Cited by 1,112Quantum many-body systemsBlack Holes and Theoretical PhysicsQuantum chaos and dynamical systems

Fast scramblers

Open access
Sekino, Yasuhiro, Susskind, L·2008·Journal of High Energy Physics

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1126-6708/2008/10/065

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The authors observe a characteristic Page curve associated with a maximally entangled, highly scrambled, but globally pure state.

    “We observe a characteristic Page curve51 associated with a maximally entangled, highly scrambled, but globally pure state.”

    From Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays (2024) · cites this paper as [51]

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [5]5. D. Kabat and P. Pouliot, Comment on zero-brane quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 1004 [hep-th/9603127]; · arXiv
  2. [6]6. U.H. Danielsson, G. Ferretti and B. Sundborg, D-particle dynamics and bound states, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 11 (1996) 5463 [hep-th/9603081]; · arXiv
  3. [8]8. T. Banks, W. Fischler, S.H. Shenker and L. Susskind, M theory as a matrix model: a conjecture, Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 5112 [hep-th/9610043]. · arXiv
  4. [15]15. L. Susskind and J.S. Lindesay, Black holes, information, and the string theory revolution: the holographic universe, World Scientific, Singapore (2005).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sekino, Y., & Susskind, L.
Affiliations
  • Okayama Institute for Quantum Physics (JP)
  • Stanford University (US)
Venue
Journal of High Energy Physics
Published
2008-10-15
Volume
2008
Issue
10
Pages
065-065
ISSN
1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3037318174
Cited by
1,112
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 67 · 2025: 118 · 2024: 105 · 2023: 114 · 2022: 117 · 2021: 93 · 2020: 100 · 2019: 94 · 2018: 78 · 2017: 58 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 10
FWCI
4.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of High Energy Physics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Quantum chaos and dynamical systems
Keywords
quantum scrambling, thermalization, scrambling time, matrix quantum mechanics, black holes, quantum chaos, logarithmic scaling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review