PreprintCited by 0Topic ModelingNatural Language Processing TechniquesArtificial Intelligence Applications

Nanbeige4.2-3B: Unlocking Agentic Capabilities in a Compact Model

Open access
Lab, Nanbeige, :, Yang, Chen, Huang, Chengrui, Lan, Fufeng, Chen, Hanhui, Zhou, Hao, Song, Huatong +18 more·2026·arXiv

Abstract

We present Nanbeige4.2-3B, a compact general agentic model with 3B non-embedding parameters. It delivers strong performance across code-agent, office-agent, and complex tool-use tasks while maintaining highly competitive reasoning capabilities in mathematics, coding, and science. Nanbeige4.2-3B is pretrained from scratch on 28T tokens with a Looped Transformer that reuses the layer stack to increase capacity without adding parameters. For SFT data and trajectory construction, we expand the diversity of executable environments, task assets, and agentic scaffolds through real-world deployment and large-scale synthesis. Our RL pipeline applies mixed-mode RLHF over Think and Non-Think responses to improve overall model quality and reduce failure cases, length-controlled reasoning RL to balance accuracy and reasoning efficiency, and agentic RL with outcome and process rewards to stabilize long-horizon training. Extensive evaluations show that Nanbeige4.2-3B outperforms larger models, including Qwen3.5-9B and Gemma4-12B, across diverse agentic benchmarks while remaining competitive on reasoning and alignment tasks. Performance with OpenClaw further supports its use as a compact local personal assistant.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

Nanbeige4.2-3B is a 3B non-embedding-parameter compact agentic model pretrained from scratch on 28T tokens with a Looped Transformer and post-trained via SFT plus multi-stage RL. It reports best results on all general-agent and code-agent benchmarks among compared models, outperforming larger Qwen3.5-9B and Gemma4-12B while remaining competitive on reasoning and alignment.

Key findings

  • Pretraining with a two-pass Looped Transformer from scratch on 28T tokens yields a base model that improves over Nanbeige4-3B-Base and beats Qwen3.5-4B-Base and Gemma4-E4B-Base on GSM8K 92.7, BBH 81.6, MBPP 67.6, MMLU-Pro 63.8, SuperGPQA 35.2, and GPQA 53.3 (Table 1).
  • Nanbeige4.2-3B achieves the best reported results on all general-agent and code-agent benchmarks in Table 3: GDPval Rubrics 74.3, AgentIF-Oneday 67.5, OfficeQA-Pro 21.1, PinchBench-V2 74.7, ClawGym 65.0, Claw-Eval Pass^3 52.2, MCP-Atlas 57.8, SWE-Bench Verified 63.6, SWE-Bench Pro 46.9, and Terminal-Bench 2.0 44.1, outperforming Qwen3.5-9B and Gemma4-12B.
  • It is best on five of six reasoning benchmarks, including HLE 17.8, SciCode 35.6, GPQA Diamond 87.4, HMMT-Feb-2026 82.8, IMO-Answer-Bench 67.3, and LiveCodeBench-V6 72.5; alignment scores are AA-LCR 58.7, IF-Bench 54.6, and Recruit-Bench 63.3, with Gemma4-12B better on IF-Bench 73.5 and Recruit-Bench 69.4.
  • The RL pipeline improves accuracy while reducing bad-case rate and output length: for PinchBench-V2, accuracy goes 55.89 → 71.14 → 75.49, bad-case rate 5.44 → 8.16 → 2.72, and average length 20,515 → 13,098 → 11,808 tokens. Agentic RL reduces normalized action error by approximately 20% and improves overall score from 66.0 to a peak of 71.0. Under OpenClaw, it outperforms Qwen3.5-4B and Qwen3.5-9B on all six local-assistant benchmarks, e.g., GDPval 68.8 vs 37.0/38.0 and AgentIF-Oneday 58.9 vs 27.0/32.1.

Methods

  • Pretraining: Looped Transformer with two passes through the shared layer stack, trained from scratch on 28T tokens; the data mixture increases sampling weights for mathematics, code, and synthetic QA, and includes a small proportion of agentic trajectory data.
  • Post-training: three-stage SFT curriculum extending context from 64K to 128K to 256K tokens, with target-token mixtures of 82.7% STEM / 11.6% general / 5.7% agentic at 64K, 47.8% / 22.7% / 29.5% at 128K, and 22.4% STEM / 8.7% general / 68.9% agentic at 256K; turn-level loss masking excludes unreliable turns from loss while retaining them in context. Data synthesis covers repository-to-trajectory software engineering, hybrid real-simulated tool-use environments, and artifact-centric office tasks, using multiple scaffolds including Claude Code, OpenHands, SWE-agent, and Codex-based drivers.
  • RL and evaluation: two-stage RLHF over Think and Non-Think responses; length-controlled reasoning RL using offline median-length budgets and a difficulty-aware penalty; agentic RL with outcome and process rewards from action-centric rubrics, restricted to relatively easy tasks with short trajectories and higher pass@8. Evaluation spans general-agent, code-agent, reasoning, and alignment benchmarks, plus OpenClaw local-assistant scenarios.

Limitations

  • The paper states future work rather than a formal limitations section: scaling the diversity, quality, and coverage of agentic data remains important; improving capacity and efficiency under constrained computation; exploring loop-layer organization, cross-depth information reuse, n-gram external memory, and linear/sparse attention; scaling post-training along task difficulty, environment diversity, and trajectory quality; and studying how agentic capabilities can be established earlier in pretraining. It also states that agentic RL is restricted to relatively easy, short-trajectory tasks.
  • Evident from the text: evaluation relies on in-house harnesses and judge models (e.g., DeepSeek-V4-Pro, GLM-5.1, Qwen3.7-Plus) and an in-house Recruit-Bench, and Table 3 omits AgentIF-Oneday entries for Gemma4-E4B and Gemma4-12B, so some cross-model comparisons are incomplete.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2607.22083

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 11 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    The resulting model shows a broad agentic capability profile at its scale.

    “The resulting model shows a broad agentic capability profile at its scale.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingcitation

    Nanbeige4.2-3B adopts a Looped Transformer rather than scaling parameters.

    “Rather than scaling parameters, Nanbeige4.2-3Badopts a Looped Transformer [2].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [2]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Findingown data

    Training the looped architecture from scratch performs significantly better than converting a pretrained standard transformer into a looped architecture through upcycling.

    “In our experiments, the from-scratch approach performs significantly better, suggesting that the model benefits from adapting representations to repeated layer reuse throughout pre-training rather than introducing the loop only after a model has already been trained.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingnone given

    Pretraining with the looped architecture from scratch on 28T tokens, with an expanded corpus and a refined data mixture, yields a strong base model.

    “Pretraining with this looped architecture from scratch on 28T tokens, with an expanded corpus and a refined data mixture, yields a strong base model.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingcitation

    Nanbeige4.2-3B adopts a Looped Transformer architecture to improve effective depth and reasoning capacity under a fixed parameter budget.

    “To improve the effective depth and reasoning capacity under a fixed parameter budget, Nanbeige4.2-3Badopts a Looped Transformer architecture [2].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [2]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims. 35
  • Borderline: one of the tests for a substantial claim is unclear. 1
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 10
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    When deployed within a general agent framework such as OpenClaw, Nanbeige4.2-3B performs well on daily assistance, office workflows, and deep research, supporting its use as a compact local assistant.

    “When deployed within a general agent framework such as OpenClaw [23], it performs well on daily assistance, office workflows, and deep research, further supporting its use as a compact local assistant.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [23]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Nanbeige4.2-3B delivers strong performance across code-agent, office-agent, and complex tool-use tasks while maintaining highly competitive reasoning capabilities in mathematics, coding, and science.

    “It delivers strong performance across code-agent, officeagent, and complex tool-use tasks while maintaining highly competitive reasoning capabilities in mathematics, coding, and science.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Nanbeige4.2-3B is a compact general agentic model with 3B nonembedding parameters.

    “We present Nanbeige4.2-3B,a compact general agentic model with 3B nonembedding parameters.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Nanbeige4.2-3B achieves strong performance on complex tool-use, office-agent, and code-agent benchmarks, outperforming substantially larger Qwen3.5-9B and Gemma4-12B across diverse evaluations.

    “Nanbeige4.2-3Bachieves strong performance on complex tool-use, office-agent, and code-agent benchmarks, outperforming substantially larger Qwen3.5-9B[20] and Gemma4-12B [25] across diverse evaluations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [20]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [25]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Nanbeige4.2-3B is pretrained from scratch on 28T tokens with a Looped Transformer that reuses the layer stack to increase capacity without adding parameters.

    “Nanbeige4.2-3B is pretrained from scratch on 28T tokens with a Looped Transformer that reuses the layer stack to increase capacity without adding parameters.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Extensive evaluations show that Nanbeige4.2-3B outperforms larger models, including Qwen3.5-9B and Gemma4-12B, across diverse agentic benchmarks while remaining competitive on reasoning and alignment tasks.

    “Extensive evaluations show that Nanbeige4.2-3Boutperforms larger models, including Qwen3.5-9B and Gemma4-12B, across diverse agentic benchmarks while remaining competitive on reasoning and alignment tasks.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Nanbeige4.2-3B remains competitive in mathematical, coding, and scientific reasoning, as well as alignment.

    “It also remains competitive in mathematical, coding, and scientific reasoning, as well as alignment.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The repository-level data synthesis pipeline transforms historical GitHub development activities into executable tasks backed by automated environments, while leveraging model failure feedback to co-evolve task distribution alongside agent capabilities.

    “This system transforms historical GitHub development activities into executable tasks backed by automated environments, while leveraging model failure feedback to co-evolve task distribution alongside agent capabilities.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    A two-pass configuration provides the most favorable trade-off in our experiments: relative to a standard Transformer, it retains approximately 75% of the token efficiency and provides a significant capacity gain.

    “A two-pass configuration provides the most favorable trade-off in our experiments: relative to a standard Transformer, it retains approximately 75% of the token efficiency and provides a significant capacity gain.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Across six benchmarks covering mathematical and code reasoning, alignment, software engineering, and agentic task execution, the post-RL checkpoint achieves higher accuracy while using fewer output tokens than the pre-RL checkpoint.

    “As illustrated in Figure 7, among these benchmarks, the post-RL checkpoint achieves higher accuracy while using fewer output tokens.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Borderline on S4 (based): unclear from the text.

    Findingnone given

    The behavioral regularization learned from general-purpose RLHF exhibits strong generalization along two distinct dimensions.

    “A central finding is that the behavioral regularization learned from general-purpose RLHF exhibits strong generalization along two distinct dimensions:”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the 128K stage, the mixture shifts to 47.8% reasoning-oriented STEM data, 22.7% general instruction data, and 29.5% agentic data, providing a transition toward longer-context instruction following, tool use, and multi-turn environment interaction.

    “In the 128K stage, the mixture shifts to 47.8% reasoning-oriented STEM data, 22.7% general instruction data, and 29.5% agentic data, providing a transition toward longer-context instruction following, tool use, and multi-turn environment interaction.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The two-stage RLHF procedure improves task performance while producing shorter and more stable generation trajectories, as shown by three benchmarks (AA-LCR, LiveCodeBench-V6, PinchBench-V2).

    “These three benchmarks consistently show that the two-stage RLHF procedure improves task performance while producing shorter and more stable generation trajectories.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [12]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    After mixed-domain SFT, the compact model still exhibits unstable generation behaviors, including repetitive reasoning, cyclic reflection, delayed termination, duplicated answers, malformed formats, and abnormal continuations.

    “After mixed-domain SFT, the compact model still exhibits unstable generation behaviors, including repetitive reasoning, cyclic reflection, delayed termination, duplicated answers, malformed formats, and abnormal continuations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Nanbeige4.2-3B achieves the best result on five of the six reasoning benchmarks while remaining competitive on alignment tasks.

    “Nanbeige4.2-3B also achieves the best result on five of the six reasoning benchmarks while remaining competitive on alignment tasks.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    With only 3B non-embedding parameters, Nanbeige4.2-3B achieves the best results on all reported general-agent and code-agent benchmarks, outperforming the larger Qwen3.5-9B and Gemma4-12B models.

    “With only 3B non-embedding parameters, Nanbeige4.2-3Bachieves the best results on all reported general-agent and code-agent benchmarks, outperforming the larger Qwen3.5-9B and Gemma4-12B models.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    During agentic RL training, the normalized action error rate decreases by approximately 20%, while the overall score improves from 66.0 to a peak of 71.0.

    “Meanwhile, the normalized action error rate decreases by approximately 20%, while the overall score improves from 66.0 to a peak of 71.0 during training.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Nanbeige4.2-3B-Base consistently improves upon Nanbeige4-3B-Base and performs significantly better than other base models of similar parameter scale (Qwen3.5-4B-Base and Gemma4-E4B-Base).

    “Nanbeige4.2-3B-Baseconsistently improves upon Nanbeige4-3B-Base and performs significantly better than the other base models.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Increasing the number of passes beyond two provides only marginal additional improvement, but substantially slows training and makes optimization less stable.

    “Increasing the number of passes provides only marginal additional improvement, but substantially slows training and makes optimization less stable.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Gemma4-12B performs better on IF-Bench and Recruit-Bench, but Nanbeige4.2-3B provides a stronger overall balance across agentic, reasoning, and alignment evaluations under a substantially smaller parameter budget.

    “Gemma4-12B performs better on IF-Bench and Recruit-Bench, but Nanbeige4.2-3Bprovides a stronger overall balance across agentic, reasoning, and alignment evaluations under a substantially smaller parameter budget.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the 256K stage, 68.9% of supervised target tokens are allocated to agentic data, while retaining 22.4% reasoning-oriented STEM data and 8.7% general instruction data.

    “We allocate 68.9% of the supervised target tokens to agentic data, while retaining 22.4% reasoning-oriented STEM data and 8.7% general instruction data.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    General-purpose RLHF improves not only instruction following but also mathematical reasoning, coding, and agentic performance.

    “General-purpose RLHF improves not only instruction following but also mathematical reasoning, coding, and agentic performance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Sharing the KV cache across loop passes reduces the KV-cache by half but its performance gains are consistently lower than those of the full, non-sharing loop configuration.

    “Although the sharing configuration reduces the KV-cache by half, its performance gains are consistently lower than those of the full, non-sharing loop configuration.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The pre-training corpus comprises 28T tokens, exceeding that of Nanbeige 4.1 in both scale and data quality.

    “Our pre-training corpus comprises 28T tokens, exceeding that of Nanbeige 4.1 in both scale and data quality.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Compact models that combine reasoning and tool use for specific agentic settings, such as deep search, have been investigated.

    “Other studies investigate compact models that combine reasoning and tool use for specific agentic settings, such as deep search [31].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [31]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The Looped Transformer increases effective computational depth and model capacity without introducing another set of parameters.

    “It increases the effective computational depth and model capacity without introducing another set of parameters.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    This provides a solid foundation for subsequent post-training stages.

    “This provides a solid foundation for subsequent post-training stages.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Small language models can achieve strong performance on mathematical reasoning, competitive programming, and other verifiable tasks.

    “Recent work shows that small language models can achieve strong performance on mathematical reasoning, competitive programming, and other verifiable tasks [28,30].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [28]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [30]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The problem-dependent length-control objective for Think-mode RL encourages concise reasoning on reliably solved problems while preserving exploration on difficult ones.

    “The objective combines a fixed length budget with a continuous, difficulty-aware penalty, encouraging concise reasoning on reliably solved problems while preserving exploration on difficult ones.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The gains are consistent across all three task categories and are especially clear on office workflows, indicating that the model's general agentic capabilities transfer well to a unified local-assistant setting.

    “The gains are consistent across all three task categories and are especially clear on office workflows, indicating that the model's general agentic capabilities transfer well to a unified local-assistant setting.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The 256K stage strengthens long-horizon planning, tool invocation, execution feedback utilization, and recovery from intermediate failures.

    “This strengthens long-horizon planning, tool invocation, execution feedback utilization, and recovery from intermediate failures.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    An independent judge agent evaluates the fidelity of each deliverable to the task specification, the consistency of the associated rubric, and the overall quality of the execution trace, retaining only high-quality samples for subsequent synthesis rounds.

    “An independent judge agent then evaluates the fidelity of each deliverable to the task specification, the consistency of the associated rubric, and the overall quality of the execution trace, retaining only high-quality samples for subsequent synthesis rounds.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The compact held-out task suite enables fast and reproducible assessment of whether successive data-synthesis and reinforcement-learning iterations improve tool-use performance before full-scale evaluation.

    “It enables fast and reproducible assessment of whether successive data-synthesis and reinforcement-learning iterations improve tool-use performance before full-scale evaluation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Because the penalty is subtracted rather than gating the task reward, it preserves correctness differences and remains continuous at the budget boundary; for binary rewards, α < 1 guarantees that a correct response is always preferred to an incorrect one regardless of length.

    “Because the penalty is subtracted rather than gating the task reward, it preserves correctness differences and remains continuous at the budget boundary; for binary rewards, α < 1 further guarantees that a correct response is always preferred to an incorrect one regardless of length.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Nanbeige4.2-3B is a compact model that combines broad agentic capabilities with strong reasoning under a 3B non-embedding parameter budget.

    “We present Nanbeige4.2-3B,a compact model that combines broad agentic capabilities with strong reasoning under a 3B non-embedding parameter budget.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Aggregating complementary trajectories from multiple scaffolds yields a training corpus that emphasizes scaffold-invariant reasoning and repair strategies, thereby improving generalization to unseen agent interfaces and tool schemas.

    “Aggregating these complementary trajectories yields a training corpus that emphasizes scaffold-invariant reasoning and repair strategies, rather than scaffold-specific interaction patterns, thereby improving generalization to unseen agent interfaces and tool schemas.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The length penalty is difficulty-aware: responses within budget are never penalized, while the penalty for over-budget responses grows with both the normalized excess length and the problem's current pass rate, so concise reasoning is encouraged on reliably solved problems but not on still-difficult ones.

    “The penalty is thus difficulty-aware: responses within budget are never penalized, while the penalty for over-budget responses grows with both the normalized excess length and the problem's current pass rate, so concise reasoning is encouraged on reliably solved problems but not on still-difficult ones.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    With its small parameter scale, Nanbeige4.2-3B is compact enough for efficient local deployment while retaining strong reasoning and tool-use capabilities.

    “With the small parameter scale, Nanbeige4.2-3B is compact enough for efficient local deployment while retaining strong reasoning and tool-use capabilities.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Combining outcome and action-centric process rewards suppresses recurrent action errors and improves end-task performance.

    “These results show that combining outcome and action-centric process rewards suppresses recurrent action errors and improves end-task performance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The closed-loop artifact recycling process progressively expands the task distribution, enabling the generation of increasingly diverse and complex office workflows.

    “This closed-loop process progressively expands the task distribution, enabling the generation of increasingly diverse and complex office workflows.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Agents must handle specialized office workflows involving reports, slide decks, spreadsheets, and other artifacts—capabilities central to knowledge-worker productivity.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This design supports both customized tool-use scenarios with complex data dependencies and general-purpose tool use requiring real network interaction, balancing environmental diversity with ecological realism.

    “This design supports both customized tool-use scenarios with complex data dependencies and general-purpose tool use requiring real network interaction, balancing environmental diversity with ecological realism.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The process of capability-guided code repository collection preserves diversity across repositories and problem settings while improving coverage of capability areas in which the model exhibits systematic weaknesses.

    “This process preserves diversity across repositories and problem settings while improving coverage of capability areas in which the model exhibits systematic weaknesses.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
42 of 42
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Strong agents must operate across heterogeneous environments, manipulate repositories and office documents, recover from failures, and make progress over long-horizon trajectories.

    “However, strong agents must operate across heterogeneous environments, manipulate repositories and office documents, recover from failures, and make progress over long-horizon trajectories.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Integrating these capabilities into one small model remains challenging.

    “Integrating these capabilities into one small model remains challenging.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Nanbeige4.2-3B is the first open-source model at this scale to demonstrate this combination of code-agent, office-agent, and complex tool-use capabilities while retaining strong general reasoning performance.

    “To the best of our knowledge, Nanbeige4.2-3B is the first open-source model at this scale to demonstrate this combination of code-agent, office-agent, and complex tool-use capabilities while retaining strong general reasoning performance.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Real-world agentic coding demands that models navigate complex repositories, infer intent from ambiguous specifications, localize defect paths, apply coordinated multifile patches, and verify correctness via closed-loop execution.

    “Unlike single-turn code generation, real-world agentic coding demands that models navigate complex repositories, infer intent from ambiguous specifications, localize defect paths, apply coordinated multifile patches, and verify correctness via closed-loop execution.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Agents must handle specialized office workflows involving reports, slide decks, spreadsheets, and other artifacts—capabilities central to knowledge-worker productivity.

    “Beyond foundational tool use, agents must handle specialized office workflows involving reports, slide decks, spreadsheets, and other artifacts—capabilities central to knowledge-worker productivity.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A successful trajectory may still contain incorrect or unproductive intermediate turns.

    “A successful trajectory may still contain incorrect or unproductive intermediate turns.”
6 of 6

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Xeron Du, Yifan Yao, Kaijing Ma, Bingli Wang, Tianyu Zheng, Minghao Liu, Yiming Liang, Xiaolong Jin, Zhenlin Wei, Chujie Zheng, et al. Supergpqa: Scaling llm evaluation across 285 graduate disciplines. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 38, 2026.

Authors
Lab, N., :, Yang, C., Huang, C., Lan, F., Chen, H., Zhou, H., Song, H., Cao, J., Zhu, J., Niu, J., Wang, K., Huang, L., Liang, Q., Le, R., Feng, R., Sun, S., Gu, T., Zhang, T., Luo, T., Song, Y., Xing, Y., Wen, Y., Xu, Z., Chen, Z., & Li, Z.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2026
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7171348975
Cited by
0
References
0
Type
posted content
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
Keywords
agentic large language models, small language models, coding agents, tool use, agentic reinforcement learning, reasoning efficiency, OpenClaw

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-26.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-26.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review