PreprintCited by 5Astrophysics and Star Formation StudiesStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena

New observational frontiers in the multiplicity of young stars

Open access
Duchene, G., Delgado-Donate, E., Haisch, K., Loinard, L., Rodriguez, L.·2006·arXiv

Abstract

It has now been known for over a decade that low-mass stars located in star-forming regions are very frequently members of binary and multiple systems, even more so than main sequence stars in the solar neighborhood. This high multiplicity rate has been interpreted as the consequence of the fragmentation of small molecular cores into a few seed objects that accrete to their final mass from the remaining material and dynamically evolve into stable multiple systems, possibly producing a few ejecta in the process. Analyzing the statistical properties of young multiple systems in a variety of environments therefore represents a powerful approach to place stringent constraints on star formation theories. In this contribution, we first review a number of recent results related to the multiplicity of T Tauri stars. We then present a series of studies focusing on the multiplicity and properties of optically-undetected, heavily embedded protostars. These objects are much younger than the previously studied pre-main sequence stars, and they therefore offer a closer look at the primordial population of multiple systems. In addition to these observational avenues, we present new results of a series of numerical simulations that attempt to reproduce the fragmentation of small molecular cores into multiple systems, and compare these results to the observations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0603004

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Duchene, G., Delgado-Donate, E., Haisch, K., Loinard, L., & Rodriguez, L.
Affiliations
  • Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Grenoble
  • Stockholm University (SE)
  • Utah Valley University (US)
  • Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
  • Universidad Autonoma de Mexico
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2006
Pages
379
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3024808457
Cited by
5
References
0
Citations by year
2015: 1 · 2012: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • prpl
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Keywords
stellar multiplicity, young stars, T Tauri stars, embedded protostars, star formation theory, pre-main-sequence stars

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review