; Arora et al., 2024), and recent surveys catalogue the design space (Rombaut, 2026).”
AgentArch: A Comprehensive Benchmark to Evaluate Agent Architectures in Enterprise
Bogavelli, T., Sharma, R., & Subramani, H. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.10769 · cited 2×
“Prior work has examined component interactions and architectural choices across models (Liu, 2026; Bogavelli et al., 2025; Mehtiyev and Assunção, 2026; Rombaut, 2026), but has not jointly characterized implementation-level planning, workspace action interfaces, and context-management policies on…”
Same Model, Different Harness: Different Coding-Agent Results
Lewis, S. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.26218 · cited 1×
“These choices are not incidental implementation details: changing the harness while holding the model fixed can substantially change model performance (Yang et al., 2024; Wang et al., 2024; Lewis, 2026).”
LLM Agents Are Latent Context Managers: Eliciting Self-Managed Context via State ProprioceptionPreprint
Xu, B., Li, H., & Zhang, K. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.30005 · cited 1×
“Second, dynamic methods train the model, often via reinforcement learning, to manage its own context (Wu et al., 2025; Kang et al., 2025; Li et al., 2026; Zhang et al., 2026).”
More Is Not Always Better: Cross-Component Interference in LLM Agent ScaffoldingPreprint
Liu, M. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.05716
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
ServeLearnBench: How Well Can Agents Self-Improve from Serving Experience?Preprint
Zheng, H., Di, Y., Sadhukhan, R., Jin, S., & Chen, B. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.07792
“AlphaEvolve and EvoX instead evolve code and search strategies, while controlled harness-design experiments isolate the effects of planning, actions, and context management across models [8, 24, 27].”
HarnessSecurity-Bench: Do Security Mechanisms Really Protect Coding Agent Harnesses?
Zhu, Z., Huang, L., Ji, R., Ye, M., Zhou, Z., Guo, H., Wu, J., Ye, Y., Feng, Y., Dai, H.-N., et al. (2026) · arXiv
“Harness design affects task success and resource costs even when the underlying model is held fixed [18, 52].”
MedicalHarness: A Controlled Evaluation of LLMs and Agent Harnesses on Medical TasksPreprint
Wang, Z., Zhao, L., & Ding, K. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.05778
What Does a Harness Buy? Tokens, MostlyPreprint
Liu, Y., & Han, Z. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.04433
“Leaderboards, meanwhile, mix harnesses freely, so a ranking of models is also a ranking of whatever harness each submitter chose (Zhang et al., 2026).”
Identical Runs, Different Results: Benchmarking AI Coding Agents on Open-Weight Models
de la Rubia, E. A., & Pafka, S. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.33812
“A broader question is how context management interacts with caching: strategies that rewrite or summarise earlier context, which Fan et al. (2026) find the most efficient when tokens are priced at list rates, also change the prompt prefix a cache depends on, and could rank differently once cached…”
Influential
- Authors
- Fan, R.-Z., Zhang, Z., Ma, S., Hu, Y., Wang, S., Song, K., Liu, F., Zamani, H., & Wang, X.
- Affiliations
- University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
- Emory University (US)
- University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2026
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2609.20804
- OpenAlex
- W7213605503
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 37
- Type
- posted content
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
- Keywords
- autonomous coding agents, large language models, context management, context window, planning, action space, tool use, code summarization, SWE-bench, cost efficiency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review