MASPOB: Bandit-Based Prompt Optimization for Multi-Agent Systems with Graph Neural Networks
Open accessAbstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved great success in many real-world applications, especially the one serving as the cognitive backbone of Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) to orchestrate complex workflows in practice. Since many deployment scenarios preclude MAS workflow modifications and its performance is highly sensitive to the input prompts, prompt optimization emerges as a more natural approach to improve its performance. However, real-world prompt optimization for MAS is impeded by three key challenges: (1) the need of sample efficiency due to prohibitive evaluation costs, (2) topology-induced coupling among prompts, and (3) the combinatorial explosion of the search space. To address these challenges, we introduce MASPOB (Multi-Agent System Prompt Optimization via Bandits), a novel sample-efficient framework based on bandits. By leveraging Upper Confidence Bound (UCB) to quantify uncertainty, the bandit framework balances exploration and exploitation, maximizing gains within a strictly limited budget. To handle topology-induced coupling, MASPOB integrates Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) to capture structural priors, learning topology-aware representations of prompt semantics. Furthermore, it employs coordinate ascent to decompose the optimization into univariate sub-problems, reducing search complexity from exponential to linear. Extensive experiments across diverse benchmarks demonstrate that MASPOB achieves state-of-the-art performance, consistently outperforming existing baselines.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
MASPOB selects prompt combinations using bandit-guided coordinate ascent but does not update its candidate pools.
“MASPOB selects prompt combinations using bandit-guided coordinate ascent but does not update its candidate pools (Hong et al., 2026).”
From MESH-Harness: Self-Improving Agent Harnesses via Bandit-Guided Compositional Evolution (2026) · cites this paper as Hong et al., 2026
Cites
A contextual-bandit approach to personalized news article recommendation
Li, L., Chu, W., Langford, J., & Schapire, R. E. (2010) · Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web · doi:10.1145/1772690.1772758 · Cited by 2,562 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Specifically, it estimate epistemic uncertainty via an information matrix (Abbasi-Yadkori et al., 2011; Li et al., 2010; Chu et al., 2011) in the learned representation space, and combine this uncertainty with the surrogate’s predicted performance to construct an acquisition score.”
Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models
Wang, X., Wei, J., Schuurmans, D., Le, Q., Chi, E., Narang, S., Chowdhery, A., & Zhou, D. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.11171 · Cited by 829 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Prior work has shown that prompting strategies such as Chain-of-Thought (CoT) (Wei et al., 2022), Tree-of-Thoughts (ToT) (Yao et al., 2023a), Re-Act (Yao et al., 2023b), and Self-Consistency (Wang et al., 2023b) can substantially improve the reasoning capability of large language models (LLMs).”
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
MESH-Harness: Self-Improving Agent Harnesses via Bandit-Guided Compositional Evolution
Shang, Z., Huo, Y., Gong, M., Yan, A., Qu, Z., Dong, J., Low, B. K. H., Wu, C., & Dai, Z. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.05300
Self-citation
- Authors
- Hong, Z., Zhang, Q., Sun, J., Shang, Z., Kong, M., Wang, X., Shu, Y., & Dai, Z.
- Affiliations
- Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen (CN)
- Ritsumeikan University (JP)
- The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou) (CN)
- ORCID
- Dai, Zhongxiang
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2026
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2603.02630
- OpenAlex
- W7133531098
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
- Keywords
- multi-agent systems, prompt optimization, bandit algorithms, upper confidence bound, graph neural networks, large language models, sample efficiency, exploration-exploitation balance, coordinate ascent, combinatorial search space
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review