Testable anthropic predictions for dark energy
Open accessAbstract
In the context of models where the dark energy density $\rD$ is a random variable, anthropic selection effects may explain both the "old" cosmological constant problem and the "time coincidence". We argue that this type of solution to both cosmological constant problems entails a number of definite predictions, which can be checked against upcoming observations. In particular, in models where the dark energy density is a discrete variable, or where it is a continuous variable due to the potential energy of a single scalar field, the anthropic approach predicts that the dark energy equation of state is $p_D=-ρ_D$ with a very high accuracy. It is also predicted that the dark energy density is greater than the currently favored value $Ω_D\approx 0.7$. Another prediction, which may be testable with an improved understanding of galactic properties, is that the conditions for civilizations to emerge arise mostly in galaxies completing their formation at low redshift, $z\approx 1$. Finally, there is a prediction which may not be easy to test observationally: our part of the universe is going to recollapse eventually. However, the simplest models predict that it will take more than a trillion years of accelerated expansion before this happens.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For power-law potentials V(φ) = φ^n with n > 1, there is an integrable divergence at ρ = 0.
“Nevertheless, as has been shown in Garriga & Vilenkin (2002), this is not always the case; in particular, for power-law potentials V(φ) = φ n with n > 1 we find an integrable divergence at ρ = 0.”
From Multiverses and physical cosmology (2004) · cites this paper as Garriga & Vilenkin 2002
Section II, “The Prior Distribution” (Eq. 9; page not available) gives a prior density proportional to 1/|V′|, and the paper states that its singularity where V′=0 is integrable. It does not state the result for all power-law potentials with n>1 or locate the divergence specifically at ρ=0; its quadratic example instead describes an approximately flat prior near zero density. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredAnthropic restrictions demand ρ ≲ 10^-28 g cm^-3.
“It has been shown that anthropic restrictions demand ρ 10 -28 g cm -3 (Kallosh & Linde 2002;Garriga & Vilenkin 2002).”
From Multiverses and physical cosmology (2004) · cites this paper as Garriga & Vilenkin 2002
The discussion of anthropic selection (section ⑴; page unavailable) says that a large positive dark-energy density can prevent galaxies from forming. But the paper does not state a required bound of 10^-28 g cm^-3; its reported constraints on Ω_D depend on assumptions about galaxy mass and the fluctuation spectrum (section ⑵; page unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredDuring inflation the scalar field undergoes randomization by quantum fluctuations, so later its values in different regions are distributed according to 'the length' in field space.
“During inflation the scalar field undergoes randomization by quantum fluctuations, such that later on its values in different regions are distributed according to 'the length' in field space (Garriga & Vilenkin 2002).”
From Multiverses and physical cosmology (2004) · cites this paper as Garriga & Vilenkin 2002
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- ͓5͔ B. Carter, in I.A.U. Symposium 63: Confrontation of Cosmo- logical Theories with Observational Data, edited by M.S. Lon- gair ͑Reidel, Dordecht, 1974͒, p. 291.
- ͓6͔ B. Carter, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London 310, 347 ͑1983͒.
- ͓7͔ J.D. Barrow and F.J. Tipler, The Anthropic Cosmological Prin- ciple ͑Oxford University Press, New York, 1986͒.
- ͓8͔ For an early attempt to apply anthropic arguments to the cos- mological constant, see also P.C.W. Davies and S. Unwin, Proc. R. Soc. London 377, 147 ͑1981͒.
- ͓16͔ S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D 61, 103505 ͑2000͒; ''The cosmo- logical constant problems,'' Talk given at 4th International Symposium on Sources and Detection of Dark Matter in the Universe ͑DM 2000͒, Marina del Rey, California.
- ͓19͔ H.J. Mo and S.D.M. White, astro-ph/0202393. · arXiv
- ͓20͔ M. Mac Low and A. Ferrara, astro-ph/9801237. · arXiv
- ͓22͔ E.M. Leitch and G. Vasisht, astro-ph/9802174. · arXiv
- ͓24͔ P.J.E. Peebles, Principles of Physical Cosmology ͑Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1993͒.
- ͓29͔ W.L. Freedman et al., astro-ph/0012376. · arXiv
- ͓31͔ S. Weinberg, in Critical Dialogues in Cosmology, edited by N. G. Turok ͑World Scientific, Singapore, 1997͒.
- ͓33͔ H. Martel and P.R. Shapiro, astro-ph/9903425. · arXiv
- ͓34͔ W.H. Press and P. Schechter, Astrophys. J. 187, 425 ͑1974͒.
- ͓35͔ A.R. Liddle and D.H. Lyth, Cosmological Inflation and Large- Scale Structure ͑Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, En- gland, 2000͒, p. 400.
- ͓37͔ J.L. Sievers et al., astro-ph/0205387; · arXiv
- W.J. Percival et al., astro-ph/0206256. · arXiv
- ͓38͔ N. Bahcall et al. astro-ph/0205490. · arXiv
- ͓40͔ G. Dvali, G. Gabadadze, and M. Shifman, Phys. Rev. D ͑to be published͒, hep-th/0202174. · arXiv
- ͓41͔ J.R. Bond et al., astro-ph/0210007. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Multiverses and physical cosmology
Ellis, G. F. R., Kirchner, U., & Stoeger, W. R. (2004) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07261.x · Cited by 82 · see citing works
- Authors
- Garriga, J., & Vilenkin, A.
- Affiliations
- Tufts University (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2002
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- astro-ph/0210358
- OpenAlex
- W1970035114
- Cited by
- 81
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 7.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
- Dipòsit Digital de la Universitat de Barcelona (Universitat de Barcelona) (publishedVersion)
- RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (publishedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- Hispana (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- John Templeton Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Keywords
- dark energy, cosmological constant problem, dark energy equation of state, dark energy density, galaxy formation, recollapse, cosmic acceleration, falsifiable predictions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
