The DOI matches its DataCite record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DeltaWorld: Physically Consistent Interactive World Simulators via Action-Conditioned Latent Increment Learning
Abstract
Interactive world simulators can provide scalable environments for robot planning, policy training, and evaluation by predicting action consequences while reducing reliance on repeated physical rollouts. To serve these applications, they must generate future image sequences that respond faithfully to robot actions and preserve the dynamics of robot-object interactions over long horizons. However, existing world models typically predict the entire next latent state and often fail to capture subtle changes induced by robot actions. Such omissions can produce physically implausible outcomes, including object interpenetration and excessive deformation. To address this limitation, we propose DeltaWorld, a physically consistent interactive world simulator for robotic manipulation. Our method introduces the Delta Latent Transition Model (Delta-LTM), which predicts action-induced latent feature changes and adds them to the current latent state to obtain the next state, rather than predicting the next latent state directly. To mitigate object interpenetration and excessive deformation in predicted future frames, Interaction-aware Latent Alignment is introduced to construct counterfactual interaction regions and supervise interaction-related latent changes. DeltaWorld is evaluated on the IWS manipulation benchmark and a self-collected cross-robot dataset covering multiple robot embodiments and manipulation tasks. On the cross-robot dataset, DeltaWorld reduces FVD by 46.6% and LPIPS by 31.1% relative to the IWS baseline. These results highlight the potential of DeltaWorld for long-horizon action-conditioned video prediction in robotic manipulation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Open X-Embodiment: Robotic Learning Datasets and RT-X Models
Embodiment Collaboration, O'Neill, A., Rehman, A., Gupta, A., Maddukuri, A., Gupta, A., Padalkar, A., Lee, A., Pooley, A., Gupta, A., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.08864 · Cited by 111
RoboDreamer: Learning Compositional World Models for Robot Imagination
Zhou, S., Du, Y., Chen, J., Li, Y., Yeung, D.-Y., & Gan, C. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.12377 · Cited by 4
LeWorldModel: Stable End-to-End Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture from Pixels
Maes, L., Lidec, Q. L., Scieur, D., LeCun, Y., & Balestriero, R. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.19312
Metadata
- Authors
- Hou, B., Cao, X., Zhang, C., Wang, S., & Cui, S.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2026
- arXiv
- 2610.02691
- References
- 3
- Type
- Preprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DeltaWorld: Physically Consistent Interactive World Simulators via Action-Conditioned Latent Increment Learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.2610.02691
- The paper
- Hou, B., Cao, X., Zhang, C., Wang, S., & Cui, S. (2026). DeltaWorld: Physically Consistent Interactive World Simulators via Action-Conditioned Latent Increment Learning. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2610.02691
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.