StateM: Reaching 95.3% Raw Accuracy, or a \$15 Frontier Run, on Terminal-Bench 2.1 via Harness Scaling
Open accessAbstract
Long-horizon agents can fail even when their underlying models can solve the constituent steps. They may lose track of mutable state, fail to reactivate lessons from earlier executions, skip known procedures, or stop prematurely. We bet on harness scaling to improve the execution system around an agent without changing its model weights. We introduce StateM, an agent-native runtime that organizes execution around durable states, phase-local context, checked transitions, recoverable runbooks, and versioned procedural practices that agents and users can inspect together. On Terminal-Bench 2.1, StateM raises GPT-5.5 xhigh to 92.1\%, versus 83.1\% reference and GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra at 91.9\%. The runbook transfers unchanged to GPT-5.6. With GPT-5.6 Sol xhigh, StateM reaches 95.3\% raw accuracy across 445 trials and succeeds on all 89 tasks at least once. The frozen profile raises GPT-5.6 Luna from 76.7 to 85.4\%, above the 84.9\% Sol xhigh reference. Using the same runtime, runbook structure, and golden rules, less than \$38 of adaptation raises DeepSeek-V4 Flash from 82.7 to 88.1\% under standard timeouts and to 89.1\% on an 88-task common core. Extending only the remaining latency-sensitive task matches the reported 88.8\% GPT-5.6 Sol max result. Final-score API usage is about \$15 versus \$574.68 for the GPT reference; total DeepSeek expenditure is \$52.22. On BusinessBench, family-specific runbooks built on development sets yield held-out gains of 0.55 macro and 1.34 micro points; two mechanism-matched families improve by 10.04 points. Concrete rules generalize when tasks share execution structure, while the control methodology applies broadly. StateM turns selected postmortem findings into persistent, executable preconditions and practices, making learned controls explicit and enforceable through stateful controls. Code at github.com/henryqin1997/statem.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
StateM is an agent-native runtime that externalizes durable execution state, phase-local context, checked transitions, and versioned procedural practices without changing model weights. On Terminal-Bench 2.1, a frozen GPT-5.5-developed runbook reaches 95.28% raw accuracy with GPT-5.6 Sol xhigh, while an adapted DeepSeek-V4-Flash profile reaches 88.09% under standard timeouts with about $15.20 in final-evaluation API cost.
Key findings
- With GPT-5.5 xhigh, StateM records 92.1% on Terminal-Bench 2.1 versus an 83.1% GPT-5.5 reference, solving 88 of 89 tasks at least once; this is numerically above the separately reported 91.9% GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra reference.
- Freezing the GPT-5.5-developed runbook and applying it to GPT-5.6 Sol xhigh yields 95.28% raw accuracy, or 424/445 trials, with at least one success on all 89 tasks; the same frozen profile raises GPT-5.6 Luna from 76.7% to 85.4%.
- Direct frozen transfer to DeepSeek-V4-Flash changes 82.7% to 82.0%, but provider-specific adaptation reaches 88.09% (392/445) on the full benchmark, 89.09% (392/440) on the 88-task common core, and a descriptive 88.76% (395/445) aggregate with one extended-timeout task. Final DeepSeek evidence costs $15.20, with all recorded adaptation and evaluation at $52.22, versus $574.68 reported for the GPT-5.6 Sol max reference.
- On BusinessBench, frozen held-out gains are +0.55 macro and +1.34 micro percentage points; two mechanism-matched families improve by 10.04 points, while RefactorBench and WooCommerce Stock show negative transfer of -2.78 and -3.70 points respectively.
Methods
- StateM is a YAML-configured state-machine runtime and runbook with phase-level states, checked `goto` transitions, in/out hooks, before-transfer checks, recovery records, and versioned practices; the agent operates it through ordinary CLI commands. Evaluated results measure the combined runtime plus an evolved control profile, not the state-machine abstraction alone.
- Terminal-Bench 2.1 contains 89 tasks with five trials per task, for 445 trials. Experiments use Codex-based agents with GPT-5.5 xhigh, GPT-5.6 Sol xhigh, GPT-5.6 Luna, and DeepSeek-V4-Flash. The GPT-5.6 evaluations use a frozen GPT-5.5-developed profile; DeepSeek first tests frozen transfer, then permits a separate adaptation phase before final evaluation.
- BusinessBench contains 477 eligible instances across seven families; 405 instances across six families receive a StateM intervention. Family-specific profiles are developed on one split, frozen before the first held-out evaluation, and evaluated with one stochastic trajectory per arm. Cost accounting separates final-evaluation expenditure from adaptation expenditure.
Limitations
- The paper states that results measure the combined runtime and evolved, benchmark-adapted control profile, so they do not isolate the effect of the state-machine abstraction alone. It also states that the 95.3% result is a public, pre-adjudication submission rather than a finalized leaderboard result.
- The paper states that StateM cannot roll back arbitrary external side effects, cannot reconstruct unpersisted work or hidden model context, does not guarantee stop-hook success or termination, and cannot remove limits imposed by the base model, tools, environment, or execution budget. It also states that BusinessBench family sizes are unequal, each instance has one stochastic trajectory per arm, and only the first frozen held-out evaluation is untouched; later results are post-evaluation validation.
- The text makes evident additional limitations: exact-profile transfer fails across the provider boundary, negative transfer occurs when control is attached to the wrong execution boundary, evaluator feedback can encode conventions absent from the visible task contract, and the work is restricted to single-agent control flows rather than multi-agent runtimes.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
6 of 14 cited sources checked · 3 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
BusinessBench contains 477 eligible instances across seven families.
“BusinessBench (Yang et al., 2026) tests generalization at the task-family level.”
- Also stated in: § 4.5 Task Generalization Follows the Control Boundary · plain
“The benchmark contains 477 eligible instances across seven families.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Yang et al., 2026 source
Table I in B. Methodology lists seven business-relevant tasks, supporting the seven-family part of the claim. But its instance counts total 650 (six tasks with 100 each and one with 50), not 477, and the cited passages do not call the collection BusinessBench. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Also stated in: § 4.5 Task Generalization Follows the Control Boundary · plain
- Findingreasoning
On the disclosed latency-stable common core, which excludes only gpt2-codegolf, the same 392 successes give 392/440 = 89.09%.
“On the disclosed latency-stable common core, which excludes only gpt2-codegolf, the same 392 successes give 392 440 = 89.09%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The reference and StateM runs differ only in the harness, so the observed score differences are attributable to the harness.
- Findingown data
With GPT-5.6 Sol xhigh, StateM records 95.3% raw accuracy across 445 public-submission trials on Terminal-Bench 2.1.
“With GPT-5.6 Sol xhigh, the system records 95.3% raw accuracy across 445 public-submission trials”
- Also stated in: § Results and scope. · plain
“With GPT-5.6 Sol xhigh, the combined system records 95.28% raw accuracy in a public Terminal-Bench 2.1 submission.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Results and scope. · plain
- Findingown data
The instance-weighted micro average improves from 84.44% to 85.78%, a gain of 1.34 points.
“The instance-weighted micro average improves from 84.44% to 85.78%, a gain of 1.34 points.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The reference and StateM runs differ only in the harness, so the observed score differences are attributable to the harness.
- Findingown data
Less than $38 of DeepSeek API expenditure is sufficient to adapt the concrete practices from the same runtime, runbook structure, and golden rules, raising DeepSeek-V4 Flash from 82.7% to 88.1% on the full benchmark under standard timeouts.
“it takes less than $38 of adaptation cost to raise DeepSeek-V4 Flash from 82.7% to 88.1% on the full benchmark under standard timeouts.”
- Also stated in: § Results and scope. · plain
“Starting from the same runtime, high-level runbook structure, and golden rules, less than $38 of DeepSeek API expenditure is sufficient to adapt the concrete practices.”
- Also stated in: § Results and scope. · plain
“The adapted system reaches 392/445 = 88.09% on the full 89-task benchmark under standard timeouts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Results and scope. · plain
- Findingown data
Across five trials, GPT-5.5 xhigh with StateM solves 88 of the 89 Terminal-Bench 2.1 tasks at least once.
“Across five trials, the system solves 88 of the 89 tasks at least once.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
On BusinessBench, the first frozen held-out evaluation yields smaller aggregate gains of 0.55 macro and 1.34 micro percentage points.
“The first frozen held-out evaluation yields smaller aggregate gains of 0.55 macro and 1.34 micro percentage points”
- Also stated in: § Results and scope. · plain
“In the first frozen one-shot evaluation, held-out performance changes from 84.67% to 85.22% under an equal-family macro average, and from 84.44% to 85.78% under an instance-weighted micro average.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Results and scope. · plain
- Findingown data
Extending the timeout only for the remaining latency-sensitive task yields a descriptive full-suite aggregate matching the reported 88.8% GPT-5.6 Sol max result.
“Extending the timeout only for the remaining latency-sensitive task yields a descriptive full-suite aggregate matching the reported 88.8% GPT-5.6 Sol max result.”
- Also stated in: § Results and scope. · plain
“Extending the timeout only for that task yields a descriptive full-suite aggregate above the reported 88.8% GPT-5.6 Sol max result.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Also stated in: § Results and scope. · plain
- Findingown data
Under the reference harness, moving from GPT-5.5 to GPT-5.6 Sol changes the score from 83.1% to 84.9%, a 1.8-point model-generation shift.
“Under the reference harness, moving from GPT-5.5 to GPT-5.6 Sol changes the score from 83.1% to 84.9%, a 1.8-point model-generation shift.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The reference and StateM runs differ only in the harness, so the observed score differences are attributable to the harness.
- Findingreasoning
The equal-family held-out macro average for Budget Approval and Machine Operating rises from 71.91% to 81.94%, a 10.04-point gain computed from the unrounded family values.
“Their equal-family held-out macro average rises from 71.91% to 81.94%, a 10.04-point gain computed from the unrounded family values.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The reference and StateM runs differ only in the harness, so the observed score differences are attributable to the harness.
- Findingown data
The adapted DeepSeek system reaches 89.1% on a disclosed 88-task common core.
“It reaches 89.1% on a disclosed 88-task common core.”
- Also stated in: § Results and scope. · plain
“On the disclosed 88-task common core, which excludes the latency-sensitive gpt2-codegolf task, it reaches 392/440 = 89.09%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Results and scope. · plain
- Findingnone given
All recorded DeepSeek adaptation and evaluation API expenditure totals $52.22.
“All recorded DeepSeek adaptation and evaluation API expenditure totals $52.22.”
- Also stated in: § Results and scope. · plain
“All recorded DeepSeek API expenditure across profile adaptation and final evaluation is $52.22.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Also stated in: § Results and scope. · plain
- Findingown data
Directly applying the frozen GPT-developed profile to DeepSeek-V4-Flash changes the full-suite score from 82.7% to 82.0%.
“Directly applying the frozen GPT-developed profile to DeepSeek-V4-Flash changes the full-suite score from 82.7% to 82.0%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The reference and StateM runs differ only in the harness, so the observed score differences are attributable to the harness.
- Findingown data
With GPT-5.6 Sol xhigh, StateM succeeds at least once on each of the 89 Terminal-Bench 2.1 tasks.
“succeeds at least once on each of the 89 tasks”
- Also stated in: § Results and scope. · plain
“with at least one successful trial on every task.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Results and scope. · plain
- Findingown data
Two mechanism-matched BusinessBench task families improve by 10.04 points.
“two mechanism-matched task families improve by 10.04 points”
- Also stated in: § Results and scope. · plain
“An exploratory two-family slice containing Budget Approval and Machine Operating improves from 71.91% to 81.94%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Results and scope. · plain
- Findingown data
The runbook developed with GPT-5.5 transfers to GPT-5.6 without modification.
“The same runbook transfers to GPT-5.6 without modification.”
- Also stated in: § Results and scope. · plain
“We then freeze the runbook developed with GPT-5.5 and apply it to GPT-5.6 without modifying its control logic.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Results and scope. · plain
- Findingown data
On the untouched one-shot held-out split of BusinessBench, the equal-family macro average improves from 84.67% to 85.22%, a gain of 0.55 points.
“On the untouched one-shot held-out split, the equal-family macro average improves from 84.67% to 85.22%, a gain of 0.55 points.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The reference and StateM runs differ only in the harness, so the observed score differences are attributable to the harness.
- Findingnone given
The Terminal-Bench video tasks do not fully specify target-frame precision.
“The Terminal-Bench video tasks do not fully specify target-frame precision.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Throughout the 22-hour run, the durable StateM record provided the current phase, transition history, unresolved obligations, and recovery anchor.
“Throughout the run, the durable StateM record provided the current phase, transition history, unresolved obligations, and recovery anchor.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In one Terminal-Bench profile-development run, the hyper-agent continued for 22 hours across long interaction history, context refresh or compaction, and stop-hook continuation.
“In one Terminal-Bench profile-development run, the hyper-agent continued for 22 hours across long interaction history, context refresh or compaction, and stop-hook continuation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
In the DNA insertion tasks, the verifier selects the left-most valid insertion boundary even though that convention is absent from the visible task description.
“In the DNA insertion tasks, the verifier selects the left-most valid insertion boundary even though that convention is absent from the visible task description.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
During development, the hyper-agent introduces default precision values after observing benchmark behavior.
“During development, the hyper-agent introduces default precision values after observing benchmark behavior.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The standard-timeout full-suite result is 392/445 = 88.09%.
“The standard-timeout full-suite result is 392/445 = 88.09%; the common-core result is 392/440 = 89.09%;and the descriptive aggregate is 395/445 = 88.76% after evaluating only gpt2-codegolf with the extended timeout.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The 88.8% Sol max score and the $574.68 public-submission cost originate from different evaluations.
“The 88.8% Sol max score and the $574.68 public-submission cost originate from different evaluations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The common-core result is 392/440 = 89.09%.
“The standard-timeout full-suite result is 392/445 = 88.09%; the common-core result is 392/440 = 89.09%;and the descriptive aggregate is 395/445 = 88.76% after evaluating only gpt2-codegolf with the extended timeout.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Recent evidence finds settings in which a strong model given the full procedure in context outperforms a more heavily orchestrated version of the same procedure.
“Recent evidence finds settings in which a strong model given the full procedure in context outperforms a more heavily orchestrated version of the same procedure (Dennis et al., 2026).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dennis et al., 2026 source
- Interpretationown data
Harness transfer changes the economics of deployment.
“Harness transfer changes the economics of deployment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
StateM converts selected generalizable postmortem findings into persistent, executable preconditions and practices.
“StateM converts selected generalizable postmortem findings into persistent, executable preconditions and practices.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
In the settings studied here, the model appears not to be the (main) bottleneck.
“In the settings studied here, the model appears not to be the (main) bottleneck.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
StateM makes explicit and enforceable what the agent should know, what it should do, and which learned practices should be reactivated in future runs.
“It thereby makes explicit and enforceable what the agent should know, what it should do, and which learned practices should be reactivated in future runs -all through stateful controls.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
The Terminal-Bench control profile is developed with GPT-5.5 and then frozen before application to GPT-5.6.
“The Terminal-Bench profile is developed with GPT-5.5 and then frozen before application to GPT-5.6.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The execution harness changes completed-task performance far more than the observed generation-to-generation model shift.
“Here, the execution harness changes completed-task performance far more than the observed generation-to-generation model shift.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The reference and StateM runs differ only in the harness, so the observed score differences are attributable to the harness.
- Interpretationown data
The observed system-level harness gain can resemble a model-generation upgrade.
“This comparison illustrates that the observed system-level harness gain can resemble a model-generation upgrade.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
AgingBench's revision aging results show that mutable or derived state can fail even when additional text memory is available.
“First, its revision aging results show that mutable or derived state can fail even when additional text memory is available, supporting the need for explicit state representations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhu et al., 2026
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
Exact-profile transfer fails across the provider boundary.
“Exact-profile transfer fails across this provider boundary.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Model capability and execution reliability make separate contributions to system performance.
“Model capability and execution reliability make separate contributions to system performance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Luna with StateM numerically exceeds the 84.9% Sol xhigh reference despite using the lower-cost model tier.
“Luna with StateM therefore numerically exceeds the 84.9% Sol xhigh reference despite using the lower-cost model tier.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The first BusinessBench profiles reveal a third failure mode: even a valid failure can be abstracted incorrectly.
“The first BusinessBench profiles reveal a third failure mode: even a valid failure can be abstracted incorrectly.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Relevant knowledge may be unavailable at the decision point.
“Relevant knowledge may be unavailable at the decision point; a lesson from prior experience may not be retained or activated; or an active procedure may not be completed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
StateM is designed to combine agent-native autonomy with enforceable control.
“StateM is designed to combine these two properties.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Evaluator feedback enters memory through the same route.
“Evaluator feedback enters memory through the same route.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Failure-driven optimization can preserve the wrong lesson.
“Failure-driven optimization can preserve the wrong lesson.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The transfer results show that procedural control is hierarchical rather than universal.
“The transfer results show that procedural control is hierarchical rather than universal.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
For a task with loops and branches, the interleaved versions make the current state hard to reconstruct under an append-only context.
“For a simple task (left) the latest value is still recoverable; for a task with loops and branches (right) the interleaved versions make the current state hard to reconstruct.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Our results distinguish three ways in which an otherwise capable model can fail.
“More broadly, our results distinguish three ways in which an otherwise capable model can fail.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The 22-hour result does not imply unbounded execution.
“The runtime sustains a day-scale development loop while keeping procedural state external to the changing model context; the result does not imply unbounded execution.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The observed slowdown in the 22-hour run came from accumulated terminal output that remained unfolded in the interface, rather than loss of the StateM control state.
“The observed slowdown came from accumulated terminal output that remained unfolded in the interface, rather than loss of the StateM control state.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
The evaluated profile is frozen before any GPT-5.6 outcomes are observed.
“The evaluated profile is frozen before any GPT-5.6outcomes are observed”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Plan tokens are diluted by execution tokens in a long run.
“They are diluted by execution tokens in a long run.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
For a simple task, the latest value is still recoverable under an append-only context.
“For a simple task (left) the latest value is still recoverable; for a task with loops and branches (right) the interleaved versions make the current state hard to reconstruct.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
This work studies harness scaling as a capability axis complementary to model scaling.
“This work studies harness scaling as a capability axis complementary to model scaling.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
A lesson from prior experience may not be retained or activated.
“Relevant knowledge may be unavailable at the decision point; a lesson from prior experience may not be retained or activated; or an active procedure may not be completed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Across the seven families, harness generalization follows mechanism match, not task diversity.
“Across the seven families, harness generalization follows mechanism match, not task diversity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The benchmark tasks and families are representative of the broader task distributions to which the transfer claims generalize.
- Interpretationreasoning
Repeated feedback can lead the profile to reproduce the verifier's left-most insertion convention without ever reading verifier code.
“Repeated feedback can lead the profile to reproduce that convention without ever reading verifier code.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
State maintenance degrades with task complexity.
“Figure 7 State maintenance degrades with task complexity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
StateM cannot remove limits imposed by the base model, tools, environment, or execution budget.
“StateM can organize available knowledge and execution control, but it cannot remove limits imposed by the base model, tools, environment, or execution budget”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
StateM can organize available knowledge and execution control.
“StateM can organize available knowledge and execution control, but it cannot remove limits imposed by the base model, tools, environment, or execution budget”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 87
- May combine two claims. 76
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe BusinessBench dataset contains 477 eligible instances across seven task families.
“The dataset contains 477 eligible instances across seven task families.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Yang et al., 2026 source
The Experiment Setups and Table I in Methodology describe seven business-relevant tasks. Table I lists 100 instances for each of six tasks and 50 for the seventh—a total of 650, not 477. The cited passages do not identify this suite as BusinessBench or describe 477 eligible instances. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAgentic Harness Engineering uses execution observability to evolve coding-agent tools, middleware, prompts, and memory from trajectory feedback.
“Agentic Harness Engineering uses execution observability to evolve coding-agent tools, middleware, prompts, and memory from trajectory feedback (Lin et al., 2026;Gu, 2026).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Lin et al., 2026 source
- cites Gu, 2026
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSelf-Harness lets an agent mine its weaknesses, propose harness modifications, and promote them through regression-aware validation.
“Self-Harness lets an agent mine its weaknesses, propose harness modifications, and promote them through regression-aware validation (Zhang et al., 2026).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhang et al., 2026 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTerminal-Bench 2.1 contains 89 tasks.
“Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Merrill et al., 2026) contains 89 tasks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Merrill et al., 2026 source
The Introduction (p. 2) and Dataset Construction (p. 3) say that Terminal-Bench 2.0 contains 89 tasks. Our copy does not establish that Terminal-Bench 2.1 has the same task count, so the cited paper supports the number but not the version in the claim. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationBetter Harnesses, Smaller Models studies automated harness adaptation as a way for lower-cost models to recover much of the performance of larger models.
“Better Harnesses, Smaller Models studies automated harness adaptation as a way for lower-cost models to recover much of the performance of larger models (Yang et al., 2026).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Yang et al., 2026 source
The quote only partly states this claim.
FindingreasoningEven the entire $52.22 adaptation-and-evaluation campaign uses about 1/11 of the public GPT-5.6 Sol max submission's recorded cost.
“Even the entire $52.22 adaptation-and-evaluation campaign uses about 1/11 of that amount.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The public submission records and OpenAI-reported scores are accurate and comparable to the authors' evaluation conditions.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataBudget Approval improves from 62.91% to 75.12% (+12.21), and Machine Operating improves from 90.79% to 100.00% (+9.21).
“Budget Approval improves from 62.91% to 75.12% (+12.21), and Machine Operating improves from 90.79% to 100.00% (+9.21).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The reference and StateM runs differ only in the harness, so the observed score differences are attributable to the harness.
May combine two claims.
Findingown datagpt2-codegolf is 0/5 under the standard timeout, but DeepSeek-V4-Flash with StateM solves it in 3 of 5 trials under an extended per-task timeout.
“gpt2-codegolf is 0/5 under the standard timeout, but DeepSeek-V4-Flash with StateM solves it in 3 of 5 trials under an extended per-task timeout.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The reference and StateM runs differ only in the harness, so the observed score differences are attributable to the harness.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataSol xhigh with StateM records 95.28% raw accuracy on Terminal-Bench 2.1, compared with the 84.9% GPT-5.6 Sol xhigh reference.
“Sol xhigh with StateM records 424 445 = 95.28%raw accuracy, reported as 95.3% at one decimal, compared with the 84.9% GPT-5.6 Sol xhigh reference.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The reference and StateM runs differ only in the harness, so the observed score differences are attributable to the harness.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataRefactorBench changes from 80.56% to 77.78% (-2.78), and WooCommerce Stock changes from 92.59% to 88.89% (-3.70).
“RefactorBench changes from 80.56% to 77.78% (-2.78), and WooCommerce Stock changes from 92.59% to 88.89% (-3.70).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The reference and StateM runs differ only in the harness, so the observed score differences are attributable to the harness.
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe DeepSeek evidence uses 2.65% of the public GPT-5.6 Sol max submission's recorded cost, or 1/37.8 as much; its standard-timeout full-suite score is 88.09%, compared with 83.37% raw for the matched public GPT artifact.
“The DeepSeek evidence uses 2.65% of that submission's recorded cost, or 1/37.8 as much; its standard-timeout full-suite score is 88.09%, compared with 83.37% raw for the matched public GPT artifact.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The public submission records and OpenAI-reported scores are accurate and comparable to the authors' evaluation conditions.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataWith GPT-5.5 xhigh, the StateM system records 92.1% on Terminal-Bench 2.1, compared with the 83.1% GPT-5.5 Codex reference.
“With GPT-5.5 xhigh, our StateM system records 92.1% on Terminal-Bench 2.1, compared with the 83.1% GPT-5.5 Codex reference.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The reference and StateM runs differ only in the harness, so the observed score differences are attributable to the harness.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataGPT-5.5 xhigh with StateM reaches 92.1% accuracy on Terminal-Bench 2.1, compared with an 83.1% GPT-5.5 reference and numerically close to the 91.9% next-generation reference.
“On Terminal-Bench 2.1, GPT-5.5 xhigh with StateM reaches 92.1% accuracy, compared with an 83.1% reference and surpassing GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra (91.9%).”
- Also stated in: § Results and scope. · plain
“At the quality frontier, GPT-5.5 xhigh with StateM reaches 92.1% accuracy on Terminal-Bench 2.1, compared with the 83.1% GPT-5.5 reference.”
- Also stated in: § Results and scope. · plain
“Its 92.1% mean is also numerically close to the 91.9% next-generation reference.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Results and scope. · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe complete DeepSeek final-score evidence costs $15.20 in realized API charges; provider-specific adaptation costs $37.02, bringing all recorded DeepSeek adaptation and final-evaluation expenditure to $52.22.
“The complete DeepSeek final-score evidence costs $15.20 in realized API charges.Provider-specific adaptation costs $37.02, bringing all recorded DeepSeek adaptation and final-evaluation expenditure to $52.22.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The model cost figures reflect the true economic cost of the runs.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataWith no GPT-5.6-specific change to its control logic, the frozen profile raises GPT-5.6 Luna from 76.7% to 85.4%, a gain of 8.7 points.
“With no GPT-5.6-specificchange to its control logic, the profile accompanies the 84.9% to 95.28% Sol xhigh difference reported above and raises GPT-5.6 Luna from 76.7% to 85.4%, a gain of 8.7 points.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The reference and StateM runs differ only in the harness, so the observed score differences are attributable to the harness.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataProvider-specific adaptation raises the full 89-task standard-timeout result to 392/445 = 88.09%, a gain of 5.39 points over the 82.7% full-suite baseline.
“Starting from the same runtime, runbook structure, applicable controls, and golden rules, provider-specific adaptation raises the full 89-task standard-timeout result to 392 445 = 88.09%, a gain of 5.39 points over the 82.7% full-suite baseline.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The reference and StateM runs differ only in the harness, so the observed score differences are attributable to the harness.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataOn BusinessBench, development performance improves from 86.07% to 91.71%, and performance across all treated instances improves from 84.76% to 88.72%.
“Development performance improves from 86.07% to 91.71%, while performance across all treated instances improves from 84.76% to 88.72%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe DeepSeek cost amounts are approximately 38.9× and 11.0× lower than the GPT reference amounts.
“These amounts are approximately 38.9× and 11.0× lower, respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningCombining the disclosed extended-timeout trials with the 88-task common-core result yields a descriptive full-suite aggregate of 395/445 = 88.76%, which rounds to 88.8% and matches the separately reported GPT-5.6 Sol max score at one-decimal precision.
“Combining those disclosed trials with the 88-task common-core result yields a descriptive full-suite aggregate of 392 + 3 445 = 395 445 = 88.76%, which rounds to 88.8% and matches the separately reported GPT-5.6 Sol max score at one-decimal precision.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The reference and StateM runs differ only in the harness, so the observed score differences are attributable to the harness.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe frozen runbook raises GPT-5.6 Luna from 76.7% to 85.4%, numerically above the 84.9% Sol xhigh reference.
“The frozen profile also raises GPT-5.6 Luna from 76.7% to 85.4%, numerically above the 84.9% Sol xhigh reference.”
- Also stated in: § Results and scope. · plain
“The frozen runbook also raises GPT-5.6 Luna from 76.7% to 85.4%, a gain of 8.7%.”
- Also stated in: § Results and scope. · plain
“This result is numerically above the 84.9% Sol xhigh reference.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Results and scope. · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAcross five trials, GPT-5.5 with StateM solves 88 of the 89 tasks at least once, corresponding to 98.9% five-trial task coverage.
“Across five trials, GPT-5.5 with StateM solves 88 of the 89 tasks at least once, corresponding to 98.9% five-trial task coverage.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The reference and StateM runs differ only in the harness, so the observed score differences are attributable to the harness.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe complete DeepSeek final-score evidence costs approximately $15 in API usage, compared with $574.68 reported for the GPT reference.
“The complete DeepSeek final-score evidence costs approximately $15 in API usage, compared with the $574.68 reported for the GPT reference.”
- Also stated in: § Results and scope. · plain
“The complete DeepSeek final-score evidence costs approximately $15 in realized API charges, compared with $574.68 reported for the GPT-5.6Sol max reference.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Results and scope. · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataDevelopment performance improves from 86.07% to 91.71% (+5.64), and performance over all treated instances improves from 84.76% to 88.72% (+3.96).
“Development performance improves from 86.07% to 91.71% (+5.64), and performance over all treated instances improves from 84.76% to 88.72% (+3.96).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The reference and StateM runs differ only in the harness, so the observed score differences are attributable to the harness.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe StateM reference differences are +9.0 points on GPT-5.5 and +10.4 points on GPT-5.6 Sol.
“The StateM reference differences are +9.0 points on GPT-5.5 and +10.4 points on GPT-5.6 Sol.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The reference and StateM runs differ only in the harness, so the observed score differences are attributable to the harness.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataConcrete practices transfer unchanged across the GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 generations, but do not transfer unchanged to DeepSeek-V4 Flash.
“Concrete practices transfer unchanged across the GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 generations, but do not transfer unchanged to DeepSeek-V4 Flash.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenEarly WooCommerce control misses the invariants that connect its systems.
“RefactorBench receives excessive compatibility procedure, retrieval-oriented WebArena receives a workflow that is too heavy, and early WooCommerce control misses the invariants that connect its systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningAttendance shows that the correct policy can be not to introduce a StateM workflow at all.
“Attendance shows that the correct policy can be not to introduce a StateM workflow at all.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataGPT-5.6 Sol xhigh + StateM records 95.28% raw and $1,062.95 submission-reported model cost, and DeepSeek-V4-Flash + StateM records 88.76% descriptive accuracy and $15.20 realized final-evaluation expenditure.
“GPT-5.6 Sol xhigh + StateM at 95.28% raw and $1,062.95submission-reported model cost, and DeepSeek-V4-Flash + StateM at 88.76% descriptive accuracy and $15.20 realized final-evaluation expenditure.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe treated set contains 405 instances across six families, or 810 genuine treatment/control executions.
“The treated set therefore contains 405 instances across six families, or 810 genuine treatment/control executions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningFor the reported formal run submission, the authors use AWS m7i.4xlarge because Daytona would encounter sandbox/verifier/network/pytorch-install timeout more frequently.
“For the reported formal run submission, we use AWS m7i.4xlarge, because daytona would encounter sandbox/verifier/network/pytorch-install timeout more frequently, and personal Macbook Pro 2025 (M4 chip) is not compatible with tune-mjcf kernel requirement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAfter replacing generic control with WooCommerce invariants, a post-evaluation matched rerun improves overall performance from 86.42% to 90.12%, including an improvement from 85.37% to 90.24% on the reused held-out split.
“After replacing generic control with these invariants, a post-evaluation matched rerun improves overall performance from 86.42% to 90.12%, including an improvement from 85.37% to 90.24% on the reused held-out split.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The reference and StateM runs differ only in the harness, so the observed score differences are attributable to the harness.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAt the quality frontier, GPT-5.6 Sol xhigh with a runbook frozen from GPT-5.5 records 95.3% raw accuracy on Terminal-Bench 2.1, or 424 successful trials out of 445, with at least one success on every task.
“At the quality frontier, GPT-5.6 Sol xhigh with a runbook frozen from GPT-5.5 records 95.3% raw accuracy on Terminal-Bench 2.1, or 424 successful trials out of 445, with at least one success on every task.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenWebArena's frozen evaluation contains only three non-tied A/B outcomes across 25 instances: development has 2 wins, 10 ties, and 0 losses; held-out has 0 wins, 12 ties, and 1 loss.
“Its frozen evaluation contains only three non-tied A/B outcomes across 25 instances: development has 2 wins, 10 ties, and 0 losses; held-out has 0 wins, 12 ties, and 1 loss.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The reference and StateM runs differ only in the harness, so the observed score differences are attributable to the harness.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Findingnone givenA personal MacBook Pro 2025 (M4 chip) is not compatible with the tune-mjcf kernel requirement.
“For the reported formal run submission, we use AWS m7i.4xlarge, because daytona would encounter sandbox/verifier/network/pytorch-install timeout more frequently, and personal Macbook Pro 2025 (M4 chip) is not compatible with tune-mjcf kernel requirement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThe public $574.68 GPT-5.6 Sol max submission is plotted at its matched 83.37% raw score.
“The public $574.68GPT-5.6 Sol max submission is plotted at its matched 83.37% raw score.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe actual usage was less than $125 of the $200 budget.
“Thanks again to Codex's pro plan so we can have chance to do such an individual research work within 200$ budget, and the actual usage is less than 125$ of it.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWebTest later matched reruns reach 100.0% on development and 99.5% on the reused held-out split for both arms, or 99.75% overall.
“WebTest is nearly saturated: later matched reruns reach 100.0% on development and 99.5% on the reused held-out split for both arms, or 99.75% overall.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The reference and StateM runs differ only in the harness, so the observed score differences are attributable to the harness.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThe horizontal 88.8% reference denotes the separately reported GPT-5.6 Sol max score.
“The horizontal 88.8% reference denotes the separately reported GPT-5.6 Sol max score.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenRefactorBench receives excessive compatibility procedure.
“RefactorBench receives excessive compatibility procedure, retrieval-oriented WebArena receives a workflow that is too heavy, and early WooCommerce control misses the invariants that connect its systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenRetrieval-oriented WebArena receives a workflow that is too heavy.
“RefactorBench receives excessive compatibility procedure, retrieval-oriented WebArena receives a workflow that is too heavy, and early WooCommerce control misses the invariants that connect its systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe main computation resource for the work was a personal Codex pro plan and a MacBook Pro 2025 (M4 chip).
“The main computation resouce, is personal Codex pro plan and Macbook Pro 2025 (M4 chip).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe profile developed with GPT-5.5 transfers unchanged to GPT-5.6 Sol xhigh, where the reference difference grows from +9.0 to +10.4 points.
“The profile developed with GPT-5.5 transfers unchanged to GPT-5.6 Sol xhigh, where the reference difference grows from +9.0 to +10.4 points.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenWooCommerce improves when generic procedure is replaced by the actual cross-system invariants.
“WooCommerce improves when generic procedure is replaced by the actual cross-system invariants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn a post-evaluation matched rerun, RefactorBench overall score changes from 76.39% to 79.17%; on the development split, the revised StateM arm improves from 75.00% to 80.56%; on the reused held-out split, it remains 77.78%.
“In a post-evaluation matched rerun, the overall score changes from 76.39% to 79.17%.On the development split, the revised StateM arm improves from 75.00% to 80.56%; on the reused held-out split, it remains 77.78%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The reference and StateM runs differ only in the harness, so the observed score differences are attributable to the harness.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenOn a personal MacBook Pro 2025, GPT-5.5 xhigh reaches around 91% pass rate on Terminal Bench 2.1.
“On a personal Macbook Pro 2025, GPT-5.5 xhigh can reaches around 91% pass rate on Terminal Bench 2.1.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe baseline agent scores 0/5 on configure-git-webserver because it does not reliably preserve and validate the required end-to-end live state; with StateM, the result moves from 0/5 to 5/5.
“The baseline agent can configure Git, SSH, hooks, and an HTTP server, yet scores 0/5 because it does not reliably preserve and validate the required end-to-end live state.”
- Also stated in: § 4.6 Failure-Boundary Evidence: Where StateM Intervenes · plain
“The result moves from 0/5 to 5/5.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The reference and StateM runs differ only in the harness, so the observed score differences are attributable to the harness.
- Also stated in: § 4.6 Failure-Boundary Evidence: Where StateM Intervenes · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAt the cost frontier, an adapted DeepSeek-V4 Flash system reaches 88.09% on the full benchmark under standard timeouts and 89.09% on the disclosed 88-task common core.
“At the cost frontier, an adapted DeepSeek-V4 Flash system reaches 88.09% on the full benchmark under standard timeouts and 89.09% on the disclosed 88-task common core.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataStateM improves task-level success on several Terminal-Bench 2.1 tasks for GPT-5.5, with gains ranging from +1 to +5 successful trials out of five.
“Table 3 Representative Terminal-Bench 2.1 task-level improvements for GPT-5.5Each result is the number of successful trials out of five for one task.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The reference and StateM runs differ only in the harness, so the observed score differences are attributable to the harness.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenRefactorBench improves when repeated compatibility review is replaced by a smaller obligation-and-closure practice.
“RefactorBench improves when repeated compatibility review is replaced by a smaller obligation-and-closure practice.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe adapted DeepSeek-V4 Flash system's final evidence costs approximately $15 in DeepSeek API usage, while the complete recorded DeepSeek API expenditure for adaptation and evaluation is $52.22.
“Its final evidence costs approximately $15 in DeepSeek API usage, while the complete recorded DeepSeek API expenditure for adaptation and evaluation is $52.22.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe descriptive aggregate is 395/445 = 88.76% after evaluating only gpt2-codegolf with the extended timeout.
“The standard-timeout full-suite result is 392/445 = 88.09%; the common-core result is 392/440 = 89.09%;and the descriptive aggregate is 395/445 = 88.76% after evaluating only gpt2-codegolf with the extended timeout.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenThe 91.9% Sol ultra value is a numeric frontier reference from a different high-compute configuration.
“The 91.9% Sol ultra value is likewise a numeric frontier reference from a different high-compute configuration”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe public GPT-5.5 reference is 83.15% over trials with Codex agent version 0.125.0 and $2,059.19 reported model cost; the authors round its score to 83.1%.
“The public GPT-5.5 reference is 83.15% over trials with Codex agent version 0.125.0 and $2,059.19 reported model cost; we round its score to 83.1%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe $574.68 submission reports 83.37% raw before adjudication and 76.18% after adjudication.
“The $574.68 submission reports 83.37% raw before adjudication and 76.18% after adjudication.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenThe StateM runtime is designed to be reusable across agents and workflows.
“The StateM runtime is designed to be reusable across agents and workflows”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataRuntime semantics and principles for harness development can transfer broadly, while concrete practices transfer locally or require inexpensive adaptation.
“We instead advocate that runtime semantics and principles for harness development can transfer broadly, while concrete practices transfer locally or require inexpensive adaptation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningStateM's transition protocol is checked, logged, and recoverable, rather than fully transactional.
“We describe this protocol as checked, logged, and recoverable, rather than fully transactional.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningStateM cannot generally roll back arbitrary external side effects produced by hooks.
“StateM delays the runtime-state commit until required pre-commit operations succeed, but it cannot generally roll back arbitrary external side effects produced by hooks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningReliable recovery depends on placing persistence hooks at appropriate phase boundaries and designing repeated hooks to tolerate retry.
“Reliable recovery consequently depends on placing persistence hooks at appropriate phase boundaries and designing repeated hooks to tolerate retry.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe specific contribution of StateM is a lightweight agent-facing control representation in which state boundaries are both refreshed control contexts and auditable transition contracts.
“The specific contribution of StateM is a lightweight agent-facing control representation in which state boundaries are both refreshed control contexts and auditable transition contracts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe results do not suggest that model scaling has ceased to matter or that a static runbook can dominate every model, task, and benchmark.
“The results do not suggest that model scaling has ceased to matter or that a static runbook can dominate every model, task, and benchmark.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationCurrent agents frequently depart from their plans, omit necessary steps, or terminate without satisfying the original completion criteria.
“Nevertheless, current agents frequently depart from their plans, omit necessary steps, or terminate without satisfying the original completion criteria (Liu et al., 2026).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Liu et al., 2026
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningA state serves as a context boundary that refreshes phase-local control signal and makes durable progress available.
“A state serves first as a context boundary.”
- Also stated in: § 3.2 States as Context-and-Contract Boundaries · plain
“Entry hooks refresh the phase-local control signal and make durable progress available.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § 3.2 States as Context-and-Contract Boundaries · plain
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe Terminal-Bench results evaluate the combined runtime and an evolved, benchmark-adapted control profile, and should not be interpreted as isolating the effect of the state-machine abstraction alone.
“In particular, the Terminal-Bench results in Section 4 evaluate the combined runtime and an evolved, benchmark-adapted control profile.They should not be interpreted as isolating the effect of the state-machine abstraction alone.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningA state serves as a contract boundary with exit hooks and checks specifying conditions for leaving it.
“A state also serves as a contract boundary.”
- Also stated in: § 3.2 States as Context-and-Contract Boundaries · plain
“The state prompt describes the work expected within the phase, while exit hooks and checks specify the conditions for leaving it.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § 3.2 States as Context-and-Contract Boundaries · plain
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningStateM addresses the tension between runtime enforceability and agent autonomy by preserving broad agent discretion within phases while making progress between phases explicit, persistent, and checkable.
“StateM addresses this tension by preserving broad agent discretion within phases while making progress between phases explicit, persistent, and checkable.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationnone givenThe content of a runbook may encode workflow-specific or experience-derived procedural knowledge.
“the content of a runbook may encode workflow-specific or experience-derived procedural knowledge.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationStateFlow represents problem solving through explicit states and transitions, demonstrating that state-driven execution can improve task grounding and failure recovery.
“StateFlow represents problem solving through explicit states and transitions, demonstrating that state-driven execution can improve task grounding and failure recovery (Wu et al., 2024).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wu et al., 2024
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLangGraph and related durable workflow systems provide persistent state, conditional edges, checkpointing, interruption, and human-in-the-loop recovery.
“LangGraph and related durable workflow systems provide persistent state, conditional edges, checkpointing, interruption, and human-in-the-loop recovery (Wang and Duan, 2024).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wang and Duan, 2024 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLife-Harness converts recurring failures into reusable interventions over environment contracts, procedural skills, action realization, and trajectory regulation, then freezes the resulting harness for held-out evaluation.
“Life-Harness converts recurring failures into reusable interventions over environment contracts, procedural skills, action realization, and trajectory regulation, then freezes the resulting harness for held-out evaluation (Xu et al., 2026).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Xu et al., 2026
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAgingBench frames deployed agents as time-evolving systems whose effective behavior can change even when model weights remain frozen.
“AgingBench frames deployed agents as time-evolving systems whose effective behavior can change even when model weights remain frozen (Zhu et al., 2026).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhu et al., 2026
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataConcrete runbook rules generalize when tasks share the relevant execution structure, while the methodology for identifying and enforcing such controls remains applicable across more heterogeneous workflows.
“These results suggest that concrete runbook rules generalize when tasks share the relevant execution structure, while the methodology for identifying and enforcing such controls remains applicable across more heterogeneous workflows.”
- Also stated in: § Results and scope. · hedged
“This pattern suggests that the largest gains occur when the control profile matches a specific execution boundary.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Results and scope. · hedged
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenDevelopment principles transfer across providers.
“Together with the benchmark results, this completes the transfer hierarchy: exact runbooks transfer across nearby models, development principles transfer across providers, and control-boundary abstractions transfer across tasks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIn StateM, the agent continues to reason and act in its native interaction loop, while states, hooks, transition conditions, and practices provide a control surface that both agents can modify and humans can inspect and enforce.
“The agent continues to reason and act in its native interaction loop, while states, hooks, transition conditions, and practices provide a control surface that both agents can modify and humans can inspect and enforce.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThis makes the control layer itself amenable to rapid iteration, a prerequisite for harness scaling, where repeated execution experience is used to continuously improve the runtime rather than only the model or prompt.
“This makes the control layer itself amenable to rapid iteration-a prerequisite for harness scaling, where repeated execution experience is used to continuously improve the runtime rather than only the model or prompt.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe resulting behavior agrees with the evaluator, but its semantics come from the evaluator rather than the stated task contract.
“The resulting behavior agrees with the evaluator, but its semantics come from the evaluator rather than the stated task contract.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenUnder an append-only context with no in-place editing, each update is appended rather than written back.
“Under an append-only context with no in-place editing, each update is appended rather than written back.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). The quote only partly states this claim.
InterpretationreasoningStronger-agent or human review matters at the level of deciding which abstraction deserves to become durable control.
“Stronger-agent or human review matters at this level.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenAgent-native systems such as Codex and Claude Code allow the model to plan and revise its behavior fluidly inside the agent loop, but much of this control remains model-mediated: plans, checklists, and self-review can guide behavior without providing the same persistent, auditable, and externally enforceable transition semantics.
“At the other extreme, agent-native systems such as Codex and Claude Code allow the model to plan and revise its behavior fluidly inside the agent loop, but much of this control remains model-mediated: plans, checklists, and self-review can guide behavior without providing the same persistent, auditable, and externally enforceable transition semantics.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe table associates each gain with the StateM control active in that task; the association is not a component ablation.
“The table associates each gain with the StateM control active in that task; the association is not a component ablation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenHarness scaling helps the system remember what experience has taught it to do without training, and ensures that it actually does so before proceeding.
“Model scaling expands what an agent can do; harness scaling helps the system remember what experience has taught it to do without training, and ensures that it actually does so before proceeding.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningMore remembered procedure is not better memory.
“More remembered procedure is not better memory.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningSeparating agents by role can provide different context views and independent decision boundaries, while role-specific read/write permissions can restrict which artifacts, state, or actions each agent may modify.
“Separating agents by role can provide different context views and independent decision boundaries, while role-specific read/write permissions can restrict which artifacts, state, or actions each agent may modify.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe results measure the combined StateM system, including the profile's evolved prompts, routing, checks, and practices; they do not isolate the state-machine runtime from the procedural content encoded in the runbook.
“The results measure this combined system, including the profile's evolved prompts, routing, checks, and practices; they do not isolate the state-machine runtime from the procedural content encoded in the runbook.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningSuch isolation may be useful for review, verification, delegation, and recovery from decisions that would otherwise become self-reinforcing within one context.
“Such isolation may be useful for review, verification, delegation, and recovery from decisions that would otherwise become self-reinforcing within one context.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningOne runbook does not fit every workflow.
“StateM does not make every model universally stronger, and one runbook does not fit every workflow.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningA stop hook does not guarantee eventual success or termination.
“A stop hook does not guarantee eventual success or termination.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThe objective is to remember the consequential boundary, not every failure trace.
“The objective is to remember the consequential boundary, not every failure trace.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationnone givenDeciding which abstraction deserves to become durable control is itself a difficult reasoning task.
“Failure traces provide experience; deciding which abstraction deserves to become durable control is itself a difficult reasoning task.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe 95.3% raw accuracy result remains a public, pre-adjudication submission rather than a finalized leaderboard result.
“This remains a public, pre-adjudication submission rather than a finalized leaderboard result.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenIn every setting, profile construction may use the visible task specification, workspace artifacts, public documentation, and observable execution feedback.
“In every setting, profile construction may use the visible task specification, workspace artifacts, public documentation, and observable execution feedback.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe same separation of state, context, and permissions also motivates multi-agent runtimes.
“This work focuses on controlling the execution of a single autonomous agent, but the same separation of state, context, and permissions also motivates multi-agent runtimes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningEffective procedural memory requires addition, revision, and removal.
“Effective procedural memory requires addition, revision, and removal.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAs the control policy evolves, modifying the structure of conventional runtimes becomes an engineering task of its own, making rapid failure-driven iteration increasingly heavy.
“As the control policy evolves, modifying this structure becomes an engineering task of its own, making rapid failure-driven iteration increasingly heavy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningHarness scaling is an abstraction problem, not rule accumulation.
“Harness scaling is an abstraction problem, not rule accumulation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningCommands that modify external services or non-versioned artifacts should be idempotent where possible and should record sufficient information for explicit compensation or retry.
“Commands that modify external services or non-versioned artifacts should therefore be idempotent where possible and should record sufficient information for explicit compensation or retry.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe central scaling problem is not how many rules a harness remembers, but which lessons should persist, where they should intervene, and whether they survive a change of model or task.
“The central scaling problem is therefore not how many rules a harness remembers, but which lessons should persist, where they should intervene, and whether they survive a change of model or task.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningStateM's value is to make execution failures inspectable and to convert selected lessons into reusable control.
“Its value is to make execution failures inspectable and to convert selected lessons into reusable control.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe runtime sustains a day-scale development loop while keeping procedural state external to the changing model context.
“The runtime sustains a day-scale development loop while keeping procedural state external to the changing model context; the result does not imply unbounded execution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe default precision values show how an ambiguous specification can be resolved post hoc and then stored as if it were a universal practice.
“These defaults may be operationally useful, but they also show how an ambiguous specification can be resolved post hoc and then stored as if it were a universal practice.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningExperience must be filtered before it becomes memory.
“The design rule is direct: experience must be filtered before it becomes memory.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningStateM adds no new component-level capability in the configure-git-webserver case; it composes, checks, and closes capabilities already available to the model before the consequential handoff boundary.
“StateM adds no new component-level capability in this case.It composes, checks, and closes capabilities already available to the model before the consequential handoff boundary.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenFor the GPT-5.6 Sol and Luna evaluations, the versioned profile and its activation policy are frozen: no prompt, state, routing, check catalog, default, or repair policy is revised using target-model evaluation outcomes.
“For the GPT-5.6Sol and Luna evaluations, the versioned profile and its activation policy are frozen: no prompt, state, routing, check catalog, default, or repair policy is revised using target-model evaluation outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone givenStateM does not make every model universally stronger.
“StateM does not make every model universally stronger, and one runbook does not fit every workflow.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationown dataThe BusinessBench iterations show why procedural memory must be selective.
“The BusinessBench iterations show why this memory must be selective.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningStateM does not make untrusted hook code safe.
“StateM does not make untrusted hook code safe; sandboxing and permission control remain host responsibilities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBusinessBench yields the task-side lesson that frozen aggregate generalization is positive but modest, and the largest gains occur where control is sparse and matched to an explicit execution boundary.
“BusinessBench yields the corresponding task-side lesson: frozen aggregate generalization is positive but modest, and the largest gains occur where control is sparse and matched to an explicit execution boundary.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningFailure traces provide experience.
“Failure traces provide experience; deciding which abstraction deserves to become durable control is itself a difficult reasoning task.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone givenAn active procedure may not be completed.
“Relevant knowledge may be unavailable at the decision point; a lesson from prior experience may not be retained or activated; or an active procedure may not be completed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenStateM is an agent-native control layer that externalizes mutable execution state, refreshes phase-local context, and checks consequential transitions while preserving the unified reasoning loop of a general-purpose CLI agent.
“We introduce StateM, an agent-native control layer that externalizes mutable execution state, refreshes phase-local context, and checks consequential transitions while preserving the unified reasoning loop of a general-purpose CLI agent.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningStateM can prevent a configured requirement from being silently skipped, but it cannot detect a missing requirement that neither the runbook nor the agent introduces.
“Similarly, StateM can prevent a configured requirement from being silently skipped, but it cannot detect a missing requirement that neither the runbook nor the agent introduces.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataStateM moves both the quality and cost frontiers on Terminal-Bench 2.1.
“Figure 5 StateM moves both the quality and cost frontiers on Terminal-Bench 2.1”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAcross providers, the runtime and failure-driven development methodology remain reusable, while model-dependent practices must be adapted.
“Across providers, the runtime and failure-driven development methodology remain reusable, while model-dependent practices must be adapted.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenExact runbooks transfer across nearby models.
“Together with the benchmark results, this completes the transfer hierarchy: exact runbooks transfer across nearby models, development principles transfer across providers, and control-boundary abstractions transfer across tasks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThe runtime itself must be cheap to modify.
“The experiments above highlight a practical requirement that is easy to miss when viewing a harness only as a fixed workflow: the runtime itself must be cheap to modify.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningHarness scaling requires a runtime that is both agent-native and enforceable.
“Harness scaling requires a runtime that is both agent-native and enforceable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenWebArena appears to require a still lighter query-state boundary.
“WebArena appears to require a still lighter query-state boundary.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThe agent-native and enforceable features of StateM make harness scaling feasible in efficiency and cost.
“The agent-native and enforceable features of StateM make harness scaling feasible in efficiency and cost.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningStateM provides control points, not a correctness oracle.
“StateM provides control points, not a correctness oracle.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningStateM addresses these operational gaps through state-local context, versioned procedural practices, and checked transitions, respectively.
“StateM addresses these operational gaps through state-local context, versioned procedural practices, and checked transitions, respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe protocol abstains from applying a StateM workflow to attendance-payroll; all 72 treatment-arm runs in that family receive no StateM intervention and are excluded from efficacy aggregates.
“The protocol abstains from applying a StateM workflow to attendance-payroll; all 72 treatment-arm runs in that family receive no StateM intervention and are excluded from efficacy aggregates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenIn long-running work, a single agent can become overconfident in an early task interpretation and continue reasoning inside a context shaped by its own previous decisions.
“In long-running work, a single agent can become overconfident in an early task interpretation and continue reasoning inside a context shaped by its own previous decisions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningProfile construction does not use hidden tests, verifier implementations, public solutions, answer artifacts, task hashes, or manually enumerated task identifiers as routing keys.
“It does not use hidden tests, verifier implementations, public solutions, answer artifacts, task hashes, or manually enumerated task identifiers as routing keys.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premiseown dataStateM was built for an operational requirement beyond benchmark accuracy: a long-running agent must preserve its place and obligations as the interaction grows.
“StateM was built for an operational requirement beyond benchmark accuracy: a long-running agent must preserve its place and obligations as the interaction grows.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenHooks execute with the permissions of the surrounding host environment.
“Hooks execute with the permissions of the surrounding host environment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenConventional state-machine and graph-based agent runtimes provide explicit orchestration and strong control, but typically externalize substantial reasoning into manually constructed nodes, edges, and handlers.
“Conventional state-machine and graph-based agent runtimes provide explicit orchestration and strong control, but typically externalize substantial reasoning into manually constructed nodes, edges, and handlers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenModel scaling expands what an agent can do.
“Model scaling expands what an agent can do; harness scaling helps the system remember what experience has taught it to do without training, and ensures that it actually does so before proceeding.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenThe resulting BusinessBench profile is frozen before the first held-out evaluation.
“The resulting profile is frozen before the first held-out evaluation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningControl-boundary abstractions transfer across tasks.
“Together with the benchmark results, this completes the transfer hierarchy: exact runbooks transfer across nearby models, development principles transfer across providers, and control-boundary abstractions transfer across tasks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenPlan tokens are at a higher abstraction level, which is much fewer but critical.
“Plan tokens are at higher abstraction level, which is much fewer but critical.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe stop-hook mechanism reduces premature termination and supports longer unattended runs.
“This mechanism reduces premature termination and supports longer unattended runs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe authors use 88.8% as a score-only reference and plot $574.68 only at its matched submission score.
“We therefore use 88.8% as a score-only reference and plot $574.68only at its matched submission score”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningSandboxing and permission control remain host responsibilities.
“StateM does not make untrusted hook code safe; sandboxing and permission control remain host responsibilities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenOnly the first frozen held-out evaluation is untouched; later results are explicitly post-evaluation validation.
“Only the first frozen held-out evaluation is untouched; later results are explicitly post-evaluation validation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe public GPT-5.5 reference is a model-matched public reference rather than a newly rerun, agent-version-matched A/B control.
“It is a model-matched public reference rather than a newly rerun, agent-version-matched A/B control.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenBusinessBench family sizes are unequal and each instance has one stochastic trajectory per arm.
“BusinessBench family sizes are unequal and each instance has one stochastic trajectory per arm.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The underlying model is capable of solving each local step of a long-horizon task, and failures are due to harness or control issues rather than model capability.
“Long-horizon agents can fail even when their underlying models can solve the constituent steps.”
“Long-horizon agents often fail in a revealing way: the underlying model appears capable of solving each local step, yet the complete run still fails.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The BusinessBench dataset and its task families are representative of heterogeneous real-world workflows for the purpose of evaluating task-side generalization.
“We also evaluate task-side generalization on BusinessBench (Yang et al., 2026) using Codex with GPT-5.6 Luna.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The reference and StateM runs differ only in the harness, so the observed score differences are attributable to the harness.
“Holding model weights fixed isolates the contribution of the harness.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The public submission records and OpenAI-reported scores are accurate and comparable to the authors' evaluation conditions.
“Rows labeled reference reproduce the corresponding published or publicsubmission result; rows labeled our run report our evaluation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The benchmark tasks and families are representative of the broader task distributions to which the transfer claims generalize.
“Across task distributions, transfer resides in the method for locating and protecting consequential execution boundaries.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The stochastic trajectories are sufficient to estimate performance reliably.
“Each instance has one stochastic trajectory per arm, so family-macro and instance-micro averages answer complementary questions.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The model cost figures reflect the true economic cost of the runs.
“For DeepSeek, final-evaluation expenditure is the realized API charge for producing the reported final-score evidence.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Extended-timeout result is described as both above and matching 88.8%
MinorThe paper says the descriptive DeepSeek aggregate is above the reported 88.8% GPT reference, but later calculates it as 88.76% and says it matches 88.8% when rounded. The stated aggregate is not above the stated reference.
“Extending the timeout only for that task yields a descriptive full-suite aggregate above the reported 88.8% GPT-5.6 Sol max result.”
“Combining those disclosed trials with the 88-task common-core result yields a descriptive full-suite aggregate of 392 + 3 445 = 395 445 = 88.76%, which rounds to 88.8% and matches the separately reported GPT-5.6 Sol max score at one-decimal precision.”
Cites
StateFlow: Enhancing LLM Task-Solving through State-Driven Workflows
Wu, Y., Yue, T., Zhang, S.-K., et al. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.11322 · Cited by 79 · cited 1×
“StateFlow represents problem solving through explicit states and transitions, demonstrating that state-driven execution can improve task grounding and failure recovery (Wu et al., 2024).”
Adapting the Interface, Not the Model: Runtime Harness Adaptation for Deterministic LLM AgentsPreprint
Xu, T.-S., Wen, H., & Li, M. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.22166 · Cited by 30 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Life-Harness converts recurring failures into reusable interventions over environment contracts, procedural skills, action realization, and trajectory regulation, then freezes the resulting harness for held-out evaluation (Xu et al., 2026).”
$τ$-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domains
Yao, S., Shinn, N., Razavi, P., & Narasimhan, K. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.12045 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Wang, J., & Duan, Z. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.03801 · Cited by 8 · cited 1× · see citing works
“LangGraph and related durable workflow systems provide persistent state, conditional edges, checkpointing, interruption, and human-in-the-loop recovery (Wang and Duan, 2024).”
SWE-Bench Pro: Can AI Agents Solve Long-Horizon Software Engineering Tasks?
Deng, X., Da, J., Pan, E., He, Y. Y., Ide, C., Garg, K., Lauffer, N., Park, A., Pasari, N., Rane, C., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.16941 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citation$τ^2$-Bench: Evaluating Conversational Agents in a Dual-Control Environment
Barres, V., Dong, H., Ray, S., Si, X., & Narasimhan, K. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.07982 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Agentic Harness Engineering: Observability-Driven Automatic Evolution of Coding-Agent Harnesses
Lin, J., Liu, S., Pan, C., Lin, L., Dou, S., Xi, Z., Huang, X., Yan, H., Han, Z., Gui, T., et al. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.25850 · Cited by 1 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Agentic Harness Engineering uses execution observability to evolve coding-agent tools, middleware, prompts, and memory from trajectory feedback (Lin et al., 2026; Gu, 2026).”
From Model Scaling to System Scaling: Scaling the Harness in Agentic AIPreprint
Gu, S. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.26112 · Cited by 1 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Agentic Harness Engineering uses execution observability to evolve coding-agent tools, middleware, prompts, and memory from trajectory feedback (Lin et al., 2026; Gu, 2026).”
Terminal-Bench: Benchmarking Agents on Hard, Realistic Tasks in Command Line Interfaces
Merrill, M. A., Shaw, A. G., Carlini, N., Li, B., Raj, H., Bercovich, I., Shi, L., Shin, J. Y., Walshe, T., Buchanan, E. K., et al. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.11868 · cited 1×
“Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Merrill et al., 2026) contains 89 tasks.”
InfluentialSelf-citationBetter Harnesses, Smaller Models: Building 90% Cheaper Agents via Automated Harness Adaptation
Yang, C., Zhao, X., Wu, T., & Kästner, C. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.08938 · cited 10×
“In BusinessBench, GPT-5 The frozen one-shot evaluation tests whether that abstraction survives on held-out tasks.”
InfluentialSelf-Harness: Harnesses That Improve Themselves
Zhang, H., Zhang, S., Li, K., Zhang, C., Chen, Y., Zhang, Y., Bai, L., & Hu, S. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.09498 · cited 1×
“Self-Harness lets an agent mine its weaknesses, propose harness modifications, and promote them through regression-aware validation (Zhang et al., 2026).”
In-Context Prompting Obsoletes Agent Orchestration for Procedural Tasks
Dennis, S., Diamond, M., Patil, R., Shabahang, K., & Guo, H. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.27891 · cited 1×
“Recent evidence finds settings in which a strong model given the full procedure in context outperforms a more heavily orchestrated version of the same procedure (Dennis et al., 2026).”
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Scaling Trajectories for Complex Tasks through Recursive Self-Rewrite
Li, Z.-X., Shi, Y.-C., Li, Z.-Z., et al. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.02826 · Cited by 3
“6 Luna and DeepSeek-V4 Flash [26].”
Influential
- Authors
- Qin, Z., Lu, Y., Wang, Z. A., & Wang, K.
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2026
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2608.15089
- OpenAlex
- W7203674623
- Semantic Scholar
- 8da9594606e427b4cc086fe0cbfe5c1fa3a1ff3e
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 12
- Type
- posted content
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Keywords
- long-horizon agents, procedural knowledge, mutable state, GPT-5.5, DeepSeek-V4
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review