PreprintCited by 111Robot Manipulation and LearningReinforcement Learning in RoboticsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Open X-Embodiment: Robotic Learning Datasets and RT-X Models

Open access
Embodiment Collaboration, O'Neill, Abby, Rehman, Abdul, Gupta, Abhinav, Maddukuri, Abhiram, Gupta, Abhishek, Padalkar, Abhishek, Lee, Abraham +286 more·2023·arXiv

Abstract

Large, high-capacity models trained on diverse datasets have shown remarkable successes on efficiently tackling downstream applications. In domains from NLP to Computer Vision, this has led to a consolidation of pretrained models, with general pretrained backbones serving as a starting point for many applications. Can such a consolidation happen in robotics? Conventionally, robotic learning methods train a separate model for every application, every robot, and even every environment. Can we instead train generalist X-robot policy that can be adapted efficiently to new robots, tasks, and environments? In this paper, we provide datasets in standardized data formats and models to make it possible to explore this possibility in the context of robotic manipulation, alongside experimental results that provide an example of effective X-robot policies. We assemble a dataset from 22 different robots collected through a collaboration between 21 institutions, demonstrating 527 skills (160266 tasks). We show that a high-capacity model trained on this data, which we call RT-X, exhibits positive transfer and improves the capabilities of multiple robots by leveraging experience from other platforms. More details can be found on the project website https://robotics-transformer-x.github.io.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2310.08864

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • RT-2-X trains a 55B-parameter VLA policy on the Open X-Embodiment dataset and demonstrates state-of-the-art generalist manipulation policy performance.

    “RT-2-X [1] trains a 55B-parameter VLA policy on the Open X-Embodiment dataset and demonstrates state-of-the-art generalist manipulation policy performance.”

    From OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Model (2024) · cites this paper as [1]

    The Policy architectures and Training and inference details sections identify RT-2-X as a vision-language-action policy and report a 55B-parameter version trained on a robotics data mixture. But Training and inference details specifies that this mixture covered 9 embodiments, not the full 22-embodiment Open X-Embodiment dataset. The reported strong performance and cross-robot transfer support the general thrust of the claim, but the unqualified state-of-the-art generalist performance claim exceeds the specific comparisons reported; page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Prior transformer-based policy designs typically encode input images with large ResNet-style encoders and fuse the resulting image features with a comparatively small transformer.

    “Prior transformer-based policy designs typically encode input images with large ResNetstyle [32] encoders and fuse the resulting image features with a comparatively small transformer [10, 67, 81, 17, 98, 61, 83].”

    From Octo: An Open-Source Generalist Robot Policy (2024) · cites this paper as [67]

    The Policy architectures section (page unavailable) describes RT-1 images being encoded by EfficientNet, combined with language features, and fed as tokens to a transformer. This supports the encoder-to-transformer design, but the paper does not establish that the transformer is comparatively small or that this design is typical; its other model, RT-2-X, uses a ViT visual backbone. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The robots and tasks in open-source datasets typically have one or two cameras and use low-frequency control, between 2 and 10 Hz.

    “The robots and tasks in these datasets typically have one or two cameras and use lowfrequency control, between 2 and 10 Hz.”

    From $π_0$: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Control (2024) · cites this paper as [10]

    The Data format consolidation section says the models select one camera view from each dataset, but it does not establish that the robots or tasks typically have one or two cameras. Training and inference details reports a 3–10 Hz inference rate for the models, not a typical 2–10 Hz control range across the datasets. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • OpenVLA is a 7B-parameter open-source vision-language-action model trained on 970k robot demonstrations from the Open X-Embodiment dataset.

    “we introduce OpenVLA, a 7B-parameter open-source VLA trained on a diverse collection of 970k real-world robot demonstrations.”

    From OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Model (2024) · cites this paper as [1]

    Section A, “The Open X-Embodiment Dataset” (page unavailable), describes a diverse collection of more than one million real-robot trajectories, supporting the identification of the dataset. It does not establish that OpenVLA is a 7B-parameter open-source model or that it was trained on exactly 970k demonstrations from this dataset. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Even the largest robot manipulation datasets only have 100K to 1M examples.

    “even the largest robot manipulation datasets [1, 11] only have 100K to 1M examples”

    From OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Model (2024) · cites this paper as [1]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says that even the largest robot data-collection efforts produce datasets much smaller than major vision and NLP benchmarks, supporting the claim's general point. But the paper does not give a 100K–1M range for the largest manipulation datasets; its Open X-Embodiment Dataset section (page unavailable) reports more than 1M real-robot trajectories. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 106

  1. A. Radford, J. W. Kim, C. Hallacy, A. Ramesh, G. Goh, S. Agarwal, G. Sastry, A. Askell, P. Mishkin, J. Clark et al., "Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision," in International conference on machine learning. PMLR, 2021, pp. 8748-8763.
  2. R. Anil, A. M. Dai, O. Firat, M. Johnson, D. Lepikhin, A. Passos, S. Shakeri, E. Taropa, P. Bailey, Z. Chen et al., "PaLM 2 technical report," arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.10403, 2023. · arXiv
  3. T. Weyand, A. Araujo, B. Cao, and J. Sim, "Google landmarks dataset v2 -a large-scale benchmark for instance-level recognition and retrieval," in Proceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), June 2020.
  4. B. Wu, W. Chen, Y. Fan, Y. Zhang, J. Hou, J. Liu, and T. Zhang, "Tencent ML-images: A large-scale multi-label image database for visual representation learning," IEEE Access, vol. 7, 2019.
  5. J. Lehmann, R. Isele, M. Jakob, A. Jentzsch, D. Kontokostas, P. N. Mendes, S. Hellmann, M. Morsey, P. van Kleef, S. Auer, and C. Bizer, "DBpedia -a large-scale, multilingual knowledge base extracted from wikipedia." Semantic Web, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 167-195, 2015. [Online]. Available: http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/journals/semweb/ semweb6.html#LehmannIJJKMHMK15
  6. H. Mühleisen and C. Bizer, "Web data commons- extracting structured data from two large web cor- pora." LDOW, vol. 937, pp. 133-145, 2012.
  7. A. Brohan, N. Brown, J. Carbajal, Y. Chebotar, X. Chen, K. Choromanski, T. Ding, D. Driess, A. Dubey, C. Finn et al., "RT-2: Vision-language- action models transfer web knowledge to robotic con- trol," arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.15818, 2023. · arXiv
  8. C. Devin, A. Gupta, T. Darrell, P. Abbeel, and S. Levine, "Learning modular neural network policies for multi-task and multi-robot transfer," in 2017 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2017, pp. 2169-2176.
  9. T. Chen, A. Murali, and A. Gupta, "Hardware con- ditioned policies for multi-robot transfer learning," in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2018, pp. 9355-9366.
  10. A. Sanchez-Gonzalez, N. Heess, J. T. Springenberg, J. Merel, M. Riedmiller, R. Hadsell, and P. Battaglia, "Graph networks as learnable physics engines for inference and control," in Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning, ser. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, J. Dy and A. Krause, Eds., vol. 80. PMLR, 10-15 Jul 2018, pp. 4470-4479. [Online]. Available: https:// proceedings.mlr.press/v80/sanchez-gonzalez18a.html
  11. D. Pathak, C. Lu, T. Darrell, P. Isola, and A. A. Efros, "Learning to control self-assembling morphologies: a study of generalization via modularity," Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 32, 2019.
  12. R. Martín-Martín, M. Lee, R. Gardner, S. Savarese, J. Bohg, and A. Garg, "Variable impedance control in end-effector space. an action space for reinforcement learning in contact rich tasks," in Proceedings of the International Conference of Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2019.
  13. W. Huang, I. Mordatch, and D. Pathak, "One policy to control them all: Shared modular policies for agent- agnostic control," in ICML, 2020.
  14. V. Kurin, M. Igl, T. Rocktäschel, W. Boehmer, and S. Whiteson, "My body is a cage: the role of mor- phology in graph-based incompatible control," arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.01856, 2020. · arXiv
  15. K. Zakka, A. Zeng, P. Florence, J. Tompson, J. Bohg, and D. Dwibedi, "XIRL: Cross-embodiment inverse reinforcement learning," Conference on Robot Learn- ing (CoRL), 2021.
  16. A. Ghadirzadeh, X. Chen, P. Poklukar, C. Finn, M. Björkman, and D. Kragic, "Bayesian meta-learning for few-shot policy adaptation across robotic plat- forms," in 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, 2021, pp. 1274-1280.
  17. A. Gupta, L. Fan, S. Ganguli, and L. Fei-Fei, "Meta- morph: Learning universal controllers with transform- ers," in International Conference on Learning Repre- sentations, 2021.
  18. D. Shah, A. Sridhar, A. Bhorkar, N. Hirose, and S. Levine, "GNM: A general navigation model to drive any robot," in 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2023, pp. 7226-7233.
  19. Y. Zhou, S. Sonawani, M. Phielipp, S. Stepputtis, and H. Amor, "Modularity through attention: Efficient training and transfer of language-conditioned policies for robot manipulation," in Proceedings of The 6th Conference on Robot Learning, ser. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, K. Liu, D. Kulic, and J. Ichnowski, Eds., vol. 205. PMLR, 14- 18 Dec 2023, pp. 1684-1695. [Online]. Available: https://proceedings.mlr.press/v205/zhou23b.html
  20. S. Dasari, F. Ebert, S. Tian, S. Nair, B. Bucher, K. Schmeckpeper, S. Singh, S. Levine, and C. Finn, "RoboNet: Large-scale multi-robot learning," in Con- ference on Robot Learning (CoRL), vol. 100. PMLR, 2019, pp. 885-897.
  21. E. S. Hu, K. Huang, O. Rybkin, and D. Jayaraman, "Know thyself: Transferable visual control policies through robot-awareness," in International Conference on Learning Representations, 2022.
  22. K. Bousmalis, G. Vezzani, D. Rao, C. Devin, A. X. Lee, M. Bauza, T. Davchev, Y. Zhou, A. Gupta, A. Raju et al., "RoboCat: A self-improving founda- tion agent for robotic manipulation," arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.11706, 2023. · arXiv
  23. J. Yang, D. Sadigh, and C. Finn, "Polybot: Training one policy across robots while embracing variability," arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.03719, 2023. · arXiv
  24. S. Reed, K. Zolna, E. Parisotto, S. G. Colmenarejo, A. Novikov, G. Barth-maron, M. Giménez, Y. Sul- sky, J. Kay, J. T. Springenberg, T. Eccles, J. Bruce, A. Razavi, A. Edwards, N. Heess, Y. Chen, R. Had- sell, O. Vinyals, M. Bordbar, and N. de Freitas, "A generalist agent," Transactions on Machine Learning Research, 2022.
  25. G. Salhotra, I.-C. A. Liu, and G. Sukhatme, "Bridging action space mismatch in learning from demonstra- tions," arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.03833, 2023. · arXiv
  26. I. Radosavovic, B. Shi, L. Fu, K. Goldberg, T. Darrell, and J. Malik, "Robot learning with sensorimotor pre- training," in Conference on Robot Learning, 2023.
  27. L. Shao, F. Ferreira, M. Jorda, V. Nambiar, J. Luo, E. Solowjow, J. A. Ojea, O. Khatib, and J. Bohg, "UniGrasp: Learning a unified model to grasp with multifingered robotic hands," IEEE Robotics and Au- tomation Letters, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 2286-2293, 2020.
  28. Z. Xu, B. Qi, S. Agrawal, and S. Song, "Adagrasp: Learning an adaptive gripper-aware grasping policy," in 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2021, pp. 4620-4626.
  29. D. Shah, A. Sridhar, N. Dashora, K. Stachowicz, K. Black, N. Hirose, and S. Levine, "ViNT: A Foun- dation Model for Visual Navigation," in 7th Annual Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL), 2023.
  30. Y. Liu, A. Gupta, P. Abbeel, and S. Levine, "Imitation from observation: Learning to imitate behaviors from raw video via context translation," in 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2018, pp. 1118-1125.
  31. P. Sharma, D. Pathak, and A. Gupta, "Third-person visual imitation learning via decoupled hierarchical controller," Advances in Neural Information Process- ing Systems, vol. 32, 2019.
  32. L. Smith, N. Dhawan, M. Zhang, P. Abbeel, and S. Levine, "Avid: Learning multi-stage tasks via pixel- level translation of human videos," arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.04443, 2019. · arXiv
  33. A. Bonardi, S. James, and A. J. Davison, "Learning one-shot imitation from humans without humans," IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 3533-3539, 2020.
  34. K. Schmeckpeper, O. Rybkin, K. Daniilidis, S. Levine, and C. Finn, "Reinforcement learning with videos: Combining offline observations with interaction," in Conference on Robot Learning. PMLR, 2021, pp. 339-354.
  35. H. Xiong, Q. Li, Y.-C. Chen, H. Bharadhwaj, S. Sinha, and A. Garg, "Learning by watching: Physical imita- tion of manipulation skills from human videos," in 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelli- gent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, 2021, pp. 7827-7834.
  36. E. Jang, A. Irpan, M. Khansari, D. Kappler, F. Ebert, C. Lynch, S. Levine, and C. Finn, "BC-Z: Zero-shot task generalization with robotic imitation learning," in Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL), 2021, pp. 991-1002.
  37. M. Ding, Y. Xu, Z. Chen, D. D. Cox, P. Luo, J. B. Tenenbaum, and C. Gan, "Embodied concept learner: Self-supervised learning of concepts and map- ping through instruction following," in Conference on Robot Learning. PMLR, 2023, pp. 1743-1754.
  38. S. Bahl, R. Mendonca, L. Chen, U. Jain, and D. Pathak, "Affordances from human videos as a versatile representation for robotics," in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), June 2023, pp. 13 778- 13 790.
  39. P. Sermanet, K. Xu, and S. Levine, "Unsupervised per- ceptual rewards for imitation learning," arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.06699, 2016. · arXiv
  40. L. Shao, T. Migimatsu, Q. Zhang, K. Yang, and J. Bohg, "Concept2Robot: Learning manipulation con- cepts from instructions and human demonstrations," in Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems (RSS), 2020.
  41. A. S. Chen, S. Nair, and C. Finn, "Learning generaliz- able robotic reward functions from "in-the-wild" hu- man videos," arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.16817, 2021. · arXiv
  42. S. Kumar, J. Zamora, N. Hansen, R. Jangir, and X. Wang, "Graph inverse reinforcement learning from diverse videos," in Conference on Robot Learning. PMLR, 2023, pp. 55-66.
  43. M. Alakuijala, G. Dulac-Arnold, J. Mairal, J. Ponce, and C. Schmid, "Learning reward functions for robotic manipulation by observing humans," in 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2023, pp. 5006-5012.
  44. C. Wang, L. Fan, J. Sun, R. Zhang, L. Fei-Fei, D. Xu, Y. Zhu, and A. Anandkumar, "Mimicplay: Long- horizon imitation learning by watching human play," in Conference on Robot Learning, 2023.
  45. K. Schmeckpeper, A. Xie, O. Rybkin, S. Tian, K. Daniilidis, S. Levine, and C. Finn, "Learning pre- dictive models from observation and interaction," in European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 2020, pp. 708-725.
  46. S. Nair, A. Rajeswaran, V. Kumar, C. Finn, and A. Gupta, "R3m: A universal visual representation for robot manipulation," in CoRL, 2022.
  47. T. Xiao, I. Radosavovic, T. Darrell, and J. Malik, "Masked visual pre-training for motor control," arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.06173, 2022. · arXiv
  48. I. Radosavovic, T. Xiao, S. James, P. Abbeel, J. Ma- lik, and T. Darrell, "Real-world robot learning with masked visual pre-training," in Conference on Robot Learning, 2022.
  49. Y. J. Ma, S. Sodhani, D. Jayaraman, O. Bastani, V. Kumar, and A. Zhang, "Vip: Towards universal visual reward and representation via value-implicit pre-training," arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.00030, 2022. · arXiv
  50. A. Majumdar, K. Yadav, S. Arnaud, Y. J. Ma, C. Chen, S. Silwal, A. Jain, V.-P. Berges, P. Abbeel, J. Malik et al., "Where are we in the search for an artificial vi- sual cortex for embodied intelligence?" arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.18240, 2023. · arXiv
  51. Y. Mu, S. Yao, M. Ding, P. Luo, and C. Gan, "EC2: Emergent communication for embodied control," in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2023, pp. 6704- 6714.
  52. S. Bahl, R. Mendonca, L. Chen, U. Jain, and D. Pathak, "Affordances from human videos as a versatile representation for robotics," in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2023, pp. 13 778-13 790.
  53. Y. Jiang, S. Moseson, and A. Saxena, "Efficient grasping from RGBD images: Learning using a new rectangle representation," in 2011 IEEE International conference on robotics and automation. IEEE, 2011, pp. 3304-3311.
  54. L. Pinto and A. K. Gupta, "Supersizing self- supervision: Learning to grasp from 50k tries and 700 robot hours," 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 3406-3413, 2015.
  55. D. Kappler, J. Bohg, and S. Schaal, "Leveraging big data for grasp planning," in ICRA, 2015, pp. 4304- 4311.
  56. A. Depierre, E. Dellandréa, and L. Chen, "Jacquard: A large scale dataset for robotic grasp detection," in 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelli- gent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, 2018, pp. 3511-3516.
  57. S. Levine, P. Pastor, A. Krizhevsky, J. Ibarz, and D. Quillen, "Learning hand-eye coordination for robotic grasping with deep learning and large-scale data collection," The International journal of robotics research, vol. 37, no. 4-5, pp. 421-436, 2018.
  58. D. Kalashnikov, A. Irpan, P. Pastor, J. Ibarz, A. Her- zog, E. Jang, D. Quillen, E. Holly, M. Kalakrishnan, V. Vanhoucke et al., "QT-Opt: Scalable deep rein- forcement learning for vision-based robotic manipu- lation," arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.10293, 2018. · arXiv
  59. H.-S. Fang, C. Wang, M. Gou, and C. Lu, "Graspnet- 1billion: a large-scale benchmark for general object grasping," in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2020, pp. 11 444-11 453.
  60. C. Eppner, A. Mousavian, and D. Fox, "ACRONYM: A large-scale grasp dataset based on simulation," in 2021 IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, ICRA, 2020.
  61. K. Bousmalis, A. Irpan, P. Wohlhart, Y. Bai, M. Kel- cey, M. Kalakrishnan, L. Downs, J. Ibarz, P. Pastor, K. Konolige, S. Levine, and V. Vanhoucke, "Using simulation and domain adaptation to improve effi- ciency of deep robotic grasping," in ICRA, 2018, pp. 4243-4250.
  62. K.-T. Yu, M. Bauza, N. Fazeli, and A. Rodriguez, "More than a million ways to be pushed. a high- fidelity experimental dataset of planar pushing," in 2016 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS). IEEE, 2016, pp. 30-37.
  63. C. Finn and S. Levine, "Deep visual foresight for plan- ning robot motion," in 2017 IEEE International Con- ference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2017, pp. 2786-2793.
  64. F. Ebert, C. Finn, S. Dasari, A. Xie, A. Lee, and S. Levine, "Visual foresight: Model-based deep rein- forcement learning for vision-based robotic control," arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.00568, 2018. · arXiv
  65. P. Shilane, P. Min, M. Kazhdan, and T. Funkhouser, "The princeton shape benchmark," in Shape Modeling Applications, 2004, pp. 167-388.
  66. W. Wohlkinger, A. Aldoma Buchaca, R. Rusu, and M. Vincze, "3DNet: Large-Scale Object Class Recog- nition from CAD Models," in IEEE International Con- ference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2012.
  67. A. Kasper, Z. Xue, and R. Dillmann, "The kit object models database: An object model database for object recognition, localization and manipulation in service robotics," The International Journal of Robotics Re- search, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 927-934, 2012.
  68. A. Singh, J. Sha, K. S. Narayan, T. Achim, and P. Abbeel, "BigBIRD: A large-scale 3D database of object instances," in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2014, pp. 509- 516.
  69. B. Calli, A. Walsman, A. Singh, S. Srinivasa, P. Abbeel, and A. M. Dollar, "Benchmarking in ma- nipulation research: Using the Yale-CMU-Berkeley object and model set," IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 36-52, 2015.
  70. Zhirong Wu, S. Song, A. Khosla, Fisher Yu, Linguang Zhang, Xiaoou Tang, and J. Xiao, "3D ShapeNets: A deep representation for volumetric shapes," in IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recogni- tion (CVPR), 2015, pp. 1912-1920.
  71. Y. Xiang, W. Kim, W. Chen, J. Ji, C. Choy, H. Su, R. Mottaghi, L. Guibas, and S. Savarese, "Object- Net3D: A large scale database for 3d object recog- nition," in European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV). Springer, 2016, pp. 160-176.
  72. D. Morrison, P. Corke, and J. Leitner, "Egad! an evolved grasping analysis dataset for diversity and re- producibility in robotic manipulation," IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 4368-4375, 2020.
  73. R. Gao, Y.-Y. Chang, S. Mall, L. Fei-Fei, and J. Wu, "ObjectFolder: A dataset of objects with implicit vi- sual, auditory, and tactile representations," in Confer- ence on Robot Learning, 2021, pp. 466-476.
  74. L. Downs, A. Francis, N. Koenig, B. Kinman, R. Hick- man, K. Reymann, T. B. McHugh, and V. Vanhoucke, "Google scanned objects: A high-quality dataset of 3D scanned household items," in 2022 International Con- ference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2022, pp. 2553-2560.
  75. D. Kalashnikov, J. Varley, Y. Chebotar, B. Swan- son, R. Jonschkowski, C. Finn, S. Levine, and K. Hausman, "MT-Opt: Continuous multi-task robotic reinforcement learning at scale," arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.08212, 2021. · arXiv
  76. A. Mandlekar, Y. Zhu, A. Garg, J. Booher, M. Spero, A. Tung, J. Gao, J. Emmons, A. Gupta, E. Orbay, S. Savarese, and L. Fei-Fei, "RoboTurk: A crowdsourcing platform for robotic skill learning through imitation," CoRR, vol. abs/1811.02790, 2018. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1811.02790 · arXiv
  77. P. Sharma, L. Mohan, L. Pinto, and A. Gupta, "Mul- tiple interactions made easy (MIME): Large scale demonstrations data for imitation," in Conference on robot learning. PMLR, 2018, pp. 906-915.
  78. A. Mandlekar, J. Booher, M. Spero, A. Tung, A. Gupta, Y. Zhu, A. Garg, S. Savarese, and L. Fei- Fei, "Scaling robot supervision to hundreds of hours with RoboTurk: Robotic manipulation dataset through human reasoning and dexterity," in 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, 2019, pp. 1048-1055.
  79. A. Mandlekar, D. Xu, J. Wong, S. Nasiriany, C. Wang, R. Kulkarni, L. Fei-Fei, S. Savarese, Y. Zhu, and R. Martín-Martín, "What matters in learning from offline human demonstrations for robot manipulation," in arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.03298, 2021. · arXiv
  80. C. Lynch, A. Wahid, J. Tompson, T. Ding, J. Betker, R. Baruch, T. Armstrong, and P. Florence, "Interac- tive language: Talking to robots in real time," IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2023.
  81. H.-S. Fang, H. Fang, Z. Tang, J. Liu, J. Wang, H. Zhu, and C. Lu, "RH20T: A robotic dataset for learning diverse skills in one-shot," in RSS 2023 Workshop on Learning for Task and Motion Planning, 2023.
  82. H. Bharadhwaj, J. Vakil, M. Sharma, A. Gupta, S. Tul- siani, and V. Kumar, "RoboAgent: Towards sample efficient robot manipulation with semantic augmenta- tions and action chunking," arxiv, 2023.
  83. T. Winograd, "Understanding natural language," Cognitive Psychology, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1-191, 1972. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/0010028572900023
  84. M. MacMahon, B. Stankiewicz, and B. Kuipers, "Walk the talk: Connecting language, knowledge, and action in route instructions," in Proceedings of the Twenty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelli- gence, 2006.
  85. T. Kollar, S. Tellex, D. Roy, and N. Roy, "Toward understanding natural language directions," in 2010 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human- Robot Interaction (HRI), 2010, pp. 259-266.
  86. D. L. Chen and R. J. Mooney, "Learning to interpret natural language navigation instructions from observa- tions," in Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth AAAI Con- ference on Artificial Intelligence, 2011, p. 859-865.
  87. F. Duvallet, J. Oh, A. Stentz, M. Walter, T. Howard, S. Hemachandra, S. Teller, and N. Roy, "Inferring maps and behaviors from natural language instruc- tions," in International Symposium on Experimental Robotics (ISER), 2014.
  88. J. Luketina, N. Nardelli, G. Farquhar, J. N. Foer- ster, J. Andreas, E. Grefenstette, S. Whiteson, and T. Rocktäschel, "A survey of reinforcement learning informed by natural language," in IJCAI, 2019.
  89. S. Stepputtis, J. Campbell, M. Phielipp, S. Lee, C. Baral, and H. Ben Amor, "Language-conditioned imitation learning for robot manipulation tasks," Ad- vances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 33, pp. 13 139-13 150, 2020.
  90. S. Nair, E. Mitchell, K. Chen, S. Savarese, C. Finn et al., "Learning language-conditioned robot behavior from offline data and crowd-sourced annotation," in Conference on Robot Learning. PMLR, 2022, pp. 1303-1315.
  91. O. Mees, L. Hermann, E. Rosete-Beas, and W. Burgard, "CALVIN: A benchmark for language- conditioned policy learning for long-horizon robot manipulation tasks," IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2022.
  92. O. Mees, L. Hermann, and W. Burgard, "What matters in language conditioned robotic imitation learning over unstructured data," IEEE Robotics and Automa- tion Letters, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 11 205-11 212, 2022.
  93. M. Shridhar, L. Manuelli, and D. Fox, "Perceiver- actor: A multi-task transformer for robotic manipu- lation," Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL), 2022.
  94. F. Hill, S. Mokra, N. Wong, and T. Harley, "Human instruction-following with deep reinforcement learn- ing via transfer-learning from text," arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.09382, 2020. · arXiv
  95. M. Ahn, A. Brohan, N. Brown, Y. Chebotar, O. Cortes, B. David, C. Finn, K. Gopalakrishnan, K. Hausman, A. Herzog et al., "Do as I can, not as I say: Grounding language in robotic affordances," Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL), 2022.
  96. Y. Jiang, A. Gupta, Z. Zhang, G. Wang, Y. Dou, Y. Chen, L. Fei-Fei, A. Anandkumar, Y. Zhu, and L. Fan, "VIMA: General robot manipulation with multimodal prompts," International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2023.
  97. S. Vemprala, R. Bonatti, A. Bucker, and A. Kapoor, "ChatGPT for robotics: Design principles and model abilities," Microsoft Auton. Syst. Robot. Res, vol. 2, p. 20, 2023.
  98. W. Huang, C. Wang, R. Zhang, Y. Li, J. Wu, and L. Fei-Fei, "VoxPoser: Composable 3d value maps for robotic manipulation with language models," arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.05973, 2023. · arXiv
  99. M. Shridhar, L. Manuelli, and D. Fox, "Cliport: What and where pathways for robotic manipulation," in Conference on Robot Learning. PMLR, 2022, pp. 894-906.
  100. A. Stone, T. Xiao, Y. Lu, K. Gopalakrishnan, K.-H. Lee, Q. Vuong, P. Wohlhart, B. Zitkovich, F. Xia, C. Finn et al., "Open-world object manipulation using pre-trained vision-language models," arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.00905, 2023. · arXiv
  101. Y. Mu, Q. Zhang, M. Hu, W. Wang, M. Ding, J. Jin, B. Wang, J. Dai, Y. Qiao, and P. Luo, "EmbodiedGPT: Vision-language pre-training via embodied chain of thought," arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.15021, 2023. · arXiv
  102. M. Tan and Q. Le, "EfficientNet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks," in Inter- national conference on machine learning. PMLR, 2019, pp. 6105-6114.
  103. A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, Ł. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin, "Attention is all you need," Advances in neural infor- mation processing systems, vol. 30, 2017.
  104. E. Rosete-Beas, O. Mees, G. Kalweit, J. Boedecker, and W. Burgard, "Latent plans for task agnostic offline reinforcement learning," in Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL), 2022.
  105. O. Mees, J. Borja-Diaz, and W. Burgard, "Grounding language with visual affordances over unstructured data," in Proceedings of the IEEE International Con- ference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), London, UK, 2023.
  106. J. Luo, C. Xu, X. Geng, G. Feng, K. Fang, L. Tan, S. Schaal, and S. Levine, "Multi-stage cable rout- ing through hierarchical imitation learning," arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.08927, 2023. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Embodiment Collaboration, O'Neill, A., Rehman, A., Gupta, A., Maddukuri, A., Gupta, A., Padalkar, A., Lee, A., Pooley, A., Gupta, A., Mandlekar, A., Jain, A., Tung, A., Bewley, A., Herzog, A., Irpan, A., Khazatsky, A., Rai, A., Gupta, A., Wang, A., Kolobov, A., Singh, A., Garg, A., Kembhavi, A., Xie, A., Brohan, A., Raffin, A., Sharma, A., Yavary, A., Jain, A., Balakrishna, A., Wahid, A., Burgess-Limerick, B., Kim, B., Schölkopf, B., Wulfe, B., Ichter, B., Lu, C., Xu, C., Le, C., Finn, C., Wang, C., Xu, C., Chi, C., Huang, C., Chan, C., Agia, C., Pan, C., Fu, C., Devin, C., Xu, D., Morton, D., Driess, D., Chen, D., Pathak, D., Shah, D., Büchler, D., Jayaraman, D., Kalashnikov, D., Sadigh, D., Johns, E., Foster, E., Liu, F., Ceola, F., Xia, F., Zhao, F., Frujeri, F. V., Stulp, F., Zhou, G., Sukhatme, G. S., Salhotra, G., Yan, G., Feng, G., Schiavi, G., Berseth, G., Kahn, G., Yang, G., Wang, G., Su, H., Fang, H.-S., Shi, H., Bao, H., Amor, H. B., Christensen, H. I., Furuta, H., Bharadhwaj, H., Walke, H., Fang, H., Ha, H., Mordatch, I., Radosavovic, I., Leal, I., Liang, J., Abou-Chakra, J., Kim, J., Drake, J., Peters, J., Schneider, J., Hsu, J., Vakil, J., Bohg, J., Bingham, J., Wu, J., Gao, J., Hu, J., Wu, J., Wu, J., Sun, J., Luo, J., Gu, J., Tan, J., Oh, J., Wu, J., Lu, J., Yang, J., Malik, J., Silvério, J., Hejna, J., Booher, J., Tompson, J., Yang, J., Salvador, J., Lim, J. J., Han, J., Wang, K., Rao, K., Pertsch, K., Hausman, K., Go, K., Gopalakrishnan, K., Goldberg, K., Byrne, K., Oslund, K., Kawaharazuka, K., Black, K., Lin, K., Zhang, K., Ehsani, K., Lekkala, K., Ellis, K., Rana, K., Srinivasan, K., Fang, K., Singh, K. P., Zeng, K.-H., Hatch, K., Hsu, K., Itti, L., Chen, L. Y., Pinto, L., Fei-Fei, L., Tan, L., Fan, L. "., Ott, L., Lee, L., Weihs, L., Chen, M., Lepert, M., Memmel, M., Tomizuka, M., Itkina, M., Castro, M. G., Spero, M., Du, M., Ahn, M., Yip, M. C., Zhang, M., Ding, M., Heo, M., Srirama, M. K., Sharma, M., Kim, M. J., Irshad, M. Z., Kanazawa, N., Hansen, N., Heess, N., Joshi, N. J., Suenderhauf, N., Liu, N., Di Palo, N., Shafiullah, N. M. M., Mees, O., Kroemer, O., Bastani, O., Sanketi, P. R., Miller, P. "., Yin, P., Wohlhart, P., Xu, P., Fagan, P. D., Mitrano, P., Sermanet, P., Abbeel, P., Sundaresan, P., Chen, Q., Vuong, Q., Rafailov, R., Tian, R., Doshi, R., Martín-Martín, R., Baijal, R., Scalise, R., Hendrix, R., Lin, R., Qian, R., Zhang, R., Mendonca, R., Shah, R., Hoque, R., Julian, R., Bustamante, S., Kirmani, S., Levine, S., Lin, S., Moore, S., Bahl, S., Dass, S., Sonawani, S., Tulsiani, S., Song, S., Xu, S., Haldar, S., Karamcheti, S., Adebola, S., Guist, S., Nasiriany, S., Schaal, S., Welker, S., Tian, S., Ramamoorthy, S., Dasari, S., Belkhale, S., Park, S., Nair, S., Mirchandani, S., Osa, T., Gupta, T., Harada, T., Matsushima, T., Xiao, T., Kollar, T., Yu, T., Ding, T., Davchev, T., Zhao, T. Z., Armstrong, T., Darrell, T., Chung, T., Jain, V., Kumar, V., Vanhoucke, V., Guizilini, V., Zhan, W., Zhou, W., Burgard, W., Chen, X., Chen, X., Wang, X., Zhu, X., Geng, X., Liu, X., Liangwei, X., Li, X., Pang, Y., Lu, Y., Ma, Y. J., Kim, Y., Chebotar, Y., Zhou, Y., Zhu, Y., Wu, Y., Xu, Y., Wang, Y., Bisk, Y., Dou, Y., Cho, Y., Lee, Y., Cui, Y., Cao, Y., Wu, Y.-H., Tang, Y., Zhu, Y., Zhang, Y., Jiang, Y., Li, Y., Li, Y., Iwasawa, Y., Matsuo, Y., Ma, Z., Xu, Z., Cui, Z. J., Zhang, Z., Fu, Z., & Lin, Z.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE)
  • Google (United States) (US)
  • Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Microsoft (United States) (US)
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • Toyota Research Institute (US)
  • Queensland University of Technology (AU)
  • Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
  • University of Freiburg (DE)
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • Italian Institute of Technology (IT)
  • New York University (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Technische Universität Darmstadt (DE)
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • RIKEN (JP)
  • University of Technology Nuremberg (DE)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2023
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387764390
Cited by
111
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 2 · 2019: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
robot learning, robotic manipulation, transfer learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review