PreprintCited by 3Adversarial Robustness in Machine LearningTopic ModelingDigital Media Forensic Detection

RAGShield: Detecting Numerical Claim Manipulation in Government RAG Systems

Open access
Patil, KrishnaSaiReddy·2026·arXiv

Abstract

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems are deployed across federal agencies for citizen-facing tax guidance, benefits eligibility, and legal information, where a single incorrect number causes direct financial harm. This paper proves that all embedding-based RAG defenses share a fundamental blind spot: changing a tax deduction by $50,000 produces cosine similarity 0.9998, invisible to every known detection threshold. Across 174 manipulation pairs and two embedding models, the mean sensitivity gap is 1,459x. The blind spot is confirmed on real IRS documents.The root cause is that embeddings encode topic, not numerical precision. RAGShield sidesteps this by operating on extracted values directly: a pattern-based engine identifies dollar amounts and percentages in government text, links each value to its governing entity through two-pass context propagation (99.8% entity detection on 2,742 real IRS passages), and verifies every claim against a cross-source registry built from the corpus itself. A temporal tracker flags value changes that fall outside known government update schedules. On 430 attacks generated from real IRS document content, RAGShield detects every one (0.0% ASR, 95% CI [0%, 1%]) while embedding-based defenses miss 79-90% of the same attacks.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2604.00387

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This work addresses the delegation chain layer of the government AI security stack, complementing CivicShield for conversational interfaces and RAGShield for knowledge pipelines.

    “This work addresses the delegation chain layer of the government AI security stack, complementing CivicShield for conversational interfaces and RAGShield for knowledge pipelines.”

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Patil, K.
Corresponding author
Patil, KrishnaSaiReddy
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2026
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7148525494
Cited by
0
References
0
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
Keywords
retrieval-augmented generation, tax guidance, value extraction, entity detection, temporal tracking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review