Purified OPSD: On-Policy Self-Distillation Without Losing How to Think
Open accessAbstract
On-policy self-distillation (OPSD) has emerged as a promising paradigm for improving LLM reasoning, where a privileged teacher with access to reference solutions provides token-level supervision on the student's own generated trajectories. However, we find that OPSD consistently fails on long chain-of-thought (long-CoT) reasoning models, yielding at best marginal gains while destabilizing the reflective reasoning capability these models depend on. Through a novel decomposition of the teacher's supervision signal, we identify the root cause: the teacher's supervision is dominated by a reference-induced component that drives rote memorization of reference-specific shortcuts, while the question-conditioned, inference-transferable component is ignored or actively opposed. Based on this diagnosis, we propose a two-step solution. First, we construct a reference-only teacher (the same model conditioned on the reference without the question) to isolate the non-transferable component of the supervision signal; the residual after subtracting this component captures the question-conditioned, inference-transferable correction. Second, we use pointwise mutual information (PMI) as the mechanism to transform this residual into a well-formed PMI target distribution that the student can directly distill from, filtering out the reference-induced shortcut. Experiments on four long-CoT models across two datasets demonstrate consistent improvements over both the base model and standard OPSD, while preserving the models' natural epistemic behavior throughout training.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The vanilla on-policy self-distillation recipe consistently fails on long-CoT reasoning models, destabilizing the very reflective behaviors it is meant to strengthen.
“Purified OPSD shows the vanilla recipe consistently fails on long-CoT reasoning models , destabilizing the very reflective behaviors it is meant to strengthen [110]”
From Recursive Self-Improvement in AI: From Bounded Self-Refinement to Autonomous Research Loops (2026) · cites this paper as [110]
Cites
Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network
Hinton, G., Vinyals, O., & Dean, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1503.02531 · Cited by 14,204 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Knowledge distillation [Hinton et al., 2015] transfers knowledge from a teacher to a student via soft label matching.”
Chain-Of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models
Wei, J., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., Bosma, M., Ichter, B., Xia, F., Chi, E., Le, Q. V., & Zhou, D. (2022) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 · doi:10.52202/068431-1800 · Cited by 4,505 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting [Wei et al., 2022] demonstrated that eliciting intermediate reasoning steps substantially improves LLM performance on complex tasks.”
LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models
Hu, E. J., Shen, Y., Wallis, P., Allen-Zhu, Z., Li, Y., Wang, S., Wang, L., & Chen, W. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.09685 · Cited by 2,523 · cited 1× · see citing works
“All methods use LoRA [Hu et al., 2022] adaptation with rank 64.”
Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttention
Kwon, W., Li, Z., Zhuang, S., Sheng, Y., Zheng, L., Yu, C. H., Gonzalez, J., Zhang, H., & Stoica, I. (2023) · Proceedings of the 29th Symposium on Operating Systems Principles · doi:10.1145/3600006.3613165 · Cited by 1,817 · cited 1× · see citing works
“On-policy trajectories are generated using vLLM [Kwon et al., 2023].”
Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model
Rafailov, R., Sharma, A., Mitchell, E., Manning, C. D., Ermon, S., & Finn, C. (2023) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 · doi:10.52202/075280-2338 · Cited by 686 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…reward while remaining close to the clean base distribution P 0 : This objective is the token-level analogue of KL-regularized policy improvement used in RLHF and DPO-style derivations [Rafailov et al., 2024], with P 0 serving as the reference policy and ∆ it serving as the implicit reward.”
DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning
DeepSeek-AI, Guo, D., Yang, D., Zhang, H., Song, J., Wang, P., Zhu, Q., Xu, R., Zhang, R., Ma, S., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.12948 · Cited by 538 · cited 4× · see citing works
“…model (LLM) reasoning have demonstrated that long chain-of-thought (long-CoT) reasoning, where models engage in extended, reflective thinking processes before arriving at answers, can substantially improve performance on complex reasoning tasks [Jaech et al., 2024, Guo et al., 2025, Team, 2024].”
InfluentialSelf-Distilled Reasoner: On-Policy Self-Distillation for Large Language Models
Zhao, S., Xie, Z., Liu, M.-C., et al. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.18734 · Cited by 475 · cited 5×
“We compare three configurations: (1) Base : the base model without any distillation, (2) OPSD-Standard : standard on-policy self-distillation [Zhao et al., 2026] with JSD loss, and (3) OPSD-PMI (Ours) : on-policy self-distillation with our PMI target (Section 3.1).”
InfluentialLight-R1: Curriculum SFT, DPO and RL for Long COT from Scratch and Beyond
Wen, L., Cai, Y., Xiao, F., et al. (2025) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.10460 · Cited by 200 · cited 1×
“Supervised approaches include fine-tuning on curated long-CoT traces [Muennighoff et al., 2025, Ye et al., 2025, Xu et al., 2025, Wen et al., 2025], structured decomposition of reasoning chains [Luo et al., 2025b, Chen et al., 2025b], data-efficient frameworks [Wu et al., 2025], progressive…”
Surface Form Competition: Why the Highest Probability Answer Isn’t Always Right
Holtzman, A., West, P., Shwartz, V., Choi, Y., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.564 · Cited by 127 · cited 1× · see citing works
“PMI has been widely used in NLP for collocation detection [Church and Hanks, 1990], word embedding evaluation [Levy and Goldberg, 2014], and more recently for analyzing the information content of language model predictions [Holtzman et al., 2021].”
Yang, A., Li, A., Yang, B., Zhang, B., Hui, B., Zheng, B., Yu, B., Gao, C., Huang, C., Lv, C., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.09388 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Why Does Self-Distillation (Sometimes) Degrade the Reasoning Capability of LLMs?
Kim, J., Luo, X., Kim, M., et al. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.24472 · Cited by 102 · cited 5×
“This finding is corroborated by concurrent works [Kaur et al., Kim et al., 2026a], which report similarly limited or negative outcomes when applying OPSD to thinking models.”
InfluentialGKD: Generalized Knowledge Distillation for Auto-regressive Sequence Models
Agarwal, R., Vieillard, N., Stańczyk, P., et al. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.13649 · Cited by 84 · cited 3×
“On-Policy Self-Distillation (OPSD) [Agarwal et al., 2024] extends this paradigm by having the student generate its own trajectories and receive token-level feedback from a privileged teacher with access to reference solutions, directly addressing the distribution mismatch problem inherent in…”
Self-Distillation Zero: Self-Revision Turns Binary Rewards into Dense Supervision
He, Y.-H., Kaur, S., Bhaskar, A., et al. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.12002 · Cited by 69 · cited 3×
“Several concurrent works have extended OPSD: Zhao et al. [2026] proposed Self-Distilled Reasoner for general LLM reasoning, He et al. [2026] introduced Self-Distillation Zero combining self-revision with binary rewards to provide dense supervision, and Cui et al. [2026] provided a comprehensive…”
Unveiling the Key Factors for Distilling Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
Chen, X.-H., Sun, Z., Guo, W.-J., et al. (2025) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.18001 · Cited by 54 · cited 1×
“…[Muennighoff et al., 2025, Ye et al., 2025, Xu et al., 2025, Wen et al., 2025], structured decomposition of reasoning chains [Luo et al., 2025b, Chen et al., 2025b], data-efficient frameworks [Wu et al., 2025], progressive training through the “valley” of capability [Luo et al., 2025a],…”
OpenAI, :, Jaech, A., Kalai, A., Lerer, A., Richardson, A., El-Kishky, A., Low, A., Helyar, A., Madry, A., et al. (2024) · arXiv · Cited by 50 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…model (LLM) reasoning have demonstrated that long chain-of-thought (long-CoT) reasoning, where models engage in extended, reflective thinking processes before arriving at answers, can substantially improve performance on complex reasoning tasks [Jaech et al., 2024, Guo et al., 2025, Team, 2024].”
Rethinking On-Policy Self-Distillation for Thinking Models
Kaur, S., Ri, N., He, Y.-H., et al. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.05184 · Cited by 46
Luo, Y., Song, Y., Zhang, X.-Y., et al. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.16385 · Cited by 43 · cited 1×
“…long-CoT traces [Muennighoff et al., 2025, Ye et al., 2025, Xu et al., 2025, Wen et al., 2025], structured decomposition of reasoning chains [Luo et al., 2025b, Chen et al., 2025b], data-efficient frameworks [Wu et al., 2025], progressive training through the “valley” of capability [Luo et…”
Self-citationR1-Compress: Long Chain-of-Thought Compression via Chunk Compression and Search
Wang, Y.-B., Luo, H., Shen, L., et al. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.16838 · Cited by 34
Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameters
Snell, C., Lee, J., Xu, K., & Kumar, A. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2408.03314 · Cited by 27 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Models such as OpenAI o1 [Jaech et al., 2024], DeepSeek-R1 [Guo et al., 2025], and QwQ [Team, 2024] have shown that scaling test-time compute through longer reasoning chains can be more effective than scaling model parameters [Snell et al., 2024].”
Chen, X., Zhou, S.-H., Liang, K., Sun, X., & Liu, X.-W. (2025) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.18642 · Cited by 24 · cited 1×
“…structured decomposition of reasoning chains [Luo et al., 2025b, Chen et al., 2025b], data-efficient frameworks [Wu et al., 2025], progressive training through the “valley” of capability [Luo et al., 2025a], chunk-wise distillation [Chen et al., 2025a], and long-CoT compression [Wang et al., 2025].”
Feature Extraction and Steering for Enhanced Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Language Models
Li, Z., Wang, X., Yang, Y., et al. (2025) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.15634 · Cited by 18 · cited 5×
“A key characteristic of long-CoT models is their use of epistemic markers, such as “ Wait ”, “ Perhaps ”, and “ Let me reconsider ”, that externalize uncertainty and enable reflective deliberation [Gandhi et al., 2024, Li et al., 2025].”
InfluentialDistribution-Aligned Sequence Distillation for Superior Long-CoT Reasoning
Yan, S., Liu, K., Shen, C., et al. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.09088 · Cited by 17 · cited 1×
“We use two training datasets with reference solutions as privileged information: DASD-10K , a 10K-sample subset from DASD [Yan et al., 2026], and Math-CoT-20K [Ren et al., 2026], a 20K-sample collection of competition-level math problems with detailed chain-of-thought solutions.”
Self-citationThrough the Valley: Path to Effective Long CoT Training for Small Language Models
Luo, R., Li, J., Huang, C., et al. (2025) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.07712 · Cited by 15 · cited 1×
“…structured decomposition of reasoning chains [Luo et al., 2025b, Chen et al., 2025b], data-efficient frameworks [Wu et al., 2025], progressive training through the “valley” of capability [Luo et al., 2025a], chunk-wise distillation [Chen et al., 2025a], and long-CoT compression [Wang et al., 2025].”
Muennighoff, N., Yang, Z., Shi, W., Li, X. L., Fei-Fei, L., Hajishirzi, H., Zettlemoyer, L., Liang, P., Candès, E., & Hashimoto, T. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.19393 · Cited by 12 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Supervised approaches include fine-tuning on curated long-CoT traces [Muennighoff et al., 2025, Ye et al., 2025, Xu et al., 2025, Wen et al., 2025], structured decomposition of reasoning chains [Luo et al., 2025b, Chen et al., 2025b], data-efficient frameworks [Wu et al., 2025], progressive…”
Beyond Scaling Law: A Data-Efficient Distillation Framework for Reasoning
Wu, X., Jiang, X., Li, H., et al. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.09883 · Cited by 12 · cited 1×
“…Xu et al., 2025, Wen et al., 2025], structured decomposition of reasoning chains [Luo et al., 2025b, Chen et al., 2025b], data-efficient frameworks [Wu et al., 2025], progressive training through the “valley” of capability [Luo et al., 2025a], chunk-wise distillation [Chen et al., 2025a], and…”
A Brief Overview: On-Policy Self-Distillation In Large Language Models
Cui, F.-M., Li, S., & Li, J. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.18141 · Cited by 7 · cited 3×
“2 Revisiting On-Policy Self-Distillation for Long-CoT Models On-Policy Self-Distillation (OPSD) [Agarwal et al., 2024, He et al., 2026, Zhao et al., 2026, Cui et al., 2026] has shown promise for improving reasoning capabilities through privileged teacher guidance.”
LIMO: Less is More for Reasoning
Ye, Y., Huang, Z., Xiao, Y., Chern, E., Xia, S., & Liu, P. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.03387 · Cited by 4 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Supervised approaches include fine-tuning on curated long-CoT traces [Muennighoff et al., 2025, Ye et al., 2025, Xu et al., 2025, Wen et al., 2025], structured decomposition of reasoning chains [Luo et al., 2025b, Chen et al., 2025b], data-efficient frameworks [Wu et al., 2025], progressive…”
Distilling System 2 into System 1
Yu, P., Xu, J., Weston, J., & Kulikov, I. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.06023 · Cited by 2 · cited 1×
“…et al., 2024] extends this paradigm by having the student generate its own trajectories and receive token-level feedback from a privileged teacher with access to reference solutions, directly addressing the distribution mismatch problem inherent in off-policy distillation [Yu et al., 2024].”
Stream of Search (SoS): Learning to Search in LanguagePreprint
Gandhi, K., Lee, D. T., Grand, G., et al. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.03683 · Cited by 2 · cited 3× · see citing works
“They indicate uncertainty externalization and reflective reasoning, which are central to long-CoT models’ generalization ability [Gandhi et al., 2024, Li et al., 2025].”
InfluentialRedStar: Does Scaling Long-CoT Data Unlock Better Slow-Reasoning Systems?Preprint
Xu, H., Wu, X., Wang, W., Li, Z., Zheng, D., Chen, B., Hu, Y., Kang, S., Ji, J., Zhang, Y., et al. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.11284 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
6 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Privileged Solutions or Context-Induced Teacher Behavior? Dissecting On-Policy Self-Distillation
Ichihara, Y., Iwase, N., Quamar, M. A., et al. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.09228 · Cited by 14
“Purified OPSD decomposes the teacher distribution into a reference-induced component and a question-conditioned component intended to remain useful at inference time, and suppresses the former using an additional reference-only teacher (Shen et al., 2026).”
Rethinking Privileged Information in On-Policy Self-Distillation
Shrestha, S., & Tessier, A. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.18271 · Cited by 8
“The central premise of OPSD is that privileged reference information improves the teacher’s super-vision and transfers useful information to the student (Zhao et al., 2026a).”
InfluentialDASH: Divergence-Adaptive Supervision Horizons for On-Policy Self-Distillation of Reasoning Models
Hou, Z.-Y., Tang, X.-Y., An, H., et al. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.06243 · Cited by 7
“Recent OPSD methods refine either privileged super-vision or token weighting (Jin et al. 2026; Li et al. 2026; Xie et al. 2026; Lin, Chen, and Zhang 2026; Shen et al. 2026; Liu et al. 2026b).”
Agentic Reinforcement Learning with Observation-Calibrated Self-Distillation
Yang, Y., Qin, C., Liu, X., et al. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.04788 · Cited by 7
“Purified OPSD uses a reference-only view to control reference-specific shortcuts (Shen et al. 2026), while AR-OPD introduces a partially privileged anchor to constrain hindsight guidance that is difficult for the current policy to reach (Zhang 2026).”
Nguyen, X.-P., Liu, Z., Li, Y., et al. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.09263 · Cited by 5
“Ichihara et al. (2026), meanwhile, find that a worked solution, even a deliberately corrupted one, from another problem can retain much of the OPSD gain, showing that the problem’s own solution is not always necessary and that whatever the teacher transfers is not target-specific correctness.”
InfluentialYang, Y.-K., Hao, Z.-Z., Zhang, H., et al. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.08176 · Cited by 5
“…shortcuts into the supervision signal, and reduces the effective PI reach through mechanisms such as adaptive solution masking, learned exposure schedules, anchored residual application, and reference-signal subtraction (Tan and Hong 2026; Han et al. 2026; Zhang 2026; Shen et al. 2026).”
Diagnosing and Mitigating Thinking Collapse in On-Policy Self-Distillation
Peng, K.-Q., Li, C., Ouyang, Y., et al. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.10805 · Cited by 5
“While highly relevant, our approach differs fundamentally in mechanism: whereas Purified OPSD relies on teacher-side target reconstruction across all tokens, AD-OPSD operates directly on the student side.”
What Does Privileged Information Add to On-Policy Self-Distillation?
Zhang, X., Chow, W., Fang, J.-F., et al. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.20612 · Cited by 3
“Complementary methods revise token targets, hidden-state supervision, or the teacher itself (Shen et al., 2026; Li et al., 2026c; Feng et al., 2026; Sun et al., 2026).”
Learning When to Trust via Selective Context Preference Optimization
Sun, X.-S., Chow, W., Wang, Y.-S., et al. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.06377 · Cited by 3
“OPSD is an on-policy diagnostic-teacher baseline in the OPD/OPSD family (Song and Zheng, 2026; Zhao et al., 2026; Shen et al., 2026; Zhou et al., 2026), evaluated as a baseline rather than as part of SCOPE.”
InfluentialDAPD: Dual-Anchored Policy Distillation
Wu, J.-Y., Wang, Y.-Z., Su, E.-C., et al. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.01735 · Cited by 2
Overcoming Scaling Limits in On-Policy Self-Distillation for LLM Reasoning
Hossain, M. I., Kousar, H., & Tourni, I. C. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.37915 · Cited by 1
“Shen et al. (2026) decompose the teacher signal into reference-induced and question-conditioned components to purify long-chain reasoning super-vision, and Ichihara et al. (2026) show that a solution to a different problem can still improve the student.”
Activation-Conditioned Self-Distillation
Lu, Z.-X., Chaudhury, S., Pedapati, T., et al. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.38342 · Cited by 1
“Other variants control reference exposure, learn soft prompts, or remove reference-induced log-probability terms (Han et al., 2026; Ma et al., 2026; Shen et al., 2026).”
VISTA: Verifier-Informed Student-to-Teacher Adaptation for On-Policy Self-Distillation
Ding, Z.-W., Wu, Z.-Z., Tao, Z., et al. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.28306 · Cited by 1
“” Training toward such targets can lead the problem-only student to mention a reference it never observes at inference (Yang et al. 2026; Shen et al. 2026b).”
Recursive Self-Improvement in AI: From Bounded Self-Refinement to Autonomous Research Loops
Chen, M., Wang, L., & Qu, B. (2026) · arXiv
“…equally well-documented, and they rhyme with §3’s. Purified OPSD shows the vanilla recipe consistently fails on long-CoT reasoning models , destabilizing the very reflective behaviors it is meant to strengthen [110]; the privileged teacher’s dense supervision can overfit in-domain patterns [111].”
Asynchronous On-Policy Self-Distillation
Wu, X.-D., Qi, Q., Ji, Y.-Q., et al. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.25880
“Recent work examines reference-induced shortcuts (Shen et al., 2026), reasoning degradation (Kaur et al., 2026), reduced output diversity (Nicolicioiu et al., 2026), and sensitivity to reasoning modes and teacher prefixes (Li et al., 2026b) in OPSD.”
A Stronger Teacher Within: Strengthening MoE Models via On-Policy Bidirectional Distillation
Chen, H.-Y., Bai, J., Liu, Y., et al. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.23185
“To avoid this external dependency, OPSD leverages privileged information to act as its own teacher, distilling a model to itself without increasing inference cost (Zhao et al., 2026a,b; Shen et al., 2026).”
InfluentialSelf-citationCompatibility Matters: A Framework for Token-Level Teacher Selection in On-Policy Distillation
Wei, S., Woo, J., Ozkara, K., et al. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.21234
“…of work in the direction of OPD is on-policy self-distillation (OPSD), which removes the separate teacher by conditioning the same model on privileged context such as a reference solution [Zhao et al., 2026], with unsupervised [Li et al., 2026c] and shortcut-purified [Shen et al., 2026] variants.”
Learning from Interaction Experience via Localized Context Distillation
Hao, Z.-Z., Yang, Y.-K., Xia, X.-L.-Z.-Y.-X., et al. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.21427
MedEvo: Medical Reasoning Evolution through Knowledge Navigation
Wang, X.-L., Chen, Z., Zheng, C.-Y., et al. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.17690
Self-Distillation with Verbal Regularization
Li, J., Li, Y., Lu, J.-R., et al. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.16354
“To mitigate this bias, Purified OPSD (Shen et al., 2026b) filters reference-driven shortcuts from training targets by comparing teacher predictions with and without the question.”
Self-citationDistilling Routed 3D Privilege for Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models
Li, H.-X., Li, Y.-X., Li, D.-M., et al. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.12355
“Recent studies examine the stability and refinement of this supervision (Kim and Lee 2026; Shen et al. 2026; Kaur et al. 2026), while multimodal variants use privileged crops, zoomed views, or visual-thought traces (Yuan et al. 2026; Cai et al. 2026; Li et al. 2026).”
Off-Policy Merging Beats On-Policy Self-Distillation for Continual Learning
Wu, C., Zhang, T. T., & Raghunathan, A. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.05872
“Recent work responds to these failures by filtering the part of the teacher signal that does not transfer to the student (Shen et al., 2026) or by routing token-level supervision between privileged teacher and student policies (Yu et al., 2026).”
Outcome-Guided On-Policy Self-Distillation
Wang, Z.-X., Luo, M.-L., Hong, Y.-K., et al. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.05070
Self-citationE$^2$-OPSD: Taming Entropy Overshoot in On-Policy Self-Distillation
Liu, Y.-F., Fang, M.-H., Gu, X.-Y., et al. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.05048
“…control to outcome rewards (Yang et al., 2026; Ke et al., 2026; He et al., 2026), effectively reintroducing RLVR. Signal-purification methods cancel privileged bias with an additional teacher pass (Pan et al., 2026; Shen et al., 2026), paying extra compute after the bias is already introduced.”
The Missing Primitive: Diagnosing and Repairing Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models
Xing, S., Dai, Z.-L., Qian, C.-Y., et al. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.02191
“To address this, Shen et al. (2026) isolate inference-transferable supervision from reference-induced shortcuts, while Kaur et al. (2026); Peng et al. (2026) focus on preserving high-entropy decision points and epistemic behaviors from aggressive privileged-teacher corrections.”
Better Supervision Is Nearby: Neighborhood On-Policy Self-Distillation
Wei, X., Ding, Y.-F., Li, Y. Y., et al. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.39687
PreSO: Privileged Representation Isolation for On-Policy Self-Distillation
Yang, Y.-H., Xia, M.-X., Ye, C.-N., et al. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.14001
“Other approaches selectively correct the teacher signal to reduce style-or reference-dependent effects (Pan et al., 2026; Yang et al., 2026c; Shen et al., 2026).”
Self-citationMM-OPD: Towards One More Bottleneck Between Perception and Reasoning
Tong, J.-T., Lou, Y., Shen, Z.-M., Gu, J.-Q., Fan, L.-B., Li, R.-X., Wu, Y., Ye, J.-P., & Zou, Y.-X. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.32690
“Purified OPSD discounts reference-induced preferences and applies the remaining question-conditioned correction to a clean base prediction (Shen et al., 2026).”
Self-citationPSD: Pseudo Self-Distillation of Memory Representation Capabilities for LLM Agents
Suhail, P., Xia, M.-L., Zhang, X.-C., et al. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.23449
“Building on this framework, Purified OPSD decomposes the privileged teacher’s signal into a reference-induced component and a genuinely transferable, question-conditioned reasoning component, distilling only the latter via a PMI-based reconstruction [21].”
Aha-Flow Distillation: Flow Markers Matter in LLM Reasoning
Wang, X.-D., & Peng, P.-X. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.07036
“Following OPSD, we use Jensen–Shannon divergence (JSD) and clip the per-token divergence with a threshold δ clip to prevent a small number of tokens from dominating the update (Shen et al., 2026).”
One Symptom, Three Levers: A Critical Review of On-Policy Self-Distillation
Robert, J., & Qader, R. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.25936
“What transfers best is intermediate abstraction, meaning hints, plans and error-aligned critiques, which convey a skill without entailing the answer.”
- Authors
- Shen, Z., Tong, J., Yan, S., Shen, C., Chen, H., Ye, W., Hu, X., Miao, R., Wang, H., Zhao, J., Chen, G., & Ye, J.
- Affiliations
- Alibaba Group (Cayman Islands) (KY)
- Zhejiang University (CN)
- Jilin University (CN)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2026
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2607.02234
- OpenAlex
- W7167214743
- Semantic Scholar
- 13b352683a5c64110b029044c4064bf7ec227cc2
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 36
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- on-policy self-distillation, large language model reasoning, teacher-student distillation, rote learning, pointwise mutual information, reflective thinking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review