CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 604Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies

The Holographic Bound in Anti-de Sitter Space

Open access
Susskind, L., Witten, Edward·1998·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.hep-th/9805114arXiv hep-th/9805114
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The correspondence between string theory in Anti-de Sitter space and super Yang Mills theory is an example of the Holographic principle according to which a quantum theory with gravity must be describable by a boundary theory. However, arguments given so far are incomplete because, while the bulk theory has been related to a boundary theory, the holographic bound saying that the boundary theory has only one bit of information per Planck area has not been justified. We show here that this bound is the physical interpretation of one of the unusual aspects of the correspondence between Anti-de Sitter space and the boundary conformal field theory, which is that infrared effects in the bulk theory are reflected as ultraviolet effects in the boundary theory.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.hep-th/9805114

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The extrapolate dictionary relates correlation functions of the boundary theory in the state ρ_B to scattering S-matrices of semiclassical bulk fields in the geometry B.

    “An extrapolate dictionary stated in [99,100] relates correlation functions of the boundary theory in the state ρ B to scattering S-matrices of the semiclassical bulk fields in the geometry B as follows:foot_3”

    From Holographic spacetime, black holes and quantum error correcting codes: a review (2022) · cites this paper as [99]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Susskind, L., & Witten, E.
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
1998
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.hep-th/9805114
arXiv
hep-th/9805114
OpenAlex
W2124105624
Cited by
604
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 20
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/assumed-1991-2003/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Keywords
holographic bound, anti-de Sitter space, AdS/CFT correspondence, holographic principle, infrared effects, conformal field theory, string theory, quantum gravity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review