New observational frontiers in the multiplicity of young stars
Open accessAbstract
It has now been known for over a decade that low-mass stars located in star-forming regions are very frequently members of binary and multiple systems, even more so than main sequence stars in the solar neighborhood. This high multiplicity rate has been interpreted as the consequence of the fragmentation of small molecular cores into a few seed objects that accrete to their final mass from the remaining material and dynamically evolve into stable multiple systems, possibly producing a few ejecta in the process. Analyzing the statistical properties of young multiple systems in a variety of environments therefore represents a powerful approach to place stringent constraints on star formation theories. In this contribution, we first review a number of recent results related to the multiplicity of T Tauri stars. We then present a series of studies focusing on the multiplicity and properties of optically-undetected, heavily embedded protostars. These objects are much younger than the previously studied pre-main sequence stars, and they therefore offer a closer look at the primordial population of multiple systems. In addition to these observational avenues, we present new results of a series of numerical simulations that attempt to reproduce the fragmentation of small molecular cores into multiple systems, and compare these results to the observations.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mamajek, E. E., Quillen, A. C., Pecaut, M. J., Moolekamp, F., Scott, E. L., Kenworthy, M. A., Cameron, A. C., & Parley, N. R. (2012) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-6256/143/3/72 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
“The fraction that would exhibit an eclipse by a disk would be the fraction that are binaries (∼ 0.5; Duchene et al. 2007; Kraus et al. 2011) times the fraction that have binary periods less than 10 years, times the fraction that have a secondary with an optically thick disk which could produce a significant eclipse, t…”
BackgroundInfluential
- Authors
- Duchene, G., Delgado-Donate, E., Haisch, K., Loinard, L., & Rodriguez, L.
- Affiliations
- Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Grenoble
- Stockholm University (SE)
- Utah Valley University (US)
- Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
- Universidad Autonoma de Mexico
- ORCID
- Loinard, L.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2006
- Pages
- 379
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- astro-ph/0603004
- OpenAlex
- W3024808457
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- prpl
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Keywords
- stellar multiplicity, young stars, T Tauri stars, embedded protostars, star formation theory, pre-main-sequence stars
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review