Diffeomorphism-invariant generalized measures on the space of connections modulo gauge transformations
Open accessAbstract
The notion of a measure on the space of connections modulo gauge transformations that is invariant under diffeomorphisms of the base manifold is important in a variety of contexts in mathematical physics and topology. At the formal level, an example of such a measure is given by the Chern-Simons path integral. Certain measures of this sort also play the role of states in quantum gravity in Ashtekar's formalism. These measures define link invariants, or more generally multiloop invariants; as noted by Witten, the Chern-Simons path integral gives rise to the Jones polynomial, while in quantum gravity this observation is the basis of the loop representation due to Rovelli and Smolin. Here we review recent work on making these ideas mathematically rigorous, and give a rigorous construction of diffeomorphism-invariant measures on the space of connections modulo gauge transformations generalizing the recent work of Ashtekar and Lewandowski. This construction proceeds by doing lattice gauge theory on graphs analytically embedded in the base manifold.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The completion A/G can be obtained as the projective limit of a projective family of compact Hausdorff analytic manifolds labelled by graphs.
“its spectrum, A / G , can also be obtained as the projective limit of a projective family of compact, Hausdorff, analytic manifolds [4, 5, 6, 7, 8].”
From Differential geometry on the space of connections via graphs and projective limits (1995) · cites this paper as [6]
A/G admits large families of measures invariant under the induced action of Diff(M).
“In particular, it is known that A / G admits large families of measures which are invariant under the induced action of Diff( M ) [4, 5, 6, 12, 8]”
From Differential geometry on the space of connections via graphs and projective limits (1995) · cites this paper as [6]
Many of the Diff(M)-invariant measures on A/G are faithful, indicating that all of A/G would be relevant to quantum gravity.
“Many of these are faithful indicating that all of A / G would be relevant to quantum gravity.”
From Differential geometry on the space of connections via graphs and projective limits (1995) · cites this paper as [6]
The shift from hoops to graphs was suggested and explored by Baez.
“The shift from hoops to graphs was suggested and explored by Baez [5, 6].”
From Differential geometry on the space of connections via graphs and projective limits (1995) · cites this paper as [6]
Baez discovered powerful theorems that simplify obtaining measures and, using them, obtained a large class of diffeomorphism invariant measures on A/G.
“His main result was two-folds: he discovered powerful theorems that simplify the task of obtaining measures and, using them, obtained a large class of diffeomorphism invariant measures on A / G .”
From Differential geometry on the space of connections via graphs and projective limits (1995) · cites this paper as [6]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Representations of the holonomy algebras of gravity and nonAbelian gauge theories
Ashtekar, A., & Isham, C. J. (1992) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/9/6/004 · Cited by 310 · see citing works
Knot invariants as nondegenerate quantum geometries
Brügmann, B., Gambini, R., & Pullin, J. (1992) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.68.431 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Link Invariants, Holonomy Algebras and Functional Integration
Baez, J. C. (1993) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.hep-th/9301063 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Quantum theory of geometry: I. Area operators
Ashtekar, A., & Lewandowski, J. (1997) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/14/1a/006 · Cited by 852 · see citing works
Projective techniques and functional integration for gauge theories
Ashtekar, A., & Lewandowski, J. (1995) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.531037 · Cited by 388 · see citing works
Baez, J. C. (1998) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/15/7/004 · Cited by 381 · see citing works
Self-citationDifferential geometry on the space of connections via graphs and projective limits
Ashtekar, A., & Lewandowski, J. (1995) · Journal of Geometry and Physics · doi:10.1016/0393-0440(95)00028-g · Cited by 303 · see citing works
Baez, J. C. (1996) · Advances in Mathematics · doi:10.1006/aima.1996.0012 · Cited by 266 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantum spin dynamics (QSD): II. The kernel of the Wheeler - DeWitt constraint operator
Thiemann, T. (1998) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/15/4/012 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
On the support of the Ashtekar-Lewandowski measure
Marolf, D., & Mourão, J. M. (1995) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf02099150 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Generalized measures in gauge theory
Baez, J. C. (1994) · Letters in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf00761713 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantum theory of geometry: III. Non-commutativity of Riemannian structures
Ashtekar, A., Corichi, A., & Zapata, J. A. (1998) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/15/10/006 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Lewandowski, J. (1997) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/14/1/010 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Reality conditions inducing transforms for quantum gauge field theory and quantum gravity
Thiemann, T. (1996) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/13/6/012 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
LOOP CONSTRAINTS: A HABITAT AND THEIR ALGEBRA
LEWANDOWSKI, J., & MAROLF, D. (1998) · International Journal of Modern Physics D · doi:10.1142/s0218271898000231 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
- Authors
- Baez, J. C.
- Corresponding author
- Baez, John C.
- ORCID
- Baez, John C.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 1993
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- hep-th/9305045
- OpenAlex
- W1551529555
- Cited by
- 78
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Geometric and Algebraic Topology
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Advanced Operator Algebra Research
- Keywords
- link invariants, Jones polynomial, quantum gravity, lattice gauge theory, loop representation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
