GroupGuard: A Framework for Modeling and Defending Collusive Attacks in Multi-Agent Systems
Open accessAbstract
While large language model-based agents demonstrate great potential in collaborative tasks, their interactivity also introduces security vulnerabilities. In this paper, we propose and model group collusive attacks, a highly destructive threat in which multiple agents coordinate via sociological strategies to mislead the system. To address this challenge, we introduce GroupGuard, a training-free defense framework that employs a multi-layered defense strategy, including continuous graph-based monitoring, active honeypot inducement, and structural pruning, to identify and isolate collusive agents. Experimental results across five datasets and four topologies demonstrate that group collusive attacks increase the attack success rate by up to 15\% compared to individual attacks. GroupGuard consistently achieves high detection accuracy (up to 88\%) and effectively restores collaborative performance, providing a robust solution for securing multi-agent systems.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
GroupGuard addresses collusive attacks in multi-agent systems, a threat vector (A6) that SentinelAgent identifies but defers to future work.
“GroupGuard [30] addresses collusive attacks in multi-agent systems, a threat vector (A6) that SentinelAgent identifies but defers to future work.”
From SentinelAgent: Intent-Verified Delegation Chains for Securing Federal Multi-Agent AI Systems (2026) · cites this paper as [30]
Cites
Solving General Arithmetic Word Problems
Roy, S., & Roth, D. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1608.01413 · Cited by 275
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
- Authors
- Tao, Y., Zheng, X., Yang, S., Tao, M., & Wang, X.
- Affiliations
- Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School (CN)
- University of Hong Kong (HK)
- University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2026
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2603.13940
- OpenAlex
- W7137828285
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
- Keywords
- multi-agent systems, LLM agents, training-free defense, structural pruning, agent security
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
