The DOI matches its DataCite record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What Makes a Sale? Simulating End-to-End Seller--Buyer Retail Dynamics with LLM Agents
Abstract
Evaluating retail strategies before deployment is difficult, as outcomes are determined across multiple stages, from seller-side persuasion through buyer-seller interaction to purchase decisions. However, existing retail simulators capture only partial aspects of this process and do not model cross-stage dependencies, making it difficult to assess how early decisions affect downstream outcomes. We present RetailSim, an end-to-end retail simulation framework that models this pipeline in a unified environment, explicitly designed for simulation fidelity through diverse product spaces, persona-driven agents, and multi-turn interactions. We evaluate RetailSim with a dual protocol comprising human evaluation of behavioral fidelity and meta-evaluation against real-world economic regularities, showing that it successfully reproduces key patterns such as demographic purchasing behavior, the price-demand relationship, and heterogeneous price elasticity. We further demonstrate its practical utility via decision-oriented use cases, including persona inference, seller-buyer interaction analysis, and sales strategy evaluation, showing RetailSim's potential as a controlled testbed for exploring retail strategies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Prior work shows that retail and negotiation interactions are multistage and economically consequential: local choices about persuasion, clarification, or offer framing can compound into downstream outcomes such as purchases and commitments (Choi et al., 2026;Wang et al., 2025b).”
From Organizational Control Layer: Governance Infrastructure at the Execution Boundary of LLM Agent Systems (2026) · cites this paper as Choi et al., 2026
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bridging Language and Items for Retrieval and Recommendation: Benchmarking LLMs as Semantic Encoders
Hou, Y., Li, J., Fu, X., He, Z., Yan, A., Chen, X., & McAuley, J. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.03952 · Cited by 59
Zhu, S., Sun, J., Nian, Y., South, T., Pentland, A., & Pei, J. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.00073 · Cited by 4
Magentic Marketplace: An Open-Source Environment for Studying Agentic Markets
Bansal, G., Hua, W., Huang, Z., Fourney, A., Swearngin, A., Epperson, W., Payne, T., Hofman, J. M., Lucier, B., Singh, C., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.25779 · cited 2×
“…level, with limited consideration of how seller–buyer interactions connect across the full process or whether their aggregate outcomes reflect real-world economic regularities (Yao et al., 2025; Wang et al., 2025b; Zhu et al., 2025; Wang et al., 2025c; Bansal et al., 2025; Zhou et al., 2026).”
Cited by
Shi, T., Mo, Y., Liu, Y., Hao, Z., Wang, Y., Hu, W., Yu, N., Zhou, M., & Yu, J. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.04306 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Choi, J., Hwang, J., Sun, G., Ban, M., Yun, T., Cheon, H., & Song, H.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2026
- arXiv
- 2604.04468
- References
- 3
- Type
- Preprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What Makes a Sale? Simulating End-to-End Seller--Buyer Retail Dynamics with LLM Agents. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.2604.04468
- The paper
- Choi, J., Hwang, J., Sun, G., Ban, M., Yun, T., Cheon, H., & Song, H. (2026). What Makes a Sale? Simulating End-to-End Seller--Buyer Retail Dynamics with LLM Agents. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2604.04468
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
