M-theory, Cosmological Constant and Anthropic Principle
Open accessAbstract
We discuss the theory of dark energy based on maximally extended supergravity and suggest a possible anthropic explanation of the present value of the cosmological constant and of the observed ratio between dark energy and energy of matter.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Anthropic restrictions demand ρ ≲ 10^-28 g cm^-3.
“It has been shown that anthropic restrictions demand ρ 10 -28 g cm -3 (Kallosh & Linde 2002;Garriga & Vilenkin 2002).”
From Multiverses and physical cosmology (2004) · cites this paper as Kallosh & Linde 2002
The Introduction (p. 2) discusses anthropic limits on the cosmological constant, including an argument that life of our type is impossible when Λ is much greater than 10^-29 g/cm³. It does not establish a firm upper bound of 10^-28 g/cm³: its galaxy-formation examples give thresholds of about 10^-27 and 10^-25 g/cm³, depending on the regions considered. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- [23]R. Bousso and J. Polchinski, 'Quantization of fourform fluxes and dynamical neutralization of the cosmological constant,' JHEP 0006 , 006 (2000) [arXiv:hep-th/0004134]; J. L. Feng, J. March-Russell, S. Sethi and F. Wilczek, 'Saltatory relaxation of the cosmological constant,' Nucl. Phys. B 602 , 307 (2001) [arXiv:hep-th/0005276]. · arXiv
- [24]J. A. Frieman, C. T. Hill, A. Stebbins and I. Waga, 'Cosmology with ultralight pseudo NambuGoldstone bosons,' Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 , 2077 (1995) [arXiv:astro-ph/9505060]; I. Waga and J. A. Frieman, 'New Constraints from High Redshift Supernovae and Lensing Statistics upon Scalar Field Cosmologies,' Phys. Rev. D 62 , 043521 (2000) [arXiv:astroph/0001354]. · arXiv
- [25]K. Choi, 'String or M theory axion as a quintessence,' Phys. Rev. D 62 , 043509 (2000) [arXiv:hepph/9902292].
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Multiverses and physical cosmology
Ellis, G. F. R., Kirchner, U., & Stoeger, W. R. (2004) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07261.x · Cited by 82 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kallosh, R., & Linde, A.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- ORCID
- Linde, Andrei
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2002
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- hep-th/0208157
- OpenAlex
- W2070956797
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 8.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Keywords
- M-theory, cosmological constant, anthropic principle, dark energy, vacuum energy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
