Remember When It Matters: Proactive Memory Agent for Long-Horizon Agents

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

Existing memory systems typically emphasize storing, updating, and retrieving relevant records, which is crucial for personalization, persistent user state, and cross-session recall.

“Existing memory systems typically emphasize storing, updating, and retrieving relevant records (Packer et al., 2023;Zhong et al., 2024;Park et al., 2023;Mem0 Team, 2026), which is crucial for personalization, persistent user state, and cross-session recall.”

• cites Packer et al., 2023 sourceSupported
• cites Zhong et al., 2024 sourceSupported
• cites Park et al., 2023Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

SETA is a collection of executable terminal-agent tasks with verifier rewards.

“We train on SETA, a collection of executable terminal-agent tasks with verifier rewards (Shen et al., 2026).”

• cites Shen et al., 2026 sourceSupported

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

Advisor-style systems use an auxiliary model that observes the trajectory and provides natural language guidance to an executor.

“This is analogous to advisor-style systems, where an auxiliary model observes the trajectory and provides naturallanguage guidance to an executor (Asawa et al., 2025;Anthropic, 2026).”

• cites Asawa et al., 2025 sourceSupported
• cites Anthropic, 2026Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

May combine two claims.

Long context windows do not by themselves guarantee reliable use of prior information: models can underutilize information depending on its position in the context.

“Long context windows do not by themselves guarantee reliable use of prior information: models can underutilize information depending on its position in the context (Liu et al., 2024).”

• cites Liu et al., 2024 sourceSupported

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

The memory agent is more constrained than advisor-style methods: it is not intended to provide broad strategic advice or perform general deliberation.

“Our memory agent is related to these supervisory approaches, but is more constrained: it is not intended to provide broad strategic advice or perform general deliberation.”

• cites Asawa et al., 2025 sourceSupported
• cites Anthropic, 2026Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

May combine two claims.

The memory policy is learnable but requires calibration.

“Table 4a shows that the memory policy is learnable but requires calibration.”

May combine two claims.

Memory intervention improves the stronger action agent Opus 4.6 by +2.4 pp on Terminal-Bench and +2.5 pp on τ 2 -Bench.

“the gain does not vanish for a stronger action agent: Opus 4.6 still gains +2.4 pp and +2.5 pp respectively.”

May combine two claims.

On Terminal-Bench 2.0, memory intervention improves pass@1 for Sonnet 4.5 by +8.3 pp (37.6% to 45.9%) and for Opus 4.6 by +2.4 pp (43.5% to 45.9%).

“on Terminal-Bench 2.0, Sonnet 4.5 gains +8.3 pp (37.6% → 45.9%) and Opus 4.6 gains +2.4 pp (43.5% → 45.9%)”

May combine two claims.

The type of execution state that memory reactivates differs by benchmark: Terminal-Bench emphasizes environment observations, debugging continuity, and failure diagnoses, while τ2-Bench emphasizes policy clauses, user/tool state, and procedural sequencing.

“The type of state differs by benchmark: Terminal-Bench emphasizes environment observations, debugging continuity, and failure diagnoses, while τ 2 -Bench emphasizes policy clauses, user/tool state, and procedural sequencing.”

May combine two claims.

Memory intervention improves pass@1 on both Terminal-Bench 2.0 and τ2-Bench across both Sonnet 4.5 and Opus 4.6 action agents.

“Memory intervention improves pass@1 on both benchmarks and across both action-agent strengths: on Terminal-Bench 2.0, Sonnet 4.5 gains +8.3 pp (37.6% → 45.9%) and Opus 4.6 gains +2.4 pp (43.5% → 45.9%); on τ 2 -Bench, Sonnet 4.5 gains +6.8 pp on the task-weighted average (55.0%→ 61.8%) and Opus 4.6 gains +2.5 pp (66.2% → 68.7%).”

May combine two claims.

Always inject is competitive and slightly leads on micro-average by 0.3 points, but this gap is within expected run variance and disappears on the domain-balanced macro-average, where selective silence is better, especially on airline.

“Always inject is competitive and slightly leads on micro-average by 0.3 points, but this gap is within expected run variance and disappears on the domain-balanced macroaverage, where selective silence is better, especially on airline.”

May combine two claims.

SFT recovers the loss from an untrained 27B memory agent and improves SETA reward to 0.720, while GRPO further raises it to 0.734.

“SFT recovers this loss and improves reward to 0.720, while GRPO further raises it to 0.734.”

May combine two claims.

On τ2-Bench, memory-style variants generally improve over the Sonnet baseline, but the improvements are not equally robust across domains.

“Table 2 shows that memory-style variants generally improve over the Sonnet baseline, but the improvements are not equally robust across domains.”

May combine two claims.

In one airline case, the user claimed Gold status but tool output showed the user was a Regular member; the baseline issued compensation based on the user's claim, while the memory-enabled agent reminded the action agent to rely on verified records.

“For example, in one airline case, the user claimed Gold status, but tool output showed that the user was a Regular member.The baseline issued compensation based on the user's claim, while the memory-enabled agent reminded the action agent to rely on verified records.”

May combine two claims.

Ablations show that selective intervention outperforms passive bank exposure, always-on injection, advisor-only guidance, and general retrieval.

“Ablations show that selective intervention outperforms passive bank exposure, always-on injection, advisor-only guidance, and general retrieval.”

• Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · plain

  “Ablations show that our proactive intervention beats passive memory exposure and general memory retrieval.”

May combine two claims.

Injection-only guidance helps in some domains, especially telecom, but is less stable without persistent memory and even hurts airline relative to the baseline.

“Injection-only guidance helps in some domains, especially telecom, but is less stable without persistent memory and even hurts airline relative to the baseline.”

May combine two claims.

The full two-phase memory agent achieves the highest macro-average on τ2-Bench, improving all three domains and giving the largest gain on airline.

“The full two-phase memory agent achieves the highest macro-average, improving all three domains and giving the largest gain on airline.”

May combine two claims.

Mem0 improves the average score on τ2-Bench, confirming that persistent memory retrieval is useful, but it does not improve airline over the baseline and falls short of the full system on macro-average.

“Mem0 improves the average score, confirming that persistent memory retrieval is useful.However, it does not improve airline over the baseline and falls short of our full system on macro-average.”

May combine two claims.

On τ2-Bench, memory intervention improves pass@1 for Sonnet 4.5 by +6.8 pp on the task-weighted average (55.0% to 61.8%) and for Opus 4.6 by +2.5 pp (66.2% to 68.7%).

“on τ 2 -Bench, Sonnet 4.5 gains +6.8 pp on the task-weighted average (55.0%→ 61.8%) and Opus 4.6 gains +2.5 pp (66.2% → 68.7%)”

May combine two claims.

Occasionally, the memory agent surfaces a speculative inference with too much confidence, repeats information the action agent already knows, or raises a plausible but unnecessary concern that causes extra verification.

“Occasionally, the memory agent surfaces a speculative inference with too much confidence, repeats information that the action agent already knows, or raises a plausible but unnecessary concern that causes extra verification.”

May combine two claims.

Full-bank context improves over the baseline but trails the full system by 2.8 macro points and 2.6 micro points on τ2-Bench.

“Full-bank context improves over the baseline but trails the full system by 2.8 macro points and 2.6 micro points, suggesting that maintaining a memory bank is useful but exposing all remembered state is not enough; the memory agent must select what is currently behaviorally relevant.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

Terminal-Bench 2.0 results are reported on the 85 paired tasks for which both baseline and memory runs produced valid evaluations, excluding four docker failures.

“The benchmark contains 89 tasks; we report results on the 85 paired tasks for which both baseline and memory runs produced valid evaluations, excluding four docker failures unrelated to agent behavior.”

• AssumptionRests on an assumption: The four docker failures excluded from Terminal-Bench analysis are unrelated to agent behavior.

May combine two claims.

Training on SETA shows that the intervention policy is learnable: SFT teaches memory management, while RL improves when remembered state should re-enter the control loop.

“Training on SETA further shows that this intervention policy is learnable: SFT teaches memory management, while RL improves when remembered state should re-enter the control loop.”

May combine two claims.

The prompted Opus memory agent improves long-horizon agents, but it adds a frontier-model call at each memory step and its intervention calibration is imperfect.

“The prompted Opus memory agent improves long-horizon agents, but it adds a frontier-model call at each memory step and its intervention calibration is imperfect.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

τ2-Bench evaluation uses the base task split with 50 airline tasks, 114 retail tasks, and 114 telecom tasks, totaling 278 tasks per configuration.

“We use the base task split, containing 50 airline tasks, 114 retail tasks, and 114 telecom tasks, for a total of 278 tasks per configuration.”

May combine two claims.

Successful memory interventions are specific, grounded, and timely; they restore the causal influence of execution state over the next action.

“Successful interventions are specific, grounded, and timely; they restore the causal influence of execution state over the next action.”

May combine two claims.

The ablations support the two-phase design: agentic memory management alone is helpful but insufficient; advisor-like intervention without memory is not reliably grounded; and always-on injection can be competitive but less balanced.

“Overall, the ablations support the two-phase design.Agentic memory management alone is helpful but insufficient; advisor-like intervention without memory is not reliably grounded; and always-on injection can be competitive but less balanced.”

May combine two claims.

The full memory agent performs best on macro-average because it combines maintained execution state with a selective intervention policy that can choose both what to say and when to remain silent.

“The full memory agent performs best on macro-average because it combines maintained execution state with a selective intervention policy that can choose both what to say and when to remain silent.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

The memory agent must decide not only what execution state to retain, but also when remembered state is useful enough to enter the action loop.

“The memory agent must decide not only what execution state to retain, but also when remembered state is useful enough to enter the action loop.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

The action agent is kept unchanged across baseline and memory-enabled runs.

“The action agent is kept unchanged across baseline and memory-enabled runs.”

May combine two claims.

Surfacing too much memory adds latency, consumes tokens, and can distract the agent from local progress.

“Surfacing too little memory lets the agent repeat mistakes or ignore prior discoveries; surfacing too much adds latency, consumes tokens, and can distract the agent from local progress.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

The memory intervention module is plug-and-play with frontier action agents and existing agent harnesses.

“The module is plug-and-play with frontier action agents and existing agent harnesses.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

Embedding-based retrieval-augmented prompting retrieves fixed records from a store.

“Unlike embedding-based retrieval-augmented prompting, which retrieves fixed records from a store (Lewis et al., 2020), this variant still uses the memory model to synthesize a reminder from the maintained bank.”

• cites Lewis et al., 2020Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

In Terminal-Bench, execution state decays through local debugging loops: agents may forget earlier requirements, repeat failed commands, overlook environment observations, or lose track of diagnosed errors.

“In this setting, execution state decays through local debugging loops: agents may forget earlier requirements, repeat failed commands, overlook environment observations, or lose track of diagnosed errors.”

May combine two claims.

A general memory layer can return relevant records, but it does not explicitly model when a memory should enter the loop or how it should be phrased as a targeted reminder.

“A general memory layer can return relevant records, but it does not explicitly model when a memory should enter the loop or how it should be phrased as a targeted reminder.”

May combine two claims.

Maintaining a memory bank is useful, but exposing all remembered state is not enough; the memory agent must select what is currently behaviorally relevant.

“Full-bank context improves over the baseline but trails the full system by 2.8 macro points and 2.6 micro points, suggesting that maintaining a memory bank is useful but exposing all remembered state is not enough; the memory agent must select what is currently behaviorally relevant.”

May combine two claims.

Memory intervention can be distilled into an open-weight model, and RL improves the decision of when remembered state should enter the control loop.

“These results suggest that memory intervention can be distilled into an open-weight model and that RL improves the decision of when remembered state should enter the control loop.”

May combine two claims.

Long-horizon tasks vary in their failure modes, so a fixed summarization policy cannot know whether a memory should interrupt the next action.

“Long-horizon tasks vary in their failure modes-in some, the useful memory is a hard requirement from the initial instruction; in others, an environment fact, a failed command, a bug diagnosis, or an unfinished subgoal-so a fixed summarization policy cannot know whether a memory should interrupt the next action.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

Unnecessary interventions can be harmful rather than merely redundant.

“unnecessary interventions can be harmful rather than merely redundant.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

Imitation alone does not optimize the downstream effect of memory interventions.

“Because imitation alone does not optimize the downstream effect of memory interventions, we further calibrate the memory agent with reinforcement learning.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

Mem0 is a general persistent memory layer.

“Mem0 compares against a general persistent memory layer (Mem0 Team, 2026).”

• cites Mem0 Team, 2026Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

Prompted memory agents add additional inference cost and their intervention decisions may be imperfectly calibrated.

“However, prompted memory agents are not necessarily the most practical deployment setting: they add additional inference cost, and their intervention decisions may be imperfectly calibrated.”

May combine two claims.

Memory intervention gains are larger for the weaker action agent but persist for the stronger one, indicating that the benefit is not merely compensating for limited capacity.

“Gains are larger for the weaker action agent but do not disappear for the stronger one, indicating that the benefit is not merely compensating for limited capacity.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

Tasks differ substantially in environment dynamics, observability, and failure modes, so intervention calibration is required rather than a fixed summarization policy.

“Because tasks differ substantially in environment dynamics, observability, and failure modes, this requires intervention calibration rather than a fixed summarization policy.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

In τ 2 -Bench, important facts may be stated by the user, observed through tools, or implied by domain policies, but later stop influencing the agent's decisions.

“This creates a different source of behavioral state decay: important facts may be stated by the user, observed through tools, or implied by domain policies, but later stop influencing the agent's decisions.”