CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 2Artificial Intelligence ApplicationsTopic ModelingMachine Learning in Materials Science

Structured Scaling of AI Discovery Across Diverse Scientific Domains

Open access
Ye, Haotian, Lin, Haowei, Tang, Jingyi, Luo, Yizhen, Thapa, Rahul, Yang, Caiyin, Su, Chang, Yang, Rui +25 more·2026·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2604.19341arXiv 2604.19341
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Scientific discovery often requires many cycles of proposing, testing, and refining candidate solutions. Language models can increasingly participate in these loops, but simply generating more attempts does not ensure progress: parallel searches may duplicate one another and iterative refinement may become trapped in poor directions. The central challenge is therefore not only to scale AI-driven discovery, but to structure that scaling so that evaluation signals compound over time. Here we introduce SimpleTES (Simple Test-time Evaluation-driven Scaling), a framework that focuses on the structured scaling of AI discovery loops, organizing evaluator queries across independent trajectories, iterative refinement, local candidate selection, and the selective reuse of evaluated histories. Drawing on structural features of scientific communities, SimpleTES uses a single open-source GPT-OSS model to establish new state-of-the-art solutions across 28 open-ended problems in diverse scientific domains ranging from quantum physics and astronomy to biology, AI, and mathematics. These include a 24.5% reduction in quantum circuit compilation overhead, up to 23% lower propulsive cost for deep-space trajectories, a 2.17x faster lasso-path solver, an 8.5% lower-error whole-brain neural-activity predictor, the fastest reported TriMul kernel, and new mathematical constructions beyond prior human or AI records. We further post-train the model for long-horizon discovery by assigning each attempt the final outcome of the trajectory it helped produce. This improves performance on both training and held-out mathematics problems, further advancing the frontier. Together, these results establish structured scaling as a general mechanism for advancing AI scientific discovery.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2604.19341

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MLEvolve achieves the best result on 11 of 15 tasks from AlphaEvolve when compared with specialized algorithmic discovery methods.

    “MLEvolve achieves the best result on 11 of 15 tasks when compared with specialized algorithmic discovery methods”

    From MLEvolve: A Self-Evolving Framework for Automated Machine Learning Algorithm Discovery (2026) · cites this paper as [36]

    The SIMPLETES Settings and Results passages compare SIMPLETES with AlphaEvolve and other methods, but do not report a result for MLEvolve. Searches for “MLEvolve” and “11 of 15” found no passage supporting the claimed task count or comparison. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 158

  1. Josh Abramson, Jonas Adler, Jack Dunger, Richard Evans, Tim Green, Alexander Pritzel, Olaf Ron- neberger, Lindsay Willmore, Andrew J Ballard, Joshua Bambrick, et al. Accurate structure predic- tion of biomolecular interactions with alphafold 3. Nature, 630(8016):493-500, 2024.
  2. Lakshya A. Agrawal, Shangyin Tan, Dilara Soylu, Noah Ziems, Rishi Khare, Krista Opsahl-Ong, Arnav Singhvi, Herumb Shandilya, Michael J. Ryan, Meng Jiang, Christopher Potts, Koushik Sen, Alexandros G. Dimakis, Ion Stoica, Dan Klein, Matei Zaharia, and Omar Khattab. Gepa: Reflective prompt evolution can outperform reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.19457, 2025. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.19457. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.19457. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Nasir Ahmed, T. Natarajan, and K. R. Rao. Discrete cosine transform. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 23(1):90-93, 1974.
  4. Dario Amodei, Chris Olah, Jacob Steinhardt, Paul Christiano, John Schulman, and Dan Mané. Con- crete problems in ai safety, 2016. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.06565. · arXiv
  5. Henrique Assumpção, Diego Ferreira, Leandro Campos, and Fabricio Murai. Codeevolve: an open source evolutionary coding agent for algorithmic discovery and optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.14150, 2025. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2510.14150. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.14150. · DOI · Paper page
  6. Jinheon Baek, Sujay Kumar Jauhar, Silviu Cucerzan, and Sung Ju Hwang. ResearchAgent: Iterative research idea generation over scientific literature with large language models. pages 6709-6738. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2025. ISBN 979-8-89176-189-6. doi: 10.18653/v1/2025. naacl-long.342. URL https://aclanthology.org/2025.naacl-long.342/. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Richard C. Barnard and Stefan Steinerberger. Three convolution inequalities on the real line with connections to additive combinatorics. Journal of Number Theory, 207:42-55, 2020. ISSN 0022-314X. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnt.2019.07.001. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S0022314X19302549. · DOI
  8. Joshua Batson, Loïc Royer, and James Webber. Molecular cross-validation for single-cell rna-seq. BioRxiv, page 786269, 2019.
  9. Maciej Besta, Nils Blach, Ales Kubicek, Robert Gerstenberger, Michal Podstawski, Lukas Gianinazzi, Joanna Gajda, Tomasz Lehmann, Hubert Niewiadomski, Piotr Nyczyk, et al. Graph of thoughts: Solving elaborate problems with large language models. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, volume 38, pages 17682-17690, 2024.
  10. Emmett Bicker. Aster: Autonomous scientific discovery over 20x faster than existing methods. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.07040, 2026. · arXiv
  11. Dolev Bluvstein, Harry Levine, Giulia Semeghini, Tout T Wang, Sepehr Ebadi, Marcin Kalinowski, Alexander Keesling, Nishad Maskara, Hannes Pichler, Markus Greiner, et al. A quantum processor based on coherent transport of entangled atom arrays. Nature, 604(7906):451-456, 2022.
  12. Dolev Bluvstein, Simon J Evered, Alexandra A Geim, Sophie H Li, Hengyun Zhou, Tom Manovitz, Sepehr Ebadi, Madelyn Cain, Marcin Kalinowski, Dominik Hangleiter, et al. Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays. Nature, 626(7997):58-65, 2024.
  13. Christopher Boyer and Zane Kun Li. An improved example for an autoconvolution inequality. Ex- perimental Mathematics, 2026. doi: 10.1080/10586458.2025.2607423. Published online 2026-02-15. · DOI
  14. Richard P. Brent, William Orrick, Judy anne Osborn, and Paul Zimmermann. Maximal determi- nants and saturated D-optimal designs of orders 19 and 37, 2011. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/ 1112.4160.
  15. Bradley Brown, Jordan Juravsky, Ryan Ehrlich, Ronald Clark, Quoc V Le, Christopher Ré, and Azalia Mirhoseini. Large language monkeys: Scaling inference compute with repeated sampling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.21787, 2024. · arXiv
  16. Richard H. Byrd, Peihuang Lu, Jorge Nocedal, and Ciyou Zhu. A limited memory algorithm for bound constrained optimization. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 16(5):1190-1208, 1995.
  17. Shiyi Cao, Ziming Mao, Joseph E Gonzalez, and Ion Stoica. K-search: Llm kernel generation via co-evolving intrinsic world model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.19128, 2026. · arXiv
  18. Gavin C. Cawley and Nicola L. C. Talbot. On over-fitting in model selection and subsequent selec- tion bias in performance evaluation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 11(70):2079-2107, 2010. URL https://www.jmlr.org/papers/v11/cawley10a.html.
  19. Mert Cemri, Shubham Agrawal, Akshat Gupta, Shu Liu, Audrey Cheng, Qiuyang Mang, Ashwin Naren, Lutfi Eren Erdogan, Koushik Sen, Matei Zaharia, Alex Dimakis, and Ion Stoica. Adaevolve: Adaptive llm driven zeroth-order optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.20133, 2026. doi: 10.48550/ arXiv.2602.20133. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.20133. · DOI · Paper page
  20. Souradip Chakraborty, Mohammadreza Pourreza, Ruoxi Sun, Yiwen Song, Nino Scherrer, Furong Huang, Amrit Singh Bedi, Ahmad Beirami, Jindong Gu, Hamid Palangi, and Tomas Pfister. On the role of feedback in test-time scaling of agentic ai workflows, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2504.01931.
  21. Jun Shern Chan, Neil Chowdhury, Oliver Jaffe, James Aung, Dane Sherburn, Evan Mays, Giulio Starace, Kevin Liu, Leon Maksin, Tejal Patwardhan, et al. Mle-bench: Evaluating machine learning agents on machine learning engineering. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.07095, 2024. · arXiv
  22. Mouxiang Chen, Binyuan Hui, Zeyu Cui, Jiaxi Yang, Dayiheng Liu, Jianling Sun, Junyang Lin, and Zhongxin Liu. Parallel scaling law for language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.10475, 2025. · arXiv
  23. Yongchao Chen, Jiefeng Chen, Rui Meng, Ji Yin, Na Li, Chuchu Fan, Chi Wang, Tomas Pfister, and Jinsung Yoon. Tumix: Multi-agent test-time scaling with tool-use mixture, 2025. URL https:// arxiv.org/abs/2510.01279. · arXiv
  24. James W. Cooley and John W. Tukey. An algorithm for the machine calculation of complex Fourier series. Mathematics of Computation, 19(90):297-301, 1965.
  25. Alexander Cowtan, Silas Dilkes, Ross Duncan, Alexandre Krajenbrink, Will Simmons, and Seyon Sivarajah. On the qubit routing problem. In 14th Conference on the Theory of Quantum Computation, Communication and Cryptography (TQC 2019), volume 135 of Leibniz International Proceedings in In- formatics (LIPIcs), pages 5:1-5:32. Schloss Dagstuhl -Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2019. doi: 10.4230/LIPIcs.TQC.2019.5. · DOI
  26. Weinan Dai, Hanlin Wu, Qiying Yu, Huan-ang Gao, Jiahao Li, Chengquan Jiang, Weiqiang Lou, Yu- fan Song, Hongli Yu, and et al. Chen, Jiaze. Cuda agent: Large-scale agentic rl for high-performance cuda kernel generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.24286, 2026. · arXiv
  27. Yaxin Du, Yuzhu Cai, Yifan Zhou, Cheng Wang, Yu Qian, Xianghe Pang, Qian Liu, Yue Hu, and Siheng Chen. Swe-dev: Evaluating and training autonomous feature-driven software development. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.16975, 2025. · arXiv
  28. Xidong Feng, Ziyu Wan, Muning Wen, Stephen Marcus McAleer, Ying Wen, Weinan Zhang, and Jun Wang. Alphazero-like tree-search can guide large language model decoding and training. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.17179, 2023. · arXiv
  29. Richard P. Feynman. Simulating physics with computers. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 21(6):467-488, 1982. ISSN 1572-9575. doi: 10.1007/BF02650179. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/ BF02650179. · DOI · Paper page
  30. Jerome H Friedman, Trevor Hastie, and Rob Tibshirani. Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. Journal of statistical software, 33:1-22, 2010.
  31. Huan-ang Gao, Jiayi Geng, Wenyue Hua, Mengkang Hu, Xinzhe Juan, Hongzhang Liu, Shilong Liu, Jiahao Qiu, Xuan Qi, Yiran Wu, et al. A survey of self-evolving agents: On path to artificial super intelligence. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.21046, 1, 2025. · arXiv
  32. Leo Gao, John Schulman, and Jacob Hilton. Scaling laws for reward model overoptimization. In Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 202 of Proceedings of Ma- chine Learning Research, pages 10835-10866. PMLR, 2023. URL https://proceedings.mlr.press/ v202/gao23h.html.
  33. Bogdan Georgiev, Javier Gómez-Serrano, Terence Tao, and Adam Zsolt Wagner. Mathematical exploration and discovery at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.02864, 2025. · arXiv
  34. Bogdan Georgiev, Javier Gómez-Serrano, Terence Tao, and Adam Zsolt Wagner. Mathematical exploration and discovery at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.02864, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/ abs/2511.02864. · arXiv
  35. Google Quantum AI et al. Quantum error correction below the surface code threshold. Nature, 638 (8052):920-926, 2025.
  36. Lov K Grover. A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search. In Proceedings of the twenty-eighth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pages 212-219, 1996.
  37. Daya Guo, Dejian Yang, Haowei Zhang, Junxiao Song, Peiyi Wang, Qihao Zhu, Runxin Xu, Ruoyu Zhang, Shirong Ma, Xiao Bi, et al. Deepseek-r1: Incentivizing reasoning capability in llms via reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.12948, 2025. · arXiv
  38. Katalin Gyarmati, François Hennecart, and Imre Z. Ruzsa. Sums and differences of finite sets. Func- tiones et Approximatio Commentarii Mathematici, 37(1):175-186, 2007.
  39. Jan Kristian Haugland. The minimum overlap problem revisited, 2016. URL https://arxiv.org/ abs/1609.08000. · arXiv
  40. Peter V. Hegarty. Some explicit constructions of sets with more sums than differences. Acta Arith- metica, 130(1):61-77, 2007. doi: 10.4064/aa130-1-4. · DOI
  41. Mhand Hifi and Rym M'Hallah. A literature review on circle and sphere packing problems: Models and methodologies. Advances in Operations Research, 2009:150624, 2009. doi: 10.1155/2009/150624. · DOI
  42. Chengsong Huang, Wenhao Yu, Xiaoyang Wang, Hongming Zhang, Zongxia Li, Ruosen Li, Jiaxin Huang, Haitao Mi, and Dong Yu. R-zero: Self-evolving reasoning llm from zero data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.05004, 2025. · arXiv
  43. Thomas Hubert, Rishi Mehta, Laurent Sartran, Miklós Z Horváth, Goran Žužić, Eric Wieser, Aja Huang, Julian Schrittwieser, Yannick Schroecker, Hussain Masoom, et al. Olympiad-level formal mathematical reasoning with reinforcement learning. Nature, pages 1-3, 2025.
  44. Tal Ifargan, Lukas Hafner, Maor Kern, Ori Alcalay, and Roy Kishony. Autonomous LLM-driven research -from data to human-verifiable research papers. NEJM AI, 2(1), 2025. doi: 10.1056/ AIoa2400555. URL https://doi.org/10.1056/AIoa2400555. · DOI · Paper page
  45. Yuki Imajuku, Kohki Horie, Yoichi Iwata, Kensho Aoki, Naohiro Takahashi, and Takuya Akiba. ALE-Bench: A benchmark for long-horizon objective-driven algorithm engineering, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.09050. · arXiv
  46. Yuichi Inoue, Kou Misaki, Yuki Imajuku, So Kuroki, Taishi Nakamura, and Takuya Akiba. Wider or deeper? scaling llm inference-time compute with adaptive branching tree search, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.04412. · arXiv
  47. Takehiro Ito, Naonori Kakimura, Naoyuki Kamiyama, Yusuke Kobayashi, and Yoshio Okamoto. Algorithmic theory of qubit routing. In Algorithms and Data Structures Symposium, pages 533-546. Springer, 2023.
  48. Aaron Jaech, Adam Kalai, Adam Lerer, Adam Richardson, Ahmed El-Kishky, Aiden Low, Alec Helyar, Aleksander Madry, Alex Beutel, Alex Carney, et al. Openai o1 system card. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.16720, 2024. · arXiv
  49. Albert Q. Jiang, Alexandre Sablayrolles, Arthur Mensch, Chris Bamford, Devendra Singh Chaplot, Diego de las Casas, Florian Bressand, Gianna Lengyel, Guillaume Lample, Lucile Saulnier, Lélio Re- nard Lavaud, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Pierre Stock, Teven Le Scao, Thibaut Lavril, Thomas Wang, Tim- othée Lacroix, and William El Sayed. Mistral 7b, 2023. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.06825. · arXiv
  50. Dongfu Jiang, Xiang Ren, and Bill Yuchen Lin. Llm-blender: Ensembling large language models with pairwise ranking and generative fusion. In Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Associ- ation for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 14165-14178, 2023.
  51. Carlos E Jimenez, John Yang, Alexander Wettig, Shunyu Yao, Kexin Pei, Ofir Press, and Karthik R Narasimhan. SWE-bench: Can language models resolve real-world github issues? In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2024. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id= VTF8yNQM66.
  52. Yubin Kim, Ken Gu, Chanwoo Park, Chunjong Park, Samuel Schmidgall, A. Ali Heydari, Yao Yan, Zhihan Zhang, Yuchen Zhuang, Yun Liu, Mark Malhotra, Paul Pu Liang, Hae Won Park, Yuzhe Yang, Xuhai Xu, Yilun Du, Shwetak Patel, Tim Althoff, Daniel McDuff, and Xin Liu. Towards a science of scaling agent systems, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.08296. · arXiv
  53. Morten Kjaergaard, Mollie E Schwartz, Jochen Braumüller, Philip Krantz, Joel I-J Wang, Simon Gustavsson, and William D Oliver. Superconducting qubits: Current state of play. Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics, 11(1):369-395, 2020.
  54. Robert Tjarko Lange, Yuki Imajuku, and Edoardo Cetin. Shinkaevolve: Towards open-ended and sample-efficient program evolution. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.19349, 2025. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2509. 19349. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.19349. · DOI · Paper page
  55. Ang Li, Samuel Stein, Sriram Krishnamoorthy, and James Ang. Qasmbench: A low-level quantum benchmark suite for nisq evaluation and simulation. ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing, 4 (2):1-26, 2023.
  56. Gushu Li, Yufei Ding, and Yuan Xie. Tackling the qubit mapping problem for nisq-era quantum de- vices. In Proceedings of the twenty-fourth international conference on architectural support for programming languages and operating systems, pages 1001-1014, 2019.
  57. Houyi Li, Wenzhen Zheng, Jingcheng Hu, Qiufeng Wang, Hanshan Zhang, Zili Wang, Shijie Xuyang, Yuantao Fan, Shuigeng Zhou, Xiangyu Zhang, et al. Predictable scale: Part i-optimal hyperparameter scaling law in large language model pretraining. arXiv e-prints, pages arXiv-2503, 2025.
  58. Haowei Lin, Baizhou Huang, Haotian Ye, Qinyu Chen, Zihao Wang, Sujian Li, Jianzhu Ma, Xiaojun Wan, James Zou, and Yitao Liang. Selecting large language model to fine-tune via rectified scaling law. In International Conference on Machine Learning, 2024.
  59. Haowei Lin, Haotian Ye, Wenzheng Feng, Quzhe Huang, Yujun Li, Hubert Lim, Zhengrui Li, Xi- angyu Wang, Jianzhu Ma, Yitao Liang, and James Y. Zou. Can language models discover scaling laws? In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2026. URL https://openreview.net/ forum?id=TPTtWC0pGk.
  60. Wan-Hsuan Lin, Daniel Bochen Tan, and Jason Cong. Reuse-aware compilation for zoned quantum architectures based on neutral atoms. In 2025 IEEE International Symposium on High Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA), pages 127-142. IEEE, 2025.
  61. George C Linderman, Jun Zhao, Manolis Roulis, Piotr Bielecki, Richard A Flavell, Boaz Nadler, and Yuval Kluger. Zero-preserving imputation of single-cell rna-seq data. Nature communications, 13(1): 192, 2022.
  62. Shu Liu, Shubham Agarwal, Monishwaran Maheswaran, Mert Cemri, Zhifei Li, Qiuyang Mang, Ashwin Naren, Ethan Boneh, Audrey Cheng, Melissa Z. Pan, Alexander Du, Kurt Keutzer, Alvin Cheung, Alexandros G. Dimakis, Koushik Sen, Matei Zaharia, and Ion Stoica. Evox: Meta-evolution for automated discovery. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.23413, 2026. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.23413. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.23413. · DOI · Paper page
  63. Tengxiao Liu, Zifeng Wang, Jin Miao, I-Hung Hsu, Jun Yan, Jiefeng Chen, Rujun Han, Fangyuan Xu, Yanfei Chen, Ke Jiang, Samira Daruki, Yi Liang, William Yang Wang, Tomas Pfister, and Chen- Yu Lee. Budget-aware tool-use enables effective agent scaling, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2511.17006.
  64. Seth Lloyd. Universal quantum simulators. Science, 273(5278):1073-1078, 1996.
  65. Chris Lu, Cong Lu, Robert Tjarko Lange, Yutaro Yamada, Shengran Hu, Jakob Foerster, David Ha, and Jeff Clune. Towards end-to-end automation of ai research. Nature, 651(8107):914-919, 2026. doi: 10.1038/s41586-026-10265-5. URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10265-5. · DOI · Paper page
  66. Malte D Luecken, Scott Gigante, Daniel B Burkhardt, Robrecht Cannoodt, Daniel C Strobl, Niko- lay S Markov, Luke Zappia, Giovanni Palla, Wesley Lewis, Daniel Dimitrov, et al. Defining and benchmarking open problems in single-cell analysis. Nature Biotechnology, 43(7):1035-1040, 2025.
  67. Evan Z Macosko, Anindita Basu, Rahul Satija, James Nemesh, Karthik Shekhar, Melissa Goldman, Itay Tirosh, Allison R Bialas, Nolan Kamitaki, Emily M Martersteck, et al. Highly parallel genome- wide expression profiling of individual cells using nanoliter droplets. Cell, 161(5):1202-1214, 2015.
  68. Aman Madaan, Niket Tandon, Prakhar Gupta, Skyler Hallinan, Luyu Gao, Sarah Wiegreffe, Uri Alon, Nouha Dziri, Shrimai Prabhumoye, Yiming Yang, Shashank Gupta, Bodhisattwa Prasad Majumder, Katherine Hermann, Sean Welleck, Amir Yazdanbakhsh, and Peter Clark. Self- refine: Iterative refinement with self-feedback. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Sys- tems, volume 36, 2023. URL https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2023/hash/ 91edff07232fb1b55a505a9e9f6c0ff3-Abstract-Conference.html.
  69. Greg Martin and Kevin O'Bryant. Many sets have more sums than differences, 2006. URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/math/0608131.
  70. Máté Matolcsi and Carlos Vinuesa. Improved bounds on the supremum of autoconvolutions. Jour- nal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 372(2):439-447, 2010.
  71. Tingjia Miao, Wenkai Jin, Muhua Zhang, Jinxin Tan, Yuelin Hu, Tu Guo, Jiejun Zhang, Yuhan Wang, Wenbo Li, Yinuo Gao, Shuo Chen, Weiqi Jiang, Yayun Hu, Zixing Lei, Xianghe Pang, Zexi Liu, Yuzhi Zhang, Linfeng Zhang, Kun Chen, Wei Wang, Weinan E, and Siheng Chen. Prl-bench: A comprehensive benchmark evaluating llms' capabilities in frontier physics research, 2026. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.15411. · arXiv
  72. Niklas Muennighoff, Zitong Yang, Weijia Shi, Xiang Lisa Li, Li Fei-Fei, Hannaneh Hajishirzi, Luke Zettlemoyer, Percy Liang, Emmanuel Candès, and Tatsunori Hashimoto. s1: Simple test-time scal- ing. In Christos Christodoulopoulos, Tanmoy Chakraborty, Carolyn Rose, and Violet Peng, edi- tors, Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 20275-20321, Suzhou, China, November 2025. Association for Computational Linguistics. ISBN 979- 8-89176-332-6. doi: 10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-main.1025. URL https://aclanthology.org/2025. emnlp-main.1025/. · DOI · Paper page
  73. Prakash Murali, Jonathan M Baker, Ali Javadi-Abhari, Frederic T Chong, and Margaret Martonosi. Noise-adaptive compiler mappings for noisy intermediate-scale quantum computers. In Proceed- ings of the twenty-fourth international conference on architectural support for programming languages and operating systems, pages 1015-1029, 2019.
  74. Giacomo Nannicini, Lev S Bishop, Oktay Günlük, and Petar Jurcevic. Optimal qubit assignment and routing via integer programming. ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing, 4(1):1-31, 2022.
  75. Michael A Nielsen and Isaac L Chuang. Quantum computation and quantum information. Cambridge university press, 2010.
  76. Alexander Novikov, Ngân Vũ, Marvin Eisenberger, Emilien Dupont, Po-Sen Huang, Adam Zsolt Wagner, Sergey Shirobokov, Borislav Kozlovskii, Francisco J. R. Ruiz, Abbas Mehrabian, M. Pawan Kumar, Abigail See, Swarat Chaudhuri, George Holland, Alex Davies, Sebastian Nowozin, Push- meet Kohli, and Matej Balog. Alphaevolve: A coding agent for scientific and algorithmic discovery. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.13131, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.13131. · arXiv
  77. William P. Orrick, Bruce Solomon, Roland Dowdeswell, and Warren D. Smith. New lower bounds for the maximal determinant problem, 2003. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0304410. · arXiv
  78. Anne Ouyang, Simon Guo, Simran Arora, Alex L Zhang, William Hu, Christopher Ré, and Azalia Mirhoseini. Kernelbench: Can llms write efficient gpu kernels? arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.10517, 2025. · arXiv
  79. Richard Yuanzhe Pang, Vishakh Padmakumar, Thibault Sellam, Ankur Parikh, and He He. Reward gaming in conditional text generation. In Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 4746-4763, 2023. doi: 10.18653/v1/2023. acl-long.262. URL https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.262. · DOI
  80. Ronald Peikert, Diethelm Würtz, Michael Monagan, and Claas de Groot. Packing circles in a square: A review and new results. In System Modelling and Optimization, volume 180 of Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, pages 45-54. Springer, 1992. doi: 10.1007/BFb0113271. · DOI
  81. Matteo G Pozzi, Steven J Herbert, Akash Sengupta, and Robert D Mullins. Using reinforcement learning to perform qubit routing in quantum compilers. ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing, 3(2):1-25, 2022.
  82. Ori Press, Brandon Amos, Haoyu Zhao, Yikai Wu, Samuel K Ainsworth, Dominik Krupke, Patrick Kidger, Touqir Sajed, Bartolomeo Stellato, Jisun Park, et al. Algotune: Can language models speed up general-purpose numerical programs? arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.15887, 2025. · arXiv
  83. Ao Qu, Han Zheng, Zijian Zhou, Yihao Yan, Yihong Tang, Shao Yong Ong, Fenglu Hong, Kaichen Zhou, Chonghe Jiang, Minwei Kong, et al. Coral: Towards autonomous multi-agent evolution for open-ended discovery. arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.01658, 2026. · arXiv
  84. Anthony Ransford, MS Allman, Jake Arkinstall, JP Campora III, Samuel F Cooper, Robert D Delaney, Joan M Dreiling, Brian Estey, Caroline Figgatt, Alex Hall, et al. Helios: A 98-qubit trapped-ion quantum computer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.05465, 2025. · arXiv
  85. Benjamin Recht, Rebecca Roelofs, Ludwig Schmidt, and Vaishaal Shankar. Do ImageNet classi- fiers generalize to ImageNet? In Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learn- ing, volume 97 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 5389-5400. PMLR, 2019. URL https://proceedings.mlr.press/v97/recht19a.html.
  86. Maxime Robeyns, Martin Szummer, and Laurence Aitchison. A self-improving coding agent. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.15228, 2025. · arXiv
  87. Bernardino Romera-Paredes, Mohammadamin Barekatain, Alexander Novikov, Matej Balog, M. Pawan Kumar, Emilien Dupont, Francisco J. R. Ruiz, Jordan S. Ellenberg, Pengming Wang, Omar Fawzi, Pushmeet Kohli, and Alhussein Fawzi. Mathematical discoveries from program search with large language models. Nature, 625(7995):468-475, 2024. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06924-6. URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06924-6. · DOI · Paper page
  88. Bernardino Romera-Paredes, Mohammadamin Barekatain, Alexander Novikov, Matej Balog, M Pawan Kumar, Emilien Dupont, Francisco JR Ruiz, Jordan S Ellenberg, Pengming Wang, Omar Fawzi, et al. Mathematical discoveries from program search with large language models. Nature, 625(7995):468-475, 2024.
  89. Christopher D. Rosin. Multi-armed bandits with episode context. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 61(3):203-230, March 2011. doi: 10.1007/s10472-011-9258-6. URL https://doi.org/10. 1007/s10472-011-9258-6. · DOI
  90. Imre Z. Ruzsa. On the cardinality of a + a and a -a. In Combinatorics (Keszthely, 1976), volume 18 of Colloquia Mathematica Societatis János Bolyai, pages 933-938. North-Holland, Amsterdam-New York, 1978.
  91. Imre Z. Ruzsa. Sums of finite sets. In David V. Chudnovsky, Gregory V. Chudnovsky, and Melvyn B. Nathanson, editors, Number Theory: New York Seminar 1991-1995, chapter 21, pages 281- 293. Springer, New York, NY, 1996. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-2418-1_21. · DOI
  92. Samuel Schmidgall, Yusheng Su, Ze Wang, Ximeng Sun, Jialian Wu, Xiaodong Yu, Jiang Liu, Michael Moor, Zicheng Liu, and Emad Barsoum. Agent laboratory: Using llm agents as research assistants. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2025, pages 5977- 6043, 2025. doi: 10.18653/v1/2025.findings-emnlp.320. URL https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025. findings-emnlp.320. · DOI · Paper page
  93. Sheikh Shafayat, Fahim Tajwar, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, Jeff Schneider, and Andrea Zanette. Can large reasoning models self-train? arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.21444, 2025. · arXiv
  94. Zhihong Shao, Peiyi Wang, Qihao Zhu, Runxin Xu, Junxiao Song, Xiao Bi, Haowei Zhang, Mingchuan Zhang, YK Li, et al. Deepseekmath: Pushing the limits of mathematical reasoning in open language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.03300, 2024. · arXiv
  95. Noah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik R. Narasimhan, and Shunyu Yao. Re- flexion: Language agents with verbal reinforcement learning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2023. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=vAElhFcKW6.
  96. Parshin Shojaee, Kazem Meidani, Shashank Gupta, Amir Barati Farimani, and Chandan K. Reddy. LLM-SR: Scientific equation discovery via programming with large language models. In The Thir- teenth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2025. URL https://openreview.net/ forum?id=m2nmp8P5in.
  97. Parshin Shojaee, Ngoc-Hieu Nguyen, Kazem Meidani, Amir Barati Farimani, Khoa D Doan, and Chandan K Reddy. Llm-srbench: A new benchmark for scientific equation discovery with large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.10415, 2025. · arXiv
  98. Peter W Shor. Polynomial-time algorithms for prime factorization and discrete logarithms on a quantum computer. SIAM review, 41(2):303-332, 1999.
  99. Chenglei Si, Diyi Yang, and Tatsunori Hashimoto. Can LLMs generate novel research ideas? a large-scale human study with 100+ NLP researchers. In The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2025. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=M23dTGWCZy.
  100. David Silver, Julian Schrittwieser, Karen Simonyan, Ioannis Antonoglou, Aja Huang, Arthur Guez, Thomas Hubert, Lucas Baker, Matthew Lai, Adrian Bolton, Yutian Chen, Timothy Lillicrap, Fan Hui, Laurent Sifre, George van den Driessche, Thore Graepel, and Demis Hassabis. Mastering the game of Go without human knowledge. Nature, 550(7676):354-359, October 2017. doi: 10.1038/ nature24270. URL https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24270. · DOI · Paper page
  101. David Silver, Thomas Hubert, Julian Schrittwieser, Ioannis Antonoglou, Matthew Lai, Arthur Guez, Marc Lanctot, Laurent Sifre, Dharshan Kumaran, Thore Graepel, Timothy Lillicrap, Karen Simonyan, and Demis Hassabis. A general reinforcement learning algorithm that masters chess, shogi, and go through self-play. Science, 362(6419):1140-1144, 2018. doi: 10.1126/science.aar6404. URL https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.aar6404. · DOI · Paper page
  102. Animesh Sinha, Utkarsh Azad, and Harjinder Singh. Qubit routing using graph neural network aided monte carlo tree search. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, volume 36, pages 9935-9943, 2022.
  103. Marcos Yukio Siraichi, Vinícius Fernandes dos Santos, Caroline Collange, and Fernando Magno Quintão Pereira. Qubit allocation. In Proceedings of the 2018 international symposium on code generation and optimization, pages 113-125, 2018.
  104. Seyon Sivarajah, Silas Dilkes, Alexander Cowtan, Will Simmons, Alec Edgington, and Ross Duncan. t| ket>: a retargetable compiler for nisq devices. Quantum Science & Technology, 6(1):014003, 2021.
  105. Charlie Snell, Jaehoon Lee, Kelvin Xu, and Aviral Kumar. Scaling llm test-time compute optimally can be more effective than scaling model parameters, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2408. 03314.
  106. Yifan Song, Guoyin Wang, Sujian Li, and Bill Yuchen Lin. The good, the bad, and the greedy: Eval- uation of llms should not ignore non-determinism. In Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 4195-4206, 2025.
  107. Yannick Stade, Ludwig Schmid, Lukas Burgholzer, and Robert Wille. An abstract model and effi- cient routing for logical entangling gates on zoned neutral atom architectures. In 2024 IEEE Inter- national Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE), volume 1, pages 784-795. IEEE, 2024.
  108. Yannick Stade, Lukas Burgholzer, and Robert Wille. Search smarter, not harder: A scalable, high- quality zoned neutral atom compiler. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.13790, 2025. · arXiv
  109. Yannick Stade, Wan-Hsuan Lin, Jason Cong, and Robert Wille. Routing-aware placement for zoned neutral atom-based quantum computing. In 2025 IEEE/ACM International Conference On Computer Aided Design (ICCAD), pages 1-9. IEEE, 2025.
  110. Giulio Starace, Oliver Jaffe, Dane Sherburn, James Aung, Jun Shern Chan, Leon Maksin, Rachel Dias, Evan Mays, Benjamin Kinsella, Wyatt Thompson, et al. Paperbench: Evaluating ai's ability to replicate ai research. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.01848, 2025. · arXiv
  111. Haoyang Su, Renqi Chen, Shixiang Tang, Zhenfei Yin, Xinzhe Zheng, Jinzhe Li, Biqing Qi, Qi Wu, Hui Li, Wanli Ouyang, et al. Many heads are better than one: Improved scientific idea generation by a llm-based multi-agent system. In Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 28201-28240, 2025.
  112. Haotian Sun, Yuchen Zhuang, Lingkai Kong, Bo Dai, and Chao Zhang. Adaplanner: Adaptive planning from feedback with language models. Advances in neural information processing systems, 36: 58202-58245, 2023.
  113. Péter G. Szabó, Mihály Cś. Markót, Tibor Csendes, Eckard Specht, Leopoldo G. Casado, and István García. New Approaches to Circle Packing in a Square: With Program Codes. Springer, 2007. doi: 10. 1007/978-0-387-45676-8. · DOI
  114. Bochen Tan and Jason Cong. Optimal layout synthesis for quantum computing. In Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Computer-Aided Design, pages 1-9, 2020.
  115. Daniel Bochen Tan, Wan-Hsuan Lin, and Jason Cong. Compilation for dynamically field- programmable qubit arrays with efficient and provably near-optimal scheduling. In Proceedings of the 30th Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference, pages 921-929, 2025.
  116. Heng Tang, Feng Liu, Xinbo Chen, Jiawei Chen, Bohao Wang, Changwang Zhang, Jun Wang, Yue- gang Sun, Bingde Hu, and Can Wang. Bridging the gap: Self-optimized fine-tuning for llm-based recommender systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.20771, 2025. · arXiv
  117. Jiabin Tang, Lianghao Xia, Zhonghang Li, and Chao Huang. Ai-researcher: Autonomous scientific innovation. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2025. URL https://openreview. net/forum?id=kQWyOYUAC4.
  118. Wei Tang, Yiheng Duan, Yaroslav Kharkov, Rasool Fakoor, Eric Kessler, and Yunong Shi. Al- pharouter: Quantum circuit routing with reinforcement learning and tree search. In 2024 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE), volume 1, pages 930-940. IEEE, 2024.
  119. Amir Taubenfeld, Tom Sheffer, Eran Ofek, Amir Feder, Ariel Goldstein, Zorik Gekhman, and Gal Yona. Confidence improves self-consistency in llms. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2025, pages 20090-20111, 2025.
  120. ByteDance AML AI4Science Team, Xinshi Chen, Yuxuan Zhang, Chan Lu, Wenzhi Ma, Jiaqi Guan, Chengyue Gong, Jincai Yang, Hanyu Zhang, Ke Zhang, Shenghao Wu, Kuangqi Zhou, Yanping Yang, Zhenyu Liu, Lan Wang, Bo Shi, Shaochen Shi, and Wenzhi Xiao. Protenix -advancing struc- ture prediction through a comprehensive alphafold3 reproduction. bioRxiv, 2025. doi: 10.1101/2025. 01.08.631967. URL https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2025/01/11/2025.01.08.631967. · DOI
  121. Gemma Team, Thomas Mesnard, Cassidy Hardin, Robert Dadashi, and et al. Surya Bhupatiraju. Gemma: Open models based on gemini research and technology, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/ abs/2403.08295. · arXiv
  122. Ye Tian, Baolin Peng, Linfeng Song, Lifeng Jin, Dian Yu, Lei Han, Haitao Mi, and Dong Yu. To- ward self-improvement of LLMs via imagination, searching, and criticizing. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2024. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=tPdJ2qHkOB.
  123. Robert Tibshirani, Jacob Bien, Jerome Friedman, Trevor Hastie, Noah Simon, Jonathan Taylor, and Ryan J Tibshirani. Strong rules for discarding predictors in lasso-type problems. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 74(2):245-266, 2012.
  124. Hugo Touvron, Louis Martin, Kevin Stone, Peter Albert, Amjad Almahairi, Yasmine Babaei, Nikolay Bashlykov, Soumya Batra, Prajjwal Bhargava, Shruti Bhosale, et al. Llama 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.09288, 2023. · arXiv
  125. Trieu H Trinh, Yuhuai Wu, Quoc V Le, He He, and Thang Luong. Solving olympiad geometry without human demonstrations. Nature, 625(7995):476-482, 2024.
  126. Catalina A Vallejos, Davide Risso, Antonio Scialdone, Sandrine Dudoit, and John C Marioni. Nor- malizing single-cell rna sequencing data: challenges and opportunities. Nature methods, 14(6):565- 571, 2017.
  127. David Van Dijk, Roshan Sharma, Juozas Nainys, Kristina Yim, Pooja Kathail, Ambrose J Carr, Cas- sandra Burdziak, Kevin R Moon, Christine L Chaffer, Diwakar Pattabiraman, et al. Recovering gene interactions from single-cell data using data diffusion. Cell, 174(3):716-729, 2018.
  128. Carlos Vinuesa del Rio. Generalized Sidon Sets. PhD thesis, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 2010.
  129. Evan Wang, Federico Cassano, Catherine Wu, Yunfeng Bai, Will Song, Vaskar Nath, Ziwen Han, Sean Hendryx, Summer Yue, and Hugh Zhang. Planning in natural language improves llm search for code generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.03733, 2024. · arXiv
  130. Hongru Wang, Cheng Qian, Wanjun Zhong, Xiusi Chen, Jiahao Qiu, Shijue Huang, Bowen Jin, Mengdi Wang, Kam-Fai Wong, and Heng Ji. Otc: Optimal tool calls via reinforcement learning. arXiv e-prints, pages arXiv-2504, 2025.
  131. Tevin Wang and Chenyan Xiong. Autorule: Reasoning chain-of-thought extracted rule-based re- wards improve preference learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.15651, 2025. · arXiv
  132. Xuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc V. Le, Ed H. Chi, Sharan Narang, Aakanksha Chowdhery, and Denny Zhou. Self-consistency improves chain of thought reasoning in language models. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023. URL https://openreview.net/ forum?id=1PL1NIMMrw. Poster.
  133. Yiping Wang, Shao-Rong Su, Zhiyuan Zeng, Eva Xu, Liliang Ren, Xinyu Yang, Zeyi Huang, Xue- hai He, Luyao Ma, Baolin Peng, Hao Cheng, Pengcheng He, Weizhu Chen, Shuohang Wang, Si- mon Shaolei Du, and Yelong Shen. Thetaevolve: Test-time learning on open problems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.23473, 2025. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2511.23473. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.23473. · DOI · Paper page
  134. Sean Welleck, Ximing Lu, Peter West, Faeze Brahman, Tianxiao Shen, Daniel Khashabi, and Yejin Choi. Generating sequences by learning to self-correct. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=hH36JeQZDaO.
  135. Ronald J Williams. Simple statistical gradient-following algorithms for connectionist reinforcement learning. Machine learning, 8(3):229-256, 1992.
  136. Tung-Yu Wu and Pei-Yu Lo. U-shaped and inverted-u scaling behind emergent abilities of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.01692, 2024. · arXiv
  137. Yangzhen Wu, Zhiqing Sun, Shanda Li, Sean Welleck, and Yiming Yang. Inference scaling laws: An empirical analysis of compute-optimal inference for problem-solving with language models, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.00724. · arXiv
  138. Zicheng Xu, Guanchu Wang, Guangyao Zheng, Yu-Neng Chuang, Alexander Szalay, Xia Hu, and Vladimir Braverman. Self-ensemble: Mitigating confidence distortion for large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.01951, 2025. · arXiv
  139. Yutaro Yamada, Robert Tjarko Lange, Cong Lu, Shengran Hu, Chris Lu, Jakob Foerster, Jeff Clune, and David Ha. The ai scientist-v2: Workshop-level automated scientific discovery via agentic tree search, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.08066. · arXiv
  140. John Yang, Carlos E Jimenez, Alexander Wettig, Kilian Lieret, Shunyu Yao, Karthik R Narasimhan, and Ofir Press. SWE-agent: Agent-computer interfaces enable automated software engineering. In The Thirty-eighth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2024. URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/2405.15793.
  141. Rui Yang, Ziruo Wang, Yuntian Gu, Tianyi Chen, Yitao Liang, and Tongyang Li. Qcircuitbench: A large-scale dataset for benchmarking quantum algorithm design. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.07961, 2024. · arXiv
  142. Shunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran, Tom Griffiths, Yuan Cao, and Karthik Narasimhan. Tree of thoughts: Deliberate problem solving with large language mod- els. In Alice Oh, Tristan Naumann, Amir Globerson, Kate Saenko, Moritz Hardt, and Sergey Levine, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36: Annual Con- ference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2023, NeurIPS 2023, New Orleans, LA, USA, December 10 -16, 2023, 2023. URL http://papers.nips.cc/paper_files/paper/2023/hash/ 271db9922b8d1f4dd7aaef84ed5ac703-Abstract-Conference.html.
  143. Shunyu Yao, Jeffrey Zhao, Dian Yu, Nan Du, Izhak Shafran, Karthik R. Narasimhan, and Yuan Cao. React: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2023, Kigali, Rwanda, May 1-5, 2023. OpenReview.net, 2023. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=WE_vluYUL-X.
  144. Jiasheng Ye, Peiju Liu, Tianxiang Sun, Jun Zhan, Yunhua Zhou, and Xipeng Qiu. Data mixing laws: Optimizing data mixtures by predicting language modeling performance. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.16952, 2024. · arXiv
  145. Zhaojian Yu, Kaiyue Feng, Yilun Zhao, Shilin He, Xiao-Ping Zhang, and Arman Cohan. Al- pharesearch: Accelerating new algorithm discovery with language models, 2025. URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/2511.08522.
  146. Mert Yuksekgonul, Daniel Koceja, Xinhao Li, Federico Bianchi, Jed McCaleb, Xiaolong Wang, Jan Kautz, Yejin Choi, James Zou, Carlos Guestrin, et al. Learning to discover at test time. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.16175, 2026. · arXiv
  147. Eric Zelikman, Yuhuai Wu, Jesse Mu, and Noah Goodman. Star: Bootstrapping reasoning with reasoning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:15476-15488, 2022.
  148. Eric Zelikman, Georges Harik, Yijia Shao, Varuna Jayasiri, Nick Haber, and Noah D Goodman. Quiet-star: Language models can teach themselves to think before speaking. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.09629, 2024. · arXiv
  149. Alex L. Zhang, Matej Sirovatka, Erik Schultheis, Benjamin Horowitz, and Mark Saroufim. Kernel- bot: A competition platform for writing heterogeneous GPU code. In CODEML@ICML25, 2025. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=bq9U4dmuyJ.
  150. Qiyuan Zhang, Fuyuan Lyu, Zexu Sun, Lei Wang, Weixu Zhang, Zhihan Guo, Yufei Wang, Niklas Muennighoff, Irwin King, Xue Liu, and Chen Ma. What, how, where, and how well? a survey on test-time scaling in large language models, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.24235. · arXiv
  151. Qiyuan Zhang, Fuyuan Lyu, Zexu Sun, Lei Wang, Weixu Zhang, Wenyue Hua, Haolun Wu, Zhihan Guo, Yufei Wang, Niklas Muennighoff, et al. A survey on test-time scaling in large language models: What, how, where, and how well? arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.24235, 2025. · arXiv
  152. Andrew Zhao, Yiran Wu, Yang Yue, Tong Wu, Quentin Xu, Matthieu Lin, Shenzhi Wang, Qingyun Wu, Zilong Zheng, and Gao Huang. Absolute zero: Reinforced self-play reasoning with zero data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.03335, 2025. · arXiv
  153. Wanjia Zhao, Mert Yuksekgonul, Shirley Wu, and James Zou. Sirius: Self-improving multi-agent systems via bootstrapped reasoning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.04780, 2025. · arXiv
  154. Grace XY Zheng, Jessica M Terry, Phillip Belgrader, Paul Ryvkin, Zachary W Bent, Ryan Wilson, Solongo B Ziraldo, Tobias D Wheeler, Geoff P McDermott, Junjie Zhu, et al. Massively parallel digital transcriptional profiling of single cells. Nature communications, 8(1):14049, 2017.
  155. King Zhu, Hanhao Li, Siwei Wu, Tianshun Xing, Dehua Ma, Xiangru Tang, Minghao Liu, Jian Yang, Jiaheng Liu, Yuchen Eleanor Jiang, Changwang Zhang, Chenghua Lin, Jun Wang, Ge Zhang, and Wangchunshu Zhou. Scaling test-time compute for llm agents, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2506.12928.
  156. Henry Zou, Matthew Treinish, Kevin Hartman, Alexander Ivrii, and Jake Lishman. Lightsabre: A lightweight and enhanced SABRE algorithm. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.08368, 2024. URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/2409.08368. · arXiv
  157. Yuxin Zuo, Shang Qu, Yifei Li, Zhangren Chen, Xuekai Zhu, Ermo Hua, Kaiyan Zhang, Ning Ding, and Bowen Zhou. Medxpertqa: Benchmarking expert-level medical reasoning and understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.18362, 2025. · arXiv
  158. Adam Zweiger, Jyothish Pari, Han Guo, Ekin Akyürek, Yoon Kim, and Pulkit Agrawal. Self- adapting language models, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.10943. [-487, -483, -482, -479, -478, -475, -474, -471, -470, -467, -466, -463, -462, -461, -459, -458, -455, -454, -451, -450, -447, -446, -443, -442, -439, -438, -435, -434, -430, -426, -422, -418, -414, -410, -406, -402, -398, -394, -390, -386, -382, -379, -378, -374, -370, -366, -362, -358, -354, -350, -346, -342, -338, -334, -330, -326, -323, -322, -318, -314, -310, -306, -302, -298, -294, -290, -286, -282, -278, -274, -271, -270, -266, -262, -258, -254, -250, -246, -242, -238, -234, -230, -226, -222, -218, -214, -211, -210, -206, -202, -198, -194, -190, -186, -182, -178, -174, -170, -166, -162, -158, -155, -154, -150, -146, -142, -138, -134, -130, -126, -122, -118, -114, -110, -106, -102, -99, -98, -94, -90, -86, -82, -78, -74, -70, -66, -62, -58, -54, -50, -46, -43, -42, -38, -34, -30, -26, -22, -18, -14, -10, -6, -2, 2, 6, 10, 13, 14, 18, 22, 26, 30, 34, 38, 42, 46, 50, 54, 58, 62, 65, 66, 70, 74, 78, 82, 86, 90, 94, 98, 102, 106, 110, 114, 118, 122, 125, 126, 130, 134, 138, 142, 146, 150, 154, 158, 162, 166, 170, 174, 177, 178, 182, 186, 190, 194, 198, 202, 206, 209, 210, 214, 218, 222, 226, 230, 234, 238, 242, 246, 250, 254, 258, 261, 262, 266, 270, 274, 278, 282, 286, 290, 294, 298, 302, 306, 310, 314, 318, 321, 322, 326, 330, 334, 338, 342, 346, 350, 354, 358, 362, 366, 370, 374, 377, 378, 382, 386, 390, 394, 398, 402, 406, 410, 414, 418, 422, 426, 429, 430, 434, 438, 442, 446, 450, 454, 458, 462, 466, 470, 474, 478, 482, 485, 486, 490, 494, 498, 502, 506, 510, 514, 518, 522, 526, 530, 534, 538, 542, 545, 546, 550, 554, 558, 562, 566, 570, 574, 578, 582, 586, 590, 594, 597, 598, 602, 606, 610, 614, 618, 622, 626, 629, 630, 634, 638, 642, 646, 650, 654, 658, 662, 666, 670, 674, 678, 681, 682, 686, 690, 694, 698, 702, 706, 710, 714, 718, 722, 726, 730, 734, 738, 741, 742, 746, 750, 754, 758, 762, 766, 770, 774, 778, 782, 786, 790, 793, 794, 798, 802, 806, 810, 814, 818, 822, 826, 830, 834, 838, 842, 846, 849, 850, 854, 858, 862, 866, 870, 874, 878, 882, 886, 890, 894, 898, 902, 905, 906, 910, 914, 918, 922, 926, 930, 934, 938, 942, 946, 950, 954, 958, 961, 962, 966, 970, 974, 978, 982, 986, 990, 994, 998, 1002, 1006, 1010, 1014, 1017, 1018, 1022, 1026, 1030, 1034, 1038, 1042, 1046, 1050, 1054, 1058, 1062, 1066, 1070, 1074, 1077, 1078, 1082, 1086, 1090, 1094, 1098, 1102, 1106, 1110, 1114, 1118, 1122, 1126, 1129, 1130, 1134, 1138, 1142, 1146, 1150, 1154, 1158, 1162, 1166, 1170, 1174, 1178, 1182, 1185, 1186, 1190, 1194, 1198, 1202, 1206, 1210, 1214, 1218, 1222, 1226, 1230, 1234, 1238, 1241, 1242, 1245, 1246, 1249, 1250, 1253, 1254, 1257, 1258, 1261, 1262, 1265, 1266, 1267, 1269, 1270, 1273, 1274, 1277, 1278, 1281, 1282, 1285, 1286, 1289, 1290, 1293, 1294, 1298] Gap array ∆A (505 consecutive differences). · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ye, H., Lin, H., Tang, J., Luo, Y., Thapa, R., Yang, C., Su, C., Yang, R., Liu, R., Li, R., Li, Z., Sun, P., Gao, C., Ding, D., He, G., Zhang, M., Sun, L., Wang, W., Zhong, Y., Shen, Z., Li, P., Lu, P., Cui, B., He, D., Ma, J., Li, J., Baoyin, H., Choi, Y., Ermon, S., Chu, X., Li, T., Xu, Y., & Zou, J.
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2026
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2604.19341
arXiv
2604.19341
OpenAlex
W7155176741
Cited by
0
References
0
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
Keywords
iterative refinement, parallel search, candidate selection, quantum circuit compilation, mathematical problem solving, post-training, GPT-OSS

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review