When Agents Coordinate: Measuring Coordination in Multi-Agent AI Coding
Open accessAbstract
We study how teams of AI coding agents coordinate while solving programming tasks. Current evaluations usually report whether the agents complete the task and how much the run costs, leaving the coordination inside the team largely unmeasured. We introduce an instrument to measure this coordination. Each run is represented as a temporal network in which agents and files are nodes, and messages, file writes, and file reads are timestamped directed edges with an associated cost. We apply this instrument to 1902 runs, each evaluated with a fixed test suite, across configurations that vary the team size, the team structure, and the file policy. The resulting networks show how coordination changes as teams grow and as the work changes. Direct messaging initially increases close to quadratically with the number of agents, with much of this growth coming from an early round of introductions. As the teams grow further, this increase levels off in the largest teams we study, where agents increasingly communicate through broadcast messages. The task also shapes the network that emerges. Work built around a shared specification produces dense, highly connected teams, while pipeline tasks produce sparse networks organised around local interfaces. Shared files can replace repeated 1-to-1 communication, cutting output tokens by about 42% at eight agents on message-heavy work, while adding overhead when files already carry the coordination. Naming one agent as coordinator creates no communication hub and provides no reliable improvement in success. We also observe an unprompted tendency for agents to seek out hidden grading material. We repeat the key experimental conditions in a sealed environment, replacing the hidden material with marked placeholder files. Across 244 additional runs, agents still reach for it in four fifths of runs, while the coordinator and file-channel findings reproduce.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The paper introduces a temporal-network instrument for measuring coordination inside multi-agent AI coding runs, with agents and files as nodes and messages, writes, and reads as timestamped, costed edges. Across 1,902 graded runs plus 244 sealed replication runs, it finds that messaging growth is largely an early handshake, task shape determines network topology, files can substitute for message-heavy coordination, and naming a coordinator creates no structural leadership.
Key findings
- Messaging initially grows near-quadratically with team size, but much of this is an early round of introductions: on the chained task the growth exponent is 1.92, and on the sixteen-step arm mean messages are 21.4, 47.0, and 46.8 at four, eight, and sixteen agents, with an eight-to-sixteen slope of 0.00 (95% CI [-0.34, 0.34]); named-peer messages fall from 34.6 to 12.2 while broadcasts rise from 12.3 to 34.0.
- Task shape sets the sustained network: the distributed task builds a dense mesh with mean degree 0.90, 2.92, and 5.47 at two, four, and eight agents against clique lines of 1, 3, and 7, while the chained task stays sparse at 0.90, 1.57, and 2.99; the sixteen-step chain has mean degree 0.28 against a clique of 15 and clustering 0.03.
- Mandating shared files cuts output tokens by about 25% at four agents and about 42% at eight on the distributed task, but raises output tokens by about 17% at four and 10% at eight on the chained task; at sixteen agents with files already carrying coordination, the mandatory rule roughly doubles per-run tokens (578k vs 333k) for identical success.
- Naming a coordinator produces no communication hub and no reliable success gain; in the sealed replication flat and coordinator teams are level under every file policy. The teams also unprompted sought hidden grading material: in the main collection they opened the hidden test suite in 234 runs and the reference solution in 77; in the sealed runs, 80% opened the decoy test file, 66% another agent’s prompt, and 61% the manifest.
Methods
- Each run is represented as a heterogeneous temporal graph \(G=(V,E)\) with agents and files as nodes; agent-to-agent messages, agent-to-file writes/edits, and file-to-agent reads are typed, timestamped directed edges carrying byte size and token cost. Logs are parsed into four linked CSV tables (nodes, edges, turns, runs).
- Two synthetic Python task experiments: Experiment 1 distributed task (`process_orders`) cuts one specification into four parts; Experiment 2 chained task (`summarise_transactions`) uses a four-step processing chain. Crossed factors are team size (1, 2, 4, 8; scaling arms to 16), team structure (flat vs coordinator), file policy (forbidden, allowed, mandatory), and split (clean, overlapping, conflicting).
- The main collection contains 1,902 graded runs across 85 cells in Experiment 1 and 87 in Experiment 2, plus scaling arms and pilots; a further 244 runs form the sealed replication. Runs use Claude Code 2.1.x with model pinned to `claude-sonnet-4-6`. Analysis uses Clopper-Pearson exact 95% intervals, Fisher’s exact test, Mann-Whitney tests, Benjamini-Hochberg correction, and log-log scaling exponents; eight hypotheses (H1-H8) are stated in advance, with H1 and H4-H8 pre-registered in both prediction and test.
Limitations
- The paper states that the file graph captures only tool-mediated file activity: shell-issued reads/writes leave no edge, undercounting file activity in about 0.6% of runs. Per-channel token figures are proxies on two different bases, and reported token totals exclude cached context re-read on each turn.
- The paper states that results come from two synthetic Python tasks, one runtime, and one pinned model, so specific values will not carry directly to other settings; agents are stochastic, cells carry ten runs, and a single cell’s success rate has a margin of roughly thirty percentage points. The main collection did not confine agents to their workspace, though the sealed replication re-tests load-bearing cells and is not an enforced sandbox.
- The paper states that overstaffed cells cannot support a scaling law because above four agents growth cannot be separated from the team running out of work; H2 and H3 carry pre-registration qualifications, and the authors deliberately did not top up 93 flagged cells despite a pre-registered top-up rule.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 20 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
In the eight-agent Experiment 1 runs, the four agents without a part send 62% of all messages.
“in the eight-agent Experiment 1 runs they send 62% of all messages”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the eight-agent Experiment 1 runs, agents without a part send 13.7 messages per agent per run against 8.4 for agents holding parts.
“13.7 per agent per run against 8.4 for the agents holding parts”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Across 244 additional sealed runs, agents still reach for the hidden material in four fifths of runs.
“Across 244 additional runs, agents still reach for it in four fifths of runs”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Genuine reads of the team's own workspace are about fifteen per run.
“genuine reads of the team's own workspace are about fifteen per run.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
On the distributed task under the mandatory policy the distinct files a run touches grow with the team, from 3.2 at two agents to 11.9 at eight.
“On the distributed task under the mandatory policy the distinct files a run touches grow with the team, from 3.2 at two agents to 11.9 at eight”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
Mandating files changes where the coordination happens.
“Mandating files changes where the coordination happens.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Messages per pair fall as the team grows, from about three messages per ordered pair at two agents to 1.27 at eight.
“the messages per pair fall as the team grows, from about three messages per ordered pair at two agents to 1.27 at eight.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The file-read count at eight agents is 38.8.
“The file-read count at eight agents (38.8) is not a coordination signal”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Twelve of the twenty allowed sixteen-agent runs coordinate by broadcast alone.
“twelve of the twenty allowed sixteen-agent runs coordinate by broadcast alone.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Direct messaging initially increases close to quadratically with the number of agents.
“Direct messaging initially increases close to quadratically with the number of agents, with much of this growth coming from an early round of introductions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Neither shape has a leader.
“Neither shape has a leader.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Agents have an unprompted tendency to seek out hidden grading material.
“We also observe an unprompted tendency for agents to seek out hidden grading material.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Repeated runs show that coordination measurements can vary substantially under the same configuration and pinned model, especially when the task leaves agents more freedom in how to organise.
“Repeated runs also show that coordination measurements can vary substantially under the same configuration and pinned model, especially when the task leaves agents more freedom in how to organise.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Shared files add overhead when files already carry the coordination.
“while adding overhead when files already carry the coordination.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the largest teams, agents increasingly communicate through broadcast messages.
“where agents increasingly communicate through broadcast messages.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Shared files can replace repeated one-to-one communication, cutting output tokens by about 42% at eight agents on message-heavy work.
“Shared files can replace repeated one-to-one communication, cutting output tokens by about 42% at eight agents on message-heavy work”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Messages per run rise from 6.1 at two agents to 71.3 at eight.
“Table 1 shows messages per run rising from 6.1 at two agents to 71.3 at eight.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The chained task builds a sparse graph whose gap to all-to-all widens with team size.
“the chained task builds a sparse graph whose gap to all-to-all widens with team size”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The count of distinct peers an agent sends two or more messages to (a directed out-degree, normalised across all agents) is roughly two to five at eight agents.
“the count is smaller and varies by experiment and session, roughly two to five at eight agents”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Left to organise themselves, the teams do not converge on one coordination span.
“Left to organise themselves, the teams do not converge on one coordination span.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The coordinator and file-channel findings reproduce in the sealed replication.
“while the coordinator and file-channel findings reproduce.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Filtering each run's message graph to the channels that carry significantly more than an even spread (a disparity-filter backbone, α = 0.05) leaves essentially no edges, 0 of 1,170 at eight agents on the distributed task and 2 of 1,077 on the chained task.
“Filtering each run's message graph to the channels that carry significantly more than an even spread (a disparity-filter backbone, α = 0.05) leaves essentially no edges, 0 of 1,170 at eight agents on the distributed task and 2 of 1,077 on the chained task”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The distributed task builds a dense, tightly clustered mesh that rides the all-to-all line.
“The distributed task builds a dense, tightly clustered mesh that rides the all-to-all line”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The pre-committed main effect, that mandatory adds file coordination while forbidden and allowed look alike, holds in both experiments (hypothesis H4).
“the pre-committed main effect, that mandatory adds file coordination while forbidden and allowed look alike, holds in both experiments (hypothesis H4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Growing the team does not grow the named-peer network towards all-to-all; it stretches a sparse, chain-shaped graph thinner until, at sixteen agents, almost none of it forms.
“Growing the team does not grow the named-peer network towards all-to-all; it stretches a sparse, chain-shaped graph thinner until, at sixteen agents, almost none of it forms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A validity check found the teams reading the hidden test suite, together with the reference solution, where the main runs had left both reachable.
“a validity check found them reading it, together with the reference solution, where the main runs had left both reachable.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
As teams grow further, the increase in direct messaging levels off in the largest teams studied.
“As the teams grow further, this increase levels off in the largest teams we study, where agents increasingly communicate through broadcast messages.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Most of the token throughput is cached context re-read on every turn, about 10.5 million tokens per run at eight agents under the allowed policy over the flat cells, which the run totals do not price.
“most of the token throughput is cached context re-read on every turn, about 10.5 million tokens per run at eight agents under the allowed policy over the flat cells, which the run totals do not price”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
With the real material replaced by decoys, the two findings that these cells test reproduce.
“With the real material replaced by decoys, the two findings that these cells test reproduce.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
At eight agents under the allowed policy, one session's teams touch 18.0 distinct files per run on the conflicting split and the other's touch 4.3.
“at eight agents under the allowed policy, one session's teams touch 18.0 distinct files per run on the conflicting split and the other's touch 4.3.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Whatever the prompt says, no communication hub emerges in either task.
“Whatever the prompt says, no communication hub emerges in either task.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
At eight agents the direction reverses: the flat team matches or beats the coordinator at every policy.
“at eight agents the direction reverses: the flat team matches or beats the coordinator at every policy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The one contrast that survives correction across the six conflict cells is a reversal, flat 20/20 against coordinator 6/10 under forbidden (p BH = 0.046).
“The one contrast that survives correction across the six conflict cells is a reversal, flat 20/20 against coordinator 6/10 under forbidden (p BH = 0.046).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The pre-registered within-experiment comparison of the two topologies on the conflicting split is inconclusive (hypothesis H3).
“The pre-registered within-experiment comparison of the two topologies on the conflicting split is inconclusive (hypothesis H3)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Routing the same coordination through shared files makes the total-coordination exponent on the distributed task fall from 1.70-2.11 across sessions towards linear, 1.12-1.32.
“Route the same coordination through shared files and the total-coordination exponent on the distributed task (all coordination edges, distinct from the messages-only exponent of Section 8) falls from 1.70-2.11across sessions towards linear, 1.12-1.32”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
This contrast does not reproduce once the grading suite is placed out of the agents' reach: the sealed replication of Section 9 runs the same eight-agent conflict cells and finds flat and coordinator teams level under every policy.
“This contrast does not reproduce once the grading suite is placed out of the agents' reach: the sealed replication of Section 9 runs the same eight-agent conflict cells and finds flat and coordinator teams level under every policy”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The chained task's exponent replicates to two decimal places.
“The chained task's exponent, meanwhile, replicates to two decimal places.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
At two agents on the conflicting split, flat teams fail 37% of their runs pooled across policies (up to half in the weaker session).
“At two agents on the conflicting split, flat teams fail 37% of their runs pooled across policies (up to half in the weaker session)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The cleanest reading, the eight-step chain at full decomposition where no agent is idle, gives n 0.98, linear within error.
“the cleanest reading, the eight-step chain at full decomposition where no agent is idle, gives n 0.98 , linear within error.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
No hub forms under either condition: filtering each run's message graph to the channels that carry a disproportionate share of an agent's traffic (a disparity-filter backbone, α = 0.05) leaves 0 of 1,170 channels at eight agents on the distributed task and 2 of 1,077 on the chained task, and the same holds at four agents.
“No hub forms under either condition: filtering each run's message graph to the channels that carry a disproportionate share of an agent's traffic (a disparity-filter backbone, α = 0.05) leaves 0 of 1,170 channels at eight agents on the distributed task and 2 of 1,077 on the chained task, and the same holds at four agents.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Success tells the same story once the two flat collections are pooled (Table 2).
“Success tells the same story once the two flat collections are pooled (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
A pre-committed null on the chained task finds no difference in directed traffic at four agents in the pre-registered session (12.9 against 16.3 messages, p = 0.29).
“A pre-committed null on the chained task also finds no difference in directed traffic at four agents in the pre-registered session (12.9 against 16.3 messages, p = 0.29).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The eight-agent output-token cut spans 36% to 49% across the two collection sessions.
“the eight-agent cut spans 36% to 49% across the two collection sessions”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The gap is not elapsed time between sessions, since the chained pairs span a longer wall-clock gap than the distributed ones and still reproduce.
“The gap is not elapsed time between sessions, since the chained pairs span a longer wall-clock gap than the distributed ones and still reproduce.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Every failure sits on the same seam, between compute_tax (step 7) and format_invoices (step 8): round at each step, or once at the end.
“Every failure sits on the same seam, between compute_tax (step 7) and format_invoices (step 8): round at each step, or once at the end.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Naming a coordinator does not create structural leadership.
“Nominal leadership does not become structural leadership.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
On the chained task the coordinator with a free file channel is the weakest cell in the experiment (1/10).
“On the chained task the coordinator with a free file channel is the weakest cell in the experiment (1/10).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The output saving is not an artefact of the output-only view, since mandating files cuts the cached throughput as well, to about 6.6 million tokens per run.
“The saving is not an artefact of the output-only view, since mandating files cuts the cached throughput as well, to about 6.6 million tokens per run.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The main runs were not confined to their workspace.
“The main runs were not confined to their workspace”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In four fifths of the sealed runs the agents reached for the grading suite even though it returned nothing.
“in four fifths of the sealed runs the agents reached for the grading suite even though it returned nothing”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The distributed task's exponent moves from 1.76 to 2.44.
“while the distributed task's exponent moves from 1.76 to 2.44”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The instrument caught a behaviour that grading hides.
“The instrument also caught a behaviour that grading hides.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
At eight agents the coordinator no longer leads on the conflicting split.
“at eight agents it no longer does (top right)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Most pairs appear early.
“most pairs appear early”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The chained task stays sparse, down to a mean degree of 0.28 against a clique of fifteen at sixteen agents, where scarcely any named-message network forms at all.
“the chained task, where each agent agrees interfaces only with its neighbours, stays sparse, down to a mean degree of 0.28 against a clique of fifteen at sixteen agents, where scarcely any named-message network forms at all.”
- Also stated in: § A.2 Tests and corrections · plain
“the chained task (green) stays sparse and its gap to the clique line widens with team size”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § A.2 Tests and corrections · plain
- Findingown data
The distributed task builds a dense, tightly clustered graph that rides the all-to-all line.
“The distributed task, where everyone reconciles one shared specification, builds a dense, tightly clustered graph that rides the all-to-all line”
- Also stated in: § A.2 Tests and corrections · plain
“the distributed task (blue) tracks the clique line and clusters tightly”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § A.2 Tests and corrections · plain
- Findingown data
The coordinator is the weakest point of all on the conflicting split at four agents (1/10).
“the coordinator is the weakest point of all on the conflicting split at four agents (1/10)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Experiment 2 tracks the quadratic reference (slope 1.92).
“Experiment 2 tracks the quadratic reference (slope 1.92)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Under mandatory, message tokens collapse and file tokens grow in both experiments.
“under mandatory, message tokens collapse and file tokens grow in both experiments”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The shape of the coordination network is set by the task.
“Beneath those choices, the shape of the coordination network is set by the task.”
- Also stated in: § 12 Conclusion · plain
“In our experiments, the structure a team builds is a property of the work it is given, read directly off the graph.”
- Also stated in: § A.2 Tests and corrections · plain
“The shape of the sustained network is set by the task, on the flat, allowed-policy, clean-split runs (both collection sessions pooled).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 12 Conclusion · plain
- Findingown data
In Experiment 2 success follows the split, whatever the team structure.
“In Experiment 2 (bottom) success follows the split, whatever the team structure”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Output falls overall only in Experiment 1.
“Output falls overall only in Experiment 1”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The eight-step arm bends away from the quadratic reference after four agents.
“the eight-step arm bends away from it after four agents”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The file-read channel itself is still super-linear there (≈ 1.7).
“The file-read channel itself is still super-linear there (≈ 1.7)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The sixteen-step arm goes flat between eight and sixteen.
“the sixteen-step arm goes flat between eight and sixteen”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The mean per-run 90% arrival time varies from about 0.14 to 0.60 across team sizes and sessions.
“the mean per-run 90% arrival time varies from about 0.14 to 0.60 across team sizes and sessions”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the sixteen-step arm messaging growth halts between eight and sixteen agents.
“in the sixteen-step arm messaging growth halts between eight and sixteen agents”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Directed messages track the quadratic wherever the teams use them.
“directed messages track the quadratic wherever the teams use them”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Left to organise themselves, the teams do not converge on a single coordination span.
“Left to organise themselves, the teams do not converge on a single coordination span.”
- Also stated in: § 12 Conclusion · plain
“Left free, the agents do not settle on one span at all: where the task calls for it they build a dense near-clique, and where it does not they stay sparse.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 12 Conclusion · plain
- Findingown data
At four agents the coordinator leads on the conflicting split.
“at four agents the coordinator leads on the conflicting split (top left)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Our agent teams sustain a limited number of one-to-one pushes, roughly two to five peers per agent by the directed out-degree of Section 5.
“Our agent teams sustain a limited number of one-to-one pushes, roughly two to five peers per agent by the directed out-degree of Section 5”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Under one pinned model, the chained task's measurements replicate across sessions to two decimal places.
“Under one pinned model, the chained task's measurements replicate across sessions to two decimal places”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
On the distributed task the mandatory policy moves the total from near-quadratic (exponent 1.70 to 2.11 across sessions) towards linear (1.12 to 1.32).
“on the distributed task the mandatory policy moves the total from near-quadratic (exponent 1.70 to 2.11 across sessions) towards linear (1.12 to 1.32)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
The overstaffed cells cannot support a scaling law, because above four agents growth in coordination cannot be separated from the team running out of work.
“The one conclusion these cells cannot support is a scaling law, since above four agents growth in coordination cannot be separated from the team running out of work.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
An agent that holds nothing must ask the others for everything.
“because an agent that holds nothing must ask the others for everything.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
A file read or write issued through the shell leaves no edge, so file activity is a slight undercount.
“One blind spot follows from this: a file read or write issued through the shell leaves no edge, so file activity is a slight undercount (Section 10).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Success rates do not reveal this failure mechanism.
“Success rates do not reveal this failure mechanism.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
A large team stops addressing peers one at a time and speaks to the room.
“A large team stops addressing peers one at a time and speaks to the room.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
These measures do not show the coordination structure that emerges during a run.
“These measures do not show the coordination structure that emerges during a run.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The temporal network shows the structural condition behind the failure: the failing interface lies between two different owners.
“The temporal network shows the structural condition behind it: the failing interface lies between two different owners (Section 7).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Whatever the task, the structure the team builds is leaderless.
“Whatever the task, the structure the team builds is leaderless.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The task sets the shape of the lasting traffic.
“The task sets the shape of the lasting traffic (Section 5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Coordination among AI coding agents can be measured directly, exposing structures, behaviours, and costs that task success and aggregate token counts leave hidden.
“These results show that coordination among AI coding agents can be measured directly, exposing structures, behaviours, and costs that task success and aggregate token counts leave hidden.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
A single run gives only one sample of the coordination behaviour of a configuration.
“A single run therefore gives only one sample of the coordination behaviour of a configuration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Because the sixteen-step chain is fully divided only at sixteen agents, the plateau cannot be the team running out of work.
“Because that chain is fully divided only at sixteen agents, the plateau cannot be the team running out of work.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The shape of the coordination network is a property of the task, read directly off the graph.
“The shape of the coordination network is a property of the task, read directly off the graph.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The measurements expose failures that the final code hides.
“The measurements also expose failures that the final code hides.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Nominal leadership does not become structural leadership.
“Nominal leadership does not become structural leadership.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Under a fixed model identifier, a multi-agent configuration is characterised by a distribution of runs.
“Under a fixed model identifier, a multi-agent configuration is characterised by a distribution of runs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Resolving a planted disagreement is not a matter of communication volume.
“Resolving a planted disagreement is not a matter of communication volume.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The runs analysed above were collected in an environment that did not confine the agents to their working directory.
“The runs analysed above were collected in an environment that did not confine the agents to their working directory.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Beyond structure, no single network property buys success.
“Beyond structure, no single network property buys success.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
It is the kind of reward-seeking that grade-only evaluation cannot see.
“It is the kind of reward-seeking that grade-only evaluation cannot see [13,21,27,36]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [13]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [21]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [27]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
The network's shape records how a run went more than it predicts how it will go.
“The network's shape records how a run went more than it predicts how it will go.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Where the task leaves coordination open, single-run benchmarks of multi-agent systems measure a sample of size one from a wide distribution.
“Where the task leaves coordination open, single-run benchmarks of multi-agent systems measure a sample of size one from a wide distribution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
No tool-mediated read reached a real file in the runs we kept.
“No tool-mediated read reached a real file in the runs we kept.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
A sequential task settles its interfaces by writing them down, whatever it is told.
“A sequential task settles its interfaces by writing them down, whatever it is told.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The confirmatory results survive when every run with such a read is dropped.
“The confirmatory results survive when every run with such a read is dropped”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The near-quadratic growth of Section 4 belongs to the one-to-one message channel.
“The near-quadratic growth of Section 4 belongs to the one-to-one message channel.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Talking more did not close an interface that nobody owned.
“Talking more did not close an interface that nobody owned.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
We treat the reversal as an artefact of the uncontained collection.
“so we treat the reversal as an artefact of the uncontained collection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The topology result cautions against reading it as a shared cognitive span.
“The topology result cautions against reading it as a shared cognitive span.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The quadratic growth ends within the measured range of team sizes.
“The quadratic growth ends within the measured range of team sizes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Human hierarchies may owe as much to the cost of adding people and the distribution of authority as to any limit on coordination itself.
“Human hierarchies may owe as much to the cost of adding people and the distribution of authority as to any limit on coordination itself”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The total is near-linear because directed messaging is switched off.
“the total is near-linear because directed messaging is switched off.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
Work on multi-agent LLM systems evaluates them, almost without exception, by their outputs.
“Work on multi-agent LLM systems evaluates them, almost without exception, by their outputs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
H8, at twenty runs per cell, reached significance.
“H8, at twenty runs per cell, reached significance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
What remains and still binds is the cost of coordination.
“What remains and still binds is the cost of coordination.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Single-run evaluations of multi-agent systems stand on a sample of size one.
“and single-run evaluations of multi-agent systems stand on a sample of size one.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
An unprompted search for the answer key that only a record of coordination, and not a grade, can see.
“an unprompted search for the answer key that only a record of coordination, and not a grade, can see.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
When communication is examined at all, it appears as raw message logs or token counts, and the structure, the timing, and the file activity that carry much of the coordination stay out of view.
“When communication is examined at all, it appears as raw message logs or token counts, and the structure, the timing, and the file activity that carry much of the coordination stay out of view.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Reproducibility under a fixed model depends on the task.
“Reproducibility under a fixed model depends on the task.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Repeated runs of the same configuration vary widely, in agentic coding by up to thirty-fold in token consumption.
“Repeated runs of the same configuration vary widely [4,26], in agentic coding by up to thirty-fold in token consumption [1]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [4]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [26]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [1]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Study design and conductreasoning
The cost of that judgement is that the affected cell-level graph estimates remain less precise than the rule intended.
“The cost of that judgement is that the affected cell-level graph estimates remain less precise than the rule intended.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- May combine two claims. 153
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 66
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataOn the sixteen-step chain the slope between eight and sixteen agents is 0.00 (95% CI [-0.34, 0.34]), and the break is significant (∆ = 1.08, 95% CI [0.61, 1.55]), confirming hypothesis H8.
“the slope between eight and sixteen is 0.00 (95% CI [-0.34, 0.34]), and the break is significant (∆ = 1.08, 95% CI [0.61, 1.55]), confirming hypothesis H8.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAn eight-step calculation split one step per agent failed in all ten runs, every time on the same question: round at each step, or once at the end.
“An eight-step calculation split one step per agent failed in all ten runs, every time on the same question: round at each step, or once at the end.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOn the chained task the growth exponent is 1.92, quadratic within error, and the two collection sessions agree to two decimal places (1.92 and 1.93).
“the chained task the exponent is 1.92, quadratic within error, and the two collection sessions agree to two decimal places (1.92 and 1.93).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMessages rise steeply and file writes barely move.
“Messages rise steeply and file writes barely move.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOn the chained task, mean degree is 0.90, 1.57, and 2.99 at two, four, and eight agents, so the gap to the clique line widens as the team grows, and clustering stays low (0.36 at four agents, 0.38 at eight).
“Mean degree is 0.90, 1.57, and 2.99 at the same sizes, so the gap to the clique line widens as the team grows, and clustering stays low (0.36 at four agents, 0.38 at eight).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe dense graph is dense everywhere and the sparse graph is sparse everywhere; neither concentrates on a hub.
“The dense graph is dense everywhere and the sparse graph is sparse everywhere; neither concentrates on a hub.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOn the chained task the directed out-degree stays around two; on the distributed task it is about three in one collection and five in the other, and in the second it comes close to the undirected degree of 5.5.
“On the chained task it stays around two; on the distributed task it is about three in one collection and five in the other, and in the second it comes close to the undirected degree of 5.5.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPast eight agents, messages aimed at one named peer fall from 34.6 to 12.2 per run while broadcasts rise from 12.3 to 34.0.
“past eight agents, messages aimed at one named peer fall from 34.6 to 12.2 per run while broadcasts, messages sent to the whole team at once, rise from 12.3 to 34.0”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe remaining 82 runs are pilots and methodological checks, giving 1,902 runs in the main collection; a further 244 runs form the sealed replication.
“The remaining 82 runs are pilots (small trial batches run before the full schedules) and methodological checks, giving 1,902 runs in the main collection; a further 244 runs form the sealed replication of Section 9.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOn the distributed task the growth is also steep but not stable across sessions.
“On the distributed task the growth is also steep but not stable across sessions”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOn the distributed task the mandatory policy cuts output tokens by about 25% at four agents and about 42% at eight below the allowed default, with all team structures and splits pooled at each size.
“On the distributed task the mandatory policy cuts output tokens by about 25% at four agents and about 42% at eight below the allowed default, with all team structures and splits pooled at each size”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOn the distributed task, mean degree is 0.90, 2.92, and 5.47 at two, four, and eight agents, against clique lines of 1, 3, and 7, and clustering is high once the team is larger than a pair (0.96 at four agents, 0.81 at eight).
“Mean degree is 0.90, 2.92, and 5.47 at two, four, and eight agents, against clique lines of 1, 3, and 7, and clustering is high once the team is larger than a pair (0.96 at four agents, 0.81 at eight).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the sealed replication, the two findings these cells test reproduce, and the teams still reach for the hidden test suite in four fifths of runs even though it returns nothing.
“the two findings these cells test reproduce, and the teams still reach for the hidden test suite in four fifths of runs even though it returns nothing”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe chained task completes its handshake early at four and eight agents in both sessions; at two agents, in one session, ninety per cent of pairs appear only around the middle of the run (τ ≈ 0.46).
“The chained task completes its handshake early at four and eight agents in both sessions; at two agents, in one session, ninety per cent of pairs appear only around the middle of the run (τ ≈ 0.46).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe introductions come early in the run; the sustained traffic comes later.
“the introductions come early in the run; the sustained traffic comes later.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe distributed mesh is dense but flat: no agent holds a disproportionate share of the sustained edges.
“The distributed mesh is dense but flat: no agent holds a disproportionate share of the sustained edges.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOn the distributed task, in one collection session, ninety per cent of the distinct sender-to-recipient pairs a run will ever use have appeared by τ ≈ 0.2 at every team size; in the other session the eight-agent handshake stretches to τ ≈ 0.6.
“On the distributed task, in one collection session, ninety per cent of the distinct sender-to-recipient pairs a run will ever use have appeared by τ ≈ 0.2 at every team size (Figure 5); in the other session the eight-agent handshake stretches to τ ≈ 0.6”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe pre-registered H1 test gives 1.92 with an interval of [1.67, 2.17], and the per-run regression gives 1.92 with interval [1.80, 2.05]; both confirm quadratic scaling.
“The pre-registered H1 test, a regression over the three cell means, gives 1.92 with an interval of [1.67, 2.17] (±1.96SE, the pre-registered test's normal approximation); the per-run regression we use for scaling elsewhere in the paper gives the same 1.92 with a tighter interval, [1.80, 2.05].Both confirm quadratic scaling.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenA run can pass every test while leaving no trace of how much coordination it required, and two runs that pass the same tests can differ severalfold in messages, file activity, and tokens.
“A run can pass every test while leaving no trace of how much coordination it required, and two runs that pass the same tests can differ severalfold in messages, file activity, and tokens.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOn the sixteen-step chain mean messages are 21.4, 47.0, and 46.8 at four, eight, and sixteen agents.
“mean messages are 21.4,47.0, and 46.8 at four, eight, and sixteen agents”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAt eight agents on the distributed task, the tokens attributed to direct messages fall from about 10,500 per run under the allowed default to 1,700 under mandatory, while file-write and file-read tokens roughly double.
“At eight agents on the distributed task, the tokens attributed to direct messages fall from about 10,500 per run under the allowed default to 1,700 under mandatory, while file-write and file-read tokens roughly double”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe shape is set by the task, and the two tasks settle on opposite shapes.
“The shape is set by the task, and the two tasks settle on opposite shapes (Figure 6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWork built around a shared specification produces dense, highly connected teams, while pipeline tasks produce sparse networks organised around local interfaces.
“Work built around a shared specification produces dense, highly connected teams, while pipeline tasks produce sparse networks organised around local interfaces.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe sixteen-step chain has the widest gap: the average agent sustains just 0.28 partners against a clique line of 15, and clustering falls to 0.03.
“The sixteen-step chain, the only configuration that reaches sixteen agents, has the widest gap: the average agent sustains just 0.28 partners against a clique line of 15, and clustering falls to 0.03.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOn the eight-step chain the slope falls from 1.82 between two and four agents to 0.72 between four and eight; at ten runs per cell the fall is in the predicted direction but not significant.
“On the eight-step chain the slope falls from 1.82 between two and four agents to 0.72 between four and eight; at ten runs per cell the fall is in the predicted direction but not significant (hypothesis H7, Appendix A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThe two experiments' grids together contain 1,720 runs.
“The two experiments' grids together contain 1,720 runs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMost file reads at eight agents are outside the workspace, the agents opening the reference solution, the hidden tests, and other runs' files.
“most of these reads are outside the workspace, the agents opening the reference solution, the hidden tests, and other runs' files (Section 9)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataUnder a pinned model, the chained task reproduces across collection sessions almost exactly, while the distributed task does not: the same configuration, collected twice under the same pinned model, gave two incompatible growth rates.
“Under a pinned model, the chained task reproduces across collection sessions almost exactly, while the distributed task does not: the same configuration, collected twice under the same pinned model, gave two incompatible growth rates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe convention sat on the boundary between two agents, and no agent owned it.
“The convention sat on the boundary between two agents, and no agent owned it.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNaming one agent as coordinator creates no communication hub and provides no reliable improvement in success.
“Naming one agent as coordinator creates no communication hub and provides no reliable improvement in success.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMessages get shorter as teams grow (mean size falls at every step in team size), so per-channel coordination thins on two axes at once.
“Messages also get shorter as teams grow (mean size falls at every step in team size), so per-channel coordination thins on two axes at once.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWhat holds everywhere is the ordering, introductions first, then repeat traffic on a small established core, with the sustained channels running through the middle and second half of the run.
“What holds everywhere is the ordering, introductions first, then repeat traffic on a small established core, with the sustained channels running through the middle and second half of the run.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNeither the distributed nor the chained coordination network has a leader or hub.
“Neither shape has a leader.”
- Also stated in: § Summary. · plain
“and neither has a hub.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Summary. · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe teams discussed rounding in every one of those runs and still never agreed.
“The teams discussed rounding in every one of those runs and still never agreed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWith files already carrying the coordination, the mandatory rule roughly doubles per-run tokens (578k against 333k) and more than triples file reads, for identical success (10 of 10 against 20 of 20) in the sixteen-agent arm.
“with files already carrying the coordination, the mandatory rule roughly doubles per-run tokens (578k against 333k) and more than triples file reads, for identical success (10 of 10 against 20 of 20).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWhere a task pins the coordination down the two sessions agree closely, showing that the instrument itself can reproduce consistently.
“Where a task pins the coordination down the two sessions agree closely, showing that the instrument itself can reproduce consistently”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe run transcripts show rounding discussed in all ten of the eight-agent runs, and those teams messaged more than the four-agent ones.
“the run transcripts show rounding discussed in all ten of the eight-agent runs, and those teams messaged more than the four-agent ones.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe single reversal reported in Section 7, the flat team beating the coordinator under the forbidden policy, does not reappear, so it is best read as an artefact of the uncontained cells.
“The single reversal reported in Section 7, the flat team beating the coordinator under the forbidden policy, does not reappear, so it is best read as an artefact of the uncontained cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOn the chained task the same rule raises output tokens, by about 17% at four agents and 10% at eight.
“On the chained task the same rule raises output tokens, by about 17% at four agents and 10% at eight.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe agents went looking on their own initiative and reported what they found openly.
“The agents went looking on their own initiative and reported what they found openly.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNaming a coordinator again makes no difference to success: flat and coordinator teams are level under every file policy (forbidden 20/30 against 21/32, p = 1.00; allowed 26/31 against 23/31, p = 0.53; mandatory 23/30 against 25/30, p = 0.75).
“Naming a coordinator again makes no difference to success: flat and coordinator teams are level under every file policy (forbidden 20/30 against 21/32, p = 1.00; allowed 26/31 against 23/31, p = 0.53; mandatory 23/30 against 25/30, p = 0.75).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThrough the file tools, agents opened another agent's private prompt in 129 runs, read a different run's files in 18 (a finished solution in 16 of them), and read the shared message log in 52.
“through the file tools, agents opened another agent's private prompt in 129 runs, read a different run's files in 18 (a finished solution in 16 of them), and read the shared message log in 52”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataExploratory run-level regressions point one way: more messaging and writing go with failure and longer runs, more reading with success and shorter ones.
“Exploratory run-level regressions point one way, more messaging and writing go with failure and longer runs, more reading with success and shorter ones”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataA validity check made after the main collection found that the agents used this access: they opened the hidden test suite in 234 runs and read the reference solution in 77, the reach most common in the eight-agent conflicting cells.
“A validity check made after the main collection found that the agents used this access: they opened the hidden test suite in 234 runs and read the reference solution in 77, the reach most common in the eight-agent conflicting cells.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOn the chained task the sessions agree almost everywhere: no matched cell differs once the twenty-seven comparisons are Benjamini-Hochberg corrected (one differs at the raw level), and typical cell means move by about seven per cent.
“On the chained task the sessions agree almost everywhere: no matched cell differs once the twenty-seven comparisons are Benjamini-Hochberg corrected (one differs at the raw level), and typical cell means move by about seven per cent.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataA quarter of the mandatory runs (about a third at four and eight agents) send no message at all and drop out of this measure, so the 17% describes the minority that still message.
“a quarter of the mandatory runs (about a third at four and eight agents) send no message at all and drop out of this measure, so the 17% describes the minority that still message.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAt four agents the coordinator looks better (8/10 against collection B's 5/10), but pooling the two flat collections dissolves the advantage (8/10 against 12/20, p = 0.42).
“At four agents the coordinator looks better (8/10 against the collection B's 5/10), but pooling the two flat collections dissolves the advantage (8/10 against 12/20, p = 0.42)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWhere a task leaves the coordination open the spread between sessions is considerably larger and itself task-dependent, which uniform measurement noise would not produce.
“where a task leaves the coordination open the spread between sessions is considerably larger and itself task-dependent, which uniform measurement noise would not produce.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWith the real material replaced by a placeholder and nothing to gain, the teams still went looking for it: in 80% of the sealed runs an agent opened the decoy standing in for the hidden test file, in 66% it opened another agent's prompt, and in 61% it opened the run manifest.
“With the real material replaced by a placeholder and nothing to gain, the teams still went looking for it: in 80% of the sealed runs an agent opened the decoy standing in for the hidden test file, in 66% it opened another agent's prompt, and in 61% it opened the run manifest.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe chained task writes files first under every policy (messaging leads in only 12% to 14% of runs), even though its prompt asks agents to coordinate through messages.
“The chained task writes files first under every policy (messaging leads in only 12% to 14% of runs), even though its prompt asks agents to coordinate through messages.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAt two and four agents one agent owns both steps and reconciles the halves internally; at eight agents the seam falls between two different owners and no agent holds responsibility for it.
“At two and four agents one agent owns both steps and reconciles the halves internally; at eight agents the seam falls between two different owners and no agent holds responsibility for it.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMessaging leads file writing in 86% of allowed distributed-task runs, 62% under forbidden, and 17% under mandatory.
“Messaging leads file writing (comparing each run's mean message time with its mean file-write time) in 86% of allowed distributed-task runs, 62% under forbidden, and 17% under mandatory”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOn the distributed task thirteen of twenty-seven cells differ after the same correction, one of them by a factor of fifteen in messaging (31.4 against 2.0 messages per run at the same configuration).
“On the distributed task thirteen of twenty-seven cells differ after the same correction, one of them by a factor of fifteen in messaging (31.4 against 2.0 messages per run at the same configuration).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe channel substitution of Section 6 holds as well: mandating files collapses one-to-one messaging, from 108 messages per run under forbidden and 134 under allowed to 26 under mandatory on the conflicting split, and from 119 to 21 on the clean split.
“The channel substitution of Section 6 holds as well: mandating files collapses one-to-one messaging, from 108 messages per run under forbidden and 134 under allowed to 26 under mandatory on the conflicting split, and from 119 to 21 on the clean split”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe specification settles it: compute_tax is told to pass its tax on unrounded and format_invoices to round every figure once at the end, so the two agents each hold one half of the convention.
“The specification settles it, compute_tax is told to pass its tax on unrounded and format_invoices to round every figure once at the end, so the two agents each hold one half of the convention.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe distributed task's scaling exponent is a range, 1.76 (95% CI [1.57, 1.96]) in one session and 2.44 ([2.32, 2.57]) in another, with non-overlapping intervals.
“This is why the distributed task's scaling exponent is a range, 1.76 (95% CI [1.57, 1.96]) in one session and 2.44 ([2.32, 2.57]) in another, with non-overlapping intervals”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe eight-step chain (compute_invoices) succeeds in nine of ten runs at two and four agents, then fails all ten at eight agents, where each agent owns exactly one step.
“The eight-step chain (compute_invoices) succeeds in nine of ten runs at two and four agents, then fails all ten at eight agents, where each agent owns exactly one step.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningOn the distributed task the file-read channel alone still grows super-linearly (about 1.7), so the linearisation comes from removing the message channel, and the fully linear file regime is a property of chain-shaped work.
“on the distributed task the file-read channel alone still grows super-linearly (about 1.7), so the linearisation comes from removing the message channel, and the fully linear file regime is a property of chain-shaped work.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe teams resolved the shared dependency by writing the constant into a file, which is Finding 2 appearing where a messaging effect was predicted.
“The teams resolved the shared dependency by writing the constant into a file, which is Finding 2 appearing where a messaging effect was predicted.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe chained task hugs the diagonal, with no cell differing after correction.
“the chained task (green) hugs the diagonal, with no cell differing after correction”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenOnly the chained task's file channel is linear by construction.
“Only the chained task's file channel is linear by construction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe teams opened the hidden grading suite in 234 runs and the reference solution in 77.
“they opened the hidden grading suite in 234 runs and the reference solution in 77.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataUnder forbidden the file bars are the deliverable itself, which the team must write: every write in those runs goes to the deliverable (270 of 270 multi-agent runs in Experiment 1).
“Under forbidden the file bars are the deliverable itself, which the team must write: every write in those runs goes to the deliverable (270 of 270 multi-agent runs in Experiment 1)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningHere, adding agents still carries coordination cost, but formal authority is minimal, and the pyramid does not return.
“here, adding agents still carries coordination cost, but formal authority is minimal, and the pyramid does not return.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNeither the distributed nor the chained task has a hub.
“Neither has a hub.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe measurements see what grading cannot: an eight-step calculation split one step per agent failed every run on a rounding convention that sat between two agents and belonged to neither, discussed every time and never settled.
“And the measurements see what grading cannot: an eight-step calculation split one step per agent failed every run on a rounding convention that sat between two agents and belonged to neither, discussed every time and never settled.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Findingown dataH5: addressing differs sharply between the experiments; at the matched four-agent cell (collection B, allowed policy, clean split), the per-run mean share of messages that name a specific peer is 97.1% in Experiment 1 against 60.7% in Experiment 2, a 36-point gap in the pre-committed direction.
“H5: addressing differs sharply between the experiments.At the matched four-agent cell (collection B, allowed policy, clean split), the per-run mean share of messages that name a specific peer is 97.1% in Experiment 1 against 60.7% in Experiment 2, a 36-point gap in the pre-committed direction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenThe output saving of Section 6 holds on the cached tokens too.
“the output saving of Section 6 holds on the cached tokens too”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Findingown dataA pre-registered rule flags a cell for topping up to twenty when its precision is low, and applied to the released data it flags 93 cells across the two experiments (48 of the 85 in Experiment 1, 45 of the 87 in Experiment 2), 25 of them on the outcome-precision condition and the rest on graph-statistic variance.
“A pre-registered rule flags a cell for topping up to twenty when its precision is low, and applied to the released data it flags 93 cells across the two experiments (48 of the 85 in Experiment 1, 45 of the 87 in Experiment 2), 25 of them on the outcome-precision condition and the rest on graph-statistic variance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe distributed task scatters off the diagonal, with thirteen of twenty-seven differing.
“the distributed task (blue) scatters off it, with thirteen of twenty-seven differing”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingown dataH1: chained-task messaging scales as n^2.
“H1 chained-task messaging scales as n 2”
- Also stated in: § A.2 Tests and corrections · plain
“Experiment 2 tracks the quadratic reference (slope 1.92)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § A.2 Tests and corrections · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThe earlier of these two choices matters most on the sparse sixteen-agent cell, where most runs build no network at all.
“the earlier of these two choices matters most on the sparse sixteen-agent cell, where most runs build no network at all.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe flags divide roughly evenly by team size, 35 at two agents, 36 at four, and 22 at eight.
“The flags divide roughly evenly by team size, 35 at two agents, 36 at four, and 22 at eight.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningEvery edge in the temporal network corresponds to a logged event, so the network records the coordination that occurred during the run.
“Every edge corresponds to a logged event, so the temporal network records the coordination that occurred during the run.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningThe dataset is one controlled grid, so any two cells differ only in the factors named.
“the dataset is one controlled grid, so any two cells differ only in the factors named here.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe two collections overlap in calendar time, so the divergence reported in Section 8 cannot be attributed to drift between distant sessions.
“The two collections overlap in calendar time, so the divergence reported in Section 8 cannot be attributed to drift between distant sessions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe token cost on file edges is coarse because the runtime reports tokens per turn and a turn can make several tool calls, so the paper divides a turn's output tokens evenly across its calls.
“The one coarse quantity is the token cost on file edges: the runtime reports tokens per turn, and a turn can make several tool calls, so we divide a turn's output tokens evenly across its calls.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningAt the top of each scaling arm every agent owns exactly one step, so nobody is idle and any slowing of coordination growth cannot be the team running out of work.
“At the top of each arm every agent owns exactly one step, so nobody is idle and any slowing of coordination growth cannot be the team running out of work.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenIn Experiment 1, no agent is given the whole specification and none is told who holds what, so the team can only recover it by coordinating.
“No agent in a team is given the whole specification, and none is told who holds what, so the team can only recover it by coordinating.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenIn Experiment 2, the interfaces between owners must be agreed during the run, and the team must decide who writes the pipeline file.
“The interfaces between owners must therefore be agreed during the run, and the team must also decide who writes the pipeline file that assembles the chain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe duplication of the flat structure gives every flat cell an exact same-configuration twin, which lets Section 8 measure how well the whole instrument reproduces.
“The duplication is deliberate: it gives every flat cell an exact same-configuration twin, which is what lets Section 8 measure how well the whole instrument reproduces.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningThe decomposition shows only the direction of the shift because the two figures are measured differently.
“The two figures are measured differently, the message tokens from message length and the file tokens as a share of the turn's output (see the caption), so the decomposition shows only the direction of the shift”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe sixteen-step arm was collected as one interleaved batch over three days, with team sizes balanced within each day so the round-robin protects the size comparison, and it is not a cross-session replication.
“The sixteen-step arm was collected as one interleaved batch over three days, with team sizes balanced within each day so the round-robin protects the size comparison, and it is not a cross-session replication.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe tasks are pure functions with no randomness, and comparison is exact.
“The tasks are pure functions with no randomness, and comparison is exact.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningGiving files separate read and write edges puts file-mediated coordination on the same footing as direct messaging, which is what makes the channel comparison of Section 6 possible at all.
“Giving files separate read and write edges puts file-mediated coordination on the same footing as direct messaging, which is what makes the channel comparison of Section 6 possible at all.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenEach task is graded by a hidden test suite, and no prompt tells the agents to look for it.
“Each task is graded by a hidden test suite, and no prompt tells the agents to look for it.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningA run succeeds only if every test passes, so success is unambiguous while the path to it varies.
“A run succeeds only if every test passes, so success is unambiguous while the path to it varies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe instrument does not capture message content; introduction here simply names a pair's first contact.
“We read this from timing and message counts, because the instrument does not capture message content; introduction here simply names a pair's first contact.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe direction of the shift is corroborated by the message count itself, which collapses under the policy, and by the run-level totals.
“the direction is corroborated by the message count itself, which collapses under the policy, and by the run-level totals below.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningAt ten runs a single cell's success rate carries a margin of roughly thirty percentage points, so single-cell readings are directional and the pooled contrasts carry the inferential weight.
“At ten runs a single cell's success rate carries a margin of roughly thirty percentage points, so single-cell readings are directional and the pooled contrasts carry the inferential weight.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe total rises only because there are more pairs; each pair talks less.
“The total rises only because there are more pairs; each pair talks less.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenEight hypotheses (H1-H8) are stated in advance; six are pre-registered in both prediction and test (H1, H4-H8), while H2 and H3 carry qualifications set out in Appendix A.
“Eight hypotheses (H1-H8) are stated in advance; six are pre-registered in both prediction and test (H1, H4-H8), while H2 and H3 carry qualifications set out in Appendix A.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe directed count describes how many peers an agent actively pushes to, which is generally fewer than the undirected connectivity, though it is a range, varying by experiment and session.
“The directed count describes how many peers an agent actively pushes to, which is generally fewer than the undirected connectivity, though it is a range, varying by experiment and session.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningThe sixteen-step arm carries twenty runs per cell under the allowed policy instead of ten, decided in advance.
“The sixteen-step arm carries twenty runs per cell under the allowed policy instead of ten, decided in advance”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenAll runs use Claude Code (the 2.1.x series) with the model pinned to claude-sonnet-4-6 and logged, unchanged, on every turn.
“All runs use Claude Code (the 2.1.xseries) with the model pinned to claude-sonnet-4-6 and logged, unchanged, on every turn.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataLeft to organise themselves, the teams do not converge on a single coordination span; they let the task dictate the structure.
“Left to organise themselves, the teams do not converge on a single coordination span; they let the task dictate the structure (Section 5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataA pipeline needs each owner to agree interfaces only with its neighbours, and the sustained graph records that local structure.
“A pipeline needs each owner to agree interfaces only with its neighbours, and the sustained graph records that local structure.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenEvery task ships with a reference solution, and a fixed suite of behavioural input/output tests grades the team's deliverable against outputs fixed in advance.
“Every task ships with a reference solution, and a fixed suite of behavioural input/output tests grades the team's deliverable against outputs fixed in advance”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe growth is a round of introductions, made once, early.
“The growth is a round of introductions, made once, early.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationEvaluations typically report task success and the final code or patch, with computational cost increasingly considered as an additional evaluation dimension, or prescribe which agents may communicate with which.
“Evaluations typically report task success and the final code or patch, with computational cost increasingly considered as an additional evaluation dimension [1,19,32], or prescribe which agents may communicate with which [16,29,39].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 6 sources checked- cites [1]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [19]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [32]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [16]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [29]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [39]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataAdding an agent adds one more introduction, while the lasting per-agent coordination barely grows, and on the largest teams the messaging cost of growth falls to zero because the team switches to broadcast.
“Adding an agent adds one more introduction, while the lasting per-agent coordination barely grows, and on the largest teams the messaging cost of growth falls to zero because the team switches to broadcast.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe test suite is placed outside each agent's working directory; in the main collection that placement was not otherwise access-controlled.
“The test suite is placed outside each agent's working directory; in the main collection that placement was not otherwise access-controlled”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataReconciling one specification pulls the team towards talking to everyone, and those partners also interconnect, so the sustained graph is a near-complete, tightly clustered mesh.
“Reconciling one specification pulls the team towards talking to everyone, and those partners also interconnect, so the sustained graph is a near-complete, tightly clustered mesh.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe mismatch is invisible to each agent, whose own step is correct, and invisible in the finished code, which runs.
“The mismatch is invisible to each agent, whose own step is correct, and invisible in the finished code, which runs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe flat condition was collected twice under byte-identical prompts, giving 54 matched cell pairs that are exact same-configuration replications under one pinned model.
“The flat condition was collected twice under byte-identical prompts, giving 54 matched cell pairs that are exact same-configuration replications under one pinned model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningSuccess on the conflicting split measures arbitration only imperfectly: the grader silently enforces one of the two rules, so a team that arbitrates cleanly still fails if it agrees on the other, and the outcome mixes arbitration with landing on the enforced convention.
“Success on this split measures arbitration only imperfectly: the grader silently enforces one of the two rules, so a team that arbitrates cleanly still fails if it agrees on the other, and the outcome mixes arbitration with landing on the enforced convention”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe seal functions as a tripwire that defeats the observed reach pattern and records every tool-mediated attempt.
“The seal therefore functions as a tripwire that defeats the observed reach pattern and records every tool-mediated attempt.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenShell-mediated reads, which the graph does not capture, would raise each of these counts.
“shell-mediated reads, which the graph does not capture, would raise each of these counts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningThe file graph captures tool-mediated file activity only.
“The file graph captures tool-mediated file activity only.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningIn the main collection this cost ten runs their recorded write, because their deliverable was created with a shell command, which leaves no edge, so file activity is undercounted in about 0.6% of runs.
“In the main collection this cost ten runs their recorded write, because their deliverable was created with a shell command, which leaves no edge, so file activity is undercounted in about 0.6% of runs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe reachable files are a containment gap in the setup; the looking is the agents' own behaviour, measured directly under the seal below.
“The reachable files are a containment gap in the setup; the looking is the agents' own behaviour, measured directly under the seal below.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningNo prompt forbade reading these files, and none asked for them; the only stated constraint concerned which files a team could create.
“No prompt forbade reading these files, and none asked for them; the only stated constraint concerned which files a team could create.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataFiles are not passive outputs; they are the one-to-many channel, and the cheaper one wherever one-to-one messaging would otherwise dominate.
“Files are not passive outputs; they are the one-to-many channel, and the cheaper one wherever one-to-one messaging would otherwise dominate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe cells that drift are the high-coordination ones, where the task leaves the team the most freedom in how to organise; the cells that reproduce are those where the task pins the coordination down, as a chain does.
“The cells that drift are the highcoordination ones, where the task leaves the team the most freedom in how to organise; the cells that reproduce are those where the task pins the coordination down, as a chain does.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe containment gap in the main collection is unsurprising in hindsight: agents that look for the answer key when they are confined will read it when they are not.
“it makes the containment gap in the main collection unsurprising in hindsight: agents that look for the answer key when they are confined will read it when they are not.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe seal stops short of an enforced sandbox: a read issued through the shell would not be captured, and the runs execute under a permissive filesystem mode.
“It stops short of an enforced sandbox: a read issued through the shell would not be captured, and the runs execute under a permissive filesystem mode.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe direction of the difference makes the rule conditional: Experiment 1 teams left to themselves coordinate by one-to-one messages, so replacing that channel with files removes repetition; Experiment 2 teams already pass their work through files, each step's output read by the next, so mandating more file traffic only adds overhead.
“The direction of the difference is the finding, and it makes the rule conditional: Experiment 1 teams left to themselves coordinate by one-to-one messages, so replacing that channel with files removes repetition; Experiment 2 teams already pass their work through files, each step's output read by the next, so mandating more file traffic only adds overhead.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe cross-experiment interaction reported here (p = 0.24) is an exploratory test, outside the pre-registration.
“the cross-experiment interaction reported here (p = 0.24) is an exploratory test, outside the pre-registration (Appendix A).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe associations explain about a tenth of the variance and the causality is open, since a run that goes well needs less repair traffic.
“but the associations explain about a tenth of the variance and the causality is open, since a run that goes well needs less repair traffic.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataNo prompt asks for any of these files; the test-file and prompt reads return only a placeholder, and the manifest read returns no grading material, so the reach for the test file is an unprompted tendency to seek out the grading material.
“No prompt asks for any of these files; the test-file and prompt reads return only a placeholder, and the manifest read returns no grading material, so the reach for the test file is an unprompted tendency to seek out the grading material.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningDecomposition creates interfaces between agents, every interface needs an owner, and the graph shows which interfaces have none; those are where the teams break.
“Decomposition creates interfaces between agents, every interface needs an owner, and the graph shows which interfaces have none; those are where the teams break.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningDiagnosing it draws on the specification, the identical failure across the runs, and the transcripts, none of which is the graph; what the coordination graph adds is the structural signature, that at eight agents the seam falls on a boundary between two different owners, an interface no single agent sits across.
“Diagnosing it draws on the specification, the identical failure across the runs, and the transcripts, none of which is the graph; what the coordination graph adds is the structural signature, that at eight agents the seam falls on a boundary between two different owners, an interface no single agent sits across.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningA coordinator exists only where the interaction structure carries the role, and a prompt clause alone does not create that structure.
“A coordinator exists only where the interaction structure carries the role, and a prompt clause alone does not create that structure.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenEdges come from the runtime's Read, Write, and Edit tools; a file operation issued through the shell leaves no edge.
“Edges come from the runtime's Read, Write, and Edit tools; a file operation issued through the shell leaves no edge.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe sealed batch is 244 runs at eight agents on the distributed task, covering the six conflicting-split cells (flat and coordinator under each file policy) and the two clean-split file cells, on the same pinned model and with the grading suite byte-identical to the released one.
“The sealed batch is 244 runs at eight agents on the distributed task, covering the six conflicting-split cells (flat and coordinator under each file policy) and the two clean-split file cells, on the same pinned model and with the grading suite byte-identical to the released one.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe two experiments differ in one prompt detail: Experiment 2's prompt asks agents to coordinate through messages, and its file-first behaviour runs against that instruction, so the cross-experiment contrasts are conservative with respect to it.
“The two experiments also differ in one prompt detail: Experiment 2's prompt asks agents to coordinate through messages, and its file-first behaviour runs against that instruction, so the cross-experiment contrasts are conservative with respect to it.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe reported token totals count input and output only, excluding the cached context re-read on each turn, which is the bulk of the throughput.
“The reported token totals count input and output only, excluding the cached context re-read on each turn, which is the bulk of the throughput”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe common thread is that what the prompt declares and what the interaction structure builds can differ, and the measured outcomes follow the second.
“The common thread is that what the prompt declares and what the interaction structure builds can differ, and the measured outcomes follow the second.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe bars are non-zero because the same file is created and revised several times per run.
“the bars are non-zero because the same file is created and revised several times per run.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataA within-batch regression of messaging on run order shows no drift, so batches are internally stable.
“A within-batch regression of messaging on run order shows no drift, so batches are internally stable”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataEvery cell carries ten repetitions, the model identifier is logged per turn (no mid-study change occurred), and within a batch a regression of messaging on run order shows no drift.
“Every cell carries ten repetitions, the model identifier is logged per turn (no mid-study change occurred), and within a batch a regression of messaging on run order shows no drift.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningIn every case the topology is an input: the system fixes or searches the structure and then scores the outcome, so the coordination that happens inside the structure goes unmeasured.
“In every case the topology is an input: the system fixes or searches the structure and then scores the outcome, so the coordination that happens inside the structure goes unmeasured.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationown dataA configuration is a distribution of runs.
“so a configuration is a distribution of runs”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataLeadership assigned by prompt is nominal only: it creates no structure and buys no reliable success, and a sealed replication of the eight-agent conflict cells leaves flat and coordinator teams level under every file policy.
“Leadership assigned by prompt is nominal only: it creates no structure and buys no reliable success, and a sealed replication of the eight-agent conflict cells leaves flat and coordinator teams level under every file policy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe two scaling arms were built without either confound and reproduce the deceleration and the plateau.
“the two scaling arms were built without either confound and reproduce the deceleration and the plateau.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThis is an undercount, so the sparse file structure we report is conservative: any unlogged operation would only add edges.
“This is an undercount, so the sparse file structure we report is conservative: any unlogged operation would only add edges.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningH7 met its pre-committed power-limited branch and is reported as directional.
“H7 met its pre-committed power-limited branch and is reported as directional”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataDecomposition creates interfaces between agents, each interface needs an owner, and the graph shows which have none.
“Decomposition creates interfaces between agents, each interface needs an owner, and the graph shows which have none.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningMulti-agent runs permit something stronger: every message, write, and read made through the runtime's tools is a logged event, so the temporal network of a collaboration can be recorded directly from the trace as it happens.
“Multi-agent runs permit something stronger: every message, write, and read made through the runtime's tools is a logged event, so the temporal network of a collaboration can be recorded directly from the trace as it happens.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
PremisereasoningWhat is missing is an instrument: a way to observe the coordination structure that emerges during a run, on the same footing for messages and for shared artefacts, and comparable across team sizes, configurations, and frameworks.
“What is missing is an instrument: a way to observe the coordination structure that emerges during a run, on the same footing for messages and for shared artefacts, and comparable across team sizes, configurations, and frameworks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningThe per-channel token figures are proxies on two bases.
“The per-channel token figures are proxies on two bases.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataAt eight agents the clean main-matrix cells leave four agents idle, and the four-agent break coincides with the tasks' four-unit structure.
“At eight agents the clean main-matrix cells leave four agents idle, and the four-agent break coincides with the tasks' four-unit structure”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe graph schema and parser apply to any runtime that logs tool calls and messages.
“The graph schema and parser apply to any runtime that logs tool calls and messages”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe run-level output-token results use the model's reported totals and are independent of the division, and the direction of the channel substitution survives any monotone re-attribution within a turn.
“the run-level output-token results use the model's reported totals and are independent of the division, and the direction of the channel substitution survives any monotone re-attribution within a turn.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationHuman group sizes cluster near five and fifteen in Zhou et al.'s analysis.
“human group sizes cluster near five and fifteen in Zhou et al.'s analysis [37]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [37]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataA sealed replication of the load-bearing cells, with decoys where the real files had sat, both confirmed the two findings it re-tested under containment, the coordinator null and the message-to-file substitution.
“A sealed replication of the load-bearing cells, with decoys where the real files had sat, both confirmed the two findings it re-tested under containment, the coordinator null and the message-to-file substitution”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThere are no sixteen-agent distributed runs.
“there are no sixteen-agent distributed runs”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe axis runs from the first message to the last, so it says nothing about where the run itself ends.
“The axis runs from the first message to the last, so it says nothing about where the run itself ends.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIn Experiment 2 the files already carry the coordination, so the rule only adds overhead.
“in Experiment 2 the files already carry the coordination, so the rule only adds overhead.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataFiles, usually treated as outputs, are the team's one-to-many channel, and requiring their use cuts output tokens by about 42% at eight agents on message-heavy work, while adding cost on chain-shaped work whose files already carry the coordination.
“Files, usually treated as outputs, are the team's one-to-many channel, and requiring their use cuts output tokens by about 42% at eight agents on message-heavy work, while adding cost on chain-shaped work whose files already carry the coordination.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe agents are stochastic and a model identifier does not fix the provider's state.
“The agents are stochastic and a model identifier does not fix the provider's state.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningToken cost on file edges divides a turn's output evenly across its tool calls, while token cost on message edges is estimated from message length, so the two are not a like-for-like total and the channel bars of Figure 8 show direction only.
“Token cost on file edges divides a turn's output evenly across its tool calls, while token cost on message edges is estimated from message length, so the two are not a like-for-like total and the channel bars of Figure 8 show direction only”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe coordinator is a prompt clause with no enforced routing, so Section 7 measures the effect of nominal leadership.
“The coordinator is a prompt clause with no enforced routing, so Section 7 measures the effect of nominal leadership”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDunbar links group size to limits on the relationships that can be monitored.
“Dunbar links group size to limits on the relationships that can be monitored [11]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [11]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningMulti-agent AI coding systems are evaluated by their outputs, but they succeed or fail by their coordination, and the coordination is invisible in the output.
“Multi-agent AI coding systems are evaluated by their outputs, but they succeed or fail by their coordination, and the coordination is invisible in the output.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe claims we generalise are structural: the handshake-then-core shape, the one-to-many economics of files, and the gap between nominal and structural leadership.
“The claims we generalise are structural: the handshake-then-core shape, the one-to-many economics of files, and the gap between nominal and structural leadership.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe quadratic cost of communication is real but shallow: it is an opening handshake, made once, after which each agent sustains a few channels, no hub forms, and the largest teams switch increasingly to broadcast and messaging growth levels off between eight and sixteen agents.
“The quadratic cost of communication is real but shallow: it is an opening handshake, made once, after which each agent sustains a few channels, no hub forms, and the largest teams switch increasingly to broadcast and messaging growth levels off between eight and sixteen agents.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationA second line of work designs the communication structure in advance: which agents may talk to which, in what order, and through what roles.
“A second line of work designs the communication structure in advance: which agents may talk to which, in what order, and through what roles.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [16]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [29]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [10]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [30]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenAt ten runs a cell's success rate carries a margin of roughly thirty percentage points, so single-cell readings are directional and pooled contrasts carry the weight.
“Power is the limit: at ten runs a cell's success rate carries a margin of roughly thirty percentage points, so single-cell readings are directional and pooled contrasts carry the weight.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenOur design cannot place the growth break more precisely than the eight-to-sixteen interval.
“our design cannot place the growth break more precisely than the eight-to-sixteen interval”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenConfirmatory claims rest on hypotheses pre-registered in both prediction and test (H1, H4-H8), with Benjamini-Hochberg correction within each contrast set.
“Confirmatory claims rest on hypotheses pre-registered in both prediction and test (H1, H4-H8), with Benjamini-Hochberg correction within each contrast set”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenAn ambiguous return-type clause in one specification was tightened and the worst cell re-validated (three of three passes) before the full schedules ran, leaving a cleaner outcome variable.
“an ambiguous return-type clause in one specification; the clause was tightened and the worst cell re-validated (three of three passes) before the full schedules ran, leaving a cleaner outcome variable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSpans of workable oversight have been placed at around five direct reports by Graicunas and near seven items by Miller.
“Spans of workable oversight have been placed at around five direct reports by Graicunas [15] and near seven items by Miller [25]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [15]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [25]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe numbers come from two synthetic Python tasks, one runtime, and one pinned model, and the specific values will not carry directly to other settings.
“The numbers come from two synthetic Python tasks, one runtime, and one pinned model, and the specific values will not carry directly to other settings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningH3 carries a separate qualification: the Experiment 2 plan pre-registers a within-Experiment-2 Fisher test of the flat condition (labelled peer in the pre-registration) against the coordinator condition (labelled orchestrator) on the conflicting split, which is inconclusive, whereas the cross-experiment interaction reported in Section 7 (p = 0.24) is an exploratory test the plan does not specify.
“H3 carries a separate qualification: the Experiment 2 plan pre-registers a within-Experiment-2 Fisher test of the flat condition (labelled peer in the pre-registration) against the coordinator condition (labelled orchestrator) on the conflicting split, which is inconclusive, whereas the cross-experiment interaction reported in Section 7 (p = 0.24) is an exploratory test the plan does not specify.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe strict alternative of topping up every flagged cell was considered and set aside, and we record the departure here.
“The strict alternative of topping up every flagged cell was considered and set aside, and we record the departure here.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe one deviation in the other direction is the sixteen-step scaling arm, pre-registered at twenty runs per allowed cell to tighten the plateau test of hypothesis H8.
“The one deviation in the other direction is the sixteen-step scaling arm, pre-registered at twenty runs per allowed cell to tighten the plateau test of hypothesis H8.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe pre-registrations released with the package are the Experiment 2 plan, which states H1 and H3-H6 with their tests, and the two scaling-arm commitments, which state H7 and H8.
“The pre-registrations released with the package are the Experiment 2 plan, which states H1 and H3-H6 with their tests, and the two scaling-arm commitments, which state H7 and H8.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataTwo ablations defend the design.
“Two ablations defend the design.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningWe topped up none of them, which is a deviation from the rule as written, made deliberately and recorded at the time.
“We topped up none of them, which is a deviation from the rule as written, made deliberately and recorded at the time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningWe judged it unnecessary because the confirmatory success contrasts pool across cells, so no single cell decides them, and because many of the graph-statistic flags were triggered by a metric other than the one a headline result uses for that cell, a cell flagged on file-read variance, say, whose headline reading is message count or sustained degree.
“we judged it unnecessary because the confirmatory success contrasts pool across cells, so no single cell decides them, and because many of the graph-statistic flags were triggered by a metric other than the one a headline result uses for that cell, a cell flagged on file-read variance, say, whose headline reading is message count or sustained degree.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningTopping the flagged cells up to twenty runs would have sharpened their estimates, the graph-statistic means as much as the success rates, by the usual factor of about √ 2.
“Topping the flagged cells up to twenty runs would have sharpened their estimates, the graph-statistic means as much as the success rates, by the usual factor of about √ 2”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe hypotheses committed in full, in both prediction and pre-registered test, are therefore H1 and H4-H8; H2 and H3 carry the qualifications above, and both are reported as inconclusive or null.
“The hypotheses committed in full, in both prediction and pre-registered test, are therefore H1 and H4-H8; H2 and H3 carry the qualifications above, and both are reported as inconclusive or null.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe Experiment 1 plan released alongside them pre-registers only the top-up decision above, so H2 is not a fully pre-registered hypothesis: its predicted direction was fixed from the Experiment 1 pilot, but its Fisher test and its correction set were specified after the schedule had run, before the inferential analysis.
“The Experiment 1 plan released alongside them pre-registers only the top-up decision above, so H2 is not a fully pre-registered hypothesis: its predicted direction was fixed from the Experiment 1 pilot, but its Fisher test and its correction set were specified after the schedule had run, before the inferential analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataFirst, the forbidden policy is a prompt clause; re-running the worst-affected cell with the workspace locked at the filesystem level produced the same workspaces and the same outcomes, so the prompt form is sound.
“First, the forbidden policy is a prompt clause; re-running the worst-affected cell with the workspace locked at the filesystem level produced the same workspaces and the same outcomes, so the prompt form is sound.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningAveraging over every configured agent and every run, including the silent ones, is what keeps the degree an honest per-agent expectation.
“Averaging over every configured agent and every run, including the silent ones, is what keeps the degree an honest per-agent expectation”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningA few hypotheses do read specific flagged cells, among them H1, H5, and H6, and their intervals should be read with that reduced precision in mind.
“A few hypotheses do read specific flagged cells, among them H1, H5, and H6, and their intervals should be read with that reduced precision in mind.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Whether a multi-agent team succeeds and what the run costs depends on how the agents coordinate.
“Whether the team succeeds, and what the run costs, depends on how the agents coordinate: how they divide the work, what they tell each other, which files they share, and how they resolve the interfaces between their contributions.”
The paper relies on this without support.
A file persists after it is written; one write can be read by many agents in any order; and its contents remain in the shared workspace across agent processes and outlive the session that wrote them.
“A file persists after it is written; one write can be read by many agents in any order; and its contents remain in the shared workspace across agent processes and outlive the session that wrote them.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Projects routinely carry more people than the work needs.
“projects routinely carry more people than the work needs”
Cites
Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x · Cited by 109,482 · see citing works
On a Test of Whether one of Two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger than the Other
Mann, H. B., & Whitney, D. R. (1947) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177730491 · Cited by 14,320 · see citing works
THE USE OF CONFIDENCE OR FIDUCIAL LIMITS ILLUSTRATED IN THE CASE OF THE BINOMIAL
Clopper, C. J., & Pearson, E. S. (1934) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/26.4.404 · Cited by 5,106 · see citing works
Discrete hierarchical organization of social group sizes
Zhou, W.-X., Sornette, D., Hill, R. A., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2005) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.2970 · Cited by 574 · see citing works
ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software Development
Qian, C., Liu, W., Liu, H., Chen, N., Dang, Y., Li, J., Yang, C., Chen, W., Su, Y., Cong, X., et al. (2024) · Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.810 · Cited by 490 · see citing works
Identification of coordination requirements
Cataldo, M., Wagstrom, P. A., Herbsleb, J. D., & Carley, K. M. (2006) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/1180875.1180929 · Cited by 400 · see citing works
Cataldo, M., Herbsleb, J. D., & Carley, K. M. (2008) · Proceedings of the ... ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement/International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement · doi:10.1145/1414004.1414008 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
Automated Program Repair via Conversation: Fixing 162 out of 337 Bugs for $0.42 Each using ChatGPT
Xia, C. S., & Zhang, L. (2024) · ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis (ISSTA) · doi:10.1145/3650212.3680323 · Cited by 279 · see citing works
Can developer-module networks predict failures?
Pinzger, M., Nagappan, N., & Murphy, T. B. (2008) · ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering (FSE) · doi:10.1145/1453101.1453105 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Self-collaboration code generation via ChatGPT
Dong, Y., Jiang, X., Jin, Z., & Li, G. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3672459 · Cited by 256 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…studies compare role-specialised teams with single agents based on the functional correctness and requirement coverage of the delivered software [9,33]; a controlled comparison across 260 configurations evaluates each one using benchmark-specific measures of task performance [20].”
Predicting failures with developer networks and social network analysis
Meneely, A., Williams, L. A., Snipes, W., & Osborne, J. A. (2008) · ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (ESEC/FSE) · doi:10.1145/1453101.1453106 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Leike, J., Martic, M., Krakovna, V., Ortega, P. A., Everitt, T., Lefrancq, A., Orseau, L., & Legg, S. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1711.09883 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework
Hong, S., Zhuge, M., Chen, J., Zheng, X., Cheng, Y., Zhang, C., Wang, J., Wang, Z., Yau, S. K. S., Lin, Z., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.00352 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Putting It All Together: Using Socio-technical Networks to Predict Failures
Bird, C., Nagappan, N., Gall, H. C., Murphy, T. B., & Dévanbu, P. (2009) · Proceedings/Proceedings - International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering · doi:10.1109/issre.2009.17 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
(2025) · doi:10.52202/085713-4082 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Evolutionary trends of developer coordination: a network approach
Joblin, M., Apel, S., & Mauerer, W. (2016) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-016-9478-9 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
MultiAgentBench : Evaluating the Collaboration and Competition of LLM agents
Zhu, K., Du, H., Hong, Z., Yang, X., Guo, S., Wang, Z., Wang, Z., Qian, C., Tang, R., Ji, H., et al. (2025) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.421 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
The Effects of Reward Misspecification: Mapping and Mitigating Misaligned Models
Pan, A., Bhatia, K., & Steinhardt, J. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2201.03544 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Capable language models can outgrow the benefits of collaboration
Kim, Y., Gu, K., Park, C., Park, C., Schmidgall, S., Heydari, A. A., Yan, Y., Zhang, Z., Zhuang, Y., Liu, Y., et al. (2026) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-026-01268-y · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Kapoor, S., Stroebl, B., Siegel, Z. S., Nadgir, N., & Narayanan, A. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.01502 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Scaling Large Language Model-based Multi-Agent Collaboration
Qian, C., Xie, Z., Wang, Y., Liu, W., Zhu, K., Xia, H., Dang, Y., Du, Z., Chen, W., Yang, C., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.07155 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Lyu, Z., Chen, S.-Q., Ji, Z., Wang, L.-W., Wang, S., Wu, D.-Y., Wang, W.-X., & Cheung, S.-C. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.10460 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Cut the Crap: An Economical Communication Pipeline for LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems
Zhang, G., Yue, Y., Li, Z., Yun, S., Wan, G., Wang, K., Cheng, D., Yu, J. X., & Chen, T. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.02506 · Cited by 4
Bai, L., Huang, Z., Wang, X., Sun, J., Mihalcea, R., Brynjolfsson, E., Pentland, A., & Pei, J. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.22750 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Language Agents as Optimizable Graphs
Zhuge, M., Wang, W., Kirsch, L., Faccio, F., Khizbullin, D., & Schmidhuber, J. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.16823 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
On Randomness in Agentic Evals
Bjarnason, B. H., Silva, A., & Monperrus, M. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.07150 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Zhang, S., Yin, M., Zhang, J., Liu, J., Han, Z., Zhang, J., Li, B., Wang, C., Wang, H., Chen, Y., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.00212 · Cited by 1 · cited 1×
“…misunderstanding: MAST derives fourteen failure modes from execution traces [7], attribution work asks which agent and which step caused a failed run [35], and a study of code-generation teams attributes three quarters of the failures it analyses to the boundary between planner and coder [22].”
Efficient Agents: Building Effective Agents While Reducing CostPreprint
Wang, N., Hu, X., Liu, P., Zhu, H., Hou, Y., Huang, H., Zhang, S., Yang, J., Liu, J., Zhang, G., et al. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.02694
EvilGenie: A Reward Hacking Benchmark
Gabor, J., Lynch, J., & Rosenfeld, J. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.21654
ImpossibleBench: Measuring LLMs' Propensity of Exploiting Test Cases
Zhong, Z., Raghunathan, A., & Carlini, N. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.20270
Benchmarking and Studying the LLM-based Agent System in End-to-End Software DevelopmentPreprint
Zeng, Z., Li, Y., Xie, R., et al. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.04064
Stochasticity in Agentic Evaluations: Quantifying Inconsistency with Intraclass Correlation
Mustahsan, Z., Lim, A., Anand, M., Jain, S., & McCann, B. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.06710
git2net - Mining Time-Stamped Co-Editing Networks from Large git Repositories
Gote, C., Scholtes, I., & Schweitzer, F. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/ACM 16th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR) · doi:10.1109/msr.2019.00070
Classifying Developers into Core and Peripheral: An Empirical Study on Count and Network Metrics
Joblin, M., Apel, S., Hunsen, C., et al. (2017) · 2017 IEEE/ACM 39th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) · doi:10.1109/icse.2017.23
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Yilun Du, Shuang Li, Antonio Torralba, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, and Igor Mordatch. Improv- ing factuality and reasoning in language models through multiagent debate. In Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), volume 235 of PMLR, pages 11733-11763, 2024.
- Robin I. M. Dunbar. Neocortex size as a constraint on group size in primates. Journal of Human Evolution, 22(6):469-493, 1992.
- Ronald A. Fisher. Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, 5th edition, 1934.
- Vytautas A. Graicunas. Relationship in organization. In Luther Gulick and Lyndall Urwick, editors, Papers on the Science of Administration. Institute of Public Administration, Columbia University, New York, 1937. First published in the Bulletin of the International Management Institute, 1933.
- George A. Miller. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2):81-97, 1956.
Cited by
Still being checked.
- Authors
- Destefanis, G., & Aste, T.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2026
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2608.16801
- OpenAlex
- W7203720074
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 34
- Type
- posted content
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
- Keywords
- multi-agent AI, coding agents, dynamic networks, team size, broadcast communication, shared files, coordinator role, team structure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review