PreprintCited by 4,321Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesQuantum many-body systems

Holographic Derivation of Entanglement Entropy from AdS/CFT

Open access
Ryu, Shinsei, Takayanagi, Tadashi·2006·arXiv

Abstract

A holographic derivation of the entanglement entropy in quantum (conformal) field theories is proposed from AdS/CFT correspondence. We argue that the entanglement entropy in d+1 dimensional conformal field theories can be obtained from the area of d dimensional minimal surfaces in AdS_{d+2}, analogous to the Bekenstein-Hawking formula for black hole entropy. We show that our proposal perfectly reproduces the correct entanglement entropy in 2D CFT when applied to AdS_3. We also compare the entropy computed in AdS_5 \times S^5 with that of the free N=4 super Yang-Mills.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.hep-th/0603001

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a gravitational formula for the von Neumann or fine-grained entropy that involves a generalized entropy, with an area plus the entropy of fields outside, differing from the coarse-grained formula only in the choice of dividing surface.

    “Surprisingly there is also a gravitational formula for the von Neumann or fine-grained entropy [5,6,9,10]. It is also given by a formula that involves a generalized entropy, with an area plus the entropy of fields outside. The only difference is in the choice of the dividing surface.”

    From The entropy of Hawking radiation (2021) · cites this paper as [5]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The fine-grained entropy is the minimal value of the generalized entropy over surfaces.

    “Roughly the idea is that we choose a surface such that the generalized entropy is minimized. This minimal value is the fine-grained entropy,”

    From The entropy of Hawking radiation (2021) · cites this paper as [5]

    The Introduction (p. 1) proposes calculating a CFT subsystem’s entanglement entropy using a minimal surface, and Section II (p. 2) says the minimal surface gives the severest entropy bound for fixed boundary conditions. But the paper does not formulate this as minimizing generalized entropy; that part of the attributed claim is unsupported by our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [23]S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov and A. W. Peet, 'Entropy and Temperature of Black 3-Branes,' Phys. Rev. D 54 , 3915 (1996) [arXiv:hep-th/9602135]. · arXiv
  2. [24]E. Witten, 'Anti-de Sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge theories,' Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 , 505 (1998) [arXiv:hep-th/9803131]. · arXiv
  3. [25]S. J. Rey, S. Theisen and J. T. Yee, 'Wilson-Polyakov loop at finite temperature in large N gauge theory and anti-de Sitter supergravity,' Nucl. Phys. B 527 , 171 (1998) [arXiv:hep-th/9803135]; A. Brandhuber, N. Itzhaki, J. Sonnenschein and S. Yankielowicz, 'Wilson loops in the large N limit at finite temperature,' Phys. Lett. B 434 , 36 (1998) [arXiv:hep-th/9803137]; 'Wilson loops, confinement, and phase transitions in large N gauge theories from supergravity,' JHEP 9806 , 001 (1998) [arXiv:hep-th/9803263]. · arXiv
  4. [26]R. Brustein, M. B. Einhorn and A. Yarom, 'Entanglement interpretation of black hole entropy in string theory,' JHEP 0601 , 098 (2006) [arXiv:hep-th/0508217]. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ryu, S., & Takayanagi, T.
Affiliations
University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2006
Volume
96
Issue
18
Pages
181602-181602
ISSN
0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2110283120
Cited by
4,321
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 217 · 2025: 333 · 2024: 294 · 2023: 298 · 2022: 349 · 2021: 396 · 2020: 382 · 2019: 344 · 2018: 293 · 2017: 251 · 2016: 312 · 2015: 224 · 2014: 224 · 2013: 126 · 2012: 85
FWCI
21.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
Keywords
entanglement entropy, holography, AdS/CFT correspondence, minimal surfaces, Bekenstein-Hawking formula, black hole entropy, two-dimensional conformal field theory, AdS3, AdS5 x S5, N=4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills, quantum field theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review