The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Local Wick Polynomials and Time Ordered Products of Quantum Fields in Curved Spacetime
Open accessAbstract
In order to have well defined rules for the perturbative calculation of quantities of interest in an interacting quantum field theory in curved spacetime, it is necessary to construct Wick polynomials and their time ordered products for the noninteracting theory. A construction of these quantities has recently been given by Brunetti, Fredenhagen, and Kohler, and by Brunetti and Fredenhagen, but they did not impose any ``locality'' or ``covariance'' condition in their constructions. As a consequence, their construction of time ordered products contained ambiguities involving arbitrary functions of spacetime point rather than arbitrary parameters. In this paper, we construct an ``extended Wick polynomial algebra''-large enough to contain the Wick polynomials and their time ordered products. We then define the notion of a {\it local, covariant quantum field}, and seek a definition of {\it local} Wick polynomials and their time ordered products as local, covariant quantum fields. We impose scaling requirements on our local Wick polynomials and their time ordered products as well as certain additional requirements-such as commutation relations with the free field and appropriate continuity properties under variations of the spacetime metric. For a given polynomial order in powers of the field, we prove that these conditions uniquely determine the local Wick polynomials and their time ordered products up to a finite number of parameters. (These parameters correspond to the usual renormalization ambiguities occurring in Minkowski spacetime together with additional parameters corresponding to the coupling of the field to curvature.) We also prove existence of local Wick polynomials. However, the issue of existence of local time ordered products is deferred to a future investigation
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
On quantum ground, 〈 ˆ φ ( x ) P ˆ φ ( x ) 〉 ω = 0, provided the left-hand side is defined via the point-splitting procedure.
“On quantum ground things dramatically change since 〈 ˆ ϕ ( x ) P ˆ ϕ ( x ) 〉 ω = 0, provided the left-hand side is defined via point-splitting procedure (see also [3] where the same remark appears in terms of local Wick polynomials).”
From Comments on the Stress-Energy Tensor Operator in Curved Spacetime (2003) · cites this paper as [3]
Section 4.1 (page unavailable) says that making every local Wick product containing the field-equation factor vanish would be a reasonable additional requirement, but explicitly states that the paper’s construction does not satisfy it. Thus the paper does not make the claimed zero-valued point-splitting remark; it identifies a failure of that property for its construction. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn [3], the ambiguity in quantities that appear as renormalized coupling constants in Minkowski spacetime can be reduced to finitely many degrees of freedom by imposing a suitable requirement of covariance and locality.
“In [3] generalizing the content of [4] and using ideas of [1, 2], it is found that such ambiguity can be reduced to finitely many degrees of freedom by imposing a suitable requirement of covariance and locality (which is an appropriate replacement of the condition of Poincar´ e invariance in Minkowski spacetime).”
From Comments on the Stress-Energy Tensor Operator in Curved Spacetime (2003) · cites this paper as [3]
The Introduction (§1) says locality and covariance reduce arbitrary coupling functions to functions constructed locally and covariantly from the metric. It explicitly says that reducing the ambiguity further to finitely many parameters also requires continuity or analyticity and scaling conditions. The citing sentence omits those additional requirements. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe technique based on a *-algebra of Wick products of field operators in curved spacetime, in the local covariant version proposed by Hollands and Wald, is generalized to define the stress-energy tensor operator in curved globally hyperbolic spacetimes.
“The technique based on a ∗ -algebra of Wick products of field operators in curved spacetime, in the local covariant version proposed by Hollands and Wald, is strightforwardly generalized in order to define the stress-energy tensor operator in curved globally hyperbolic spacetimes.”
From Comments on the Stress-Energy Tensor Operator in Curved Spacetime (2003) · cites this paper as [3]
In [3], two uniqueness theorems are presented about local Wick polynomials and their time-ordered products.
“Imposing further constrains concerning scaling behavior, appropriate continuity properties and commutation relations, two uniqueness theorem are presented about local Wick polynomials and their time-ordered products.”
From Comments on the Stress-Energy Tensor Operator in Curved Spacetime (2003) · cites this paper as [3]
Dω has the property that the operator-valued distributions Wω,n may give rise to operators interpretable as products of field operators evaluated at the same event.
“(b) Those operator-valued distributions may give rise to operators which can be interpreted as products of field operators evaluated at the same event .”
From Comments on the Stress-Energy Tensor Operator in Curved Spacetime (2003) · cites this paper as [3]
The notion of local covariant field is not trivial; for instance, any assignment (M,g) ↦ ω(M,g) where ω(M,g) are quasifree Hadamard states does not define a local covariant quantum field by the map (M,g) ↦ :φ^2:ω(M,g).
“It is worth stressing that the notion of local covariant field is not trivial. For instance, any assignment of the form ( M, g ) ↦→ ω ( M, g ) where ω ( M, g ) are quasifree Hadamard states, does not define a local covariant quantum field by the map ( M, g ) ↦→ : ϕ 2 : ω ( M, g ) [3].”
From Comments on the Stress-Energy Tensor Operator in Curved Spacetime (2003) · cites this paper as [3]
If ω and ω' are two quasifree Hadamard states, Wω(M,g) and Wω'(M,g) are isomorphic under a canonical *-isomorphism αω'ω, as shown in Lemma 2.1 in [3].
“However, if ω, ω ′ are two quasifree Hadamard states, W ω ( M, g ) , W ω ′ ( M, g ) are isomorphic (not unitary in general) under a canonical ∗ -isomorphism α ω ′ ω : W ω ( M, g ) → W ω ′ ( M, g ), as shown in Lemma 2.1 in [3].”
From Comments on the Stress-Energy Tensor Operator in Curved Spacetime (2003) · cites this paper as [3]
The local Wick products found by Hollands and Wald make use of the Hadamard parametrix only and are independent from any preferred Hadamard vacuum state.
“The found local Wick products make use of the Hadamard parametrix only and turn out to be independent from any preferred Hadamard vacuum state.”
From Comments on the Stress-Energy Tensor Operator in Curved Spacetime (2003) · cites this paper as [3]
As remarked in [3], a straightforward definition of the stress-energy tensor operator from local Wick products of differentiated fields would produce a non-conserved stress-energy tensor.
“However, as remarked in [3] such a definition would produce a non conserved stress-energy tensor.”
From Comments on the Stress-Energy Tensor Operator in Curved Spacetime (2003) · cites this paper as [3]
Dω has the property that every map h ↦ Wω,n(h), h ∈ D_n(M), defines a symmetric operator-valued distribution.
“D ω enjoys two relevant properties. (a) Every map h ↦→ ˆ W ω,n ( h ), h ∈ D n ( M ), defines a symmetric operator-valued distribution .”
From Comments on the Stress-Energy Tensor Operator in Curved Spacetime (2003) · cites this paper as [3]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- [3][3] T. S. Bunch: 'BPHZ renormalization of λ Φ 4 field theory in curved space-times,' Ann. of Phys. 131, 118 (1981) -
- [6][6] M. D¨ utsch and K. Fredenhagen: 'Algebraic quantum field theory, perturbation theory, and the loop expansion,' [hep-th/0001129]; 'Perturbative algebraic field theory, and deformation quantization,' [hep-th/0101079] 9 By this we mean a set of the form Γ = { ( x, k ) ∈ U × R n | k ∈ Γ x } , where U is a closed set and where Γ x is a closed cone in R n for all x ∈ U . - · arXiv
- [10][10] P. R. Garabedian: 'Partial Differential Equations,' Wiley, New York 1964 -
- [12][12] S. Hollands: 'Aspects of Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetimes,' PhD thesis, University of York, September 2000 -
- [13][13] V. Iyer and R. M. Wald: 'A Comparison of Noether charge and Euclidean methods for computing the entropy of stationary black holes,' Phys. Rev. D 52 4430 (1995) [gr-qc/9503052] - · arXiv
- [16][16] B. S. Kay: 'Application of linear hyperbolic PDE to linear quantum fields in curved spacetimes: especially black holes, time machines and a new semilocal vacuum concept', In: Proceedings 'Journ´ ees ´ Equations aux deriv´ ees partielles ', GDR 1151 (CNRS), Nantes 2000, available at: http://www.math.sciences.univ-nantes.fr/edpa/2000/html and [grqc/0103056] -
- [17][17] V. Moretti: 'Proof of the symmetry of the off-diagonal Hadamard/Seeley-deWitt's coefficients in C ∞ Lorentzian manifolds by a local Wick rotation,' Commun. Math. Phys. 212 165-189 (2000) [gr-qc/9908068] - · arXiv
- [19][19] W. Tichy and E. Flanagan: 'How unique is the expected stress energy tensor of a massive scalar field?,' Phys. Rev. D58 , 124007 (1998) [gr-qc/9807015] - · arXiv
- [20][20] R. M. Wald: 'Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime and Black Hole Thermodynamics,' The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1994 -
- [21][21] R. M. Wald: 'General Relativity,' The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1984 -
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Comments on the Stress-Energy Tensor Operator in Curved Spacetime
Moretti, V. (2003) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/s00220-002-0702-7 · Cited by 96
Metadata
- Authors
- Hollands, S., & Wald, R. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Chicago (US)
- ORCID
- Hollands, Stefan
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 223
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 289-326
- ISSN
- 0010-3616 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- gr-qc/0103074
- OpenAlex
- W1968813459
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 6.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Communications in Mathematical Physics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Advanced Operator Algebra Research
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Keywords
- time-ordered products, quantum field theory in curved spacetime, renormalization ambiguity, perturbative renormalization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review