PreprintCited by 1Advanced Bandit Algorithms ResearchTopic ModelingMulti-Agent Systems and Negotiation

MASPOB: Bandit-Based Prompt Optimization for Multi-Agent Systems with Graph Neural Networks

Open access
Hong, Zhi, Zhang, Qian, Sun, Jiahang, Shang, Zhiwei, Kong, Mingze, Wang, Xiangyi, Shu, Yao, Dai, Zhongxiang·2026·arXiv

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved great success in many real-world applications, especially the one serving as the cognitive backbone of Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) to orchestrate complex workflows in practice. Since many deployment scenarios preclude MAS workflow modifications and its performance is highly sensitive to the input prompts, prompt optimization emerges as a more natural approach to improve its performance. However, real-world prompt optimization for MAS is impeded by three key challenges: (1) the need of sample efficiency due to prohibitive evaluation costs, (2) topology-induced coupling among prompts, and (3) the combinatorial explosion of the search space. To address these challenges, we introduce MASPOB (Multi-Agent System Prompt Optimization via Bandits), a novel sample-efficient framework based on bandits. By leveraging Upper Confidence Bound (UCB) to quantify uncertainty, the bandit framework balances exploration and exploitation, maximizing gains within a strictly limited budget. To handle topology-induced coupling, MASPOB integrates Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) to capture structural priors, learning topology-aware representations of prompt semantics. Furthermore, it employs coordinate ascent to decompose the optimization into univariate sub-problems, reducing search complexity from exponential to linear. Extensive experiments across diverse benchmarks demonstrate that MASPOB achieves state-of-the-art performance, consistently outperforming existing baselines.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2603.02630

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MASPOB selects prompt combinations using bandit-guided coordinate ascent but does not update its candidate pools.

    “MASPOB selects prompt combinations using bandit-guided coordinate ascent but does not update its candidate pools (Hong et al., 2026).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hong, Z., Zhang, Q., Sun, J., Shang, Z., Kong, M., Wang, X., Shu, Y., & Dai, Z.
Affiliations
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen (CN)
  • Ritsumeikan University (JP)
  • The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou) (CN)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2026
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7133531098
Cited by
0
References
2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
Keywords
multi-agent systems, prompt optimization, bandit algorithms, upper confidence bound, graph neural networks, large language models, sample efficiency, exploration-exploitation balance, coordinate ascent, combinatorial search space

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review