Memento 3: Model-Based Recursive Self-Improvement through Reflective Rulebooks
Open accessAbstract
Learning to act in unfamiliar environments requires agents to infer how the world works and revise that understanding as new evidence arrives. Yet limited observations can support multiple world models that explain past interactions but predict different outcomes in unseen states. We introduce Memento 3, building on the Memento series to enable frozen LLM agents to continually learn explicit world models through external memory. The agent maintains a natural-language rulebook as persistent semantic memory, recording revisable hypotheses about environment dynamics while leaving unknown aspects underspecified. It compiles this rulebook into executable code for prediction and planning. Through a continual loop of observation, reflection, rule revision, compilation, and verification, the agent uses prediction errors to refine both the rulebook and its code. Updated code is accepted only when the LLM judges it faithful to the rulebook and cell-exact replay reproduces the observed transitions. We investigate this process as a model-based route to recursive self-improvement (RSI): the agent autonomously explores the environment, revises its world model, and uses verified updates to guide subsequent interaction and learning, while the underlying LLM remains fixed. A population extension maintains multiple world models in parallel, sharing interaction evidence and using their predictions to guide exploration. On ARC-AGI-3, the single-model agent clears every level of all 25 public games, achieves a mean Relative Human Action Efficiency (RHAE) of 100.0, and uses 44% of the human action count. In an Atari Pong case study, a learned feedback controller wins 21:0 in each of three evaluated episodes with different openings, without further LLM calls.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
MEMENTO 3 enables a frozen LLM agent to continually learn explicit world models as a natural-language rulebook plus compiled executable code, revising both through observation, reflection, rule revision, compilation, and verification. On ARC-AGI-3 it clears all 25 public games with mean RHAE 100.0 using 44% of human actions, and a Pong case study yields a learned controller winning 21:0 in three episodes without LLM calls during execution.
Key findings
- On ARC-AGI-3, the single-model agent clears every level of all 25 public games, reaches mean RHAE 100.0, and uses 7,518 actions, or 0.44 of the 17,135 human baseline; per-game ratios range from 0.20 on m0r0 to 0.67 on lf52 (median 0.42). Compared with Claude Opus 5 using the ARC Prize Standard harness, it achieves a 59.3-point higher mean RHAE.
- Ablating the natural-language rulebook still clears every level and reaches RHAE 100 on the three selected games, but the rulebook variant uses 617 rather than 677 actions (9% reduction) and 678 rather than 830 agent turns (18% reduction) across ft09, ka59, and cn04.
- The population extension at N=2 on wa30 clears all nine levels with RHAE 100 in both arms and reduces total scored actions from 899 to 597 (0.66×), matching or improving per-level action efficiency on eight of nine levels.
- In Atari Pong, the learned feedback controller wins 21:0 in each of three evaluated episodes with different openings, requiring 3,358, 4,014, and 5,039 actions respectively, with a learning cost of 9,504 emulator frames and no LLM calls during evaluation.
Methods
- Design: Code as Model represents the agent’s world-model hypothesis as a persistent natural-language rulebook (`world_model.md`) and an executable Python realisation (`world_model_engine.py`). A frozen LLM (Claude Opus 5, extra-high reasoning effort, run in Claude Code) proposes revisions through a continual loop of observation, reflection, rule revision, compilation, and verification; acceptance requires an LLM rulebook-fidelity check and cell-exact replay of recorded transitions. Git memory stores rulebook and code versions.
- Data/sample: evaluation uses all 25 public ARC-AGI-3 games; ablations use one game per difficulty band (ft09, ka59, cn04); the population extension is tested on wa30 at N=2; Atari Pong uses the Arcade Learning Environment with frame-skip 4. Baselines come from official ARC Prize scorecards and published RL results.
- Analysis: ARC-AGI-3 reports RHAE from Eq. 36 (higher is better, 100 ceiling), action counts, levels cleared, and agent turns; Pong reports episode score (agent points minus opponent, ranging from −21 to +21) and learning cost in emulator frames.
Limitations
- The paper states that public-set completion alone cannot isolate the contribution of a world-model architecture; comparisons must also account for model choice and reasoning budget, and examine action efficiency, repeated-run stability, and held-out evaluation.
- The paper states that the population is a computational approximation to the remaining version space, not a calibrated Bayesian posterior; main experiments use the single-pair setting (N=1), and the population extension is examined only on wa30 at N=2.
- The paper states that ablations are limited to one game per difficulty band because ARC-AGI-3 runs with Claude Code incur substantial time and monetary cost, and that full-frame Pong replay retains residual rendering and paddle-motion errors. Evident from the text: no repeated-run stability or held-out ARC-AGI-3 results are reported, and the Pong evaluation is a single-game case study.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 62 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
Per-game ratios range from 0.20 on m0r0 to 0.67 on lf52 (median 0.42).
“Per-game ratios range from 0.20 on m0r0 to 0.67 on lf52 (median 0.42).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
On ARC-AGI-3, the single-model agent uses 44% of the human action count.
“and uses 44% of the human action count.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
On ARC-AGI-3, the single-model agent clears every level of all 25 public games.
“On ARC-AGI-3, the single-model agent clears every level of all 25 public games,”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
Compared with Claude Opus 5 with the ARC Prize Standard harness, MEMENTO 3 achieves a 59.3-point higher mean RHAE.
“Compared with Claude Opus 5 with the ARC Prize Standard harness [2], our agent achieves a 59.3-point higher mean RHAE.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [2]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingnone given
In an Atari Pong case study, a learned feedback controller wins 21:0 in each of three evaluated episodes with different openings, without further LLM calls.
“In an Atari Pong case study, a learned feedback controller wins 21 : 0 in each of three evaluated episodes with different openings, without further LLM calls.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
The total action count for every game is below its human baseline.
“Table 2 further shows that the total action count for every game is below its human baseline.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Our agent clears all 25 games in 7,518 actions, 0.44 of the human baseline (17,135).
“Our agent clears all 25 games in 7,518 actions, 0.44 of the human baseline (17,135).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
On ARC-AGI-3, the single-model agent achieves a mean Relative Human Action Efficiency (RHAE) of 100.0.
“achieves a mean Relative Human Action Efficiency (RHAE) of 100.0”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingown data
Our method achieves the maximum episode score of 21 at a learning cost of 9,504 emulator frames.
“Our method achieves the maximum episode score of 21 at a learning cost of 9,504 emulator frames.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The reported learning costs of the model-free and model-based baselines in Table 5 are approximately 2.1 × 10 4 and 42 times this cost, respectively.
“The reported learning costs of the model-free and model-based baselines in Table 5 are approximately 2.1 × 10 4 and 42 times this cost, respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Each reaches +21 without conceding a point.
“Each reaches +21 without conceding a point.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Three rulebook versions from one Pong learning session show how observed ball returns drive two revisions of the bounce rule shared by both paddles.
“Three rulebook versions from one Pong learning session show how observed ball returns drive two revisions of the bounce rule shared by both paddles.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The two world models begin with different hypotheses and converge as the shared interaction history resolves their disagreements.
“The two world models begin with different hypotheses and converge as the shared interaction history resolves their disagreements.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Limited observations can support multiple world models that explain past interactions but predict different outcomes in unseen states.
“Yet limited observations can support multiple world models that explain past interactions but predict different outcomes in unseen states.”
- Also stated in: § 1. Introduction · plain
“A finite interaction history typically leaves a version space of programs that reproduce every observed transition but disagree on unobserved states [24].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Also stated in: § 1. Introduction · plain
- Interpretationreasoning
The repository therefore records the agent's learning trajectory, not just a snapshot of its latest state.
“The repository therefore records the agent's learning trajectory, not just a snapshot of its latest state.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
A shortest admissible rulebook-executable pair maximises the posterior distribution over such pairs.
“A shortest admissible pair maximises µ t .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Committing to one world-model hypothesis may steer exploration away from evidence that would falsify it.
“This preference does not eliminate uncertainty, and committing to one hypothesis may steer exploration away from evidence that would falsify it.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
This history is available to the agent itself.
“Crucially, this history is available to the agent itself.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Other pairs in V t can fit the same history while prescribing different plans.
“Other pairs in V t can fit the same history while prescribing different plans.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Planning under the certainty-equivalent approximation reduces to finding a goal-reaching action sequence within the remaining budget.
“Planning under this certainty-equivalent approximation reduces to finding a goal-reaching action sequence within the remaining budget.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
With the LLM as the proposal and revision operator, repeated runs can select different initial hypotheses, whose plans influence the evidence observed later.
“With the LLM as the proposal and revision operator, repeated runs can select different initial hypotheses, whose plans influence the evidence observed later.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
A population extension maintains multiple world models in parallel, sharing interaction evidence and using their predictions to guide exploration.
“A population extension maintains multiple world models in parallel, sharing interaction evidence and using their predictions to guide exploration.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The single-model planning approximation in Eq. (9) commits to one explanation of the rules and current state.
“The single-model planning approximation in Eq. ( 9) commits to one explanation of the rules and current state.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
A plausible but incorrect model can remain self-confirming if its actions never expose its errors.
“A plausible but incorrect model can remain self-confirming if its actions never expose its errors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The learned rulebook and executable persist across attempts and levels, allowing rules inferred earlier to guide prediction and planning as further mechanics are encountered.
“The learned rulebook and executable persist across attempts and levels, allowing rules inferred earlier to guide prediction and planning as further mechanics are encountered.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
For any θ, θ ′ ∈ Θ t with positive prior probability, the posterior odds equal the prior odds.
“Thus, for any θ, θ ′ ∈ Θ t with positive prior probability, p(θ | H t ) p(θ ′ | H t ) = p(θ) p(θ ′ ) .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
When competing rule hypotheses predict different outcomes for an action, the observed outcome can distinguish them and improve subsequent planning.
“When competing rule hypotheses predict different outcomes for an action, the observed outcome can distinguish them and improve subsequent planning.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Under the selected deterministic hypothesis, a shortest path of at most Bt actions predicts goal completion within budget at minimum action cost.
“Under the selected deterministic hypothesis, a shortest path of at most Bt actions predicts goal completion within budget at minimum action cost.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Selecting different surviving models can expose the agent to different action sequences and hence different histories.
“Selecting different surviving models can expose the agent to different action sequences and hence different histories.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The LLM favours concise rulebooks and implementations, subject to rulebook fidelity and exact replay, as a practical minimum-description-length bias.
“The LLM favours concise rulebooks and implementations, subject to rulebook fidelity and exact replay, as a practical minimum-description-length bias [28].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [28]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Conditional on the recorded initial observations and actions, every replay-consistent executable has unit observation likelihood.
“Conditional on the recorded initial observations and actions, every replay-consistent executable has unit observation likelihood.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The agent updates its own world-model components (ψ t , θ t ), which then guide subsequent action selection and reflection.
“The agent updates its own world-model components (ψ t , θ t ), which then guide subsequent action selection and reflection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
From a state with 0 < V θ (x) < +∞, repeatedly selecting a minimising action yields a finite goal-reaching sequence plan θ (x).
“From a state with 0 < V θ (x) < +∞, repeatedly selecting a minimising action yields a finite goalreaching sequence plan θ (x).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Each action in the plan decreases V θ by one, so the sequence cannot cycle.
“Each action decreases V θ by one, so this sequence cannot cycle.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Rewriting the same hypothesis in language does not by itself remove this self-confirming behaviour.
“Rewriting the same hypothesis in language does not by itself remove this self-confirming behaviour.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
An information-seeking action can increase the probability of reaching a goal even when it makes little immediate progress.
“An information-seeking action can therefore increase the probability of reaching a goal even when it makes little immediate progress.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The frozen LLM approximates the idealised selection objective by proposing simpler environment rules and corresponding source code.
“The frozen LLM approximates the selection in Eq. ( 23) by proposing simpler environment rules and corresponding source.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Drawing on pretrained knowledge, the LLM proposes objects, state variables, and dynamical relationships, which the rulebook records for testing against new observations.
“Drawing on pretrained knowledge, the LLM proposes objects, state variables, and dynamical relationships, which the rulebook records for testing against new observations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The frozen LLM has sufficient pretrained knowledge to propose useful objects, state variables, and dynamical relationships for the target environments.
- Interpretationown data
With task completion held constant, these results suggest that the persistent rulebook improves convergence to an effective executable model.
“With task completion held constant, these results suggest that the persistent rulebook improves convergence to an effective executable model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The rulebook and compiled code support learning from limited interaction by turning the frozen LLM's hypotheses into an explicit world model that can be revised and reused for control.
“The rulebook and compiled code support learning from limited interaction by turning the frozen LLM's hypotheses into an explicit world model that can be revised and reused for control.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Combined with the learned ball and opponent dynamics, this function supports comparison of candidate return trajectories without testing each one in the environment.
“Combined with the learned ball and opponent dynamics, this function supports comparison of candidate return trajectories without testing each one in the environment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The model need not recover the dynamics of every possible state; it must be sufficiently accurate for the decisions required for successful control.
“The model need not recover the dynamics of every possible state; it must be sufficiently accurate for the decisions required for successful control.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Their totals (12,859, 11,697, 9,789 and 14,558) therefore reflect incomplete runs rather than solution costs.
“Their totals (12,859, 11,697, 9,789 and 14,558) therefore reflect incomplete runs rather than solution costs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
This feedback is the model-based route to recursive self-improvement investigated in this work.
“This feedback is the model-based route to recursive self-improvement investigated in this work.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
We introduced MEMENTO 3, which extends reflective learning to explicit world models through Code as Model.
“We introduced MEMENTO 3, which extends reflective learning to explicit world models through Code as Model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The population extension maintains multiple world models in parallel, each updated and verified against a shared interaction history.
“The population extension maintains multiple world models in parallel, each updated and verified against a shared interaction history.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
By carrying verified model updates into subsequent planning and exploration, the agent uses what it has learned to shape the evidence for further revisions.
“By carrying verified model updates into subsequent planning and exploration, the agent uses what it has learned to shape the evidence for further revisions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Our population extension applies this principle by maintaining multiple world models in parallel.
“Our population extension applies this principle by maintaining multiple world models in parallel.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Reflection can revise an environment rule or repair its implementation while retaining the rule.
“Reflection can revise an environment rule or repair its implementation while retaining the rule.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Public-set completion alone therefore cannot isolate the contribution of a worldmodel architecture.
“Public-set completion alone therefore cannot isolate the contribution of a worldmodel architecture.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The agent follows a continual loop of observation, reflection, rule revision, compilation, and verification.
“The agent follows a continual loop of observation, reflection, rule revision, compilation, and verification.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Sampling a member for planning allows different models to guide exploration.
“Sampling a member for planning allows different models to guide exploration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Tycho and Rodionov's component study report saturation or near-saturation of the public set with stronger frontier models.
“Tycho and Rodionov's component study report saturation or near-saturation of the public set with stronger frontier models [20,29].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [20]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [29]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- May combine two claims. 52
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 87
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe other four leave games unfinished: OPINE-World leaves 5, NOOA 6, DreamTeam 19 and Continual Harness 22.
“The other four leave games unfinished: OPINE-World leaves 5, NOOA 6, DreamTeam 19 and Continual Harness 22.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong the systems in Table 2, baseline1 is the only other system to finish every game, using 8,347 actions (0.49 of the human budget).
“Among the systems in Table 2, baseline1 is the only other system to finish every game, using 8,347 actions (0.49 of the human budget).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCODE-AS-MODEL reaches the 100 ceiling on all 25 games, yielding a mean RHAE of 100.0.
“CODE-AS-MODEL reaches the 100 ceiling on all 25 games, yielding a mean RHAE of 100.0.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong the systems compared in Table 1, the closest is baseline1 at 99.0, which also clears every game; NOOA reaches 85.1 having cleared 19 of the 25 games, OPINE-World 78.4 with 20, DreamTeam 38.1 with 6, and Continual Harness 20.5 with 3.
“Among the systems compared in Table 1, the closest is baseline1 at 99.0, which also clears every game; NOOA reaches 85.1 having cleared 19 of the 25 games, OPINE-World 78.4 with 20, DreamTeam 38.1 with 6, and Continual Harness 20.5 with 3.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataA centre hit refutes the initial four-band bounce hypothesis and prompts a centred-deflection formula; further contacts lead to an asymmetric band map.
“Figure 9 illustrates this process: a centre hit refutes the initial four-band bounce hypothesis and prompts a centreddeflection formula; further contacts lead to an asymmetric band map.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataOpenings 1, 2 and 3 require 3,358, 4,014 and 5,039 actions, respectively.
“Openings 1, 2 and 3 require 3,358, 4,014 and 5,039 actions, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe reduction in actions is consistent across all three games, while the largest reductions in agent turns occur on ft09 and cn04.
“The reduction in actions is consistent across all three games, while the largest reductions in agent turns occur on ft09 and cn04.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataEvery run clears every level and reaches RHAE 100, so Table 3 compares the cost of convergence.
“Every run clears every level and reaches RHAE 100, so Table 3 compares the cost of convergence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAcross the three games, it uses 617 rather than 677 actions, a reduction of 9%, and 678 rather than 830 agent turns, a reduction of 18%.
“Across the three games, it uses 617 rather than 677 actions, a reduction of 9%, and 678 rather than 830 agent turns, a reduction of 18%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIt wins 21 : 0 in all three, achieving the maximum episode score of 21.
“It wins 21 : 0 in all three, achieving the maximum episode score of 21.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenFull-frame replay retains residual rendering and paddle-motion errors.
“Full-frame replay retains residual rendering and paddle-motion errors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the reported runs, the rulebook variant uses fewer actions and fewer agent turns in every difficulty band.
“In the reported runs, the rulebook variant uses fewer actions and fewer agent turns in every difficulty band.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenOn ARC-AGI-3, the single-model agent clears every level of all 25 public games and reaches the RHAE ceiling, using 7,518 actions, or 44% of the human action count.
“On ARC-AGI-3, the single-model agent clears every level of all 25 public games and reaches the RHAE ceiling, using 7,518 actions, or 44% of the human action count.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe three green curves show the learned controller under three different openings.
“The three green curves show the learned controller under three different openings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenIn Atari Pong, the learned model supports a feedback controller that wins 21 : 0 in three evaluated episodes with different openings, without LLM calls during execution.
“In Atari Pong, the learned model supports a feedback controller that wins 21 : 0 in three evaluated episodes with different openings, without LLM calls during execution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe same LLM without a world model finishes with a score of -19, and the random-policy episode shown here finishes at -20.
“The same LLM without a world model finishes with a score of -19, and the random-policy episode shown here finishes at -20.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCompared with the verified single-model trajectory, the population reduces the total from 899 to 597 scored actions and matches or improves per-level action efficiency on eight of the nine levels.
“Compared with the verified single-model trajectory, the population reduces the total from 899 to 597 scored actions and matches or improves per-level action efficiency on eight of the nine levels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThree of the eleven rulebook versions from one run on game tr87, each paired with the observation that prompted the revision.
“Three of the eleven rulebook versions from one run on game tr87, each paired with the observation that prompted the revision.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBoth arms clear all nine levels and score RHAE 100 when replayed against the live server.
“Both arms clear all nine levels and score RHAE 100 when replayed against the live server.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenReflection yields a clockwise-rotation rule, which is recorded in the rulebook and compiled into code.
“Reflection yields a clockwise-rotation rule, which is recorded in the rulebook and compiled into code.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenIn this example, an observed badge change contradicts a mirror hypothesis.
“In this example, an observed badge change contradicts a mirror hypothesis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenA ceiling score requires every level to be cleared and the level-weighted mean of e l in Eq. (36) to be at least 1.
“A ceiling score requires every level to be cleared and the level-weighted mean of e ℓ in Eq. ( 36) to be at least 1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenUpdated code is accepted only when the LLM judges it faithful to the rulebook and cell-exact replay reproduces the observed transitions.
“Updated code is accepted only when the LLM judges it faithful to the rulebook and cell-exact replay reproduces the observed transitions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The frozen LLM can reliably assess whether an executable faithfully implements its rulebook.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationEvery baseline is an entry on the ARC-AGI-3 community leaderboard that links to a paper: baseline1, NOOA, OPINE-World, DreamTeam and Continual Harness.
“Every baseline is an entry on the ARC-AGI-3 community leaderboard that links to a paper: baseline1 [30], NOOA [13], OPINE-World [7], DreamTeam [33] and Continual Harness [17].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [30]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [13]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [7]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenThey share H t rather than interacting with separate environment copies.
“They share H t rather than interacting with separate environment copies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenIn Code as Model, the rulebooks make each member's rule hypotheses explicit, so differences in predictions and plans can be examined at the level of environment rules.
“In Code as Model, the rulebooks make each member's rule hypotheses explicit, so differences in predictions and plans can be examined at the level of environment rules.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone givenConditional on the selected model and state, future transitions and observations are deterministic.
“Conditional on this selected model and state, future transitions and observations are deterministic.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThese models may encode different hypotheses about the same environment.
“These models may encode different hypotheses about the same environment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone givenWithout version control, each revision destructively overwrites the rulebook or implementation it replaces.
“Without version control, each revision destructively overwrites the rulebook or implementation it replaces.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenEach proposed simplification is checked for rulebook fidelity and replay consistency.
“Each proposed simplification is checked again for rulebook fidelity and replay consistency.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe N = 1 case recovers the single-model formulation.
“The N = 1 case recovers the formulation above.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenFor action selection, the rule samples uniformly over distinct nonempty plans, giving retained alternatives opportunities to generate new evidence.
“For action selection, the rule below samples uniformly over distinct nonempty plans, giving retained alternatives opportunities to generate new evidence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe population is designed to broaden model-guided exploration and reduce the dependence of an entire run on one early draw.
“The population is therefore designed to broaden model-guided exploration and reduce the dependence of an entire run on one early draw.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe agent can therefore recall hypotheses it has already tested, examine the consequences of a past revision, or restore an executable that a later edit broke.
“The agent can therefore recall hypotheses it has already tested, examine the consequences of a past revision, or restore an executable that a later edit broke.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisereasoningActions affect both the environment and the evidence available for subsequent decisions.
“Actions affect both the environment and the evidence available for subsequent decisions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThis feedback loop underlies the model-based approach to recursive self-improvement.
“This feedback loop underlies our model-based approach to RSI.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. The quote only partly states this claim.
Study design and conductnone givenThe fidelity check compares the executable source with the rulebook.
“Its fidelity check compares the source with the rulebook.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationModel-based reinforcement learning represents uncertainty in environment dynamics through probabilistic models or ensembles.
“Model-based reinforcement learning represents uncertainty in environment dynamics through probabilistic models or ensembles [6,19].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [6]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [19]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenExecution stops at the first prediction mismatch so that the new counterexample can be incorporated before planning continues.
“Execution stops at the first prediction mismatch so that the new counterexample can be incorporated before planning continues.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningFor N > 1, the system maintains N world models in parallel, each comprising a rulebook and its executable realisation.
“For N > 1, the system maintains N world models in parallel, each comprising a rulebook and its executable realisation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenAll members are checked against the same complete set of recorded trajectories.
“All members are checked against the same complete set of recorded trajectories.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenA trajectory that never reaches the goal, including one trapped in a cycle under an improper policy, has infinite cost.
“A trajectory that never reaches the goal, including one trapped in a cycle under an improper policy, has infinite cost.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenEvery real interaction extends the common record.
“Every real interaction extends this common record.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe equal weights describe the empirical distribution over retained members; N = 1 recovers Eq. (9).
“The equal weights describe the empirical distribution over retained members; N = 1 recovers Eq. ( 9).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningMEMENTO 3 uses a natural-language rulebook as persistent semantic memory, compiles it into executable code, and refines both through a continual loop of observation, reflection, rule revision, compilation, and verification.
“The agent maintains a natural-language rulebook as persistent semantic memory, recording revisable hypotheses about environment dynamics while leaving unknown aspects underspecified.”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“Through a continual loop of observation, reflection, rule revision, compilation, and verification, the agent uses prediction errors to refine both the rulebook and its code.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenEvery baseline number, including per-game RHAE, actions and levels cleared, comes from that system's official ARC Prize scorecard, as does the human action baseline, so all columns are counted the same way.
“Every baseline number, including per-game RHAE, actions and levels cleared, comes from that system's official ARC Prize scorecard, as does the human action baseline, so all columns are counted the same way.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenRendered predictions must match all 64 × 64 cells of every subsequent frame within the trajectory before the executable is made available to the planner.
“Rendered predictions must match all 64 × 64 cells of every subsequent frame within the trajectory before the executable is made available to the planner.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningHere, every ψ and every θ the run has held remains addressable, together with when it was written.
“Here, every ψ and every θ the run has held remains addressable, together with when it was written.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIt can inspect earlier iterations, diff two versions of the rulebook or of a module, and recover their contents at any previous commit.
“It can inspect earlier iterations, diff two versions of the rulebook or of a module, and recover their contents at any previous commit.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPosterior sampling and related methods retain a sampled model or value function across an episode to support temporally coherent exploration.
“Posterior sampling and related methods retain a sampled model or value function across an episode to support temporally coherent exploration [23,26,27].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [23]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [26]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [27]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe observed record removes contradicted models while preserving the prior odds among survivors.
“The observed record removes contradicted models while preserving the prior odds among survivors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningLater levels can introduce new mechanics, so the agent must be able to revise its rulebook and executable throughout the game.
“Later levels can introduce new mechanics, so the agent must be able to revise its rulebook and executable throughout the game.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningAcceptance combines an LLM assessment of semantic fidelity with an exact execution check; it is not based on language-model confidence alone.
“Acceptance therefore combines an LLM assessment of semantic fidelity with an exact execution check; it is not based on language-model confidence alone.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The frozen LLM can reliably assess whether an executable faithfully implements its rulebook.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenAn executable is falsified when its prediction contradicts the new observation.
“An executable is falsified when its prediction contradicts the new observation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe selection objective in Eq. (23) favours the shortest combined description among admissible rulebook-executable pairs.
“The objective favours the shortest combined description among admissible rulebook-executable pairs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe observation-based posterior in Eq. (24) makes the remaining ambiguity explicit.
“The observation-based posterior in Eq. ( 24) makes the remaining ambiguity explicit.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAutoManual induces and organises environment rules into reusable manuals.
“AutoManual induces and organises environment rules into reusable manuals [4].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone givenCompilation makes each revised rule available to the controller as an executable function.
“Compilation makes each revised rule available to the controller as an executable function.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCode-as-World extends executable modelling to physical reasoning through a loop of program proposal, execution, rendering, and verification.
“Code-as-World extends executable modelling to physical reasoning through a loop of program proposal, execution, rendering, and verification [41].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [41]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDyna combines real interaction with model-generated experience for planning and learning.
“Dyna combines real interaction with model-generated experience for planning and learning [38].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [38]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTwin similarly gates model-based action on replay of the interaction history.
“Twin similarly gates model-based action on replay of the interaction history [37].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [37]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThis leaves a code world model while keeping the harness, the replay verifier, the plan executor, the backbone and the reasoning effort byte-identical.
“This leaves a code world model while keeping the harness, the replay verifier, the plan executor, the backbone and the reasoning effort byte-identical.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationNeural world models support imagined rollouts, model-predictive control, and tree search, while Dynalang incorporates language as a predictive modality in a multimodal latent model.
“Neural world models support imagined rollouts, model-predictive control, and tree search [6,14,35], while Dynalang incorporates language as a predictive modality in a multimodal latent model [22].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [6]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [14]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [35]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [22]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningThese approaches encode learned dynamics in neural parameters and latent representations.
“These approaches encode learned dynamics in neural parameters and latent representations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLASER is an off-policy actor-critic method with shared experience replay, while IMPALA uses distributed actor-critic learning with V-trace correction.
“LASER [34] is an off-policy actor-critic method with shared experience replay, while IMPALA [9] uses distributed actor-critic learning with V-trace correction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [34]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [9]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationReflexion stores linguistic reflections on task feedback to improve later decisions.
“Reflexion stores linguistic reflections on task feedback to improve later decisions [36].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [36]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenWorld models support decision making by predicting the consequences of actions.
“World models support decision making by predicting the consequences of actions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationRainbow combines several improvements to the deep Q-network (DQN) algorithm.
“Rainbow [15] combines several improvements to the deep Q-network (DQN) algorithm.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [15]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenPrograms provide an alternative representation that exposes transitions as functions a planner can execute and test directly.
“Programs provide an alternative representation that exposes transitions as functions a planner can execute and test directly.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationRodionov's baseline1 maintains, simplifies, and verifies a persistent Python model before planning through it.
“Rodionov's baseline1 maintains, simplifies, and verifies a persistent Python model before planning through it [30].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationWALL-E updates and prunes symbolic rules by comparing predicted and observed trajectories, using those rules to align an LLM world model with its environment.
“WALL-E updates and prunes symbolic rules by comparing predicted and observed trajectories, using those rules to align an LLM world model with its environment [50].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [50]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationOPINE-World maintains natural-language hypotheses, synthesises an object-centric executable, and uses ontology error to direct exploration; candidate programs must reproduce recorded transitions exactly.
“OPINE-World maintains natural-language hypotheses, synthesises an object-centric executable, and uses ontology error to direct exploration; candidate programs must reproduce recorded transitions exactly [7].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [7]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationTogether, these works establish language-guided construction and execution-based refinement as useful mechanisms for learning explicit models.
“Together, these works establish languageguided construction and execution-based refinement as useful mechanisms for learning explicit models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAmong the model-free RL baselines, GDI optimises both policy learning and the distribution of training data.
“Among the model-free RL baselines, GDI [11] optimises both policy learning and the distribution of training data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [11]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLanguage-guided program induction provides a foundation for constructing such models.
“Language-guided program induction provides a foundation for constructing such models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationParsel combines natural-language decompositions with execution-based testing, and Hypothesis Search translates language hypotheses into programs verified on input-output examples.
“Parsel combines natural-language decompositions with execution-based testing [47], and Hypothesis Search translates language hypotheses into programs verified on input-output examples [43].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [47]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [43]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe executable world model supports a planner that searches for a finite action sequence to complete the current level.
“The executable world model supports a planner that searches for a finite action sequence to complete the current level.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationcitationThese results motivate examining how a learned model is maintained and used, alongside its predictive accuracy.
“These results motivate examining how a learned model is maintained and used, alongside its predictive accuracy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCode World Models for General Game Playing constructs transition, legality, and termination functions from rules and trajectories to support Monte Carlo tree search.
“Code World Models for General Game Playing constructs transition, legality, and termination functions from rules and trajectories to support Monte Carlo tree search [21].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFor interactive environments, WorldCoder learns Python dynamics models and repairs them against observed counterexamples; GIF-MCTS searches over candidate models through generation, improvement, and repair guided by descriptions, tests, and trajectories.
“For interactive environments, WorldCoder learns Python dynamics models and repairs them against observed counterexamples [39]; GIF-MCTS searches over candidate models through generation, improvement, and repair guided by descriptions, tests, and trajectories [8].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [39]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [8]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationTheir reported scores, alongside human and random-policy scores, are taken from Fan.
“Their reported scores, alongside human and random-policy scores, are taken from Fan [10].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [10]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIts subsequent component study finds exact verification consistently useful within the tested configurations, but does not find that requiring an executable model uniformly improves action performance.
“Its subsequent component study finds exact verification consistently useful within the tested configurations, but does not find that requiring an executable model uniformly improves action performance [29].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [29]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningEach revision updates the bounce rule for both paddles and changes its predictions at unobserved contact offsets.
“Each revision updates the bounce rule for both paddles and changes its predictions at unobserved contact offsets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTycho examines when an agent should construct, repair, use, or bypass an executable model, showing that better transition replay need not yield better decisions when objectives are misidentified or models are used inappropriately.
“Tycho examines when an agent should construct, repair, use, or bypass an executable model, showing that better transition replay need not yield better decisions when objectives are misidentified or models are used inappropriately [20].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe model-based RL baselines, EfficientZero and EfficientZero V2, learn latent dynamics and use tree search for action selection, with a training budget of 100,000 actions, equivalent to 400,000 emulator frames.
“The model-based RL baselines, EfficientZero [46] and EfficientZero V2 [44], learn latent dynamics and use tree search for action selection, with a training budget of 100,000 actions, equivalent to 400,000 emulator frames.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [46]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [44]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationTextual memory offers another way for frozen LLM agents to learn from interaction.
“Textual memory offers another way for frozen LLM agents to learn from interaction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [36]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [4]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [50]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenValidation in this feedback-control setting combines replay diagnostics with evaluation of the learned controller.
“Validation in this feedback-control setting combines replay diagnostics with evaluation of the learned controller.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe agent records environment hypotheses in a natural-language rulebook, compiles them into code for prediction and planning, and revises both through interaction while keeping the underlying LLM fixed.
“The agent records environment hypotheses in a natural-language rulebook, compiles them into code for prediction and planning, and revises both through interaction while keeping the underlying LLM fixed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The natural-language rulebook can express environment rules with sufficient precision for compilation into executable code.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenEach member pairs a rulebook with an executable, and all members are checked against shared interaction evidence.
“Each member pairs a rulebook with an executable, and all members are checked against shared interaction evidence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationVersion spaces formalise the ambiguity left by finite evidence, and minimum description length provides a simplicity preference among consistent hypotheses.
“Version spaces formalise the ambiguity left by finite evidence [24,25], and minimum description length provides a simplicity preference among consistent hypotheses [28].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [24]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [25]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [28]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationWorkspace Optimization instantiates this view in DreamTeam, whose specialised agents build models, probe hypotheses, and plan.
“Workspace Optimization instantiates this view in DreamTeam, whose specialised agents build models, probe hypotheses, and plan [33].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [33]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationModel-based reinforcement learning represents uncertainty through probabilistic dynamics models or ensembles.
“Model-based reinforcement learning represents uncertainty through probabilistic dynamics models or ensembles [6,19].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [6]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [19]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationNOOA combines a Python objectoriented agent interface with persistent executable modules, prediction-error-driven refinement, and cross-level memory in ARC-AGI-3.
“NOOA combines a Python objectoriented agent interface with persistent executable modules, prediction-error-driven refinement, and cross-level memory in ARC-AGI-3 [13].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe population is a computational approximation to the remaining version space, rather than a calibrated Bayesian posterior; its purpose is to reduce dependence on a single early model construction.
“The population is a computational approximation to the remaining version space, rather than a calibrated Bayesian posterior; its purpose is to reduce dependence on a single early model construction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIt also supports alternatives such as graph-based exploration, which records observed transitions and prioritises untested actions without a generative world model.
“It also supports alternatives such as graph-based exploration, which records observed transitions and prioritises untested actions without a generative world model [32].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationARC-AGI-3 provides a shared setting for studying these approaches under unfamiliar rules and a human-derived action budget.
“ARC-AGI-3 provides a shared setting for studying these approaches under unfamiliar rules and a human-derived action budget [1].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPosterior sampling and related methods retain a sampled hypothesis or value function across an episode to support temporally coherent exploration.
“Posterior sampling and related methods retain a sampled hypothesis or value function across an episode to support temporally coherent exploration [23,26,27].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [23]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [26]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [27]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe LLM assesses code-rulebook fidelity, and replay checks the executable against recorded transitions.
“The LLM assesses code-rulebook fidelity, and replay checks the executable against recorded transitions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The LLM can reliably assess the fidelity between the code and the rulebook.
- Rests on an assumption: Replay checking against recorded transitions is sufficient to verify that the executable correctly implements the rulebook.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataTogether, these results suggest that maintaining a population can make world-model-guided exploration more action-efficient and less sensitive to any single initial hypothesis.
“Together, these results suggest that maintaining a population can make world-model-guided exploration more action-efficient and less sensitive to any single initial hypothesis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The improvement in action efficiency from N=1 to N=2 is due to maintaining a population of world models rather than to the increased computational resources.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningLanguage rules, executable artefacts, reflection, and replay are established components; we organise them around a persistent environment specification supporting both semantic revision and implementation repair.
“Language rules, executable artefacts, reflection, and replay are established components; we organise them around a persistent environment specification supporting both semantic revision and implementation repair.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe accepted model then guides further interaction, producing evidence for the next revision.
“The accepted model then guides further interaction, producing evidence for the next revision.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenBroader approaches to agent adaptation treat external software and workspaces as editable learning state.
“Broader approaches to agent adaptation treat external software and workspaces as editable learning state.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThese approaches range from retaining advice about past decisions to maintaining explicit descriptions of environment behaviour, establishing language as an editable medium for both experience and rule knowledge.
“These approaches range from retaining advice about past decisions to maintaining explicit descriptions of environment behaviour, establishing language as an editable medium for both experience and rule knowledge.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIts model guides edits to the agent, whereas Code as Model predicts transitions within the environment to support planning and control.
“Its model guides edits to the agent, whereas Code as Model predicts transitions within the environment to support planning and control.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationContinual Harness supports reset-free revision of prompts, subagents, skills, and memory.
“Continual Harness supports reset-free revision of prompts, subagents, skills, and memory [17].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationBelief-Calibrated Optimization maintains a language world model of how evaluation responds to changes in an agent's prompt and scaffolding.
“Belief-Calibrated Optimization maintains a language world model of how evaluation responds to changes in an agent's prompt and scaffolding [5].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenResults are from the same runs and scorecards as Table1.
“Results are from the same runs and scorecards as Table1.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenWe hold the backbone, the reasoning effort and the harness fixed at their single-model settings, so only the number of retained pairs changes.
“We hold the backbone, the reasoning effort and the harness fixed at their single-model settings, so only the number of retained pairs changes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenAll baseline numbers come from the official ARC Prize scorecards.
“All baseline numbers come from the official ARC Prize scorecards.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThese models support complementary forms of agent improvement.
“These models support complementary forms of agent improvement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Memento series develops reflective memory from episodic adaptation to stateful reflective learning, which links memory writing and reading to policy evaluation and improvement, and then to reusable executable skills.
“The Memento series develops reflective memory from episodic adaptation [48] to stateful reflective learning, which links memory writing and reading to policy evaluation and improvement [42], and then to reusable executable skills [49].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [48]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [42]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [49]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningCode as Model extends this progression to model-side semantic memory: a persistent rulebook and its executable realisation jointly represent a world-model hypothesis.
“Code as Model extends this progression to model-side semantic memory: a persistent rulebook and its executable realisation jointly represent a world-model hypothesis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The natural-language rulebook can express environment rules with sufficient precision for compilation into executable code.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenVerification checks the executable against the interaction history and the rulebook.
“Verification checks the executable against the interaction history and the rulebook.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe executable is checked by cell-exact replay before it is used for planning.
“The executable is checked by cell-exact replay before it is used for planning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The authors state this as an assumption.
The true environment model is fixed but unknown.
“The true model m ⋆ = (T, ρ, G) ∈ M is fixed but unknown.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The environment is a deterministic, goal-directed POMDP with discrete state, action, and observation spaces.
“We model the agent's interaction with this unknown environment M as a deterministic, goal-directed partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP) [16],”
The paper relies on this without support.
The agent has no access to the environment source, transition rules, underlying environment state, or a natural-language task description.
“The agent observes the action interface and interaction feedback, but has no access to the environment source, transition rules, underlying environment state, or a natural-language task description.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The frozen LLM can reliably assess whether an executable faithfully implements its rulebook.
“Rulebook fidelity, θ ∈ [[ψ]], is a semantic condition and is assessed by the frozen LLM from the rulebook and source.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
ARC-AGI-3 levels can be modeled as deterministic, goal-directed POMDPs of the form M = ⟨S, A, O, T, ρ, G⟩.
“We model an ARC-AGI-3 level as a deterministic, goal-directed POMDP of the form in Section 2, M = ⟨S, A, O, T, ρ, G⟩, s t+1 = T(s t , a t ), o t = ρ(s t ).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The frozen LLM has sufficient pretrained knowledge to propose useful objects, state variables, and dynamical relationships for the target environments.
“Drawing on pretrained knowledge, the LLM proposes objects, state variables, and dynamical relationships, which the rulebook records for testing against new observations.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The frozen LLM can approximate the idealised selection objective in Eq. (23) by proposing simpler environment rules and corresponding source code.
“The frozen LLM approximates the selection in Eq. ( 23) by proposing simpler environment rules and corresponding source.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The LLM can reliably assess the fidelity between the code and the rulebook.
“The LLM assesses code-rulebook fidelity, and replay checks the executable against recorded transitions.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Replay checking against recorded transitions is sufficient to verify that the executable correctly implements the rulebook.
“The LLM assesses code-rulebook fidelity, and replay checks the executable against recorded transitions.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The improvement in action efficiency from N=1 to N=2 is due to maintaining a population of world models rather than to the increased computational resources.
“Compared with the verified single-model trajectory, the population reduces the total from 899 to 597 scored actions and matches or improves per-level action efficiency on eight of the nine levels.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The natural-language rulebook can express environment rules with sufficient precision for compilation into executable code.
“The agent records environment hypotheses in a natural-language rulebook, compiles them into code for prediction and planning, and revises both through interaction while keeping the underlying LLM fixed.”
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Xiuyuan Lu and Benjamin Van Roy. Ensemble sampling. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2017.
- Tom M. Mitchell. Version spaces: A candidate elimination approach to rule learning. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 305-310, 1977.
- Tom M. Mitchell. Generalization as search. Artificial Intelligence, 18(2):203-226, 1982.
- Stéphane Ross, Brahim Chaib-draa, and Joelle Pineau. Bayes-Adaptive POMDPs. In Advances in Neural Infor- mation Processing Systems, volume 20, 2007. URL https://papers.nips.cc/paper_files/paper/2007/hash/ 3b3dbaf68507998acd6a5a5254ab2d76-Abstract.html.
- Richard S. Sutton. Dyna, an integrated architecture for learning, planning, and reacting. ACM SIGART Bulletin, 2(4):160-163, 1991.
- Florent Teichteil-Königsbuch. Stochastic safest and shortest path problems. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 1825-1831, 2012. doi: 10.1609/aaai.v26i1.8367. URL https: //ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AAAI/article/view/8367. · DOI
- Weirui Ye, Shaohuai Liu, Thanard Kurutach, Pieter Abbeel, and Yang Gao. Mastering Atari games with limited data. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 34, 2021. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2111.00210v2.
- Authors
- Zhao, H., Yu, Z., He, Z., Fang, M., Tutunov, R., Bou-Ammar, H., Luo, W., & Wang, J.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2026
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2610.11794
- OpenAlex
- W7221131839
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Type
- posted content
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Psychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Keywords
- recursive self-improvement, world model learning, external memory, semantic memory, model revision, prediction error, program compilation, game-playing agents, continual learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-24.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-24.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review