PreprintCited by 132Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories

Cosmology vs. Holography

Open access
Kaloper, Nemanja, Linde, Andrei·1999·arXiv

Abstract

The most radical version of the holographic principle asserts that all information about physical processes in the world can be stored on its surface. This formulation is at odds with inflationary cosmology, which implies that physical processes in our part of the universe do not depend on the boundary conditions. Also, there are some indications that the radical version of the holographic theory in the context of cosmology may have problems with unitarity and causality. Another formulation of the holographic principle, due to Fischler and Susskind, implies that the entropy of matter inside the post-inflationary particle horizon must be smaller than the area of the horizon. Their conjecture was very successful for a wide class of open and flat universes, but it did not apply to closed universes. Bak and Rey proposed a different holographic bound on entropy which was valid for closed universes of a certain type. However, as we will show, neither proposal applies to open, flat and closed universes with matter and a small negative cosmological constant. We will argue, in agreement with Easther, Lowe, and Veneziano, that whenever the holographic constraint on the entropy inside the horizon is valid, it follows from the Bekenstein-Hawking bound on the black hole entropy. These constraints do not allow one to rule out closed universes and other universes which may experience gravitational collapse, and do not impose any constraints on inflationary cosmology.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.hep-th/9904120

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other prescriptions can be used for sufficiently small surfaces in a wide class of cosmological solutions.

    “while other prescriptions [12,13,14,15,16] can be used for sufficiently small surfaces in a wide class of cosmological solutions.”

    From A covariant entropy conjecture (1999) · cites this paper as [15]

  • The bound of ref. [14] cannot be applied to a flat universe with negative cosmological constant.

    “As an example, we apply a corollary derived in sec.5.1 to understand why the bound of ref. [14] cannot be applied to a flat universe with negative cosmological constant [15].”

    From A covariant entropy conjecture (1999) · cites this paper as [15]

  • The validity of the bound was checked for flat universes with 0 ≤ γ ≤ 1 in ref. [9] and for -1 < γ < 0 in ref. [15].

    “The validity of the bound was checked for flat universes with 0 ≤ γ ≤ 1 in ref. [9] and for -1 < γ < 0 in ref. [15].”

    From A covariant entropy conjecture (1999) · cites this paper as [15]

  • If the evolution is adiabatic, the ratio of entropy to area behaves as S/A ≤ σ t^{(γ-1)/(γ+1)} for any past-directed light-sheet of areas specified at a later time t.

    “the ratio of entropy to area behaves as [15] S A ≤ σt γ-1 γ+1 (4.8) for any past-directed light-sheet of areas specified at a later time t.”

    From A covariant entropy conjecture (1999) · cites this paper as [15]

  • Some universes recollapse and necessarily contain trapped surfaces; trapped regions can occur in any case by gravitational collapse.

    “Some universes, for example most closed universes, or a flat universe with negative cosmological constant [15], recollapse.Such universes necessarily contain trapped surfaces.But trapped regions can occur in any case by gravitational collapse.”

    From A covariant entropy conjecture (1999) · cites this paper as [15]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kaloper, N., & Linde, A.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
1999
Volume
60
Issue
10
ISSN
0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2142877561
Cited by
132
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
8.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Keywords
holographic principle, cosmic inflation, Bekenstein-Hawking bound, black hole entropy, closed universe, open universe, flat universe, negative cosmological constant, unitarity, causality, particle horizon, gravitational collapse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review