Open X-Embodiment: Robotic Learning Datasets and RT-X Models
Open accessAbstract
Large, high-capacity models trained on diverse datasets have shown remarkable successes on efficiently tackling downstream applications. In domains from NLP to Computer Vision, this has led to a consolidation of pretrained models, with general pretrained backbones serving as a starting point for many applications. Can such a consolidation happen in robotics? Conventionally, robotic learning methods train a separate model for every application, every robot, and even every environment. Can we instead train generalist X-robot policy that can be adapted efficiently to new robots, tasks, and environments? In this paper, we provide datasets in standardized data formats and models to make it possible to explore this possibility in the context of robotic manipulation, alongside experimental results that provide an example of effective X-robot policies. We assemble a dataset from 22 different robots collected through a collaboration between 21 institutions, demonstrating 527 skills (160266 tasks). We show that a high-capacity model trained on this data, which we call RT-X, exhibits positive transfer and improves the capabilities of multiple robots by leveraging experience from other platforms. More details can be found on the project website https://robotics-transformer-x.github.io.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
RT-2-X trains a 55B-parameter VLA policy on the Open X-Embodiment dataset and demonstrates state-of-the-art generalist manipulation policy performance.
“RT-2-X [1] trains a 55B-parameter VLA policy on the Open X-Embodiment dataset and demonstrates state-of-the-art generalist manipulation policy performance.”
From OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Model (2024) · cites this paper as [1]
The Policy architectures and Training and inference details sections identify RT-2-X as a vision-language-action policy and report a 55B-parameter version trained on a robotics data mixture. But Training and inference details specifies that this mixture covered 9 embodiments, not the full 22-embodiment Open X-Embodiment dataset. The reported strong performance and cross-robot transfer support the general thrust of the claim, but the unqualified state-of-the-art generalist performance claim exceeds the specific comparisons reported; page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredPrior transformer-based policy designs typically encode input images with large ResNet-style encoders and fuse the resulting image features with a comparatively small transformer.
“Prior transformer-based policy designs typically encode input images with large ResNetstyle [32] encoders and fuse the resulting image features with a comparatively small transformer [10, 67, 81, 17, 98, 61, 83].”
From Octo: An Open-Source Generalist Robot Policy (2024) · cites this paper as [67]
The Policy architectures section (page unavailable) describes RT-1 images being encoded by EfficientNet, combined with language features, and fed as tokens to a transformer. This supports the encoder-to-transformer design, but the paper does not establish that the transformer is comparatively small or that this design is typical; its other model, RT-2-X, uses a ViT visual backbone. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe robots and tasks in open-source datasets typically have one or two cameras and use low-frequency control, between 2 and 10 Hz.
“The robots and tasks in these datasets typically have one or two cameras and use lowfrequency control, between 2 and 10 Hz.”
From $π_0$: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Control (2024) · cites this paper as [10]
The Data format consolidation section says the models select one camera view from each dataset, but it does not establish that the robots or tasks typically have one or two cameras. Training and inference details reports a 3–10 Hz inference rate for the models, not a typical 2–10 Hz control range across the datasets. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredOpenVLA is a 7B-parameter open-source vision-language-action model trained on 970k robot demonstrations from the Open X-Embodiment dataset.
“we introduce OpenVLA, a 7B-parameter open-source VLA trained on a diverse collection of 970k real-world robot demonstrations.”
From OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Model (2024) · cites this paper as [1]
Section A, “The Open X-Embodiment Dataset” (page unavailable), describes a diverse collection of more than one million real-robot trajectories, supporting the identification of the dataset. It does not establish that OpenVLA is a 7B-parameter open-source model or that it was trained on exactly 970k demonstrations from this dataset. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredEven the largest robot manipulation datasets only have 100K to 1M examples.
“even the largest robot manipulation datasets [1, 11] only have 100K to 1M examples”
From OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Model (2024) · cites this paper as [1]
The Introduction (page unavailable) says that even the largest robot data-collection efforts produce datasets much smaller than major vision and NLP benchmarks, supporting the claim's general point. But the paper does not give a 100K–1M range for the largest manipulation datasets; its Open X-Embodiment Dataset section (page unavailable) reports more than 1M real-robot trajectories. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
OpenVLA is trained on 970k trajectories, while RT-2-X is trained on 350k trajectories.
“we curated a much larger training dataset for OpenVLA with 970k trajectories (vs. 350k for RT-2-X)”
From OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Model (2024) · cites this paper as [1]
The Training and inference details section says RT-2-X was trained using a robotics data mixture, but gives no trajectory count for that mixture. Our copy does not substantiate the cited comparison of 350k RT-2-X trajectories with 970k OpenVLA trajectories (searched: 350k, 350,000, 970k, and training-mixture size). (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredOcto is a transformer-based policy pretrained on 800k robot episodes from the Open X-Embodiment dataset.
“we introduce Octo, a large transformer-based policy trained on 800k trajectories from the Open X-Embodiment dataset, the largest robot manipulation dataset to date.”
From Octo: An Open-Source Generalist Robot Policy (2024) · cites this paper as [67]
The Open X-Embodiment Dataset section describes a dataset of more than 1 million robot trajectories, and the Discussion describes Transformer-based policies trained on its data. Our copy discusses RT-1-X and RT-2-X, not Octo, and does not substantiate the claim that Octo was pretrained on 800k episodes. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredOcto is trained on the largest robot manipulation dataset to date, 800k robot demonstrations from Open X-Embodiment.
“pretrained on the largest robot manipulation dataset to date: 800k robot demonstrations from the Open X-Embodiment dataset [67].”
From Octo: An Open-Source Generalist Robot Policy (2024) · cites this paper as [67]
Section A, “The Open X-Embodiment Dataset,” confirms that Open X-Embodiment is a large robot dataset, but gives its size as more than 1 million real-robot trajectories, not 800,000 demonstrations. The cited paper does not establish how many of those trajectories Octo used for pretraining. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe Open-X dataset contains approximately 1.5M robot episodes, of which 800k were curated for Octo training.
“The Open-X dataset contains approximately 1.5M robot episodes, of which we curate 800k for Octo training.”
From Octo: An Open-Source Generalist Robot Policy (2024) · cites this paper as [67]
Section A, “The Open X-Embodiment Dataset” (page unavailable), describes a dataset of 1M+ real robot trajectories, supporting its large scale but not the more specific estimate of approximately 1.5M episodes. The cited paper does not report 800k episodes curated for Octo training; in the citing sentence, “we curate” describes the citing authors’ own action. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe RT-X model used a more restricted subset of 350K episodes.
“We note that the RT-X model [67] used a more restricted subset of 350K episodes”
From Octo: An Open-Source Generalist Robot Policy (2024) · cites this paper as [67]
The Training and inference details section (page unavailable) says the RT-X experiments used a robotics mixture from 9 embodiments, fewer than the full dataset’s 22. It does not give an episode count for that mixture, so the specific figure of 350K episodes is unsupported (searched: “350K,” “350,000,” and episode and trajectory counts). (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredVision-language-action and cross-embodiment datasets motivate action-conditioned models for physical systems.
“Vision-language-action and cross-embodiment datasets motivate action-conditioned models for physical systems [39-41].”
From RSI-Anything: Unlocking Recursive Self-Improvement with World Models (2026) · cites this paper as [40]
The Introduction (page unavailable) describes an Open X-Embodiment dataset spanning multiple robots and language-conditioned policies trained on that data. The Data format consolidation section says the model takes images and language instructions as input and predicts robot actions. This supports the cross-embodiment and vision-language-action context, but not the specific description of the models as action-conditioned: in the passage, actions are outputs, not conditioning inputs. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredWhen using natural language to specify tasks, Octo outperforms RT-1-X across three different robot embodiments and setups.
“When using natural language to specify tasks, Octo outperforms RT-1-X [67], the current best openly available generalist robot policy across three different robot embodiments and setups.”
From Octo: An Open-Source Generalist Robot Policy (2024) · cites this paper as [67]
The pre-training mixture consists of 9.1% open-source datasets, including OXE, Bridge v2, and DROID.
“9 . 1% of the training mixture consists of open-source datasets, including OXE [10], Bridge v2 [52], and DROID [23].”
From $π_0$: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Control (2024) · cites this paper as [10]
The open-source datasets cover a wide range of objects and environments.
“However, these datasets cover a wide range of objects and environments.”
From $π_0$: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Control (2024) · cites this paper as [10]
The pre-training mixture consists of 10,000 hours of dexterous manipulation data from 7 different robot configurations and 68 tasks, in addition to large amounts of previously collected robot manipulation data from OXE, DROID, and Bridge.
“Our pre-training mixture consists of 10,000 hours of dexterous manipulation data from 7 different robot configurations and 68 tasks, in addition to large amounts of previously collected robot manipulation data from OXE [10], DROID [23], and Bridge [52].”
From $π_0$: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Control (2024) · cites this paper as [10]
The pre-training mixture consists of a weighted combination of our own dexterous manipulation datasets collected on 7 different robot configurations for 68 different tasks, and the entire OXE dataset, which contains data from 22 robots.
“In our training framework, we first assemble a pre-training mixture consisting of a weighted combination of our own dexterous manipulation datasets (Section V-C), collected on 7 different robot configurations for 68 different tasks, and the entire OXE dataset [10], which contains data from 22 robots.”
From π₀: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Control (2025) · cites this paper as [10]
Reproducing Internet-scale pretraining for robotics is still an open challenge.
“While reproducing this scale of pretraining for robotics is still an open challenge”
From OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Model (2024) · cites this paper as [1]
Octo is trained on the most diverse cross-embodied robot dataset to date, a mix of 25 datasets manually curated from the Open X-Embodiment dataset.
“Octo is trained on the most diverse crossembodied robot dataset to date, a mix of 25 datasets that we manually curated from the Open X-Embodiment dataset [67] (see Section III-B).”
From Octo: An Open-Source Generalist Robot Policy (2024) · cites this paper as [67]
OpenVLA outperforms RT-2-X by 16.5% absolute task success rate across 29 tasks and multiple robot embodiments.
“outperforming closed models such as RT-2-X (55B) by 16.5% in absolute task success rate across 29 tasks and multiple robot embodiments, with 7x fewer parameters.”
From OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Model (2024) · cites this paper as [1]
Table I (Training and inference details; page unavailable) reports results for RT-2-X (55B), but does not compare it with OpenVLA. Searches for OpenVLA, 29 tasks, and a 16.5% advantage found no passage in our copy addressing the claimed comparison. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredExisting VLAs are largely closed and inaccessible to the public.
“current models [1, 7, 17, 18] are closed , with limited visibility into model architecture, training procedures, and data mixture”
From OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Model (2024) · cites this paper as [1]
The RT-2 and Policy architectures sections describe a VLA and its architecture, while the Training and inference details section describes the authors’ data mixture. The Open X-Embodiment Repository section says the authors provide open-source data and model checkpoints. None of these passages assesses whether existing VLAs are largely closed or whether their architectures, training procedures, and data mixtures are generally inaccessible (searched: closed, proprietary, public availability, and model checkpoints). (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 106
- A. Radford, J. W. Kim, C. Hallacy, A. Ramesh, G. Goh, S. Agarwal, G. Sastry, A. Askell, P. Mishkin, J. Clark et al., "Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision," in International conference on machine learning. PMLR, 2021, pp. 8748-8763.
- R. Anil, A. M. Dai, O. Firat, M. Johnson, D. Lepikhin, A. Passos, S. Shakeri, E. Taropa, P. Bailey, Z. Chen et al., "PaLM 2 technical report," arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.10403, 2023. · arXiv
- T. Weyand, A. Araujo, B. Cao, and J. Sim, "Google landmarks dataset v2 -a large-scale benchmark for instance-level recognition and retrieval," in Proceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), June 2020.
- B. Wu, W. Chen, Y. Fan, Y. Zhang, J. Hou, J. Liu, and T. Zhang, "Tencent ML-images: A large-scale multi-label image database for visual representation learning," IEEE Access, vol. 7, 2019.
- J. Lehmann, R. Isele, M. Jakob, A. Jentzsch, D. Kontokostas, P. N. Mendes, S. Hellmann, M. Morsey, P. van Kleef, S. Auer, and C. Bizer, "DBpedia -a large-scale, multilingual knowledge base extracted from wikipedia." Semantic Web, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 167-195, 2015. [Online]. Available: http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/journals/semweb/ semweb6.html#LehmannIJJKMHMK15
- H. Mühleisen and C. Bizer, "Web data commons- extracting structured data from two large web cor- pora." LDOW, vol. 937, pp. 133-145, 2012.
- A. Brohan, N. Brown, J. Carbajal, Y. Chebotar, X. Chen, K. Choromanski, T. Ding, D. Driess, A. Dubey, C. Finn et al., "RT-2: Vision-language- action models transfer web knowledge to robotic con- trol," arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.15818, 2023. · arXiv
- C. Devin, A. Gupta, T. Darrell, P. Abbeel, and S. Levine, "Learning modular neural network policies for multi-task and multi-robot transfer," in 2017 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2017, pp. 2169-2176.
- T. Chen, A. Murali, and A. Gupta, "Hardware con- ditioned policies for multi-robot transfer learning," in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2018, pp. 9355-9366.
- A. Sanchez-Gonzalez, N. Heess, J. T. Springenberg, J. Merel, M. Riedmiller, R. Hadsell, and P. Battaglia, "Graph networks as learnable physics engines for inference and control," in Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning, ser. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, J. Dy and A. Krause, Eds., vol. 80. PMLR, 10-15 Jul 2018, pp. 4470-4479. [Online]. Available: https:// proceedings.mlr.press/v80/sanchez-gonzalez18a.html
- D. Pathak, C. Lu, T. Darrell, P. Isola, and A. A. Efros, "Learning to control self-assembling morphologies: a study of generalization via modularity," Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 32, 2019.
- R. Martín-Martín, M. Lee, R. Gardner, S. Savarese, J. Bohg, and A. Garg, "Variable impedance control in end-effector space. an action space for reinforcement learning in contact rich tasks," in Proceedings of the International Conference of Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2019.
- W. Huang, I. Mordatch, and D. Pathak, "One policy to control them all: Shared modular policies for agent- agnostic control," in ICML, 2020.
- V. Kurin, M. Igl, T. Rocktäschel, W. Boehmer, and S. Whiteson, "My body is a cage: the role of mor- phology in graph-based incompatible control," arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.01856, 2020. · arXiv
- K. Zakka, A. Zeng, P. Florence, J. Tompson, J. Bohg, and D. Dwibedi, "XIRL: Cross-embodiment inverse reinforcement learning," Conference on Robot Learn- ing (CoRL), 2021.
- A. Ghadirzadeh, X. Chen, P. Poklukar, C. Finn, M. Björkman, and D. Kragic, "Bayesian meta-learning for few-shot policy adaptation across robotic plat- forms," in 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, 2021, pp. 1274-1280.
- A. Gupta, L. Fan, S. Ganguli, and L. Fei-Fei, "Meta- morph: Learning universal controllers with transform- ers," in International Conference on Learning Repre- sentations, 2021.
- D. Shah, A. Sridhar, A. Bhorkar, N. Hirose, and S. Levine, "GNM: A general navigation model to drive any robot," in 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2023, pp. 7226-7233.
- Y. Zhou, S. Sonawani, M. Phielipp, S. Stepputtis, and H. Amor, "Modularity through attention: Efficient training and transfer of language-conditioned policies for robot manipulation," in Proceedings of The 6th Conference on Robot Learning, ser. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, K. Liu, D. Kulic, and J. Ichnowski, Eds., vol. 205. PMLR, 14- 18 Dec 2023, pp. 1684-1695. [Online]. Available: https://proceedings.mlr.press/v205/zhou23b.html
- S. Dasari, F. Ebert, S. Tian, S. Nair, B. Bucher, K. Schmeckpeper, S. Singh, S. Levine, and C. Finn, "RoboNet: Large-scale multi-robot learning," in Con- ference on Robot Learning (CoRL), vol. 100. PMLR, 2019, pp. 885-897.
- E. S. Hu, K. Huang, O. Rybkin, and D. Jayaraman, "Know thyself: Transferable visual control policies through robot-awareness," in International Conference on Learning Representations, 2022.
- K. Bousmalis, G. Vezzani, D. Rao, C. Devin, A. X. Lee, M. Bauza, T. Davchev, Y. Zhou, A. Gupta, A. Raju et al., "RoboCat: A self-improving founda- tion agent for robotic manipulation," arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.11706, 2023. · arXiv
- J. Yang, D. Sadigh, and C. Finn, "Polybot: Training one policy across robots while embracing variability," arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.03719, 2023. · arXiv
- S. Reed, K. Zolna, E. Parisotto, S. G. Colmenarejo, A. Novikov, G. Barth-maron, M. Giménez, Y. Sul- sky, J. Kay, J. T. Springenberg, T. Eccles, J. Bruce, A. Razavi, A. Edwards, N. Heess, Y. Chen, R. Had- sell, O. Vinyals, M. Bordbar, and N. de Freitas, "A generalist agent," Transactions on Machine Learning Research, 2022.
- G. Salhotra, I.-C. A. Liu, and G. Sukhatme, "Bridging action space mismatch in learning from demonstra- tions," arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.03833, 2023. · arXiv
- I. Radosavovic, B. Shi, L. Fu, K. Goldberg, T. Darrell, and J. Malik, "Robot learning with sensorimotor pre- training," in Conference on Robot Learning, 2023.
- L. Shao, F. Ferreira, M. Jorda, V. Nambiar, J. Luo, E. Solowjow, J. A. Ojea, O. Khatib, and J. Bohg, "UniGrasp: Learning a unified model to grasp with multifingered robotic hands," IEEE Robotics and Au- tomation Letters, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 2286-2293, 2020.
- Z. Xu, B. Qi, S. Agrawal, and S. Song, "Adagrasp: Learning an adaptive gripper-aware grasping policy," in 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2021, pp. 4620-4626.
- D. Shah, A. Sridhar, N. Dashora, K. Stachowicz, K. Black, N. Hirose, and S. Levine, "ViNT: A Foun- dation Model for Visual Navigation," in 7th Annual Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL), 2023.
- Y. Liu, A. Gupta, P. Abbeel, and S. Levine, "Imitation from observation: Learning to imitate behaviors from raw video via context translation," in 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2018, pp. 1118-1125.
- P. Sharma, D. Pathak, and A. Gupta, "Third-person visual imitation learning via decoupled hierarchical controller," Advances in Neural Information Process- ing Systems, vol. 32, 2019.
- L. Smith, N. Dhawan, M. Zhang, P. Abbeel, and S. Levine, "Avid: Learning multi-stage tasks via pixel- level translation of human videos," arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.04443, 2019. · arXiv
- A. Bonardi, S. James, and A. J. Davison, "Learning one-shot imitation from humans without humans," IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 3533-3539, 2020.
- K. Schmeckpeper, O. Rybkin, K. Daniilidis, S. Levine, and C. Finn, "Reinforcement learning with videos: Combining offline observations with interaction," in Conference on Robot Learning. PMLR, 2021, pp. 339-354.
- H. Xiong, Q. Li, Y.-C. Chen, H. Bharadhwaj, S. Sinha, and A. Garg, "Learning by watching: Physical imita- tion of manipulation skills from human videos," in 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelli- gent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, 2021, pp. 7827-7834.
- E. Jang, A. Irpan, M. Khansari, D. Kappler, F. Ebert, C. Lynch, S. Levine, and C. Finn, "BC-Z: Zero-shot task generalization with robotic imitation learning," in Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL), 2021, pp. 991-1002.
- M. Ding, Y. Xu, Z. Chen, D. D. Cox, P. Luo, J. B. Tenenbaum, and C. Gan, "Embodied concept learner: Self-supervised learning of concepts and map- ping through instruction following," in Conference on Robot Learning. PMLR, 2023, pp. 1743-1754.
- S. Bahl, R. Mendonca, L. Chen, U. Jain, and D. Pathak, "Affordances from human videos as a versatile representation for robotics," in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), June 2023, pp. 13 778- 13 790.
- P. Sermanet, K. Xu, and S. Levine, "Unsupervised per- ceptual rewards for imitation learning," arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.06699, 2016. · arXiv
- L. Shao, T. Migimatsu, Q. Zhang, K. Yang, and J. Bohg, "Concept2Robot: Learning manipulation con- cepts from instructions and human demonstrations," in Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems (RSS), 2020.
- A. S. Chen, S. Nair, and C. Finn, "Learning generaliz- able robotic reward functions from "in-the-wild" hu- man videos," arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.16817, 2021. · arXiv
- S. Kumar, J. Zamora, N. Hansen, R. Jangir, and X. Wang, "Graph inverse reinforcement learning from diverse videos," in Conference on Robot Learning. PMLR, 2023, pp. 55-66.
- M. Alakuijala, G. Dulac-Arnold, J. Mairal, J. Ponce, and C. Schmid, "Learning reward functions for robotic manipulation by observing humans," in 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2023, pp. 5006-5012.
- C. Wang, L. Fan, J. Sun, R. Zhang, L. Fei-Fei, D. Xu, Y. Zhu, and A. Anandkumar, "Mimicplay: Long- horizon imitation learning by watching human play," in Conference on Robot Learning, 2023.
- K. Schmeckpeper, A. Xie, O. Rybkin, S. Tian, K. Daniilidis, S. Levine, and C. Finn, "Learning pre- dictive models from observation and interaction," in European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 2020, pp. 708-725.
- S. Nair, A. Rajeswaran, V. Kumar, C. Finn, and A. Gupta, "R3m: A universal visual representation for robot manipulation," in CoRL, 2022.
- T. Xiao, I. Radosavovic, T. Darrell, and J. Malik, "Masked visual pre-training for motor control," arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.06173, 2022. · arXiv
- I. Radosavovic, T. Xiao, S. James, P. Abbeel, J. Ma- lik, and T. Darrell, "Real-world robot learning with masked visual pre-training," in Conference on Robot Learning, 2022.
- Y. J. Ma, S. Sodhani, D. Jayaraman, O. Bastani, V. Kumar, and A. Zhang, "Vip: Towards universal visual reward and representation via value-implicit pre-training," arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.00030, 2022. · arXiv
- A. Majumdar, K. Yadav, S. Arnaud, Y. J. Ma, C. Chen, S. Silwal, A. Jain, V.-P. Berges, P. Abbeel, J. Malik et al., "Where are we in the search for an artificial vi- sual cortex for embodied intelligence?" arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.18240, 2023. · arXiv
- Y. Mu, S. Yao, M. Ding, P. Luo, and C. Gan, "EC2: Emergent communication for embodied control," in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2023, pp. 6704- 6714.
- S. Bahl, R. Mendonca, L. Chen, U. Jain, and D. Pathak, "Affordances from human videos as a versatile representation for robotics," in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2023, pp. 13 778-13 790.
- Y. Jiang, S. Moseson, and A. Saxena, "Efficient grasping from RGBD images: Learning using a new rectangle representation," in 2011 IEEE International conference on robotics and automation. IEEE, 2011, pp. 3304-3311.
- L. Pinto and A. K. Gupta, "Supersizing self- supervision: Learning to grasp from 50k tries and 700 robot hours," 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 3406-3413, 2015.
- D. Kappler, J. Bohg, and S. Schaal, "Leveraging big data for grasp planning," in ICRA, 2015, pp. 4304- 4311.
- A. Depierre, E. Dellandréa, and L. Chen, "Jacquard: A large scale dataset for robotic grasp detection," in 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelli- gent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, 2018, pp. 3511-3516.
- S. Levine, P. Pastor, A. Krizhevsky, J. Ibarz, and D. Quillen, "Learning hand-eye coordination for robotic grasping with deep learning and large-scale data collection," The International journal of robotics research, vol. 37, no. 4-5, pp. 421-436, 2018.
- D. Kalashnikov, A. Irpan, P. Pastor, J. Ibarz, A. Her- zog, E. Jang, D. Quillen, E. Holly, M. Kalakrishnan, V. Vanhoucke et al., "QT-Opt: Scalable deep rein- forcement learning for vision-based robotic manipu- lation," arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.10293, 2018. · arXiv
- H.-S. Fang, C. Wang, M. Gou, and C. Lu, "Graspnet- 1billion: a large-scale benchmark for general object grasping," in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2020, pp. 11 444-11 453.
- C. Eppner, A. Mousavian, and D. Fox, "ACRONYM: A large-scale grasp dataset based on simulation," in 2021 IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, ICRA, 2020.
- K. Bousmalis, A. Irpan, P. Wohlhart, Y. Bai, M. Kel- cey, M. Kalakrishnan, L. Downs, J. Ibarz, P. Pastor, K. Konolige, S. Levine, and V. Vanhoucke, "Using simulation and domain adaptation to improve effi- ciency of deep robotic grasping," in ICRA, 2018, pp. 4243-4250.
- K.-T. Yu, M. Bauza, N. Fazeli, and A. Rodriguez, "More than a million ways to be pushed. a high- fidelity experimental dataset of planar pushing," in 2016 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS). IEEE, 2016, pp. 30-37.
- C. Finn and S. Levine, "Deep visual foresight for plan- ning robot motion," in 2017 IEEE International Con- ference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2017, pp. 2786-2793.
- F. Ebert, C. Finn, S. Dasari, A. Xie, A. Lee, and S. Levine, "Visual foresight: Model-based deep rein- forcement learning for vision-based robotic control," arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.00568, 2018. · arXiv
- P. Shilane, P. Min, M. Kazhdan, and T. Funkhouser, "The princeton shape benchmark," in Shape Modeling Applications, 2004, pp. 167-388.
- W. Wohlkinger, A. Aldoma Buchaca, R. Rusu, and M. Vincze, "3DNet: Large-Scale Object Class Recog- nition from CAD Models," in IEEE International Con- ference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2012.
- A. Kasper, Z. Xue, and R. Dillmann, "The kit object models database: An object model database for object recognition, localization and manipulation in service robotics," The International Journal of Robotics Re- search, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 927-934, 2012.
- A. Singh, J. Sha, K. S. Narayan, T. Achim, and P. Abbeel, "BigBIRD: A large-scale 3D database of object instances," in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2014, pp. 509- 516.
- B. Calli, A. Walsman, A. Singh, S. Srinivasa, P. Abbeel, and A. M. Dollar, "Benchmarking in ma- nipulation research: Using the Yale-CMU-Berkeley object and model set," IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 36-52, 2015.
- Zhirong Wu, S. Song, A. Khosla, Fisher Yu, Linguang Zhang, Xiaoou Tang, and J. Xiao, "3D ShapeNets: A deep representation for volumetric shapes," in IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recogni- tion (CVPR), 2015, pp. 1912-1920.
- Y. Xiang, W. Kim, W. Chen, J. Ji, C. Choy, H. Su, R. Mottaghi, L. Guibas, and S. Savarese, "Object- Net3D: A large scale database for 3d object recog- nition," in European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV). Springer, 2016, pp. 160-176.
- D. Morrison, P. Corke, and J. Leitner, "Egad! an evolved grasping analysis dataset for diversity and re- producibility in robotic manipulation," IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 4368-4375, 2020.
- R. Gao, Y.-Y. Chang, S. Mall, L. Fei-Fei, and J. Wu, "ObjectFolder: A dataset of objects with implicit vi- sual, auditory, and tactile representations," in Confer- ence on Robot Learning, 2021, pp. 466-476.
- L. Downs, A. Francis, N. Koenig, B. Kinman, R. Hick- man, K. Reymann, T. B. McHugh, and V. Vanhoucke, "Google scanned objects: A high-quality dataset of 3D scanned household items," in 2022 International Con- ference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2022, pp. 2553-2560.
- D. Kalashnikov, J. Varley, Y. Chebotar, B. Swan- son, R. Jonschkowski, C. Finn, S. Levine, and K. Hausman, "MT-Opt: Continuous multi-task robotic reinforcement learning at scale," arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.08212, 2021. · arXiv
- A. Mandlekar, Y. Zhu, A. Garg, J. Booher, M. Spero, A. Tung, J. Gao, J. Emmons, A. Gupta, E. Orbay, S. Savarese, and L. Fei-Fei, "RoboTurk: A crowdsourcing platform for robotic skill learning through imitation," CoRR, vol. abs/1811.02790, 2018. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1811.02790 · arXiv
- P. Sharma, L. Mohan, L. Pinto, and A. Gupta, "Mul- tiple interactions made easy (MIME): Large scale demonstrations data for imitation," in Conference on robot learning. PMLR, 2018, pp. 906-915.
- A. Mandlekar, J. Booher, M. Spero, A. Tung, A. Gupta, Y. Zhu, A. Garg, S. Savarese, and L. Fei- Fei, "Scaling robot supervision to hundreds of hours with RoboTurk: Robotic manipulation dataset through human reasoning and dexterity," in 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, 2019, pp. 1048-1055.
- A. Mandlekar, D. Xu, J. Wong, S. Nasiriany, C. Wang, R. Kulkarni, L. Fei-Fei, S. Savarese, Y. Zhu, and R. Martín-Martín, "What matters in learning from offline human demonstrations for robot manipulation," in arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.03298, 2021. · arXiv
- C. Lynch, A. Wahid, J. Tompson, T. Ding, J. Betker, R. Baruch, T. Armstrong, and P. Florence, "Interac- tive language: Talking to robots in real time," IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2023.
- H.-S. Fang, H. Fang, Z. Tang, J. Liu, J. Wang, H. Zhu, and C. Lu, "RH20T: A robotic dataset for learning diverse skills in one-shot," in RSS 2023 Workshop on Learning for Task and Motion Planning, 2023.
- H. Bharadhwaj, J. Vakil, M. Sharma, A. Gupta, S. Tul- siani, and V. Kumar, "RoboAgent: Towards sample efficient robot manipulation with semantic augmenta- tions and action chunking," arxiv, 2023.
- T. Winograd, "Understanding natural language," Cognitive Psychology, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1-191, 1972. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/0010028572900023
- M. MacMahon, B. Stankiewicz, and B. Kuipers, "Walk the talk: Connecting language, knowledge, and action in route instructions," in Proceedings of the Twenty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelli- gence, 2006.
- T. Kollar, S. Tellex, D. Roy, and N. Roy, "Toward understanding natural language directions," in 2010 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human- Robot Interaction (HRI), 2010, pp. 259-266.
- D. L. Chen and R. J. Mooney, "Learning to interpret natural language navigation instructions from observa- tions," in Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth AAAI Con- ference on Artificial Intelligence, 2011, p. 859-865.
- F. Duvallet, J. Oh, A. Stentz, M. Walter, T. Howard, S. Hemachandra, S. Teller, and N. Roy, "Inferring maps and behaviors from natural language instruc- tions," in International Symposium on Experimental Robotics (ISER), 2014.
- J. Luketina, N. Nardelli, G. Farquhar, J. N. Foer- ster, J. Andreas, E. Grefenstette, S. Whiteson, and T. Rocktäschel, "A survey of reinforcement learning informed by natural language," in IJCAI, 2019.
- S. Stepputtis, J. Campbell, M. Phielipp, S. Lee, C. Baral, and H. Ben Amor, "Language-conditioned imitation learning for robot manipulation tasks," Ad- vances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 33, pp. 13 139-13 150, 2020.
- S. Nair, E. Mitchell, K. Chen, S. Savarese, C. Finn et al., "Learning language-conditioned robot behavior from offline data and crowd-sourced annotation," in Conference on Robot Learning. PMLR, 2022, pp. 1303-1315.
- O. Mees, L. Hermann, E. Rosete-Beas, and W. Burgard, "CALVIN: A benchmark for language- conditioned policy learning for long-horizon robot manipulation tasks," IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2022.
- O. Mees, L. Hermann, and W. Burgard, "What matters in language conditioned robotic imitation learning over unstructured data," IEEE Robotics and Automa- tion Letters, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 11 205-11 212, 2022.
- M. Shridhar, L. Manuelli, and D. Fox, "Perceiver- actor: A multi-task transformer for robotic manipu- lation," Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL), 2022.
- F. Hill, S. Mokra, N. Wong, and T. Harley, "Human instruction-following with deep reinforcement learn- ing via transfer-learning from text," arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.09382, 2020. · arXiv
- M. Ahn, A. Brohan, N. Brown, Y. Chebotar, O. Cortes, B. David, C. Finn, K. Gopalakrishnan, K. Hausman, A. Herzog et al., "Do as I can, not as I say: Grounding language in robotic affordances," Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL), 2022.
- Y. Jiang, A. Gupta, Z. Zhang, G. Wang, Y. Dou, Y. Chen, L. Fei-Fei, A. Anandkumar, Y. Zhu, and L. Fan, "VIMA: General robot manipulation with multimodal prompts," International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2023.
- S. Vemprala, R. Bonatti, A. Bucker, and A. Kapoor, "ChatGPT for robotics: Design principles and model abilities," Microsoft Auton. Syst. Robot. Res, vol. 2, p. 20, 2023.
- W. Huang, C. Wang, R. Zhang, Y. Li, J. Wu, and L. Fei-Fei, "VoxPoser: Composable 3d value maps for robotic manipulation with language models," arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.05973, 2023. · arXiv
- M. Shridhar, L. Manuelli, and D. Fox, "Cliport: What and where pathways for robotic manipulation," in Conference on Robot Learning. PMLR, 2022, pp. 894-906.
- A. Stone, T. Xiao, Y. Lu, K. Gopalakrishnan, K.-H. Lee, Q. Vuong, P. Wohlhart, B. Zitkovich, F. Xia, C. Finn et al., "Open-world object manipulation using pre-trained vision-language models," arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.00905, 2023. · arXiv
- Y. Mu, Q. Zhang, M. Hu, W. Wang, M. Ding, J. Jin, B. Wang, J. Dai, Y. Qiao, and P. Luo, "EmbodiedGPT: Vision-language pre-training via embodied chain of thought," arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.15021, 2023. · arXiv
- M. Tan and Q. Le, "EfficientNet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks," in Inter- national conference on machine learning. PMLR, 2019, pp. 6105-6114.
- A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, Ł. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin, "Attention is all you need," Advances in neural infor- mation processing systems, vol. 30, 2017.
- E. Rosete-Beas, O. Mees, G. Kalweit, J. Boedecker, and W. Burgard, "Latent plans for task agnostic offline reinforcement learning," in Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL), 2022.
- O. Mees, J. Borja-Diaz, and W. Burgard, "Grounding language with visual affordances over unstructured data," in Proceedings of the IEEE International Con- ference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), London, UK, 2023.
- J. Luo, C. Xu, X. Geng, G. Feng, K. Fang, L. Tan, S. Schaal, and S. Levine, "Multi-stage cable rout- ing through hierarchical imitation learning," arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.08927, 2023. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
π₀: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Control
Black, K., Brown, N., Driess, D., Esmail, A., Equi, M., Finn, C., Fusai, N., Groom, L., Hausman, K., Ichter, B., et al. (2025) · Robotics: Science and Systems XXI · doi:10.15607/rss.2025.xxi.010 · Cited by 295 · see citing works
Self-citationDROID: A Large-Scale In-The-Wild Robot Manipulation Dataset
Khazatsky, A., Pertsch, K., Nair, S., Balakrishna, A., Dasari, S., Karamcheti, S., Nasiriany, S., Srirama, M., Chen, L., Ellis, K., et al. (2024) · Robotics: Science and Systems XX · doi:10.15607/rss.2024.xx.120 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Self-citationOcto: An Open-Source Generalist Robot Policy
Ghosh, D., Walke, H., Pertsch, K., Black, K., Mees, O., Dasari, S., Hejna, J., Kreiman, T., Xu, C., Luo, J., et al. (2024) · Robotics: Science and Systems XX · doi:10.15607/rss.2024.xx.090 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Self-citationThinking in Space: How Multimodal Large Language Models See, Remember, and Recall Spaces
Yang, J., Yang, S., Gupta, A. W., Han, R., Fei-Fei, L., & Xie, S. (2025) · 2025 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52734.2025.00994 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Self-citationOpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Model
Kim, M. J., Pertsch, K., Karamcheti, S., Xiao, T., Balakrishna, A., Nair, S., Rafailov, R., Foster, E., Lam, G., Sanketi, P., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.09246 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Self-citationTHE COLOSSEUM: A Benchmark for Evaluating Generalization for Robotic Manipulation
Pumacay, W., Singh, I., Duan, J., Krishna, R., Thomason, J., & Fox, D. (2024) · Robotics: Science and Systems XX · doi:10.15607/rss.2024.xx.133 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
On the Effectiveness of Retrieval, Alignment, and Replay in Manipulation
Palo, N. D., & Johns, E. (2024) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2024.3349832 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Self-citation$π_0$: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Control
Black, K., Brown, N., Driess, D., Esmail, A., Equi, M., Finn, C., Fusai, N., Groom, L., Hausman, K., Ichter, B., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.24164 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citationMulti-Agent Risks from Advanced AI
Hammond, L., Chan, A., Clifton, J., Hoelscher-Obermaier, J., Khan, A., McLean, E., Smith, C., Barfuss, W., Foerster, J., Gavenčiak, T., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.14143 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Scaling Instructable Agents Across Many Simulated Worlds
SIMA Team, Raad, M. A., Ahuja, A., Barros, C., Besse, F., Bolt, A., Bolton, A., Brownfield, B., Buttimore, G., Cant, M., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.10179 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Self-citationReal-Time Execution of Action Chunking Flow Policies
Black, K., Galliker, M., & Levine, S. (2025) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 38 · doi:10.52202/085713-1122 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Self-citationGR00T N1: An Open Foundation Model for Generalist Humanoid Robots
NVIDIA, :, Bjorck, J., Castañeda, F., Cherniadev, N., Da, X., Ding, R., Fan, L. "., Fang, Y., Fox, D., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.14734 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Self-citationThinking in Space: How Multimodal Large Language Models See, Remember, and Recall Spaces
Yang, J., Yang, S., Gupta, A. W., Han, R., Fei-Fei, L., & Xie, S. (2024) · arXiv · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Self-citationRoboCasa: Large-Scale Simulation of Everyday Tasks for Generalist Robots
Nasiriany, S., Maddukuri, A., Zhang, L., Parikh, A., Lo, A., Joshi, A., Mandlekar, A., & Zhu, Y. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.02523 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citationMechanistic interpretability for steering vision-language-action models
Häon, B., Stocking, K., Chuang, I., & Tomlin, C. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.00328 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Video Diffusion Models: A Survey
Melnik, A., Ljubljanac, M., Lu, C., Yan, Q., Ren, W., & Ritter, H. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.03150 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citationFAST: Efficient Action Tokenization for Vision-Language-Action Models
Pertsch, K., Stachowicz, K., Ichter, B., Driess, D., Nair, S., Vuong, Q., Mees, O., Finn, C., & Levine, S. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.09747 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Self-citationYang, Z., Liu, C., Zhou, Y., Lv, R., Cui, T., Yi, S., Zhu, H., Lu, I., & Sun, J. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.24093
Self-citationRSI-Anything: Unlocking Recursive Self-Improvement with World Models
Cui, T., Zeng, P., Xu, W., Xiao, H., Xue, S., Gao, Q., Ouyang, W., Heng, P. A., Yin, Z., Wu, Y., et al. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.13912
Self-citation
- Authors
- Embodiment Collaboration, O'Neill, A., Rehman, A., Gupta, A., Maddukuri, A., Gupta, A., Padalkar, A., Lee, A., Pooley, A., Gupta, A., Mandlekar, A., Jain, A., Tung, A., Bewley, A., Herzog, A., Irpan, A., Khazatsky, A., Rai, A., Gupta, A., Wang, A., Kolobov, A., Singh, A., Garg, A., Kembhavi, A., Xie, A., Brohan, A., Raffin, A., Sharma, A., Yavary, A., Jain, A., Balakrishna, A., Wahid, A., Burgess-Limerick, B., Kim, B., Schölkopf, B., Wulfe, B., Ichter, B., Lu, C., Xu, C., Le, C., Finn, C., Wang, C., Xu, C., Chi, C., Huang, C., Chan, C., Agia, C., Pan, C., Fu, C., Devin, C., Xu, D., Morton, D., Driess, D., Chen, D., Pathak, D., Shah, D., Büchler, D., Jayaraman, D., Kalashnikov, D., Sadigh, D., Johns, E., Foster, E., Liu, F., Ceola, F., Xia, F., Zhao, F., Frujeri, F. V., Stulp, F., Zhou, G., Sukhatme, G. S., Salhotra, G., Yan, G., Feng, G., Schiavi, G., Berseth, G., Kahn, G., Yang, G., Wang, G., Su, H., Fang, H.-S., Shi, H., Bao, H., Amor, H. B., Christensen, H. I., Furuta, H., Bharadhwaj, H., Walke, H., Fang, H., Ha, H., Mordatch, I., Radosavovic, I., Leal, I., Liang, J., Abou-Chakra, J., Kim, J., Drake, J., Peters, J., Schneider, J., Hsu, J., Vakil, J., Bohg, J., Bingham, J., Wu, J., Gao, J., Hu, J., Wu, J., Wu, J., Sun, J., Luo, J., Gu, J., Tan, J., Oh, J., Wu, J., Lu, J., Yang, J., Malik, J., Silvério, J., Hejna, J., Booher, J., Tompson, J., Yang, J., Salvador, J., Lim, J. J., Han, J., Wang, K., Rao, K., Pertsch, K., Hausman, K., Go, K., Gopalakrishnan, K., Goldberg, K., Byrne, K., Oslund, K., Kawaharazuka, K., Black, K., Lin, K., Zhang, K., Ehsani, K., Lekkala, K., Ellis, K., Rana, K., Srinivasan, K., Fang, K., Singh, K. P., Zeng, K.-H., Hatch, K., Hsu, K., Itti, L., Chen, L. Y., Pinto, L., Fei-Fei, L., Tan, L., Fan, L. "., Ott, L., Lee, L., Weihs, L., Chen, M., Lepert, M., Memmel, M., Tomizuka, M., Itkina, M., Castro, M. G., Spero, M., Du, M., Ahn, M., Yip, M. C., Zhang, M., Ding, M., Heo, M., Srirama, M. K., Sharma, M., Kim, M. J., Irshad, M. Z., Kanazawa, N., Hansen, N., Heess, N., Joshi, N. J., Suenderhauf, N., Liu, N., Di Palo, N., Shafiullah, N. M. M., Mees, O., Kroemer, O., Bastani, O., Sanketi, P. R., Miller, P. "., Yin, P., Wohlhart, P., Xu, P., Fagan, P. D., Mitrano, P., Sermanet, P., Abbeel, P., Sundaresan, P., Chen, Q., Vuong, Q., Rafailov, R., Tian, R., Doshi, R., Martín-Martín, R., Baijal, R., Scalise, R., Hendrix, R., Lin, R., Qian, R., Zhang, R., Mendonca, R., Shah, R., Hoque, R., Julian, R., Bustamante, S., Kirmani, S., Levine, S., Lin, S., Moore, S., Bahl, S., Dass, S., Sonawani, S., Tulsiani, S., Song, S., Xu, S., Haldar, S., Karamcheti, S., Adebola, S., Guist, S., Nasiriany, S., Schaal, S., Welker, S., Tian, S., Ramamoorthy, S., Dasari, S., Belkhale, S., Park, S., Nair, S., Mirchandani, S., Osa, T., Gupta, T., Harada, T., Matsushima, T., Xiao, T., Kollar, T., Yu, T., Ding, T., Davchev, T., Zhao, T. Z., Armstrong, T., Darrell, T., Chung, T., Jain, V., Kumar, V., Vanhoucke, V., Guizilini, V., Zhan, W., Zhou, W., Burgard, W., Chen, X., Chen, X., Wang, X., Zhu, X., Geng, X., Liu, X., Liangwei, X., Li, X., Pang, Y., Lu, Y., Ma, Y. J., Kim, Y., Chebotar, Y., Zhou, Y., Zhu, Y., Wu, Y., Xu, Y., Wang, Y., Bisk, Y., Dou, Y., Cho, Y., Lee, Y., Cui, Y., Cao, Y., Wu, Y.-H., Tang, Y., Zhu, Y., Zhang, Y., Jiang, Y., Li, Y., Li, Y., Iwasawa, Y., Matsuo, Y., Ma, Z., Xu, Z., Cui, Z. J., Zhang, Z., Fu, Z., & Lin, Z.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- University of Washington (US)
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE)
- Google (United States) (US)
- Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence (US)
- Stanford University (US)
- Microsoft (United States) (US)
- Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
- University of California, Davis (US)
- Toyota Research Institute (US)
- Queensland University of Technology (AU)
- Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
- University of Freiburg (DE)
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Imperial College London (GB)
- Italian Institute of Technology (IT)
- New York University (US)
- University of Southern California (US)
- University of California San Diego (US)
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- Université de Montréal (CA)
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- Arizona State University (US)
- The University of Tokyo (JP)
- Columbia University (US)
- Technische Universität Darmstadt (DE)
- École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- RIKEN (JP)
- University of Technology Nuremberg (DE)
- ORCID
- Padalkar, Abhishek
- Gupta, Agrim
- Mandlekar, Ajay
- Bewley, Alex
- Garg, Animesh
- Xie, Annie
- Raffin, Antonin
- Burgess-Limerick, Ben
- Kim, Beomjoon
- Schölkopf, Bernhard
- Wulfe, Blake
- Ichter, Brian
- Lu, Cewu
- Finn, Chelsea
- Xu, Chenfeng
- Chi, Cheng
- Huang, Chenguang
- Agia, Christopher
- Xu, Danfei
- Driess, Danny
- Pathak, Deepak
- Shah, Dhruv
- Büchler, Dieter
- Sadigh, Dorsa
- Johns, Edward
- Foster, Ethan
- Ceola, Federico
- Xia, Fei
- Stulp, Freek
- Zhou, Gaoyue
- Sukhatme, Gaurav S.
- Salhotra, Gautam
- Yan, Ge
- Berseth, Glen
- Kahn, Gregory
- Wang, Guanzhi
- Su, Hao
- Fang, Hao-Shu
- Shi, Haochen
- Amor, Heni Ben
- Christensen, Henrik I
- Furuta, Hiroki
- Fang, Hongjie
- Radosavovic, Ilija
- Leal, Isabel
- Liang, Jacky
- Abou-Chakra, Jad
- Peters, Jan
- Hsu, Jasmine
- Bohg, Jeannette
- Gao, Jensen
- Wu, Jiajun
- Wu, Jialin
- Sun, Jiankai
- Gu, Jiayuan
- Tan, Jie
- Oh, Jihoon
- Malik, Jitendra
- Silvério, João
- Hejna, Joey
- Yang, Jonathan
- Lim, Joseph J.
- Hausman, Karol
- Go, Keegan
- Goldberg, Ken
- Kawaharazuka, Kento
- Zhang, Kevin
- Rana, Krishan
- Srinivasan, Krishnan
- Fang, Kuan
- Chen, Lawrence Yunliang
- Pinto, Lerrel
- Fei-Fei, Li
- Ott, Lionel
- Lee, Lisa
- Tomizuka, Masayoshi
- Itkina, Masha
- Yip, Michael C.
- Zhang, Mingtong
- Ding, Mingyu
- Sharma, Mohit
- Kanazawa, Naoaki
- Hansen, Nicklas
- Heess, Nicolas
- Shafiullah, Nur Muhammad Mahi
- Mees, Oier
- Kroemer, Oliver
- Bastani, Osbert
- Wohlhart, Paul
- Xu, Peng
- Abbeel, Pieter
- Vuong, Quan
- Tian, Ran
- Martín-Martín, Roberto
- Zhang, Ruohan
- Hoque, Ryan
- Levine, Sergey
- Song, Shuran
- Haldar, Siddhant
- Karamcheti, Siddharth
- Adebola, Simeon
- Tian, Stephen
- Dasari, Sudeep
- Belkhale, Suneel
- Nair, Suraj
- Osa, Takayuki
- Harada, Tatsuya
- Matsushima, Tatsuya
- Kollar, Thomas
- Davchev, Todor
- Darrell, Trevor
- Jain, Vidhi
- Vanhoucke, Vincent
- Zhan, Wei
- Zhou, Wenxuan
- Burgard, Wolfram
- Wang, Xiaolong
- Zhu, Xinghao
- Li, Xuanlin
- Lu, Yao
- Zhu, Yifeng
- Xu, Ying
- Wang, Yixuan
- Bisk, Yonatan
- Cho, Yoonyoung
- Lee, Youngwoon
- Cui, Yuchen
- Wu, Yueh-Hua
- Tang, Yujin
- Zhu, Yuke
- Jiang, Yunfan
- Li, Yunzhu
- Iwasawa, Yusuke
- Matsuo, Yutaka
- Xu, Zhuo
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2310.08864
- OpenAlex
- W4387764390
- Cited by
- 111
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 2 · 2019: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- robot learning, robotic manipulation, transfer learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review