CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 6,821Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsAlgebraic structures and combinatorial modelsParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies

The Large N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity

Open access
Maldacena, Juan M.·1997·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.hep-th/9711200arXiv hep-th/9711200
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

We show that the large $N$ limit of certain conformal field theories in various dimensions include in their Hilbert space a sector describing supergravity on the product of Anti-deSitter spacetimes, spheres and other compact manifolds. This is shown by taking some branes in the full M/string theory and then taking a low energy limit where the field theory on the brane decouples from the bulk. We observe that, in this limit, we can still trust the near horizon geometry for large $N$. The enhanced supersymmetries of the near horizon geometry correspond to the extra supersymmetry generators present in the superconformal group (as opposed to just the super-Poincare group). The 't Hooft limit of 4-d ${\cal N} =4$ super-Yang-Mills at the conformal point is shown to contain strings: they are IIB strings. We conjecture that compactifications of M/string theory on various Anti-deSitter spacetimes are dual to various conformal field theories. This leads to a new proposal for a definition of M-theory which could be extended to include five non-compact dimensions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.hep-th/9711200

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • String theory provides a great deal of very non-trivial evidence for the central dogma.

    “Though we said that the 'central dogma' is an unproven assumption, there is a great deal of very non-trivial evidence from string theory.”

    From The entropy of Hawking radiation (2021) · cites this paper as [54]

  • In AdS/CFT, the black hole and its whole exterior can be represented in terms of degrees of freedom living at the boundary.

    “In this case, the black hole and its whole exterior can be represented in terms of degrees of freedom living at the boundary.”

    From The entropy of Hawking radiation (2021) · cites this paper as [54]

  • The AdS/CFT correspondence is a conjectured relation between the physics of AdS and a dual theory living at its boundary.

    “Another piece of evidence comes from the AdS/CFT correspondence [54-56], which is a conjectured relation between the physics of AdS and a dual theory living at its boundary.”

    From The entropy of Hawking radiation (2021) · cites this paper as [54]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 65

  1. J. Maldacena and A. Strominger, hep-th/9710014. · arXiv
  2. N. Seiberg, Phys. Lett. B408 (1997) 98, hep-th/9705221 · arXiv
  3. R. Kallosh and A. Peet, Phys. Rev. D46 (1992) 5223, hep-th/9209116; · arXiv
  4. S. Ferrara, G. Gibbons, R. Kallosh, Nucl. Phys. B500 (1997) 75, hep-th/9702103. · arXiv
  5. G. Gibbons and P. Townsend, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 5223, hep-th/9307049. · arXiv
  6. Look for "gauged" supergravities in Supergravities in Diverse Dimensions , Vol. 1 and 2, A. Salam and E. Sezgin, (1989), North-Holland.
  7. M. Duff, G. Gibbons and P. Townsend, hep-th/9405124. · arXiv
  8. P. Claus, R. Kallosh and A. van Proeyen, hep-th/9711161. · arXiv
  9. G. Gibbons, G. Horowitz and P. Townsend, hep-th/9410073. · arXiv
  10. L. Susskind, hep-th/9611164; · arXiv
  11. O. Ganor, S. Ramgoolam and W. Taylor IV, Nucl. Phys. B492 (1997) 191, hep-th/9611202. · arXiv
  12. M. Douglas, J. Polchinski and A. Strominger, hep-th/9703031. · arXiv
  13. M. Dine and N. Seiberg, Phys. Lett. B409 (1997) 239, hep-th/9705057. · arXiv
  14. K. Becker, M. Becker, J. Polchinski and A. Tseytlin, Phys. Rev. D56 (1997) 3174, hep-th/9706072. · arXiv
  15. A. Polyakov, hep-th/9711002. · arXiv
  16. T. Banks, W. Fishler, I. Klebanov and L. Susskind, hep-th/9709091. · arXiv
  17. S. Gubser, I. Klebanov and A. Peet, Phys. Rev. D54 (1996) 3915, hep-th/9602135; · arXiv
  18. I. Klebanov, Nucl. Phys. B496 (1997) 231, hep-th/9702076. · arXiv
  19. S. Gubser, I. Klebanov and A. Tseytlin, Nucl. Phys. B499 (1997) 217, hep-th/9703040. · arXiv
  20. S. Gubser and I. Klebanov, hep-th/9708005. · arXiv
  21. C. Vafa, Nucl. Phys. B469 (1996) 403, hep-th/9602022. · arXiv
  22. I. Klebanov and A. Tseytlin, Nucl. Phys. B475 (1996) 164, hep-th/9604089. · arXiv
  23. A. Srominger, Phys. Lett. B383 (1996) 44, hep-th/9512059. · arXiv
  24. E. Witten, hep-th/9507121, N. Seiberg and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B 471 (1996) 121, hep-th/9603003 · arXiv
  25. J. Maldacena, Proceedings of Strings'97, hep-th/9709099. · arXiv
  26. N. Seiberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 (1997) 3577, hep-th/9710009. · arXiv
  27. A. Sen, hep-th/9709220. · arXiv
  28. N. Seiberg, hep-th/9705117. · arXiv
  29. S. Sethi and L. Susskind, Phys. Lett. B400 (1997) 265, hep-th/9702101. · arXiv
  30. T. Banks and N. Seiberg, Nucl. Phys. B497 (1997) 41, hep-th/9702187. · arXiv
  31. T. Banks, W. Fishler, N. Seiberg and L. Susskind, Phys. Lett. B408 (1997) 111, hep-th/9705190. · arXiv
  32. I. Bars, Phys. Rev. D55 (1997) 2373, hep-th/9607112. · arXiv
  33. A. Strominger and C. Vafa, Phys. Lett. B379 (1996) 99, hep-th/9601029. · arXiv
  34. L. Andrianopoli, R. D'Auria and S. Ferrara, Int. J. Mod .Phys A12 (1997) 3759, hep-th/9612105. · arXiv
  35. S. Ferrara and R. Kallosh, Phys. Rev. D54 (1996) 1514, hep-th/9602136; · arXiv
  36. J.C. Breckenridge, R.C. Myers, A.W. Peet and C. Vafa, Phys. Lett. B391 (1997) 93, hep-th/9602065. · arXiv
  37. J. Maldacena, Phys. Rev. D55 (1997) 7645, hep-th/9611125. · arXiv
  38. D. Diaconescu and N. Seiberg, JHEP07(1997)001, hep-th/9707158. · arXiv
  39. O. Aharony, M. Berkooz, S. Kachru, N. Seiberg and E. Silverstein, hep-th/9707079. · arXiv
  40. E. Witten, hep-th/9707093. · arXiv
  41. Bañados, Teitelboim and Zanelli, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 (1992) 1849, hep-th/9204099. · arXiv
  42. S. Hyun, hep-th/9704005. · arXiv
  43. H. Boonstra, B. Peeters and K. Skenderis, hep-th/9706192 · arXiv
  44. K. Sfetsos and K. Skenderis, hep-th/9711138. · arXiv
  45. S. Hellerman and J. Polchinski, hep-th/9711037. · arXiv
  46. G. Horowitz and A. Strominger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 2368, hep-th/9602051. · arXiv
  47. A. Dhar, G. Mandal and S. Wadia Phys. Lett. B388 (1996) 51, hep-th/9605234; · arXiv
  48. S. Das and S. Mathur, Nucl. Phys. B478 (1996) 561, hep-th/9606185; Nucl.Phys. B482 (1996) 153, hep-th/9607149; · arXiv
  49. J. Maldacena and A. Strominger, Phys. Rev. D55 (1997) 861, hep-th/9609026; · arXiv
  50. S. Gubser, I. Klebanov, Nucl. Phys. B482 (1996) 173, hep-th/9608108; · arXiv
  51. C. Callan, Jr., S. Gubser, I. Klebanov and A. Tseytlin, Nucl. Phys. B489 (1997) 65, hep-th/9610172; · arXiv
  52. I. Klebanov and M. Krasnitz Phys. Rev. D55 (1997) 3250, hep-th/9612051; · arXiv
  53. Klebanov, A. Rajaraman and A. Tseytlin Nucl. Phys. B503 (1997) 157, hep-th/9704112; · arXiv
  54. S. Gubser, hep-th/9706100; · arXiv
  55. H. Lee, Y. Myung and J. Kim, hep-th/9708099; K. Hosomichi, hep-th/9711072. · arXiv
  56. D. Birmingham, I. Sachs and S. Sen, hep-th/9707188. · arXiv
  57. M. Cvetic and F. Larsen, Phys. Rev. D56 (1997) 4994, hep-th/9705192; hep- th/9706071. · arXiv
  58. J. Maldacena, A. Strominger and E. Witten, hep-th/9711053. · arXiv
  59. A. Chamseddine, S. Ferrara, G. Gibbons and R Kallosh, Phys. Rev. D55 (1997) 3647, hep-th/9610155. · arXiv
  60. J. Maldacena and A. Strominger, Phys. Rev. D56 (1997) 4975, hep-th/9702015. · arXiv
  61. J. Maldacena and L. Susskind, Nucl .Phys. B475 (1996) 679, hep-th/9604042. · arXiv
  62. T. Banks, W. Fischler, S. Shenker and L. Susskind, hep-th/9610043. · arXiv
  63. S. Carlip, Phys. Rev. D51 (1995) 632, gr-qc/9409052. · arXiv
  64. R. Kallosh, J. Kumar and A. Rajaraman, hep-th/9712073. · arXiv
  65. S. Hawking and J. Ellis, The large scale structure of spacetime, Cambrige Univ. Press (1973), and references therein.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maldacena, J. M.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Maldacena, Juan M.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
1997
Volume
38
Issue
4
Pages
1113-1133
ISSN
0020-7748 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.hep-th/9711200
arXiv
hep-th/9711200
OpenAlex
W2166248051
Cited by
6,821
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 136 · 2025: 214 · 2024: 240 · 2023: 316 · 2022: 406 · 2021: 530 · 2020: 504 · 2019: 539 · 2018: 482 · 2017: 473 · 2016: 525 · 2015: 480 · 2014: 174 · 2013: 106 · 2012: 190
FWCI
23.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/assumed-1991-2003/
Locations
  • International Journal of Theoretical Physics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
U.S. Department of Energy (DE‐FG02‐)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Keywords
large N limit, superconformal field theory, supergravity, anti-de Sitter space, M-theory, string theory, branes, near-horizon geometry, superconformal group, 't Hooft limit, N=4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills, AdS/CFT correspondence, compactification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review