The DOI matches its Crossref record; 151 of the 151 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dark Energy from structure: a status report
Open accessAbstract
The effective evolution of an inhomogeneous universe model in any theory of gravitation may be described in terms of spatially averaged variables. In Einstein’s theory, restricting attention to scalar variables, this evolution can be modeled by solutions of a set of Friedmann equations for an effective volume scale factor, with matter and backreaction source terms. The latter can be represented by an effective scalar field (“morphon field”) modeling Dark Energy. The present work provides an overview over the Dark Energy debate in connection with the impact of inhomogeneities, and formulates strategies for a comprehensive quantitative evaluation of backreaction effects both in theoretical and observational cosmology. We recall the basic steps of a description of backreaction effects in relativistic cosmology that lead to refurnishing the standard cosmological equations, but also lay down a number of challenges and unresolved issues in connection with their observational interpretation. The present status of this subject is intermediate: we have a good qualitative understanding of backreaction effects pointing to a global instability of the standard model of cosmology; exact solutions and perturbative results modeling this instability lie in the right sector to explain Dark Energy from inhomogeneities. It is fair to say that, even if backreaction effects turn out to be less important than anticipated by some researchers, the concordance high-precision cosmology, the architecture of current N-body simulations, as well as standard perturbative approaches may all fall short in correctly describing the Late Universe.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Three‐Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe ( WMAP ) Observations: Implications for Cosmology
Spergel, D. N., Bean, R., Dore, O., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Dunkley, J., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Komatsu, E., Page, L., et al. (2007) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/513700 · Cited by 6,778
COPELAND, E. J., SAMI, M., & TSUJIKAWA, S. (2006) · International Journal of Modern Physics D · doi:10.1142/s021827180600942x · Cited by 6,239
The cosmological constant and dark energy
Peebles, P. J. E., & Ratra, B. (2003) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.75.559 · Cited by 5,213
Theory of cosmological perturbations
Mukhanov, V (1992) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/0370-1573(92)90044-z · Cited by 3,608
Three-manifolds with positive Ricci curvature
Hamilton, R. S. (1982) · Journal of Differential Geometry · doi:10.4310/jdg/1214436922 · Cited by 2,792
THE CASE FOR A POSITIVE COSMOLOGICAL Λ-TERM
SAHNI, V., & STAROBINSKY, A. (2000) · International Journal of Modern Physics D · doi:10.1142/s0218271800000542 · Cited by 2,767
Astier, P., Guy, J., Regnault, N., Pain, R., Aubourg, E., Balam, D., Basa, S., Carlberg, R. G., Fabbro, S., Fouchez, D., et al. (2006) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20054185 · Cited by 2,434
Physical Foundations of Cosmology
Mukhanov, V. (2005) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511790553 · Cited by 2,316
Republication of: The dynamics of general relativity
Arnowitt, R., Deser, S., & Misner, C. W. (2008) · General Relativity and Gravitation · doi:10.1007/s10714-008-0661-1 · Cited by 2,284
Perelman, G. (2002) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.math/0211159 · Cited by 2,245
Cited by
Cosmology and Fundamental Physics with the Euclid Satellite
The Euclid Theory Working Group, Amendola, L., Appleby, S., Bacon, D., Baker, T., Baldi, M., Bartolo, N., Blanchard, A., Bonvin, C., Borgani, S., et al. (2013) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2013-6 · Cited by 899
Carlip, S. (2023) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/acceb4 · Cited by 41
A model of interacting dark fluids tested with supernovae and Baryon Acoustic Oscillations data
Bégué, D., Stahl, C., & Xue, S.-S. (2019) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2019.01.001 · Cited by 37
“a well established observational basis, its nature is still an opaque mystery. Different proposals include, among others, dynamical dark energy (quintessence) (Tsujikawa 2013), dynamical backreaction (Buchert 2008), inhomogeneous cosmologies (Bolejko et al. 2011; Stahl 2016) and modified gravity (Joyce et al. 2015). Mor…”
BackgroundAbdalla, E., Abellán, G. F., Aboubrahim, A., Agnello, A., Akarsu, Ö., Akrami, Y., Alestas, G., Aloni, D., Amendola, L., Anchordoqui, L. A., et al. (2022) · Journal of High Energy Astrophysics · doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2022.04.002 · Cited by 37
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Buchert, T.
- Venue
- General Relativity and Gravitation
- Published
- 2007-12-11
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 467-527
- ISSN
- 0001-7701 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-9532
- OpenAlex
- W1973240083
- Cited by
- 388
- References
- 151
- FWCI
- 22.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dark Energy from structure: a status report. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10714-007-0554-8
- The paper
- Buchert, T. (2008). Dark Energy from structure: a status report. General Relativity and Gravitation. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-007-0554-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.