The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
Análisis Comparativo y Refutación Determinista de la Incertidumbre Cuántica Óptica de Fluidos en la Variedad RP3 vs. Ortodoxia Probabilística
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Geometrically Accurate Topology-Correction of Cortical Surfaces Using Nonseparating Loops
Segonne, F., Pacheco, J., & Fischl, B. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2006.887364 · Cited by 992
Membranes at quantum criticality
Hořava, P. (2009) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2009/03/020 · Cited by 731
Dark Energy from structure: a status report
Buchert, T. (2008) · General Relativity and Gravitation · doi:10.1007/s10714-007-0554-8 · Cited by 388
The Kähler-Ricci flow on surfaces of positive Kodaira dimension
Song, J., & Tian, G. (2007) · Inventiones mathematicae · doi:10.1007/s00222-007-0076-8 · Cited by 162
Things fall apart: topology change from winding tachyons
Adams, A., Liu, X., McGreevy, J., Saltman, A., & Silverstein, E. (2005) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2005/10/033 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Perelman, G.
- Venue
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Publisher
- Cornell University
- Published
- 2002-11-11
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- math/0211159
- OpenAlex
- W1970564715
- Cited by
- 2,245
- References
- 0
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Análisis Comparativo y Refutación Determinista de la Incertidumbre Cuántica Óptica de Fluidos en la Variedad RP3 vs. Ortodoxia Probabilística. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.math/0211159
- The paper
- Perelman, G. (2002). Análisis Comparativo y Refutación Determinista de la Incertidumbre Cuántica Óptica de Fluidos en la Variedad RP3 vs. Ortodoxia Probabilística. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.math/0211159
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
