The DOI matches its DataCite record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
AsynCodeBench: Benchmarking Collaboration of Asynchronous Multi-Agent Systems in Software Engineering
Abstract
Multi-agent coding has emerged as an increasingly active direction in software engineering, where complex development tasks are decomposed across multiple specialized agents working on different parts of the problem. Despite the shift from individual problem solving to distributed collaboration, multi-agent systems still lack a direct measure of collaboration and are largely evaluated through task-level outcomes inherited from single-agent coding, conflating individual coding capability with cross-agent coordination. We introduce AsynCodeBench, a dependency-centric benchmark for asynchronous multi-agent software engineering that represents each task with an explicit dependency graph and executable Dependency Checkers. Through this dependency-tracking process, we propose two complementary measures: Asynchronous Dependency Pass Rate (ADPR), which measures how many cross-agent dependencies are ultimately satisfied, and Dependency Resolution Step (DRS), which measures when each dependency first becomes satisfied during execution. AsynCodeBench comprises 19 tasks from real-world repositories, exposing 52 directed dependencies as explicit units for evaluating cross-agent collaboration. Experiments across model families, scales, and generations reveal a clear gap between coding and collaboration capability: improvements in coding performance do not necessarily translate into stronger collaboration, and task-level metrics can diverge substantially from dependency-level collaboration measures. Dependency-trajectory analysis further reveals that successful coordination often emerges not gradually, but through concentrated bursts in which many dependencies become resolved over a short portion of the execution trajectory, a pattern we term a hopping window.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SWE-EVO: Benchmarking Coding Agents in Long-Horizon Software Evolution Scenarios
Le, T., Thai, M. V. T., Manh, D. N., Nhat, H. P., & Bui, N. D. Q. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.18470 · Cited by 79 · cited 2×
“…preserves challenges that are largely abstracted away by function-level evaluation, including cross-file reasoning, software dependencies, execution feedback, and consistency across interacting changes (Gautam et al., 2025; Li et al., 2025; Deng et al., 2025; Le et al., 2026; Ding et al., 2026).”
Effective Strategies for Asynchronous Software Engineering Agents
Geng, J., & Neubig, G. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.21489 · Cited by 23 · cited 2×
“Repository-level benchmarks such as SWE-bench assess the final implementation through executable tests (Jimenez et al., 2024), while multi-agent coding systems often report gains using the same end-task metrics over single-agent baselines (Geng & Neubig, 2026; Wang et al., 2026).”
SWE-bench Multimodal: Do AI Systems Generalize to Visual Software Domains?
Yang, J., Jimenez, C. E., Zhang, A. L., Lieret, K., Yang, J., Wu, X., Press, O., Muennighoff, N., Synnaeve, G., Narasimhan, K. R., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.03859 · Cited by 3
When Agents Coordinate: Measuring Coordination in Multi-Agent AI Coding
Destefanis, G., & Aste, T. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.16801 · Cited by 3
Are Tools All We Need? Unveiling the Tool-Use Tax in LLM Agents
Zhang, K., Xiong, Z., Zhong, M., Jiang, Z., Yuan, Z., Li, Z., & Lin, Y. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.00136
Self-citationZhang, Y., Liu, F., Shan, Y., Huang, X., Yang, X., Zhu, Y., Cheng, X., Liu, C., Zeng, K., Zhang, T. J., et al. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.01045 · cited 2×
“More generally, agentic protocols can themselves introduce execution overhead or alter model behavior beyond the underlying model capability (Zhang et al., 2026a), motivating our explicit comparison of execution protocols rather than treating the surrounding agent framework as neutral.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, K., Xiong, Z., Jiang, Z., Zhong, M., Yuan, Z., Li, Z., Lin, B., Chang, C.-Y., Hu, M., Wang, H., & Lin, Y.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2026
- arXiv
- 2609.32662
- References
- 6
- Type
- Preprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: AsynCodeBench: Benchmarking Collaboration of Asynchronous Multi-Agent Systems in Software Engineering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.2609.32662
- The paper
- Zhang, K., Xiong, Z., Jiang, Z., Zhong, M., Yuan, Z., Li, Z., Lin, B., Chang, C.-Y., Hu, M., Wang, H., & Lin, Y. (2026). AsynCodeBench: Benchmarking Collaboration of Asynchronous Multi-Agent Systems in Software Engineering. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2609.32662
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.